Wednesday 04 September
08:00

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A10
08:00 - 09:50

NETWORKING SESSION
Emerging Concepts
CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT

Chairperson: Giustino VARRASSI (President) (Chairperson, Roma, Italy)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Giustino VARRASSI (President) (Keynote Speaker, Roma, Italy)
08:05 - 08:27 #43302 - A10 Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Treatment: Do They Influence Pain Therapeutic Modalities/.
Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Treatment: Do They Influence Pain Therapeutic Modalities/.

 Although progress in cancer treatment and awareness for cancer pain has significantly increased over the last years, the prevalence of cancer pain is still high.

The data shows that 1/3 of patients during their treatment and more than half with advanced disease experience moderate to severe pain. 1

 Cancer pain can be characterized as Visceral, Somatic, Neuropathic, and may result from various reasons, including tumor spread in contiguous tissues, metastasis ( bone), cancer treatment ( chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) 

 

Chemotherapy is along with surgery the first line of treatment for malignant neoplasms.

Chemotherapeutic agents have cytotoxic properties and are used to stop the growth and division of cancer cells but at the same time affect healthy cells causing significant side effects.

In relation to pain the most significant side effect, is Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN).

To understand how chemotherapy treatment influences the pain therapeutic modalities we have to evaluate the mechanisms that cause CIPN and develop mechanistic approaches for its treatment.

There are peripheral mechanisms that contribute to the development of CIPN with alterations in the DRG involving activation of protein kinases A and C, PI3/AKT pathway, as well as increased expression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1, IL 1-a, IL1-b, IL6, TNF a, CXCL1. 

Preclinical studies demonstrated that there is an increased expression of the Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels TRPV1 and TRPV4 in the DRG eluding in their possible role in CIPN.

Voltage gated sodium channels such as Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 play a significant role in the transmission of pain-related signals. Chemotherapy causes activation and increased expression of the Nav1.7 and Nav 1.8 channels in the peripheral nerve terminals and the DRG, contributing to chemotherapy induced pain. It has been  demonstrated in preclinical studies that chemotherapy also causes depolarization of potassium channels in peripheral sensory neurons increasing their excitation, as well as increased expression of d-1calcium channels leading to exacerbation of pain.2

Mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, inhibition of transcription factors are additional peripheral  mechanisms contributing to the development of CIPN.

Spinal mechanisms of CIPN include similarly activation of ion channels, transcription factors, inflammatory mediators, immune regulation on nociceptive signal transmission.2

Supraspinal regions such as the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex NMDA receptors, are involved in chemotherapy induced pain.3,4

 

Pharmacological treatment recommended based on the above mechanisms for the development of CIPN include nerve-protective therapy with Erythropoietin,

 N-acetylcysteine, ion channel targeted therapies, with medications such as Lidocaine, Mexiletine, Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Magnesium, Anti-inflammatory therapy with Metformin, minocycline, Neurotransmitter-based therapy with medications such as Venlafaxine, Duloxetine, and Tricyclic Antidepressants and Antioxidants.5

 

Immunotherapy is based in the appreciation of the whole tumor microenvironment, and it is a rapidly advancing field in cancer therapeutics. The discovery of tumor biomarkers derived from the tumor microenvironment  can lead to a shift from the pre-existing immune response to a therapy induced individualized immune response.6

Immunotherapy may cause sometimes significant inflammation and immune related adverse events are  mostly  induced by agents known as immune check point inhibitors (ICI). Occasionally there is a need for an immunosuppressant such as a steroid to attenuate the inflammation at a safer level. Tapering of the steroid course must be quick to avoid risk of infection. The adverse events from immunotherapy when severe may cause pain. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group has developed recommendations for managing toxicities associated with ICI.7

Most common ones are hepatobiliary adverse events such as liver, pancreatic toxicities and gallbladder injury. Additionally endocrine adverse events such as hypophysitis and thyrotoxicosis, and pulmonary as well as rheumatologic/musculoskeletal adverse events may be developed.  Pain in the above circumstances is treated by applying the WHO algorithm limiting the use of acetaminophen and NSAIDS when appropriate. Also it is important to be mindful of their antipyretic effect that could be masking an underlying infection in the immunosuppressed cancer patients.

During chemotherapy/ immunotherapy cancer pain is treated mostly with medications and non-drug treatment options. Interventional therapies are limited due to the risk of infection and bleeding due to chemotherapy induced immunosuppression and thrombocytopenia.

While pharmacotherapy is effective for the treatment of mild to moderate and even severe pain when opioids are used the development of tolerance overtime may render it ineffective.

It is important to mention that several interventional procedures such as intrathecal drug delivery, or spinal cord and  peripheral nerve stimulation amongst others can improve pain control.

Although the application of the intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) remains underutilized in patients with cancer pain its  effectiveness has been established for significantly improving cancer pain as well as decreasing the risks of adverse events from chronic opioid use.8  More studies are currently conducted to improve the evidence of the efficacy, the cost effectiveness, risk mitigation, and to establish a common approach for the use of IDDS to improve cancer pain.9

 

 

References

1)        Marieke H. J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen et al. Treatment of Pain in Cancer: Towards Personalized Medicine. Cancers (Basel), 2018 Dec; 10 (12) :502

2)        Yuhao Xu et al. Mechanisms underlying paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain : Channels, Inflammation and Immune regulations.  European Journal of Pharmacology, 933 (2022) 1752888

3)        Liu J et al. Glutaminergic neurons in the amygdala are involved in Paclitaxel -induced pain and anxiety, Front Psychiatr.13, 869544

4)        Liang L et al. Paclitaxel induces sex-biased behavioral deficits and changes in gene expression in mouse prefrontal cortex. 2020, Neuroscience 426, 168-178

5)        Lang-Yue Hu et al.  Prevention and Treatment for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Therapies based on CIPN Mechanisms. Current Neuropharmacology, 2019, 17,184-196

6)        Wolf H Fridman et al. The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment.

Nature Reviews, CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Volume 14, December 2017,717

 

7)        Puzanov I et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society  for Immunotherapy of Cancer  (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. Journal of ImmunoTherapy  of Cancer (2017) 5:95

8)        Rui Duarte et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for the Management of Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:11-26-1141

9)        Shane E Brogan et al.  Controversies in Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:319-325.


Efrossini (Gina) VOTTA-VELIS (Chicago, USA)
08:27 - 08:49 Helping cancer survivor in pain: pre-habilitation, rehabilitation, interventions. Oscar DE LEON CASASOLA (Chief, Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Fellowship Director) (Keynote Speaker, Buffalo, USA)
08:49 - 09:11 Evidence for the efficacy of interventional pain procedure for cancer pain. Magdalena ANITESCU (Professor of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Chicago, USA)
09:11 - 09:33 Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain (ITTDS) /. Denis DUPOIRON (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Angers, France)
09:33 - 09:50 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B10
08:00 - 08:50

ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION
Evolution and Current Trends in Regional Anesthesia

Chairperson: Nadia HERNANDEZ (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology) (Chairperson, Houston, Texas, USA)
08:00 - 08:02 Introduction. Nadia HERNANDEZ (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Houston, Texas, USA)
08:02 - 08:16 Prospects for the Future of Continuous Nerve Blocks: A Promising Outlook? Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Keynote Speaker, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
08:16 - 08:30 Revolutionary and Time-Tested Medications Sustaining Nerve Block Effectiveness. Maria Paz SEBASTIAN (Anaestheics and Acute Pain) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
08:30 - 08:44 Emerging technologies in peripheral nerve blocks. Graeme MCLEOD (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Dundee, United Kingdom)
08:44 - 08:50 Discussion.
PANORAMA HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E10
08:00 - 09:50

NETWORKING SESSION
State of the art anaesthesia for CS

Chairperson: Nuala LUCAS (Speaker) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Nuala LUCAS (Speaker) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
08:05 - 08:27 Neuraxial techniques for elective CS. Nicoletta FILETICI (Consultant anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Rome, Italy)
08:27 - 08:49 Neuraxial techniques for emergency CS. Jan BLAHA (Head of the Department) (Keynote Speaker, Praha 2, Czech Republic)
08:49 - 09:11 Choice of vasopressor. Kassiani THEODORAKI (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
09:11 - 09:33 Post CS analgesia. Eva ROOFTHOOFT (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Haacht, Belgium)
09:33 - 09:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
O10
08:00 - 11:00

OFF SITE - Hands - On Cadaver Workshop 1 - RA
UPPER & LOWER LIMB BLOCKS, TRUNK BLOCKS

WS Leader: Paul KESSLER (Lead Consultant) (WS Leader, Frankfurt, Germany)
Unique and exclusive for RA & Pain Cadaveric Workshops: Only whole-body cadavers will be available for the workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity to master your needling skills, perform the actual blocks on fresh cadavers and to improve your ergonomics under direct supervision of world experts in regional anaesthesia and chronic pain management. HANDS – ON CADAVER WORKSHOP USEFUL DOCS TO DOWNLOAD There won’t be an organized transportation for going/back from the Cadaver workshop.
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 1. Upper Limb Blocks. Luc SERMEUS (Head of department) (Demonstrator, Brussels, Belgium)
ISB, SCB, AxB, cervical plexus (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 2. Upper Limb and chest Blocks. Edward MARIANO (Speaker) (Demonstrator, Palo Alto, USA)
ICB, IPPB/PSPB (PECS), SAPB (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 3. Thoracic trunk blocks. Andrea TOGNU (Senior Consultant) (Demonstrator, Bologna, Italy)
Th PVB, ESP, ITP(Prone Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 4. Abdominal trunk Blocks. Lubos BENO (Doctor) (Demonstrator, USTI NAD LABEM, Czech Republic)
TAP, RSB, IH/II (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 5. Lower limb blocks. Yavuz GURKAN (Faculty member) (Demonstrator, Istanbul, Turkey)
SiFiB, PENG, FEMB, FTB, Aductor Canal B, Obturator (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 6. Lower limb blocks. Sandeep DIWAN (Consultant Anaesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Pune, India)
QLBs, proximal and distal sciatic B, iPACK (Lateral Position)
Anatomy Institute

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
I10
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 1 - CHRONIC PAIN
Musculosceletal UG Interventional Procedures in Pain Medicine - Shoulder & Upper Extremity

WS Leader: Ovidiu PALEA (head of ICU) (WS Leader, Bucharest, Romania)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Glenohumeral Joint, Supraspinatous Tendon & Subacromial / Subdeltoid Bursa. Ammar SALTI (Anesthesiologist and Pain Physician) (Demonstrator, abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Acromioclavicular Joint, Biceps Tendon, Rotator Cuff & Rotator Cuff Interval. Dan Sebastian DIRZU (consultant, head of department) (Demonstrator, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Elbow Joint - Anterior, Medial, Lateral & Posterior Elbow. Manfred GREHER (Medical Hospital Director and Head of Department) (Demonstrator, Vienna, Austria)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Wrist Joint - Carpal Tunnel Pathology. Ismael ATCHIA (Consultant Rheumatologist) (Demonstrator, Newcastle, United Kingdom)
220a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
J10
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 2 - CHRONIC PAIN
Musculosceletal UG Interventional Procedures in Pain Medicine - Shoulder & Upper Extremity

WS Leader: Andrzej DASZKIEWICZ (consultant) (WS Leader, Ustroń, Poland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Glenohumeral Joint, Supraspinatous Tendon & Subacromial / Subdeltoid Bursa. Gustavo FABREGAT (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Valencia, Spain)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Acromioclavicular Joint, Biceps Tendon, Rotator Cuff & Rotator Cuff Interval. Maurizio MARCHESINI (Pain medicine Consultant) (Demonstrator, OLBIA, Italy)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Elbow Joint - Anterior, Medial, Lateral & Posterior Elbow. Michal BUT (Consultant pain clinic) (Demonstrator, Koszalin, Poland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Wrist Joint - Carpal Tunnel Pathology. Duarte CORREIA (Head of Centro Multidisciplinar de Medicina da Dor - Dr. Rui Silva) (Demonstrator, DUARTE CORREIA, Portugal)
221a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
K10
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 1 - POCUS
POCUS in Emergency Room and ICU

WS Leader: Jan BOUBLIK (Assistant Professor) (WS Leader, Stanford, USA)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Airway Ultrasound (Difficult Airway Predictors, Vocal Cords, Cricothyroid Membrane Location). Kariem EL BOGHDADLY (Consultant) (Demonstrator, London, United Kingdom)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Lung Ultrasound (Normal Lung, Pneumothorax, Pleural Effusion). Andrea SAPORITO (Chair of Anesthesia) (Demonstrator, Bellinzona, Switzerland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST). Matthias HERTELEER (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Lille, France)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: FOCUS (I) - Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT), Pulmonary Thromboembolism (PE indirect signs), Cardiac Tamponade. Valentina RANCATI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Lausanne, Switzerland)
223a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
L10
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 1 - PAEDIATRIC
PNBs in the Paediatric Trauma Patient

WS Leader: Giorgio IVANI (Strada Tetti Piatti 77/17 Moncalieri) (WS Leader, Turin, Italy)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Trauma of the Upper Limb - Shoulder, Upper Arm and Elbow Fractures. Luc TIELENS (pediatric anesthesiology staff member) (Demonstrator, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Trauma of the Upper Limb - Lower Arm and Hand Trauma / Fractures. Eleana GARINI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Athens, Greece)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Trauma of the Lower Limb - Hip, Femur and Knee Fractures / Trauma. Valeria MOSSETTI (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Torino, Italy)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Trauma of the Lower Limb - Calf, Ankle and Foot Trauma. Fatma SARICAOGLU (Chair and Prof) (Demonstrator, Ankara, Turkey)
241

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
M10
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 1 - RA
PNBs for Shoulder, Elbow and Hand Surgery

WS Leader: Jose Alejandro AGUIRRE (Head of Ambulatory Center Europaallee) (WS Leader, Zurich, Switzerland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Major Shoulder Surgery - Different Approaches for ISC Block and Structures to Avoid. John MCDONNELL (Professor of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine) (Demonstrator, Galway, Ireland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Axillary, Suprascapular and Supraclavicular Nerves Blockade. Louise MORAN (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Letterkenny, Ireland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Elective Elbow Surgery & Elbow Fractures - Blocks for Patients with Limited Abduction, Catheter Placement, Tips & Tricks. Laurent DELAUNAY (Anaesthesiologist, Intensivist and perioperative medicine) (Demonstrator, ANNECY, France)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Axillary Block for Hand Surgery and How to Rescue Block Failures. Jose Alejandro AGUIRRE (Head of Ambulatory Center Europaallee) (Demonstrator, Zurich, Switzerland)
245
09:00

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B10.1
09:00 - 09:50

ASK THE EXPERT
POCUS is ultrasound

Chairperson: Mariana CORREIA (Consultant) (Chairperson, Lisboa, Portugal)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Mariana CORREIA (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Lisboa, Portugal)
09:05 - 09:35 Lung ultrasound pocus. Wolf ARMBRUSTER (Head of Department, Clinical Director) (Keynote Speaker, Unna, Germany)
09:35 - 09:50 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C10
09:00 - 09:30

TIPS & TRICKS
Blocks in the ICU

Chairperson: Thomas WIESMANN (Head of the Dept.) (Chairperson, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Thomas WIESMANN (Head of the Dept.) (Keynote Speaker, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)
09:05 - 09:25 RA Blocks in the ICU. Lukas KIRCHMAIR (Chair) (Keynote Speaker, Schwaz, Austria)
09:25 - 09:30 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D10
09:00 - 09:50

ASK THE EXPERT
World at war: benefits, advantages and pitfalls of early analgesic procedures

Chairperson: Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chair) (Chairperson, Vinnitsa, Ukraine)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chair) (Keynote Speaker, Vinnitsa, Ukraine)
09:05 - 09:35 Continuous peripheral nerves/ fascial planes catheters. Patrick SCHULDT (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Uppsala, Sweden)
09:35 - 09:50 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F11
09:00 - 09:50

SECOND OPINION BASED DISCUSSION
The best management of post amputation pain

Chairperson: Pavel MICHALEK (Deputy Director for Science, Research and Education) (Chairperson, Praha, Czech Republic)
09:00 - 09:10 Does Epidural still have a role in managing post amputation pain? Michal VENGLARCIK (Head of anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
09:10 - 09:20 Local anesthetic peripheral nerves catheters. Andrzej KROL (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, LONDON, United Kingdom)
09:20 - 09:30 Stimulating catheters placement: at which stage? Ashish GULVE (Consultant in Pain Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom)
09:30 - 09:40 Conclusion. Pavel MICHALEK (Deputy Director for Science, Research and Education) (Keynote Speaker, Praha, Czech Republic)
09:40 - 09:50 Q&A Discussion.
South Hall 2B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G11
09:00 - 09:30

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE - TARA SESSION
Headache

Chairperson: Sarah LOVE-JONES (Anaesthesiology) (Chairperson, Bristol, United Kingdom)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Sarah LOVE-JONES (Anaesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Bristol, United Kingdom)
09:05 - 09:25 Updates on interventional approaches to intractable headache. Samer NAROUZE (Professor and Chair) (Keynote Speaker, Cuyahoga Falls, USA)
09:25 - 09:30 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H11
09:00 - 11:00

SIMULATION TRAININGS

Demonstrators: Josip AZMAN (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Linkoping, Sweden), Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Demonstrator, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Roman ZUERCHER (Senior Consultant) (Demonstrator, Basel, Switzerland)
NORTH HALL
09:35

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C11
09:35 - 10:00

TIPS & TRICKS
In Obstetric Anesthesia

Chairperson: Suwimon TANGWIWAT (Staff anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Bangkok, Thailand)
09:35 - 09:38 Introduction. Suwimon TANGWIWAT (Staff anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Bangkok, Thailand)
09:38 - 09:55 #43474 - C11 Primum non nocere: unresolved issues in obstetric anesthesia.
Primum non nocere: unresolved issues in obstetric anesthesia.

3 important issues in obstetric anesthesia: future directions for obstetric anaesthesia research.

 

Alexandra M.J.V. Schyns-van den Berg

 

The relationship between childbirth and anaesthesia has a rich history. In January 1847, just 3 months after the first public demonstration of ether anaesthesia by William Morton in Boston, James Young Simpson in Scotland used ether to provide pain relief during childbirth. Within a few years, inhalation analgesia with chloroform during labour became acceptable in the UK, not only providing pain relief but also facilitating surgical caesarean delivery during obstructed labour. Today, obstetric anaesthesia extends far beyond the provision of analgesia and anaesthesia during childbirth. In countries where anaesthesiology collaborates actively with obstetricians, it has evolved into a subspecialty which contributes to high qualitative obstetric care for both healthy and high-risk obstetric patients. Pain relief methods reduce the burden of delivery, obstetric intensive care optimizes treatment for severely ill pregnant patients, and advanced anaesthesia techniques facilitate interventions crucial for successful pregnancies and optimal outcomes for both mother and child. 

Obstetric anaesthesiologists aim to minimally interfere with the natural course of childbirth. Contemporary techniques for labour analgesia, refined over the years, are based on optimized techniques, delivery methods and drugs. This has resulted in minimal effects on clinical progress. Recent studies show that the incidence of instrumental deliveries is no longer increased, and the duration of the first and second stage of labour is only minimally affected.1,2 Providing effective labour analgesia that ensures patient comfort and security while optimizing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction requires a delicate anaesthesiologic balancing act. In the era of social media, effective communication with patients, partners and professionals should include strategies to educate, manage patients’ expectations and combat misinformation. Potential side effects of the various analgesia options should be discussed and, where possible, prevented. 

Despite advancements, several important issues in obstetric anaesthesia remain insufficiently understood. 

1. Neuraxial analgesia interference with the natural course of labour. Epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia are regarded as the optimal methods for managing labour pain, offering superior pain relief with minimal adverse effects and leading to greater maternal comfort and satisfaction compared to alternative techniques. However, the impact of neuraxial analgesia on uterine activity (UA) and contraction frequency remains poorly understood and challenging to measure directly. Historically, epidural analgesia (EDA) was associated with increased rates of instrumental delivery, more frequent use of oxytocin for labour augmentation, and a longer duration of the first and second stage of labour. Contemporary neuraxial techniques, novel drug delivery regimens and the use of lower concentrations of local anaesthetics and opioids have largely mitigated these effects, though an increased need for oxytocin augmentation persists without a clear causal relationship established. Direct measurements of UA following EDA initiation have yielded inconsistent results, with recent studies reporting decreased, unchanged, or enhanced UA.3–5 These conflicting findings may be attributed to variations in clinical settings, EDA drug compositions, and UA measurement methods. Current obstetric practice mostly relies on external tocodynamometry (TOCO) for UA monitoring, despite its limitations in accuracy and reliability, as the more precise but invasive intrauterine pressure catheters (IUPC) have associated risks which preclude routine use. A recently developed non-invasive monitoring technique which measures the myometrial electrical activity, electrohysterography (EHG), shows promise in providing more accurate and reliable UA measurements compared to TOCO.6,7EHG may provide a new opportunity to enhance our understanding of the relationship between EDA and UA, potentially leading to improved monitoring and management of labour.

2. Maternal fever during epidural analgesia. The mechanisms causing maternal fever in some patients during epidural analgesia are still incompletely understood, which prevents the development of preventive measures. Maternal fever, defined as a temperature ³ 380C, occurs in approximately 20% of women receiving epidural labour analgesia, with an increased incidence with a longer exposure to EDA. Similarly to infectious fever, there is an underlying primary inflammatory mechanism, with increased risks possibly related to a preexisting inflammatory state. Epidural-associated maternal fever (EAMF) is associated with adverse maternal outcomes such as increased duration of labour, oxytocin augmentation and instrumental delivery, but causality has not been established and unknown confounding factors may be present. 8,9  It is accompanied by a higher rate of maternal antibiotic administration, contributes to peripartum anxiety and discomfort and neonates are at increased risk of neonatal sepsis evaluations and neonatal intensive care admission due to fetal tachycardia and hyperthermia. Hyperthermia and inflammation can be independently or synergistically deleterious to the term fetus and neonate and higher perinatal morbidity is reported, including seizures and cerebral palsy.9,10  The aetiology of EAMF is still unknown, but various underlying mechanisms have been proposed, with increasing evidence for a non-infectious inflammatory process triggered by an anaesthetic drug-induced metabolic dysfunction.9,11 Distinguishing EAMF from infectious causes of fever such as chorioamnionitis, bacterial or viral infections is vital to initiate adequate treatment wherever possible. Fever associated with EDA presents challenges in the clinical care of parturients. Improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms may contribute to prevention and management and enhance safety of mothers and newborns.

3. Postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The positional headache which often develops after accidental dural puncture during epidural labour initiation and occasionally after spinal anaesthesia is not always self-limiting nor benign. The current accepted pathophysiology considers PDPH the result from loss of CSF through a breach of the dura mater into the epidural space causing loss of CSF volume, which cannot be replaced by CSF production. The resulting CSF hypovolemia leads to a reduced cushioning and downward displacement of the intracranial brain tissue, causing traction on pain-sensitive structures and a secondary vasodilation.12–14 But many questions remain unresolved: why do some patients develop severe PDPH after an uneventful spinal anaesthesia with a thin atraumatic needle, while other patients never experience any symptoms after severe spinal CSF loss? In anaesthesia, PDPH is a clinical diagnosis, which according to the international classification of headache Disorders (ICHD-3) is the result of low CSF pressure.15 It shares symptoms with other orthostatic headache syndromes attributed to low CSF pressure such as spontaneous intracranial hypotension or PDPH after lumbar punctures. And while diagnostic procedures are more often applied in these manifestations of low CSF pressure, there is limited evidence of reduced CSF pressure, nor is radiologic evidence of CSF leakage present in the majority of SIH cases.16  The development of various non-invasive MRI techniques which allow imaging of the dynamics of intracranial fluid components, recently improved insights in CSF homeostasis and the role of the glymphatic system in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and increased understanding of cerebral blood flow regulation all raise new questions.17–21Anaesthesiologists should actively collaborate with neuroscientists and physiologists in future multidisciplinary basic research projects in order to improve our understanding of PDPH, contribute to preventive measures and optimize treatment strategies.

Conclusion

Most clinical research focuses on optimizing obstetric anaesthesia provision and studies the incidences and circumstances under which undesirable side effects occur. Contemporary basic research in this field, apart from studies into the origins of maternal fever during epidural analgesia, is less developed and many preclinical studies originate from last century. Since then, new tools have been developed and new insights emerged. Obstetricians and anaesthesiologists should collaborate more actively with basic scientists to improve our understanding of labour physiology and how various interventions affect it. Similarly, clarifying the mechanisms underlying epidural-related fever and PDPH will contribute to reduced complications and improved performance of obstetric anaesthesiology.

As we continue to advance the field of obstetric anaesthesia, we must never forget the adage: "Primum non nocere" (First, do no harm). This requires a thorough understanding of our interventions and their potential consequences. By addressing these important issues through rigorous basic and clinical research and interdisciplinary collaboration, we can further enhance the safety and efficacy of obstetric anaesthesia, ultimately improving outcomes for mothers and newborns alike.

1.       References

1.            Wang TT, Sun S, Huang SQ. Effects of epidural labor analgesia with low concentrations of local anesthetics on obstetric outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1571-1580. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001709

2.            Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;2018(5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4

3.            Maetzold E. Fetal Heart Changes Following Neuraxial Analgesia in Uteroplacental Insufficiency Pregnancies [30I]. Obstetrics& Gynecology. 2018;131(5):105S.

4.            Benfield R, Song H, Salstrom J, Edge M, Brigham D, Newton ER. Intrauterine contraction parameters at baseline and following epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia: A repeated measures comparison. Midwifery. 2021;95(January). doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.102943

5.            Poma S, Scudeller L, Verga C, et al. Effects of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on first stage of labor: a cohort studJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. Published online 2018.

6.            Frenken MWE, Van Der Woude DAA, Vullings R, Oei SG, Van Laar JOEH. Implementation of the combined use of non-invasive fetal electrocardiography and electrohysterography during labor: A prospective clinical study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;(March):1-8. doi:10.1111/aogs.14571

7.            Vlemminx MWC, Thijssen KMJ, Bajlekov GI, Dieleman JP, Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB, Oei SG. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;215:197-205. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.027

8.            Lu R, Rong L, Ye L, Xu Y, Wu H. Effects of epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever and maternal outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2024;37(1). doi:10.1080/14767058.2024.2357168

9.            Sultan P, David AL, Fernando R, Ackland GL. Inflammation and Epidural-Related Maternal Fever: Proposed Mechanisms. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(5):1546-1553. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001195

10.        Lange EMS, Segal S, Pancaro C, Grobman WA, Russell GB, Toledo P. Association between Intrapartum Magnesium Administration and the Incidence of Maternal Fever. 2018;(December 2017):942-952.

11.        Goetzl L. Maternal fever in labor: etiologies, consequences, and clinical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1274-S1282. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.002

12.        Vallejo MC, Zakowski MI. Post-dural puncture headache diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):179-189. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2022.01.002

13.        Schyns-van den Berg AMJV, Gupta A. Postdural puncture headache: Revisited. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023;37(2):171-187. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2023.02.006

14.        Sachs A, Smiley R. Post-dural puncture headache: The worst common complication in obstetric anesthesia. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(6):386-394. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2014.07.007

15.        Olesen J. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211. doi:10.1177/0333102417738202

16.        Schievink WI. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension. NEJM. 2021;385(23):2173-2178. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000000193

17.        Agarwal N, Lewis LD, Hirschler L, et al. Current Understanding of the Anatomy, Physiology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Neurofluids: Update From the 2022 “ISMRM Imaging Neurofluids Study group” Workshop in Rome. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2024;59(2):431-449. doi:10.1002/jmri.28759

18.        Petitclerc L, Hirschler L, Wells JA, et al. Ultra-long-TE arterial spin labeling reveals rapid and brain-wide blood-to-CSF water transport in humans. Neuroimage. 2021;245(November):118755. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118755

19.        Orešković D, Radoš M, Klarica M. Role of choroid plexus in cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. Neuroscience. 2017;354(2017):69-87. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.025

20.        Lohela TJ, Lilius TO, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system: implications for drugs for central nervous system diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(10):763-779. doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00500-9

21.        Rasmussen MK, Mestre H, Nedergaard M. Fluid transport in the brain. Physiol Rev. 2022;102(2):1025-1151. doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2020

 

 

 


Alexandra SCHYNS-VAN DEN BERG (Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
09:55 - 10:00 Q&A.
South Hall 1A
10:00 COFFEE BREAK

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S1
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 1

Chairperson: Vicente ROQUES (Anesthesiologist consultant) (Chairperson, Murcia. Spain, Spain)
10:05 - 10:10 #41265 - EP002 Enhancing Quality of Life - Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Case Series of 20 Patients.
EP002 Enhancing Quality of Life - Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Case Series of 20 Patients.

Despite advancements in drug and surgical treatments, chronic back pain following failed back surgery remains a significant challenge. Some patients endure persistent pain unresponsive to conventional therapies, resulting in medication tolerance and surgical risks. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a non-pharmacological innovative option to regulate pain signals in this specific population.

We present a case series of 20 patients, with intractable chronic pain, after extensive treatments, including physiotherapy and multiple surgeries. They experienced severe pain, significantly impacting their quality of life. Duration of treatment application was documented, its effect on pain intensity was measured by the VAS scale (0-10), and the DN4 questionnaire. To assess its impact on quality of life, we administered the SF12 questionnaire before the intervention and six months later, alongside any alterations in their medication regimen.

The results demonstrated a >45% in VAS scale and 50% reduction in DN4 questionnaire respectively. Patients reported a notable improvement in their quality of life, marked by return to simple everyday activities. The implementation of SCS resulted in a reduction in systemic drug therapy. However, one SCS had to be removed due to infection.

SCS effectively treats drug-resistant chronic pain, improving patients' quality of life in cases of failed back surgery syndrome. This underscores SCS's potential in challenging scenarios and advocates for its integration into specialized centers of excellence. SCS significantly reduces the burden of chronic pain, offering a safe alternative to traditional methods. Embracing SCS represents a crucial advancement in optimizing patient outcomes.
Evmorfia STAVROPOULOU, Fani ALEVROGIANNI (Athens, Greece), Eirini FAKINOU, Konstantina GOUTSOU, Maria MAVROMMATI, Fotios KOKKINAKOS, Aggeliki Maria SARIDAKI
10:10 - 10:15 #42445 - EP003 Successful cutaneous sensory blockade following single and double injection techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: a randomized controlled trial.
EP003 Successful cutaneous sensory blockade following single and double injection techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: a randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single and double injections of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks (S-PIPB). We hypothesized that double injections would yield superior success rates in achieving sensory blockade compared to the single injection technique.

Seventy cardiac patients undergoing median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive single or double injections of S-PIPB bilaterally. Each patient received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 μg/mL and dexamethasone 10 mg. Twenty mL/side was injected at the 3rd intercostal level in single-injection group, while 10 mL/injection was administered at the 2nd and 4th intercostal spaces in double-injection group. The primary outcome was successful S-PIPB, defined as sensory loss in the T2-T6 dermatomes at 30 minutes post-block. Secondary outcomes included block-related complications, intraoperative hemodynamics during sternotomy, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain, and recovery quality.

Double injections of S-PIPB achieved greater success rates on both sides of the chest walls (81% vs 51%, P<0.001) and increased the percentage of blockade in dermatomes T1 (83% vs 59%, P<0.003), T7 (67% vs 46%, P<0.017), and T8 (61% vs 39%, P=0.001) compared to single injection. One hematoma occurred in the double-injection group. Intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain, and recovery outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

When compared to a single injection, double injections of S-PIPB provided extended coverage of the T2-T6 dermatomes, which are crucial for median sternotomy. However, no differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamic effects or postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery.
Artid SAMERCHUA, Panuwat LAPISATEPUN (Chiangmai, Thailand), Chalita SROIWONG, Prangmalee LEURCHARUSMEE, Tanyong PIPANMEKAPORN, Wariya SUKHUPRAGARN, Settapong BOONSRI, Nutchanart BUNCHUNGMONGKOL
10:15 - 10:20 #42540 - EP004 Neurolysis with Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block for Chronic Raynaud Phenomenon in Systemic Sclerosis Patient: A Case Report.
EP004 Neurolysis with Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block for Chronic Raynaud Phenomenon in Systemic Sclerosis Patient: A Case Report.

Neurolysis with ultrasound-guided Stellate ganglion block (SGB) offers a minimally invasive and targeted approach for managing the symptoms of chronic Raynaud phenomenon (RP) such as digital ischemia and pain.

We were referred a 39 year old female patient with Systemic Sclerosis and developed RP since 8 months, who had necrosis of the first, second and third digits of the right hand with pulsating pins and needles sensation. The pain was especially intense during the night, and did not subside after systemic multimodal analgesia. We performed neurolysis ultrasound-guided SGB. With 1 ml of 1% lidocaine on the surface of longus colli muscle at the level C6, patient confirmed lesser pain sensation. Then we continued to deposit 0.5 ml of 2% lidocaine, 2 ml of 96% alcohol, 0.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and dexametasone 2.5mg on the surface of longus colli muscle at the level C6 and at the level of C7.

Significant pain relief accompanied with transient Horner Syndrome on the right side showed within minutes after procedures completion. During the first week patient showed significant pain relief, morphine was tapered off and stopped in first week. After seven days post SGB procedure, patient started to feel the pain again especially at night, although the intensity was still manageable with clonidine and diclofenac.

The positive outcome of the procedure with significant pain relief and reduced reliance on systemic analgesia, suggests that SGB can be a valuable intervention for chronic intractable RP
Weirna WINANTININGTYAS (Jakarta, Indonesia), Pryambodho Span, Dr. PRYAMBODHO, Antonius Wahyu HENDRAWAN
10:20 - 10:25 #42725 - EP005 Adductor Canal Block: injectate spread at different locations.
EP005 Adductor Canal Block: injectate spread at different locations.

Adductor canal block (ACB) is an effective analgesic technique for lower limb surgeries. Anatomic studies on injectate spread yield mixed results. Here, we assess dye spread at three distinct adductor canal locations.

An observational cadaveric study was conducted. Twelve lower limbs from fresh unembalmed cadavers were studied. An ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with 20 ml of methylene blue was performed in each limb in one of three locations that was defined according to the location of femoral artery (FA): Medial (proximal adductor canal), inferior (mid-adductor canal), and lateral (distal adductor canal) to the mid-point of the sartorius muscle (SM). Nine limbs (three of each injection location) were dissected to asses spread location. The 3 other specimens were sectioned in coronal slices for further anatomical examination. We hypothesized that proximal (femoral triangle, femoral nerve) and distal (popliteal fosa) spread would differ according to the injection location.

Regardless of injection location, staining was observed in adductor canal in all specimens. In the proximal injection, 3 specimens (75%) had staining of the femoral nerve, without distal spread. In the mid-location, no proximal nor distal spread was noted. In the distal location, in 1 specimen (25%) spread reached the popliteal fossa, while in 2 cases (50%) it reached the adductor hiatus without staining the popliteal fossa. No femoral triangle spread was observed in the distal location.

An ACB performed in the mid-location (fermoral artery inferior to the sartorius muscle) does not result in proximal nor distal spread.
Nicolás TORRES Z (Barcelona, Spain), Jorge MEJIA, Marilyn ARIAS SALAZAR, Javier DOMENECH DE LA LASTRA, Isabel GARCÍA-ROJAS
10:25 - 10:30 #42839 - EP005b Association between afterhour Intensive care unit admission and mortality.
EP005b Association between afterhour Intensive care unit admission and mortality.

The intensive care unit (ICU) patient outcomes maybe influenced by the time of admission. We hypothesized that patients admitted to the ICU at afterhour would have more risk of death.

We defined the afterhour as the period of time between 22:00 and 06:59 h. A retrospective study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2018 in ICU. The primary outcomes was ICU mortality within 30h, 30days and 7 days following admission and ICU length of stay. Other variables were included: age, sex, comorbidities, source of referral, reason for admission.

Of 150 admissions, 34% occurred afterhour. Most afterhour admissions were men and were referred from emergency department (67.9%). They had lower APACHII and IGSII scores. More mortality was observed for those admitted at workhour (but was not significant). Analysis showed no association between afterhour admission and hospital length of stay, length of mechanical ventilation and death within 24h, althought it was higher.

Patients admitted afterhours were not significantly different from patients admitted at workhour. Incidence of men was more important and this can be explained by the frequency of road accidents at night and they were most commonly referred from the emergency department. We found no effect of afterhours admission on ICU mortality. It was even less than the mortality of patients admitted at workhour but death within 24 h was higher. This reflect probably a better initial management of admission at workhour. Afterhour ICU admission is not associated with higher mortality risk.
Ben Fredj MYRIAM, Maha BEN MANSOUR (Monastir, Tunisia), Sakly HAYFA, Ben Saad NESRINE, Bouksir KHALIL, Mandhouj OUMAYMA, Haj Salem RATHIA, Sabrine BEN YOUSSEF

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S2
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 2

Chairperson: Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Chairperson, Leuven, Belgium)
10:00 - 10:05 #40713 - EP007 Comparison of Costoclavicular and Lateral Sagittal Approaches for Infraclavicular Block Applications.
EP007 Comparison of Costoclavicular and Lateral Sagittal Approaches for Infraclavicular Block Applications.

We compared the superiority of two infraclavicular approaches, costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal (LS), especially their sensorimotor effects and hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rates.

Informed consent was obtained from 91 patients aged 18-80 years, ASA I-III, undergoing elective forearm and hand surgery. They were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Diaphragmatic movements were measured by USG in M-mode during deep and normal breathing. For both approaches, 30 mL of bupivacaine was injected with USG and nerve stimulator. Musculocutaneous, median, ulnar and radial nerve sensorimotor losses were checked every 5 minutes for 30 minutes. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured again 30 minutes after the block. The tourniquet area was checked and painless patients were not infiltrated, whereas others were infiltrated.

The onset time of sensory and motor block of the musculocutaneous and median nerves, motor block of the radial nerve and sensory block of the ulnar nerve and the number of patients with complete block at the end of 30 minutes were not different in either groups. During normal breathing, partial paralysis was observed in 10 CC and 11 LS patients, no complete paralysis. During deep breathing, partial paralysis was observed in 6 CC and 5 LS patients, no complete paralysis. Diaphragm excursion differences measured at baseline and 30 minutes after block were not significantly different in either group. Tourniquet infiltration was required significantly less in the CC than LS group.

In conclusion, we think that both approaches can be used safely especially in patients with respiratory system diseases, but more studies are needed.
Nazli ACU (Ankara, Turkey), Gökcen EMMEZ, Akif Muhtar ÖZTÜRK, Dudu Berrin GUNAYDIN, Irfan GUNGOR
10:05 - 10:10 #41505 - EP008 Effect of “Shoulder Block” on rebound pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A Case Series.
EP008 Effect of “Shoulder Block” on rebound pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A Case Series.

Postoperative-pain management in shoulder arthroscopy surgeries, traditionally involves an interscalene brachial-plexus block. Since the shoulder receives innervation through the suprascapular, axillary, lateral pectoral and subscapularis nerves, a more distal block was conceptualized to provide an infra-omohyoid suprascapular nerve and subscapularis plane block, which we termed as “shoulder block”. The primary outcome variable was incidence of rebound pain(transient acute-pain post-block resolution); secondary outcomes included NRS at various time points, time to rescue-analgesic (TTRA-tramadol), patient satisfaction, sleep disturbance and incidence of diaphragmatic-paresis(DP).

20 ASA-I and II patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were given an ultrasound-guided (Fijifilm sonosite edge 2) shoulder block(total 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine). General anaesthesia was induced prior to blocks with standard protocol. Prior to skin closure, all patients received intravenous diclofenac(75mg) and 1gm-PCM(8hourly thereafter). Postoperatively, time to rebound pain (NRS value ≥7 after block resolution was taken as criterion for evaluating rebound pain), NRS at various time points, total opioid consumption, sleep disturbance and patient satisfaction-scores were noted. Diaphragmatic function(using USG) was noted at 2 hours postoperatively in recovery.

In 1/20 patient with the NRS>7 (RPS) ,tramadol(50 mg around 12hours postop) was required. In 5/20 patients with NRS> 4, tramadol(one dose) was needed[figure-1].The TTRA was a mean of 603mins[bell-curve-figure 2]. Sleep disturbance (3/20), patient satisfaction score (>90%)and incidence of mild DP (3/20)were other observed variables .

Our study demonstrates significant reduction in rebound pain (NRS>7) and opioid consumption after “shoulder block” in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. However, a further comparative trial is mandatory with the gold standard-interscalene block.
Anubhuti JAIN (PUNE, India), Sandeep DIWAN, Abhishek LONIKAR
10:15 - 10:20 #42493 - EP010 Can assistive artificial intelligence facilitate ultrasound image acquisition in the absence of formalized USGRA training?
EP010 Can assistive artificial intelligence facilitate ultrasound image acquisition in the absence of formalized USGRA training?

Formalised ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia (USGRA) training is resource intensive and often difficult to access. Assistive artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology with potential to enhance training and provision of USGRA. We aim to evaluate if ScanNAV(TM) (Intelligent Ultrasound Limited) can enhance USGRA image acquisition of a ‘Plan-A Block’ for the non-expert in the absence of formalised training.

18 anaesthetists performed sonoanatomy on live models for two pre-selected Plan-A blocks, one with and one without prior formal training. ScanNAV(TM) was used in the latter alongside ScanNAV(TM) tutorial videos and RA-UK infographic material for reference. 2 expert assessors made objective assessments for each using a protocolised data collection tool.

15/18 (83.3%) participants successfully acquired appropriate ultrasound images for a Plan-A Block using ScanNAV(TM) and reference materials with no formal prior training. Sonoanatomy scans were performed faster on average in block procedures that had received prior formal USGRA training. The adductor canal block had an average procedure time of 23.52seconds vs 179.17seconds (t-test value 2.74; p-value 0.0168). Where formal training had taken place, participants scored higher in identifying key structures (ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus) across all Plan-A blocks, as well as accuracy grade of image acquisition and needle path safety.

Assistive AI, e.g. ScanNAV(TM) may facilitate image acquisition and identification of key sonoanatomical stuctures in the absence of formalised training. This technology should be used as an adjunct, not a replacement, for formalised training as objective assessment in speed, accuracy and safety were seen to be superior in this subgroup.
Huy NGUYEN (Oxford, United Kingdom), Nicholas SUAREZ, Joanna CUDLIPP, Peter CHATER-LEA, Jennifer FERRY, Elizabeth YATES, Mariam LATIF
10:20 - 10:25 #42447 - EP070 A novel approach of metric- based training for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block.
A novel approach of metric- based training for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block.

Performance of nerve block using ultrasound has improved success, reduced errors, and minimized complications. Skills related to the use of ultrasound are difficult to learn, however simulation has been proposed [Gallagher et al] as it allows trainees to rehearse procedural skills safely. To be effective, simulation must be integrated into a validated curriculum.

We undertook a series of studies in Cork University Hospital, Ireland to develop, validate and implement training programme relevant to performance of ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block (UGABPB). A panel of experts deconstructed the task of performing UGABPB to identify metrics and errors [Ahmed et al]. Thereafter, face and content validity were verified using a modified Delphi method. Metrics and errors were subjected to a validation process [Ahmed et al]. Video recording experts and novices performing the block on live patients were captured and assessed by two independent observers using validated metrics. The inter-rater reliability between the two observers was measured. Trainees were randomly allocated to either metric-based training group or traditional training group.

54 metrics and 32 errors were identified and unambiguously defined. Compared to novices, experts scored more steps and committed less errors when assessed using validated metrics. Construct validity was verified with an inter-rater reliability of more than 0.8. Trainees randomly allocated to metric based curriculum outperform their traditionally trained counterparts when they were assessed performing UGABPB in simulated platforms.

Metric based simulation training improved novice performance of UGABPB in simulation platform. Future studies should examine the impact on patients’ clinical outcomes.
Osman AHMED, Aysha YUSUFF SIDDIQUE (Doha, Qatar)
10:25 - 10:30 #42729 - EP012 Effectiveness and safety of Capsaicin 8% patch in treating neuropathic pain in off-label conditions and body areas: Two Case Reports.
EP012 Effectiveness and safety of Capsaicin 8% patch in treating neuropathic pain in off-label conditions and body areas: Two Case Reports.

High-concentration (8%) capsaicin patches have shown promise in treating chronic neuropathic pain. Their approved use is limited to neuropathy associated with HIV infection, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, or postherpetic neuralgia, and to areas distant from mucous membranes.

We selected two patients (A and B). Patient A had neuropathic pain in the upper lip secondary to radiotherapy. The painful area was marked and the patch cut to size, ensuring mucous membranes were protected. Patient B had neuropathic pain in the right ilioinguinal and genitofemoral area with a painful scar from right inguinal eventroplasty, refractory to botulinum toxin and pulsed radiofrequency treatment. Both patients received three treatment sessions 5 months apart from each other. The patch was applied for 20 minutes to the upper lip and 60 minutes to the inguinal area. The response was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Patient A: Pre-treatment VAS was 9. After the first application, there was no improvement. During the second application, the patient experienced burning and itching. After the third application, VAS improved to 6. Patient B: Pre-treatment VAS was 7. From the first application, classic adverse symptoms of burning and itching were noticed, followed by improvement days after. After the third application, the VAS was 4.

Qutenza appears effective for neuropathic pain from conditions not included in the technical specifications and in unusual body areas. The treatment response appears to improve with repeated applications. Qutenza shows promise as an alternative for chronic neuropathic pain, warranting further studies to expand its indications.
Cristina RODRIGUEZ OLIVA (Valencia, Spain), Mar ALONSO, Josep ALABADI, Leyre PEREZ, Reyes CORTÉS

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S3
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 3

Chairperson: Wojciech GOLA (Consultant) (Chairperson, Kielce, Poland)
10:00 - 10:05 #40865 - EP013 Evaluation of postoperative analgesia with intrathecal morphine after laparoscopic or robotic nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
EP013 Evaluation of postoperative analgesia with intrathecal morphine after laparoscopic or robotic nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Postoperative pain management in minimally invasive nephrectomy remains a critical aspect of patient care. This study explores the potential of low dose intrathecal preservative free morphine as a promising analgesic modality for enhancing postoperative pain control while minimizing systemic opioid requirements and associated side effects, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic or robotic-assisted nephrectomy were included in this single-center, double-blind, prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Preoperatively patients were randomly assigned using computer generated block randomisation sequence to receive intrathecal morphine 200 mcg with 1 ml 0.5% Bupivacaine hydrochloride in dextrose injection (Group-M) or a sham procedure (Group-C). All patients received standard intraoperative multimodal analgesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. Primary outcome was 24-hour intravenous morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative and 48-hour postoperative fentanyl requirement, static pain scores, dynamic pain on first ambulation and on coughing, postoperative complications, postoperative length of hospital stay and patient satisfaction score. P-value < 0.05 was considered as significant.

A total of sixty-two patients were recruited. The intravenous morphine consumption 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in Group-M (16.5 ± 12.3 mg) versus Group-C (27.2 ± 12.1 mg), p=0.001. There were significant differences in static pain scores up to first 12 hours and dynamic pain on first ambulation and coughing. Intraoperative and 48-hour postoperative rescue fentanyl requirements were significantly lower in Group-M, p<0.05 (Table 1).

Intrathecal morphine significantly reduces postoperative morphine requirement and postoperative pain scores.
Aditi GUPTA, Anshuman SARKAR, Sumantra Sarathi BANERJEE, Srimanta Kumar HALDAR (Kolkata, India), Gaurav AGGARWAL, Tarun JINDAL
10:10 - 10:15 #41515 - EP015 Comparison of remimazolam-based monitored anesthesia care with inhalation general anesthesia under the guidance of an ANI monitor during TURBT: a randomized controlled trial.
EP015 Comparison of remimazolam-based monitored anesthesia care with inhalation general anesthesia under the guidance of an ANI monitor during TURBT: a randomized controlled trial.

We aim to investigate the safety and feasibility of remimazolam-based monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) guided by analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitoring, while comparing the net anesthesia time (anesthesia time excluding procedure time) between MAC and inhalation general anesthesia.

In the remimazolam group, remimazolam was administered at a rate of 6 mg/kg/h until the loss of consciousness, followed by at a maintenance dose of 1 mg/kg/h, and adjusted. In the sevoflurane group, general anesthesia was induced with propofol 1-2 mg/kg and maintained with 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane. Following the loss of consciousness, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion or endotracheal intubation was performed after administration of intravenous 0.3-0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Remifentanil was administered using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) at effect-site concentration [Ce] of 3.0 ng/ml and adjusted to maintain the ANI scores in the range of 50-70 in both groups. The primary outcome was net anesthesia time, calculated by excluding the procedure time from the total anesthesia time.

Till now, 11 patients were enrolled. The net anesthesia time was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (14±7 vs. 25±4 min, p=0.023). The operating room occupancy time was also significantly shorter in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (32 ± 10 vs. 49 ±11 min, p=0.039). The procedure time, time to loss of consciousness and regaining consciousness, admission day were similar between the groups.

Remimazolam-based MAC proves to be a safer alternative for general anesthesia during TURBT.
Jin Ha PARK, Sarah SOH (Seoul, Republic of Korea), Bora LEE
10:15 - 10:20 #41588 - EP016 Combined peripheral nerve blocks as surgical anesthesia for above the knee amputation in a patient with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
EP016 Combined peripheral nerve blocks as surgical anesthesia for above the knee amputation in a patient with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

Achieving surgical anesthesia for above the knee amputation (AKA) utilizing peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) is challenging due to the complex innervation of the thigh compartment. At present, there is limited literature on the use of PNB as the sole anesthetic technique for AKA. This paper presents a case of a 61-year-old female and known case of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 who was scheduled for AKA due to a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in the right patellar area (Fig 1). The tumor was causing anemia and sepsis due to active bleeding and infection. The patient also developed hospital-acquired pneumonia.

The patient was started on Midazolam and Fentanyl followed by target-controlled infusion of Propofol for sedation. Five nerve blocks were performed: femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, subgluteal sciatic, and posterior femoral cutaneous. Ultrasound, nerve stimulator, and pressure monitor guidance was utilized. The concentration and volume of Ropivacaine was adjusted based on the patient’s weight (38 kg). A femoral nerve catheter was placed post-operatively for supplemental pain control.

The patient was hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure, with no recall of intra-operative events including the conduct of nerve blocks. She had good post-operative pain control and was subsequently discharged on the fifth post-operative day.

This case report highlights PNB as a safe and effective anesthetic technique for AKA in patients with contraindications to neuraxial and general anesthesia. Specific block of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (Fig 2), which was not described in past literature on PNB for AKA, was performed in this case.
Wilgelmyna AMBAT (Taguig City, Philippines), Samantha Claire BRAGANZA, Jacky CORPUZ, Alexis Katrina DE LA VICTORIA
10:20 - 10:25 #42601 - EP017 Development of a novel feedback tool for Regional Anaesthesia training.
EP017 Development of a novel feedback tool for Regional Anaesthesia training.

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anaesthesia (UGRA) occupies a wider curriculum role, with UK anaesthetic trainees expected to independently perform a variety of blocks upon completing training. UGRA is challenging to master; high-quality feedback is vital in enabling skill acquisition(1). Retrospective Video Review (RVR) is associated with a flatter learning curve when learning procedural skills(2), but has yet to be evaluated in UGRA. We aimed to evaluate the feedback process and further improve it.

We conducted a national survey evaluating UK anaesthetists’ attitudes and practices regarding feedback provision in UGRA training. Concurrently, we developed a feedback framework incorporating RVR of the ultrasound block video specifically performed by the trainee. This was trialled in a tertiary orthopaedic hospital as a Quality Improvement Project, with trainer-trainee pairs interviewed on their experience using this educational tool.

Of the 126 survey respondents, 62% were trainers and 38% were trainees. 36% of trainees were ambivalent/dissatisfied about feedback quality. Trainers were receptive to a feedback tool. Time taken to teach; clinical turnover; managing awake patients were barriers to feedback provision. 6 trainers and 4 trainees trialled the educational tool. Common themes included: greater objective evidence to base feedback on; increased discussion detail/quality (particularly with awake patients); benefits of checklist/structured approach.

This is the first national survey on UGRA feedback, and the first preliminary evaluation of RVR use incorporated into a UGRA feedback framework. There is further scope to develop our tool with the aim of validating it, such that it may be utilised widely to improve trainee-trainer experience.
Chao-Ying KOWA (London, United Kingdom), Deepa DIVAKAR, Kunal JOSHI, Rachel BAUMBER, Kate ADAMS, Simeon WEST, Boyne BELLEW
10:25 - 10:30 #42861 - EP018 Gradual shifting from traditional peripheral nerve block to newer motor sparing nerve block in patients with hip fracture surgery: Our retrospective audit.
EP018 Gradual shifting from traditional peripheral nerve block to newer motor sparing nerve block in patients with hip fracture surgery: Our retrospective audit.

Elderly patients with hip fractures coming for surgical fixation pose unique challenges and require a judicial fine balance. Motor weakness imposed by traditional nerve blocks (FIB and FNB). Although these conventional nerve blocks provide good pain relief they impose risks of more motor weakness and that induces delay in rehabilitation and postoperative falls.

We thus imposed newer motor-sparing blocks (PENG, SIFI, and LFCN blocks). Over two years, we conducted an audit in which time we saw shifting away more toward newer motor sparing blocks.

We analysed the data of 118 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery and received GA and or SA with traditional and/or newer motor-sparing nerve blocks. Patients who received any form of nerve blocks had a longer time to rescue analgesia and lesser requirement for both on-demand as well as regular opioids. SPatients who received nerve blocks cooperated better with physiotherapy once they gained motor power, but this resulted in a bit higher limb weakness and postoperative falls, especially in the traditional block group.

Overall the use of nerve blocks has improved the immediate pain as well as reduced the opioid requirements. The use of adjuvants in nerve blocks and the promotion of motor-sparing nerve blocks in ED and theatre will possibly improve further outcomes.
Hossam ABOULGHEIT, Dwarkesh THALAMATI, Anirban SOM, Pradipta BHAKTA (Tullamore, Ireland), Prasad LANKA

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S4
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 4

Chairperson: Nat HASLAM (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Sunderland, United Kingdom)
10:00 - 10:05 #41188 - EP019 Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic major liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.
EP019 Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic major liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

Postoperative pain management following laparoscopic liver resection remains a significant challenge despite advancements in anesthesia techniques. This study aimed to investigate whether a single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) could enhance postoperative analgesia in the first 24 h after surgery.

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single tertiary care center between August 2022 and January 2024. One hundred fourteen patients scheduled for laparoscopic major liver resection due to malignancy were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the control, ESPB, or QLB group in a 1:1:1 ratio. Both the ESPB and QLB groups received 40 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (20 mL on each side). The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and intraoperative and recovery parameters.

The average cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h after surgery was comparable among the groups. No significant intergroup differences were observed in cumulative opioid consumptions at all time-points (Figure 1). Pain at rest was significantly different in the PACU (PACU admission: P = 0.012; PACU worst pain: P = 0.012; PACU discharge: P = 0.006) and at 48h after surgery (P = 0.006). For pain when coughing, differences among the three groups were noted only at PACU admission and PACU worst pain (P = 0.002, P = 0.006, respectively)

Neither ESPB nor posterior QLB significantly reduced the cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h after laparoscopic major liver resection.
Yeon Ji NOH (Seoul, Republic of Korea), Yu Jeong BANG, Ryunga KANG, Justin Sangwook KO
10:05 - 10:10 #42075 - EP020 Xylocaine patch versus intercostals nerve block for control of peri-operative pain in patients undergoing thoracotomy for minor thoracic procedures.
EP020 Xylocaine patch versus intercostals nerve block for control of peri-operative pain in patients undergoing thoracotomy for minor thoracic procedures.

Thoracotomy is a painful surgical intervention characterized by a high incidence of chronic pain that can be reduced with an aggressive analgesic therapy, justifying the use of thoracic epidural analgesia with opiates and local anesthetics for their efficacy and the relatively high benefits, Unilateral intercostal nerve blocks are quick and simple. Single injection for two or three intercostals spaces. Xylocaine patch application can be a powerful analgesic adjunct to existing analgesic agents

Control intercostal group (Group I, n=20): Patient in this group will receive a dose of 5 ml bupivacaine 0.5% peri-neurally in each space. - Xylocaine patch (Group xylo, n=20): Patients in this group will receive xylocaine patch. Two patches to applied for each patient for 24 hours then to be removed. When sufficiently awake for pain assessment VAS at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours postoperatively. The time to the first request of rescue postoperative analgesic will be: “the time interval between the onset of recovery and the first request to postoperative analgesia”. Cumulative 24 hours analgesic consumption of and morphine will be recorded. Ramsay score for assessment of sedation at the same intervals for VAS.

there was significant difference in the first rescue analgesia with more than 8 hours postoperative in xylo group and only 2 hours in I group. total amount of opioids consumed in 24 hours following surgery in xylo group was significantly lower than the other group

xylocaine patch is an effective non invasive alternative in control of post thoracotomy pain
Mostafa ELTANTAWY, Mohamed KHALIFA, Mostafa ELTANTAWY (cairo, Egypt)
10:10 - 10:15 #42457 - EP021 Breast augmentation using local anaesthetic with Sedation produces low complication rates.
EP021 Breast augmentation using local anaesthetic with Sedation produces low complication rates.

In 2013 the lead author started carrying out breast augmentation under local anaesthetic with sedation on a day case basis in a stand-alone ambulatory surgical centre. Subsequently a total of 7 surgeons have carried out breast enlargement at the clinic using this technique. A retrospective review of the first 1019 patients was performed.

Inclusion criteria for breast enlargement under LA with sedation was ASA 1 or 2 and BMI less than 32. The procedure was carried out using local anaesthetic infiltration with anaesthetist delivered conscious sedation using a combination of propofol and fentanyl and no airway management. Standard breast enlargement precautions were undertaken. Patients were contacted though Survey Monkey survey to determine satisfaction with the procedure.

Average age of the patients was 32.7 years. 686 patients (67.3%) had had children. 897 patients (88%) were ASA 1. None were ASA 3. 132 patients (13.0%) were smokers. Average implant size was 380cc, 327 (32%) being anatomical and 692 (68%) round. 91 patients(8.9%) had submammary implants, the rest dual plane.In t Ierms of complications 32 patients had infections which generated a positive microbiology culture. These were mostly stitch abscesses, however, 9 patients had implants removed, washed and replaced. Subsequently 2 of these implants required removal and replacement some months later and a further 2 presented with capsular contracture years later.

Primary breast augmentation under local anaesthetic with sedation is a viable alternative to general anaesthesia. We found complication rates were low in comparison to studies quoting complication rates for general anaesthetic breast augmentation,
Vivek SIVARAJAN, Lee RIDDEL (Glasgow , United Kingdom), Ahmed ALMAKI
10:15 - 10:20 #42489 - EP022 Efficacy of PENG block over sedation during positioning in sub-arachnoid block for hemiarthroplasty of the hip: an observational study.
EP022 Efficacy of PENG block over sedation during positioning in sub-arachnoid block for hemiarthroplasty of the hip: an observational study.

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block gathered good results for pain relief in hip fracture. We compared the efficacy of PENG block over sedation technique in positioning for sub-arachnoid block (SAB) in patients with intracapsular fracture neck of femur (NOF) for hemiarthroplasty.

Sixteen patients in each group for hemiarthroplasty were consented for PENG block (Gr-A) and sedation (Gr-B) prior to SAB. Patients with mental obtundation and conditions contraindicated for SAB were excluded. Ultrasound guided PENG block with 20 ml of 0.25% of bupivacaine administered in Gr-A. SAB (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2.2 ml) commenced in lateral position 10 minutes after PENG block with fracture side up. Sedation with fentanyl, midazolam and propofol were given in Gr-B prior to positioning for SAB. Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain along with ease of positioning were assessed during SAB.

Mean age (79 yrs) and M:F ratio were identical in both groups. All patients were noted VAS 10 on minimal hip abduction on arrival. VAS reduced to 2 (12pt), 3( 4pt) 10 minutes after PENG block in Gr-A on positioning for SAB. While 37.5%(6pt) of Gr-B required additional boluses of sedation due to VAS 8 and above during positioning for SAB. Successful SAB commenced in 100% patients in Gr-A compared to 87.5 in Gr-B. No pain was observed in Gr-A on returning to supine immediately after SAB compare to 10 pts in Gr-B.

PENG block provide an effective analgesia in patients with intracapsular fracture NOF for positioning for SAB over sedation.
Golam Ferdous ALAM (London, United Kingdom), Amandeep SACHDEVA, Priya PATHAK, Gaurav KUMAR, Muhammad BUTT, Manish BHARDWAJ
10:20 - 10:25 #42536 - EP023 The Effects of Erector Spina Plane Block and Epidural Analgesia in Whipple Surgery.
EP023 The Effects of Erector Spina Plane Block and Epidural Analgesia in Whipple Surgery.

In addition to general anaesthesia, central and peripheral blocks are preferred for analgesia during pancreatic surgery. We aimed to investigate the effects of epidural and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks on intraoperative and postoperative pain, renal function, and haemodynamic variables in patients undergoing Whipple surgery.

The study participants were 65 ASAI-II-III patients aged 18–80 years who received general anaesthesia to undergo Whipple surgery. In the epidural group, a thoracic epidural block was performed at the appropriate level between T8 and T10 in 37 patients; a catheter was placed. In the ESP block group, a bilateral thoracic ESP block was performed with the administration of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL) on each side (50 mg bupivacaine) under ultrasonography guidance. Patients in this group received 50 mg of dexketoprofen before surgery. Pain scores and side effects were recorded at 0 min, 15 min, and 30 min postoperatively. The patients' intraoperative and 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative urine outputs; preoperative and 48 h postoperative creatinine levels; and 24 h postoperative systemic immune inflammation index (SII) values were recorded.

There was no statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of demographic data. Hourly Ultiva consumption, VAS (visual analog scala) values, and creatine output levels were significantly higher in the ESP block group than in the epidural block group.

Epidural block reduced postoperative pain scores and intraoperative opioid consumption. We believe that the efficacy of the ESP block can be better evaluated using quality of life and recovery scores.
Sertaç ÇETINKAYA, Mustafa TURAN (Ankara, Turkey), Ayça DUMANLI ÖZCAN
10:25 - 10:30 #42693 - EP024 Non-invasive neurophysiological methods in the prediction of chronic and neuropathic pain after major thoracic surgery. A preliminary report.
EP024 Non-invasive neurophysiological methods in the prediction of chronic and neuropathic pain after major thoracic surgery. A preliminary report.

Exploring neurobiological pain markers is crucial for tailored therapies. Non-invasive methods like EEG, pupillometry, and NOL provide nociception-related perioperative insights. This study examines their correlation with post-thoracic surgery pain, focusing on preoperative alpha EEG oscillations (Peak Alpha Frequency, PAF), pupillometry, and NOL's predictive potential.

Patients over 18 undergoing major thoracic surgery participated in this study. Pupillometry using the NPi-200 pupillometer assessed parameters like contraction velocity (CV), maximum contraction velocity (MCV), contraction percentage change (CH%) and dilation velocity (DV). Ambient light was measured with a commercial luxmeter. Scalp EEG was collected preoperatively using a 7-electrode EEGrid-headset. Data were processed using EEGLAB and FieldTrip, including preprocessing, frequency decomposition, and estimation of sensorimotor PAF. NOL data from the PMD-200 system were analyzed. General anesthesia was standardized, and opioid doses were calculated. Pain was assessed using an 11-point NRS at PACU, DN4 questionnaire, and NRS scale at one- and three-months post-surgery.

Data from 19 participants (10 males, mean age 68.05) demonstrated strong correlations between PACU pupillometry parameters and DN4 scores at one- and three-months post-surgery. Additionally, NRS scores at one and three months were significantly correlated with PACU pupillometry indices (table). Conversely, no significant associations were found between NOL or EEG data and pain outcomes.

Immediate postoperative pupillometry strongly correlates with chronic and neuropathic pain at one- and three-months post-thoracotomy, suggesting its predictive potential for long-term outcomes. However, preoperative PAF and intraoperative NOL did not correlate with postoperative pain, emphasizing pupillometry's utility in personalized pain perception and management, warranting further validation with larger cohorts.
Chrysanthi BARBA, Charikleia VRETTOU, Kassiani THEODORAKI (Athens, Greece)

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S5
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 5

Chairperson: Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Chairperson, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
10:00 - 10:05 #41449 - EP025 Prediction of the Nerves Depth during Limbs’ Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Children.
EP025 Prediction of the Nerves Depth during Limbs’ Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Children.

The Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNB) are becoming a major analgesic technique for the children’s inferior/superior limbs surgery. The objective of this research is to design a formula which will help predict with accuracy the depth of the nerves according to the weight of patients benefitting from PNB.

This prospective and analytical study includes children that will undergo limbs surgery. The PNB were realized with a guided ultra-sound or a neurostimulation. Additionally, the Distance between the Nerve and the Skin (DNS) was measured in all children under study. The data were analyzed by SPSS “20” as well as Stata software for a linear regression.

355 patients were included in this study. The average age was 9,29 ± 4,13 years old and the average weight was 34,7 ± 17 kg. The average DNS was 21,97 ± 10,02 mm. The findings also showed an average correlation R2= 0,48 between the DNS and the children’s weight (P < 0,001). This enabled us to elaborate a formula to predict the length of the needle according to: the weight of the child, the detecting technique and the PNB type realized [DNS (DNP) = 4,33 + 5,48 (technique) + 0,23 (weight) + β (Corresponding to the type of block).

DNS measurement can be a good guide for needle placement in order to reduce the risk of nerves complications.
Samir BOUDJAHFA (ORAN, Algeria), Mohammed KENDOUSSI
10:05 - 10:10 #41702 - EP026 External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block vs. Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:A Randomized Prospective Study.
EP026 External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block vs. Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:A Randomized Prospective Study.

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a minimally invasive procedure, pain may occur in the postoperative period. The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (sTAP) block has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic surgery. External oblique intercostal plane (EOIP) block has also been proposed as a novel technique to provide analgesia for upper abdominal surgeries. Our study aims to investigate the effect of EOIP block on postoperative pain score and opioid consumption in LC compared to sTAP block.

After Ethical board approval, 80 patients were randomized to receive either EOIP or sTAP block. Bilateral blocks were performed with 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine in both groups after the induction of general anesthesia. All groups received standard general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Patients were evaluated in the PACU and postoperatively at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hours. Pain scores and opioid consumption were measured.

There was no statistical difference between VAS scores at rest and active movement at all measurement times (p>0.05). Opioid consumption in the first 4 hours was less in the sTAP group than in the EOIP group (p=0.039) However, there was no statistical difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours (p=0.215). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of rescue analgesia or first analgesic need (p>0.05).

After LC, the analgesic effect of the EIOB block is not superior to the STAP block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption. EOIB can easily be used as part of multimodal analgesia in LC procedures.
Sumeyye AL, Ali AHISKALIOGLU, Yunus Emre KARAPINAR (Erzurum, Turkey), Ahmet Murat YAYIK, Muhammed Enes AYDIN, Erkan Cem CELIK, Elif ORAL AHISKALIOGLU
10:10 - 10:15 #42400 - EP027 Simulated-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal block: Determining the learning curve and transference to real patient.
EP027 Simulated-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal block: Determining the learning curve and transference to real patient.

This study aimed to determine the learning curve for an ultrasound-guided popliteal block and the transference of this training to a real patient situation.

After approval by the ethics committee, ten first-year anesthesia residents were recruited to participate in a simulated-based training program to perform a single shot in plane popliteal block. (NCT06081790) Training consisted of 10 individual sessions, with direct feedback from the instructor, with a specific Laerdal® sciatic popliteal block phantom, lasting one hour and distributed weekly. At the end of each session, the resident’s performance was assessed. Residents were videotaped while performing the block, which was to be evaluated using a validated global rating scale (GRS). Additionally, a tracking motion device (ICSAD) attached to the operator's hands recorded the total distance traveled by both hands (Total Path Length=TPL) and total procedure time (TPT). One week later, the same assessment was done on a real patient.

Ten residents completed the training and the assessments. Median values of GRS scores significantly improved from 14 to 28 through the training (p=0.02) (Figure 1). Regarding ICSAD scores, TPT improved from 126 to 59.5 seconds (p=0.004), and TPL improved from 11.06 to 9.3 meters (p=0.432). We found no significant differences between the last simulated session and the subsequent measurement in an actual patient.

This simulation-based training program significantly improves residents’ proficiency in an ultrasound-guided popliteal block. The learning curve plateaued at session 7, and this improvement was transferred to the real patient setting.
Pablo MIRANDA, Andrea ARANEDA, Natalia MOLINA, Felipe MIRANDA, Christopher MORRISON, Marcia CORVETTO (Santiago, Chile), Fernando ALTERMATT
10:15 - 10:20 #42660 - EP028 A really Cool Stick: The new financially viable and environmentally-friendly alternative in modern obstetric anaesthesia.
EP028 A really Cool Stick: The new financially viable and environmentally-friendly alternative in modern obstetric anaesthesia.

Ethyl chloride spray is the mainstay of assessment of neuroaxial blockade in obstetric anaesthesia, but its use is controversial when more sustainable, greener and we argue, cheaper, alternatives are available, such as the CoolSticks.

This project combined a literature review, user satisfaction survey and a quarterly review of financial implications after CoolSticks were used to assess neuroaxial blockade instead of Ethyl chloride spray.

During the period of January – April 2024, CoolSticks were used in obstetric theatres instead of Ethyl Chloride spray at our trust, saving 1676.84KgCO2e and £2095.02 compared with the previous quarter (excluding the one-off purchase cost of the CoolSticks). Our user satisfaction survey showed 97% of obstetric anaesthetists were confident with the use of the CoolSticks for assessing dermatomal level, with a 100% of patients accepting its use clinically.

We established that CoolSticks were superior to Ethyl chloride spray in both cost effectiveness and user satisfaction, whilst removing the health risks associated with the use of the spray. Due to the success of the CoolSticks, it is now used as the first line method of assessing neuraxial block at our obstetric unit. Our goal is now to role out the use of CoolSticks trust-wide, including areas such as orthopaedics and trauma, to help reduced anaesthetic-related environmental pollution whist saving funds.
Victoria MILLINGTON (Wolverhampton, United Kingdom), Yoshimi DR ITO, Tina DR VAZ
10:20 - 10:25 #42713 - EP029 Review Article: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block- An effective alternative to conventional anesthetic options for Anorectal & Lower limb surgeries.
EP029 Review Article: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block- An effective alternative to conventional anesthetic options for Anorectal & Lower limb surgeries.

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) was introduced in 2016 as an analgesic block for thoracic neuropathic pain. Later, it was incorporated as one of the technics of multi-modal analgesia for peri-operative pain control in thoracic surgeries. Following that Lumbar ESPB emerged, which is widely being used as an analgesic & anesthetic block for spine, abdomen, inguinal and lower limb surgeries. Recent development is Sacral ESPB which is being used as an analgesic and anesthetic block for Ano-rectal, sacral, and hip surgeries. We would like to explore further on the anesthetic potential of sacral ESPB, as it is a novel technic, and it can be beneficial in high-risk patients for the conventional methods of Anesthesia.

We reviewed all the articles which were published about Sacral ESPB, as an anesthetic block. We could find a Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Feasibility Study which included 10 patients who underwent sacral reconstructive surgeries, as case report which included 2 patients who underwent ano-rectal surgeries and another case report which included a patient who underwent hip surgery, solely under sacral erector spinae plane block.

All the above patients tolerated the procedures very well with minimal sedation and they had effective post-operative analgesia as well.

Sacral erector spinae plane block can be effectively used as an anesthetic technic in patients undergoing sacral, anorectal & hip surgeries. However, most of the information is available only from case reports. We need further RCTs to establish their effectiveness as an anesthetic block.
Neethu ARUN (Doha, Qatar), Chitrambika P KRISHNANDAS, Yasser MOHAMED REDA ABASS TOBLE

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S6
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 6

Chairperson: David MOORE (Pain Specialist) (Chairperson, Dublin, Ireland)
10:00 - 10:05 #40794 - EP031 Continuous Tunneled Infraclavicular Nerve Catheter for Palliative Management of Critical Limb Ischemia.
EP031 Continuous Tunneled Infraclavicular Nerve Catheter for Palliative Management of Critical Limb Ischemia.

Critical limb ischemia is limb pain occurring at rest or impending limb loss as a result of lack of blood flow to the affected extremity. CLI pain is challenging to control despite multimodal pharmacologic analgesia and surgical intervention. We describe the successful use of an infraclavicular nerve catheter to control severe refractory ischemic upper limb pain in a patient with metastatic lung cancer for whom surgical and pharmacological intervention was unsuccessful.

A 56-year-old female with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma was admitted with left sided finger pain and discolouration. CT left upper limb angiogram demonstrated severe focal stenosis of the proximal left subclavian artery, compounded by acute arterial occlusion of left radial and ulnar arteries on ultrasound scan. She was commenced on intravenous heparin and underwent surgery emergently. Unfortunately, attempts at re-establishing flow down the ulnar artery were unsuccessful. She subsequently developed dry gangrene and experienced severe neuropathic pain.

Despite opioid escalation, rotation and use of neuropathic adjuncts and non-pharmacological management with music therapy, her pain was poorly controlled. Opioid escalation was limited by opioid toxicity which manifested as drowsiness with myoclonic jerks. A tunneled infraclavicular brachial plexus catheter was then performed and ran at 4ml/hr of 0.2% Ropivacaine. The patient reported pain relief and was transitioned off opioids. She remained comfortable and subsequently demised.

Ultrasound-guided regional techniques are a promising therapeutic option especially with failed surgical interventions for cancer pain. Future research into coordinating access to such procedures in the inpatient, emergency department and hospice settings may be beneficial.
Jacklyn YEK (Singapore, Singapore), Nicodemus OEY, Christopher LIU, Nithia ANGAMUTHU
10:05 - 10:10 #41168 - EP032 Association between uncontrolled pain on hospital discharge day and 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions for surgical patients at a tertiary cancer hospital.
EP032 Association between uncontrolled pain on hospital discharge day and 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions for surgical patients at a tertiary cancer hospital.

Unplanned readmissions following discharge are burdensome to patients, family, and health care systems. This study aimed to investigate whether uncontrolled pain on discharge-day increased the likelihood of unplanned readmissions in a surgical population at a tertiary cancer hospital.  

This quality improvement retrospective study analyzed adult (age ≥ 18 years) inpatient data including pain assessments during hospitalization and discharge over a 12-month period, yielding a total of 249,458 inpatient hospital days and 26,677 hospital discharges (alive), of this 7993 were surgical discharges. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day unplanned readmissions for any reason. We defined uncontrolled-pain on the day of discharge in two ways ─ a) documentation of ≥3 consecutive severe-pain scores (≥7 on 0-10 scale) (severe-pain-3C); and b) severe-pain documented as the last score prior to discharge (≥7 on 0-10 scale) (severe-pain-L).

On discharge-day, the frequency of surgical patients discharged with uncontrolled-pain were 3.2% and 3.5% for severe-pain-3c and severe-pain-L, respectively. Figure-1 demonstrates monthly trends for uncontrolled pain during hospitalization and discharge-day, which remained stable. The overall 30-day hospital readmission rate for surgical patients was 9.5% (Figure-1). The odds-ratio for 30-day hospital readmission with uncontrolled pain on discharge was 2.69 (1.99 - 3.63), P< 0.0001 for severe-pain-3C and 2.95 (2.182-3.98), P < 0.0001 for severe-pain-L(Figure-2) and adjusted odds ratio (Figure-3).

Uncontrolled pain on discharge was shown to be positively associated with 30-day all-cause readmission. These findings support the need for further research, including the development of targeted discharge planning interventions that prioritize timely follow-up and management of post-discharge pain
Keyuri POPAT (Houston, USA), Marylou WARREN, Cheng LEE, Shalini DALAL
10:10 - 10:15 #41342 - EP033 Intrathecal drug delivery system implantation in a patient with von Willebrand disease.
EP033 Intrathecal drug delivery system implantation in a patient with von Willebrand disease.

Introduction: Implementing an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) in a patient diagnosed with von Willebrand disease (vWD) necessitates meticulous planning due to the high risk of bleeding complications.

Case report: This case involved a 55-year-old woman previously diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome. Initially, she underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) without incident. However, after 28 months, the device was removed due to malfunctioning electrodes, and she opted for an IDDS. Following SCS removal, epidural patient-controlled analgesia was administered as a bridging therapy until the IDDS could be implanted. Compared with the SCS procedures, significant bleeding occurred during this phase. Although the patient had cirrhosis, her liver function and coagulation profiles were normal at the time. Nonetheless, an elevated PFA-100 test prompted referral to a hematologist, who suspected vWD. The hematologist recommended pre-procedural intravenous administration of a mixture of 0.3 ug/kg desmopressin and 50 mL normal saline over 30 to 40 minutes. Additionally, the use of cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was advised if there was any history of bleeding. Given her recent frequent bruising, two pints of FFP were administered. After the preoperative administration of desmopressin in the waiting room and the initiation of FFP, she was transferred to the operating room where the procedure was performed under aseptic conditions without any complications.

Conclusion: With careful preoperative preparation and vigilant perioperative management, IDDS implantation in patients with vWD can be conducted safely and effectively, mitigating the inherent risks associated with this condition.
Junmo PARK (Daegu, Republic of Korea)
10:15 - 10:20 #42466 - EP034 Bilateral ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block as the main anesthetic technique for umbilical hernia repair surgery in a high-risk patient.
EP034 Bilateral ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block as the main anesthetic technique for umbilical hernia repair surgery in a high-risk patient.

To report a case of a bilateral ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block used as the main anesthetic technique in a patient with ASA score III undergoing umbilical hernia repair surgery.

A 75-year-old patient with a history of severe COPD (FEV-1 Pred. = 36%), pulmonary hypertension (PASP = 60mmHg), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and a BMI of 40.4 kg/m2, came in for umbilical hernia repair surgery. Due to the patient’s significant perioperative risks, a bilateral ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block was elected as the main anesthetic technique. Preoperatively, under sterile conditions, with the patient in supine position, a low-frequency curvilinear transducer was placed transversely above the umbilicus approximately 1 cm lateral to the midline. The rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) and posterior rectus sheath were identified. The needle was inserted in-plane and guided through the RAM until the tip was placed posterior to the RAM and anterior to the posterior sheath, where 25ml of ropivacaine 0,375% was administered. The technique was repeated on the contralateral side.

Sensory block of dermatomes T9-T11 was achieved. The surgery was well tolerated with minimal IV sedation (20mg of ketamine and 2 mg of midazolam) and additional local infiltration of 20ml lidocaine 1,5%. No adverse effects were recorded.

Bilateral ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block is an effective regional technique, allowing this high-risk patient to undergo umbilical hernia repair surgery, while avoiding general anesthesia and central neuraxial blockade.
Olga KLAVDIANOU (Athens, Greece), Theodoros MILOUSIS, Marianna KARATHANOU, Demetra SOLOMOU, Evmorfia STAVROPOULOU, Tilemachos PARASKEVOPOULOS
10:20 - 10:25 #42480 - EP035 Capsaicine patch as an approach to secondary erythromelalgia related pain.
EP035 Capsaicine patch as an approach to secondary erythromelalgia related pain.

Erythromelalgia, a rare disorder categorized as an orphan disease, presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The disease manifests in episodic flares characterized by burning pain, erythema, and elevated skin temperature, primarily affecting the extremities, particularly hands and feet. Two etiologies are recognized: primary erythromelalgia, with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, and secondary erythromelalgia, which is often associated with underlying conditions such as neoplasms. The pathophysiology of erythromelalgia is likely due to a complex interplay between neural and vascular dysregulation. Unfortunately, most cases demonstrate limited responsiveness to pharmacological interventions, and the efficacy of pain management strategies exhibits substantial variability.

A 69-year-old male with a history of neuroendocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail – surgical removed – and low-risk MGUS of the IgG lambda subtype, was referred to a chronic pain consultation for management of neuropathic pain associated with erythromelalgia. Despite prior trials of various pharmacological interventions, including treatment for the underlying conditions, the patient reported minimal improvement. Application of a capsaicin 8% patch to the hands and feet for a 60-minute duration was proposed as a potential treatment modality.

Following the initial application, the patient reported a sustained improvement in both pruritus and burning complaints for a period of six weeks. During treatment, supplementary applications of the capsaicin 8% patch was done with an interval of eight weeks, resulting in further symptomatic improvement.

The capsaicin 8% patch emerges as a promising therapeutic modality in the management of secondary erythromelalgia. Notably, each application appears to confer progressively longer durations of pain relief.
Guariento LUCIANA, Nuno TORRES (Lisbon, Portugal), Pedro BRANQUINHO, Teresa FONTINHAS
10:25 - 10:30 #42704 - EP036 Analysis of Postoperative Pain Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.
EP036 Analysis of Postoperative Pain Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.

Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery, in terms of early discharge time and reducing the risk of complications.

After approval of ethic commitee (2024/58), between April 01, 2023 and April 01, 2024, pediatric patients who underwent thoracotomy were listed and retrospective data were obtained. Demographic data, type of surgery, duration of surgery, postoperative pain modality, pain scores within 24 hours, hospital discharge time were recorded from the patients' files.

A total of 18 patients, 66.7% (12) male and 33.3% (6) female, were included in the study. The ages of the patients ranged from 0.1 (28 days) to 17 years with a mean age of 11 years and a median age of 14 years. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was performed in 77.8% and thoracotomy in 22.2%. The most common indications for surgery were bulla excision with 44.5% (8 patients), diagnostic thoracoscopy with 16.7% and empyema drainage and hydatid cyst with 11.1%. Postoperative block was performed in 38.9%, erector spina plane block in 71.4% and serratus anterior procedure in 28.6%. The 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hour resting VAS scores of the patients who underwent block procedure decreased over time, while dexmedotomidine infusion and ketamine infusion were given to two patients who could not be evaluated. Post-op discharge time (days) and length of hospital stay were 7 (2-30), 11 days (3-59) (median, min-max), respectively.

Further research and implementation of tailored pain management protocols are warranted to enhance postoperative recovery and overall patient satisfaction in this population.
Ferda YAMAN, Reyhan AKKURT (ESKİŞEHİR, Turkey), Dilek CETINKAYA

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP01S7
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 1 - Station 7

Chairperson: Lara RIBEIRO (Anesthesiologist Consultant) (Chairperson, Braga-Portugal, Portugal)
10:00 - 10:05 #41275 - EP037 Association between postoperative analgesia and length of hospital stay after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia.
EP037 Association between postoperative analgesia and length of hospital stay after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia.

Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), for malignant pleural mesothelioma is maximally invasive surgeries, which causes the prolonged length of hospitalization after surgery. Previous studies reported that regional anesthesia in addition to general anesthesia likely contribute to shorten hospital stay after surgery with reduction of acute postoperative pain. Association between the continuous intertransverse process block for postoperative analgesia and the length of hospital stay after P/D, however, has not been evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the association between postoperative analgesia using continuous intertransverse process block and shorter postoperative stay after P/D.

In a single-institutional observational study, adult patients undergoing P/D under general anesthesia with single-injection regional block, who received either continuous intertransverse process block or continuous intravenous (IV) fentanyl infusion after surgery for postoperative analgesia, were enrolled from March 2022 to February 2023. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and length of hospital stay.

In all patients (n=60), postoperative analgesia was performed using either continuous intertransverse process block in patients (n=19) or continuous IV fentanyl infusion (n=41).The result revealed shorter length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly associated with continuous intertransverse process block (P=0.007). In subgroup analysis, Both C-reactive protein level on postoperative day (POD) 3 was lower (P=0.017), and postoperative pain on POD 3 was lower (P=0.045) in patients with continuous intertransverse process block.

Postoperative analgesia using continuous intertransverse process block is likely associated with the reduction of the length of hospital stay after P/D under general anesthesia.
Mayuu KOBATA (Nishinomiya, Japan), Munetaka HIROSE, Hiroai OKUTANI, Kenta TAKEDA, Takeshi IDE, Akane KIDO, Ryusuke UEKI
10:05 - 10:10 #42534 - EP038 Impact of simulation-based regional anesthesia training using live-anesthetized porcine models in enhancing anesthesiologists' proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided plan A blocks.
EP038 Impact of simulation-based regional anesthesia training using live-anesthetized porcine models in enhancing anesthesiologists' proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided plan A blocks.

Background: Adopting ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) is challenged by the need for standardized training, particularly in resource-limited settings like the Philippines. Simulation-based workshops using live-anesthetized porcine models present an innovative approach to enhance anesthesiologists' proficiency in UGRA, potentially improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of simulation-based training using live-anesthetized porcine models in enhancing anesthesiologists' proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided Plan-A blocks.

Methods: Following Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, this retrospective, quasi-experimental study used the responses from a validated survey of 29 anesthesiologists of different skill levels who participated in a workshop conducted at SLMC-BGC in October 2023 aimed at improving proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided Plan-A Blocks using live-anesthetized porcine models. Their demographic characteristics and pre- and post-workshop survey responses were gathered and quantitatively analyzed.

Results: Prior to the workshop, the proficiency of the anesthesiologists was measured in terms of basic sonoanatomy, ergonomics, equipment preparation, image acquisition, needle manipulation, optimal needle tip position, hydrolocation, overall confidence and anxiety level were all on the average. After the workshop, all these variables significantly increased to a high level (p <.001), while their overall anxiety level significantly decreased to a low level (p =.023).

Conclusions: The study underscores the value of simulation-based training in enhancing the proficiency of anesthesiologists in UGRA. The positive outcomes suggest that these models could be a potential educational tool integrated into regional anesthesia training modules, positively impacting patient safety and quality of care delivered in the Philippines and similar settings
Alexis Katrina DE LA VICTORIA (Philippines, Philippines), Samantha Claire BRAGANZA, Emmanuel BRAGANZA, Wilgelmyna AMBAT
10:10 - 10:15 #42562 - EP039 Perioperative peripheral nerve blockade and acute pain management in traumatic limb amputations – a single-centre, retrospective observational study.
EP039 Perioperative peripheral nerve blockade and acute pain management in traumatic limb amputations – a single-centre, retrospective observational study.

Limb amputations are a significant consequence of major trauma, and can result in acute and chronic pain. Acute pain management is crucial for recovery and rehabilitation. Severe postoperative pain is a risk factor for developing chronic post-surgical pain, and is potentially modifiable. Evidence shows peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) reduces perioperative opiate consumption. Some studies suggest regional anaesthesia may decrease risk of chronic pain, but they are small and not specific to major trauma. This study aimed to identify acute benefits using PNB in major trauma patients undergoing limb amputations.

This retrospective study reviewed all patients who underwent limb amputation under Trauma and Orthopaedics at our tertiary centre between 21/07/2020 and 19/10/2023. We reviewed case notes to identify intraoperative analgesia, pre-operative and postoperative opiate requirements, and postoperative function qualified as engagement with physiotherapy.

69 patients were identified (64 lower limb amputation, 5 upper limb amputation). Surgical indications included traumatic injury (n=42), osteomyelitis (n=26), and chronic pain (n=1). 33% (n=23) received PNB catheter, 42% (n=29) received PNB single-shot, and 25% (n=17) did not get PNB.

This observational study demonstrated reduction in postoperative opiate consumption in patients receiving PNB, with lowest consumption in those receiving PNB catheter. PNB patients had higher rate of engagement with physiotherapy postoperatively. Limitations to this study were small cohort size, varied surgical indications and the no PNB group may have included more unwell or multiple injured patients. More data is needed to establish benefits of PNB.
Christiana PAGE (GLASGOW, United Kingdom), Rebecca VERE, Louise MANSON, Stephen HICKEY
10:15 - 10:20 #42583 - EP040 Nalbuphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section.
EP040 Nalbuphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section.

An ideal analgesic regimen after Caesarean Section should provide high-quality maternal analgesia with minimal adverse effects, facilitating a prompt return to normal function. This study evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nalbuphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.

Fifty parturients, aged 22-46 years old, weighing 50-80 kg, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for caesarean section with spinal anesthesia, were enrolled in this study. A bolus of nalbuphine 10 mg was intravenously injected as a loading dose at the post anesthetic care unit. PCIA was performed after this bolus dose. PCIA pump solution contained 120 mg nalbuphine diluted to 120 ml with normal saline. The pump was set up with a background infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h, 2 ml bolus dose and 15 min lockout interval. The VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity and uterine contraction pain, Ramsay sedation scores and adverse reactions were observed within 24 h after surgery.

The VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity and uterine contraction pain were all ≤4 points, the Ramsay scores were maintained at 2-3 points, hemodynamic parameters were maintained in the normal range, and no adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, hyperhidrosis, dizziness, pruritus, and respiratory depression occurred.

PCIA with nalbuphine given, according to the method mentioned above, has good feasibility when used for analgesia following caesarean section.
Christos TSANTIKOS (, Greece), Vasilios VASILOPOULOS, Emmanouil GANITIS, Konstantinos HALASTARAS, Venetsanos KOLOKOURIS, Evgenia THOMAIDI, Eleni LOGOTHETI
10:20 - 10:25 #42805 - EP041 Nociception Level Index Guided Perioperative Pain Management in Paediatric Patients.
EP041 Nociception Level Index Guided Perioperative Pain Management in Paediatric Patients.

The nociception level index (NOL) is a novel nociception monitor, validated for adults, which has recently proved to detect the nociceptive stimuli in paediatrics that still waits for the clinical significance of this opportunity for the nonverbal age (1,2,3). In this case series, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the NOL monitor in guiding adequate perioperative analgesia in paediatrics and observe the relation between the NOL and the behavioural pain assessment scales (FLACC, CHIPPS).

After informed parenteral consent, thirteen cases received general anaesthesia to receive fracture surgery under NOL monitorization with a standard pain management protocol of 10 mg/kg (IV) paracetamol and 0,025 mg/kg morphine (IV). Additional morphine bolus doses were applied if only intraoperative NOL were over 25 or decided based on hemodynamics. Postoperative pain was evaluated using FLACC and CHIPPS scores at the PACU, 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours after surgery. A rescue analgesic was given if the pain score was four or higher.

The demographic data present 13 cases (Table 1). Intraoperative analgesic doses were only needed when NOL was over 25 (Table 2). There was no time when hemodynamic changes indicated pain, and the NOL value was low. Postoperative scores were compatible with low NOL before arousal except for cases 8 and 10, having a high FLACC score with a low CHIPPS at the same time.

NOL guidance would be valuable for ensuring intraoperative analgesia for nonverbal pediatric patients. However, additional randomized controlled analyses are needed to validate NOL monitoring in specific age groups.
Berna CALISKAN (Istanbul, Turkey), Dilara Pınar DAGLAR
10:25 - 10:30 #42835 - EP042 Combination therapy for Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain: a clinical retrospective study.
EP042 Combination therapy for Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain: a clinical retrospective study.

Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP) is complex, both in its diagnosis and in its treatment, which currently lacks a gold standard. Recent studies approached the idea that an imbalance in Dopamine release and in D1,D2 receptors expression could be involved in chronic pain, rather than a simple Dopamine depletion. It was in fact demonstrated tjat there is an increase in D2 receptor availability and a decrease in D1/D2 ratio in the striatal dopaminergic system of PIFP animal models. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of treatment with amitriptyline–perphenazine (a postsynaptic inhibitor of dopamine receptors) association in patients with severe PIFP.

In 2021, 31 patients with severe PIFP were given a regimen dose of amitriptyline–perphenazine, ranging between 10/2 mg and 20/4 mg. All patients were retrospectively analyzed for their pain intensity using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and for their quality of life using a SF-36 questionnaire. Non-normal distributed NRS results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test for paired data, whereas normally distributed SF-36 questionnaire results were analyzed using the t-test for paired data. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Pain values, frequency of acute episodes and quality of life were found to be significantly improved. See tab 1.

The amitriptyline-perphenazine combination seems to be effective and well-tolerated by patients with PIFP, leading to a whole new therapeutic prospective. It is abundantly clear that dopaminergic pathways play a key role in pain modulation, whereas the underlying mechanisms have yet to be understood, requiring further investigation
Maurizio MARCHESINI, Silvia NATOLI, Cesare BONEZZI, Laura DEMARTINI, Giulia TOPI (Pavia, Italy)
10:30

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A11
10:30 - 12:20

NETWORKING SESSION
Recent papers that might change the clinical practice
PERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCKS (PNBs)

Chairperson: Barbara VERSYCK (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Turnhout, Belgium)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Barbara VERSYCK (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Turnhout, Belgium)
10:35 - 10:57 Use of GLP1 agonists and implications for regional anesthesia: compilation of a few articles. Oya Yalcin COK (EDRA Part I Vice Chair, EDRA Examiner, lecturer, instructor) (Keynote Speaker, Adana, Türkiye, Turkey)
10:57 - 11:19 Comparison between supra-inguinal fascia Iliaca and pericapsular nerve group blocks on postoperative pain and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Emine Aysu SALVIZ (Attending Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, St. Louis, USA)
11:19 - 11:41 The anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve innervates cutaneous and deep surgical incisions in total knee arthroplasty. Siska BJORN (Resident) (Keynote Speaker, Aarhus, Denmark)
11:41 - 12:03 Are psychedelics the answer to chronic pain?: a review of current literature. Alain BORGEAT (Senior Research Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Zurich, Switzerland)
12:03 - 12:20 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B11
10:30 - 11:20

ASK THE EXPERT
POCUS in obstetric anesthesia

Chairperson: Nuala LUCAS (Speaker) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Nuala LUCAS (Speaker) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
10:35 - 11:05 POCUS in obstetric anesthesia. Peter VAN DE PUTTE (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Bonheiden, Belgium)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C12
10:30 - 11:20

LIVE DEMONSTRATION
Blocks above the clavicle

Demonstrators: Eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Demonstrator, Lausanne, Switzerland), Sebastien BLOC (Anesthésiste Réanimateur) (Demonstrator, Paris, France)
South Hall 1A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D12
10:30 - 11:00

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Pharmacology

Chairperson: Christophe PERRUCHOUD (Medical chief officer) (Chairperson, Geneva, Switzerland)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Christophe PERRUCHOUD (Medical chief officer) (Keynote Speaker, Geneva, Switzerland)
10:35 - 10:55 Pharmacokinetics & Pharmacodynamics of PNB drugs for dummies. Jens BORGLUM (Clinical Research Associate Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Copenhagen, Denmark)
10:55 - 11:00 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E12
10:30 - 11:00

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Complications

Chairperson: Axel SAUTER (consultant anaesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Oslo, Norway)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Axel SAUTER (consultant anaesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Oslo, Norway)
10:35 - 10:55 #43502 - E12 Complications and Mitigation in Regional Anesthesia.
Complications and Mitigation in Regional Anesthesia.

Complications and mitigation in Regional Anesthesia

 

 

In 1996 Stephan Kapral M.D. had the great idea, after he had participated in an echocardiography workshop, that nerve structures could also be scanned and subsequently be blocked by using ultrasound techniques. From that time on the ultrasound guided technique to block nerves became one of the most successful interventions in the entire field of anesthesia. Today USRA provides a very safe technique for our patients without using general anesthesia for a variety of surgical procedures.

Regional anesthesia has various advantages over general anesthesia, such as targeted pain relief with less side effects, reduced perioperative morbidity, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays and enhanced postoperative analgesia. But, like any other medical procedure, regional anesthesia is not excluded from certain complications, which every anesthetist should be aware of. Complications in regional anesthesia include anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), infection, hematoma, cardiovascular disturbances and allergies. This package of complications is quite similar to all other interventional anesthetic procedures and is all well known. In this abstract the focus is targeted at another serious complication namely the nerve injury.

These nerve damages caused by different circumstances can have dramatic consequences for the patient and also for the anesthetist. 

 

The majority of axons of the peripheral nerve system are covered by Schwann cells. These myelinated axons are bundled in fascicles surrounded by connective tissue layers called “perineurium”. Within the fascicles the connective tissue layers are called “endoneurium”.

Groups of fascicles of an entire nerve are covered by the epineurium. This sheath is the thickest and its collagen fibers are similar to the fibers of the dura.

The knowledge of this anatomical neural multi-layer sheath construction network is essential to understand the different types of nerve damage, which are assigned to two different classifications.

 

 

 

 

In daily practice the Seddon classification is more common. Nerve injury, as mentioned above, can lead to very severe complications. It is the most common complication in regional anesthesia. Starting with transient sensoric deficits, which are classified as Neuropraxia, with myelin damage and conduction reduction (s.a.) with a very good prognosis for complete recovery, up to a severe neurotmesis with a complete transection of the axon, myelin and endoneurium. Fortunately this usually does not happen in regional anesthesia. It is usually observed after massive trauma, sharp injuries or intraneural injection of noxious drugs. The incidence of nerve injury (NI) in RA in general is very varying due to the fact that there are a lot of heterogenous studies with “unsharp” definitions. The incidence of long-lasting peripheral nerve injury (PNI) ranges from 2 to 4 per 10,000 patients [7,8]. In a study by Urban et al., mild paresthesias were not uncommon on postoperative day 1, occurring in 19% of axillary blocks and 9% of interscalene blocks. After 2 weeks, the incidence of neuropraxia fell to 5% in the axillary group and 3% in the interscalene group. After 4 weeks, only 0.4% of patients experienced symptoms . Overall, transient deficits lasting up to 2 weeks are not uncommon and can range from 8.2 to 15%. The study of Lupu et al. found out that using ultrasound guided technique nerve blocks with intraneural injections do not regularily result in permanent nerve damage. Interestingly there is no significant difference in postoperative neurologic symptoms comparing ultrasound technique versus stimulation technique

Such seemingly rare occurrences of PNB-related nerve injuries might be due to a lack of documentation (underreporting), improper follow-ups, or associated legal implications. Even the mildest, self-limiting, unintentional, and most frequent form of perioperative nerve injury (neuropraxia) can result in a medicolegal claim for extended hospitalization and additional treatment costs. It is also important to know that nerve injuries happen more often in the upper extremities than in lower extremities. The most injured nerve is the radial nerve in the upper limb, followed by the median and ulnar nerves, and the sciatic nerve in the lower limbs, followed by the peroneal and tibial nerves. 

This sequence is based on the fact that much more blocks are provided on the upper extremity and that e.g. the sciatic nerve contains a lot of connective protective tissue layers comparing to nerves of the brachial plexus. The spinal nerves of the ventral rami of C5, C6, etcc consist of nearly pure nerve structures with very few connective tissue layers. So touching these nerves with the tip of the needle will be remembered by the patients for ever. 

Nerve injuries can manifest as sensory or motor dysfunction, or both. Sensory dysfunction may present as numbness, tingling, or burning sensations, whereas motor dysfunction may present as weakness or paralysis of muscles supplied by the affected nerve. 

 

Risk factors for nerve injury are patient and/or surgery related but also anesthesia related. Patient related risk factors are numerous like age, gender (women>men), smoking, preexisting disorders and of course anticoagulation. There are also a lot of surgery related risk factors like patient’s position, compression (cast, tourniquet), ischaemia, haematoma, perioperative inflammation, infection etc.. Especially the tourniquet issue causes an ongoing endless debate between surgeons and anesthetists. There are conflicting data about duration and pressure level when using a tourniquet. Usually there are fixed values used in daily practice for any kind of surgical procedures and patients. The main features of tourniquet compression result in vascular permeability, intraneural edema and especially in lower leg surgery nerve degeneration, due to higher pressures. According to long-ago recommendations, the tourniquet pressure should not be more than 150 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure, and the duration should not exceed 90minutes, or a maximum of 120 minutes with a 10-15 minute deflation phase. 

 

Today we know how important it is to adapt the tourniquet pressure level to different operative settings. The widely used duration of 90 minutes has never been proven by studies, it has been more of a practical habit for decades. Now there are automatic pneumatic tourniquet devices available that are able to adapt the tourniquet pressure continuously with a predifined, adjustable value above the systolic blood pressure. 

The anesthetic related risk factors are the “4 H” (Hypotension, Hypothermia, Hypovolemia, Hypoxia) but also our needle skills, too deep sedation and last but not least the local anesthetics, which all of them especially combined can lead to nerve injuries.

Special attention should be given to  patients with diabetes mellitus, especially those with preexisting diabetic neuropathies, which indeed is the most common complication of this metabolic disorder. These patients are highly endangered to suffer from nerve injuries after a “failed” nerve block. The pathogenesis of this diabetic neuropathy is very complex. All the different biochemical cellular pathways lead to neural oxidative stress and subsequently to severe neural damage, which affects the myelin sheaths and also the axonal structures. The impaired vasculature and autoregulation are also very much involved to trigger diabetic neuropathy. The point is, that diabetic patients are at least twice as likely to require surgery than non-diabetics because of their comorbidities and the type of surgery performed. Other patients with preexisting diseases (metabolic, toxic, ischemic, etc...) who additionally suffer from nerve entrapment are on high risk for a double crush syndrome, especially when receiving nerve blocks.

To mitigate the risk of double crush syndrome in regional anesthesia, practitioners should be aware of the patient's prior neurological history. Patients with a history of peripheral neuropathy, whatever the reason is, should be evaluated for any signs of nerve compression, such as muscle weakness, sensory defects, or neuropathic pain, before and after the nerve block procedure. Generally, practitioners must be gentle during the procedure, minimizing the amount of pressure or manipulation applied to the patient's nerves. The best way to minimize neural damage is to train RA-skills as good as possible. It is very important to visualize the entire nerve including surrounding structures to avoid direct needle trauma to nerves or perforate close located vessels or other vulnerable structures. It is essential to provide structured professional training to improve fine motor skills because the learning curve in the beginning is quite flat. To visualize the needle in different angles and planes in a dynamic motion and at the same time focusing on the targeted nerve is very challenging in the beginning. Another challenging issue is learning anatomic structures from a 3- dimensional in a 2-dimensional model transmitted on a display. This cognitive challenge often leads to misinterpretations. All anesthesiology departments providing regional anesthesia should therefore implement structured programs for their interested colleagues starting with simple superficial located nerve blocks on the upper and lower extremity. For deep nerve blocks, where nerve visualization can be tricky, dual guidance technique, using ultrasound and nerve stimulator, is recommended. Using pressure monitoring devices to avoid intraneural injections is helpful, although this technique is not widely used because of the high extra costs. It is highly sensitive but lacks specificity. In other words, the absence of high injection pressure effectively rules out an intrafascicular injection. High opening injection pressure (>20 psi) determines the intrafascicular placement of the needle tip. Low opening pressure (

The needle selection is another very sensitive and much discussed topic among anesthetists. Using non-cutting blunt or short bevel tip (45°) needles are much less likely to penetrate epineurium and minimize nerve penetration. But they get easily bended, when piercing through rough skin. This can worsen visualization of the needle and can lead to unexpected nerve damage. Long-bevel tip needles (15°) are much sharper and therefore more likely to puncture epi- or even perineural structures. Self-explanatory the needle diameter is linked to the degree of nerve damage.

Summary: Complications in regional anesthesia are multifactorial and very complex. There are multiple surgical, anesthesiologic and patient related factors for nerve injury. The incidence of nerve damage in regional anesthesia varies significantly in a very low range. In most cases there are several combined factors that lead to a nerve damage. Histologically you will find damaged myelin layers and axonal degeneration. Fortunately this neuropraxia has the best outcome and perioperative neurological deficits will disappear completely in more than 95% of the cases. There are a lot of preprocedural precautions to provide good blocks and to avoid nerve injuries. Beginning with the medical explanation, consent of the patient, documentation of all the patients related factors, continuing in the holding area with monitoring, if necessary slight sedations, up to positioning of the patient and ergonomics of the anesthetist.  Then choosing the optimal technique with the correct needle under sterile conditions with the minimal dosage of local anesthetics required will avoid side effects or even complications like LATS, hematoma, infections and last but not least nerve injuries. But the key point to mitigate nerve damages are in fact the skills of well trained anesthetists preferably with the support of high quality US machines with high resolution to detect needle and targeted nerves very precisely. In case of poor visibility the provider can use stimulation technique and even go for triple guidance technique using pressure monitoring devices aswell. Keeping all these facts and procedures in mind will provide perfect blocks without any harm to our patients. 

 

References:

 

                  Macfarlane AJR, Prasad GA, Chan VWS, Brull R. Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome after total hip arthroplasty? A system- atic review. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:33545.  

                  Hadzic A, Karaca PE, Hobeika P, Unis G, Dermksian J, Yufa M, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks result in superior recovery profile compared with general anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:97681. This is a foundational manu- script that outlines the importance of nerve blocks compared to general anesthesia. compared with general anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy. 

                  Brull R, Hadzic A, Reina MA, Barrington MJ. Pathophysiology and etiology of nerve injury following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:47990. 

                  Franco CD. Connective tissues associated with peripheral nerves. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:3635. 

                  Seddon HJ: A classification of nerve injuries. Br Med J 1942;2: 237–239.

                  Sunderland S: A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain 1951;74:491–516.

                  Urban MK, Urquhart B. Evaluation of brachial plexus anesthesia for upper extremity surgery. Reg Anesth United States. 1994;19: 175–82. 

                  Sondekoppam RV, Tsui BCH. Factors associated with risk of neu- rologic complications after peripheral nerve blocks. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:64560.

                  Fredrickson MJ, Kilfoyle DH. Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective or- thopaedic surgery: a prospective study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:836– 44. 

                  Lupu CM, Kiehl T-R, Chan VWS, El-Beheiry H, Madden M, Brull R. Nerve expansion seen on ultrasound predicts histologic but not functional nerve injury after intraneural injection in pigs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:1329. 

Deschner S, Borgeat A, Hadzic A: Chapter 69. Neurologic complications of peripheral nerve blocks: mechanisms & management. NYSORA Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. Hadzic A (ed): McGraw-Hill Medical, New York; 2007. 1109-35. 

Albers JW, Pop-Busui R: Diabetic neuropathy: mechanisms, emerging treatments, and subtypes . Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014, 14:473. 10.1007/s11910-014-0473-5

Knowing It Before Blocking It,” the ABCD of the Peripheral Nerves: Part B (Nerve Injury Types, Mechanisms, and Pathogenesis) Kartik Sonawane 1 , Hrudini Dixit 2 , Navya Thota 1 , Tuhin Mistry 1 , Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian 

“Knowing It Before Blocking It,” the ABCD of the Peripheral Nerves: Part C (Prevention of Nerve Injuries)
Kartik Sonawane 1 , Hrudini Dixit 2 , Kaveri Mehta 3 , Navya Thota 1 , Palanichamy Gurumoorthi
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Marcus NEUMUELLER (Steyr, Austria)
10:55 - 11:00 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F12
10:30 - 11:00

TIPS & TRICKS
The difficult patient

Chairperson: Romualdo DEL BUONO (Member) (Chairperson, Milan, Italy)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Romualdo DEL BUONO (Member) (Keynote Speaker, Milan, Italy)
10:35 - 10:55 #43495 - F12 The Difficult Pain Patient – How to Handle Postoperative Analgesia.
The Difficult Pain Patient – How to Handle Postoperative Analgesia.

Ioanna Siafaka (1), Athina Vadalouka (2), Eleni Moka (3)

1. ANESTHESIA PAIN PALLIATIVE CARE, ATHENS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL GREECE, ATHENS, Greece
2. Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Centre, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece
3. Anaesthesiology Department, Creta Interclinic Hospital – Hellenic Healthcare Group, Heraklion, Greece


Chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting ≥3 months) is a debilitating disease that affects daily work and life activities for many adults worldwide, and has been linked with depression (1), Alzheimer disease and related dementias (2), higher suicide risk (3), and substance use and misuse (4). Research suggests that approximately 20% of adults worldwide, equivalent to over 1.5 billion individuals, suffer from chronic pain (5). Of those who live with chronic pain, 10.4–14.3% were found to have moderate–to –severe disabling chronic pain (6). 

Chronic pain patients can be especially difficult in management, because they develop: (a) maladaptive changes in their attitudes about ever regaining their health, (b) non–productive and even obstructive behaviors, (c) physiological and anatomic changes in the pain processing and transmission system (termed neuroplasticity), that essentially hardwire the pain response pattern. Chronic opioid use and neuropathic pain, independently decrease the set point threshold in the central nervous system, for a response to nociceptive input, such that patients with longstanding pain or opioid use, have an increased likelihood to experience pain from a remarkably low stimulus intensity (7). Also, difficult pain patients are frustrated with the medical system, experience dysfunction in their personal life, and are irritable and sleep deprived (8).

Chronic pain can make the management of acute pain challenging. It might be difficult and challenging to achieve adequate postoperative analgesia in patients who present for surgery with preexisting chronic pain. Patients presenting with anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and high levels of pain before surgery will be at increased risk of experiencing significant acute postoperative pain. Only one in four surgical patients receives adequate relief of acute pain (8). Undertreated acute pain may lead to the development of chronic pain syndromes in several patients (9).

Anaesthesiologists, surgeons, and other professionals involved in the care of this patient population must be aware of the physiological changes that occur and increase analgesic requirements. This population has altered perception of pain and reports higher pain scores in the postoperative setting than patients without preexisting chronic pain (10).

In the treatment of chronic pain, practitioners often propose multiple analgesics, such as sustained release and transdermal opioids, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in addition to interventional pain procedures (11). These chronic pain management approaches carry the risk of side effects and possible drug interactions, that need to be monitored in the postoperative setting. Chronic opioid users may have increased analgesic requirements postoperatively due to tolerance, dependence, and opioid–induced hyperalgesia (9).

Further, patients with chronic pain tend to be more sensitive to painful conditions. They may experience a flare of their underlying pain disorder and may be more physically deconditioned, thus making it more challenging to treat them postoperatively.

The guidelines on the management of postoperative pain set forth by the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia acknowledge the challenges of treating patients with a history of chronic opioid use. They recommend multimodal analgesia (MMA), or a variety of analgesic medications and techniques combined to target different mechanisms of action of pain receptors in the peripheral and central nervous systems. In this MMA regimen, acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs, in addition to opioids, are associated with less postoperative pain and opioid consumption versus opioids alone. They also recommend peripheral regional anaesthetic techniques, as part of the MMA regimen, in addition to neuraxial analgesia for major thoracic and abdominal procedures, especially for those with increased risk for cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities or prolonged ileus. Both are associated with decreased use of opioids and lower postoperative pain scores (12).

When standard pharmacological regimens are inadequate, or when treating difficult patients at high risk of experiencing uncontrolled postoperative pain, it is recommended to consult a pain management specialist to assist in perioperative pain management

Transdermal Opioids are an available treatment option for chronic pain, with the most commonly prescribed transdermal systems containing fentanyl or buprenorphine. If a patient is on a Fentanyl Patch preoperatively, it may be continued postoperatively. If the fentanyl patch is removed, equivalent opioid should be provided to meet the patient’s baseline analgesic requirement. Fentanyl patch is contraindicated in patients who are opioid naive, for use in mild, acute, postoperative, or intermittent pain. Regarding Buprenorphine Patches, evidence is mixed. Buprenorphine administered transdermally generally results in plasma concentrations lower than sublingual buprenorphine. It may be removed 12 hours prior to surgery or continued postoperatively (13).

Intrathecal Opioids via Implanted Pumps are used also for the management of difficult chronic pain. The Pain Specialist who manages the pump should be made aware of any planned procedure, and the device should be thoroughly investigated to obtain the drug name, dosage, frequency, and last fill date (14). The delivery of analgesic medications via pump should be maintained perioperatively when the pump does not physically interfere with the procedure. Conversion from intrathecal morphine dosing to oral dosing is impractical, so the administration of additional opioids should be done slowly and carefully. Pumps may contain baclofen, which has been reported to have a synergistic interaction with opioids, increasing their potency (10). Baclofen withdrawal is life–threatening, so it is imperative that the pump is functional postoperatively.

Spinal Cord Stimulation is a treatment option for adults with chronic pain of neuropathic origin. Patients with an implanted spinal cord stimulator (SCS) are therefore likely to present for other unrelated procedures. Postoperatively the device should be switched on and interrogated by the pain team to ensure functionality before discharge from the hospital. SCS have no role in the management of acute nociceptive pain, which should be managed by conventional means (15).

There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal perioperative management of chronic pain patients. Individual pain management should be determined by the acute pain team based on patient and surgical factors.

The creation and development of Transitional Pain Services will allow a safer more effective and smoother transition of the difficult patient into the outpatient setting at a time when inappropriate prescribing, medication misuse and opioid withdrawal could hinder the overall healing process.

 

REFERENCES

1.     Zis P, Daskalaki A, Bountouni I, Sykioti P, Varrassi G, Paladini A. Depression and chronic pain in the elderly: links and management challenges. Clin Interv Aging, 2017; 12: 709–220. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S113576 PMID:28461745

2.     Khalid S, Sambamoorthi U, Umer A, Lilly CL, Gross DK, Innes KE. Increased odds of incident Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias in presence of common non-cancer chronic pain conditions in Appalachian older adults. J Aging Health, 2022; 34: 158–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211036219 PMID:34351824)

3.     Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee. National Pain Strategy: a comprehensive population health-level strategy for pain. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 2016. https://www.iprcc.nih.gov/node/5/national-pain-strategy-report

4.     Ditre JW, Zale EL, LaRowe LR. A reciprocal model of pain and substance use: transdiagnostic considerations, clinical implications, and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2019; 15: 503–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095440 PMID:30566371

5.     Zimmer Z, Fraser K, Grol-Prokopczyk H, Zajacova A. A global study of pain prevalence across 52 countries: Examining the role of country-level contextual factors. Pain, 2022; 163(9): 1740 – 1750. https://doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002557

6.     Sarah E.E. MillsKaren P. Nicolson, and Blair H. Smith. Chronic pain: A review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies.  Br J Anaesth,2019; 123(2): e273–e283.

7.     Russell Davenport and John C. Rowlingson. Dealing With the Difficult Patient. https://www.asra.com/news-publications/asra-newsletter/newsletter-item/asra-news/2019/09/26/dealing-with-the-difficult-patient

8.     Paul S. Tumber. Optimizing perioperative analgesia for the complex pain patient: Medical and interventional strategies. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth, 2014; 61: 131–140. https://doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0073-x

9.     Natasa Grancaric, Woojin Lee, Madeline Scanlon. Postoperative Analgesia in the Chronic Pain Patient.Otolaryngol Clin N Am, 2020; 53: 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2020.05.013

10.  Gregory L. Barinsky, Erin Maggie Jones, Anna A. Pashkova, and Carolyn P. Thai. Postoperative Analgesia for the Chronic Pain Patient. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 79P. F. Svider et al. (eds.), Perioperative Pain Control: Tools for Surgeonshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56081-2_7

11.  Athina Vadalouca Evnomia Alexopoulou-Vrachnou Martina Rekatsina Irene Kouroukli Sousana Anisoglou Fani KremastinouZoi Gabopoulou  Panagiota Chloropoulou Georgia Micha Athanasia Tsaroucha Ioanna SiafakaThe Greek Neuropathic Pain Registry: The structure and objectives of the sole NPR in Greece. Pain Pract, 2022; 22(1): 47 – 56. https://doi:10.1111/papr.13049

12.  Roger Chou, Debra B. Gordon Y, Oscar A. de Leon-Casasola, et al. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. The Journal of Pain, 2016; 17(2): 131 – 157. Available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com


Ioanna SIAFAKA (Athens, Greece)
10:55 - 11:00 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G12
10:30 - 11:00

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Caudals

Chairperson: Nicholas PAPADOMANOLAKIS-PAKIS (Research) (Chairperson, Aarhus, Denmark)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Nicholas PAPADOMANOLAKIS-PAKIS (Research) (Keynote Speaker, Aarhus, Denmark)
10:35 - 10:55 Caudal Blocks. Markus STEVENS (anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
10:55 - 11:00 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
I13
10:30 - 12:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 3 - CHRONIC PAIN
Musculosceletal UG Interventional Procedures in Pain Medicine - Hip & Lower Extremity

WS Leader: Athmaja THOTTUNGAL (yes) (WS Leader, Canterbury, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 1: Periarticular Hip Injection - Trochanteric Bursa Injection. Ismael ATCHIA (Consultant Rheumatologist) (Demonstrator, Newcastle, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 2: Pericapsular Nerves Injection (Femoral, Obturator, Accessory Obturator). Ammar SALTI (Anesthesiologist and Pain Physician) (Demonstrator, abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 3: Genicular Nerves Injection. Thomas HAAG (Lead Consultant) (Demonstrator, Wrexham, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 4: Suprapatellar Bursa Injection - Posterior Capsule Injection. Joanna TOMLINSON (School of Anatomy) (Demonstrator, Bristol, United Kingdom)
220a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
FP10
10:30 - 11:25

CENTRAL NERVE BLOCKS
Free Papers 1

Chairperson: Brian KINIRONS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Galway, Ireland, Ireland)
10:30 - 10:37 #42594 - OP019 Minimal correlation between dose and duration of blockade following ropivacaine spinal anesthesia.
OP019 Minimal correlation between dose and duration of blockade following ropivacaine spinal anesthesia.

Ropivacaine has become more popular for spinal anesthesia due to a shorter duration of blockade than bupivacaine. We investigated the correlation between patient height, intrathecal ropivacaine dose, and block duration.

Retrospective study of adults receiving ropivacaine spinal anesthesia for elective total hip arthroplasty at one institution between 1/1/2000, and 12/31/2023. Collected variables included ropivacaine dose, patient height, time to full motor recovery by the modified Bromage scale, weight, age, and the use of IV dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine.

Out of 2063 records, 2034 had full data. Ropivacaine dose was 13.5 ± 1.9 [range 6 to 20 mg] and duration was 225.3 ± 62.0 [range 98 to 575 min]. Scatter plots as well as Pearson and Spearman correlation tests demonstrated weak positive correlations between duration, height and dose. There was also a weak correlation (0.21) between height and dose, suggesting that some anesthesiologists might adjust the dose based on weight. Multiple linear regression yielded a small R2 value (0.047), suggesting that dose and height explain only in small part the variability in duration.

There is a weak positive correlation between ropivacaine spinal dose and duration of motor blockade, while patient height has almost no correlation with motor block duration. Within the range of clinically used doses, most of the variability in duration appears related to the factors outside of the ropivacaine dose and patient height.
Jonathan LI, David FURGIUELE, Germaine CUFF, Kiran KAUR, Asim LAL, Navkawal MATTU, Arthur HERTLING (New York, USA)
10:44 - 10:51 #42450 - OP021 An experience with awake spinal anaesthesia in neonates undergoing surgeries at a tertiary care centre: a retrospective audit.
OP021 An experience with awake spinal anaesthesia in neonates undergoing surgeries at a tertiary care centre: a retrospective audit.

Awake regional anaesthesia (RA) is a potentially safer alternative to general anaesthesia (GA) for neonatal abdominal surgeries. Benefits include lower incidence of postoperative apnoea, neuroapoptosis and neurocognitive decline. We conducted a retrospective audit of the neonates undergoing surgeries under awake spinal anaesthesia, determining the efficacy and safety profile of the anaesthesia technique in the perioperative period.

It was a retrospective observational study of neonates undergoing abdominal surgeries under awake spinal anaesthesia over a 6 months period. 17 neonates were studied and their data analysed. Primary outcomes measured were the duration and adequacy of the motor blockade, the intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative apnoea. Secondary outcomes measured were attempts needed for successful spinal tap, need of sedatives, surgeon satisfaction and postoperative complications, if any.

Spinal anaesthesia was adequate for completion of surgeries in 76% of the patients. A bloody tap was encountered in 17% of the patients needing conversion to general anaesthesia. Haemodynamic stability was maintained in 70% of patients with brief periods of hypotension needing support in 5 patients. None of the children developed postoperative apnoea. Additional sedatives were needed in 23% of patients. Only one child desaturated till 88% intraoperatively needing oxygen supplementation. Surgeon satisfaction measured on a Likert Scale was very good in 70%.

Spinal anaesthesia seems effective in short duration abdominal surgeries in preterm as well as full term neonates with good perioperative stability. The success rate may improve in the hands of skilled paediatric anaesthesiologists and dedicated spinal needles.
Amrusha RAIPURE, Bhuvaneswari BALASUBRAMANIAN (Nagpur, India)
10:51 - 10:58 #41533 - OP022 Unilateral spinal anesthesia in hip fracture surgery for geriatric patients with high cardiovascular risk due to aortic stenosis is safe and effective.
OP022 Unilateral spinal anesthesia in hip fracture surgery for geriatric patients with high cardiovascular risk due to aortic stenosis is safe and effective.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a cause of mortality or morbidity. It complicates the selection and management of anesthetic procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, hemodynamic effects and postoperative outcome of unilateral spinal anesthesia (USA) in geriatric hip fractured patients with moderate or severe AS.

A retrospective observational study was conducted on geriatric highrisk patients with cardiac conditions who underwent surgery for hip fractures under unilateral spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine (6,5-7,5 mg). The study period spanned from January 2018 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were individuals with moderate to severe aortic stenosis, as defined by the American Heart Association Criteria. Data on demographic information, cardiac pathologies, hemodynamic data, motor and sensory block levels, perioperative complications, and mortality rates within the first month and between the 30th and 180th days were collected.

Mortality rates at the 30th day and 180th day were 8.9% (n:4) and 24,4% (n:11), respectively. T6 level was predominantly observed (44.4%). Motor and sensory block formation times averaged 7.56 and 4.84 minutes, respectively. Surgical procedures were performed mostly within 1 hour (66.7%), and complications were rare (11.1% hypotension). Initial analgesic effect showed a rapid resolution, with 64.4% of patients requiring analgesic within the first hour postoperatively.

In elderly patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis scheduled for noncardiac surgical procedures, undergoing preoperative multidisciplinary optimization, we posit that unilateral spinal anesthesia with ultra-low doses represents a safe and effective option.
Zeynep CAGIRAN, Kazım Koray OZGUL, Arman VAHABI, Omar ALJASIM, Semra KARAMAN, Nadir OZKAYIN, Kemal AKTUGLU, Nezih SERTOZ (ızmir, Turkey)
11:05 - 11:12 #42752 - OP024 Analgesic Efficacy of Retrolaminar Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgeries: A Case Series.
OP024 Analgesic Efficacy of Retrolaminar Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgeries: A Case Series.

Retrolaminar block is a thoracic truncal block, that produces analgesia for thoracic and abdominal wall surgeries. There is limited knowledge about the actual distribution of retrolaminar plane injectates. This series aimed to determine analgesic efficacy by measuring perioperative analgesic consumption and pain scores.

After informed consent, RLB was performed in a sitting position at the level of T4 with an injectate of 0.25% Ropivacaine and 1% lignocaine with adrenaline (30 ml). Once the patient awakened, the pain was assessed by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (MRS) score at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery. All the patients were connected to a PCA device so that they could self-administer fentanyl boluses. At 24 hours post-surgery the total analgesic consumption was noted and the Patient satisfaction score (PSS) was noted on a 5-point Likert scale.

Fifteen females with a mean(S.D.) age of 45.8(14.6) yrs, weight 60.7(13.6) kg, height 156.3(6.5) cm and BMI 25(5.5) kg/m2. The average duration of block performance was 2.43 minutes. The mean(S.D.) intraoperative and total 24-hour fentanyl requirement was 25.3(39.4) mcg and 35(40) mcg. Nine out of 15 patients did not require intraoperative fentanyl. The mean NRS in 24 hours was never more than 2.5 (fig 1). The average duration of the block lasted for 14.9(10.4) hours. The average patient satisfaction score was good.

Retrolaminar block can be used as an effective block for breast surgery with lower perioperative pain scores, lower total opioid consumption, and good patient satisfaction scores.
Debesh BHOI, Lipika SONI (Delhi, India), Nageswara Rao TANGIRALA, Nishant PATEL
11:12 - 11:19 #42787 - OP025 Incidence and Challenges of Epidural Analgesia Administration by Trainees in Parturients at a Belgian Tertiary Training Center.
OP025 Incidence and Challenges of Epidural Analgesia Administration by Trainees in Parturients at a Belgian Tertiary Training Center.

Epidural analgesia relies on the perception of the loss of resistance for needle placement in the epidural space. The ability to detect the loss of resistance may vary, which can lead to unintended dural punctures. This study aimed to determine the incidence of self-reported technical challenges encountered by trainees during epidural analgesia and whether the year of training predicts difficulty.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from parturients receiving epidural analgesia by anesthesiology trainees between March 1 and April 30, 2024. All trainees received theoretical and hands-on simulation training. We documented self-reported technical challenges, bone contact, number of attempts as well as trainees' level of training and patient characteristics. As per protocol, all patients were assessed for post-dural puncture headache the day after the epidural insertion.

Out of 146 epidurals performed by 26 trainees, 15 attempts (10%) were perceived as challenging, with bone contact in 13 (87%) cases. Thirty epidurals (20%) required at least two attempts and 5 (3% of all punctures, 33% of difficult punctures) needed three or more attempts. Challenging punctures required at least two attempts. The most commonly reported cause of difficulty was obesity with a median BMI of 32.4 kg/m². Interestingly, challenges and bone contact did not correlate with the level of training. No dural punctures were reported.

In this retrospective study, 10% of epidurals performed by trainees were challenging, with obesity being the most frequent cause. No correlation was found between the trainees' level of experience and the difficulty of the epidural technique.
Leander MANCEL (Leuven, Belgium), Astrid VAN LANTSCHOOT, William AERTS, Walter STAELENS, Sarah SHIBA, Amy BELBA, Imré VAN HERREWEGHE
CHAMBER HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
J13
10:30 - 12:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 4 - CHRONIC PAIN
UG Guided Treatment of Spinal Chronic Pain Conditions

WS Leader: Pavel MICHALEK (Deputy Director for Science, Research and Education) (WS Leader, Praha, Czech Republic)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 1: Cervical Radicular Pain - Selective Nerve Root Injection (Extraforaminal). Graham SIMPSON (Consultant in Anaesthetics and Pain Management) (Demonstrator, Exeter, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 2: Cervical Facet Pain - Cervical Medial Branch & Facet Joint Injections. Manfred GREHER (Medical Hospital Director and Head of Department) (Demonstrator, Vienna, Austria)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 3: Cervicogenic Headache - Third Occipital Nerve (TON) and Greater Occipital Nerve (GON) Injections. Andrzej DASZKIEWICZ (consultant) (Demonstrator, Ustroń, Poland)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 4: Lumbar Spine Pain - Mechanical Low Back Pain / Lumbar Medial - Branch and Facet Joint Injections, Lumbar Paraspinal Injections (ES, QLB - Thoracolumbar Fascia). Gustavo FABREGAT (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Valencia, Spain)
221a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
K13
10:30 - 12:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 2 - POCUS
POCUS in Perioperative Medicine

WS Leader: Hari KALAGARA (Assistant Professor) (WS Leader, Florida, USA)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 1: Ultrasound for Gastric Content Evaluation and Assessment. Mark CROWLEY (EDRA Faculty) (Demonstrator, Oxford, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 2: FOCUS (II) - Ejection Fraction & Aortic Stenosis. Valentina RANCATI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Lausanne, Switzerland)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 3: FOCUS (III) - Inferior Vena Cava (Collapsibility Index). Jan BOUBLIK (Assistant Professor) (Demonstrator, Stanford, USA)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 4: D - POCUS (Diaphragm Evaluation, Diaphragm Palsy, Weaning Test). Denisa ANASTASE (Head of the Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Senior Consultant Anesthesia and Intensive) (Demonstrator, Bucharest, Romania)
223a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
L13
10:30 - 12:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 2 - RA
PNBs for Lower Arm, Forearm and Hand Surgery

WS Leader: Morne WOLMARANS (Consultant Anaesthesiologist) (WS Leader, Norwich, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 1: Supraclavicular Nerve Block. Elena SEGURA (regional and pocus ultrasound rotation coordinator, acute pain unit coordinator) (Demonstrator, Viseu, Portugal)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 2: Infraclavicular Nerve Block. Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Demonstrator, Leuven, Belgium)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 3: Plexus block. Christian BERGEK (Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Gothenburg, Sweden)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 4: Musculocutaneous Nerve and Brachial Plexus Branches in the Arm and Forearm. Michal VENGLARCIK (Head of anesthesia) (Demonstrator, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
241

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
M13
10:30 - 12:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 3 - RA
Four Basic Blocks for Knee Surgery

WS Leader: Livija SAKIC (anaesthesiologist) (WS Leader, Zagreb, Croatia)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 1: Femoral Nerve Block. Svetlana GALITZINE (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Oxford, United Kingdom)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 2: Adductor Canal Block (ACB). Ismet TOPCU (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, İzmir, Turkey)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 3: Genicular Nerve Block. Michele CURATOLO (Endowed Professor for Medical Education and Research) (Demonstrator, Seattle, USA)
10:30 - 12:30 Workstation 4: iPACK. Maksym BARSA (Anaesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Rivne, Ukraine)
245
11:10

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D13
11:10 - 11:40

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Anatomy

Chairperson: Aleksejs MISCUKS (Professor) (Chairperson, Riga, Latvia, Latvia)
11:10 - 11:15 Introduction. Aleksejs MISCUKS (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Riga, Latvia, Latvia)
11:15 - 11:35 #43284 - D13 Anatomical basic knowledge for the occasional RA anesthesiologist.
Anatomical basic knowledge for the occasional RA anesthesiologist.

Anatomical basic knowledge for the occasional RA anesthesiologist

 

Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have become increasingly important in modern anesthetic practice. For anesthesiologists who perform RA procedures infrequently, maintaining a working knowledge of relevant anatomy is crucial for effective and safe practice. This summary aims to provide an overview of essential anatomical concepts and structures important in common RA procedures.

 

1.     The Neck

The Origin of the Brachial Plexus: The Roots and Trunci

The brachial plexus provides motor and sensory innervation of the upper limb. It commonly originates from the ventral rami of the spinal nerves C5 to C8 and the first thoracic spinal nerve, T1. In some cases, there may be contributions from C4 (prefixed plexus) or T2 (postfixed plexus). These anterior rami are more commonly known as “roots”, which is the common term used in the literature describing ultrasound guided regional anesthesia. These nerve roots emerge from the intervertebral foramina and pass between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. From the roots the three trunks of the brachial plexus are formed in the posterior triangle of the neck: C5 and C6 unite to form the upper trunk, C7 continues as the middle trunk whereas C8 and T1 join to form the lower trunk. In order to perform awake shoulder surgery, the C5 and C6 roots need to be blocked.

2.     Periclavicular area

Brachial plexus: Divisions and Cords

Each of the three trunks (upper, middle, and lower) splits into anterior and posterior divisions. This division occurs behind the clavicle. Anterior division primarily innervates the flexor compartments and posterior division mainly supplies the extensor compartments of the upper limb. The divisions then regroup to form three cords, named according to their relationship to the axillary artery. The cords are formed at the lateral border of the first rib and extend into the axilla. The lateral cord is formed by the anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks (C5-C7) and gives rise to the musculocutaneous nerve and lateral root of the median nerve, the medial cord, which is a continuation of the anterior division of the lower trunk (C8-T1) and contributes to the ulnar nerve, medial root of the median nerve, and medial cutaneous nerves of the arm and forearm and finally the posterior cord which is formed by the posterior division (C5-T1) and forms the axillary and radial nerves.

 

3.     The Arm

Major branches of the brachial plexus

In the axilla, the major branches of the brachial plexus are arranged around the axillary artery. The musculocutaneous nerve typically pierces the coracobrachialis muscle and runs between the biceps and brachialis. The median nerve lies anterior to the axillary artery. The ulnar nerve is positioned medial to the axillary artery and the radial nerve, the largest branch, is found posterior to the axillary artery, and courses into the posterior compartment of the arm through the triangular interval. The axillary nervewraps around the surgical neck of the humerus with the posterior circumflex humeral vessel.  Musculocutaneous nerve innervates biceps brachii, brachialis, and coracobrachialis and provides sensory innervation to the lateral forearm. The median nerve provides motor supply to the most anterior forearm flexors and thenar muscles and sensory innervation to the lateral palm, thumb, index, middle, and lateral half of ring finger. The ulnar nerve innervates hypothenar muscles, interossei, and some intrinsic hand muscle and provides sensory supply to the medial palm, little finger, and medial half of ring finger. The radial nerve provides motor supply to the posterior arm and forearm extensors and sensory innervation to the posterior arm and forearm, as well as areas of hand dorsolaterally. However, recent research has shown that the sensory innervation of the hand seems to be very variable, thereby complicating the testing of a success of a regional anesthetic block. Finally, the axillary nerve innervates the deltoid and teres minor muscles and provides sensory supply to the lateral shoulder area.

 

4.     Thoracic wall

The pectoralis major muscle forms the most superficial layer, originating from the clavicle, sternum, and upper ribs, and inserting onto the humerus. Deep to this lies the pectoralis minor, originating from ribs 3-5 and inserting on the coracoid process. The serratus anterior muscle originates from the lateral aspects of the upper 8-9 ribs and inserts on the medial border of the scapula. It lies on the lateral chest wall, deep to the pectoralis muscles.

The lateral pectoral nerve (C5-C7) innervates pectoralis major, medial pectoral nerve (C8-T1) pectoralis minor and partially pectoralis major muscles, whereas the long thoracic nerve (C5-C7) provides motor supply to the serratus anterior muscle. Note that these nerves originate from the brachial plexus.  Intercostal nerves, the ventral rami of thoracic spinal nerves T1-T11, run in the intercostal spaces between ribs and provide sensory innervation to the chest wall.

The axillary vessels and their branches are important landmarks in the ultrasound guided thoracic wall blocks. The thoracoacromial artery emerges from the axillary artery, pierces the clavipectoral fascia, and divides into four branches (acromial, clavicular, deltoid, and pectoral). The pectoral branch is particularly relevant to the PECS I Block, running between pectoralis major and minor. The lateral thoracic artery descends along the lateral border of pectoralis minor, supplying it and the lateral chest wall and is an important landmark for PECS II block. The long thoracic artery, being a key reference for the serratus anterior block, runs along the lateral chest wall, parallel to the long thoracic nerve and supplies the serratus anterior muscle. Internal thoracic artery is a notable mention, while not directly in the block area, its perforating branches contribute to breast and anterior chest wall blood supply.

 

5.     Abdominal wall

The abdominal wall consists of several muscles, the most superficial is the external oblique muscle, followed by the internal oblique and finally the deepest muscle, the transversus abdominis. Rectus abdominis muscles are paired vertical muscles, separated by the linea alba. Key nerves in this area include the thoracoabdominal nerves (T7-T12), that run between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles as well as the Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves (L1) that course through the transversus abdominis plane in the lower abdomen. The key vessels in this area are the superior and inferior epigastric vessels, which run deep to the rectus abdominis muscle and the deep circumflex iliac vessel, that courses along the inner aspect of the iliac crest. Two fascial planes hold a significance for the occasional regional anesthetist: transversus abdominis plane (TAP) between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles and the rectus sheath which surrounds the rectus abdominis muscle.

 

6.     Inguinal crease and the thigh

In lieu of the modern surgery and its push to an early ambulation, the femoral block itself has lost some of its appeal, however anatomy around the inguinal continues to play an important role in the armamentarium of an occasional regional anesthetist.

The Inguinal ligament which runs from the anterior superior iliac spine to the pubic tubercle, represents an important landmark in the performance of the suprainguinal fascia iliaca block as well as the PENG block. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve passes under or through the inguinal ligament lateral to the anterior superior iliac spine. Two fasciae of the utmost importance in terms of the blocks performed in this area: the fascia lata and the deeper fascia iliaca, which envelops the iliacus and psoas muscles. Femoral nerve lies deep to the fascia iliaca, lateral to the femoral artery, medial to the artery lies the femoral vein.

An important structure in the transition from the inguinal crease to the thigh is the femoral triangle, bounded by the inguinal ligament superiorly, sartorius laterally, and adductor longus medially. The floor of the femoral triangle is formed by the iliopsoas muscle and the roof by the fascia iliaca. Key structures at the tip of the femoral triangle are the femoral artery, a central, hyperechoic structures on ultrasound, medial to it, usually compressible with the ultrasound probe, lies the femoral vein.

 

7.     Popliteal fossa and the foot

The popliteal fossa is a diamond-shaped space behind the knee, bounded superolaterally by the biceps femoris muscle, superomedially by the semimembranosus and semitendinosus muscles, inferolaterally by the lateral head of gastrocnemius muscle and inferomedially by the medial head of gastrocnemius muscle. Within the popliteal fossa, the sciatic nerve typically bifurcates into tibial and common peroneal nerves, though the level of division can vary considerably, anywhere from the lower thigh to the popliteal fossa. The tibial nerve is larger and lies more superficially and is a continuation of the sciatic nerve's medial component. Common peroneal nerve is smaller and is located lateral to the tibial nerve. The popliteal vein typically lies between the sciatic nerve and the popliteal artery, which is the deepest ultrasound landmark structure, lying closest to the femur bone.

The tibial nerve provides motor innervation to the muscles in the posterior compartment of the leg as well as most of the intrinsic muscles of the foot. Sensory supply of the tibial nerve stretches over the posterior aspect of the leg, sole and lateral aspect of the foot, as well as the toes, with the exception of the webspace between the 1st and 2nd toes, which is innervated by the deep peroneal nerve. This is also the only area on the lower limb where the success of the sensory block of the deep peroneal nerve can be tested, as this nerve is a predominantly motor nerve, innervating the anterior compartment and dorsiflexors of the foot and has a limited sensory distribution.

The superficial peroneal nerve provides motor innervation to the peroneal muscles (evertors) and extensive sensory innervation to the dorsum of the foot, with the exception of the lateral side of the fifth toe, typically innervated by the sural nerve, which is formed from the tibial and the common peroneal nerve and is a purely sensory nerve.

An important exception to the predominantly sciatic sensory supply to the lower leg are the medial aspect of the leg from knee to ankle and in up to 10% of the population the medial aspect of the foot to the base of the big toe, which are innervated by the saphenous nerve, the terminal branch of the femoral nerve.

 

A solid foundation in relevant anatomy is essential for the safe and effective practice of regional anesthesia, even for occasional practitioners. By focusing on key anatomical concepts and structures, anesthesiologists can enhance their ability to perform successful nerve blocks, interpret imaging findings, and manage potential complications. Ongoing anatomical education and review should be an integral part of maintaining competence in regional anesthesia techniques.

 


Barbara RUPNIK (Zurich, Switzerland)
11:35 - 11:40 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E13
11:10 - 11:40

TIPS & TRICKS
Monitoring

Chairperson: Fani ALEVROGIANNI (Resident) (Chairperson, Athens, Greece)
11:10 - 11:15 Introduction. Fani ALEVROGIANNI (Resident) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
11:15 - 11:35 Continuous monitoring during block performance and assessing PNB effectiveness. Xavier CAPDEVILA (MD, PhD, Professor, Head of department) (Keynote Speaker, Montpellier, France)
11:35 - 11:40 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F13
11:10 - 11:40

TIPS & TRICKS
Hip Fracture

Chairperson: Nat HASLAM (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Sunderland, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 11:15 Introduction. Nat HASLAM (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Sunderland, United Kingdom)
11:15 - 11:35 Hip fractures. Does RA play a role in postoperative pain and outcome? Luis Fernando VALDES VILCHES (Clinical head) (Keynote Speaker, Marbella, Spain)
11:35 - 11:40 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G13
11:10 - 11:40

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Platelet Rich Plasma

Chairperson: Teodor GOROSZENIUK (Consultant) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 11:15 Introduction. Teodor GOROSZENIUK (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
11:15 - 11:35 Scientific Principles, Clinical Applications & Current Evidence. Nicole PORZ (Leitende Ärztin) (Keynote Speaker, Bern, Switzerland)
11:35 - 11:40 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H13
11:10 - 12:20

PANEL DISCUSSION
Training RA for obstetric anesthesia

Chairperson: Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Chairperson, Leuven, Belgium)
11:10 - 11:15 Introduction. Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
11:15 - 11:35 Training models for obstetric anesthesia. Vishal UPPAL (Associate Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Halifax, Canada, Canada)
11:35 - 11:55 Microanatomy of the blood-nerve barrier in human dural sac, nerve root cuffs, and peripheral nerves. Miguel Angel REINA (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Madrid, Spain)
11:55 - 12:15 Is AI helpful for obstetric anesthesia? James BOWNESS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
12:15 - 12:20 Q&A.
NORTH HALL
11:30

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B12
11:30 - 12:20

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
POCUS on abdomen

Chairperson: Ezzat SAMY AZIZ (Professor of Anesthesia) (Chairperson, Cairo, Egypt)
11:30 - 11:35 Introduction. Ezzat SAMY AZIZ (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Cairo, Egypt)
11:35 - 11:50 Gastric ultrasound for patient care I. Rosie HOGG (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Belfast, United Kingdom)
11:50 - 12:05 Gastric ultrasound for patient care II. Peter VAN DE PUTTE (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Bonheiden, Belgium)
12:05 - 12:20 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C13
11:30 - 12:20

LIVE DEMONSTRATION
Blocks below the clavicle

Demonstrators: Agnese OZOLINA (faculty member) (Demonstrator, Riga, Latvia), Peter POREDOS (head of department, consultant) (Demonstrator, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Slovenia)
South Hall 1A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
O15
11:30 - 14:30

OFF SITE - Hands - On Cadaver Workshop 2 - RA
UPPER & LOWER LIMB BLOCKS, TRUNK BLOCKS

Demonstrator: Peter MERJAVY (Consultant Anaesthetist & Acute Pain Lead) (Demonstrator, Craigavon, United Kingdom)
Unique and exclusive for RA & Pain Cadaveric Workshops: Only whole-body cadavers will be available for the workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity to master your needling skills, perform the actual blocks on fresh cadavers and to improve your ergonomics under direct supervision of world experts in regional anaesthesia and chronic pain management. There won’t be an organized transportation for going/back from the Cadaver workshop.
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 1. Upper Limb Blocks. Attila BONDAR (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Cork, Ireland)
ISB, SCB, AxB, cervical plexus (Supine Position)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 2. Upper Limb and chest Blocks. Peter KENDERESSY (Senior Consultant and Lecturer in Paediatric Anaesthesia) (Demonstrator, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
ICB, IPPB/PSPB (PECS), , SAPB (Supine Position)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 3. Thoracic trunk blocks. Alexandros MAKRIS (Anaesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Athens, Greece)
Th PVB, ESP, ITP (Prone Position)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 4. Abdominal trunk Blocks. Graeme MCLEOD (Professor) (Demonstrator, Dundee, United Kingdom)
TAP, RSB, IH/II (Supine Position)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 5. Lower limb blocks. Melody HERMAN (Director of Regional Anesthesiology) (Demonstrator, Charlotte, USA)
SiFiB, PENG, FEMB, FTB, Aductor Canal B, Obturator (Supine Position)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 6. Lower limb blocks. Geert-Jan VAN GEFFEN (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, NIjmegen, The Netherlands)
QLBs, proximal and distal sciatic B, iPACK (Lateral Position)
Anatomy Institute

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
FP11
11:30 - 12:25

OBSTETRIC
Free Papers 2

Chairperson: Thomas WIESMANN (Head of the Dept.) (Chairperson, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)
11:30 - 11:37 #42439 - OP026 Comparison of the Efficacy of Postcesarean Analgesia by Combination of Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anaesthetics with Infiltration Through the Wound Site Versus Intratechal Morphine: Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study.
OP026 Comparison of the Efficacy of Postcesarean Analgesia by Combination of Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anaesthetics with Infiltration Through the Wound Site Versus Intratechal Morphine: Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study.

Aim is to evaluate the efficacy of anaesthetic instillation on peritoneum in combination with infiltration through all of the anterior abdominal structures in comparison to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia.

46 women scheduled for elective cesarean-section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. Spinal anaesthesia in Group II was performed using isobaric 0,5% bupivacaine + 15µg fentanyl considering the height and weight, while in Group I 150µg morphine was also added. At the end of the surgery in Group II, a solution of 15 ml 0,5% bupivacaine + 15 ml 2% lidocaine+1:200.000 epinephrine was instilled on four quadrants of uterus, infiltrated on borders of the rectus aponeurosis and through the wound site. In group I, same volumes of saline were administered instead. Primary outcome was the total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain scores at rest and during movement at; 2,4,6,12,24. hours, incidence of adverse effects and the time for first opioid request. (NCT05405049)

Demographic data except for height (p=0.23) and total opioid consumption (p=0.075) were similar amongst groups. Time for first opioid request was significantly longer in Group I. (p=0.034). No statistically significant difference was found between groups considering active and passive pain scores and adverse effects except for pruritus(p=0.032) .

Combining intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation and infiltration through anterior abdominal structures provides post-cesarean analgesia as effectively as intratechal morphine. This combination is non-inferior and can be an alternative to intratechal morphine in cases where it is not possible.
Ramazan İNCE, Mehmet Akif YILMAZ, Miraç Selcen ÖZKAL YALIN (ERZURUM, Turkey), Ayşenur DOSTBİL, Kamber KAŞALİ, Gamze Nur CİMİLLİ ŞENOCAK, Mehmet AKSOY, Selvihan TAPANOĞLU KARACA
11:37 - 11:44 #41424 - OP027 The roles of maternal psychological and pain vulnerabilities in sub-acute pain after childbirth.
OP027 The roles of maternal psychological and pain vulnerabilities in sub-acute pain after childbirth.

Sub-acute pain after childbirth (SAPC) can escalate to chronic pain, impairing maternal well-being. Central sensitisation, a major pain vulnerability, plays a pivotal role in worsening and prolonged pain. We aimed to investigate whether central sensitisation was associated with increased SAPC risk. We also investigated the roles of psychological and pain vulnerabilities, obstetric factors, and analgesic choice in SAPC development.

Our prospective cohort study at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, included pregnant women aged 21 and above with term pregnancies and American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status II. Psychological and pain vulnerabilities, obstetric factors, and analgesic choice were assessed using established self-reporting scales. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Clinically relevant variables with p-value < 0.10 in univariate logistic regression analyses were selected using a stepwise variable selection to construct the final multivariable model.

We recruited 816 postpartum patients between 2017 and 2021, 99 (12.1%) developed SAPC at 6 to 10 weeks postpartum. The multivariable model revealed higher Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) score, increased number of pain relief administered, having had artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocic induction, increased blood loss during delivery, having had third degree tear and higher infant’s weight were independently associated with higher SAPC incidence. Having had prostin induction was associated with reduced SAPC risk. The area under the curve of the model is 0.727 (95%CI 0.674-0.780).

This study explores SAPC development in psychological and pain vulnerabilities, obstetric factors, and analgesic choice. Further investigations should delve into the underlying mechanisms to develop tailored interventions.
Yaochen LIU (Singapore, Singapore), Rehena SULTANA, Chin Wen TAN, Ban Leong SNG
11:44 - 11:51 #42436 - OP029 Comparing The Effect Of Three Different Post-Cesarean Analgesic Techniques On Obstetric Quality Of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) Score After Elective Cesarean Section Operations: Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded Pilot Study.
OP029 Comparing The Effect Of Three Different Post-Cesarean Analgesic Techniques On Obstetric Quality Of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) Score After Elective Cesarean Section Operations: Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded Pilot Study.

It is aimed to compare the effect of three different analgesic techniques used for pain control after elective cesarean section operations on quality of recovery as stated by the patient, using the ObsQoR-10 scoring system.

30 women scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. Spinal anaesthesia was maintained with 11.2 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine+15 µg fentanyl in Groups II-III, while morphine was also added in Group I. In Group II, bilateral ultrasound-guided QLB-I was performed and in Group III the same volume and concentration of anaesthetic was instilled on uterus, infiltrated on rectus aponeurosis and through the wound site. The patients filled out ObsQoR-10 and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L at 24 hours postoperatively.

Validity was evaluated by hypothesis test and structural validity. There was no difference considering ObsQoR-10 scores at 24 hours postoperatively between the groups. Scores were in correlation with age, ambulation time, passive and active pain scores at 24 hours. ObsQoR-10 values were found to be lower in those treated with ondansetrone and who had nausea and vomiting. (p<0.05). There was a moderate correlation of ObsQoR-10 score with EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (r=- 0.690). The ObsQoR-10 is found to be consistent internally and has excellent test-retest reliability. The highest ranked items were, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, and lowest was pain. (NCT06341049)

In this study, it was found that groups had no difference in terms of ObsQoR-10 scores and that this scoring sytem is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pain recovery.
Mehmet Akif YILMAZ, Miraç Selcen ÖZKAL YALIN (ERZURUM, Turkey), Ayşenur DOSTBİL, Kamber KAŞALİ, Gamze Nur CİMİLLİ ŞENOCAK, Didem ONK, Muhammed CEREN, İlker İNCE
11:51 - 11:58 #42444 - OP030 Landmark accuracy for spinal anaesthesia in obese obstetric patients: should we use lumbar ultrasound routinely ?
OP030 Landmark accuracy for spinal anaesthesia in obese obstetric patients: should we use lumbar ultrasound routinely ?

Obesity complicates landmark-based spinal anaesthesia, increasing misidentification of intervertebral levels and needle insertions. While various meta-analyses have compared ultrasound to landmark techniques, obstetric studies remain scarce. In this study, we aimed to determine if obesity impacts injection site accuracy in landmark-based spinal anaesthesia among Obstetric patients.

Ethical approval was obtained for this observational prospective cohort study(HRA,England 16/NE/0410). Two cohorts were defined as lower BMI >/=35 kgm-2 or higher BMI <35 Kgm-2, based on our local population's median booking BMI(35 kgm-2). Intervertebral space was determined by the anaesthetist using landmark-based approach which assumes the line intersecting top of iliac crests at the level of L4 vertebra and distal end of spinal cord at L1 vertebra. Using ultrasound(U/S), the research team determined whether there was a difference between the landmark and the U/S-derived spinal level and then quantified the difference in levels. We also recorded difficulty in identifying the landmarks.

111 women were included. Palpating landmarks was significantly easier in the lower BMI group (n=55) than higher BMI group(n=56), (p < 0.0001). Spinal level was correctly determined only approximately 50% of the time in both the lower and the higher BMI group (50.9% v 44.6%, p=0.7); however, with the higher BMI group, 100% inaccuracies resulted from aiming too high, compared to 69.8% in lower BMI group(p=0.001).

Obesity increases the risk of aiming higher than intended intervertebral space for spinal anaesthesia in obstetric patients using traditional landmark-based approach, which highlights the need for routinely incorporating pre-procedural ultrasound, especially in this group of patients.
Nishant KALRA, Nishant KALRA (Cambridge, United Kingdom), Fleur ROBERTS, Mark PRINCE, Timothy ORR, Ian WRENCH, Phil BONNET, Alison COLHOUN
11:58 - 12:05 #40276 - OP031 Accidental dura puncture during labor epidural analgesia and intrathecal catheter: A perfect camaraderie.
OP031 Accidental dura puncture during labor epidural analgesia and intrathecal catheter: A perfect camaraderie.

Childbirth is a unique and exciting time for pregnant woman. Epidural analgesia during labor is gold standard technique for pain relief. Accidental dural puncture (ADP) during labor epidural is not uncommon and is distress moment for both patient and anaesthesiologist. Resiting epidural catheter (REC) at same or another space, or placing catheter into intrathecal (IT) space are two available options.

We searched the review of literature, meta-analysis and retrospective studies of last ten years, related to ADP, intrathecal catheter (ITC), postdural puncture headache (PDPH), epidural blood patch (EBP) in parturients requesting labor analgesia.

The incidence of ADP is 0.2-3.6% and PDPH develops in 66% of patients. ITC reduces the incidence of PDPH to<30% and decreases the need of EBP by>50%, if the catheter is in place for >24 hours. ITC gives advantage of avoiding repeat ADP or failure to place a neuraxial catheter at all. REC carries 10% risk of second ADP. ITC allows immediate pain relief in labor patient with severe pain, difficulty in position, and non-reassuring fetal tracing. Parturients having morbid obesity, history of spine surgery, scoliosis and multiple attempts at epidural placement are candidates of ITC. ITC placed for labor analgesia can be extended for caesarean delivery (CD) using incremental dosing. There are no serious complications reported.

The ITC potentially decreases incidence of PDPH and need for EBP. Further, ITC guarantees a rapid onset, high quality and predictable labour analgesia or even surgical anaesthesia, if CD is required. Catheter identification and communication with labor staff avoid errors.
Sameer KAPOOR (DUBAI, United Arab Emirates), Ghassan KLOUB, Shrutika PAREKH
12:05 - 12:12 #42743 - OP032 Evaluating the Effect of Labor Analgesia on Recovery of Parturients After Vaginal Delivery Using the Obstetric Quality Of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) Scores: Prospective Single Center Observational Study.
OP032 Evaluating the Effect of Labor Analgesia on Recovery of Parturients After Vaginal Delivery Using the Obstetric Quality Of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) Scores: Prospective Single Center Observational Study.

It is aimed to evaluate and compare the recovery of parturients giving birth with and without labor analgesia using the ObsQoR-10 score.

The women admitted for vaginal birth were allocated into two groups. 20 women who requested labor analgesia were included in Group I while 20 others who didn’t want to have labor analgesia formed Group II. They were asked to fill out ObsQoR-10 and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L at hours 24,48 an 72 postoperatively. Primary outcome was ObsQoR-10 scores at 24. hours postpartum. Secondary outcomes were was ObsQoR-10 scores at 48. and 72. hours postpartum as well as pyschiametric evaluation of ObsQoR-10. (NCT06325475)

Data were analysed using validity hypothesis test and structural validity test. In hypothesis test, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of ObsQoR-10 scores. The ObsQoR-10 scores at 48. And 72. hours postpartum were also similar. There was a correlation between ObsQoR-10 scores at 24. hour and postpatum haemoglobin levels. At 48 and 72 hours, ObsQoR-10 scores were correlated with age. In structural validity, a correlation between ObsQoR-10 scores at 24, 48, 72 hours and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores. The ObsQoR-10 is found to have good internal consistency. The highest ranked Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 items were, nausea or vomiting, dizziness and shivering. The lowest ranked item was pain.

Although epidural analgesia is an invasive procedure, study shows that there is no significant difference between groups in terms of postpartum ObsQoR-10 scores, and that this scoring is a valid and reliable evaluation tool.
Gamze Nur CİMİLLİ ŞENOCAK, Emirhan AKARSU, Ayşenur DOSTBİL, Alp Ertunga DULGEROGLU, Mehmet Akif YILMAZ, Recep KURTBAŞ, Miraç Selcen ÖZKAL YALIN (ERZURUM, Turkey)
12:12 - 12:19 #40185 - OP028 The effect of remimazolam compared to propofol on postoperative shivering in patient undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia with sedation.
OP028 The effect of remimazolam compared to propofol on postoperative shivering in patient undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia with sedation.

Shivering is known to be a frequent complication in patients undergoing surgery under neuraxial anesthesia with incidence of 40–70% Although many pharmacological agents have been used to treat or prevent postspinal anesthesia shivering (PSAS), the ideal treatment wasn’t found.[1] This study compared the effects of remimazolam with propofol on postoperative shivering(PS) in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Seventy patients were allocated into one of two groups. After delivery, group A received propofol and group B received remimazolam for sedation.

The incidence and severity of postoperative shivering, core body temperature, and the association of PS with hypothermia, MAP, or HR in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were measured. Group B had significantly lower rates of perioperative hypothermia (50.1 vs. 28.0%, p = 0.04) and postoperative shivering (40.2 vs. 20.1%, p = 0.042). The severity of PS was also lower in group B than in group A (p = 0.032). Core body temperature was significantly higher in group B than in group A from 10 min after induction (p = 0.046) to the PACU (p = 0.02). MAP and HR were more stable in group B than in group A. In group A, the correlation between the severity of PS and the incidence of hypothermia was moderate but not significant. In group B, the correlation between PS severity and hypothermia was moderate and significant.

Remimazolam showed better results than propofol in anesthesia maintenance regarding hypothermia.
Seunghee CHO (Incheon, Republic of Korea)
CHAMBER HALL
11:50

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E14
11:50 - 12:20

TIPS & TRICKS
Pediatric RA

Chairperson: Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Chairperson, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
11:50 - 11:55 Introduction. Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Keynote Speaker, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
11:55 - 12:15 #43472 - E14 Adjusting RA to Kids.
Adjusting RA to Kids.

 

Regional anaesthetic techniques for paediatric patients undergoing operative procedures have become increasingly popular throughout the world over the past few decades due to their significant benefits. Important among these are prolonged pain control and the ability to avoid opioid analgesia that promote post- operative nausea and vomiting. 

An overview of the unique features of paediatric anatomy and physiology that allow successful performance of these techniques is presented. Combinations of local anaesthetics and adjuvant medications that prolong caudal and peripheral nerve blocks are reviewed, the use of peripheral nerve blocks and specific recommendations for the use of these blocks in children is also presented. 

The use of regional anaesthesia is considered very safe and offer the ability to target therapy directly to the site of surgery. 

With advances in the understanding of pain in children, progress in studying new techniques of regional anaesthesia, update equipment and the use of safe local anaesthetic agents, the use of regional anaesthetic blocks will continue to evolve. 

Regional anaesthesia remains an important component of the multimodal approach specifically benefitting pediatric patients over opioid-based analgesia. Major goals of regional anaesthesia for paediatric surgery include effective and prolonged pain control and avoidance of unpleasant side-effects that distress patients and their families or that prolong hospital stay. 


Lara RIBEIRO (Braga-Portugal, Portugal)
12:15 - 12:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F14
11:50 - 12:20

TIPS & TRICKS
Ambulatory Surgery

Chairperson: Xavier CAPDEVILA (MD, PhD, Professor, Head of department) (Chairperson, Montpellier, France)
11:50 - 11:55 Introduction. Xavier CAPDEVILA (MD, PhD, Professor, Head of department) (Keynote Speaker, Montpellier, France)
11:55 - 12:15 Optimal Pain Management for Ambulatory Surgery. Patrick NARCHI (Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, SOYAUX, France)
12:15 - 12:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G14
11:50 - 12:20

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Emerging techniques for acute pain

Chairperson: Vicente ROQUES (Anesthesiologist consultant) (Chairperson, Murcia. Spain, Spain)
11:50 - 11:55 Introduction. Vicente ROQUES (Anesthesiologist consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Murcia. Spain, Spain)
11:55 - 12:15 Cryoneurolysis for acute pain. Nadia HERNANDEZ (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Houston, Texas, USA)
12:15 - 12:20 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D14
11:50 - 12:20

REFRESHING YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Obstetric

Chairperson: Kassiani THEODORAKI (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Athens, Greece)
11:50 - 11:55 Introduction. Kassiani THEODORAKI (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
11:55 - 12:15 Optimising outcomes in preeclampsia – what is the role of neuraxial techniques. Sarah DEVROE (Head of clinic) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
12:15 - 12:20 Q&A.
South Hall 1B
12:30 LUNCH BREAK
14:00

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B14
14:00 - 14:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Blocks in challenging situations

Chairperson: Ana Eugenia HERRERA (Regional Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, San José, Costa Rica)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Ana Eugenia HERRERA (Regional Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, San José, Costa Rica)
14:05 - 14:35 Blocks in challenging situations. Lukas KIRCHMAIR (Chair) (Keynote Speaker, Schwaz, Austria)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C15
14:00 - 14:50

LIVE DEMONSTRATION
Thoracic wall blocks

Demonstrators: Peter POREDOS (head of department, consultant) (Demonstrator, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Slovenia), Valentina RANCATI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Lausanne, Switzerland)
South Hall 1A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D16
14:00 - 14:50

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Procedure specific vs. individualized pain management

Chairperson: Eleni MOKA (faculty) (Chairperson, Heraklion, Crete, Greece)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Eleni MOKA (faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Heraklion, Crete, Greece)
14:05 - 14:20 Procedure-specific pain management. Axel SAUTER (consultant anaesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Oslo, Norway)
14:20 - 14:35 Individualized pain management. Esther POGATZKI ZAHN (Full Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Muenster, Germany)
14:35 - 14:50 Conclusion and Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E16
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
RA is a MUST for every ERAS Protocol

Chairperson: Kariem EL BOGHDADLY (Consultant) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Kariem EL BOGHDADLY (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
14:05 - 14:20 For the PROs. Ana LOPEZ (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Genk, Belgium)
14:20 - 14:35 For the CONs. Luis Fernando VALDES VILCHES (Clinical head) (Keynote Speaker, Marbella, Spain)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F16
14:00 - 14:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Blocks for shoulder surgery

Chairperson: Edward MARIANO (Speaker) (Chairperson, Palo Alto, USA)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Edward MARIANO (Speaker) (Keynote Speaker, Palo Alto, USA)
14:05 - 14:35 Blocks for shoulder surgery. Sebastien BLOC (Anesthésiste Réanimateur) (Keynote Speaker, Paris, France)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G16
14:00 - 14:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Conversion

Chairperson: Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Chairperson, Leuven, Belgium)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
14:05 - 14:35 Conversion of labour epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for C-section. Tatiana SIDIROPOULOU (Professor and Chair) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H16
14:00 - 16:00

SIMULATION TRAININGS

Demonstrators: Josip AZMAN (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Linkoping, Sweden), Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Demonstrator, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Kassiani THEODORAKI (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Athens, Greece), Roman ZUERCHER (Senior Consultant) (Demonstrator, Basel, Switzerland)
NORTH HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
FP14
14:00 - 14:55

PAEDIATRIC
Free Papers 3

Chairperson: Luc TIELENS (pediatric anesthesiology staff member) (Chairperson, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
14:00 - 14:07 #42471 - OP033 Assessment of analgesic efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing enucleation for retinoblastoma: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
OP033 Assessment of analgesic efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing enucleation for retinoblastoma: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Enucleation surgery for retinoblastoma is painful. This study compared analgesic efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia (GA) in children. Primary outcome was number of children having moderate to severe pain in 6hours post-surgery. Pain scores (2,6,12 & 24 hrs), perioperative fentanyl (intraoperative and 2 hours postoperative) requirement, time to first postoperative analgesic (TFPA), incidence of OCR and PONV were also assessed.

Fifty-four children, aged 0 -10 years were randomised to the peribulbar(PB) or GA group. Post induction of anaesthesia, PB group children were administered peribulbar block using 0.3ml/kg,0.5% ropivacaine. Intraoperative increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure 20% above baseline was treated with 0.5mcg/kg fentanyl boluses.

Number of children with moderate to severe pain was lesser in the PB group [9/29(31%) ] versus the GA group [13/25(52%)] in 6 postoperative hours. TFPA was shorter in GA group, but the difference was not significant, (Table 1). Number of patients requiring intraoperative fentanyl and total perioperative fentanyl requirement was significantly lower in study group (Table 1). Significant tachycardia was observed on traction of eyeball during enucleation (p<0.05) in the GA versus PB group (Figure 1). Pain scores at different time points, incidence of OCR and PONV were comparable between groups, (Table 1).

The higher perioperative fentanyl administration in the GA group may have led to comparable pain scores between the two groups. The post-hoc analysis revealed the power of the study to be 78%, suggesting that further larger studies need to be carried out in the future.
Shraddha DEWANGAN (Delhi, India), Anjolie CHHABRA
14:07 - 14:14 #41453 - OP035 Intrathecal Morphine as a Strategy to Eliminate IVPCA for the Management of Post-Surgical Pain In Scoliosis Patients.
OP035 Intrathecal Morphine as a Strategy to Eliminate IVPCA for the Management of Post-Surgical Pain In Scoliosis Patients.

Surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires high doses of opioids, traditionally via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA). An ERAS protocol was implemented at our institution to stop routine use of IVPCA, to be replaced with either intrathecal morphine injection or enteral methadone, and transition to enteral analgesia by morning after surgery.

With REB approval, chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS before and after protocol implementation, to compare outcomes and feasibility of managing pain with the ERAS protocol.

62 patients were included, 32 receiving IVPCA and 30 in the ERAS pathway. No significant difference between groups by age, gender or BMI. Majority of patients in the ERAS pathway did not require rescue doses of opioids in the recovery room (53.3%), POD 0 (76.7%) or POD 1 (73.3%). There were statistically significant differences in pain scores between the two groups, with the IVPCA group having higher pain scores at 0 hours (p=0.002), ERAS group having higher pain scores at 24 hours (p=0.02) and 36 hours (0.01), with no difference in pain scores between groups at 12 hours (p=0.12). Length of stay in ERAS pathway (mean 3.16 days) versus IVPCA (2.83 days) pathway were not statistically significantly different (p=0.07).

Analgesia after AIS repair can be successfully achieved without IVPCA, with intrathecal morphine or methadone, to allow for increased mobility, reduced use of resources and decreased reliance on intravenous medications. More judicious use of enteral rescue doses should be incorporated to further improve pain management.
Deepa KATTAIL (Toronto, Canada), David LEBEL, Elen MULLAJ, Eric GREENWOOD, Mark MCVEY, Mark CAMP
14:14 - 14:21 #42650 - OP036 Effectiveness of Perfusion Index for Predicting Onset of Paediatric Caudal Block under Sevoflurane Anesthesia.
OP036 Effectiveness of Perfusion Index for Predicting Onset of Paediatric Caudal Block under Sevoflurane Anesthesia.

Caudal block is the most popular regional anesthesia technique in paediatric day case perineal & lower limb surgery. But assessing the onset of caudal block challenging since paediatric surgeries are performed under general anesthesia(GA). Perfusion index (PI), which reflects the ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile blood flow at monitoring site, PI is increased in adequate caudal block. This study aims to assess the role of PI alongside mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and Cremasteric reflex (CR) in promptly detecting paediatric caudal block onset under GA.

120 consecutive patients scheduled to surgery taken in this observational study and 10 patients (8.3%) were excluded due to failed reading, leaving data from 110 patients for analysis. Baseline PI, HR, MAP, CR were recorded prior to and post caudal block at 5,10,15,20 min. Onset of adequate block was defined as 100% increase of PI from baseline, 15% decrease of MAP or HR from baseline, loss of CR.

Results show that PI most promptly confirms the onset of caudal block, followed by loss of CR, HR and MBP reductions confirm it later. At 10 minutes, many patients show a ≥100% increase in PI. AUC (Area Under Curve) values moderate discriminatory ability for PI increase (0.364) and absent CR time (0.329) compared to HR and MBP. PI and CR slightly outperform then HR and MBP in predicting successful caudal block.

PI proves to be a reliable and continuous indicator for promptly identifying the initial stages of caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing GA.
Sylvia KHAN (DHAKA, Bangladesh), Shyama Prosad MITRA, Lutful AZIZ, Hasina AKHTER, Salah Uddin Al AZAD, Md Aftab UDDIN, Anm BADRUDDOZA, Masrufa HOSSAIN
14:21 - 14:28 #42804 - OP037 The readability of patient information leaflets in paediatric post-operative pain.
OP037 The readability of patient information leaflets in paediatric post-operative pain.

The management of post-operative pain is essential to ensure patient comfort and timely recovery following surgery. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the recommended analgesics for post operative pain at our tertiary paediatric hospital. Paediatric patients rely on their guardians for the correct administration of their pain relief. Unfortunately, poor literacy skills may lead to guardians not understanding the patient information leaflets (PIL) provided with medications. The literature suggests that health information should be pitched at a reading age level of 11-13 years of age.

The "Health Products Regulatory Authority" database was searched for paracetamol and ibuprofen products that were suitable for children. The registered PIL from these products were entered into a readability tool. Five of the tests compared the readability to an American school grade while one of the tests (FRE) rated the readability on a numerical scale. The corresponding cut off for a reading age of 11-13 was a grade of ≤ 7 or >70 for the FRE score.

31 products met our criteria. 14(45%) were paracetamol and 17(55%) were ibuprofen products. The mean grade of all tests were >7 (range 10.95 - 13.56) and mean of FRE was <70 (mean 43.48).

Using standardised readability tests, all PIL were above the recommended reading age for medical information. This may affect a guardian's ability to provide appropriate pain relief for children following surgery. Pharmaceutical companies should ensure that PIL are at the recommended reading level to prevent incorrect dosing of pain relief which may lead to pain and patient harm.
Conor HAUGH (Dublin, Ireland), Ruth MOONEY, Rachael HORAN
14:28 - 14:35 #42522 - OP038 Use of dexmedetomidine for caudal anesthesia in pediatric patients.
OP038 Use of dexmedetomidine for caudal anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Caudal anesthesia is one of the most popular, reliable and safe methods of pain relief in children and can provide pain relief for various surgical procedures below the navel.

Research material and methods: The subject of the study was 946 children with physical status I and II class of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), aged 0 to 12 years, who underwent elective surgeries below the navel, such as hernia repair, orchiopexy, hypospadias repair, epispadias, etc. Depending on the drug administered, the patients were divided into two groups: Group A: bupivacaine 2.5 mg / kg + saline 1.2 ml / kg. Group B: bupivacaine 2.5 mg / kg + 1 μg / kg dexmedetomidine + saline 1.2 ml / kg.

Research results: The duration of caudal analgesia was determined from complained of pain or the time when the first postoperative analgesia was required. The average the moment the anesthetic was injected until the moment the child first duration of postoperative caudal analgesia in patients of group A was 4.21 ± 0.88, while in patients of group B this duration was 10.18 ± 0.85 hours.

Conclusions. Our results show that the addition of dexmedetomidine to the local anesthetic for caudal block significantly increases the duration of analgesia and reduces the need for analgesics.
Esmira NASIBOVA (Baku, Azerbaijan)
14:35 - 14:42 #42595 - OP039 In pediatric patients, regional anesthesia decreases opioid use, and hospital length of stay for inpatients.
OP039 In pediatric patients, regional anesthesia decreases opioid use, and hospital length of stay for inpatients.

Regional anesthesia is not as widely used for pediatric cases as for adults, and whether it significantly decreases intra- and postoperative opioid use or has an impact on short-term outcomes such as time in PACU, discharge and readmission is still unclear.

We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients (age ≤17) who underwent surgery with general anesthesia at our center between 2016 and 2021. Patients were broken down into a group that did not receive regional anesthesia and a group that did. Data collected included intra-operative opioids in morphine milligram equivalent per kg, PACU LOS, postoperative respiratory complications, postoperative hospital LOS, and 30-day readmission.

Out of 21,863 patients, after excluding ASA > 4, patients who were intubated or had a tracheotomy preoperatively, and records with missing data, 20,878 records were included. Analysis included adjusting for confounders. Opioid use (in morphine equivalent per kg) was significantly lower in the regional group (N=1,248) than in the no-regional group (N=19,630): 0.40 ± 1.01 vs. 0.58 ± 1.83; p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in PACU LOS, postoperative respiratory complications, 30-day readmission or postoperative hospital LOS. However, postoperative HLOS was significantly shorter in the regional group when excluding ambulatory patients: 4.8 ± 11.1 vs. 6.9 ± 18.6 days; p = 0.049; adjusted absolute difference 0.19 days or about 4.5 hours.

In our sample of pediatric patients, regional anesthesia significantly decreased opioid use. For inpatients, HLOS was also significantly reduced.
Arthur HERTLING (New York, USA), Aline GRIMM, Maira RUDOLPH, Matthias EIKERMANN, Felix BORNGAESSER, Ling ZHANG, Jerry CHAO
14:42 - 14:49 #42678 - OP034 Comparison of Caudal epidural block with Multiple injection Costotransverse block for renal surgeries in paediatric patients: A prospective randomised, clinical trial.
OP034 Comparison of Caudal epidural block with Multiple injection Costotransverse block for renal surgeries in paediatric patients: A prospective randomised, clinical trial.

Renal surgeries in pediatrics often result in significant post-operative pain, necessitating effective analgesia for early recovery and complication minimization. While caudal epidural block is commonly used, its short duration often requires adjuncts like morphine or clonidine, which can cause adverse effects. Recently, the Multiple Injection Costotransverse Block (MICB) has been introduced, showing promising perioperative analgesia. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of MICB to caudal block in pediatric renal surgeries by evaluating the total fentanyl requirement within 24 hours post-surgery

In this study, 56 children undergoing renal surgery were divided into two groups with 28 children in each group. Group CB/ caudal block received 0.2% Ropivacaine 1.25ml/kg and Group MICB/multiple injection costo transverse block received 0.2%Ropivacaine 2mg /kg under usg guidance

The MICB group showed significantly lower mean fentanyl consumption (0.57 ± 0.17 mcg/kg) compared to the caudal block (0.84 ± 0.31 mcg/kg) (p=0.03). Fewer patients in MICB group(32.14%) needed rescue analgesia within 24 hours compared to caudal block (53.57%). MICB also prolonged time to rescue analgesia (4 hrs vs. 2 hrs) and had higher parental satisfaction (p=0.01). No complications occurred

In children undergoing renal surgeries, MICB offers better, safer, and prolonged post-operative analgesia with higher parental satisfaction than caudal epidural block. It should be considered as an alternative, requiring ultrasound-guided expertise.
Debesh BHOI, Meenakshi Sundharesan A (India, New Delhi, India)
CHAMBER HALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ia16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 1
US Guided Lumbar Plexus Block: Parasaggital and Samrock Approaches for Hip and Knee Surgery

WS Expert: Xavier SALA-BLANCH (chief of orthopedics anaesthesia) (WS Expert, BARCELONA, Spain)
220a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ib16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 2
Basic Knowledge for US Guided Central Blocks

WS Expert: Margaretha (Barbara) BREEBAART (anaesthestist) (WS Expert, Antwerp, Belgium)
220b

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ic16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 3
Fascial Plane Blocks for Breast Surgery

WS Expert: Teresa PARRAS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, Spain, Spain)
221a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Id16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 4
US Guided Vascular Access in ICU and ER

WS Expert: Jens BORGLUM (Clinical Research Associate Professor) (WS Expert, Copenhagen, Denmark)
221b

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ja16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 5
RA in Trauma and ICU Patients: Which Blocks for Which Indications? - How to Avoid Masking Compartment Syndrome?

WS Expert: Barbara RUPNIK (Consultant anesthetist) (WS Expert, Zurich, Switzerland)
221c

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jb16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 6
Clavicular Fractures: What RA technique is the best?

WS Expert: Laurent DELAUNAY (Anaesthesiologist, Intensivist and perioperative medicine) (WS Expert, ANNECY, France)
221d

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jc16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 7
AI to improve ultrasound imaging

WS Expert: James BOWNESS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, London, United Kingdom)
223a

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jd16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 8
Blocking for Paediatric Hip Surgery

WS Expert: Can AKSU (Associate Professor) (WS Expert, Kocaeli, Turkey)
223b

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ka16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 9
Phrenic Nerve Sparing Blocks for Shoulder Surgery

WS Expert: Kamen VLASSAKOV (Chief,Division of Regional&Orthopedic Anesthesiology;Director,Regional Anesthesiology Fellowship) (WS Expert, Boston, USA)
223c

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kb16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 10
Blocks for Hip Surgery

WS Expert: Maria Teresa FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN (Anaesthesiologist and researcher) (WS Expert, Valladolid, Spain)
223d

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kc16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 11
Blocks for Pelvic Surgery

WS Expert: David JOHNSTON (ESRA diploma examiner) (WS Expert, Belfast, United Kingdom)
241

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kd16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 12
Blocks for Foot and Ankle Surgery

WS Expert: Ashwani GUPTA (Faculty and EDRA examiner) (WS Expert, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom)
242

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
La16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 13
Blocks for Hip Surgery

WS Expert: Dario BUGADA (staff anesthesiologist) (WS Expert, Bergamo, Italy)
243

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lb16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 14
Brachial Plexus Blocks

WS Expert: Sina GRAPE (Head of Department) (WS Expert, Sion, Switzerland)
244

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lc16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 15
QLB

WS Expert: Wojciech GOLA (Consultant) (WS Expert, Kielce, Poland)
245

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ma16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 16
Blocks for Breast Surgery

WS Expert: Juan Carlos DE LA CUADRA FONTAINE (Associate Clinical Professor/ Anesthesiologist/ LASRA President) (WS Expert, Santiago, Chile)
246

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mb16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 17
Femoral Triangle and ACB

WS Expert: Thomas Fichtner BENDTSEN (Professor, consultant anaesthetist) (WS Expert, Aarhus, Denmark)
247

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mc16
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 18
Neuraxial Blocks in Paediatrics

WS Expert: Karen BORETSKY (Senior Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine) (WS Expert, BOSTON, USA)
248

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A13
14:00 - 14:50

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Intrathecal opioids
CENTRAL NERVE BLOCKS (CNBs)

Chairperson: Narinder RAWAL (Mentor PhD students, research collaboration) (Chairperson, Stockholm, Sweden)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Narinder RAWAL (Mentor PhD students, research collaboration) (Keynote Speaker, Stockholm, Sweden)
14:05 - 14:20 Worldwide use: Results of our questionnaire. Josephine KELLER (-) (Keynote Speaker, Stockholm, Sweden)
14:20 - 14:35 Safety of intrathecal opioid use. Eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Lausanne, Switzerland)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL
15:00

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
O18
15:00 - 18:00

OFF SITE - Hands - On Cadaver Workshop 3 - RA
UPPER & LOWER LIMB BLOCKS, TRUNK BLOCKS

WS Leader: Sebastien BLOC (Anesthésiste Réanimateur) (WS Leader, Paris, France)
Unique and exclusive for RA & Pain Cadaveric Workshops: Only whole-body cadavers will be available for the workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity to master your needling skills, perform the actual blocks on fresh cadavers and to improve your ergonomics under direct supervision of world experts in regional anaesthesia and chronic pain management. There won’t be an organized transportation for going/back from the Cadaver workshop.
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 1. Upper Limb Blocks. Vicente ROQUES (Anesthesiologist consultant) (Demonstrator, Murcia. Spain, Spain)
ISB, SCB, AxB, cervical plexus (Supine Position)
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 2. Upper Limb and chest Blocks. Balaji PACKIANATHASWAMY (regional anaesthesia) (Demonstrator, Hull, UK, United Kingdom)
ICB, IPPB/PSPB (PECS), SAPB (Supine Position)
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 3. Thoracic trunk blocks. Wolf ARMBRUSTER (Head of Department, Clinical Director) (Demonstrator, Unna, Germany)
Th PVB, ESP, ITP (Prone Position)
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 4. Abdominal trunk Blocks. Kris VERMEYLEN (Md, PhD) (Demonstrator, BERCHEM ANTWERPEN, Belgium)
TAP, RSB, IH/II (Supine Position)
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 5. Lower limb blocks. Michal VENGLARCIK (Head of anesthesia) (Demonstrator, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
SiFiB, PENG, FEMB, FTB, Aductor Canal B, Obturator (Supine Position)
15:00 - 18:00 Workstation 6. Lower limb blocks. Humberto Costa REBELO (Physician) (Demonstrator, Villa Nova Gaia, Portugal)
QLBs, proximal and distal sciatic B, iPACK (Lateral Position)
Anatomy Institute
COFFEE BREAK

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S1
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 1

Chairperson: Marcus NEUMUELLER (Senior Consultant) (Chairperson, Steyr, Austria)
15:00 - 15:05 #42058 - EP043 Color Doppler to confirm epidural catheter positioning in parturient; Does it help? A Prospective Observational Study.
EP043 Color Doppler to confirm epidural catheter positioning in parturient; Does it help? A Prospective Observational Study.

Labor epidural analgesia is used to alleviate labor pain, and that depends on proper needle and catheter placement. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity of color flow Doppler (CFD) in confirming the position of the epidural catheter by utilizing two approaches: the parasagittal view (PSV) and the transverse view (TV).

This is a prospective observational design study. Women in labor were categorized into two groups according to their Body Mass Index (BMI). Group C consisted of women with a BMI <35, whereas Group O consisted of women with a BMI > 35. CFD was used to detect the flow in the epidural space. Data was collected and analyzed.

In Group C, 72.2% of patients showed flow detected by PSV, compared to 45.4% in Group O, with a p-value of <0.001. The sensitivity for detecting flow in the PSV in Group C was 70.45% versus 35.23% in the TV. Group O demonstrated a sensitivity of 53.33% in the PSV versus 8% in the TV. Within Group C, the specificity for detecting CFD was 11% in the PSV and 77.78% in the TV. In Group O, the specificity was 81.82% in the PSV and 95.45% in the TV. The PPV for the PSV and TV in Group C were 88.57% and 93.9%, respectively. In Group O, the PSV had a PPV of 91% versus 85% in TV.

CFD provides a valuable and readily available tool for accurately determining the placement of the epidural catheter in the epidural space during labor analgesia.
Ahmed OMRAN (Cairo, Egypt), Hanaa EL FEKY, Rabab HABEEB
15:05 - 15:10 #42275 - EP044 Utilisation of virtual reality as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia in awake upper limb surgery.
EP044 Utilisation of virtual reality as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia in awake upper limb surgery.

Background: Day case extremity surgery performed under regional anaesthesia has clear benefits in terms of efficiency and resource demand. For patients, avoidance of general anaesthesia and excellent post-operative analgesia can help with early oral intake, mobilisation and discharge. These benefits are maximal when patients undergo wide-awake surgery without any pre or intra-operative hypnotics. However, patients feel anxious at the prospect of being awake for surgery. Virtual reality has the potential to provide an immersive experience, transporting the patient away from theatre environment and help relieve anxiety during surgery. We describe a case series of 8 patients ranging from 16 to 82 years with varying levels of anxiety where VR was utilised to facilitate awake upper limb surgery Aim: To utilise VR headset to alleviate anxiety in adults undergoing awake upper limb surgery under regional anaesthesia.

Following consent, ultrasound guided nerve blocks were performed in all patients with one patient requiring 1mg of Midazolam to facilitate the block. In theatre, VR scenarios were commenced prior to surgery and continued for the duration of the procedure. Pre and post-operative pain and anxiety scores were recorded using VAS.

All procedures were completed without the need for intra-operative anxiolytic agents. In PACU, post-operative anxiety and pain scores were considerably lower compared to pre-operative scores. Rescue opioids were not required. VR was well tolerated with good patient satisfaction. Patients were discharged home the same day with simple analgesia.

We conclude VR could be a useful adjunct in minimising intra-operative sedation & anxiety during wide-awake surgeries.
Prodipta CHOWDHURY, Manju SHARMA (United Kingdom, United Kingdom), Ee Lyn CHAN, Bruce YOUNG
15:10 - 15:15 #42443 - EP045 Comparative effectiveness of intrathecal drug delivery systems in cancer-related and chronic non-cancer pain management: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
EP045 Comparative effectiveness of intrathecal drug delivery systems in cancer-related and chronic non-cancer pain management: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) provide targeted pain relief by delivering medication directly to the spinal cord, benefiting patients who do not respond to conventional treatments or experience severe side effects. However, the effectiveness and response patterns to IDDS between cancer-related and chronic non-cancer pain patients remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of IDDS between patients with cancer-related pain (C group) and those with chronic non-cancer pain (NC group).

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) provide targeted pain relief by delivering medication directly to the spinal cord, benefiting patients unresponsive to conventional treatments or experiencing severe side effects. However, the effectiveness and response patterns of IDDS between cancer-related and chronic non-cancer pain patients remain largely unexplored. This study compared the efficacy of IDDS in patients with cancer-related pain (C group) and chronic non-cancer pain (NC group).

Both groups showed significant increases in MEDD from baseline to 1-year post-implantation, with the C group requiring higher doses throughout the study period (Fig. 1). Similarly, both groups exhibited significant reductions in VAS scores; however, group C experienced greater and more sustained pain reduction (Fig. 2). A higher proportion of patients (42.9%) in the C group achieved a 50% or greater reduction in pain at 6 months compared with the NC group (12%, P = 0.04).

The patterns of pain control and changes in MEDD differed between the groups. Our findings suggest that while IDDS benefits cancer pain, its use in chronic non-cancer pain should be approached cautiously.
Eun Joo CHOI, Jiwon YOON (Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea), Hee Yeon SUNG
15:15 - 15:20 #42501 - EP046 The Value of Informed Consent During Pain - A Postpartum Questionnaire Study.
EP046 The Value of Informed Consent During Pain - A Postpartum Questionnaire Study.

Epidural analgesia, commonly used to manage labor pain, requires informed consent due to potential complications. Our study investigates the effectiveness of pre-epidural explanations for informed decision-making and explores maternal preferences for information delivery.

A questionnaire-based study surveyed postpartum parturients who received epidural analgesia at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem. The questionnaire covered demographic details, technical birth aspects, satisfaction with explanations, familiarity with epidural procedure, and overall birth satisfaction. Responses were statistically analyzed with R to gauge information comprehension and awareness of risks.

Data derived from 146 questionnaires. A majority (85%) of parturients were satisfied with birthing experience and epidural effect, deemed explanations about the procedure from anesthesiologists and midwives sufficient (51.6%-86.6%), but did not receive a sufficient explanation regarding possible complications (71.7%-81.6%). Accordingly, awareness of life-threatening complications was low (<25%). Surprisingly, most parturients preferred not to receive prenatal explanations or in-depth information on complications (53-68%). Even when stratified by parity, or pain levels at signing, parturients remained averse to knowing complications or receiving prenatal explanations. However, we identified significant differences between first-epidural and return parturients, with the former reporting increased desire to receive guidance (36.7% vs. 19.6%, p=0.028).

Maternal satisfaction with current explanations on epidural is high, and interest in additional information before birth is limited. Furthermore, women favor not delving deeply into potential complications. While these findings are hospital-specific, as it primarily involves an orthodox Jewish obstetric population, expanding the study to diverse hospital settings could offer valuable insights.
Yaara GILADI, Daniel SHATALIN, Shmuel SCHACHER (Jerusalem, Israel), Amir GILADI, Alexander IOSCOVICH, Orit NAHTOMI-SHICK
15:20 - 15:25 #42512 - EP047 Assessment and comparison of spread in thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and lumbar erector spinae block in cadavers: an anatomical study.
EP047 Assessment and comparison of spread in thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and lumbar erector spinae block in cadavers: an anatomical study.

TLIP blocks the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves, as they pass through paraspinal musculature. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anaesthetic between the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle and the transverse vertebral process targeting the dorsal rami. Both are proven useful for spine surgeries. This study compares injectate spread of these interfascial plane blocks to better understand their mechanisms and to establish if there is any difference in the drug spread.

Ultrasound guided TLIP or ESP block were given at L3 or L4 level in 4 cadavers (4 blocks each) with 20 ml of methylene blue. Classical TLIP was given between multifidus and longissimus and ESP was given between transverse process and erector spinae muscle. Anatomical dissection was carried out to look for spread to muscles, dorsal and ventral rami and epidural space

The dye spread has been demonstrated in Table 1. Higher number of dorsal rami at the origin were stained in ESP block. However, the branches of dorsal rami between multifidus and longissimus were stained in all the blocks with similar craniocaudal spread. No spread was seen in the epidural space

TLIP block is an effective alternative to ESP block for spine surgery. The dorsal rami branches between the erector spinae group of muscles were equally involved in both the blocks. Surgeries involving the back with midline incision and no lateral extension may be well covered by TLIP block which is easier and superficial than ESP block
Dhruv JAIN (New Delhi, India), Sana Yasmin HUSSAIN, Siddhavivek MAJAGE, Shailendra KUMAR, Lokesh KASHYAP, Parul KAUSHAL, Sanjeev LALWANI
15:25 - 15:30 #42657 - EP048 An audit study assessing documentation of consent for the risks associated with regional anaesthesia.
EP048 An audit study assessing documentation of consent for the risks associated with regional anaesthesia.

Consent is an essential part of the pre-operative anaesthetic assessment. The AAGBI states that ‘information about (…) associated risks should be provided to patients’, specifically stating that ‘anaesthetists should record details (…) in the patient record’ [1]. Consent has importance in ethical, professional and legal aspects and is evidenced through documentation. At Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (WWL) it had been noted that consent for regional anaesthetic risks was poorly documented. An audit was therefore undertaken.

Over 11 weeks, the pre-operative anaesthetic notes of patients undergoing regional anaesthesia were reviewed. Recorded information included the anaesthetic type, grade of consenting anaesthetist and risks that were consented for. The results for neuraxial vs peripheral block were analysed separately, and the following found.

89 notes were reviewed: 64 neuraxial anaesthetics & 25 peripheral nerve blocks. The highest frequency of consented risk was 80% for both temporary and permanent nerve damage associated with peripheral nerve block, followed by block failure at 60%. Disappointingly, for neuraxial blocks post dural puncture headache was most consented for at only 58%. Graphs 1 & 2 further detail the frequency of consented for risks.

Despite consent for risks being integral to the pre-anaesthetic assessment for both patient and clinician safety, it is poorly undertaken. This puts patients at risk of an outcome they weren’t made aware of and it is therefore paramount that methods of improving consent documentation in WWL are implemented.
Rebecca MURPHY (Manchester, United Kingdom), Patil SUSHMITA

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S2
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 2

Chairperson: Jens BORGLUM (Clinical Research Associate Professor) (Chairperson, Copenhagen, Denmark)
15:00 - 15:05 #40780 - EP049 Lower Extremity Enhanced Nerve Analgesia (LEENA): A Novel 4-in-1 Peripheral Nerve Block of the Lower Extremity.
EP049 Lower Extremity Enhanced Nerve Analgesia (LEENA): A Novel 4-in-1 Peripheral Nerve Block of the Lower Extremity.

Femoral, sciatic, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous blocks have been used individually, but combined, they can provide more effective pain relief (1-3). Combination often requires multiple needle sticks, position changes, and increased time. We developed a novel 4-in-1 block, we are calling LEENA, to target all of these nerves from a single insertion site and aim to compare this to the more conventional adductor canal block.

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lower extremity surgeries which compared patients that received the LEENA block versus a traditional adductor canal (AC) block. Matching was performed for age, weight, gender, ASA, medications used, and surgical procedure. Our primary outcomes were block time, perioperative opioids, pain scores, and strength testing 2 weeks after surgery. Data was analyzed using Stata and P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum, the Chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test.

62 patients received the LEENA block and were matched with 177 controls for a total of 239 patients. Baseline demographics were not different. The LEENA group received less opioids, had lower pain score, and required less ventilation support. Strength testing was also significantly better in the LEENA group compared to the controls 2 weeks after surgery.

The LEENA block patients had better analgesia, avoided airway manipulation in 15% of cases, and potentially improved functional outcomes two weeks after surgery. The novel block is feasible and may have significant advantages compared to the adductor canal block alone. Prospective studies are needed to study this novel approach further.
Walid ALRAYASHI (BOSTON, USA), Miheer SANE, Hanna VAN PELT, Conor MCGINN, Steven STAFFA
15:05 - 15:10 #41145 - EP050 Anesthetic And Analgesic Management In Outpatient Primary Knee And Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Focused On Patient-Centered Outcomes.
EP050 Anesthetic And Analgesic Management In Outpatient Primary Knee And Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Focused On Patient-Centered Outcomes.

Many institutions are facilitating the use of outpatient pathways for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our primary purpose in this systematic review is to assess evidence regarding the impact of neuraxial anesthesia, periarticular injection (PAI), and peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) on patient-centered outcomes for outpatient TKA and THA.

A task force of Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) experts in regional anesthesia participated in this endeavor. PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions were engineered to address the use of neuraxial anesthesia, periarticular injection, and peripheral nerve blocks on time to discharge, time to first ambulation, and pain scores. A standardized systematic approach was used in the review of the literature. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried.

The literature search yielded 3010 studies; 239 articles were assessed to be valid for formulation of our review. Only 2 studies assessed outcomes in the outpatient setting. The use of spinal anesthesia is associated with decreased postoperative pain and length of stay. The use of PAI is supported in both TKA and THA. Peripheral nerve blocks can decrease pain even in the presence of PAI among TKA patients.

Overall, our findings indicate that, while evidence exists to support the use of spinal anesthesia, periarticular infiltration, and peripheral nerve blocks, more research is needed to assess the potential impact of these techniques in an outpatient arthroplasty setting.
Alberto ARDON (Jacksonville, USA), Jinlei LI, Rebecca JOHNSON, Nigel GILLESPIE, Jean-Pierre OUANES, Ashley SHILLING, Hanae TOKITA, Sylvia WILSON
15:10 - 15:15 #42542 - EP051 Rapid accrual to a large-scale randomized trial in regional anesthesia.
EP051 Rapid accrual to a large-scale randomized trial in regional anesthesia.

Large, randomized trials in regional anesthesia are challenging for many reasons including cumbersome recruitment, high cost, and complicated logistics. Pragmatic trials integrated into routine clinical practice offer an alternative to traditional randomized controlled trials. They employ simplified logistics while retaining key elements like randomization thus enabling rapid enrollment of large numbers of patients at low cost. We present our experience successfully implementing a large, pragmatic trial in busy clinical practice with no additional research funding.

After IRB approval, patients were randomized to receive one of three “standard of care” regional block approaches for mastectomy on a monthly basis. Day-of-surgery study consent was obtained by the anesthesiologist and all trial-eligible patients received the randomized block regardless of study participation. Recruitment and participant details are presented.

Between 8/21/2019 and 4/4/2023, 1756 subjects were screened for eligibility; 1508 (86%) consented to trial participation; and 1506 subjects were included in the analysis (Figure 1). One patient (0.07%) experienced a block-related adverse event. 492 patients received paravertebral (PVB) blocks, 446 patients received combined PVB and interpectoral (PECS-1) blocks, and 567 patients received combined PECS-1 and serratus plane blocks. The three groups were extremely similar (Table 1).

Our results suggest that although selection bias is possible with monthly randomization and individual patient consent, it was not observed in this trial, perhaps expected given the very high percentage of eligible patients accrued (86%). Clinically integrated trials serve as a template for other investigations in regional anesthesia to investigate the optimal regional anesthetic technique for a particular procedure.
Hanae TOKITA (New York City, USA), Joanna SERAFIN, Taylor MCCREADY, Emily LIN, Leslie SARRAF, Geema MASSON, Cameran VAKASSI, Andrew VICKERS
15:15 - 15:20 #41445 - EP052 Relationship Between Early Intervention by Pain Physicians and Long-term Opioid Use Postoperatively: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
EP052 Relationship Between Early Intervention by Pain Physicians and Long-term Opioid Use Postoperatively: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The prolonged use of opioid medications postoperatively can lead to physiological, psychological, and even social issues for patients. Some scholars have suggested that gaps in postoperative pain management may contribute to the development of persistent postsurgical pain. However, it remains unknown whether early intervention by pain physicians postoperatively may lead to long-term opioid use issues.

This retrospective cohort study utilized the Longitudinal Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 2001 to 2018. Among 506,092 patients who underwent surgery and anesthesia, 277,658 were included in the final analysis after excluding those with missing data, obstetric or congenital surgical procedures, death or rehospitalization within 3 months post-surgery, and emergency surgeries within 3 months post-surgery. Among them, 33,984 received outpatient care from pain specialists within 90 days post-surgery, while 243,674 did not.

In both groups, the risk of long-term opioid use post-surgery was 1.716 (1.661-1.774), P < 0.0001. The risk of mortality within 3-12 months post-surgery was 0.793 (0.711-0.883), P < 0.0001. The risk of rehospitalization within 3-6 months post-surgery was 1.534 (1.469-1.603), P < 0.0001.

According to data from the Taiwan Pain Society, rehabilitation physician and anesthesiologist are the primary physicians involved in pain management in Taiwan. However, the majority of patients receiving rehabilitation care after orthopedic surgery, which is a risk factor for long-term opioid use, may contribute to the seemingly higher risk of long-term opioid use among patients receiving pain management. Further statistical analysis is needed to clarify this aspect.
Pin-Hung YEH (Changhua, Taiwan), Jing-Yang HUANG, Chao-Bin YEH
15:20 - 15:25 #42777 - EP053 Evaluation of Nerve Block Incidence and Utilization in Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.
EP053 Evaluation of Nerve Block Incidence and Utilization in Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.

Hip fractures in the elderly population necessitate effective pain management strategies to improve outcomes. Peripheral nerve blocks are recommended for their potential benefits in pain control and recovery. However, their utilization remains variable. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and determinants of peripheral nerve block use in elderly hip fracture patients, with a focus on timing and patient outcomes.

A retrospective analysis of patient charts from University Hospital and Victoria Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada, was conducted. The study included patients aged 65 years and older diagnosed who underwent emergency hip surgery between January 1, 2018, and February 29, 2024. Data on nerve block utilization, patient demographics, cognitive impairment, length of stay, and timing of block administration were collected. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests, logistic regression, and propensity score matching, was performed to examine the factors influencing nerve block utilization.

Preliminary findings suggest suboptimal utilization of peripheral nerve blocks in hip fracture surgery patients, with fewer blocks administered during off-hours and weekends compared to standard weekday work hours. Despite an annual increase in block utilization, patients during off-hours were less likely to receive blocks, indicating variation in care.

This study highlights the need for optimizing the utilization of peripheral nerve blocks in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Understanding factors influencing block administration, such as timing, patient characteristics, and cognitive impairment, is crucial for enhancing pain management practices and improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Georgia TIU (London, Canada)
15:25 - 15:30 #42827 - EP054 A subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption by 40% after hip arthroscopy: A triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
EP054 A subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption by 40% after hip arthroscopy: A triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Hip arthroscopy causes severe pain the first hours postoperative, probably due to the stretching of the hip joint capsule during surgery. Postoperative pain control is often achieved by high doses of opioids. This may cause opioid related adverse events and prolong recovery. The nociceptors in the hip joint capsule are mainly located anteriorly where the obturator nerve innervates the anteromedial part. We hypothesized that a subpectineal obturator nerve block would reduce the postoperative opioid consumption.

Forty ambulatory hip arthroscopy patients were enrolled in this randomized, triple-blind controlled trial approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics. All patients were allocated to a preoperative active or placebo subpectineal obturator nerve block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption the first three hours. Secondary outcomes were pain, nausea, and adductor strength.

Thirty-four patients were analyzed. The mean intravenous morphine equivalent consumption was reduced by 40% in the subpectineal obturator nerve block group versus the placebo group, 11.9 mg versus 19.7 mg respectively (p<0.001). See figure 1. The hip adductor strength was significantly reduced in the active group versus the placebo group, with a relative pre-/postoperative adductor strength reduction, 80% versus 38% respectively (p<0.001). No other intergroup differences were observed regarding the secondary outcomes.

A subpectineal obturator nerve block significantly reduced the postoperative opioid consumption by 40% after hip arthroscopy in this randomized, triple-blind trial.
Christian JESSEN (Horsens, Denmark), Ulrick SKIPPER ESPELUND, Lone DRAGNES BRIX, Thomas DAHL NIELSEN, Bent LUND, Thomas FICHTNER BENDTSEN

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S3
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 3

Chairperson: Dan Sebastian DIRZU (consultant, head of department) (Chairperson, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
15:00 - 15:05 #41062 - EP055 Spread of the local anesthetic via modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA): A volunteer study.
EP055 Spread of the local anesthetic via modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA): A volunteer study.

Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) is a novel truncal block first reported by Tulgar et al in 2019. It has been reported to anesthetize a broad thoracoabdominal area; however, the neuroanatomical mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted a volunteer study employing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the diffusion pattern of the local anesthetic responsible for extensive sensory area.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hokkaido University Hospital. Three healthy male volunteers were involved. Bilateral M-TAPA was performed, administering 25 mL of Gadavist® containing 0.15% levobupivacaine on each side. The local anesthetic was precisely injected between the origin of the transversus abdominis muscle and the costal cartilage following Tulgar's description. One hour following the administration, the sensory area and local anesthetic diffusion were assessed using pinprick tests and MRI, respectively.

The 6 blocks in the 3 volunteers were evaluated. The sensory loss areas at 1 hour after M-TAPA were; T9, T9–10, T9–10, T8–9, T9, and T9–10. No effect was observed in the lateral area. The MRI revealed that local aneshtetic was distributed in the transversus abdominis plane near the injection point, and the compartment on the surface of the parietal peritoneum.

In this study, the sensory loss of M-TAPA was limited to the T8–10 in the anterior abdominal wall. Also, MRI tests did not detect a local anesthetic diffusion pattern that could lead to broad anesthetized area. These results indicate the necessity of caution in presuming the extensive anesthetized area of M-TAPA.
Katsuhiro AIKAWA (Sapporo, Japan), Tatsuya KUROKAWA, Kazuma MIYATA, Tomoki ITO, Yuji MORIMOTO
15:05 - 15:10 #42188 - EP056 Introduction of a thoracic trauma protocol including implementation of an erector spinae plane (ESP) catheter service in a busy district general hospital – a re-audit with consideration of our real-world experience and challenges.
EP056 Introduction of a thoracic trauma protocol including implementation of an erector spinae plane (ESP) catheter service in a busy district general hospital – a re-audit with consideration of our real-world experience and challenges.

Following a previous audit into the management of rib fracture patients over 12 months (Jan-Dec 2021) an updated thoracic trauma protocol was introduced including offering a new ESP catheter service. We completed a re-audit of all rib fracture patients over a 12 month period to assess the impact, with audit department approval.

136 patients were identified presenting with rib fractures between October 2022 and September 2023. Data was collected from patient records on demographics, frailty, length of stay, rib fracture scores, type of analgesia, complications and appropriate referrals made. We also analysed those receiving ESP catheters in more detail (n=10).

Our dataset showed significantly less patients requiring ventilation, and trends towards reduced length of stay, critical care admission, and chest infection (see table 1). More patients were routinely reviewed by critical care outreach and the pain team. Patients having ESP catheters showed lower pain scores after insertion (see table 2 and chart 1). Interpretation requires caution due to less bilateral fractures in the re-audit cohort.

Following introduction of an updated rib fracture protocol, including a new ESP catheter service, we have shown potential improvements in key outcomes but also faced challenges in implementation. During this transitional period we faced real-world hurdles including trialling different kits, procuring appropriate pumps, provision of relevant training for anaesthetists and ward staff, and gaining departmental buy-in. Despite this, results are promising and we hope that now it's more established we can improve utilisation of the ESP service and our time to insertion prior to re-audit.
Sarah HARWOOD, Marion ASHE (Liverpool, United Kingdom), Katy PLANT, Veena GEETHA, Archana SENATHIRAJAH
15:10 - 15:15 #42478 - EP057 Ultrasonic Precision: Optimizing Perioperative Analgesia with Eco-Guided Scalp Blocks in Elective Craniotomy.
EP057 Ultrasonic Precision: Optimizing Perioperative Analgesia with Eco-Guided Scalp Blocks in Elective Craniotomy.

Scalp blocks have been described for analgesic management in craniotomies, traditionally performed using anatomical landmarks (ALGSB). In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided scalp blocks (UGSB) compared to ALGSB in patients undergoing craniotomy.

An observational prospective cohort study was conducted to compare postoperative analgesia in patients who received scalp blocks using anatomical landmarks versus ultrasound guidance (figure1). Patients who underwent craniotomy and received total intravenous general anesthesia were included in the study. The primary outcome measured was adequate pain control, defined as a pain score of less than 4 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included total postoperative opioid and non-opioid analgesic consumption.

A total of 111 patients were included in the analysis, with 59 and 52 patients receiving echo-guided and landmark-guided scalp blocks, respectively (Table 1). Adequate pain control was achieved in 80% of the patients at 6 h, 71% at 12 h, and 70% at 24 h postoperatively. The echo-guided group demonstrated significantly better pain control at 24 h than the landmark-guided group (84.7% vs. 53.8%; p<0.01). Although both groups showed low opioid use in the first 24 h, the ultrasound-guided scalp blocks group exhibited a significant reduction in morphine consumption at 24 h compared to the landmark-guided group (3 vs. 10 mg; p<0.001)(table 2).

Ultrasound-guided scalp blocks are an effective alternative to postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy. Ultrasound guidance significantly improved postoperative pain control at 24 h and reduced opioid consumption compared to anatomical landmark-guided scalp blocks.
Maria Claudia NIÑO, Darwin COHEN, Andrés Felipe ZULUAGA, Juan Fernando PARADA-MÁRQUEZ, Ana María SUÁREZ (Bogotá, Colombia)
15:15 - 15:20 #42572 - EP058 Sonoclub North West – Improving the provision of regional anaesthesia skills of trainee anaesthetists.
EP058 Sonoclub North West – Improving the provision of regional anaesthesia skills of trainee anaesthetists.

Regional anaesthesia is a core element of the Royal College of Anaesthetists curriculum and a key component as part of an independent anaesthetists practice (1,2). In our region, provision of regional anaesthesia training can be variable, therefore we created Sonoclub North West, targeting UK anaesthesia trainees aiming to improve their confidence, knowledge and skills. (3).

The course was divided into six monthly 3-hour sessions and focused on meeting the teaching standards for the RCOA curriculum for senior trainees. We divided 10-12 trainees into small groups. Each session started with theory-based teaching, including ergonomics, consent and risks, local anaesthesia (LA) choices for blocks, nerve stimulator use, LA adjuncts use and management of complications. The trainees then drew out the anatomy of nerve blocks, to reinforce their theoretical knowledge. The practical aspects focused on needling practice on phantoms and ultrasound scanning practice on models.

Trainees received the course well and felt it exceeded their RCoA learning outcomes. Their confidence in performing regional anaesthesia was significantly improved and commented the frequent sessions reinforced this compared to a one-off course. Figure 1 shows the summary of the feedback received:

We present a small group regional anaesthesia course, which revisits the core elements of performing nerve blocks. The aims of this course to improve needling and LA injection techniques and ultrasound scanning for nerve blocks were met. The feedback demonstrated that trainees preferred the spiral learning format to other regional anaesthesia courses and were able to independently perform blocks following attending to our course.
Christopher TENNUCI (Manchester, United Kingdom), Alia MAHMOOD, Ganesh HANUMANTHU, Ahmed AIYAD
15:20 - 15:25 #42643 - EP059 Phantom Pain and experience in botulinotoxotherapy.
EP059 Phantom Pain and experience in botulinotoxotherapy.

Due to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the frequency of limb injuries in the overall statistics of military trauma is more than 40%. It is important to emphasize that today's reality has brought the relatively uncommon and poorly studied phantom pain to a new level of relevance and concern. 

Botulinum toxin therapy for phantom pain and pain in the stump Blocking of cholinergic transmission at the level of the neuromuscular synapse. As a result, the nerve endings at the synapse level do not respond to nerve impulses (chemical denervation) Injection of the drug under the navigation USD-control and EMG-control. Injection doses:150-250 units per limb divided into 4-5 injection points (neuromas, trigger points), subcutaneous injection. Frequency of injection: once in 3-4 months

Injection of botulinum toxin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of various types of neuropathic pain, including phantom pain after limb amputations, which is not treated with first-line drugs This treatment technique allows the patient to get rid of pain almost completely for a long period. From a personal perspective, the use of botulinum toxin has proven to be effective in 80% of the cases among 42 military amputees Pain reduction on the scale of VAS: from 8-9 points to 3-4 points Botulinum toxin is effective treatment for hyperhidrosis of the limb stump, which ultimately significantly expands rehabilitation opportunities

Botulinum toxin type A is a safe alternative to strong opioid therapy in cases of high-intensity PHP can significantly reduce the dose and duration of narcotic painkillers.
Nadiya SEGIN (Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)
15:25 - 15:30 #42710 - EP060 A Comparison Between Interscalene and Costoclavicular Blocks for Pain Relief After Shoulder Surgery.
EP060 A Comparison Between Interscalene and Costoclavicular Blocks for Pain Relief After Shoulder Surgery.

Shoulder surgeries are among the most painful surgical procedures in orthopedic practice.Interscalene brachial plexus block(ISB), although the most commonly utilized regional anesthesia technique for alleviating pain following shoulder surgery, may result in side effects such as hemidiaphragmatic paresis and Horner's syndrome.More distal blocks along the brachial plexus may provide postoperative analgesia while potentially having less effect on respiratory functions.The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postoperative pain scores between ISB and costaclavicular brachial plexus block(CCB).Secondary endpoints were adverse events and postoperative opioid consumption

Our study is a prospective observational study.Following ethical approval, a total of 62 patients undergoing for shoulder surgery under general anesthesia between 01.11.2022 and 01.11.2023 were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent.The local anesthetic agent(20mL of bupivacaine 0.25%) were identical for all study participants.A blinded investigator recorded pain scores at rest at 0.5,1,6,12,18 and 24 hours.Postoperative opioid consumption,time to first analgesic request and adverse effects were statistically compared

In both groups,VAS pain scores were similar at 0.5,1,2,3,6,12 and 24 hours(p>0.05).Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the ISB group compared to the CCB group.There was no significant difference between the time to first analgesic request and the need for rescue analgesia.The number of patients experiencing block-related complications(such as Horner's syndrome,hoarseness,dyspnea,etc.) was significantly higher in the ISB group compared to the CCB group(25%vs.0%;P<0.05)

In patients where preserving lung function is prioritized in relieving pain during shoulder surgery, CCB may useful analgesic alternative to ISB with fewer adverse complications
Muhammed Halit TEKECI (Sakarya, Turkey), Havva KOCAYIGIT, Bayazit DIKMEN

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S4
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 4

Chairperson: David MOORE (Pain Specialist) (Chairperson, Dublin, Ireland)
15:00 - 15:05 #41171 - EP061 Stellate Ganglion Catheter Placement for Pre-surgical Evaluation of Therapy for Prinzmetal Angina.
EP061 Stellate Ganglion Catheter Placement for Pre-surgical Evaluation of Therapy for Prinzmetal Angina.

Prinzmetal angina is a know condition of intermittent segmental spasm in the coronary arteries causing transient ischemia resulting in angina and electrocardiographic ST elevation. Medical treatment includes both calcium channel blockers and nitrites. We present a case of a 49-year-old male with a 30-year history of Prinzmetal angina with failed medical management for possible thoracoscopic surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation. The patient was referred for a trial stellate ganglion block to temporarily inhibit the cardiac sympathetic chain.

A left stellate ganglion catheter was placed at anterior C 6 tubercle under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Contrast was injected into the catheter to confirm appropriate spread of contrast in the region of the stellate ganglion. ( Fig 1) A pulsed dose of 5 cc every 2 hours of 0.2 % ropivacaine was infused for 3 days. The patient had significant reduction of pain and incidence of his symptoms and elected for surgery. The patient underwent bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy for permanent treatment of his Prinzmetal angina. Of interest 5 cc of methylene blue dye was injected into the left sided catheter immediately prior to surgery and was seen in the right, and not the left chest. Fig2

The patient had significant reduction of the severity and incidence of his Prinzmetal angina. He has decreased his dose of nitrites and calcium channel blockers and is normotensive. Stellate ganglion catheters provide an extended trial of cardiac sympathectomy and may be helpful in predicting success of surgery.
Steven CLENDENEN (Ponte Vedra Beach, USA)
15:05 - 15:10 #41346 - EP062 The Role of Perioperative Point-of-Care Knee Ultrasound in Distinguishing Unicompartmental from total Knee Arthroplasty.
EP062 The Role of Perioperative Point-of-Care Knee Ultrasound in Distinguishing Unicompartmental from total Knee Arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental arthroplasty provides an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) affecting a single knee compartment, typically the medial compartment, and less commonly the lateral compartment. Patients undergo orthopaedic assessment for surgical suitability based on examination and X-ray findings of unicompartmental OA before surgical consideration. Sometimes, due to inconclusive X-ray findings or a long waiting time between initial X-ray findings and booking for surgery, the patient's knee OA can progress, and surgeons may opt for intraoperative conversion to TKA based on direct knee cartilage assessment. Can ultrasound effectively assess both knee compartments to confirm the diagnosis?

In this retrospective review of 35 patients scheduled for medial compartment knee arthroplasty, an ultrasound examination of the medial and lateral compartments and the posterior knee was conducted during genicular nerve and IPACK blocks. Findings in patients with advanced medial compartment arthritis (image1): 1.Bulging of the medial collateral ligament, 2.Bulging of the medial meniscus, 3.Osteophyte formation, 3-joint space narrowing, 4.Occasional joint effusions and Baker's cysts.

Similar ultrasound findings were observed in 7 out of 35 patients within the lateral compartment. These results were communicated to the surgeon. These findings were confirmed intraoperatively by direct assessment of the joint by the surgeon, ultimately leading to conversion to TKA for all eight patients.

In this retrospective review, point-of-care ultrasound was performed after spinal anaesthesia. A pre-anaesthetic ultrasound examination of the knee by the anaesthetist may confirm the diagnosis and allow adjustment of spinal anaesthesia dosage to accommodate surgical timing for unicompartmental versus TKA.
Tam AL-ANI (Glasgow, United Kingdom)
15:10 - 15:15 #42037 - EP063 Effect of ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block in tonsillectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.
EP063 Effect of ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block in tonsillectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.

Severe postoperative pain due to tonsillectomy inhibits patients’ early oral intake and recovery after surgery. The maxillary and glossopharyngeal nerves doubly innervate the tonsils, and it is unclear which nerve is more involved in the pain. Although ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block (MaxNB) has been administered to the dental surgery, the postoperative analgesic efficacy of MaxNB for tonsillectomy has not yet been studied in controlled trials.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Sapporo Medical University Hospital (322-294). Forty-four patients aged 18 years or older undergoing tonsillectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to the block or placebo group. Both groups received ultrasound-guided bilateral MaxNB under general anaesthesia, with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per site in the block group and the same volume of saline in the placebo group. Patients were provided with intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia after surgery. The primary outcome was a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at rest at return to the ward, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after return.

One patient was excluded due to refusal to participate in the study. Twenty and 23 patients completed the study in the block and placebo groups, respectively. The VAS scores were not significantly different between the groups at any point during the 24 hours postoperatively. Median [IQR] cumulative fentanyl consumption was not significantly different (block: 50 [20-170] vs. placebo: 40 [0-140] μg/day, p=0.62).

MaxNB for adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy did not decrease VAS scores and fentanyl consumption for 24 hours postoperatively compared to placebo.
Mami MURAKI (Sapporo, Japan), Tomohiro CHAKI, Sho KUMITA, Atsushi SAWADA, Michiaki YAMAKAGE
15:15 - 15:20 #42581 - EP064 Comparison of analgesic efficacy of parasacral sciatic and pericapsular nerve block versus pericapsular nerve block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial.
EP064 Comparison of analgesic efficacy of parasacral sciatic and pericapsular nerve block versus pericapsular nerve block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial.

Postoperative pain is a common concern associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesised that the concurrent administration of pericapsular (PENG) and parasacral (PS) sciatic block will result in superior postoperative analgesia in individuals undergoing THA. Our primary objective was to compare 24-hour opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) muscle strength (hip adductors, plantar flexors and quadriceps) and any adverse effect.

Sixty 18 to 75 years old American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class I and II undergoing THR under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive: 20 mL of 0.2 percent ropivacaine in PENG block (Group P) or PENG and PS sciatic block (20 ml of 0.2%) in Group PS. Pain scores and muscle power (quadriceps, hip adductors and plantar flexors) were measured at 1,4,8,12,24 and 48 hours. Fentanyl consumption was measured at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively.

The mean 24 and 48-h fentanyl consumption was statistically more in Group P. Resting and Dynamic NRS scores were lesser in Group PS at all time intervals. Quadriceps muscle power at different time intervals reveal no statistically significant difference. Plantar flexor strength was more in Group P at 1 hour and 4 hour while hip adductor strength was more at 1 hour.

Adding a PS sciatic nerve block to PENG block increases its analgesic efficacy with decrease in muscle power at 1 and 4 hours. Further randomised trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Sreehari NAMBIAR, Chandni SINHA (Patna, India)
15:20 - 15:25 #42726 - EP065 Comparison of different injectate volume on spread of drug in intermediate cervical plexus block: A cadaveric study.
EP065 Comparison of different injectate volume on spread of drug in intermediate cervical plexus block: A cadaveric study.

Cervical plexus block (CPB) is a an effective block for providing anaesthesia for head and neck region. Intermediate CPB involves drug deposition deep to investing layer of deep cervical fascia and has shown to provide similar efficacy to deep CPB. We anticipate that higher volume of drug will result in spread beyond the prevertebral fascia and blockade of phrenic nerve. The aim of this cadaveric study is to evaluate and compare the drug spread in intermediate CPB using two different volumes – 10 or 20 ml.

Ultrasound guided intermediate CPB was given with either 10 or 20 ml of methylene blue on 4 fresh soft embalmed cadavers bilaterally at the level of C4. Anatomical dissection was performed to look for dye spread to cervical plexus, brachial plexus, phrenic nerve, carotid sheath and deep cervical nerve roots.

Branches of cervical plexus were stained in all the blocks. Higher volume of drug resulted in deep staining of phrenic nerve and upper trunk of brachial plexus. Carotid sheath and vagus nerve was also involved in 2/4 (50%) of CPB with 20 ml. With 10 ml of injectate volume, phrenic nerve was lightly stained in 3/4 (75%) of the blocks. Cervical nerve roots were not stained in any of the blocks.

Both low and high volume result in consistent spread to superficial cervical plexus branches. These findings support use of 10 ml of drug in intermediate CPB for providing analgesia for neck surgeries with possible sparing of phrenic nerve and brachial plexus function.
Sana Yasmin HUSSAIN (New Delhi, India), Dhruv JAIN, Shailendra KUMAR, Lokesh KASHYAP, Parin LALWANI
15:25 - 15:30 #42840 - EP066 Post peripheral nerve block follow up in a tertiary care orthopaedic hospital.
EP066 Post peripheral nerve block follow up in a tertiary care orthopaedic hospital.

Regional anaesthesia offers several advantages including early recovery and early discharge. The incidence of long-term complications with Peripheral Nerve blocks (PNB)is 0.02%.Follow up is important to understand the local incidence rate, for early detection and timely intervention of treatable cause and improving patient trust and assurance.We aimed to evaluate our follow up practice and further improve it .

We are a specialist orthopaedic centre performing more than 2000 PNBs in a year. Patient records were reviewed retrospectively over two weeks. Follow up pathway was determined depending on patient’s post operative destination of either discharged home or to the inpatient ward.Telephonic follow up for day case patients and a baseline survey for junior doctors/ nurses in the ward was done to evaluate our practice.

101 peripheral nerve blocks were performed on 76 patients in two weeks .17% of these patients were discharged home the same day. Less than 30 % of these patients had a follow up before discharge. While 63% received verbal aftercare instructions, only 27% received written instructions. For inpatients, 35 junior doctors and nurses were surveyed. While 45 % reported documenting about limb observations post block, only 37% routinely advised about post nerve block limb precautions .

Limited Follow up,deficiency in aftercare instructions and knowledge of junior doctors/ nurses has been recognised. We recommend written instructions should be provided to all day cases and regular teaching sessions for junior doctors/nurses. Further improvement with development of a local patient care pathway and possibly exploring digital based F/U in future.
Deepa DIVAKAR (London, United Kingdom), Maria Paz SEBASTIAN

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S5
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 5

Chairperson: Livija SAKIC (anaesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Zagreb, Croatia)
15:00 - 15:05 #41170 - EP067 Dome-shaped electrodes for pain management in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation:a modeling study.
EP067 Dome-shaped electrodes for pain management in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation:a modeling study.

Background and aims Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an established technique for pain management. There is evidence that stimulation delivered through a dome-shaped electrode is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with conventional flat patch electrodes currently utilized in TENS, due to a greater depth and area of electrical stimulation. The aim was to investigate this using computational modelling analysis

Methods A 3D finite element model of cutaneous tissue coupled with an active model of nerve fiber was developed, for simulation of E-fields originating from various electrode geometries and stimulation configurations. Outputs from the tissue model were transferred into the nerve model to determine the minimum currents required to activate cutaneous fibers. The efficacy was based on the level of activation of Aβ, Aδ and C fibers.

Results Dome-shaped electrodes required significantly lower device current to activate nerve fibers compared with flat TENS electrodes. The depth of electrical stimulus was 4x greater and the area of field activation 40% greater. The maximum amplitude was 40x higher with the dome shaped electrode compared to TENS electrodes at depths < 2 cm. The dome-shaped electrode could activate large nerves at up to ~1 cm depth with current < 30 mA, whilst TENS could only do so at < 0.25 cm.

Conclusion A dome-shaped electrode appears to recruit more nerves at the same level of stimulating current due to its greater depth of penetration and activation field compared with conventional TENS. This may equate with improved pain and functional outcomes for patients.
Teodor GOROSZENIUK (London, United Kingdom), Ilya TAROTIN, Maria CARNARIUS, Mikhail BASHTANOV, Christopher CHAN
15:05 - 15:10 #41224 - EP068 Comparing the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block vs. palatal block for postoperative analgesia in children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
EP068 Comparing the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block vs. palatal block for postoperative analgesia in children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital abnormality necessitating early surgical intervention. Palatoplasty, aimed at restoring normal anatomy, poses postoperative challenges including pain and complications. Traditional pain management with opioids and NSAIDs presents risks, prompting exploration of regional nerve blocks. This study compares the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) and palatal block for postoperative analgesia in children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty. The aim is to compare SPGB and palatal block efficacy on postop- analgesia .Primary objectives include assessing postoperative analgesia using FLACC score. Secondary objectives was to evaluate need of rescue analgesia need and parental satisfaction.

This is prospective randomized controlled study . A sample size of 50 (25 per group) was calculated. Children aged 1-5 years with cleft palate meeting inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups: palatal block (Group A) and SPGB (Group B). Both blocks were given after administration of general anaesthesia. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using FLACC score and parental satisfaction was assessed using Likert scale.

Result shows postoperative pain using the FLACC scale scores were lower significantly in Group B at various time points (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-operatively) compared to Group A (p<0.001 ). Group B requiring significantly less rescue analgesia compared to Group A(p=0.001). Parental satisfaction, assessed on a Likert scale, was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (p=0.004).

Regarding optimal pain management strategies for children undergoing palatoplasty sphenopalatine ganglion block provide better postoperative analgesia along with parental satisfaction than palatal block.
Priya PRIYA TIWARI, Manish SINGH (LUCKNOW, India)
15:10 - 15:15 #41585 - EP069 Blinding of study drugs in clinical trials: a simple approach to reduce bias.
EP069 Blinding of study drugs in clinical trials: a simple approach to reduce bias.

Effective blinding in clinical trials is crucial to avoid bias. We collected secondary data to assess the adequacy of investigators' blinding to study drugs during five prospective randomised, double-blind studies to estimate optimal local anaesthetic doses for axillary, interscalene and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (BPB).

Following an ethics committee-approved study protocol, an investigator divided a local anaesthetic's study dose into four or six 10 mL syringes, covering their barrels entirely with an opaque tape. An expert anaesthetist performed the required ultrasound-guided BPB using these syringes. We asked this anaesthetist to guess the drug volume used at the end of the injection. Importantly, we did not inform them of the accuracy of their guess and chose patients randomly. We recorded this data and analysed it using SPSS 29.

We collected data for 20 out of 81 axillary blocks, 11 out of 46 interscalene blocks, and 22 out of 73 supraclavicular blocks. The error in the guesses ranged from -55% (underestimate) to 100% (overestimate), and the median of errors was –11%. Figure 3 shows the variability in the guess accuracy at different local anaesthetic volumes.

We demonstrate that robust blinding of drug syringes is possible using a simple method of carefully placing opaque tape covering their barrels entirely. The blinded investigators cannot correctly guess the volume of a drug injected, e.g., by looking at the position of the syringe plunger or the ultrasound machine’s screen, preserving the data integrity. Reference: Day SJ, Altman DG. Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ.2000;321(7259).
Anurag VATS (Leeds, United Kingdom), Pawan GUPTA, Andrew BERRILL, Heidi HACKNEY, Sarah ZOHAR, P.m. HOPKINS
15:20 - 15:25 #42497 - EP071 Intrathecal neurolysis for the management of refractory pain in a patient with terminal oncological disease: A case report.
EP071 Intrathecal neurolysis for the management of refractory pain in a patient with terminal oncological disease: A case report.

Severe pain is a prevalent problems associated with advanced oncological disease. Interventional pain management as nerve blocks, neurolysis, or placement of epidural and peripheral catheters with drug infusions has been shown to improve pain control and decrease the need for systemic opioids. Intrathecal neurolysis is a chemical destruction of the nerves; it aims to provide analgesia by administration of neurolytic substances in the subarachnoid space.

A 47-year-old female patient with a history of a metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, with rapid and progressive advance of the disease; therefore, she received multiple therapeutic and interventional options to relieve pain, was refractory to different drug combinations and interventions, at fisical exam she had advanced terminal disease with motor involvement in the lower limbs secondary to tumor infiltration, with a muscle strength of 2/5 in the left lower limb and 3/5 in the right lower limb, had a derivative colostomy and urinary catheter

By prone midline approach, the L5–S1 intervertebral level was located in an AP view, a needle was inserted into the subarachnoid space, was confirmed with contrast medium, and return of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was observed, 2 ml of 96% absolute alcohol was injected very slowly, and the patient was kept in the prone position for 30 min. The procedure was performed without complications.

This is an accessible and cost-effective procedure, its use should be encouraged, since it could be a helpful alternative for the management of patients with refractory pain in the terminal stage.
Rangel Jaimes GERMAN WILLIAM, Cediel Carrillo XIMENA JULIETH (Bucaramanga, Colombia, Colombia), Ortega Agon KARINA ALEJANDRA, Rangel Jaimes DANIELA, Cabeza Diaz KAROL NATHALIA, Camargo Cardenas ANAMARIA
15:25 - 15:30 #42807 - EP072 Rebound Pain with ambulatory Perineural Catheter for Rotator cuff repair.
EP072 Rebound Pain with ambulatory Perineural Catheter for Rotator cuff repair.

The appearance of sudden intense pain, after a peripheral nerve block ceases, is kown as Rebound Pain (RP). The reported frequency is described as between 40-60%. To reduce its occurrence, the use of adjuvants and the use of perineural catheter have been described. Dexamethasone, both perineural and also intravenously, reduces the incidence of RP. The risk decreases to approximately 10-20%. The methodology of studies using continuous technique has not allowed us to further clarify the benefit of their use. Our objective was to measure the incidence of RP in patients undergoing shoulder rotator cuff surgery with the use of home perineural catheters in our postoperative ambulatory REDCAP registry.

The study has ethics committee approval. A review of REDCAP was carried out from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023, extracting data from patients with a diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. Pain >7 on a scale of 0-10 was considered rebound pain.

495 patients were identified. 58 were lost to post-discharge follow-up (11.7%). Among the remaining 437 patients, 81 (18.5%) reported pain >7 at least once. On first postoperative day, 26 (5.7%). On 2nd postoperative day, 33 patients (7,8%) At the end of the infusion, 5,8 % of patients reported rebound pain according to the work definition.

These results are lower (not staistacally comparable) than those described with a single injection after 24 hours with or without adjuvants. It is interesting to know that the phenomenon can also occur after 48 and a60 hours when the blockade ends.
Juan Carlos DE LA CUADRA FONTAINE (Santiago, Chile), Pablo MIRANDA HIRIART, Christopher MORRISON, Fernando ALTERMATT

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S6
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 6

Chairperson: Thomas WIESMANN (Head of the Dept.) (Chairperson, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)
15:00 - 15:05 #39905 - EP073 Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block vs. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: a randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial.
EP073 Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block vs. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: a randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial.

To compare the effect of ultrasound-guided PENG block vs ESPB on pain scores, opioid requirements, and stress response to surgery expressed by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in children scheduled for hip surgery.

90 patients aged 2-7 years, ASA PS I-III were randomised into 3 equal groups, each receiving a PENG block, ESPB, or control group (CG). In all groups, sedation was performed with continuous propofol infusion at 5mg/kg/h. Spontaneous ventilation was maintained with an oxygen mask at 2 L/min. Spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.1ml/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine. After the spinal anaesthesia, the block was performed with 0.5/kg mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain scores (FLACC). The secondary outcomes included postoperative NLR, PLR, and cumulative opioid consumption.

The FLACC score was significantly lower in the ESPB and PENG groups compared to the CG (p<0.0001), as seen in Table 2. The NLR and PLR levels were significantly lower in the PENG and ESPB groups (p<0.0001) compared to the CG. There was no difference in NLR and PLR levels between the PENG and ESPB groups. The cumulative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG and ESPB groups compared to the CG (p<0.0001). Also, 43% of children in the PENG group and 50% of children in the ESPB group did not require opioids postoperatively, as seen in Table 3.

PENG block and ESPB provide better analgesia, lower opioid consumption and lower NRL and PLR levels after hip surgery.
Malgorzata DOMAGALSKA (Poznan, Poland), Tomasz REYSNER, Piotr JANUSZ, Milud SHADI, Katarzyna WIECZOROWSKA-TOBIS, Tomasz KOTWICKI
15:15 - 15:20 #42496 - EP077 Effects of scalp nerve block on symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis for moyamoya disease.
EP077 Effects of scalp nerve block on symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis for moyamoya disease.

This study determined whether scalp nerve block (SNB) could reduce the incidence of postoperative symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (SCHS) in adult patients who underwent after superficial temporal artery (STA)–middle cerebral artery (MCA) anastomosis for moyamoya disease (MMD).

Patients undergoing STA-MCA anastomosis for MMD were retrospectively divided into SNB (n = 167) and control (n = 221) groups depending on whether SNB was performed at the end of surgery. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the two groups. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative SCHS.

The incidence of postoperative SCHS was not different between the SNB and control groups (62 [37.1%] vs 100 [45.2%], P = 0.133), but its duration was shorter in the SNB group (3 [2–6] vs 5 [3–7] d, P = 0.014). The SNB group had lower pain scores (postoperative day [POD] 0: 2 [1–3] vs 3 [1–4], P = 0.004; POD 1: 2 [1–2] vs 2 [1–3] d, P = 0.039) and systolic blood pressures (POD 0: 129 [121–137] vs 139 [130–149] mmHg, P < 0.001; POD 1: 125 [117–136] vs 131 [124–139] mmHg, P < 0.001) and shorter lengths of intensive care unit (1 [1–2] vs 2 [1–2] d, P < 0.001) and hospital (10 [9–13] vs 10 [8–14] d, P = 0.044) stays.

Despite some benefits, SNB did not reduce the incidence of SCHS after STA–MCA anastomosis for MMD.
Seungeun CHOI (Seoul, Republic of Korea)
15:20 - 15:25 #42524 - EP078 Establishing a dedicated anaesthetics service for chest wall blocks in rib fracture patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
EP078 Establishing a dedicated anaesthetics service for chest wall blocks in rib fracture patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Located in a non-trauma centre, our department grapples with logistical hurdles in providing comprehensive care for rib fracture patients. Recognising this challenge, we endeavour to establish a consistent and dedicated anaesthetics service to optimise patient management. This study aims to evaluate the demographic profile of our patient population and assess the impact of chest wall blocks, seeking evidence to support our initiative.

A random retrospective review of 30 rib fracture patients referred to our pain team between October 2023 and April 2024, identified through the pain team register, was conducted. Data encompassing demographics, medical history, and outcomes were collated. Erector Spinae or Serratus Anterior blocks were administered to 14 patients, while the others received standard treatment. Detailed results are delineated in Table 1.

Although the two groups had comparable age and STUMBL scores, the patients who received blocks exhibited more respiratory comorbidities. Nevertheless, outcomes, inclusive of hospital stay length and ICU admissions, demonstrated parity between groups. No fatalities were recorded.

Our analysis underscores the potential benefits of providing chest wall blocks in rib fracture patients, particularly those with concomitant respiratory comorbidities. We advocate for the establishment of a dedicated anaesthetics service, supported by our local safety protocol and ongoing training initiatives for practitioners. This strategic approach aims to refine analgesic care and enhance patient outcomes within this vulnerable demographic, aligning with our commitment to comprehensive and consistent patient-centred care.
Kamal BERECHID (Manchester, United Kingdom), Jincy VELUTHEPPILLY, James SMALL

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP02S7
15:00 - 15:30

ePOSTER Session 2 - Station 7

Chairperson: Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Chairperson, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
15:05 - 15:10 #42705 - EP080 Analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block vs adductor canal and anterior cutaneous branches of formal nerve block in endoscopic knee surgery analgesia.
EP080 Analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block vs adductor canal and anterior cutaneous branches of formal nerve block in endoscopic knee surgery analgesia.

The use of adductor canal block (ACB) for post endoscopic knee surgery (EKS) analgesia is a widely accepted technique. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of combining ACB with anterior cutaneous femoral nerve block (ACFB) against ACB alone in EKS.

A single blind randomized observational study of 35 patients in each group of ACB only (Gr-A) and ACB with ACFB (Gr-B). Both Gr-A and Gr-B received 25 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with additional 3-5 ml for intermediate and medial femoral cutaneous nerve block (ACFB) in Gr-B. Both groups received routine paracetamol and rescue analgesia was maintained by PCA morphine. All patients were operated under spinal anesthesia. 24 hours data collected for vitals, duration of analgesia, morphine consumption and complications.

Demographically and hemodynamically all the groups were not significantly different, but Gr-B showed lower morphine consumption (5.5 ± 0.4) mg than Gr-A (7.4 ± 0.6) mg (p < 0.05) and longer duration of analgesia (6.7 ± 0.2) hour for Gr-B and (6.1 ± 0.3) for Gr-A, (p < 0.01). No significant complications observed in either group.

Addition of femoral sensory cutaneous blocks provide better analgesia and duration than adductor canal saphenous block alone in endoscopic knee surgery.
Shyama Prosad MITRA (Dhaka, Bangladesh), Salah Uddin Al AZAD, Sylvia KHAN, Lutful AZIZ
15:10 - 15:15 #42747 - EP081 Use of epidural morphine for pain management after laparotomy: case report.
EP081 Use of epidural morphine for pain management after laparotomy: case report.

Use of epidural opioids is a standard practice nowadays, not only for pain management during surgery but also in the postoperative period. It is well known that hydrophobic drugs distribute better to hydrophobic tissues such as fat located nearby epidural space instead of spreading to the cerebrospinal fluid, as is the case with fentanyl. Regarding morphine, it has been demonstrated that it is better used for spinal administration, whereas other opioids are more likely to be administered at the epidural space.

In this case report, we present an 81-year-old male patient who underwent a pancreatectomy, splenectomy and partial gastrectomy by laparotomy. Prior to surgery, thoracic epidural technique was performed, the catheter placement was checked by epidural test dose and a single bolus of morphine 2 mg, dexamethasone 4 mg and ropivacaine 0.2% 3 ml was administered.

During the procedure, we used NOL (Nociception Level Index, Medasense) to monitor the effectiveness in which it was observed that no extra analgesia was needed during the surgery with <25 NOL value in 96% of the surgical time. In the postoperative period, patient controlled analgesia was used to determine if any extra analgesia was required after the initial bolus. No pain was referred by visual analog scale until 30 hours after surgery. No postoperative complications related with the use of opioids were found.

This case report argues for the need of more studies about epidural analgesia by single bolus with morphine, dexamethasone and local anesthetics and clinical relevance for patients undergoing laparotomy.
San Luis Arranz BEGOÑA, Velasco Ramírez PABLO (Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain), Rodríguez Medina ANTONIO, Torres Dios JOSE ANGEL, Hernández Beismeisl JESSICA, Hernández Conde MARINA, Ruiz Pérez IRENE, Hernández Mesa ADRIAN
15:15 - 15:20 #42797 - EP082 Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block in adults undergoing ambulatory orthopaedic upper limb surgeries.
EP082 Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block in adults undergoing ambulatory orthopaedic upper limb surgeries.

Upper extremity surgical procedures distal to the elbow can be performed under axillary brachial plexus block. Using ultrasonography, the block can be executed in two ways – perineural (PN) and perivascular (PV). A prospective, trust-based clinical audit was designed to observe and compare these two methods. The primary outcome of the study was the time to perform the nerve block, which was defined as the time from probe placement to withdrawal of needle. The secondary outcomes were the block success rate, incidence of any complications, and onset of sensory and motor anaesthesia in the respective nerve divisions.

Findings were compared in 50 patients scheduled to undergo orthopedic surgeries distal to the elbow, under axillary brachial plexus block only In PN group, local anaesthetic was deposited individually around four nerves. In PV technique, a single injection of local anaesthetic was performed at 6 ‘o’ clock position with respect to the axillary artery, with the aim to surround the artery with drug.

PV group had a shorter procedural time of 7.64 minutes, whereas the PN group had a mean time of 10.56 minutes. PN group took longer to achieve motor anaesthesia (19.52 minutes). A higher rate of successful block was observed in the PV group (92 %) than the PN group(84%). One vascular puncture was observed in PV group.

PV technique can be used with a higher success rate in large volume centres due to shorter performance times, especially in population with complex anatomy where identification of all four nerves is difficult.
Unnati BHATIA (Greater Manchester, United Kingdom), Neeraj SHARMA
15:20 - 15:25 #42799 - EP083 SPINAL ANALGESIA VERSUS TAP BLOCK FOR LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.
EP083 SPINAL ANALGESIA VERSUS TAP BLOCK FOR LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.

Fast track surgery involves optimization intra-operative anesthesia management, postoperative pain and any side effects with the goal of reducing hospitalization. Multimodal analgesia engages loco-regional anesthesia and opioid sparing theory supporting fast track surgery.

It is a retrospective observational cohort study conduct at “Santa Maria della Misericordia” Hospital in Udine. Our primary aims was to compare the post-operative analgesia provided by TAP block versus spinal anesthesia (SA) in conjunction with general anesthesia (GA) for elective LPS hysterectomy from March to June 2023. Our secondary aims were to compare prevalence of postoperative side effects.

among 47 patients treated with LPS hysterectomy, 23 received SA and 24 TAP block. Population and surgical characteristics were comparable. The overall pain intensity score (NRS) is significantly reduced at 6h (0 vs 0.5, p 0.004) and 12h (0 vs 0.5, p 0.006) in the SA group compared with TAP block group. Equally SA group received less fentanyl IV intraoperatively (258 mcg vs 339 mcg, p 0.002), a lower cumulative dosage of ketorolac (150 mg vs 180 mg, p 0.044) and acetaminophen (4 g vs 5 g, p 0.001) at 48h. The incidence of PONV is higher in SA group (45.8% vs 13 %, p 0.024) without impact on the length of hospitalization.

Pts undergoing LPS hysterectomy have excellent pain control with both analgesic techniques, making them suitable in the fast-track gynecologic surgery setting. It will be necessary to review more data to reduce the incidence of PONV.
Sara SCAPOL, Teresa DOGARESCHI, Matteo COMUZZI, Filippo ANGELINI (Udine, Italy), Victor ZANINI, Tiziana BOVE
15:25 - 15:30 #42823 - EP084 Peri-operative Epidurals in the Mater Hospital: A 4-year Review of Trends, Practices and Complications.
EP084 Peri-operative Epidurals in the Mater Hospital: A 4-year Review of Trends, Practices and Complications.

Introduction Our objective was to examine departmental practices regarding perioperative epidural placement in the Mater Hospital over a 4-year period.

Methods Our anaesthesia information management database was queried to retrieve details of perioperative epidural placement from 2017 to 2020. Data captured included patient position, loss of resistance (LOR) technique, complications and documentation quality.

Results 1072 epidurals were placed in the study period. Epidural use declined from 309 in 2017 to 210 in 2020. There was a large decrease in epidural placement for Thoracic and Urology surgery while epidurals for Gynaecological surgery increased. In the same period there was also a large decline in abdominal blocks and an increase in thoracic blocks performed. The large majority of epidurals were sited in the sitting position using a midline approach. LOR to saline versus air was similar. Median procedure time was 25 minutes. Accidental dural puncture (ADP) rate was 2.1% (23/1072), however only 2 patients required an epidural blood patch.

Epidural use for Urology and Thoracic surgery has declined, likely secondary to greater use of laparoscopic/robotic techniques. There may be a resulting overall decline in epidural numbers although the impact of Covid-19 in 2020 prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions. The majority of clinicians adopt similar technical approaches to placement. ADP rate is similar to previously published rates and requirement for blood patching is reassuringly low.
Sarah WALSH (Dublin, Ireland)
15:30

"Wednesday 04 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B15
15:30 - 16:30

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Anatomy at it's finest
PERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCKS (PNBs)

Chairperson: Thomas Fichtner BENDTSEN (Professor, consultant anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Aarhus, Denmark)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Thomas Fichtner BENDTSEN (Professor, consultant anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Aarhus, Denmark)
15:35 - 15:50 #43494 - B15 Current Insights into Hip Joint Innervation.
Current Insights into Hip Joint Innervation.

Introduction

The innervation of the hip joint has gained attention in recent years, with research highlighting its relevance for treatments of hip osteoarthritis and its importance in contributing to pain and neuromechanics of the hip joint [1]