Saturday 08 September
Time Clyde Auditorium Lomond Auditorium Room Alsh #1 Room Alsh #2 Room Boisdale Room Carron Room Etive Room Forth Room Fyne Room Gala Room M4
08:00
08:00-18:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC04
Disaster Medicine

Disaster Medicine

Animators: Pr Francesco DELLA CORTE (Head of Emergency Department) (Animator, Novara, Italy), Dr Jeffrey FRANC (Associate Professor) (Animator, Edmonton, Italy), Pr Ives HUBLOUE (Chair) (Animator, Brussels, Belgium), Dr Mick MOLLOY (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Animator, WEXFORD, Ireland), Dr Eric WEINSTEIN (Disaster Medicine Researcher) (Animator, Summerville SC, USA)
Pre-Course Directors: Massimo AZZARETTO (Medico Specialista) (Pre-Course Director, Lugano, Switzerland), Luca RAGAZZONI (Scientific Coordinator) (Pre-Course Director, Novara, Italy)

08:00-18:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC07
SafeER PSA - Procedural sedation and analgesia for Emergency

SafeER PSA - Procedural sedation and analgesia for Emergency

Animators: Yannick GROUTARS (Animator, Den Haag, The Netherlands), Vanessa HENDRIKS-VALK (Emergency physician) (Animator, The Hague, The Netherlands), Erick OSKAM (SEH-arts) (Animator, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), Douwe RIJPSMA (Emergency Physician) (Animator, ARNHEM, The Netherlands), Dr Ruth SNEEP (Senior Research & Clinical Fellow) (Animator, London, The Netherlands), Rebekka VEUGELERS (Emergency Physician) (Animator, Goes, The Netherlands)
Pre-Course Director: Christian HERINGHAUS (Emergency Physician) (Pre-Course Director, Leiden, The Netherlands)

08:00-18:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC05
Non-vital Trauma

Non-vital Trauma

Animators: Rashid ABU-RAJAB (Consultant orthopaedic surgeon) (Animator, Glasgow, United Kingdom), Pr Abdelouahab BELLOU (Director of Institute) (Animator, Guangzhou, China), Mohamed BEN AISSA (infirmier plâtrier) (Animator, Brussels, Belgium), Alberto GREGORI (Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon) (Animator, GLASGOW), Adeline HIGUET (consultant) (Animator, BRUXELLES, Belgium), Francis LAUNOIS (Infirmier) (Animator, Grenoble, France), Patricia O'CONNOR (Consultant) (Animator, Glasgow, United Kingdom), Régis PAILHÉ (PU-PH) (Animator, Echirolles, France), Franck VERSCHUREN (MD, PhD) (Animator, Brussels, Belgium)
Pre-Course Director: Jean-Jacques BANIHACHEMI (MD PhD) (Pre-Course Director, Grenoble, France)

08:00-18:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC02
Emergency Medicine Core Competences: Survival Skills for You

Emergency Medicine Core Competences: Survival Skills for You

08:00 - 18:00 Emergency Medicine Core Competences: Survival Skills for You. Veronique BRABERS (Emergency Physician) (Animator, MOL, Belgium), Tobias BECKER (Speaker) (Animator, Jena, Germany), Nikolas SBYRAKIS (Consultant Emergency Physician) (Animator, Heraklion, Greece), Caroline HÅRD AF SEGERSTAD (Senior consultant) (Animator, Ystad, Sweden)
08:00 - 18:00 Emergency Medicine Core Competences: Survival Skills for You. Eric DRYVER (Consultant) (Pre-Course Director, Lund, Sweden), Gregor PROSEN (EM Consultant) (Pre-Course Director, MARIBOR, Slovenia)

08:30
08:30-18:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC06
EUSEM leadership course in cooperation with IEDLI and RCEM

EUSEM leadership course in cooperation with IEDLI and RCEM

Facultys: David CHUNG (Faculty, United Kingdom), Dr John HEYWORTH (Consultant) (Faculty, Southampton)
Pre-Course Directors: Dr Philip D ANDERSON (Professor) (Pre-Course Director, Boston, MA USA, USA), Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Pre-Course Director, Leeds), Dr Barbara C HOGAN (Past President of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, EuSEM) (Pre-Course Director, HAMBURG, Germany), Jan STROOBANTS (Head of the Emergency Department) (Pre-Course Director, Brecht, Belgium)

08:30-17:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC10
Advanced Paediatric Emergency Care (APEC)

Advanced Paediatric Emergency Care (APEC)

Animators: Dr Rodrick BABAKHANLOU (M.D. M.Sc.) (Animator, Edinburgh), Dr Thomas BEATTIE (Senior lecturer) (Animator, Edinburgh, United Kingdom), Javier BENITO FERNANDEZ (DIRECTOR) (Animator, BILBAO, Spain), Silvia BRESSAN (Moderator) (Animator, Padova, Italy), Santiago MINTEGI (Section Head. Pediatric Emergency Department) (Animator, Bilbao, Spain), Nadeem QURESHI (Animator, USA), Pr Hezi WAISMAN (Director, Dept. of Emergency Medicine) (Animator, Petach-Tikva, Israel), David WALKER (Speaker) (Animator, New York, NY, USA)
Pre-Course Director: Said HACHIMI-IDRISSI (head clinic) (Pre-Course Director, GHENT, Belgium)

09:00
09:00-17:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC03
Ultrasound Beginner & Advanced

Ultrasound Beginner & Advanced

Animators: Zeki ATESLI (Animator, BRIGHTON, United Kingdom), Tyler BEALES (Fellow), Nick BURJEK, Eric CHIN (Residency Program Director) (Animator, San Antonio, USA), Peter CROFT (Faculty Member) (Animator, Portland, Maine, USA), Rip GANGAHAR (Consultant) (Animator, OLDHAM), Hani HARIRI (Animator, Besançon, France), Beatrice HOFFMANN (Animator, Boston, USA), Bob JARMAN (Animator, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom), Kristy JEFFERS (Animator, SAUSHEC, USA), Ross KESSLER, Dr Nicolas LIM (Consultant Emergency Medicine) (Animator, Singapore, Singapore), Nicole LOPEZ (Animator, SAUSHEC, USA), David MACKENZIE (Director of Emergency Ultrasound) (Animator, Portland, USA), Najib NASRALLAH (PHYSICIAN) (Animator, SHEFAMER, Israel), Pr Joseph OSTERWALDER (Head of Hospital) (Animator, St. Gallen, Switzerland), Eftychia POLYZOGOPOULOU (ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE) (Animator, ATHENS, Greece), Arthur ROSENDAAL (Emergency Physician) (Animator, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Jesse SCHAEFER (Fellow), Felipe TERAN (MD) (Animator, Philadelphia, USA), Tomas VILLEN (Attending Physician) (Animator, Madrid, Spain), Kirsty WILSON (Clinical Development Fellow) (Animator, Kilmarnock, United Kingdom), Dr Joseph WOOD (Ultrasound instructor) (Animator, Phoenix, Arizona, USA)
Pre-Course Directors: Katharine BURNS (Assistant Director of Emergency Ultrasound) (Pre-Course Director, Chicago, USA), James CONNOLLY (Consultant) (Pre-Course Director, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne), Michael LAMBERT (not sure what this is for?) (Pre-Course Director, Burr Ridge, USA)
09:00 - 17:00

09:00-17:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC09
Young Investigators pre-course on Research

Young Investigators pre-course on Research

Animators: Zerrin Defne DÜNDAR (Professor) (Animator, Konya, Turkey), Luis GARCIA-CASTRILLO (ED director) (Animator, ORUNA, Spain), Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN (Chair of EuSEM Research Committee) (Animator, ANKARA, Turkey), Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Animator, Berlin, Germany), Pr Anna SLAGMAN (Professor for Health Services Research in Emergency Medicine) (Animator, Berlin, Germany)
Pre-Course Director: Said LARIBI (PU-PH, chef de pôle) (Pre-Course Director, Tours, France)

09:00-17:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC01
Non-Invasive Ventilation

Non-Invasive Ventilation

Animators: Dr Abdo KHOURY (PROFESSEUR ASSOCIE) (Animator, Besançon, France), Roberta MARINO (Chief of Borgosesia Hospital ED) (Animator, Vercelli, Italy), Patrick PLAISANCE (Head of Department) (Animator, Paris, France)
Pre-Course Directors: Roberto COSENTINI (Head of Emergency Medicine) (Pre-Course Director, BERGAMO, Italy), Paolo GROFF (Director) (Pre-Course Director, Perugia, Italy)

09:00-17:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC08
Simulation: Train the Trainers Pre-course

Simulation: Train the Trainers Pre-course

Animators: Guillem BOUILLEAU (Urgentiste - Formateur en Santé) (Animator, Blois, France), Dr Abdo KHOURY (PROFESSEUR ASSOCIE) (Animator, Besançon, France), Felix LORANG (Consultant) (Animator, Erfurt, Germany), Mohammed MOUHAOUI (Professeur) (Animator, Casablanca, Morocco), Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Animator, Paris, France)
Pre-Course Directors: Pier Luigi INGRASSIA (Pre-Course Director, Lugano, Swaziland), François LECOMTE (PH) (Pre-Course Director, Paris, France)

17:00
17:30
Sunday 09 September
Time Clyde Auditorium Lomond Auditorium Room Alsh #1 Room Alsh #2 Room Boisdale Room Carron Room Etive Room Forth Room Fyne Room Gala Room M4
08:30
08:30-13:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC12
Geriatric Emergency Medicine

Geriatric Emergency Medicine

Animators: Laura BLOMAARD (MD, PhD-student) (Animator, Leiden, The Netherlands), Pr Simon CONROY (Prof.) (Animator, Leicester, United Kingdom), Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Animator, Haarlem, The Netherlands), Simon. P. MOOIJAART (Internist-geriatrician) (Animator, LEIDEN, The Netherlands), Dr Arjun THAUR (Consultant) (Animator, London), Sarah TURPIN (Animator, London, United Kingdom), James VAN OPPEN (Clinical Research Fellow / Specialty Registrar) (Animator, Leicester), James WALLACE (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Animator, Warrington, United Kingdom), Bas DE GROOT (Emergency physician) (Animator, AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands)
Pre-Course Director: Pr Christian NICKEL (Vice Chair ED Basel) (Pre-Course Director, Basel, Switzerland)

08:30-12:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

PC11
Airway Management Precourse for inner-clinical EM

Airway Management Precourse for inner-clinical EM

Pre-Course Directors: Christian HOHENSTEIN (PHYSICIAN) (Pre-Course Director, BAD BERKA, Germany), Sabine MERZ (senior consultant) (Pre-Course Director, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany)

12:30
13:00
13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A11
TOXICOLOGY
Whats new in Toxicology

TOXICOLOGY
Whats new in Toxicology

Moderators: Kurt ANSEEUW (Medical doctor) (Antwerp, Belgium), Jason LONG (Glasgow, United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
13:00 - 14:30 Baclofen poisoning: toxicity of an off-label medication. Pr Bruno MEGARBANE (Professor, head of the department) (Speaker, Paris, France)
13:00 - 14:30 Paracetemol - new approaches to an old problem. James DEAR (Reader) (Speaker, Edinburgh)
13:00 - 14:30 Practical tips for management of toxicology patients. Frédéric LAPOSTOLLE (PU-PH) (Speaker, Bobigny, France)

13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B11
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mixed bugs everywhere

INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mixed bugs everywhere

Moderators: Christian HOHENSTEIN (PHYSICIAN) (BAD BERKA, Germany), Annmarie LASSEN (Professor in Emergency medicine) (Odense, Denmark)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
13:00 - 14:30 Pneumonia - why there is the difference between the EP and internist in ordering diagnostic tests. Pr Jim DUCHARME (Immediate Past President) (Speaker, Mississauga, Canada)
13:00 - 14:30 Rare Infectious diseases you should know. Pr Christian BACKER-MOGENSEN (Professor) (Speaker, Aabenraa, Denmark)
13:00 - 14:30 My career in pictures. Dr David CARR (Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Toronto Canada, Canada)

13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D11
Doing the basics right
Getting better at everyday topics - YEMD Session

Doing the basics right
Getting better at everyday topics - YEMD Session

Moderators: Martin FANDLER (Consultant) (Bamberg, Germany, Germany), Riccardo LETO (Emergency physician) (Genk, Belgium)
13:00 - 14:30 Everybody lies - Sono get's the truth. Katarzyna HAMPTON (Attending Physician) (Speaker, USA, Poland)
13:00 - 14:30 ECG Challenges. Delia NEBUNU (Resident) (Speaker, Bucharest, Romania)
13:00 - 14:30 The healing touch. Vimal KRISHNAN (SPEAKER & MODERATOR) (Speaker, THRISSUR, INDIA, India)
13:00 - 14:30 Emergency radiology in pregnancy. Dr Atriham ADAN (Medical Director, Emergency Department) (Speaker, Houston Texas - USA, USA)

13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E11
RESUSCITATION
End tidal CO2

RESUSCITATION
End tidal CO2

Moderators: David LOWE (Consultant) (Glasgow, United Kingdom), Marc SABBE (Medical staff member) (Leuven, Belgium)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
13:00 - 14:30 Do you hypoventilate your cardiac arrest patient? Simon ORLOB (Speaker, Graz, Austria)
13:00 - 14:30 How to push hard and fast: improving the quality of chest compressions should focus on the dynamic mechanisms. Pr Cao YU (Director) (Speaker, Chengdu, China)
13:00 - 14:30 Cardiac arrest, why I still cool the brain to 33°C. Wilhelm BEHRINGER (Chair) (Speaker, Vienna, Austria)

13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C11
Insights from China
Lessons from a country with a population of over 1,3 billion & 30,000 hospitals!

Insights from China
Lessons from a country with a population of over 1,3 billion & 30,000 hospitals!

Moderators: Luis GARCIA-CASTRILLO (ED director) (ORUNA, Spain), Dr Charles REYNARD (Emergency Medicine) (Manchester)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
13:00 - 14:30 Active abdomen compression-decompression for CPR. Wang ZHONG (Speaker, China)
President of the Chinese Association of Emergency Medicine
13:00 - 14:30 Traditional Chinese medicine and emergency clinical practice. Wei JIE (Emergency medicine) (Speaker, Wuhan, China)
13:00 - 14:30 Panel discussion. Wang ZHONG (Speaker, China), Wei JIE (Emergency medicine) (Speaker, Wuhan, China), Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy), Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Speaker, Leeds), Said LARIBI (PU-PH, chef de pôle) (Speaker, Tours, France), Luis GARCIA-CASTRILLO (ED director) (Speaker, ORUNA, Spain)

13:00-14:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F11
FREE PAPER 1
Biomarkers

FREE PAPER 1
Biomarkers

Moderators: Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN (Chair of EuSEM Research Committee) (ANKARA, Turkey), Tiziana MARGARIA STEFFEN (Ireland)
13:00 - 14:30 #14703 - FP001 Low positive predictive values for a one hour high sensitivity cardiac troponin T rule-in acute myocardial infarction algorithm in United States and international populations.
FP001 Low positive predictive values for a one hour high sensitivity cardiac troponin T rule-in acute myocardial infarction algorithm in United States and international populations.

Background: A baseline/1 hour rule-in/rule-out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) algorithm using high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) measurements is detailed in the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) guidelines. The accuracy of the positive and negative predictive values for diagnostic testing plays a key role in physician therapeutic decision making, especially for acutely ill patients.

Purpose: To determine the ESC recommended baseline/1 hour AMI rule-in (hs-cTnT at 0 hour > 52 or a 1 hour delta ≥ 5 ng/L) positive predictive value (PPV) in the REACTION-US (Rapid Evaluation of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States) study and to compare it to that reported in the TRAPID-AMI (High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay for Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infraction) international multicenter trial.

Methods: Patients presenting with any symptoms, regardless of duration, suspicious for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to the emergency department (ED) of a single US tertiary care urban center were enrolled. Baseline (within 60 minutes of triage ECG) and 1 hour blood samples were obtained and later analyzed for hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics: 99th percentile 14 ng/L, level of detection 5 ng/L) measurements at an independent core laboratory. AMI diagnosis was independently adjudicated by 2 physicians after reviewing all available 30 day clinical data and the hospital’s serial cardiac troponin I (Siemens: 99th percentile 40 ng/L) levels over 3 hours in accordance with the 3rd Universal Definition of AMI.

Results: Of the 569 enrolled subjects 44 (7.7%) had AMI: 26 type 1 (59%) and 18 (41%) type 2. After analyzing the baseline/1 hour ESC rule-in algorithm in the 542 patients with hs-cTnT values available at both times, 69 (12.7%) were placed in the AMI rule-in zone. The resulting 1 hour AMI rule-in PPV was 42.0% (95% CI: 30.2%-54.5%). In the TRAPID-AMI trial 184 (14.4%) patients were placed in the rule-in zone and with a 1 hour AMI rule-in PPV of 77.2% (95% CI: 70.4%-83.0%). The PPV for the 1 hour rule-in AMI was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the US ED population.

Conclusions: The PPV was significantly lower when the ESC guidelines AMI 1 hour rule-in were applied to the REACTION-US study as compared to the TRAPID-AMI international trial. This was likely the result of broader troponin ordering and enrollment of some dialysis patients (5.0%), which may have resulted in an increased overall number of elevated hs-cTnT measurements. The current ESC 1 hour rule-in AMI guidelines PPVs are inadequate to initiate early NSTEMI therapy in US and international ED patients as many individuals will receive unnecessary anticoagulation/additional cardiac testing. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal cut points/blood draw timing for a rapid AMI rule-in guideline resulting in much higher PPVs.

 

 

 



Henry Ford Health System, Roche Diagnostics
Richard NOWAK (Detroit, USA), Chaun GANDOLFO, Gordon JACOBSEN, Robert CHRISTENSON, Michael HUDSON, Michele MOYER
13:00 - 14:30 #14746 - FP002 The N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide/high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T ratio for differentiating type 1 from type 2 acute myocardial infarction.
FP002 The N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide/high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T ratio for differentiating type 1 from type 2 acute myocardial infarction.

Background: Type 1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is caused by coronary artery obstruction leading to decreased myocardial blood flow with myocyte necrosis while type 2 is related to non-coronary disease causing imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply/demand resulting in myocardial injury with necrosis. Accurate clinical differentiation can be difficult but is needed as specific acute therapies for each AMI type differ.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine whether the N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) ratio could help in AMI type identification in the Emergency Department (ED).

Methods: Patients presenting with any symptoms suspicious of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to the ED of a single US tertiary care urban center were enrolled. Baseline (within 60 minutes of triage ECG), 30, 60 and 180 minute EDTA blood samples were obtained and later batch analyzed for NT-proBNP (pc/ml) and hs-cTnT (99th % 14 ng/L, level of detection 5 ng/L) measurements at an independent core laboratory. AMI diagnosis was independently adjudicated by 2 physicians after reviewing all available 30 day clinical data and the hospitals serial cardiac troponin I (Siemens: 99th percentile 40 ng/L) levels over 3 hours in accordance with the 3rd Universal Definition of AMI.

Results: Of the 569 enrolled subjects 44 (7.7%) had AMI. Twenty six (59 %) had a type 1 while 18 (41%) type 2. Receiver Operator Curves (ROC) were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) used to evaluate the ability of the NT-proBNP/hs-cTnT ratios to predict type 1 from 2 AMI and the optimal cut points (OCP) determined. The AUC and OCP values at baseline, 30, 60 and 180 minutes were 0.7650 (95% CI: 0.611-0.919), 14.8; 0.7756 (95% CI: 0.627-0.925), 13.0; 0.7770 (95% CI: 0.621-0.933), 26.0 and 0.7449 (0.568-0.922, 11.0. The AUC for the changes in the NT-proBNP/hs-cTnT ratios from baseline to 30, 60 and 180 minutes were 0.5299, 0.6127 and 0.5884.

Conclusions: The ROC AUC NT-proBNP/hs-cTnT ratio values were moderate when assessed at each of the 4 sample time points but poor when looking at the changes from baseline to 30, 60 and 180 minutes. Our results can be explained as type 2 AMI results from cardiac supply/demand mismatch caused by non ACS disease resulting in increased cardiac wall stress with earlier and larger amounts of NT-proBNP, thus increasing the ratio. Further studies are needed to determine the validity of these results and how to use them to direct optimal ED AMI care



Henry Ford Health System, Roche Diagnostics
Richard NOWAK (Detroit, USA), Gordon JACOBSEN, Robert CHRISTENSON, Michele MOYER, Michael HUDSON, James MCCORD
13:00 - 14:30 #14831 - FP003 Assessment of the diagnosis value of early lactate and creatine kinase dosing after Generalized tonic-clonic seizures admitted to an emergency department.
FP003 Assessment of the diagnosis value of early lactate and creatine kinase dosing after Generalized tonic-clonic seizures admitted to an emergency department.

Introduction:

Affirming the diagnosis of Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) at arrival in the emergency department without seeing the seizure is difficult. In case of doubt, the French Society of Neurology recommends dosing creatine kinase (CK) four hours after the seizure. Several studies have looked at earlier markers such as lactate. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the interest of the lactate and CK assay in the diagnosis approach of GTCS at the arrival of the patient in an emergency department.

Material and methods:

We carried out a prospective, observational, single-center study in the emergency department of our universitary hospital from November 2016 to July 2017. An ethical opinion was obtained (CPP South-East VI) and a statement of clinical trials was carried out (NCT03163719). Patients over 18 years old with a proven GTCS were included.

Results:

Thirty four patients were included. The mean age was 48.1 +/- 20.8 years old and most of the patient were male (60.6%). The number of positive lactate dosages at arrival (H0) was higher than the number of positive CK four hour after arrival (H4) (respectively, 70.6% vs 41.2%, p = 0.008). Lactate levels decreased between H0 and H4 (respectively, 5.9 ± 5.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.4, p <0.001) while CK level increased (respectively, 308.6 ± 627.4 and 404.5 ± 615.5, p <0.001). In addition, the number of positive lactates at H0 was significantly higher than those at H4 (respectively, 70.6% vs. 2.9%, p <0.001).

Conclusion:

Our study showed the value of lactate dosing at patient arrival for suspected Generalized tonic-clonic seizures compared to the recommended four hours CK dosage. To our knowledge, this is the only prospective study describing the kinetics of lactate and CK levels at arrival and at four hours in the same patient with a strong suspicion of Generalized tonic-clonic seizures. However, other studies seem necessary to refine the lactate positivity threshold and the factors that can influence them.



Clinical trials registration: NCT03163719
Farès MOUSTAFA (Clermont-Ferrand), Arthur RAISON, Bruno PEREIRA, Haithem DEBBABI, Marie VALETTE, Bastien PAYARD, Marine MONDET, Rémi ESPENEL, Catherine MAURIN, Coralie SERRANO, Julien RACONNAT, Jeannot SCHMIDT
13:00 - 14:30 #14917 - FP004 Endothelial glycocalyx damage in the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to respiratory virus infection.
FP004 Endothelial glycocalyx damage in the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to respiratory virus infection.

Background: Endothelial glycocalyx is a network of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans that cover the endothelial surface of the vessels. This structure plays a role in controlling vascular permeability, migration of inflammatory cells and platelet aggregation.  Virus respiratory infection, mainly secondary to influenza virus, can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults mostly during outbreaks. The mechanisms responsible for this injury are not entirely known. We hypothesized that endothelial glycocalyx damage could contribute to ARDS installation after respiratory virus infection.

Methods: We included patients with flu-like symptoms admitted to emergency department divided into two groups: patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition (Group 1) and patients without ARDS (Group 2) during influenza A seasonal outbreak period. A control group of healthy individuals was included for comparison (Group 3). During the hospital admission, a venous blood sample was collected and stored at -70 degrees. Biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx damage (hyaluronan, syndecan-1, thrombomodulin) and cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1beta) were measured through commercial ELISA Kits (R&D, Minneapolis, USA). The values were shown as mean ± standard error of the mean.

Results: We included 22 patients in the group 1 (44±17 years-old, 54% male, symptoms duration: median of 5 days, intra-hospital mortality rate: 45%, IgM positive for influenza A: 30%), 33 patients in the group 2 (34±17 years-old, 45% male, symptoms duration: median of 4 days, intra-hospital mortality rate: 00%, IgM positive for influenza A: 15%) and 26 healthy individuals in the group 3 (43±10 years-old, 35% male). The hyaluronan levels were significantly higher in the group 1 (34±6 ng/ml) about the group 2 (12±4 ng/ml) and group 3 (8±4ng/ml); p<0.0001. The syndecan-1 levels were higher in the group 1 (80±18 ρg/ml) in relation to the group 2 (49±11ρg/ml), p=0.003, however, there weren’t observed a difference between group 2 and group 3. The thrombomodulin levels were significantly higher in the group 1 (1687±181ρg/ml) and group 2 (1019±143ρg/ml) in relation to the group 3 (175±116 ρg/ml); p<0.0001. In respect to the cytokines levels were not observed differences among the groups: TNF-alfa (92±49ρg/ml, 88±36ρg/ml, 200±76ρg/ml; p=0.56), IL-1beta (76±32ρg/ml, 79±25ρg/ml, 69±28ρg/ml, p=0.99) and IL-6 (114±39ρg/ml, 102±30ρg/ml, 147±49ρg/ml; p=0.73) respectively for the group 1, 2 and 3.

Discussion & Conclusions: Elevation of biomarkers of the glycocalyx endothelial damage was observed in the early phase of ARDS secondary to probable virus infection regardless of the cytokines levels suggesting the possibility of a direct virus lesion of this structure, which could have a pivotal function in ARDS development in this setting.  These biomarkers, mainly hyaluronan, could be used to select among patients with flu those with a higher risk of developing ARDS at the emergency department.  



Funding Information: FAPESP-Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-2016/22147-1
Maira Nilson BENATTI, Marcos De Carvalho BORGES, Carlos Henrique MIRANDA (Ribeirão Preto, Brazil)
13:00 - 14:30 #15519 - FP005 Biomarker risk-stratification of patients with acute dyspnea at the emergency department using soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activating Receptor: A prospective suPAR study from Sweden.
FP005 Biomarker risk-stratification of patients with acute dyspnea at the emergency department using soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activating Receptor: A prospective suPAR study from Sweden.

Background. Dyspnea is a major cause of presentation at the emergency department (ED) with a broad spectrum of underlying conditions. The prognosis varies from benign to life threatening and is difficult to determine in the acute setting. The soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) is an unspecific inflammatory biomarker of disease severity and a predictor of negative outcome. Objectives. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether suPAR can provide clinically meaningful prognostic information for 90 day mortality in patients with acute dyspnea. Method. Blood samples and vital parameters were collected from 620 patients upon admission at the ED in Malmö, Sweden. suPAR was related to 90-day mortality with Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for established risk factors; age, sex, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, C-reactive protein concentration, smoking history, kidney function, and METTS-score. Discrimination was determined with Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and accuracy by measuring Area Under the ROC-curve (AROC). Further, both category-free and categorical Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) was computed to assess prediction increment. Results. Seventy-five deaths (12.1%) were recorded within 90 days. suPAR conferred a Hazard Ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.59 (1.30-1.93, p<0.001) for 90-day mortality per 1-SD increment. Adding suPAR on top of the established risk factors increased the AROC from 0.735 (0.680-0.791, 95% CI) to 0.763 (0.706-0.820, 95% CI) and the continuous NRI was 0.48 (0.27-0.78, 95% CI; p<0.001). Conclusion. suPAR independently improves risk prediction in unselected patients with acute dyspnea. However, more studies are needed to define its role in clinical practice.



The study was supported by research grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Göran Gustafsson Foundation, the Swedish Heart- and Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Region Skåne, Skåne University Hospital and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (IRC).
Kevin BRONTON (Malmö, Sweden), Peter ALMGREN, Klas GRÄNSBO, Margaretha PERSSON, Olle MELANDER
13:00 - 14:30 #15758 - FP006 A retrospective observational study to measure the relationship between FAST, early warning scores and diagnosis of acute stroke.
FP006 A retrospective observational study to measure the relationship between FAST, early warning scores and diagnosis of acute stroke.

Background: The management of acute stroke throughout the United Kingdom has been networked since 2007. A patient with positive Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) will by-pass their local hospital and be brought to a specialist hyper-acute stroke unit (HASU) as a ‘Stroke Call’.

Upon arrival, the patient will undergo further assessment to determine the diagnosis. Patients may be found to be FAST negative: false FAST positive. After further assessment, patients may be found not to have had a stroke: stroke mimic (SM). The number of SM patients at our HASU was noted to be high and we wanted to explore the relationship between the patient’s FAST assessed by the ambulance personnel and the ED staff, national Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the final diagnosis to aid the early diagnosis of stroke and non-stroke and improve the specificity of FAST. We were unable to find any previous research in this area.

Method: We performed a retrospective observational study by reviewing the medical records of Stroke Call patients brought to our HASU September 2017 to March 2018. We calculated their NEWS on arrival, FAST and the final diagnosis. We calculated the diagnostic accuracy of FAST and looked for a statistically significant difference between the distribution of NEWS with the Kruskall Wallis Test. We looked at the relative risk of an increase in NEWS on the chance of stroke using a Multinomial Logistic Regression analysis. We compared patients who were true FAST positive vs. false FAST positive, ischaemic stroke (IS) vs. SM vs. haemorrhagic stroke (HS).

Results: We included 407 patients; 198 SM, 169 IS and 40 HS. 334 were true FAST positive and 73 were false FAST positive. The sensitivity and specificity of FAST was 92.8% (95% CI: 88.4%-95.9%) and 29.3% (95% CI: 23.1-36.2%) respectively. Kruskal Wallis Test; the difference in NEWS between the SM and IS groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05), the difference in NEWS was significant between the SM and HS groups (p=0.003) and the IS and HS groups (p=0.017).

Multinomial Logistic Regression; NEWS was not a predictor of having an ischaemic stroke in the IS group when compared to the SM group (p>0.05). A higher NEWS was a significant predictor of having a haemorrhagic stroke when compared to the SM group (odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35). A higher NEWS was a significant predictor of having a haemorrhagic stroke when compared to the IS group (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.29). For both the IS and HS groups; being true FAST positive significantly increased the chance of stroke compared to the SM group (odds ratio ischaemic 5.44, 95% CI: 2.80-10.54; haemorrhagic 5.31, 95% CI: 1.55-18.18).

Discussion & Conclusions: NEWS has limited utility in assessing whether a patient is more likely to have suffered haemorrhagic stroke than either ischaemic stroke or no stroke (stroke mimic) when presenting as a stroke call. We conclude that the specificity of FAST in our group is low and its diagnostic accuracy cannot be improved by the use of NEWS.


Jasper COUPER (London, United Kingdom), Graham FLEMING, Laszlo SZTRIHA, Jeff KEEP
13:00 - 14:30 #15855 - FP007 Use of the prognostic biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in the emergency department does not affect mortality, a cluster-randomised clinical trial.
FP007 Use of the prognostic biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in the emergency department does not affect mortality, a cluster-randomised clinical trial.

ABSTRACT

Background: Delays and crowding can increase mortality in emergency departments (EDs). Previous research has demonstrated that risk stratification can be strengthened using prognostic biomarkers, but the impact on patient prognosis is unknown. The aim of the TRIAGE III trial was to investigate whether the introduction of the prognostic and nonspecific biomarker: soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the emergency department reduces mortality in acutely admitted patients.

Methods: The TRIAGE III trial was a cluster-randomised interventional trial conducted at EDs in the Capital Region of Denmark. We included EDs with acute medical and surgical patients and no previous access to suPAR measurement in twelve cluster-periods of three weeks alternating between intervention and control. Patients were allocated to the intervention if they arrived in interventional periods, where suPAR measurement was routinely analysed at arrival. In the control periods, suPAR measurement was not performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality ten months after admission. Secondary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: We enrolled a consecutive cohort of 16,801 acutely admitted patients; all were included in the analyses. The intervention group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 8,900 patients, and the control group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 7,901 patients. The receiver operating characteristics curve analyses showed a prognostic ability of suPAR for 30-day and 10-month mortality corresponding to an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.81 to 0.84) and 0.80 (0.79 to 0.82), respectively.

After a median follow-up of 362 days, death had occurred in 1,241 patients (13.9%) in the intervention group and 1,126 patients (14.3%) in the control group.

The weighted Cox model found a hazard ratio of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.07; P=0.57). This result was consistent in all subgroups. Analysis of 30-day all-cause mortality showed similar results (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.16; P=0.84).

Conclusions: We detected no significant difference in mortality according to use of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor as a prognostic biomarker in the emergency department

 



Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02643459. Funding: ViroGates A/S
Martin SCHULTZ (Copenhagen, Denmark), Line Jee Hartmann RASMUSSEN, Birgitte Nybo JENSEN, Lisbet RAVN, Thomas KALLEMOSE, Theis LANGE, Lars KØBER, Lars Simon RASMUSSEN, Jesper EUGEN-OLSEN, Kasper Karmark IVERSEN
13:00 - 14:30 #15857 - FP008 Early discharge from the emergency department based on soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels: a substudy of the triage iii trial.
FP008 Early discharge from the emergency department based on soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels: a substudy of the triage iii trial.

ABSTRACT

Background: Early and accurate identification of patients at low risk of serious illness may improve flow in the emergency department (ED) by classifying these patients as non-urgent or even suitable for discharge. This would allow for better utilisation of limited staff and resources and could potentially translate into improved patient outcomes. Blood-based prognostic biomarkers measured at admittance can be used for this purpose. One of these biomarkers is the nonspecific soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). In this substudy of the TRIAGE III trial, we hypothesised availability of suPAR might lead to a higher frequency of early discharges from the ED.

Methods: In this post hoc substudy, we used data on the same consecutively included and unselected population as in the TRIAGE III trial, which was a randomised interventional trial investigating the introduction of suPAR as a routine biomarker in the ED. As early discharge based on suPAR would require the availability of the suPAR level, we compared patients with a valid suPAR measurement at admission to those without, regardless of whether patients arrived in interventional- or control periods. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged alive from the ED within 24 hours. In addition, we compared length of hospital stay and the number of readmissions within 30 days.

Results: We included 26,653 acute admissions of 16,801 unique patients. The suPAR level was available at the index admission in 7,905 patients (suPAR group), and no value was available in 8,896 (control group). The proportion of patients who were discharged within 24 hours of admittance was significantly higher in the suPAR group compared to the control group: 50.2% (3,966 patients) vs. 48.6% (4,317 patients), P=0.04). Furthermore, the mean length of hospital stay in the suPAR group was significantly shorter during the index admission compared to the control group (4.3 days (SD 7.4) vs. 4.6 days (SD 9.4), P=0.04). In contrast, readmission rate within 30 days was significantly higher in the suPAR group: 10.6% (839 patients) vs. 8.8% (785 patients), P<0.001. However, there was no difference in mortality (1.3% vs. 1.8%, P=0.09) or readmission rate (8.5% vs. 7.7%, P=0.18) in patients discharged within 24 hours, for the suPAR group and control group respectively.

Conclusions: These post hoc analyses demonstrate that the availability of the prognostic biomarker suPAR was associated with a higher proportion of discharge within 24 hours, reduced length of stay, but more readmissions. There was no difference in mortality or readmission rate within 30 days in those discharged within 24 hours.



Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02643459. Funding: ViroGates A/S
Martin SCHULTZ (Copenhagen, Denmark), Line Jee Hartmann RASMUSSEN, Birgitte Nybo JENSEN, Lisbet RAVN, Thomas KALLEMOSE, Theis LANGE, Lars KØBER, Lars Simon RASMUSSEN, Jesper EUGEN-OLSEN, Kasper Karmark IVERSEN
13:00 - 14:30 #15990 - FP009 Value of Vascular endothelial growth factor A in the detection of the Chronic Kidney Desease?
FP009 Value of Vascular endothelial growth factor A in the detection of the Chronic Kidney Desease?

Background : We aimed to assess the potential association between vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)  and early stage chronic kidney desease (ESCKD).

Methods : In a cross-sectional study  we included 81 patients with ESCKD with estimated glomerular rate filtration (eGRF ) >30 ml/min/1.73m2, divided into two groups : G1 patients with eGRF2 (G1, n=49) and G2 patients with eGRF≥90ml/min/1.73m2 (G2, n=32).Estimated glomurular filtration was calculated with  CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation (2009).In all patients we collected demographic and clinical data as well as VEGF-A serum levels   measured by ELISA commercial kits.

Result : The mean of eGRF in G1 was 78 ml/min/1.73m2 (IQR,70-85 ml/min/1.73m2 ) and in G2 was 103.6 ml/min/1.73m2 (IQR,95-108 ml/min/1.73m2 ) so there was a signifiant difference between the two groups with p≤10-3  .There was a signifiant difference in both groups  in the serum VEGF-A (183.7 pg/ml versus 278.7 pg/ml respectively for G1 and G2 ;p=0,02) .

Conclusion : In this study we  showed  that ESCKD  is  associatiated with lower serum levels of  VEGF-A .Our findings indicated that VEGF-A can help to ESCKD  detection. 


Feten LAMTI, Khaoula BEL HAJ ALI (Monastir, Tunisia), Sabra ALOUI, Mohamed Habib GRISSA, Adel SEKMA, Nasri BEZOUICH, Nizar FREDJ, Salima FERCHICHI, Abdelhedi MILED, Semir NOUIRA

14:30 - 15:00 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
15:00
15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A12
RESUSCITATION
Cardiac Arrest

RESUSCITATION
Cardiac Arrest

Moderators: Wilhelm BEHRINGER (Chair) (Vienna, Austria), Daniel HORNER (Manchester, United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
15:00 - 16:30 Identifying Patients at Risk for Prehospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest at the Early Phase of Myocardial Infarction. Yves LAMBERT (Chef de Service) (Speaker, Versailles, France)
15:00 - 16:30 Instant teams for cardiac arrest. Tom EVENS (Consultant) (Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
15:00 - 16:30 World Restart a Heart. Andrew LOCKEY (Speaker, Halifax, United Kingdom)

15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B12
ANALGESIA / SEDATION
Whats new in Analgesia & Sedation

ANALGESIA / SEDATION
Whats new in Analgesia & Sedation

Moderators: Vimal KRISHNAN (SPEAKER & MODERATOR) (THRISSUR, INDIA, India), Donogh MAGUIRE (Glasgow, United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
15:00 - 16:30 Locoregional anesthesia in ED. Agnès RICARD-HIBON (Medical Chief) (Speaker, Pontoise, France)
15:00 - 16:30 Pain management in the ED. Carlos GARCIA ROSAS (Speaker, MEXICO, Mexico)
15:00 - 16:30 Upping the game: TCI in ED. Fiona BURTON (Speaker, United Kingdom)

15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D12
Never forget THAT
We all know that special situation - but do we always do the right thing? - YEMD Session

Never forget THAT
We all know that special situation - but do we always do the right thing? - YEMD Session

Moderators: Delia NEBUNU (Resident) (Bucharest, Romania), Dr Pieter Jan VAN ASBROECK (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Genk, Belgium)
15:00 - 16:30 Bouncebacks - the good, the bad and the ugly. Lucas CHARTIER (Deputy Medical Director) (Speaker, Toronto, Canada)
15:00 - 16:30 Why does she keep coming back? Domestic violence & the ED. Wilma BERGSTRÖM (medical student, ER nurse) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)
15:00 - 16:30 Saved at second sight. Tom MALYSCH (Speaker, Werder (Havel), Germany)
15:00 - 16:30 Accepting the mistake. Rok PETROVCIC (Resident) (Speaker, Maribor, Slovenia)

15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E12
WHAT IF
What would happen if we delivered EM differently?

WHAT IF
What would happen if we delivered EM differently?

Moderators: Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Leeds), Dr Barbara C HOGAN (Past President of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, EuSEM) (HAMBURG, Germany)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
15:00 - 16:30 What if primary care physicians undertake Triage in ED´s? Dr John HEYWORTH (Consultant) (Speaker, Southampton)
15:00 - 16:30 What if access to the ED is only possible after a prior authorization from a telephone call center? Jan STROOBANTS (Head of the Emergency Department) (Speaker, Brecht, Belgium)
15:00 - 16:30 What if there were no 4 hour target in the UK? Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Speaker, Leeds)

15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C12
TOXICOLOGY

TOXICOLOGY

Moderators: Kurt ANSEEUW (Medical doctor) (Antwerp, Belgium), Pr Bruno MEGARBANE (Professor, head of the department) (Paris, France)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
15:00 - 16:30 Drug-induced hyperthermia: Actions by the emergency physician. Philippe HANTSON (Speaker, BRUXELLES, Belgium)
15:00 - 16:30 What every emergency physician should know about extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. Philippe HANTSON (Speaker, BRUXELLES, Belgium), Kurt ANSEEUW (Medical doctor) (Speaker, Antwerp, Belgium), Pr Bruno MEGARBANE (Professor, head of the department) (Speaker, Paris, France)
15:00 - 16:30 Expect the unexpected: Chemical warfare in the ED. Kurt ANSEEUW (Medical doctor) (Speaker, Antwerp, Belgium)

15:00-16:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F12
FREE PAPER 2
Administration & Healthcare Policy / Airway / Misc

FREE PAPER 2
Administration & Healthcare Policy / Airway / Misc

Moderators: Annmarie LASSEN (Professor in Emergency medicine) (Odense, Denmark), Dr Charles REYNARD (Emergency Medicine) (Manchester)
15:00 - 16:30 #14750 - FP010 Interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in the emergency department: a critical literature review.
FP010 Interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in the emergency department: a critical literature review.

BACKGROUND

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), defined as physical symptoms for which no organic pathology can be found, are a common presentation in the emergency department. It has been estimated that up to 45% of ‘moderate frequent attenders’ (5-10 ED visits per year) are patients with MUS, making up 4% of all ED attendances annually. The standard management of these patients following extensive investigation to rule out organic pathology involves reassurance or simple explanations of their symptoms, for example in relation to stress. A significant body of research examines interventions for such patients within a primary care setting, finding moderate benefits for some psychological treatments. However, much of this research is not transferrable to the ED where doctors are under time constraints and extended treatment courses lasting weeks to months are not feasible. We conducted a literature review to determine if there was any intervention that could be offered to these patients within an ED setting to reduce their re-attendances and improve their symptoms.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases from their earliest limits until March 2018 using terms such as “unexplain*”, “somatoform” and “functional”, as well as terms for more specific syndromes such as “non-cardiac” to capture the ill-defined concept of MUS. Studies were included if they considered adult MUS within an ED setting, and used any specific intervention whilst measuring rates of attendance or symptom severity. We also only included studies designed as RCTs or pre-post intervention studies. Studies were excluded if they considered frequent attenders who had biological disease.

RESULTS

The search identified 1612 unique citations. Titles and abstracts were screened resulting in 32 articles for full text retrieval and finally 6 articles were selected for data extraction. 3 of the 6 articles were published only as conference abstracts. As a whole, the studies were heterogeneous in terms of the participants involved, interventions tested, and conclusions drawn. Three studies tested CBT, ranging from a single 60-minute session at the bedside to 4 sessions over several days, in patients with MUS or non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) with two finding a reduction in ED attendance and the third showing no change. Other interventions tested included phone-based coaching for self-management of NCCP, intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy for MUS, and confirming a diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures using inpatient video and EEG telemetry to reassure and educate patients.

DISCUSSION

Despite the fact that patients with MUS represent a large proportion of attendances and healthcare costs for EDs, the evidence concerning interventions for patients with MUS is limited and of a variable quality. It seems CBT could be a promising treatment option for this patient group, a result in keeping with the findings from general practice, yet it remains unclear whether short, intensive treatment is efficacious. Further research is required to determine the best intervention for this challenging patient group.

 


George LENNOX (Cambridge, United Kingdom), Richard KENDALL
15:00 - 16:30 #14797 - FP011 Comparison of PENTAX-AWS™ and McGRATH MAC™ for emergency tracheal intubation by pre-hospital emergency care providers in copious vomiting scenario – A randomized crossover manikin trial.
FP011 Comparison of PENTAX-AWS™ and McGRATH MAC™ for emergency tracheal intubation by pre-hospital emergency care providers in copious vomiting scenario – A randomized crossover manikin trial.

Background: Difficult and failed tracheal intubation (TI) procedures occur more frequently in emergency settings than an operating room environment. Notably, glottis identification is difficult with copious salivation, vomiting, or bleeding in the oral cavity, complicating TI. Video-laryngoscopes such as the PENTAX-AWS (AWS, NIHON KOHDEN), with a tube-guiding groove in an L-shaped blade, and McGRATH MAC (McG, Covidien), with a Macintosh-shaped blade, have been developed to facilitate TI under various conditions, including emergency settings. However, the AWS provides only indirect viewing, while a direct view of the glottis as well as indirect viewing via a monitor are possible with the McG, making it advantageous for glottis identification in cases with vomiting. We examined success rate, intubation time, and difficulty with those devices used for simulated TI with oral cavity vomiting.

Methods: This was a randomized crossover manikin study. Twenty-five TI certified ambulance crews were enrolled after each member provided written consent. Using a manikin with a clumped bronchus and esophagus, vomiting was simulated by pouring rice gruel into the oral cavity, then laryngoscopy procedures were performed. With the AWS, suctioning was done with an 18-Fr suction catheter inserted via the tracheal tube (TT) set into the tube-guiding groove of the blade, with subsequent TT advancement. With the McG, conventional suctioning using the same size catheter and subsequent TT advancement were performed. Intubation attempts were randomly performed with each device by the crews. Success rates as well as time required from device insertion to glottis visualization (T1), glottis visualization to tube passage through the vocal cords (T2), and tube passage through the vocal cords to ventilation (T3) were noted. The crews scored each TI attempt for difficulty using a visual analog scale (0-100 mm, very easy to very difficult). Values are shown as the mean ± SD, with Fisher’s exact test or Student's t-test used for analysis.

Results: Success rates with the AWS and McG were 100% and 96%, respectively (not significant). There was no significant difference between the AWS and McG for T1 (33±15 vs. 35±25 seconds), while T2 and T3 with the AWS were significantly shorter (9±9 vs. 20±20, 9±2 vs. 13±6 seconds, respectively). Overall time for TI with the AWS was also significantly shorter (51±17 vs. 69±36 seconds), whereas difficulty was not significantly different between the devices (33±24 vs. 37±25 mm).

Discussion & Conclusion: The AWS required less time to complete intubation as compared to the McG, while time to glottis visualization, difficulty, and success rate were similar. The AWS is equipped with a blade molded to fit the oropharyngeal anatomy, enabling even less experienced operators to obtain an optimal view for TI without requiring airway axis alignment. Furthermore, suctioning with the catheter inserted via the TT set into the tube-guiding groove of the AWS enables focused decontamination around the glottis. These features may explain the main differences between the devices in this study. In conclusion, using a simulated vomiting scenario, more prompt TI was achieved with the AWS as compared to the McG video-laryngoscope. 



Trial registration: This study was not registered as a trial because there were no patients involved. Funding: No specific funding was received in regard to this study.
Kei SUZUKI (Hiroshima, Japan), Shinji KUSUNOKI, Takuma SADAMORI, Yuko TANABE, Junji ITAI, Nobuaki SHIME
15:00 - 16:30 #15044 - FP012 A comparison of direct versus video laryngoscopy for difficult airway patients in the emergency department: a National Emergency Airway Registry study.
FP012 A comparison of direct versus video laryngoscopy for difficult airway patients in the emergency department: a National Emergency Airway Registry study.

Study objective: The goal of this study was to compare first-pass success rates in patients undergoing emergency intubation with direct laryngoscopy (DL) vs video laryngoscopy (VL).  We also compared success rates in pediatric vs adult patients and trauma vs medical indications with sub-analyses for the major indications in each category.  We hypothesized that VL would be superior to DL during endotracheal intubation in emergency departments (EDs).

 

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data entered into the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) during a 12 month period. Twenty-two academic EDs in the United States recorded intubation data onto a web-based data collection tool. After each intubation, the operator completed a standardized data form evaluating multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient characteristics, indication for intubation, device(s) and medication(s) used, difficult airway characteristics, number of attempts, and outcome of each attempt. The primary outcome was first-pass success.

 

Results: Twenty two centers participating in NEAR met the 90% compliance standards.  We report on 5071 emergency intubations during 2016 (additional data for 2017 will be available soon).   A total of 338 (6.7%) intubations were performed on pediatric patients (age <15) with a first pass attempt by DL (n = 179, 52.9%) vs VL (n = 152, 45.9%).  The remainder of the intubations, 4733 (93.3%) were performed on adult patients with DL as the preferred initial device (n=1796, 37.9%) vs VL (n=2915, 61.8%). Nearly 75% of intubations (3697 out of 5071) were for medical indications with 39.9% (1474) performed using DL and 60.1% (2218) performed using VL.   For trauma indications (1339 pts), 37.4% (501) of intubations were performed using DL vs 62.6% (838) by VL.  For first pass success, VL appeared superior to DL for both medical and traumatic indications except for burn/inhalation injury where using DL resulted in better first pass success (92.3% vs 86.5%).  The largest differences in DL vs VL first-pass success rates were seen for the following medical indications: overdose (80% vs 92.2%), seizure (80.5% vs 92.7%), septic shock (79% vs 92%) and cardiac arrest (76.5% vs 85.8%). Among trauma indications the largest differences were seen for head injury without ICH (68.6% vs 92.5%), polytrauma (73.3% vs 84.3%), chest trauma (82.1% vs 91.5%), and traumatic arrest (77.6% vs 83.6%).

 

Conclusion: VL has a higher first-pass success rate compared to DL when used for emergent intubation for both trauma and medical indications in this large, multi-center airway registry database involving academic institutions.  These findings are not concordant with other studies that have found equivalence between DL and VL and occasionally superior performance with DL. There are many possible explanations for this, but it is clear there has been a movement toward the use of VL over DL in academic institutions. This will have a large and important impact on current and future airway training and will hopefully lead to the increased availability of VL in the community setting.


Martina MALI, Radosveta WELLS (El Paso, USA), Susan WATTS, Robert KILGO, Scott CRAWFORD, Joseph BORAWSKI, Brandon RUDERMAN
15:00 - 16:30 #15203 - FP013 Prevalence, follow-up and risk factors of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans, a cross-sectional study at an urban level one trauma center.
FP013 Prevalence, follow-up and risk factors of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans, a cross-sectional study at an urban level one trauma center.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is increasing used to evaluate trauma patients and substantial numbers of incidental finding (IF) have been reported. Although these IF are often benign, their presence must always be communicated to patients. Clinically relevant IF needs referral or even consultation. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of IF revealed by trauma CT and status of communication. We also evaluate patient characteristics associated with the presence of IF.

 

Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study. We collected all patients who received CT scans for trauma evaluation at our Emergency Department in 2016. Duplicated scans and patients with missing data were excluded. Official CT reports were examined and basic demographics were reviewed. Scans with IF prompted detailed review of medical records to determine the clinical significance and the follow-up. Incidental findings were divided in 3 categories: category I (potentially severe condition, in-time diagnostic workup and management are required), category II (not urgent, needs follow-up), and category III (of minor concern, required no specific follow-up). Prevalence and status of follow-up of IF were reported. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine whether certain patient characteristics were associated with the presence of IF. A P value less than .05 is considered statistically significant.

 

Results: There were 4,173 CT scans performed for trauma evaluation. After excluding 20 duplicated scans and 61 scans with missing data, 4,092 scans were enrolled. Incidental findings were identified in 649 (15.9%) scans; 13 (2.0%) of them were category I, 306 (47.1%) were category II, and 330 (50.8%) were category III. Patients with IF were older than those without (P < 0.001); however, no sex difference was found (P = 0.667). Near 2/3 (61.5%) scans were done for head; however, abdomen had the highest prevalence of IF (26.2%), followed by chest (20.2%), head (15.3%), neck (10.5%) and extremity (2.6%). Although 46% patients with category I IF received consultation of corresponding specialists, no documentation about IF could be found for the majority of patients with IF (category I 31%, category II 91.9%, category III 97.0%). Every year of Increasing age was independently associated with a higher prevalence of IF (Odds ratio, 1.019; 95% CI 1.015-1.024). A higher risk (Odds ratio, 1.035; 95% CI 1.028-1.041) of aging was observed in Category I & II IF.

 

Discussion & Conclusions: Incidental findings were identified in 15.9% of our trauma CT scanning. These lesions were common in the abdomen and chest and showed an increased prevalence with increasing age. Follow-up was poor, even for potentially serious findings. A delicate effort of communicating to the patient, referring to the primary care physician or corresponding specialist, and documentation is beneficial to both the patient and the healthcare provider.


Wei-An LAI (Chiayi, Taiwan), Pang-Hsu LIU, Ming-Jen TSAI, Pr Ying Chieh HUANG
15:00 - 16:30 #15240 - FP014 Emergency department intubation methods and their association with adverse events and first pass success: an analysis of over 5,000 intubations from the National Emergency Airway Registry.
FP014 Emergency department intubation methods and their association with adverse events and first pass success: an analysis of over 5,000 intubations from the National Emergency Airway Registry.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluate intubation methods and associations with adverse events (AEs) and first pass success in over 5,000 Emergency Department (ED) intubations.

METHODS: Academic EDs in the USA recorded 5,071 ED intubations at 22 Institutions in 2016 (25 institutions/7,500 intubations in 2017 are scheduled for release at the end of April 2018).  These intubations were collected prospectively through a web based tool (StudyTRAX) for the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR).  EDs had to have a 90% compliance rate to be included in the registry.  We discuss associations between intubation characteristics, AEs and first pass success.  The intubation characteristics are method used (Rapid Sequence Intubation{RSI}, sedation only or no medications), device used (video laryngoscopy{VL} vs direct laryngoscopy{DL}),  induction agent used (etomidate, ketamine, propofol), paralytic used (rocuronium, succinylcholine, vecuronium), and intubator (resident, faculty). Logistic regression analysis will be used to compare these variables with first pass success and AEs.

RESULTS: First pass success has remained at 85% since the 1990's.  VL has surpassed DL as the predominant mode of intubation in this study.  This change is associated with different AEs.  Earlier studies showed esophageal intubations were the predominate AE.  In this review of NEAR esophageal intubations accounted for less than 1% of the AEs.  The main AEs were hypoxia and hypotension comprising more than 90% AEs. AEs occurred in 13% of patients overall, of which hypoxia accounted for 7-8% and hypotension accounted for 4%.  The remainder of AEs for this study had a total of less than 1% occurrence rate.  No intubation characteristic came to predominate with any of the AEs.  An increased rate of AEs was found in medical patients (over trauma patients) and in patient with certain characteristics (body habitus and predicted difficult airway).  While the AE rate was similar with either VL or DL, the VL use resulted in a higher first pass success rate across the majority of intubations. In this data higher rate of hypoxia and hypotension were found with ketamine as induction agent.  Ketamine has become an agent of choice in patients with unstable haemodynamics.   This higher rate of AEs is likely due to a sicker subset of patients.  Although the infamous succinylcholine versus rocuronium debate has not been laid to rest, this data does not suggest that either agent has a statistically increased association with any of the AEs.  Certain AE rates were shown to be more prominent in the medical group (esophageal intubations), though numbers were very low (<1%).  

CONCLUSIONS: This data shows that while the device utilized (VL or DL) has changed, the rate of AEs is similar between the two groups despite an associated higher first pass success with VL.   When faced with a difficult intubation in the ED it is paramount that the intubation characteristics reviewed here are not the factors associated with AEs in the hands of trained ED providers.  These findings suggest areas of further study in order to improve patient oriented outcomes and allow the intubator to make informed decisions when intubating critically ill and injured patients.


Freddie FLO (El Paso, USA), Robert KILGO, Renet ROY, Radosveta WELLS, Susan WATTS, Lauren ABBATE
15:00 - 16:30 #15353 - FP015 Prospective observational study about efficiency of reduced core temperature and complications in the period of 72 hours after treatment from heat illness in military personnel.
FP015 Prospective observational study about efficiency of reduced core temperature and complications in the period of 72 hours after treatment from heat illness in military personnel.

Prospective observational study about efficiency of reduced core temperature and complications in the period of 72 hours after treatment from heat illness in military personnel.

Intharachat Suthee , Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Background: Heat related injuries including Exertional heat stroke (EHS) and heat exhaustion (HE) are life-threatening conditions with high mortality rate and permanent organ system dysfunction. Heat related injuries are among the health problems of military concern especially during personnel training and operation. Early recognition, immediate cooling and support of organ system function can reduce the fatality rate. 

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of rapid cooling of core body temperature (BT) to reach the goal of less than or equal to 38 degree Celsius in 30 minutes and assessed the factors related to the achievement of body cooling including length of stay in hospital, the organ dysfunction.

Methods: We conducted prospective cohort study among patients who was diagnosed with EHS or HE during May 2015 to July 2016.    

Result: Fifty-two participants were included into this study, 11 participants were diagnosed with EHS and 41 participants were diagnosed with HE. Among 52 participants with a mean (±SD) Body mass index of 25.49±4.6 at baseline (29.21±4.12 in EHS and 23.63±3.69 in HE). The mean age of the patients was 21.65 ±3.2 years. The core BT of the patients on arrival at the emergency departments were 41.08±0.76 degree Celsius and 39.73±0.7 degree Celsius among EHS and HE patients, respectively. The primary outcome of lowering core BT to less than or equal to 38 degree Celsius in 30 minutes after rapid cooling was observed in 50% of the total participants (26 of 52), in 58.5% of the participants (24 of 41) in the HE group and in 18.2% of the participants (2 of 11) in the EHS group. One fatality case was found. The cooling methods used in all participants included ice packing, tepid sponge, massage and 4 degree Celsius cool saline infusion to reduce core BT. We also found that 34.6% of the total participants (18 of 52) used cold water gastric lavage and 23.1% of the total participants (12 of 52) used cold water bladder irrigate to reduce core BT. The initial core BT at emergency department effect the efficacy of rapid cooling core BT (P < 0.001). We found that the patients who achieved the target core BT within 30 minutes had significantly good outcomes (shorten length of stay in ICU and hospital [P=0.019]). The complications after the diagnosis of EHS and HE included renal system (98%) i.e., electrolyte imbalance (hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia: 82.6%), metabolic acidosis and acute kidney injury. 

Conclusion: Approximately one fifth of the EHS cases achieved the target core BT. Rapid cooling down core BT caused better outcomes. Prehospital care was an important factor to reduce the core BT. More effective system to improve the cooling core BT among EHS patients in this population should be implemented. 

Keywords: Heat stroke, rapid cooling, Core body temperature, Military


Suthee INTHARACHAT (Thailand, Thailand)
15:00 - 16:30 #15475 - FP016 Tubing the right tube. A prospective study to assess the efficacy of use of point of care ultrasound in confirmation of endotracheal tube placement.
FP016 Tubing the right tube. A prospective study to assess the efficacy of use of point of care ultrasound in confirmation of endotracheal tube placement.

Background : Airway skills are crucial for emergency physicians. Verfication of endotracheal tube intubation location in critically ill patient is very important. Unrecognized esophageal intubations are associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. No single confirmatory device has been shown to be 100% accurate at ruling out oesophageal intubations in the emergency departments.Many methods are being used for verification of endotracheal tube location, none are ideal. Quantitative waveform capnography is considered the standard care for this purpose. This feasibility study is conducted to compare an alternative, bedside upper airway ultrasonography to waveform capnography, for verification of endotracheal tube location after intubation.

Methods: This is a prospective, single centre, observational study, conducted at a tertiary care centre between April 2015 to September 2015. It included 60 patients who were intubated for surgeries under general anaesthesia in the department of anaesthesia.

After induction of anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade, intubation via direct laryngoscopy was performed. This study required 2 performers. One performed the ultrasonography, and the other noted down the time taken by the different methods. Intubation was done by an anaesthesiologist and the emergency physician performed upper airway ultrasonography. During intubations, we placed a high- frequency, linear transducer transversely on the neck at the cricoid level and visualised the endotracheal tube in transverse view. After endotracheal tube placement was confirmed, time taken by each methods was noted down, i.e. dynamic airway, quantitative waveform capnography, lung sliding sign and auscultation.

On completion of this study, the result of bedside ultrasonography was compared with capnography and result of lung sliding scale with auscultation. Duration and accuracy of bedside ultrasonography examination were calculated to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of  its clinical use. Those values were considered to determine the strength of agreement between bedside ultrasonography along with lung sliding scale and waveform capnography and therefore be used as the standard of care.

Result: 

Dynamic airway was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Capnography showed a sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 92%. Lung sliding sign was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Auscultation also revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% each. Mean time taken for confirmation of intubation was the least with dynamic airway, followed by capnography, lung sliding sign and lastly, auscultation. An improvement in the time taken by dynamic airway and lung sliding test, both showing a progressive downward trend was observed. The time taken by capnography and auscultation did not show any steady increase or decrease with due course of the study. A statistically significant difference was noted in time taken for detection by the methods of dynamic airway and auscultation. Dynamic airway detected esophageal intubation before other methods.

Conclusion:

This study indicates that the use of bedside upper airway ultrasonography is useful for primary verification of endotracheal tube location. It is feasible, easy, safe and rapidly done.Dynamic airway is one of the fastest techniques to detect accurate endotracheal intubation and avoid esophageal intubation.


Dr Jyoti TAMORE (Mumbai, India), Deepali RAJPAL
15:00 - 16:30 #15485 - FP017 Association between Boarding in the Emergency Department and Mortality - A Systematic Review.
FP017 Association between Boarding in the Emergency Department and Mortality - A Systematic Review.

Background/Objectives: Boarding of patients requiring hospital admission after emergency department (ED) care is the main cause of ED crowding. ED boarding delays care, increases the risk of patient safety events and increases patient dissatisfaction. The impact of the ED boarding on patient mortality remains unclear. Several studies showed that ED boarding was associated with higher mortality up to 30 days after the ED visit. However, a recent study where statistical analysis adjusted the data with patient characteristics did not confirm this association.1 Our main objective will be to systematically review the literature for evidence on the association between ED boarding and mortality. We hypothesize that patient boarding in the ED increases mortality. Our secondary aim will be to identify an association between ED LOS and mortality, and between ED crowding and mortality.

Methods: Articles selected were focus on the association between boarding and in-hospital mortality (IHM). Literature search strategies used MeSH and text words related to EDLOS. Search was performed on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycNET. The selection of articles was done with F1000 software. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts yielded by the search to identify relevant abstracts. Full articles with title or abstract meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and the reviewers selected those that meet inclusion criteria. Data extraction included study characteristics, prognostic factors, outcomes, and IHM.

Results: From 3,577 references screened by the two independent reviewers 135 references were selected. After the first step of exclusion of references that didn’t match with the search, 68 papers were selected. Finally, after a last round of screening the reviewers selected 10 papers. The total number of patients included was 126,243. While Hsieh et al, Cha et al, Singer et al, and Chalfin el al found prolonged boarding to be associated with increased inhospital mortality, McCoy et al, Al-Khathammi et al, and Gilligan et al found no association with inhospital mortality. Junhasavsdi et al found prolonged boarding to be associated with decreased inhospital mortality. Huang el al’s results showed significant increase in mortality with increased time to admission, but did not analyze the results for mortality.

Conclusions: The association between in-hospital mortality and ED boarding was not clear in our systematic review. While some studies showed an increase in in-hospital mortality with ED boarding, other studies concluded no mortality differences or even a decrease in in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed.


Gregory YU (Washington, DC, USA), Mohammed ALSABRI, Dominique LAUQUE, Shamai GROSSMAN, Carlos LOJO-RIAL, Marius SMARANDOIU, Abdelouahab BELLOU
15:00 - 16:30 #15763 - FP018 Re-Admıssıons To Emergency Department.
FP018 Re-Admıssıons To Emergency Department.

Aim:
Emergency service admittions are increasing every year in our country.Health care services are not able to apply for emergency services within working hours due to the large number of working population. Patients who are not relieved of their complaints are referred to the same emergency or other emergency services. In this study, the rates of patients re-admitted for emergency services were examined.


Methods:
In this study, patients who were re-admitted within 24 hours of Emergency Medicine department between 01.01.2017 and 31.12.2017 were enrolled retrospectively. Patient complaints were recorded. Patients with a consultation case were enrolled in case of first admission. Re-admission times have been recorded.


Results:
There was a total of 100 patients re-visiting the emergency service within 24 hours between 01.01.2017 and 31.12.2017. In the case of recurrent complaints, the diagnosis was 60% fatigue fever and nonspesific pain. 49% of the patients were female and 51% were male. 19% of the patients admitted again in the first quarter of the year, 24% in the second quarter, 17% in the third quarter and 40% in the fourth quarter. 82% of the patients who re-admitted in the first quarter admitted out of working hours. 19,05% of these patients had an internal medicine referral for their first visit and 14,29% for consultation with chest diseases. 47% of the patients admitted between 16:00-24:00 hours. In the second quarter, 54.55% of the patients re-admitted out of the working hours. 13,73% of patients had internal medicine and 11,76% had consultations on chest diseases at the first visit. 50% of the patients reappeared between 08: 00-16: 00. In the third quarter, 56% of the patients re-admitted during the working hours. On the first admission, 30% of the patients had internal medicine consultation. In the fourth quarter, 52% of the patients recruited during working hours. In the first visit, 9,09% internal medicine patients and 9.05% neurology consultation were present. 62.5% of the patients applied between 08:00 AM-16:00 PM .


Conclusion: 
When the data of the emergency department re-admission patients were examined in detail, it was seen that especially the patients with green area constituted the majority. Although it is one of the largest hospitals in the region, informing patients about symptoms that may occur in patients with symptomatic complaints, even with a low percentage of re-admission, will reduce re-admission rates.


Mehmet GUL, Hakan GÜNER (Konya, Turkey), Başar CANDER, Halil İbrahim KAÇAR, Leyla OZTURK SONMEZ, Ahmet Tufan SIVIŞ

16:40
16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A13
SEPSIS

SEPSIS
Hot Topic inside!

Moderators: Christoph DODT (Head of the Department) (München, Germany), Annmarie LASSEN (Professor in Emergency medicine) (Odense, Denmark)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
16:40 - 18:10 Sepsis vs. viral infection - how to diagnose one and the other at the beginning. Annmarie LASSEN (Professor in Emergency medicine) (Speaker, Odense, Denmark)
16:40 - 18:10 Treatment of Sepsis - is there a new resuscitation bundle? Christoph DODT (Head of the Department) (Speaker, München, Germany)
16:40 - 18:10 HOT TOPIC: Antibiotics in Sepsis - what to use in the early stage in the ED. Pr Christian BACKER-MOGENSEN (Professor) (Speaker, Aabenraa, Denmark)

16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B13
RESUSCITATION
Thromboembolism

RESUSCITATION
Thromboembolism

Moderators: Wilhelm BEHRINGER (Chair) (Vienna, Austria), Matthew REED (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Edinburgh)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
16:40 - 18:10 Diagnosis of massive PE. Daniel HORNER (Speaker, Manchester, United Kingdom)
16:40 - 18:10 Treatment of PE. Franck VERSCHUREN (MD, PhD) (Speaker, Brussels, Belgium)
16:40 - 18:10 POCUS during and after resuscitation – a MUST? Pr Joseph OSTERWALDER (Head of Hospital) (Speaker, St. Gallen, Switzerland)

16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D13
The old and the young
Geriatric insights for young doctors - YEMD Session

The old and the young
Geriatric insights for young doctors - YEMD Session

Moderators: Wilma BERGSTRÖM (medical student, ER nurse) (Berlin, Germany), Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Haarlem, The Netherlands)
16:40 - 18:10 Geriatric Scenarios. Zerrin Defne DÜNDAR (Professor) (Speaker, Konya, Turkey)
16:40 - 18:10 Abdominal Pain in the Elderly. Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN (Chair of EuSEM Research Committee) (Speaker, ANKARA, Turkey)
16:40 - 18:10 Pearls and pitfalls when treating older patients. Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy)

16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E13
NEW TECHNOLOGIES

NEW TECHNOLOGIES

Moderators: Pr Abdelouahab BELLOU (Director of Institute) (Guangzhou, China), Luis GARCIA-CASTRILLO (ED director) (ORUNA, Spain)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
16:40 - 18:10 The transformative power of digital health in the emergency department. Catherine CHRONAKI (Secretary General) (Speaker, Brussels, Belgium)
16:40 - 18:10 The generic applicability of the modelling based approach. Tiziana MARGARIA STEFFEN (Speaker, Ireland)
16:40 - 18:10 Standards and assessment of health care technology. Magnus STRIDSMANN (Head of Unit) (Speaker, Linköping, Sweden)

16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C13
TRIAGE
How to make triage work

TRIAGE
How to make triage work

Moderators: Laura HOWARD (United Kingdom), Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Paris, France)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
16:40 - 18:10 What is successful triage? Henriette MOLL (paediatrician) (Speaker, rotterdam, The Netherlands)
16:40 - 18:10 Major incident triage: sorting the apples from the pears. James VASSALLO (EM Trainee) (Speaker, Bristol)
16:40 - 18:10 What's new about triage? Ana NAVIO (Speaker, Spain)

16:40-18:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F13
FREE PAPER 3
Cardiovascular / Disaster Medicine

FREE PAPER 3
Cardiovascular / Disaster Medicine

Moderators: Carlos GARCIA ROSAS (MEXICO, Mexico), Dr John HEYWORTH (Consultant) (Southampton)
16:40 - 18:10 #14534 - FP019 Immediate ‘rule out’ of Acute Coronary Syndromes in emergency department: derivation and external validation of The History and Electrocardiogram only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (HE-MACS) decision aid.
FP019 Immediate ‘rule out’ of Acute Coronary Syndromes in emergency department: derivation and external validation of The History and Electrocardiogram only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (HE-MACS) decision aid.

 

Introduction

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) will usually undergo further investigation for at least 3-6 hours to detect any changes in cardiac biomarkers before AMI can be ‘ruled out’ confidently and the patient discharged. Several decision aids can now enable ACS to be rapidly ‘ruled in’ and ‘ruled out’ but all require measurement of blood biomarkers.

A decision aid that does not rely on blood biomarkers could enhance risk stratification at triage and could enable more effective decisions to be made in the pre-hospital environment. We aimed to derive and externally validate the History & Electrocardiogram only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (HE-MACS) decision aid to ‘rule in’ and ‘rule out’ ACS using only the patient’s history, physical examination and electrocardiogram (ECG).

 

Methods

We undertook secondary analyses in three prospective observational diagnostic accuracy studies. We included patients presenting to a total of 3 EDs with suspected cardiac chest pain within 12h of onset. Clinicians recorded clinical features at the time of arrival using a bespoke form. Patients underwent serial troponin sampling and 30-day follow up for the primary outcome of ACS, defined as prevalent or incident acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality or coronary revascularization. The model was derived by logistic regression in one cohort and validated in two similar prospective studies. The derivation cohort was powered to derive a rule with 15 predictors, assuming 20% prevalence of ACS with 5% loss to follow up, requiring 790 participants.

 

Results

HE-MACS was derived in 796 patients, of which 179 (22.5%) had ACS. It was validated in cohorts of 474 and 659 patients, of which 80 (16.9%) and 93 (19.6%) had ACS respectively. HE-MACS incorporated age, sex, systolic blood pressure plus five historical variables (sweating, ECG ischaemia, pain radiation, vomiting, smoking status) to stratify patients into four risk groups: immediate ‘rule out’, ‘low risk’, ‘moderate risk’ and ‘high risk’ ACS. The model ‘ruled out’ ACS in a pooled total of 9.4% patients with sensitivities of 100.0% (95% CI 96.1-100.0%) and 98.9% (94.2-100.0%) in the two respective validation studies, giving a pooled sensitivity of 99.5% (97.1-100.0%). In the ‘high risk’ group the prevalence of ACS was 50.0% and 60.0% in the two respective validation studies.

 

Conclusion

Using only the patient’s history and ECG, HE-MACS could ‘rule out’ ACS in 9.4% patients while effectively risk stratifying remaining patients. This is a very promising tool for triage in both the pre-hospital environment and ED. Its impact should be prospectively evaluated in those settings. 



(UK CRN 8376 & UK CRN 18000) The Validation of the Early Vascular Markers of Acute Coronary Syndromes study was funded by a research grant from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (2010), and was sponsored by Stockport NHS Foundation Trust The Bedside Evaluation of Sensitive Troponin (BEST) study received funding from Abbott Point of Care, European Union Horizons-2020 (via FABPulous BV) and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, and was sponsored by Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Abdulrhman ALGHAMDI (Manchester, United Kingdom), Laura HOWARD, Charles REYNARD, Philip MOSS, Heather JARMAN, Kevin MACKWAY-JONES, Simon CARLEY, Richard BODY
16:40 - 18:10 #14903 - FP020 Observational Study of Accordance of Infarct Localization between 12-Lead Electrocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.
FP020 Observational Study of Accordance of Infarct Localization between 12-Lead Electrocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Abstract

Objective           To establish the assignment of 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) for localization of myocardial infarction validated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Background       The standard assignment of 12-lead ECG to specific myocardial segment is largely based on clinical experience.

Methods            A total of 349 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent CMR after primary percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. ST-elevation of

                        each 12 leads was compared with the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) using 17 left ventricular myocardial segment model.

Results             LGE was found in 6±3 segments per patient, and in 2,109 (36%) among a total of 5,933 myocardial segments. In overall, 1 out of every 5 myocardial segments with LGE did not match

                       with empirically assigned ECG lead (N=423, 20%). In per lead analysis, there was no myocardial segment 100% matching to a specific ECG lead. Leads I, aVR, and aVL corresponded

                       not only to LGE in lateral but also to LGE in anterior myocardial segments. A newly modified assignment of 12 ECG lead to 17 myocardial segment was developed.

                       It could additionally match a total of 212 myocardial segments (10%) to ECG leads, and increase the rate of matching between 12 ECG lead and 17 myocardial segments from 80% to 90%.

Conclusion        ST-elevation in leads I, aVR, and aVL corresponded both anterior and lateral wall myocardial infarction. A newly proposed ECG assignment could reclassify correctly the location of

                       myocardial infarction in 1 out of 10 myocardial segments. Our result suggests that the current standard assignment of 12-lead ECG for infarction localization may require reappraisal.


Seok Goo KIM (Seoul, Republic of Korea), Jin-Ho CHOI, Sung Yeon HWANG, Joo Hyun PARK, Tae Gun SHIN, Min Seob SIM, Ik Joon JO, Hee YOON, Won Chul CHA, Keun Jeong SONG, Joong Eui RHEE, Yeon Kwon JEONG
16:40 - 18:10 #15173 - FP021 The usefulness of the MEESSI score for risk stratification of patients with acute heart failure at the emergency department: validation in a new Spanish cohort.
FP021 The usefulness of the MEESSI score for risk stratification of patients with acute heart failure at the emergency department: validation in a new Spanish cohort.

Aims: The MEESSI (Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with acute heart failure –AHF-) scale is a new tool to stratify AHF patients at the emergency department (ED) according to the 30-day mortality risk. We aimed to validate the MEESSI risk score in a new cohort of Spanish patients to assess its accuracy in stratifying patients by risk and to compare its performance in different settings.

Methods: We included consecutive patients diagnosed with AHF in 30 EDs during January and February 2016 (60 fays). The MEESSI score was calculated for each patient. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC ROC) measured the discriminatory capacity to predict 30-day mortality of the MEESSI full model (13 variables) and the 7 secondary models (lacking the Barthel Index, troponin or NT-ProBNP, in any combination). Further comparisons were made between subgroups of patients from university and community hospitals, EDs with high, medium or low activity and EDs that recruited or not patients in the original MEESSI derivation cohort.

Results: We analyzed 4711 patients (university/community hospitals: 3811/900; high-/medium-/low-activity EDs: 2695/1479/537; EDs participating/not participating in the previous MEESSI derivation study: 3892/819). The distribution of patients according to the MEESSI risk categories was: 1673 (35.5%) low-risk, 2023 (42.9%) intermediate-risk, 530 (11.3%) high-risk and 485 (10.3%) very high-risk, with 30-day mortality of 2.0%, 7.8%, 17.9% and 41.4%, respectively. The AUC ROC for the full model was 0.810 (95% CI: 0.790-0.830), and ranged from 0.731 to 0.785 for the subsequent secondary models. The discriminatory capacity of the MEESSI risk score was similar among subgroups of hospital type, ED activity, and original recruiter EDs.

Conclusion: The MEESSI risk score successfully stratifies AHF patients at the ED according to the 30-day mortality risk, potentially helping clinicians in the decision-making process for hospitalizing patients.


Òscar MIRÓ (Barcelone, Spain), Xavier ROSSELLÓ, Víctor GIL, Pere LLORENS, Pablo HERRERO-PUENTE, F. Javier MARTÍN-SÁNCHEZ
16:40 - 18:10 #15328 - FP022 Prognostic value of the sum of st-segment depression in patients with non-st segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
FP022 Prognostic value of the sum of st-segment depression in patients with non-st segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Introduction: The electrocardiogram (ECG) remains central in the risk stratification of non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The ST segment depression appears to be the most predictive marker of mortality at day 30 and at one year. Recently, many studies had demonstrated that the sum of ST-segment depression provides much more information than the simple qualitative assessment of ST-segment depression>0.5 mm.
Objective: To study the prognostic value of the sum of ST-segment depression in all ECG leads in the prediction of the mortality at six months in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over five years. Patients were eligible for inclusion if the diagnosis of NSTEMI was made (based on anamnestic, clinical, electrocardiographic and biological criteria). The demographics, co-morbidities, clinical and biological data and in-hospital procedures were collected. We calculated the cumulative sum of the ST-segment depression, in millimetres (mm), in all leads showing ST-segment depression >0.5 mm in the standard 12-lead ECG recorded on admission. The prognosis was based on the evaluation of mortality at six months. The ROC curve was used to determine the cut-off of the sum of ST-segment depression to predict the mortality at six months.
Results: Inclusion of 510 patients. Mean age was 62±11. Sex ratio= 1.72. Comorbidities (%): hypertension (58), Diabetes (44), dyslipidemia (31), coronary artery disease (28). An ST-segment depression was found in 276 patients (54%). The median of sum of ST segment depression was 3 [2,6]. Mortality was 11%. The mean sum of ST segment depression was higher in the non survivors patients comparing to the survivors: 7.15±5.94 vs.3.90 ±3.67 respectively, p <0.001. The sum of ST segment depression was predictive of six months mortality with a cut-off at 7 mm with an area under the curve at 0.67, 95% CI [0.55 to 0.78], p=0.003. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value are 46, 83, 29, 91% respectively. Liklehood ratio (LR) += 2.7.
Conclusion: In patients with NSTEMI, the sum of ST-segment depression in all ECG leads is a powerful predictor of mortality at six months. It should be considered in future multivariate analyses of the incremental prognostic value of novel biomarkers.


Marwa MABROUK, Hanen GHAZALI, Mouna GAMMOUDI, Ines CHERMITI (Ben Arous, Tunisia), Aymen ZOUBLI, Mahbouba CHKIR, Sawsen CHIBOUB, Sami SOUISSI
16:40 - 18:10 #15597 - FP023 Detection of arterial calcification by computer tomography in patients with presumed low cardiovascular risk in emergency department.
FP023 Detection of arterial calcification by computer tomography in patients with presumed low cardiovascular risk in emergency department.

Background: Detection of arterial wall calcification (AC) by computed tomography (CT) scan is a marker of atherosclerosis and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). CT scans performed at the emergency department (ED) for any reason can detect AC. The use of AC as detected by emergency CT scan on reclassification of CVD risk has not been investigated yet.

Aims: To investigate the frequency of AC detected by CT scan performed for non-cardiac conditions at the ED among subjects with presumed low CVD risk, and its impact on CVD risk assessment.   

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1010 subjects from 18 to 45 years old consecutively admitted to the ED of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, who had a non-coronary CT scan performed for several emergency conditions  and laboratory samples in the last 6 months. Eleven clinical and previous laboratory data were evaluated: gender, age, previous history of diabetes, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, smoking status, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, non-HDL cholesterol (nHDLc), LDL and triglycerides, and compared between patients without (G1) and with (G2) AC. CVD risk was classified using the European Heart Score risk prediction and management program.  For numerical variables were performed independent t test or multivariate logistic regression. Categorical variables were analysed by qui-square or Fisher´s exact test.

Results: A total of 899 subjects were scored as low CVD risk, of which 141 (15,6%) had AC detected by CT scan. Thirty patients had more than one emergency department evaluation. Comparisons between G1 and G2 patients, respectively, showed:

Age 36±7 vs 39 ±5 years, p<0,001. TC 180,8 ± 37,5 vs 179,5 ± 33,6 mg/dl, p=0,480. LDL106,2 ± 32,24 vs 104,5 ± 30,5 mg/dL, p=0,674. HDL 53,5 ±15,3 vs 52,1 ± 16,6 mg/dL p=0,716. SBP: 122 (±17) vs 125(±18), p=0,697. DBP: 77 (±13) vs 80 (±15) mmHg, p=0,01. Gender: male 277(36,5%) vs 52(36,8%) p=0,939. Smoking: 2 (1,41%) vs 25 (3,29%) p=0,939. After adjustment for confounders, DBP did not remain associated with AC, but each year increase in age was independently associated with a 10,8% higher risk of AC (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,073-1,145)

CT scans were performed at nineteen different sites. No differences related to AC detection were found among CT sites.

Conclusions: In this study almost 16% of low cardiovascular risk subjects presented AC. Age and diastolic blood pressure was associated with AC. These  data rise the importance to discuss if subclinical atherosclerosis in extra-coronary territory, detected by CT scan, may reclassify low risk patients.


Tarso A. D. ACCORSI, Flavio TOCCI MOREIRA (São Paulo, Brazil), Janaina Cubo VARELLA, Tatiana HELFENSTEIN, Eliane Roseli BARREIRA, Munique Rafaela Borges Rios BIANCHI, Ronaldo Hueb BARONI, José Leão SOUZA JUNIOR, Paulo Marcelo ZIMMER
16:40 - 18:10 #16071 - FP024 short-term prognostic value of Endothelial function associated with TIMI score in acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
FP024 short-term prognostic value of Endothelial function associated with TIMI score in acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Introduction: The management of ACS is a challenge for physicians. One of
the most important goal of this management is the evaluation of the prognosis of
the disease. The TIMI score can be used as a tool to predict the short-term
prognosis of the ACS, but it remains insufficient. By combining the TIMI score
with other non-invasive (NI) methods, we can hope to improve its prognostic
performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of NI
measurement of the endothelial function (EF) by EndoPAT in predicting the
prognosis when associated with TIMI.
Methods: This is a prospective study conducted from March 2016 to September
2017, enrolling patients presenting to the emergency department for non-
traumatic chest pain with suspicion of ACS (n = 515). We excluded patients
with hemodynamic instability, myocardial infarction requiring emergency
revascularization and parkinsonian syndrome. For each patient the demographic
and clinical data were collected, the TIMI score was calculated and the
measurement of the EF (Endo-PAT) (Tunisian Health Tonics Device) 
proceeded. Endothelial dysfunction is defined by an HRI (Hyperemia Reactive
Index) &lt; 67%. During a follow-up period of one month the onset of major
cardiovascular events (MACE): (myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, death)
was noted.
Results: A total of 153 patients (29.7%) were diagnosed with ACS. The mean
age was 56 years with predominantly male patients (62.7%). The mean TIMI
score was 1.6. MACEs were observed in 42 patients (27.45%). A TIMI score
&lt; 2 had a sensitivity of 59; specificity of 57; PPV and NPV respectively of 12
and 93. The combination of the HRI to the TIMI score improved his sensitivity
and NPV that have gone respectively from 59 to 88 ([74-96]; 95% CI); 93 to 96
([91-98]; 95% CI).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the Endo-PAT improve the TIMI score
short-term prognostic performance in ACS by increasing the sensitivity and the
NPV.


Nadia BEN BRAHIM (TOURS cedex 9), Naoures JOMAA, Maroua TOUMIA, Mohamed Amine MSOLLI, Adel SEKMA, Kaouther BELTAIEF, Semir NOUIRA
16:40 - 18:10 #14815 - FP025 Injury Outcomes of the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia Targeted Automobile Ramming Mass Casualty (TARMAC) Attack.
FP025 Injury Outcomes of the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia Targeted Automobile Ramming Mass Casualty (TARMAC) Attack.

BACKGROUND:

There has been a significant increase in the incidence of Targeted Automobile Ramming Mass Casualty attacks (TARMAC) worldwide since 2010. Terrorist groups including ISIS and Al Qaeda have published TARMAC instructions for their followers to use, and non-terror TARMAC attacks are increasing as well. The dramatic increase in incidence warrants special attention to the unique pattern of injury associated with such attacks. The injuries expected from such an attack are unlike any other type of intentional mass casualty attack. The goal of this study was to characterize injuries inflicted during a TARMAC attack in Charlottesville, VA in 2017 treated at the University of Virginia Health System, a single, urban, level one trauma center.

METHODS:

The emergency department records from the primary receiving trauma hospital on the day of the attack were reviewed. Victims of the ramming attack were identified, and their demographics and injuries were entered into a database for pattern analysis. Inpatient medical records of admitted patients were reviewed to determine further operative needs and length of stay.

RESULTS:

There were 19 total TARMAC victims treated in the UVAHS Emergency Department on the day of the attack. The majority were female (68%) and had an average age of 29.4 years (range 13 – 72 years). Disposition data showed 7 ICU admissions, 4 acute care admissions, and 7 discharges to home. There was 1 immediate fatality and the specific injury data was unavailable. The majority of the injuries were orthopedic: lower extremity fractures (n=7) [2 open], upper extremity fractures (n=7), axial skeleton fractures (n=6), and a facial fracture (n=1). Arterial injuries occurred requiring interventional radiology treatment (n=1) or observation (n=2). Organ injuries included a Grade 1 spleen laceration (n=1) and a pneumomediastinum (n=1). 6 victims required one or more operative interventions during admission: emergent procedures (n=6) and delayed procedures (n=4). In the Emergency Department 2 bony reductions were performed, 5 lacerations were repaired, and 1 thoracotomy was performed. Injury Severity Scores were calculated (mean=11.5; median 6; range 1-75)

CONCLUSIONS:

Due to the mechanism of injury, TARMAC attacks inflict a unique wounding pattern. Intentional mass blunt trauma is previously unknown to emergency medicine. Vehicle variables including weight, speed, and bumper height affect the injury location and severity. This vehicle, a low-height sports car, inflicted primarily lower extremity injuries. Mortality rates have been higher in attacks involving taller, heavier vehicles, as seen in France, Germany, and Sweden. Analysis of victim data from TARMAC attacks will help emergency medicine physicians, surgeons, and disaster medicine specialists to prepare, train, and mitigate against this increasingly frequent tactic.

 



This study did not require specific registration nor is there an appropriate registry for such research. This study did not receive support from any form of funding. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The review received approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Virginia Health System.
James PHILLIPS (Washington, DC, USA), Jeffrey YOUNG, William BRADY
16:40 - 18:10 #15612 - FP026 Disaster training and knowledge in Flemish ambulance personnel.
FP026 Disaster training and knowledge in Flemish ambulance personnel.

Introduction: With a dense petrochemical industry and several nuclear installations Flanders is at risk for CBRN (Chemical Biological Radionuclear) incidents. The Brussels bombings revealed the risk for terror attacks and the region is prone to natural disasters as floods. Ambulance personnel will be the first to be confronted with the care for victims of these incidents but are the trained to do so?

Material and methods: An online survey looking for demographic parameters, self-reported risk, knowledge and willingness to work on 8 potential scenarios was presented to Flemish ambulance personnel through their professional organization, federal health inspection and cross societies. Self-reported scores were correlated with a set of practical and theoretical questions on the subject.

Results: As we’re still collecting data preliminary results on the first 1324 respondents are presented. Male/Female ratio was 80/20 and 34% of the respondents reported that they were professional ambulance personnel. Mean age was 21 years and 32% stated they had some disaster courses before. 78% found it absolutely necessary to include this training in the basic ambulance curriculum. 32% worked on a fire department or civil protection-based ambulance. 46% stated that they had any links with a fire department apart from their ambulance activities, 8% with the military, 5% with the civil protection, 7% with CBRN-industry and 50% with critical hospital departments. 73% had a practical training in the use of personal protective equipment and 43% in decontamination, the majority was trained by their employer. 86% could use a tourniquet, 65% military hemostatic bandages and 36% radiodetection equipment.

Self-estimated risk for incidents to occur ranged from 3.9/10 for floods to 6.25/10 for mass shooting incidents. Self-estimated knowledge varied from 3.38/10 for biological incidents over 3.5/10 in nuclear incidents, 3.81/10 for Ebola outbreak to 5.69/10 in mass bombing incidents and 5.73/10 in mass shooting incidents. Willingness to work scores higher from 5.81/10 in nuclear incidents and 5.82/10 in Ebola outbreak over 7.1/10 in biological incidents to 8.1/10 in mass shootings and 8.57/10 in mass bombing attacks.

The practical/theoretical case mix revealed a high confidence in Iodium tablets: 46% believes they protect against external radiation, 12% will use them as first step in nuclear decontamination and 11% believe that they will limit radiation damage the most over distance and shielding. 37% directs potentially contaminated victims into the advanced medical post and 12.5% will intervene in a potential chemical hazard accident without prior fire department clearance.

Discussion: Although the knowledge scores are rather low, our study population scores better than their Dutch colleagues who have a longer and more severe basic training. We think that the impact of the links with the fire department, military and civil protection in a large proportion of our population could promote their preparedness. This has to be evaluated in the statistics on the definite study population.

In conclusion we can state that the knowledge and basis training on disasters of Flemish ambulance personnel can be improved. There is a clear perceived need to incorporate it in the basic ambulance curriculum.



No funding
Luc MORTELMANS (Antwerp, Belgium), Olivier HOOGMARTENS, Erik GENBRUGGE, Marc SABBE

18:15
18:15-19:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A14
OPENING CEREMONY

OPENING CEREMONY

Moderator: Ahmed KAZMI (eusem) (London, United Kingdom)
18:15 - 19:00 Official Opening of the Congress. Bailie Ade AIBINU (Keynote Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
18:15 - 19:00 President of EUSEM. Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy)
18:15 - 19:00 President of RCEM. Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Speaker, Leeds)
18:15 - 19:00 President of ECOC. Patrick PLAISANCE (Head of Department) (Speaker, Paris, France)

Monday 10 September
Time Clyde Auditorium Lomond Auditorium Room Alsh #1 Room Alsh #2 Room Boisdale Room Carron Room Etive Room Forth Room Fyne Room Gala Room M4
08:30
08:30-09:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A20
KEYNOTE LECTURE 1
Implementing change in EM

KEYNOTE LECTURE 1
Implementing change in EM

Speaker: Gareth CLEGG (Associate Medical Director) (Speaker, Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

09:10
09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A21
TRAUMA
The secrets of delivering state of the art major trauma care

TRAUMA
The secrets of delivering state of the art major trauma care

Moderators: Basar CANDER (Turkey), Karim TAZAROURTE (Chef de service) (Lyon, France)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
09:10 - 10:40 Management of traumatic brain injury in the Emergency Department. Fiona LECKY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Sheffield, United Kingdom)
09:10 - 10:40 Fragility fractures in Emergency Medicine. Tobias LINDNER (Consultant) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B21
GERIATRIC
Interactive Session - The big geriatric emergency medicine quiz-Test your knowledge with experts

GERIATRIC
Interactive Session - The big geriatric emergency medicine quiz-Test your knowledge with experts
Interactive Session

Moderators: Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Haarlem, The Netherlands), James WALLACE (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Warrington, United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
09:10 - 10:40 1. Abdominal Pain, 2. Confusion, 3. The risks of hospitalization, 4.De-prescribing workshop – examples! 5.Top 5 drug-related problems, 6. Silver Trauma, 7. Interpretation of vital signs, 8. Eye Emergencies, 9. Falls and gait, 10. Hip fractures – pain management, 11. Dizziness and syncope , 12. Parkinson, 13. Ultrasound Cases in Older Patients. Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Speaker, Haarlem, The Netherlands), James WALLACE (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Warrington, United Kingdom), Mehmet ERGIN (Speaker, Konya, Turkey), Pr Simon CONROY (Prof.) (Speaker, Leicester, United Kingdom), Bas DE GROOT (Emergency physician) (Speaker, AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands), Dr Arjun THAUR (Consultant) (Speaker, London)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D21
Surviving in... Emergency Medicine
Dealing with extraordinary situations or simply daily life - YEMD Session

Surviving in... Emergency Medicine
Dealing with extraordinary situations or simply daily life - YEMD Session

Moderators: Incifer KANBUR (Assistant doctor) (Istanbul, Turkey), Dr Dinka LULIC (Consultant in emergency medicine) (Zagreb, Croatia)
09:10 - 10:40 Surviving a terror attack day. Incifer KANBUR (Assistant doctor) (Speaker, Istanbul, Turkey)
09:10 - 10:40 Surviving as a resident in a new specialty - EM. Rok PETROVCIC (Resident) (Speaker, Maribor, Slovenia)
09:10 - 10:40 Surviving daily life and doing it all - organize yourself! Basak YILMAZ (Faculty) (Speaker, BURDUR, Turkey)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E21
PAEDIATRICS
Children in Mass Casualties

PAEDIATRICS
Children in Mass Casualties

Moderators: Dr Jeffrey FRANC (Associate Professor) (Edmonton, Italy), Said HACHIMI-IDRISSI (head clinic) (GHENT, Belgium)
09:10 - 10:40 PEM reflections on paediatric mass casualties at the Manchester bombing. Rachel JENNER (Consultant) (Speaker, Manchester, United Kingdom)
09:10 - 10:40 Why is PEM necessary in mass casulaties? Dr Gerlant VAN BERLAER (CHIEF OF CLINIC - SENIOR STAFF MEMBER) (Speaker, Brussels - BELGIUM, Belgium)
09:10 - 10:40 Lessons from the Haiti earthquake: an orthopaedic perspective. Simone LAZZERI (Speaker, Italy)
09:10 - 10:40 The central role of a children's hospital during a terrorist attack: experiences from Nice. Antoine TRAN (MCU-PH, médecin des urgences pédiatriques) (Speaker, Nice, France)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C21
PULMONARY
Evaluating the breathless patient

PULMONARY
Evaluating the breathless patient

Moderators: Christoph DODT (Head of the Department) (München, Germany), Dr Nicolas LIM (Consultant Emergency Medicine) (Singapore, Singapore)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
09:10 - 10:40 CAP: Corticoids, Aseltamivir and Pathologic Glucose? Christoph DODT (Head of the Department) (Speaker, München, Germany)
09:10 - 10:40 Age adjusted D-Dimer in PE. Andy NEILL (Doctor) (Speaker, Dublin, Ireland)
09:10 - 10:40 Assessment of the acutely dyspneic patient with ultrasound. Dr Nicolas LIM (Consultant Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Singapore, Singapore)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F21
FREE PAPER 4
Clinical Decision Guides and rules / CPR / Resuscitation

FREE PAPER 4
Clinical Decision Guides and rules / CPR / Resuscitation

Moderators: Felix LORANG (Consultant) (Erfurt, Germany), Agnès RICARD-HIBON (Medical Chief) (Pontoise, France)
09:10 - 10:40 #15039 - FP028 The Glasgow triage system: a simple, pragmatic, physiological score based triage system that demonstrates improved performance and reduced hospital admission rates.
FP028 The Glasgow triage system: a simple, pragmatic, physiological score based triage system that demonstrates improved performance and reduced hospital admission rates.

Introduction

Triage seeks to bring order and rationale to a potentially chaotic clinical environment. The most widely practiced method of Emergency Department (ED) triage in Europe is the Manchester triage system (MTS) that was introduced in 1997. It is reported that “the validity of the MTS is moderate to good”, however it is our experience that too many Majors patients are assigned to category 3 and that clinical granularity is lost. With rising numbers of frail elderly patients attending the ED and the increasing frequency of access block, this lack of differentiation between ‘true’ category 3 patients and physiologically well ‘condition specific’ category 3 patients has become more clinically relevant.

Our new triage system combines a validated physiological early warning score (NEWS), clinical trigger systems (e.g. sepsis 6), condition specific fast track pathways (e.g. fractured neck of femur) and most importantly, the clinical gestalt of our nursing staff.

This system has been piloted and fully implemented in Glasgow Royal Infirmary ED (GRI-ED).

 

Methods

The new triage system commenced 1st July 2017. The twelve-week study period started on 31st July. Seasonal variation was removed by comparing the same three-month period in 2016.

Records of all attendances at EDs across NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde were obtained from Trakcare (Intersystems 2014) during the study period.

 

Results

A total 47,335 patient attendances at GRI-ED were available for analysis.

Two 12 week sample groups were analysed (2016 n=23,660) (2017 n= 23,675)

The median number of patients seen per day in these periods was similar (257 versus 259 for 2016 and 2017 respectively).

More patients were assigned to triage categories 4 (12% pre and 42% post change) (p<0.001) and 5 (0.23% pre and 15% post) (p<0.001), while significantly fewer were assigned to categories 0 (13% pre and 1% post) (p<0.001), 2 (14% pre and 9% post) (p<0.001) and 3 (57% pre and 28% post change) (p<0.001).

Only category 1 remained relatively unchanged (2.7% pre and 3% post).

Interestingly, there was no overall difference in median time to first assessment between the two samples (71 minutes and 71 minutes in 2016 and 2017 respectively) (p = 0.377 by Wilcox test). However, there were significant changes in time to first assessment within each triage category, particularly category 3 (92 mins pre and 82 mins post)(p<0.001). There was no overall difference in median length of stay between the two samples (157 minutes pre and 159 minutes post) (p = 0.59), however the median length of stay increased in the lower triage categories: 4 (130 mins pre and 154 post) (p<0.001) and category 5 (69 mins pre and 127 mins post) (p<0.001).

Despite the absence of a significant change in median length of stay, a significant improvement in compliance with ‘the four-hour target’ (89.8% in 2016 period versus 93.1% in 2017 period) (p < 0.001). Importantly, admissions fell significantly, from 35% in 2016 to 32% in 2017 (p < 0.001).

 

Conclusion

This simplified triage system has empowered our nurses, improved compliance with the 4 hour target and reduced admissions. 


Hugh MCDONALD, Donogh MAGUIRE (Glasgow, United Kingdom)
09:10 - 10:40 #15042 - FP029 A Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Imaging Utilization for Minor Head Injuries in the Emergency Department.
FP029 A Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Imaging Utilization for Minor Head Injuries in the Emergency Department.

Background & aim statement

More than 90% of head injuries (HI) presenting to emergency departments (EDs) are minor HIs. Over-utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in the ED results in exposure of patients to unnecessary radiation and increases health-care resource utilization, including patients’ length of stay (LOS) in the ED. Using recommendations of the Choosing Wisely Campaign (CWC) and quality improvement (QI) methodology, we developed a local initiative with an aim to reduce the CT scan rate for patients presenting with HIs by 10% over a 6-month period at two academic EDs. This was felt to be both achievable and meaningful by our stakeholder group.

 

Measures & design

Baseline CT scan rates for patients with HIs were determined through a local 10-month retrospective cohort review. We used stakeholder engagement and provider surveys to develop our driver diagram and PDSA cycles, which included: 1) Assessing and improving provider knowledge about the CWC recommendations; 2) Testing, refinement and implementation of a Canadian CT-head Rule modified checklist in the ED; 3) Developing and giving patients CWC-themed handouts pertaining to HI best practice; 4) Bimonthly reporting of CT scan rates to providers (both medical and nursing). Our primary outcome measure was the number of CT scans performed for patients with HIs. Process measures included the number of checklists completed and patient’s ED LOS. Our balance measure was return visits to the ED within 72-hours for this patient population.

 

Evaluation/results

Baseline rate of CT scans prior to our interventions was 47.9%. Our QI initiative resulted in a significant ‘shift’ in the run chart of the weekly proportion of CT scan rates, associated with the second PDSA cycle cluster. We observed a 16% relative decrease in CT scans at 3 months (47.9% to 40.5%) and 10.4% at 8 months (47.9% to 43.1%). ED LOS for HI patients decreased by 12 min (237min to 225min). 33% of total checklists were completed. There was no immediate increase in 72-hr return visits following implementation of our initiative, but a small increase of 0.16% was observed during the 8-month study period (4.0% vs 4.16%).

 

Discussion/impact

Our local QI initiative was successful in decreasing CT rates both in the short- and long-term for patients presenting with HI. The decrease in effect at 8 months suggests the need for continued feedback and reminders to ensure ongoing sustainability. Other centres could use similar QI methods, as well as the materials we developed, to achieve similar results of improved evidence-based utilization of diagnostic tests.


Lucas CHARTIER (Toronto, Canada), Joo YOON, Sameer MASOOD
09:10 - 10:40 #15663 - FP030 Combinations of symptoms at presentation to the emergency department and related outcomes. An all-comer observational study.
FP030 Combinations of symptoms at presentation to the emergency department and related outcomes. An all-comer observational study.

Background

Patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a variety of symptoms. The assessment of symptoms at presentation offers readily available information, which is of great importance for clinical workup and possibly for outcomes. The predictive power of certain individual symptoms, such as dyspnoea, is well known. However, research has mainly focused on the investigation of single chief complaints, neglecting the fact that patients usually present to the ED with more than one symptom. A recent study showed that the number of symptoms reported at triage was 2 median (range 0-25), with women reporting significantly more symptoms. Knowledge on combinations of symptoms has great potential in the process of risk stratification.

We therefore aimed to identify the most common combinations of symptoms in an all-comer ED population and to report their related outcomes, such as hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality.

 

Methods

A consecutive sample of all patients presenting to the ED of the University Hospital Basel was included over a time course of 6 weeks. The presence of 35 predefined symptoms was systematically assessed upon presentation, by a dedicated study team asking patients whether or not the symptom was present at the very moment.

 

Results

3960 emergency patients (median age 51, 51.7% male) were included. Hospitalisation occurred in 1237 (31.2%), ICU admission in 219 (5.5%) of all cases, and 55 (1.4%) patients died during hospital stay. Out of 3733 patients with complete one-year follow-up, 215 (5.8%) died within one year of presentation. The three most frequent combinations of two symptoms were headache and dizziness in 281 (7.1%) patients, fatigue and weakness in 275 (6.9%) patients, and weakness and dizziness in 200 (5.1%) patients, respectively. As for combinations of more than two symptoms, weakness, fatigue and dizziness (n = 106, 2.7%), and weakness, fatigue, dizziness and headache (n = 62, 1.6%), were reported most frequently. Three combinations of two symptoms were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality; fatigue and weakness (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.59), headache and weakness (OR = 3.31), fatigue and dizziness (OR = 2.94), whereas several combinations were predictive for the outcome of hospitalisation.

 

Discussion & Conclusions

Several combinations of symptoms are frequent at presentation to the ED. Nonspecific complaints, such as weakness and fatigue, are among the most frequently reported combinations of symptoms, and are associated with adverse outcomes. The higher the number of symptoms reported, the higher the prevalence of nonspecific complaints, making it harder to come up with a working diagnosis that leads to focused clinical workup. Systematically assessing symptoms may add valuable information on the prognosis and may therefore influence triage, work-up, and disposition.



No trial registration occurred. Study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (236/13, www.eknz.ch). This study did not receive any specific funding.
Tobias KUSTER (Basel, Switzerland), Christian H. NICKEL, Mirjam JENNY, Lana BLASCHKE, Roland BINGISSER
09:10 - 10:40 #15685 - FP031 Old and new screening tools for sepsis and septic shock in an emergency department all-comer population.
FP031 Old and new screening tools for sepsis and septic shock in an emergency department all-comer population.

Objectives

Delayed recognition is the major cause of disability and mortality in sepsis. Since sepsis is not only an ICU problem, we aimed to compare the performance of qSOFA, NEWS and SIRS for identifying patients with community-acquired sepsis in an all-comer emergency department (ED) cohort.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we included all consecutive patients presenting to the ED over a period of 3 weeks. We excluded patients with end stage dementia, those with ongoing life support and patients who declined to participate. Vital parameters, mental status and triage category were recorded at the time of ED arrival by triage clinicians. Demographics, laboratory measurements, microbiology tests and outcome variables were obtained from the hospital’s electronic health record. We defined “suspicion of infection” as the start of a course of antibiotics in the ED or the draw of a microbiological test within 24 hours after ED presentation.

Two independent experts retrospectively assigned a gold-standard diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria. Patients eligible for review had a sepsis-related ICD-10 code at discharge or positive blood cultures drawn within 24h after ED presentation.

We calculated the discriminative performance of the scores using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) analysis for sepsis and septic shock. We tested performance criteria for various cut-offs. We used suspicion of infection as a control variable.

Results

2930 patients presented to the ED in the study period, of which 2523 (86.1%) were included in the final analysis. Suspicion of infection was found in 634 patients in the hospital database: antimicrobial therapy in the ED was given to 186 patients, and 592 underwent microbiological testing within 24 hours presentation. The chart abstraction resulted in 68 charts being reviewed, of which 6 patients were classified as sepsis and 10 as septic shock due to community-acquired infections. AUC for early sepsis or septic shock was 0.76 (95%CI 0.63-0.89) for qSOFA, 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-0.99) for SIRS and 0.90 (95%CI 0.84-0.95) for NEWS.

Conclusion

While qSOFA may serve as a valuable tool for the identification of increased risk of adverse outcomes, we found that it performed poorly as a screening tool for early identification of sepsis in the emergency department.



The study was registered at the local ethics committee (236/13, www.eknz.ch). We received no external funding for the realisation of the study.
Ricardo NIEVES ORTEGA, Christiane ROSIN (Basel, Switzerland), Roland BINGISSER, Christian H. NICKEL
09:10 - 10:40 #15821 - FP032 Informal vs. formal triage: A prospective study on two triage systems in an all-comer emergency population.
FP032 Informal vs. formal triage: A prospective study on two triage systems in an all-comer emergency population.

Objectives: The objective was to compare the performance of “informal triage” with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in an all-comer emergency population.

Background: Triage remains one of the key-tasks in emergency patients. A reliable and valid triage is crucial to prevent unnecessary deaths, morbidity and waste of medical resources. The ESI is a well-established triage tool, used emergency departments across the US but also in Europe.

Triage tools are being discussed controversially. Mainly because they differentiate not well in lower acuity.

Patients at risk can be identified using a first clinical impression, also called “Informal Triage”. We wanted to assess whether “Informal Triage” can outperform ESI theoretically in terms of identifying critically ill patients and in predicting mortality. If useful, this simple tool could help to save resources.   

Methods: Prospective data of 7131 patients collected in the emergency departments of the university hospital of Basel, a tertiary-care university hospital. We assessed if informal triage could theoretically replace formal triage by registering data regarding the question “how ill does this patient look?” as rated by physicians. Our primary endpoint was in-hospital-mortality and 30 day-mortality. Other endpoints included admission to hospital and ICU-admission.

Results: During a time span of three weeks each in the years 2013, 2015 and 2017 we included a total number of 7’131 patients. A total of 293 patients with a missing ESI-Score or a lacking informal triage score were excluded. 6’858 patients could be analysed using a complete dataset.

The Area under the Curve (AUC) for 30d mortality rate was 82.8% with a confidence interval (CI) of 78.6%-86.9% for the informal triage by a senior doctor. The AUC of the ESI triage was 75.3% with a CI of 71.2%-79.5% (P-Value < 0.001).

We received similar results for hospitalization: AUC of informal triage 80.5%, (CI: 79.4-81.5%) and AUC of ESI-triage 77.7% (CI: 76.7-78.7%), (P-Value < 0.001), for ICU admission: AUC informal triage 84.0% (CI: 82.1%-85.9%) AUC of ESI-triage 81.5% (CI: 79.7%-83.4%), (P-Value = 0.018), as well as for the in hospital mortality rate: AUC informal triage 85.9% (CI: 81.9-89.9%), AUC of ESI-triage 81.6% (CI: 77.8-85.3%), (P-Value = 0.012).

Conclusions:

Triage by physician by first clinical impression (“informal triage”) was theoretically able to predict various outcomes more precise than the Emergency Severity Index.


Severin Manuel BAERLOCHER (Basel, Switzerland), Christian NICKEL, Tobias KUSTER, Roland BINGISSER
09:10 - 10:40 #14540 - FP033 The impact of a treatment escalation / limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms to patients approaching the end of life in an acute hospital. A cohort study.
FP033 The impact of a treatment escalation / limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms to patients approaching the end of life in an acute hospital. A cohort study.

Background


Nearly 10% of patients who are admitted to an acute hospital die during the course of their admission, many of whom will have passed through an Emergency Department (ED) along the way. Treating ED patients who are dying in the same way as those who have a reversible cause for their illness can not only be futile but also harmful and costly. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a treatment limitation escalation plan (TELP) in improving care of patients approaching the end of life.

Method

Retrospective case note review of 300 consecutive in patient deaths was carried out to assign them to one of three cohorts:1. Had a DNACPR order only, 2. Had both a DNACPR and a TELP, or 3. Had neither. A power calculation indicated that a sample of 98 patients in each group was required. Case reviewers used the Structured Judgement Review Method to make a determination of occurance of non-beneficial intervention (NBI) or harm. A sample of 20% of the reviews were checked by a second reviewer for quality control and to generate a Kappa value. The primary outcome was to determine if there was a significant difference in the rate of harms between each cohort. Statistical analysis using Poisson regression and comparison of Incidence Rate Ratios was carried out. Limitations were the inability to blind the reviewers to cohort allocation and potential judgement bias of the author who was involved with development of the TELP.

Results


Case notes were available for 289 patients. Numbers of patients in the 3 cohorts decribed above were 155, 113 and 21 respectively. The 'neither DNACPR nor TELP' cohort therefore did not have sufficient numbers to report statistical significance. This is explained by the high number (93%) of patients who had a DNACPR order. Patients in cohorts 1 and 2 were found to be similar in terms of age distribution and ward where they died. Analysis showed significant difference in both the number of NBIs and harms occuring between the cohorts (p<0.01). This was true both for the rate occurring per 100 cases and the rate per 1000 bed days. Kappa scores were favourable for the 4 reviewers involved, ranging from 0.74 - 0.85.

Discussion


In this study we demonstrated that use of a TELP in addition to a standard DNACPR significantly reduced the frequency of NBIs and harms, therefore resulting in significantly better care for patients who are nearing the end of life. Other studies have confirmed a reduction in harms using a TELP. The incidence of NBIs, or under treatment of a patient's palliative care needs has also been well documented.

In the ED, we need to be aware of the high number of patients passing through our care who are nearing the end of life. Where appropriate, we should be putting a TELP in place, not just a DNACPR. 



Not applicable.
Calvin LIGHTBODY (Lanarkshire, United Kingdom), Robin TAYLOR
09:10 - 10:40 #14773 - FP034 Prolonged Transport of Patients After Out-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Primarily to Regional Cardiac Arrest Center (CAC) Doesn´t Affect Initial Hemodynamic Parameters and Outcomes.
FP034 Prolonged Transport of Patients After Out-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Primarily to Regional Cardiac Arrest Center (CAC) Doesn´t Affect Initial Hemodynamic Parameters and Outcomes.

Introduction: Systematic care of patients after OHCA and developement of CAC is recommended by the guidelines, but important „contra“ argument is prolonged transport of often hemodynamicly unstable patients in limited prehospital emergency care.
Aim: To determine if prolonged primarily transport of patients after OHCA to regional CAC influence initial hemodynamic parameters after admission, mortality a neurological outcome.
Methods: Analysis from prospective OHCA Registry of regional CAC from 2013 to 2017. Data were divided into 2 datasets: 1) INSIDE - when CAC is the nearest hospital and 2) OUTSIDE - patients transfered to CAC, but in past  would be transferred to one of the 7 another closer hospitals in the region. We observed duration of transport, baseline characteristics ( age, gender, bystander CPR, ROSC, shockable rhythm, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), catecholamins administration during transfer), hemodynamic parameters on arrival to hospital (systolic BP, lactate, pH, SpO2, body temperature and initial doses of vasopressors and inotropics) and final outcomes (30-day/in-hospital mortality,  length of ICU stay, artificial ventilation days, 1 year CPC).
Results: 232 patients were enrolled after OHCA in years 2013 to 2017, 27 were excluded for insuficient data and 19 for secondary transfer to CAC. We analyzed 186 patients, 93 in both groups. We observed no differences in baseline characteristics in both groups: men (66,7% vs. 80,6%, p= 0.29), age (64,51±1.324 years vs. 61.25± 1.443 years , p= 0.1), shockable rhythm (65,6% vs. 74,2%, p= 0.26), bystander CPR (68,8% vs. 72%, p= 0.75), ROSC (median, IQR) :17 (11-26) min vs. 20 (15-30) minutes, p= 0.29, ACS ( 44,1% vs. 48,4%, p= 0.66) and catecholamine administration during tranfer (80% vs. 70%, p= 0.18). We observed no differences in initial hemodynamic parameters in time of  admission in both groups. Systolic blood pressure: (median,IQR): 103 (82-120) vs. 105(82-124)mm Hg, p= 0.6, serum lactate level (median,IQR): 4.6 (2-8.1) vs. 3.5 (2-6.75) mmo/l, p= 0.372, pH (median,IQR): 7.242 (7.122-7.322) vs. 7.286 (7.177-7.318), p=0.159, body temperature: (median,IQR): 35.95 (35.08-36.5) vs. 36 (35.5-36.5), p=0.218 and oxygen saturation (SpO2):(median,IQR): 95 (91-100) vs. 98 (94-100), p= 0.14.
We observed no differences in catecholamins dosages. Norepinephrine (7.54±+1.75 vs. 5.98±1.17 mcg/min), p= 0.46 and dobutamine ( 66.31±45.81 vs. 38.6±15.62 mcg/min),p=0.56. There was no significant difference in in-hospital/30-day mortality between groups ( 44.1% vs. 42.3%, p= 0.88). 1-year good neurological outcome (CPC 1,2) was identical ( 54,2% vs 54.2%, p= 0.999). Median of artificial ventilation duration was without significant difference: (median/IQR) 3 (1-8) vs.5 (1-7.75) days, p= 0.36 and median of lenght of ICU stay was without significant difference: (median/IQR) 6 (2-14.75) vs. 7 (3-12) days, p= 0.74.
Conclusion: Strategy of primary transport of patients after OHCA to CAC significantly prolonged time of transport, but didn´t affect hemodynamic parameters and outcome of patients.


Jiri KARASEK, Jiri KARASEK (Prague, Czech Republic), Jiri SEINER, Metodej RENZA, Frantisek SALANDA, Martin MOUDRY, Matej STEJCEK, Jan LEJSEK, Rostislav POLASEK, Petr OSTADAL
09:10 - 10:40 #14838 - FP035 Quality of bystander-performed chest compressions and prehospital advanced life support differently affect the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity-matched observational study.
FP035 Quality of bystander-performed chest compressions and prehospital advanced life support differently affect the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity-matched observational study.

Background: Ideally, prehospital advanced life support (ALS) should be preceded by good-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation including chest compressions (CCs). This study aimed to investigate how differently quality of bystander-performed CCs on emergency medical service (EMS) arrival and provision of ALS by EMS paramedics affect the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) receiving bystander CPR.

Methods: Prospective observational study with propensity-matched analyses was conducted in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan during the period of 2012 2016 after obtaining ethical approval from a local committee. Of 3.088 adult (8 years) OHCAs receiving bystander-performed CCs on EMS arrival, CC qualities were determined in 3,004 cases by two EMS personnel including at least one paramedic qualified for ALS on their arrival at the scene, according to the standard recommendations: depth (one-third of chest depth or >5 cm), rate (100120), proper position and adequate decompression. When two EMS personnel judged all criteria to be met, the quality was recorded as adequate. Primary outcome measure was neurologically favourable one-year survival. Secondary outcomes were sustained (>20 min) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and one-month survival. After analysing the effects of good-quality CCs and ALS on outcomes and their interaction using a stepwise multivariable regression in all 3,004 OHCAs, propensity-matching procedures were applied for CC quality and ALS provision. Propensity-matchings and stepwise multiple regression analyses included CC quality, ALS provision, time intervals, backgrounds and characteristics of OHCAs.

Results: When analysed for all OHCAs, prehospital ALS (adjusted OR, 1.60; 95%CI, 1.28–1.99) but not good-quality of bystander-performed CCs was associated with sustained ROSC. Neither prehospital ALS nor good-quality CCs affected one-month survival. However, good-quality of bystander-performed CCs (3.33, 1.31–14.9) was associated with higher chances of neurologically favourable one-year survival, whereas prehospital ALS (0.20; 0.04–0.52) was associated with lower chances of the survival. There was no considerable interaction between good-quality CCs and prehospital ALS in any outcome measure. Propensity-matched analyses in CC quality- and ALS provision-matched pairs confirmed these findings. The incidence of sustained ROSC in cases with ALS provision was considerably higher than that without ALS provision for ALS provision-propensity-matched pair (N = 968 each, 29.0 vs 24.7 %, 1.32; 1.071.64) The rate of neurologically favourable one-year survival in cases receiving good-quality CCs was considerably higher than that receiving poor quality for CC quality-matched pair (N = 636 each, 3.8 vs 1.6 %, 2.81; 1.296.59). However, the rate of neurologically favourable survival in cases with ALS provision was lower than that without ALS provision for ALS provision-matched pair (N = 968 each, 1.5 vs 5.1%, 0.20; 0.100.39). The rate of 1-M survival did not considerably differ between the two groups in CC quality- or ALS provision-matched pair. Stepwise multivariable analyses for CC quality- and ALS provision-matched pairs revealed that witness status and initial ECG rhythm are other common and major factors associated with the outcomes.

Conclusions: Quality of bystander-performed CCs but not prehospital ALS provision is essential for neurologically favourable survival. Every effort should be made in a commuty to improve the quality of CCs before EMS arrival.


Hideo INABA, Kurosaki HISANORI (Kanazawa, Japan), Yukihiro WATO, Yutaka TAKEI
09:10 - 10:40 #14926 - FP036 The prognostic significance of repeated prehospital defibrillations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival.
FP036 The prognostic significance of repeated prehospital defibrillations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival.

Objectives

Patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with an initial shockable rhythm have a better prognosis than their counterparts. While patients requiring more shocks may be expected to have worse outcomes, the prognostic implications of recurrent or refractory malignant arrhythmia in such context remain unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between the number of prehospital defibrillations delivered and resuscitation outcomes (survival to hospital discharge and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) among patients in OHCA.

Methods

Adult patients with an initial shockable rhythm over a 5 year period were included from registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. In order to ensure that this analysis would be immediately applicable, the relationship between the number of prehospital defibrillations delivered and the probability of both resuscitation outcomes was first analyzed in a way to reflect the dynamic nature of clinical decision-making such that each level of analysis represents the likelihood of the resuscitation outcome up to that number of shocks. For the alternative analysis, patients were separated in two groups according to the number of prehospital defibrillations they received: less than three or at least three. Resuscitation outcomes (survival to hospital discharge and prehospital ROSC) of the patients included in these two groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared tests. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression model was planned using a standard approach adjusting for pertinent variables to assess the independent association between the number of prehospital defibrillations administered and the resuscitation outcomes.

Results

A total of 1788 patients were included in this analysis, of whom 583 (33%) survived to hospital discharge. The probability of survival was highest with at the first defibrillation (33% [95% confidence interval {CI} 30-35%]), but decreased to 8% (95% CI 4-13%) following nine defibrillations. The same is observed for the probability of prehospital ROSC, which begins at 54% (95% CI 51-56%) and lowers to 24% (95% CI 18-30%) following nine defibrillations. Patients having received three defibrillations or more (median number of prehospital defibrillations: 5 [Q1-Q3: 4-8]) were less likely to survive to hospital discharge (22 vs 41%, odds ratio [OR] =0.41 [95% CI 0.33-0.50], p<0,001) and to experience prehospital ROSC (40 vs 64%, OR=0.38 [95% CI 0.31-0.46], p<0,001) than their counterparts (median number of prehospital defibrillations: 1 [Q1-Q3: 1-2]). In multivariable logistic regression models, a higher number of prehospital defibrillations received was independently associated with lower odds of survival (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88 [95% CI 0.85-0.92], p<0.001) and with lower odds of prehospital ROSC (AOR=0.85 [95% CI 0.82-0.88], p<0.001).

Conclusions

For patients with OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm, requiring more defibrillations is independently associated with worse outcomes. Despite that requiring more defibrillations is independently associated with worst outcomes in that population, there does not seem to be an evident cut-off that would predict bad resuscitation outcomes and the number of shocks received should not influence treatment decisions alone.



This project received funding from the ‘Fonds des Urgentistes de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal’ and the ‘Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d’urgence de l’Université de Montréal’.
Dr Alexis COURNOYER, Raoul DAOUST (Montréal, Canada), Éric NOTEBAERT, Sylvie COSSETTE, Luc LONDEI-LEDUC, Luc DE MONTIGNY, Dave ROSS, Yoan LAMARCHE, Brian POTTER, Alain VADEBONCOEUR, Catalina SOKOLOFF, Martin ALBERT, Francis BERNARD, Judy MORRIS, Jean PAQUET, Jean-Marc CHAUNY, Massimiliano ISEPPON, Martin MARQUIS, François DE CHAMPLAIN, Yiorgos Alexandros CAVAYAS, André DENAULT

10:40 - 11:10 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
11:10
11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A22
PRE-HOSPITAL
Delivering high quality prehospital care

PRE-HOSPITAL
Delivering high quality prehospital care
Hot Topic inside!

Moderators: Alasdair CORFIELD (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Glasgow), Leif ROGNAS (HEMS Consultant) (Aarhus, Denmark, Denmark)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
11:10 - 12:40 Quality Indicators in Prehospital Care. Andreas KRUGER (Speaker, Norway)
11:10 - 12:40 HOT TOPIC: Performance under pressure. Stephen HEARNS (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 Simulation in Pre-Hospital Care. Gareth GRIER (Speaker, United Kingdom)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B22
TRAUMA
Minor but important: the expert approach to minor injuries

TRAUMA
Minor but important: the expert approach to minor injuries

Moderators: Rashid ABU-RAJAB (Consultant orthopaedic surgeon) (Glasgow, United Kingdom), Jean-Jacques BANIHACHEMI (MD PhD) (Grenoble, France)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
11:10 - 12:40 Knee examination tips and tricks from an emergency physician perspective. Patricia O'CONNOR (Consultant) (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 Benefit of MRI in shoulder injuries with normal x-ray. Jean-Jacques BANIHACHEMI (MD PhD) (Speaker, Grenoble, France)
11:10 - 12:40 Management of the injured hand. Franck VERSCHUREN (MD, PhD) (Speaker, Brussels, Belgium)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D22
How to read, write and present
Avoid death by powerpoint, learn to read papers and publish them - YEMD Session

How to read, write and present
Avoid death by powerpoint, learn to read papers and publish them - YEMD Session

Moderators: Lucas CHARTIER (Deputy Medical Director) (Toronto, Canada), Jona SHKURTI (Albania)
11:10 - 12:40 Talk like a pro - make your presentation stand out. Martin FANDLER (Consultant) (Speaker, Bamberg, Germany, Germany)
11:10 - 12:40 Go, get published. Luca CARENZO (SIMULATION COMPETITION ONLY) (Speaker, NOVARA, Italy)
11:10 - 12:40 How to critically read literature. Jona SHKURTI (Speaker, Albania)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E22
PAEDIATRICS ABSTRACT AWARD
PEM Research. A joint initiative of REPEM, APEM and PERUKI

PAEDIATRICS ABSTRACT AWARD
PEM Research. A joint initiative of REPEM, APEM and PERUKI

Moderators: Rianne OOSTENBRINK (pediatrician) (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Dr Damian ROLAND (Paediatric EM) (@damian_roland, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 Towards integrated care for febrile children in the emergency department: progress and challenges in Europe. Dr Damian ROLAND (Paediatric EM) (Speaker, @damian_roland, United Kingdom), Rianne OOSTENBRINK (pediatrician) (Speaker, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
11:10 - 12:40 #14682 - PEM01 Hemispheric cerebral oximetry (rcSO2) readings in Status Epilepticus in a pediatric emergency department: relationship to seizure complexity, anticonvulsant therapy and possible prediction trends.
PEM01 Hemispheric cerebral oximetry (rcSO2) readings in Status Epilepticus in a pediatric emergency department: relationship to seizure complexity, anticonvulsant therapy and possible prediction trends.

Pediatric seizures are 1% of all ED visits,can causes neuronal injury and be pharmaco-resistant. Pediatric ED seizure’s high manifestation variability can cause delays or be unrecognized. For every first-line anticonvulsant minute delay (> 5minutes), a 10% greater risk for longer seizures >60 minutes, diminishing anticonvulsant efficacy, increase status epilepticus (SE) incidence and duration. A seizure ‘s cerebral physiology assessment tool, which current ED lacks, would enhance critical decision-making.  

Pediatric hemispheric rcSO2reading reflects cerebral physiology; rcSO<60%, >80% equates to abnormal cerebral physiology, neurological insult, and pathology.In EEG - rcSOseizures, altered rcSO2correlated to seizures. PED non-epileptic generalized seizure patients, rcSO2readings were either <60% or >80%, and returned to pre-seizure rcSO2readings.Comparison of hemispheric generalized SE rcSO2 readings < 60 to >80% in relationship to seizure severity and anticonvulsant interventions is lacking.

Purpose: PED Correlational analysis of hemispheric SE rcSO2<60% to >80% readings to  SE’s complexity and anticonvulsants.

Methods:  Observational study comparing SE rcSO2readings to seizure complexity and anticonvulsants in PED non-traumatic, neurologically normal, first-time seizure patients.

Results:  From 2014-17, 101 SE patients were analyzed.  TABLE 1

There were more initial <60% than >80% rcSO2readings (p<0.001), not associated with age (p=0.5). Comparing initial seizure rcSOreadings: rcSO<60%, had a longer EMS (p=0.0002), PED (p=0.001) seizure duration, and required more EMS (p=0.001) and PED (p=0.0009) anticonvulsants compared to those with rcSO>80%.

Overall PED comparison: rcSO2 <60% was associated with longer seizures (p=0.0002) and requiring more anticonvulsants (p=0.003). Patients cSO2 readings (p=0.0005) compared to >2 yrs. For >2 yrs, had more seizure rcSO2 readings >80% (p=0.003). However, age was not independently associated with anticonvulsant use (p=0.08) or EMS seizure duration (p=0.19).

More PED anticonvulsants were required with seizure rcSO2 readings <60% [left 48.3% (37.8-58.2, p=0.0007), right 42.6% (35.7-55.3, p=0.0005)], and EMS seizure duration >23 minutes (p=0.005). Age showed no significance (p=0.17).

Seizure rcSO2 readings during nonresponsive anticonvulsants, <60%, >80% rcSO2 readings were consistent with delta change of < 5% (p<0.0001). Seizure rcSO2 reading rcSO2 > 80% changed earlier than rcSO2 < 60%( p=0.001) and both changed earlier than EMR seizure cessation time (p=0.001). 

Postictal rcSO2 readings in the < 60%,>80% group returned to baseline  ( p<0.0001) while >80% returned faster than rcSO2 <60% (p=0.001). Comparing patient's EMR seizure cessation time to Seizure rcSO2 reading < 60%,> 80% changed earlier than rcSO2 < 60%( p=0.001) and both changed earlier than EMR seizure cessation time (p<0.0001). 

 Conclusion: In PED SE seizures, EMS seizure duration >23 minutes and seizure rcSOreadings < 60% correlated with greater seizure complexity by longer seizure duration and more anticonvulsants   compared to rcSO>80%. Comparing seizure cessation times, seizure rcSO2 > 80% changed earlier than rcSO2 < 60% while both rcSO2readings changed earlier then clinical seizure cessation. Seizure neuroresuscitation should strive for rapid cerebral physiology, therapeutic assessment and should be an integral component for initial pediatric seizure assessment. Hemispheric seizure cerebral oximetry monitoring has shown its functionality for rapid seizure cerebral physiology, anticonvulsant assessment while initial seizure rcSO2 readings has potential for predicting patient's seizure complexity and anticonvulsant needs.

 

 


Dr Thomas ABRAMO MD (Apex, USA), Hannah BAER, Hailey HARDGRAVE, Z HARRIS, Thomas MCCARTY, Nicholas PORTER MD, Cruz VELASCO GONZALEZ
11:10 - 12:40 #14970 - PEM02 Utility of chest X-rays in febrile infants under three months of age: the Maltese scenario.
PEM02 Utility of chest X-rays in febrile infants under three months of age: the Maltese scenario.

Background 

Febrile young infants, i.e. those under three months of age, are regarded as being at risk of serious bacterial infection. In Malta, all such infants would have a full sepsis work up, including chest X-ray (CXR). This national study aimed to assess the yield of routine CXR in febrile young infants. Our secondary goal was to establish baseline evidence for local applicability of NICE guideline CG160 recommendations that CXRs should only be performed in febrile young infants with signs of respiratory distress. The outcome was a change in practice, namely avoiding empiric CXRs in febrile young infants.

Methodology

This retrospective study targeted all young infants who were admitted to the state hospitals providing paediatric care in Malta after presenting to the emergency department with fever. Patients were identified from ward handover records over a two year period (2014-2015). Signs of respiratory distress, i.e. tachypnoea, nasal flare, crackles, cyanosis, recessions and oxygen saturations below 96%, were correlated to the presence or absence of pneumonia on CXR. The images were reported by a paediatric radiologist who was blinded to the clinical details. The rates of pneumonia were compared between two groups of patients – those with or without signs of respiratory distress. P values were calculated using McNemar’s test. 

Results

A total of 173 patients were identified; 147 febrile young infants (those having CXR and complete records) were included in the analysis. Median age was 48.5 days; 60.1% were males. Median temperature was 38.3°C and 7.5% (n = 11) had pneumonia on CXR. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 20.8% (5/24) patients with signs of respiratory distress and in 4.9% (6/123) of patients without respiratory distress (p = 0.015). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the presence of any sign of respiratory distress for diagnosis of pneumonia were 0.45 (95% CI 0.18 – 0.75), 0.86 (95% CI 0.79 – 0.91), 0.21 (95% CI 0.08 – 0.42) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.89 – 0.98) respectively. The difference was more significant (p = 0.0098) in the subgroup of infants aged between 29 to 90 days (n = 110), with pneumonia being present in 5 of 18 patients (27.8% [95% CI 9.7 – 53.5%]) with signs of respiratory distress but only in 2 of 92 patients (2.2% [95% CI 0.3 – 7.6%]) without respiratory distress. Conversely, all neonates with respiratory distress (n = 6) had a normal CXR while 12.9% of neonates (n = 4) without signs of respiratory distress were diagnosed with pneumonia.

Conclusion

Pneumonia was diagnosed in 7.5% of all febrile young infants. Only 2.2% of patients aged between 29 to 90 days had pneumonia in the absence of any signs of respiratory distress. We therefore suggest that routine CXRs prior to admission should be avoided in febrile infants aged between 29 to 90 days without signs of respiratory distress. Since none of the neonates with pneumonia had respiratory distress at presentation, further evidence is needed before applying the same recommendation to the neonatal age group in Malta.

 


Dr Ruth FARRUGIA (Malta, Malta), Charles BORG, Veronica SAID PULLICINO, André S. GATT
11:10 - 12:40 #14984 - PEM03 Acute traumatic coagulopathy in childhood and high mobility group box 1.
PEM03 Acute traumatic coagulopathy in childhood and high mobility group box 1.

Abstract

Introduction: Coagulopathy and bleeding are important factors affecting mortality in trauma patients.  
The incidence of coagulopathy in pediatric trauma patients varies between 28% and 51%.
Acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC) is not only caused by hemodilution, hyperfibrinolysis and acidosis; but also it has got a complex nature including; inflammation, cellular and endothelial dysfunction, hyperfibrinolysis, and changes in platelet function.  There is a limited number of adult studies in relation to the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB 1) and ATC.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between HMGB 1 level and ATC and the effects of HMGB 1 in early diagnosis of ATC in pediatric trauma patients

Materials and Methods: This prospective case- control study was conducted in pediatric patients with trauma (1- 18 years). A hundred trauma patients and 50 healthy controls were enrolled between August 2016 and May 2017. Demographic data, vital signs, physical examination, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Score (ISTH DIC score), laboratory values, transfusion requirements, the needs of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit observation were recorded. Blood samples for HMGB 1 were collected within 2 hours and assessed by enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: The median age in the patient group was 9.0 (4.0- 13.7) years. Sixty seven patients had multiple trauma and 33 had isolated head trauma. Sixty five patients had mild head injury, 11 patients had moderate head injury and 24 patients had severe head injury. According to ISTH DIC score, 3 patients had disseminated intravascular coagulation and 35 patients had ATC. In trauma patients, HMGB 1 levels were statistically higher than control group [(1.47 ng/ mL (1.29-1.88), 1,16 ng/ mL (0.79-1.41), respectively; p = 0,000]. We found correlation between trauma severity and HMGB 1 levels according to PTS, ISS and GCS. There was a positive correlation between HMGB 1 levels and D-dimer levels (r = 0.589, p = 0.000).  ATC patients had higher plasma HMGB 1 levels than those without ATC [1,84 ng/mL (1,44-1,93), 1,47 ng/mL (1,03-1,87), respectively; p = 0,008]. HMGB 1 level was associated with days of mechanical ventilation, need of intensive care unit observation, length of hospital stay and mortality.

Conclusion: This study indicated that HMB 1 levels were increased in pediatric trauma patients and associated with early phase of coagulopathy, trauma severity and mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of HMGB 1 levels on mortality and disseminated intravascular coagulation.


Emel ULUSOY (Izmir, Turkey), Murat DUMAN, Aykut ÇAĞLAR, Tuncay KÜME, Anıl ER, Fatma AKGÜL, Hale ÇITLENBIK, Durgül YILMAZ, Hale ÖREN
11:10 - 12:40 #15214 - PEM04 Prevalence of respiratory viral infections in febrile young infants with elevated blood biomarkers.
PEM04 Prevalence of respiratory viral infections in febrile young infants with elevated blood biomarkers.

In 2014 the step-by-step (Mintegi et al, Emerg Med J.), a new approach for management of febrile infant, was published. This approach tried to safely rule out invasive bacterial infections (bacteremia and bacterial meningitis), showing high sensitivity, but low specificity. It is known that some viruses may cause elevation of blood biomarkers, so it is possible that a significant proportion of false positive of the approach due to elevated biomarkers might be infections due to these viruses, indeed. 

 

Main objective of the study was to analyze if the infection by certain respiratory viruses may cause false positives due to blood biomarkers elevation in step-by-step approach.

 

METHODS:

This was a prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study, that included febrile infants (38ºC), between 22 and 90 days old, in which the presence in nasopharyngeal swab of a respiratory virus will be determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Panel (Luminex, Austin TX, USA)].  Patients with an altered blood level of C-reactive protein (CRP), absolute neutrophils count (ANC) or procalcitonin (PCT) were included in study group. Blood biomarkers were considered as altered according as cut-off points determined in step-by-step approach (CRP >20 mg/L; PCT 0.5 ng/ml; ANC >10000 cel/ml). Those with normal biomarkers were considered as control group. Differences between groups in categorical variables were analyzed with chi square test. 

 

RESULTS:

In the period of study, 55 patients were included. The mean age was 50.7 days (SD 18.7), and 32 (58.2%) were male. The mean temperature was 38.4ºC (SD 0.37), with a median time of evolution of the fever of 4 hours (IQR 1-10). It was the first febrile episode in life for 48 (87.3%) patients. Ten patients (18.2%) had alterations of biomarkers (ANC, 2 patients; CRP, 4 patients; PCT, 7 patients). In the group of study were positive more frequently PCR for Metapneumovirus (16.7% vs 0%, p=0.006), Parainfluenza 4 (8.3% vs 0%, p=0.056) and Enterovirus/Rhinovirus (50% vs 30.3%, p=0.203). The study had some limitations. Main one was the small sample size. Second one was that the used PCR did not allowed to diferentiate between Enterovirus and Rhinovirus positive results.

The study has several limitations. The first one was the small size of the sample. A second one was that PCR reactive did not allowed to differentiate between Enterovirus and Rhinovirus.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Some respiratory viruses might elevate blood biomarkers level. Further research is needed to determine which ones are associated with false positives of step-by-step approach. Point-of-care tests for these viruses may be useful to improve specificity of Step-by-step approach. 


Dr Roberto VELASCO (Laguna de Duero, Spain), Juncal MENA, Ivan SANZ, Jose Manuel SANCHEZ, Jorge CARRANZA, Fernando CENTENO, Raul ORTIZ DE LEJARAZU
11:10 - 12:40 #15333 - PEM05 Can Integrated Pulmonary Index predict hospitalization in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis?
PEM05 Can Integrated Pulmonary Index predict hospitalization in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis?

Background:

The Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) is an algorithm consisting of a combination of pulse rate and respiratory rate, end-tidal CO2 and oxygen saturation.  It is automatically calculated by some monitors. Based on IPI score, the patient's respiratory status is scaled between 1 and 10 (10 normal, 1 requires immediate intervention). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of IPI for the hospitalization in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis.

Methods:

Patients with moderate-severe bronchiolitis between 01.01.2017 and 30.04.2017 in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital in Turkey were evaluated prospectively. Before the treatment (after nasal lavage), the vital signs, clinical severity score score (CSS), IPI (Smart Capnography, Medtronic), and venous blood gas analysis were obtained. According to our protocol, the hospitalization indications as: toxic appearance, poor feeding, lethargy, dehydration, hemodynamic instability, apnea, hypoxemia, those who did not recover their clinical status despite 6 hours of emergency observation. We divided the patients in two groups and compared (discharged from the emergency observation unit vs. hospitalized).

Results:

A total of 141 patients with moderate-severe bronchiolitis (median age: 4 months; minimum: 1, maximum; 24; 52 female / 89 male) were included in the study. 29 cases (20.6%) were born premature, and 20 cases (14.2%) had chronic disease. 100 cases (70.9%) were admitted to the hospital (5 cases to the pediatric intensive care unit; 3 patients were mechanically ventilated). No patients were lost. There were not significant differences in terms of venous pH, pCO2, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 and CSS between two groups (p>0.05). IPI was significantly lower (6 versus 7; p: 0.009) in hospitalized patients (p<0.05). In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, the Area Under Curve for IPI was 0.710 95CI%: 0.583-0.838; p<0.05)) for the prediction of hospitalization. IPI was significantly correlated with CSS (p<0.001; r: -413).

Discussion & Conclusions:

IPI measured by monitor before treatment in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis may be an effective parameter for predicting hospitalization.



No
Dr Murat ANIL, Gulsen YALCIN, Gamze GOKALP, Emel BERKSOY, Sema BOZKAYA YILMAZ, Sule DEMIR, Dr Murat ANIL (Izmir, Turkey)
11:10 - 12:40 #15832 - PEM06 Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric emergencies in Nicaragua.
PEM06 Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric emergencies in Nicaragua.

Background: Nearly 20 years after the publication of the Millennium Developmental Goals, pediatric mortality remains high in developing countries. Besides public health interventions, improvement of pediatric emergency care (PEC) could significantly contribute to reduce child mortality in these countries. However, PEC is an often neglected field and only scant data exist on the burden and characteristics of pediatric urgent and emergent visits to effectively guide the development and optimization of national PEC networks in low and middle-income countries.

Objective: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of pediatric urgent and emergent presentations to the PEC setting in Nicaragua and to identify risk factors of mortality.

Design/Methods: Registry based study of urgent and emergent visits to eight hospitals (one referral hospital in the country capital, Managua, and seven community hospitals) in Nicaragua from January to December 2017. A PEC network was set up in 2010 thanks to the collaboration between a group of Italian pediatricians sponsored by a non-profit organization with local stakeholders and the Ministry of Health. An electronic data collection system was set up and refined through multiple revisions following feedback from local doctors until a final data collection form in Redcap® was developed including key data on patients characteristics, management and outcomes. Criteria for definition of urgent and emergent cases were used as a triage system is inconsistently available at the participating centers.

Results: A total of 3,504 visits (2% of the global census of the participating centers) were entered in the database. 34% were children younger than one year, 18% were malnourished and 20% were affected by a chronic condition (mostly neurologic, 28%, respiratory, 20%, and cardiovascular, 20%). Main reasons of presentation were respiratory (46%), gastrointestinal (12%) and neurologic (11%) problems. The most frequent final diagnoses were pneumonia (36%), gastroenteritis (6%), and status epilepticus (6%). 7% of the patients admitted to the emergency department of peripheral hospitals required phone consultation with the referral hospital and 5% were referred. The overall mortality was 7%. 51% of the deceased patients were < 1 year of age and 31% died in the first 24 hours of initial assessment. The most frequent proximate causes of death were pneumonia (28%) and congenital heart diseases (10%). Septic shock was the most frequent immediate cause of death (43%). Risk factors of mortality from multivariate analysis were age <1 year (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.5), age >12 years (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.5-4.8), malnutrition (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.8), presence of co-morbidity (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.9), neurologic, respiratory and cardiologic chief complaints at presentation (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.5; OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.4 and OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.3-10.7 respectively).

Conclusion(s):  Urgent and emergent presentations to PEC in Nicaragua are not common but associated to a significant mortality either in the ED or during admission. These data on the characteristics and outcomes of most severe presentations to PEC services in Nicaragua will help best organize resources and quality improvement interventions with the final aim to reduce mortality and improve patient care.


Liviana DA DALT, Francesco MARTINOLLI, Miryam CHAMORRO, Raquel ABARCA, Soraya SOLANO, Giovanni MONTINI, Gianni TOGNONI, Fabio SERENI, Silvia BRESSAN (Padova, Italy)
11:10 - 12:40 The EcLiPSE trial: Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in status epilepticus. Mark LYTTLE (Speaker, Bristol, United Kingdom), Richard APPLETON
11:10 - 12:40 The joint REPEM, PERUKI and APEM Elizabeth Molyneux award.

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C22
ULTRASOUND
Breaking the waves - the world beyond FAST and RUSH

ULTRASOUND
Breaking the waves - the world beyond FAST and RUSH

Moderators: James CONNOLLY (Consultant) (Newcastle-Upon-Tyne), Senad TABAKOVIC (Medical director emergency department) (Zürich, Switzerland)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
11:10 - 12:40 POCUS and Bayesian Thinking-how to make good decisions and avoid false friends. Dr Nicolas LIM (Consultant Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Singapore, Singapore)
11:10 - 12:40 Guiding resuscitation with TEE. Felipe TERAN (MD) (Speaker, Philadelphia, USA)
11:10 - 12:40 POCUS vs. X-Ray. Beatrice HOFFMANN (Speaker, Boston, USA)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F22
FREE PAPER 5
Geriatrics / Shock

FREE PAPER 5
Geriatrics / Shock

Moderators: Tobias BECKER (Speaker) (Jena, Germany), Ellen WEBER (I have no idea what this means) (San Francisco, USA)
11:10 - 12:40 #14579 - FP037 CAM-ICU may not be the optimal screening tool for early delirium screening in older Emergency Department patients, a prospective cohort study.
FP037 CAM-ICU may not be the optimal screening tool for early delirium screening in older Emergency Department patients, a prospective cohort study.

Objective: Delirium is a frequent problem among older patients in the Emergency Department (ED) and early detection is important to prevent its associated adverse outcomes. Several screening tools for delirium have been proposed for the ED, such as the Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Previous validation of this tool for use in the ED showed varying results, possibly because they were administered at different or unknown time points. The aim was to study incidence of delirium in older (≥70 years) ED patients using the CAM-ICU.
Methods: Prospective cohort study, in one tertiary care and one secondary care hospital in the Netherlands. Patients aged 70-years and older attending the ED were included. Delirium screening was performed within 1 hour after ED registration using the CAM-ICU. The 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) was determined for comparison, using a cut-off point of  ≥14 points indicating possible delirium, which has previously associated with the presence of delirium using gold standard assessment.
Results: A total of 997 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 78 years (interquartile range 74-84). Delirium as assessed with CAM-ICU was positive in only 13 (1.3%) patients. 95 (9.5%) patients had 6-CIT ≥14.
Conclusions: We found a delirium incidence of 1.3% using the CAM-ICU, which was much lower than the expected incidence of around 10% as been frequently reported in literature and what we find when using the 6-CIT. Based on these results, caution is warranted to use the CAM-ICU for early screening in the ED.



This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW project number 62700.4001).
Jacinta LUCKE (Haarlem, The Netherlands), Jelle DE GELDER, Laura BLOMAARD, Jaap FOGTELOO, Jelmer ALSMA, Stephanie SCHUIT, Anniek BRINK, Bas DE GROOT, Gerard-Jan BLAUW, Simon MOOIJAART
11:10 - 12:40 #14665 - FP038 Older patients visiting the emergency department: a profile of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on preventability.
FP038 Older patients visiting the emergency department: a profile of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on preventability.

BACKGROUND

Elderly increasingly demand emergency department (ED) care, leading  to crowding.  ED visits have a profound impact on older patients, including high risks of adverse outcomes and loss of independency. The objective of this study was to evaluate  opinions of patients,  caregivers,  general practitioners (GPs)  and ED physicians (EPs) on the preventability of ED visits by older patients.
 
METHODS 

Prospective, observational and qualitative study of 200 patients of ≥70 years visiting a teaching hospital ED in the Netherlands between 24 July and 7 September 2017. Trauma-related visits were only included if a fall was involved. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients, caregivers and GPs. EPs  were provided with written surveys. Patient data was extracted to determine vulnerability. Primary outcome was the opinion of patients and healthcare providers. Secondary outcomes were consensus on preventability and the qualitative data derived from the interviews. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Cohen’s kappa (κ) was used to measure agreement of preventability assessments.
 
RESULTS 

The mean age of patients was 79.6 years, 49.5% was male. The majority of (95%) lived independently before the ED visit; only half the patients reported any form of domiciliary care (51.4%) or a caregiver (50%). Patients deemed 12.2% of visits potentially preventable; caregivers 9%, GPs 20.7% and EPs 31.2%. Consensus on preventability was poor, especially between patients and professionals. Whilst patients most frequently blamed themselves; healthcare providers predominantly mentioned lack of communication and organizational issues as contributing factors.
 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Despite being fragile, older patients who visit the ED in the Netherlands usually live independently and have a caregiver in only 50% of the cases. This is the first study to provide insight in the preventability of ED visits in the elderly according to patients, their caregivers, GPs and EPs. Patients consider an ED visit preventable less frequently than professionals. Little consensus was found between patients and healthcare providers, and the perspectives on contributing factors to a preventable visit differ between groups. In order to help improve geriatric ED care, future studies should focus on why these perspectives are so different and aim to align these.


Marloes VERHAEGH (Venlo, The Netherlands), Fransje SNIJDERS, Loes JANSSEN, Yvette MOL, Floortje KAMERMAN-CELIE, Nathalie PETERS, Louise VAN GALEN, Prabath NANAYAKKARA, Dennis BARTEN
11:10 - 12:40 #14858 - FP039 Retrospective audit of advanced care planning for care home patients presenting to the emergency department.
FP039 Retrospective audit of advanced care planning for care home patients presenting to the emergency department.

Background:

Providing healthcare services within the care home environment is the most desirable option for care home residents.Advanced care planning tools, such as Anticipatory Care Plans (ACPs) and Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) documents, help to provide patient-centred care in this setting. General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in facilitating this care and assessing when transfer to a higher level of care is required. In Aberdeen, the emergency department (ED) provides a medical decision support service for community practitioners through a dedicated phone line. Due to concerns raised by ED staff about the circumstances in which some care home patients were presenting to the ED this audit was primarily designed to review whether advanced care planning tools are being utilised for this patient group. Secondary aims were to understand more about the assessment of care home patients prior to transfer to ED and about their journey through the department.

 

Method:

This was a retrospective audit of routine clinical data extracted from the data management system Trakcare for the 112 care home patients who presented to the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary ED in January and February 2017 from Aberdeen city and Aberdeenshire. Further data was extracted from the ED documentation stored electronically on C-Cube. The audit was registered with the NHS Grampian Clinical Effectiveness Team (ProjID 3866) and ethics approval was not needed. The descriptive data was used to assess the availability of a DNACPRdecision or ACP in the ED, time of admission, reason for admission, duration of stay, and assessment prior to hospital transfer.

 

Results:

Analysis of the data showed that a DNACPR decision was available for 55% of patients and an ACP for 28% of patients. A third of patients had been discussed with or reviewed by a GP prior to hospital transfer and documented use of the ED decision-support service was found in 9% of transfers. Traumatic presentations accounted for the majority of transfers, there were equivalent numbers of presentations in and out of hours and 55% of patients were admitted to the hospital.

 

Discussion & Conclusions:

At a national level there has been considerable activity around advanced care planning and the national Guidance for Health and Care Professionals (2017) recommends that living in a care home should trigger the creation of an ACP. The results of this audit draw attention to an area for improvement in the advanced care planning processes for care home residents in Aberdeenshire. The audit results also highlight that consideration must be given to the barriers to unscheduled GP review for care home patients. Similarly, the infrequent use of the ED decision support service raises questions about how this service can be optimised. Inappropriate transfers to hospital are likely to be reduced by more widespread use of advanced care planning tools and increasing the percentage of care home patients reviewed by a GP prior to transfer to the ED. The result would be improved care for this patient group and more appropriate use of emergency services. 



NHS Grampian Clinical Effectiveness Team (ProjID 3866)
Jamie COOPER, Emma RISCHBIETH (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), Jamie COOPER
11:10 - 12:40 #14915 - FP040 Short-stay unit hospitalisation in acutely admitted older internal medicine patients - a randomised trial.
FP040 Short-stay unit hospitalisation in acutely admitted older internal medicine patients - a randomised trial.

Background: The effect of hospitalisation in emergency department-based short-stay units (SSUs) has not been studied in older patients. We compared SSU-hospitalisation with standard care at an Internal Medicine Department (IMD) in acutely admitted older internal medicine patients.

Methods: We conducted a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients aged 75 years or older, acutely admitted for an internal medicine disease, and assessed to be suitable for SSU-hospitalisation to SSU-hospitalisation or IMD-hospitalisation. SSU-hospitalisation was provided by a pragmatic ‘fast-track’-principle. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, change in Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL)-score within 90 days from admission, in-hospital length of stay, and unplanned readmissions within 30 days after discharge. All pre-planned analyses and interpretations were performed before the breaking of the randomisation code, but we included an evaluation of health care utilisation post-hoc (use and timing of diagnostic tests and treatments).

Results: Between January 2015 and October 2016, 430 participants were randomised (median age 84 years in both groups). Ninety-day mortality was 22 (11%) in the SSU-group and 32 (15%) in the IMD-group (OR 0.66; 95%CI 0.37-1.18; p=0.16). When comparing the SSU-group to the IMD-group, 16 (8%) vs. 45 (21%) experienced at least one adverse event (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.17-0.56; p<0.001); 6 (3%) vs. 35 (20%) experienced a reduction in iADL score within 90 days from admission (p<0.001); median in-hospital length of stay was 73 hours [IQR 36-147] vs. 100 hours [IQR 47-169], (p<0.001), and 26 (13%) vs. 58 (29%) were readmitted (OR 0.37; 95%CI 0.22-0.61, p<0.001). Fewer tests and treatments were applied in the SSU-group, and the time to chest x-ray, CT scans, point-of-care ultrasound, and physiotherapy was significantly shorter.

Conclusions: Mortality at 90 days after admission was not significantly lower in the SSU group, but SSU-hospitalisation was associated with a lower risk of adverse events, less functional decline, fewer readmissions, and shorter hospital stay. SSU hospitalisation may be preferable in  acutely admitted older internal medicine patients.



Trial registration: NCT02395718 CS recieved a Ph.d. stipend from Region Zealand and University of Copenhagen for this work (13-53) CS recieved funding for this project from Region Zealand Research Foundation (12-000095)
Dr Camilla STRØM (Copenhagen, Denmark), Lars Simon RASMUSSEN, Anne-Sofie LÖWE, Anne Kathrine LORENTZEN, Nicolai LOHSE, Kim Hvid Benn MADSEN, Søren Wistisen RASMUSSEN, Thomas Andersen SCHMIDT
11:10 - 12:40 #15069 - FP041 Unplanned Readmission prevention by Geriatric Emergency Network for Transitional care (URGENT): a single centre quasi-experimental study.
FP041 Unplanned Readmission prevention by Geriatric Emergency Network for Transitional care (URGENT): a single centre quasi-experimental study.

Background:

International guidelines recommend adapting the classic emergency department (ED) management model to the needs of older adults in order to ameliorate post-ED outcomes among this vulnerable group. To improve the care for older ED patients and specifically prevent unplanned ED readmissions, the URGENT care model was developed. The study aim was evaluating the effectiveness of the URGENT care model.

Methods:

A prospective single centre quasi-experimental study (sequential design with two cohorts, recruited from 1/12/2014 to 31/5/2015 and from 15/10/2015 to 31/5/2016, respectively) was conducted in the ED of University Hospitals Leuven. Dutch-speaking, community-dwelling ED patients aged 70 years or older were eligible for enrolment. Patients in the control cohort received usual ED care. Patient in the intervention cohort received the URGENT care model. The URGENT care model is a nurse-led, comprehensive geriatric assessment based care model in the ED with geriatric follow-up after ED discharge. The interRAI ED Screener© and clinical judgement of ED staff were used to identify patients at risk for unplanned ED readmission. A geriatric nurse was available during office hours to conduct CGA in at risk patients. Subsequently, a personalized interdisciplinary care plan was made. Discharged at risk patients were offered case manager follow-up. Hospitalized at risk patients received follow-up on a geriatric ward or by the inpatient geriatric consultation team if considered necessary. The effectiveness of the URGENT care model was measured primarily on 90-day unplanned ED readmission rate. Secondary outcome measures were hospitalization rate, ED length of stay (ED LOS), in-hospital length of stay, 90-day higher level of care, 90-day functional decline and 90-day mortality. The required sample size was 751 patients per cohort, making a total of 1502 patients. Cause-specific hazard-ratios, relative risks, logistic regression and a lognormal model were used when appropriate. In all analyses, a propensity model was used to handle the potential difference in patient mix between the cohorts. Bonferroni correction was applied if considered relevant.  

Results:

Unplanned ED readmission occurred in 170 of 768 (22.1%) control cohort (CC) patients and in 205 of 857 (23.9%) intervention cohort (IC) patients (P=.11). Statistically significant secondary outcomes were ED LOS (CC: 19.1 versus IC: 12.7 hours respectively; P=.0003), hospitalization rate (CC: 67.0% versus IC: 70.0%; P=.0.0026) and functional decline (CC: 21.5% versus IC: 26.6%; P=.0.023). ED LOS and hospitalization rate remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.

Conclusions:

The URGENT care model shortened ED LOS and increased the hospitalization rate, but did not prevent unplanned ED readmissions.

 



Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered retrospectively with ISRCTN (ISCRCTN91449949). Funding: The (Flemish) government agency for Innovation by Science and Technology funded this study (file number: 135182). Ethical approval and informed consent: The Medical Ethics Committee of University Hospitals Leuven (B322201422910) approved this study.
Els DEVRIENDT, Pieter HEEREN (Leuven, Belgium), Steffen FIEUWS, Nathalie WELLENS, Mieke DESCHODT, Johan FLAMAING, Marc SABBE, Koen MILISEN
11:10 - 12:40 #15089 - FP042 Adherence to geriatric emergency department guidelines in routine care.
FP042 Adherence to geriatric emergency department guidelines in routine care.

Adherence to Geriatric Emergency Department guidelines in routine care

Introduction Older people visiting the emergency department (ED) are at risk of adverse outcomes. Since the number of older people presenting to EDs increases, there is growing interest in the complex health care needs of this patient group. Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) guidelines provide recommendations on how to improve care for these patients. The aim of this study was to describe adherence to GED guidelines for older ED patients.

Methodology This was a prospective observational cohort study including ED patients aged 70 years or older, during two months from 8am till 11pm. The following recommendations of the ACEP GED Guidelines were observed in a two-months inclusion period as a proxy for guideline adherence: use of urinary catheters, family presence, use of hospital bed instead of ED gurney and provision of food during ED stay. The degree of a stressful environment was measured by counting the number of involved care providers and the number of door movements of the treatment room.

Results In total 998 older patients visited the ED, of which 605 (60.6%) were observed during their ED stay. Urinary catheters were used in 6.8% of all older patients. For 88.8% of patients family was present, 35.6% of patients were nursed on a bed and 7.4% of patients received food during their ED visit. The mean number of involved care providers was 8 (SD=3.7) and the median number of door movements of the treatment room during ED treatment was 41 (IQR=24-62).

Conclusions Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines adherence is low. The use of urinary catheters and presence of family in the ED seems good, but there is room for improvement of hospital bed use, presence of food and stressful environmental factors. To make sure that routine care follows guidelines, interventions such as education programs and environmental changes seem necessary.

During the conference this data will be compared with data after implementation of a system improvement program.


Laura BLOMAARD (Leiden, The Netherlands), Frank VAN BAARLE, Anja BOOIJEN, Jacinta LUCKE, Jelle DE GELDER, Jacobijn GUSSEKLOO, Simon MOOIJAART, Bas DE GROOT
11:10 - 12:40 #15596 - FP043 Using music to improve the experience of patients with dementia in the emergency department - an observational study.
FP043 Using music to improve the experience of patients with dementia in the emergency department - an observational study.

Background

 

Music has been shown to have a beneficial effect in patients with dementia for managing specific effects such as agitation, and improving communication. We hoped to demonstrate that using patient or carer selected playlists could improve the ED experience for patients with dementia and facilitate care.

 

Methods

 

We looked at a case series of consecutive patients presenting to the ED with a known diagnosis of dementia, who were displaying features of distress such as increased agitation. Music was delivered via an MP3 player with either headphones or a mini speaker depending on patient preference. Patients and/or carers selected a playlist of around 30 minutes. A number of musical genres including hymns, folk songs and others were available. The response was assessed using a simple evaluation tool with visual categories for mood assessment, and looking for presence of positive and negative behaviours and indicators such as smiling, eye contact etc.

 

38 “playlist episodes” in 24 patients were reviewed. Mood was scored from 1 (happy, represented by a smiling emoticon) to 3 (distressed, frowning emoticon) at the beginning and end of the playlist. Mood was assessed by the patient where they were able to communicate, or by carers. Witnessed behaviours were indicated by tick boxes, and carers were able to add comments if wished. 

 

Results

 

Of the 38 episodes, 2 had no post music score recorded. Average “mood score” prior to playlist for the completed 36 episodes was 1.842, post playlist was 1.054 (P value <0.00001). No patient was more distressed after than before, and the majority showed an improvement. A total of 86 positive behaviours and 5 negative behaviours were recorded. There were a number of positive comments from carers and family members.

 

No patients were recorded as refusing/unable to participate when music was offered.

 

Discussion

 

The fastest growth in ED attendances in the UK is for patients over 65. Studies report the incidence of cognitive impairment in these patients as between 21% and 40%. There is an increasing body of evidence that patients with dementia are vulnerable to adverse outcomes of hospitalisation. 

 

A review of behavioural disturbances in the ED showed that in elderly patients with cognitive impairment, behavioural disturbances were both more frequent and more severe. These patients have an increased risk of developing acute delirium while in the ED, and delirium has been shown to worsen outcome.

 

Music has been shown to be helpful in patients with dementia in a number of studies, including recently in the context of residential care, improving symptoms of depression and agitation. There are no reported negative consequences in the available literature.

 

Our study suggests that music can be beneficial in modifying the stressful experience of an ED attendance for these patients. It is easy to deliver, has no demonstrated adverse effects and involves minimal resource allocation or staff training. We intend to continue to use this intervention in our department and would recommend it to other EDs who manage patients with dementia.



With grateful thanks to www.playlistforlife.com who provided the MP3 player and initial music downloads
Lucinda GORRIE (Fife, United Kingdom), Maggie CURRER
11:10 - 12:40 #14877 - FP044 Clinical prediction rule for distinguishing bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis.
FP044 Clinical prediction rule for distinguishing bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis.

Background: The Bacterial meningitis score (BMS) accurately identifies children with pleocytosis at low or high risk of bacterial meningitis. To include new biomarkers (procalcitonin [PCT], C reactive protein [CRP]) may be helpful to design a more accurate decision support tool.

Objective: To design a more accurate decision support tool to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis.

Design/Methods: We carried out a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including children aged 29 days to 14 years who presented with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis at 25 Spanish participating emergency departments (ED) between 2011 and 2016 to develop a Meningitis Score for ED (MSE). We excluded critically ill patients, those non-previously healthy, those with purpura and those who had received antibiotics previously. To select the variables of the score we included those with an area under the RUC curve higher than 0.90; to select the optimal cut-off point we used the Youden index; finally, variables independently associated with bacterial meningitis were ranked according to the magnitude of the beta-coefficient.

Results: We included 819 children with pleocytosis (758 aseptic meningitis, 61 bacterial meningitis) The MSE was developed attributing 3 points for serum PCT (>1.2 ng/mL), 2 point for CSF protein (>80mg/dL) and 1 point for serum CRP (>40 mg/l) and CSF absolute neutrophil count (>1000 cells/mm3). The negative predictive value of a MSE value of 2 or higher for bacterial meningitis was 100% (95% CI 99.5-100; vs 99.3%; 95% CI 98.4-99.7% of a BMS value of 2 or higher). Of the 758 children diagnosed with aseptic meningitis, 639 had a MSE value = 0 (84.3%, 95% CI 81.5-86.7; vs 390, 51.4%, 95% CI 47.9-55.1% children with BMS=0).

Conclusion(s): The MSE accurately distinguishes bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. To include PCT and CRP increases the performance of the BMS.


Santiago MINTEGI (Bilbao, Spain), Silvia GARCIA, Eunate ARANA-ARRI, Isabel DURAN, Maria-Jose MARTIN, Javier BENITO, Catarina FERNANDEZ, Susanna HERNANDEZ-BOU
11:10 - 12:40 #15917 - FP045 Is prehospital blood transfusion safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
FP045 Is prehospital blood transfusion safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background
Life threatening hemorrhage accounts for 40% of mortality in trauma patients worldwide. Trauma is therefore the leading cause of death in patients aged 1-44 and in both civilian and military setting the most common cause of preventable death. After bleeding control is achieved, volume loss has to be restored. The positive effect of early in hospital transfusion of blood or blood components in equal proportions (1:1:1) is already proven but the scientific proof for the efficacy in the prehospital setting is still absent as a result of lack of randomized control trials.

Objective
Prove that prehospital transfusion of blood products is safe and effective on patients with extensive blood loss

Methods
Four databases have been searched: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and Pubmed in the period 1988 till March 2018.  After manually removing duplicates 2573 articles were screened on title and abstract by at least 2 reviewers. Articles were excluded when complied with the following exclusion criteria: no blood or blood products administered, animal study, no prehospital setting and no original data. 240 articles were subsequently screened on full text. Finally, a total of 48 articles have been included. Data was analyzed by meta-analysis for mortality.

Results
There was no significant difference in total mortality OR 1.09, 95% CI  [0.89, 1.33] or 24-hour mortality OR 0.93; 95% CI [0.64, 1.34]  for patients who received prehospital blood products, compared to standard care with crystalloids. A total of 4739 patients were transfused and 3 of them developed a complication which was possible the result of the transfusion (0.07%). Thirteen included studies advice the use of fluid warmers before transfusion.


Conclusion

The administration of blood products in the prehospital environment is safe, seems feasible but proof of efficacy is lacking.  Blood products have to be administered in equal proportions and heated before transfusion to minimize the risk to worsen hypothermia. Larger and randomized studies are required to demonstrate a statistically significant effect of the use of combined use of blood products.


Tim RIJNHOUT (Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

12:30
12:30-14:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

YEMDSPEED
YEMD Speed Networking Session
Ask the questions you’ve always wanted to ask, but never had the chance to…

YEMD Speed Networking Session
Ask the questions you’ve always wanted to ask, but never had the chance to…

12:40
12:55
12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D2I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Expert analysis of a POC hsTnI and the ability to rule-out in 15 minutes of arrival to the ED.

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Expert analysis of a POC hsTnI and the ability to rule-out in 15 minutes of arrival to the ED.

Moderators: Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Manchester), Paul JARVIS (Director of Global Medical Affairs) (Pudsey, United Kingdom)
12:55 - 13:55 Is it possible to safely rule-out myocardial infarction within 15 minutes of a single blood-draw on arrival at the ED? The state-of-the-art appraisal of point of care troponin tests and a glimpse of the future. Martin THAN (Keynote Speaker, New Zealand)

12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C2I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
NOAC reversal: A new landscape of reduced risk Topic: Antithrombotic therapy and reversal agents

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
NOAC reversal: A new landscape of reduced risk Topic: Antithrombotic therapy and reversal agents

12:55 - 13:10 NOACs: the current landscape. John CAMM (Keynote Speaker, United Kingdom)
13:10 - 13:25 Management of patients on NOACs: trauma experiences. Sylvia HAAS (Keynote Speaker, Germany)
13:25 - 13:40 Examining NOAC reversal agents. Deepa ARACHCHILLAGE (Keynote Speaker, United Kingdom)
12:55 - 13:55 Completing the Picture of NOAC Reversal: Factor Xa Reversal. Alexander COHEN (Keynote Speaker, United Kingdom)

13:55
14:10
14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A23
GERIATRIC
Suffering, comfort and healing - challenges of geriatric emergency medicine

GERIATRIC
Suffering, comfort and healing - challenges of geriatric emergency medicine
Hot Topic inside!

Moderators: Roland BINGISSER (Basel, Switzerland), Pr Christian NICKEL (Vice Chair ED Basel) (Basel, Switzerland)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
14:10 - 15:40 Frailty. Pr Christian NICKEL (Vice Chair ED Basel) (Speaker, Basel, Switzerland)
14:10 - 15:40 Silver Trauma (the changing face of trauma). Tim COATS (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Leicester, UK)
14:10 - 15:40 Sepsis in Older Patients: Recognition and Management. Bas DE GROOT (Emergency physician) (Speaker, AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands)
14:10 - 15:40 ! HOT TOPIC: End-of-life Care in Older Patients. Mary DAWOOD (Consutant Nurse) (Speaker, Windsor, United Kingdom)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B23
ULTRASOUND HIGHLAND GAMES
Interactive Session

ULTRASOUND HIGHLAND GAMES
Interactive Session
Interactive Session

Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
Speakers: James CONNOLLY (Consultant) (Speaker, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne), Beatrice HOFFMANN (Speaker, Boston, USA), Dr Nicolas LIM (Consultant Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Singapore, Singapore), Eftychia POLYZOGOPOULOU (ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE) (Speaker, ATHENS, Greece), Senad TABAKOVIC (Medical director emergency department) (Speaker, Zürich, Switzerland), Felipe TERAN (MD) (Speaker, Philadelphia, USA)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D23
Prehospital discussion: Doctors and paramedics
Education und ressource utilisation in prehospital EM (discussion) - YEMD Session

Prehospital discussion: Doctors and paramedics
Education und ressource utilisation in prehospital EM (discussion) - YEMD Session

Moderators: Matthew GREEN (Clinical Supervisor) (Hull, UK, United Kingdom), Dr Jana SEBLOVA (Emergency Physician) (PRAGUE, Czech Republic), Katarina VESELA (MD) (Prague, Czech Republic)
14:10 - 15:40 Education: HEMS experience. Luca CARENZO (SIMULATION COMPETITION ONLY) (Speaker, NOVARA, Italy)
14:10 - 15:40 Education: Out of hospital cardiac arrest. Matthew GREEN (Clinical Supervisor) (Speaker, Hull, UK, United Kingdom)
14:10 - 15:40 Education: Doctor AND paramedic. Katarina VESELA (MD) (Speaker, Prague, Czech Republic)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E23
PAEDIATRICS
PEM Education

PAEDIATRICS
PEM Education

Moderators: Julia SURRIDGE (NHS Foundation Trust) (Derby, United Kingdom), Pr Luigi TITOMANLIO (Head of Department) (Paris, France)
14:10 - 15:40 #FOAMus highlight. Gregor PROSEN (EM Consultant) (Speaker, MARIBOR, Slovenia)
14:10 - 15:40 How can #FOAMed be useful to you? Dr Damian ROLAND (Paediatric EM) (Speaker, @damian_roland, United Kingdom)
14:10 - 15:40 Simulation in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Procedural Sedation and Analgesia. Oren FELDMAN (Physician) (Speaker, Ramat Gan, Israel)
14:10 - 15:40 Developing a PEM educational programme in South Africa. Baljit CHEEMA (Speaker, Cape Town, South Africa)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C23
TRAUMA
The Changing Face of Trauma

TRAUMA
The Changing Face of Trauma

Moderators: Basar CANDER (Turkey), Franck VERSCHUREN (MD, PhD) (Brussels, Belgium)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
14:10 - 15:40 Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury. Frank PEACOCK (Vice Chair of Research) (Speaker, Houston, USA)
14:10 - 15:40 Silver trauma – observations from the largest European Trauma Registry. Fiona LECKY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Sheffield, United Kingdom)
14:10 - 15:40 Trauma call: State of the art beyond ABCDE. Tobias LINDNER (Consultant) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)
14:10 - 15:40 Diagnostic errors in the emergency department: follow up of patients with minor trauma. Pr Abdelouahab BELLOU (Director of Institute) (Speaker, Guangzhou, China)
14:10 - 15:40 Impact of trauma in Mexico. Carlos GARCIA ROSAS (Speaker, MEXICO, Mexico)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F23
FREE PAPER 6
Management / ED Organisation

FREE PAPER 6
Management / ED Organisation

Moderators: Yonathan FREUND (PUPH) (Paris, France), Door LAUWAERT (Manager) (BRUSSELS, Belgium)
14:10 - 15:40 #14495 - FP046 A comparative study on the effect of topical phenylephrine with topical tranexamic acid in management of epistaxis.
FP046 A comparative study on the effect of topical phenylephrine with topical tranexamic acid in management of epistaxis.

Background & Aims: Epistaxis is defined as acute hemorrhage from the nostril, nasal cavity, or nasopharynx. It is a frequent Emergency Department (ED) complaint and often causes significant anxiety in patients and clinicians. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare the administration of topical Phenylephrine with topical Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in management of epistaxis.

 Materials & Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 120 patients with epistaxis referred to Imam-Khomeini University in Urmia, Iran. Patients who met the inclusion criteria, were randomly allocated into two intervention and control groups. Sixty patients in the intervention group received one pledget soaked with TXA for 10 minutes in each nasal cavity. Sixty patients in the control group received Phenylephrine 0.5% with the same way. The cessation of bleeding in ED were evaluated by 10 minutes after the administration of the above-mentioned drugs.

 Results: Nasal hemorrhage was stopped in 17 out of 60 patients of control group received Phenylephrine (28.3%) while in the intervention group received TXA, 40 out of 60 patients (66.7%) experienced the cessation of their nosebleed that the difference was clinically and statistically significant (P<0.001).

 

Conclusion: According to study results, topical application of injectable form of TXA (500mg/5mL) can be used as an ideal drug in management of epistaxis in prehospital and hospital settings and subsequently leads to a reduction of extra costs and length of stay in the EDs.


Hamid Reza MEHRYAR, Atabaki PEYMAN, Dr Seyed Hesam RAHMANI (TABRIZ, Islamic Republic of Iran), Amin SOHEILI, Reza SAMAREI, Mir Salar ARIBI
14:10 - 15:40 #14581 - FP047 Improving patient flow in urgent care through online appointment scheduling.
FP047 Improving patient flow in urgent care through online appointment scheduling.

Background

Unlike traditional outpatient facilities, patients arrive at urgent care in a sporadic fashion, leading to peaks and troughs in patient volume, resulting in workflow challenges. On-line appointment scheduling systems have been proven successful in primary care and specialty clinics but have not been widely implemented in the urgent/acute care setting. We hypothesized that implementing an online appointment scheduling system at our urgent care clinic would reduce the variability of arrival times, reduce the initial surge at opening,  and decrease the arrival to bed and arrival to doctor times.

 

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study and collected data on individual arrival times and arrival to bed and to doctor times on all visits to our urgent care facility over the course of a year. Our facility was open for 10 hours every day. At the midpoint of the year, we intervened with an online appointment scheduling tool. The pre-intervention period was June – Nov 2015 and the post-intervention period was Jan – June 2016. The variance was compared between pre- and post-intervention periods using robust tests for equality of variances and medians were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

 

Results

There were a total of 6,804 visits in the pre-intervention period and 7,396 arrivals in the post-intervention period. 37.5% of patients seen at urgent care made an appointment through our online scheduler in the post-intervention period. The overall variance in the number of patients seen per hour was reduced by 3.7% after our intervention (p<0.01). We also observed a reduction in the proportion of the total patients who arrived in the first hour from a median of 20% [IQR: 15% - 24%] to 17% [14% - 22%] of total daily volume (p<0.005). Median arrival to bed time was reduced from 10 [3 - 34] to 9 [4 -24] minutes (p<0.01), and median arrival to doctor time was reduced from 28 [12 – 56] to 25 [12 – 44] minutes (p<0.001). Both arrival to bed and arrival to doctor times had reduced variance after our intervention, 35.5% and 27.3% respectively (both p<0.001). We also observed significant reductions in the percentage of patients waiting to be roomed in the first 15 minutes (p<0.001) and in the percentage of patients who had to wait longer than 30 minutes to be seen by a doctor (p<0.001).

 

Conclusion

The implementation of an online appointment scheduling system at urgent care can reduce the variation in patient arrival time, particularly during the first hour, and time between arrival to bed, and to doctor. Our intervention also led to significant reductions in the number of patients waiting to be seen and roomed. Although there is only a 3.75% reduction in variance in overall number of patients seen per hour, this observation follows a well-studied concept in the modeling of queuing systems; small reductions in variance can significantly improve flow through a system. 


Ayobami OLUFADEJI (Boston, USA), Joshua JOSEPH, Anne GROSSESTREUER, Leon, D SANCHEZ
14:10 - 15:40 #14660 - FP048 Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room: a prospective observational study.
FP048 Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room: a prospective observational study.

Background  Diagnostic errors are frequent and have severe consequences. Most studies of the subjects however analyze cases of error only, making it difficult to identify case characteristics unique to diagnostic error. Our objective was to determine the rate of diagnostic error in patients hospitalized through the emergency room, identify factors predicting such errors, and their consequences.

Methods We collected data through a prospective observational study in one university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. Patients’ hospital discharge diagnosis was compared with the diagnosis at hospital admittance through the emergency room and classified as similar or different according to a predefined scheme by two independent expert raters. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to determine whether characteristics of patients, diagnosing physicians, and context predicted diagnostic error. We further assessed in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and diagnostic error, defined as discrepancy between primary admittance and discharge diagnoses.

Results 755 consecutive patients were included, diagnostic error identified in 12.3% of cases. Diagnostic error was associated with a longer hospital stay (mean 10.29 vs. 6.90 days; P=0.038; odds ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.76) and increased patient mortality (8 (8.60%) vs. 25(3.78%); P=0.007; odds ratio 3.94; 1.46 to 10.60) as compared to no error. A factor available at admittance that predicted diagnostic error was the diagnosing physician’s assessment that the patient presented atypically for the diagnosis assigned (P<0.001;  odds ratio 2.71; 1.51 to 4.86).

Conclusions Discrepancies between the emergency room admittance diagnosis and the hospital discharge diagnosis occur in every ninth patient and are associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Diagnostic errors are not readily predictable by fixed patient or physician characteristics but seem to depend on context.


Thomas C SAUTER (Bern, Switzerland), Stefanie C HAUTZ, Juliana E. KAEMMER, Laura ZWAAN, Stefan K SCHAUBER, Aristomenis EXADAKTYLOS, Tanja BIRRENBACH, Volker MAIER, Wolf E HAUTZ
14:10 - 15:40 #14897 - FP049 Patients who leave without being seen. Presenting complaints and length of stay – who leaves when?
FP049 Patients who leave without being seen. Presenting complaints and length of stay – who leaves when?

Patients who leave without being seen. Presenting complaints and length of stay – who leaves when?

Background: Patients visit emergency departments (ED) for various reasons. Some leave, before being seen by a doctor (left without being seen, LWBS). The rate can be as high as 10% [1]. Numbers in Germany are lower [2]. A large Canadian study showed, that patients LWBS are low-risk for short-term complications [3]. The present study looks at presenting complaints and length of time until patients leave the ED.

Methods: The study reviewed all patients who LWBS in a single-centre ED of a teaching-hospital for a period of one year (January – December 2017). LWBS cases were compared with the total number of ED presentations. For LWBS cases were further analysed for triage category according to Manchester Triage System (MTS) and length of stay as well as presenting complaints according to the Canadian Emergency Department Information Systems (CEDIS) Code [4].

Results:

38,614 patients presented in 2017 of which 1,027 patients LWBS (2.66%). 185 patients left before triage, 1 was in the red MTS category, 3 in the orange, 56 in the yellow, 647 in the green and 135 in the blue category. Median time until patients left were 171 minutes. The top five presenting complaints according to CEDIS were pain of the upper or lower extremities, abdominal pain, back pain, and injury of the upper extremity.

Discussion & Conclusions:

We present first data on patients that LWBS from Germany for a period of one year. Compared to international data, fewer patients leave our ED without being seen. The number of LWBS patients can be a quality indicator and should be monitored regularly. Of LWBS patients, the majority was triaged in the lower urgency categories. We conclude that monitoring of LWBS patients can provide valuable data on ED performance. While not all patients are patient enough to wait to be seen by a doctor our data suggest that most of these patients present with non-urgent complaints that can be treated in an outpatient setting without experiencing adverse events. This study did not receive any specific funding.

References: 1. Fayyaz J, Khursheed M, Mir MU, Mehmood A (2013) BMC Emerg Med.;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-1

2. Harding U (2014) Anästh Intensivmed; 55:S10

3. Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA (2011) BMJ;342:d2983

4. Greiner F, Brammen D, Kulla M, Walcher F, Erdmann B (2018) Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Mar;113(2):115-123



This study did not receive any specific funding.
Ulf DR HARDING (Wolfsburg, Germany), Bernadett DR ERDMANN
14:10 - 15:40 #14943 - FP050 Emergency department overcrowding: Swiss application of the Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN).
FP050 Emergency department overcrowding: Swiss application of the Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN).

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is associated with increased waiting time, reduced patient satisfaction and decreased quality of care. Numerous validated scores are available to assess ED overcrowding. The Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN) is the most established score quantifying the ED overcrowding. To our knowledge, there is no reported application of the EDWIN in a Swiss ED. Therefore, we assessed the applicability of the EDWIN in a Swiss ED and investigated further predictors for ED overcrowding.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we enrolled consecutively ED visits of a tertiary care hospital from December 1st-31st, 2016. The EDWIN combines the number of patients per triage level, number of emergency physicians, available treatment beds and patients waiting for in-house admission. The EDWIN was scaled from 0 to 1.5 as “active but manageable”, between 1.5 to 2.0 as “very busy but not overcrowded” and >2 as “extremely busy and severely overcrowded”. The median EDWIN per hour was defined as the first endpoint.  To investigate predictors for overcrowding we grouped the ED visits with an EDWIN ≤2 as not overcrowded and >2 as overcrowded and performed multivariable regression analysis.

Results: During December 2016, we calculated the EDWIN at every full hour, for 24 hours and during 31 days, in summary 744 EDWIN calculations were performed. The mean EDWIN per hour was 1.2 (standard deviation (SD) 0.6). In 527 calculations (70.8%), the EDWIN was active, 135 calculations (18.2%) showed a very busy ED and in 82 observations (11%), the ED severely overcrowded. In average, the ED was severely overcrowded 2.6 times per day. The highest EDWIN was reported on Saturdays (mean 1.6 (SD 0.8)) and Sundays (mean 1.3 (SD 0.8). During weekends, overcrowding was from 10 pm to 04 am, EDWIN ranged from 2.1 - 2.3. During the week the mean EDWIN ranged from 1.0 - 1.2. The reduced number of emergency physicians during night shifts (p<0.001), increased number of patients in the ED treatment area (p<0.001), patients waiting for referral to the ward (p<0.001), weekend periods (p<0.001) and the number of isolated ED patients due to infections (p=0.002) had a highly significant association with overcrowding. In case of overcrowding, the waiting time was prolonged (p=0.001)

Discussion & Conclusion: The EDWIN was easily applicable in a tertiary care Swiss ED, objectively displayed severely overcrowding during the weekend nights and was strongly associated with the number of available emergency shift physicians, number of patients in the ED treatment area, patients waiting for referral to the ward, weekend periods and the number of isolations. To leverage the ED overcrowding in future, the two most important steps are to increase the number of emergency physicians during night shifts and to optimize the referral time to the ward which is hospital dependent.



No trial registration because no patient data were involved. This study did not receive any specific funding. Ethical approval: not needed
Aline HERZOG (Zürich, Switzerland), Dr Ksenija SLANKAMENAC, Dagmar I. KELLER
14:10 - 15:40 #15035 - FP051 Are patients ‘on the doorstep’ of emergency departments more likely to use them for non-urgent visits: An observational study.
FP051 Are patients ‘on the doorstep’ of emergency departments more likely to use them for non-urgent visits: An observational study.

Background

There is a lack of evidence on how travel distances and geography impact emergency department (ED) attendances, particularly non-urgent ED visits.  We investigated the impact of patient journey time to the ED on the probability of patients using the ED for non-urgent care that could have been provided elsewhere, such as in a primary care type setting.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective analysis of three years of Hospital Episode and Statistics Accident Emergency (HES A&E) data for one large region in England (April 1st 2011 to March 31st 2014).  Data was collected on all adult (>15 years) ED attendances in the region.  Patient journey time (in minutes) to ED was measured using Department of Transport data as the time to the nearest ED from the centre of the lower super output area (LSOA) that the patient resided in.

The relationship between non-urgent ED attendances and journey time to the ED was analysed initially and also examined by age categories (16-44, 45-74 years and 75+), time period of arrival (in hours versus out of hours; in hours defined as 08.00 to 18.00 Mon-Fri), arrival mode (self-referred versus ambulance) and geography (urban LSOAs versus rural LSOAs).   

We also modelled the impact of journey time to the ED on the odds of an attendance being non urgent, controlling for age and socioeconomic status using multi-variate logistic regression.  A validated process based definition of non-urgent ED attendance was refined for this study and applied to the data.  

Results

There were 3,667,601 first time attendances to EDs, of which 554,564 were defined as non-urgent (15.1%). Rates of non-urgent attendances fell with longer journey times to ED.  Patients within a one-minute journey time of the ED had a probability of a non-urgent attendance of around 22% compared with 11% if they resided 20 minutes away.  If a patient self-referred to ED, the rate of non-urgent attendance for those residing less than one minute was around 29%.   

The relationship between shorter journey times and higher rates of non-urgent attendance was more significant in younger age categories.  This age effect was particularly evident in non-urgent attendances arriving by ambulance.  A stronger relationship between journey time and non-urgent attendance also appeared between 18.00 and 08.00 at both the weekday and the weekend.

Multi-variate analysis showed the odds of a non-urgent attendance decreased significantly with increasing journey time to the ED.  For every minute further away from the ED the odds of a non-urgent attendance decreased by 2.5% (odds ratio: 0.976, 95% CI:0.976, 0.976); by 2% (OR= 0.981, 95% CI:0.980-0.982) for self-referred non-urgent attendances and 3% (OR= 0.973, 95% CI:0.972-0.974) for ambulance non-urgent attendances. 

Discussion and conclusions

Patient journey time is a significant factor in non-urgent use of the ED. There is evidence that patients ‘on the doorstep’ of an ED are using them for primary care type presentations.  Alternatives to the ED such as urgent care centres may need to be located near areas of high ED use.

 



No trial registration required as a non clinical study using routine data sources. Funding information: The research was funded by the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber. www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk NIHR CLAHRC YH Grant number IS-CLA-0113-10020
Colin O'KEEFFE (Sheffield, United Kingdom), Suzanne MASON, Susan CROFT, Rebecca SIMPSON, Richard JACQUES
14:10 - 15:40 #15212 - FP052 Analysis of the distribution of time that different cohorts of patients spend in Emergency Departments. Studying the potential impact of applying the 4 hour standard to urgent health problems only.
FP052 Analysis of the distribution of time that different cohorts of patients spend in Emergency Departments. Studying the potential impact of applying the 4 hour standard to urgent health problems only.

Background:

The NHS plan in 2000 stated that “by 2004 no one should be waiting more than four hours in Accident and Emergency from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge”.  This has become known as the four hour standard, with the target reduced to 98% in 2005 and 95% in 2010. 

More recently, performance has fallen dramatically, with proportion of patients achieving the standard 84.6% in March 2018 (76.4% for type 1 EDs).  In January 2017, Jeremy Hunt announced that the target would in future only apply to “urgent health problems” although there have been no further announcements on how this patient group would be defined or further implementations plans.

Aims: To identify how time spent in the Emergency Department (ED) varies for different cohorts of patients, those with urgent and non-urgent problems.

Methods:

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data for ED attendances across 18 EDs in Yorkshire and Humber from April 2011-March 2014 were retrospectively analysed.  Patients were divided into the following cohorts: non-urgent (patients retrospectively identified as first attendance, no investigations, treatments or referral that required type 1 ED facilities), urgent not admitted, urgent admitted. Total time in ED from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge was calculated for each cohort.

Results:

There were 3,736,541 ED attendances during the period studied.  Of these 565,687 (15.1%) were categorised as non-urgent, 1,163,014 (31.1%) were urgent admitted and 2,007,840 (53.7%) were urgent not admitted. 

The four hour standard was achieved for 98.5% of the non-urgent patients, 96.5% of the urgent not admitted patients and 84.4% of the urgent admitted patients.    The distribution of total time in ED was markedly different for each gorup - the median time in ED was 96 (IQR 54-148) minutes for the non-urgent patients, 130 (IQR 82-185) minutes for the urgent not admitted patients and 209 (IQR 149-237) minutes for the urgent admitted patients.  28.2% of the urgent admitted patients were admitted between 220-240 minutes, compared to 8.9% of the urgent not admitted patients and 3.7% of the non-urgent patients.

Discussion:

Our work demonstrates that there are markedly different distributions for time spent in ED for the three different groups of patients that we have identified. The large spike in time spent in the department just prior to four hours, that has been consistently reported with UK ED attendances, is most apparent for patients with urgent conditions being admitted to hospital. This data demonstrates that the main challenges for departments with regard to the four hour standard is for the sickest patients, the urgent admitted patients.  This may be due to a combination of late decisions by ED clinicians, issues transferring patients and inpatient bed availability.

The non-urgent attenders (who arguably did not need to attend the ED) left the department well within four hours.  This may be a perverse incentive of the four hour standard being applied to all ED patients and may be driving ED demand.   

Based on our data, taking non-urgent patients out of the reported target would not improve compliance with the target.



No trial registration required as a non clinical study using routine data sources. The research was funded by the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber. www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk NIHR CLAHRC YH Grant number IS-CLA-0113-10020.
Susan CROFT (Sheffield, United Kingdom), Rebecca SIMPSON, Suzanne MASON, Colin O'KEEFE, Richard JACQUES
14:10 - 15:40 #15398 - FP053 Bad manners in the Emergency Department: A survey among physicians.
FP053 Bad manners in the Emergency Department: A survey among physicians.

Background: 

Negative workplace behavior, especially negative communication is a recognized problem in many organizations and is known to have serious impacts on workplace performance, productivity and personal wellbeing. Emergency Departments (ED) can be high stress environments in which communication and perceptions of respect between physicians and other staff may underlie individual functioning. We conducted a study to estimate the influence of incivility (ICV) among physicians in the ED.

Methods :

We assessed workplace incivility in the ED with an online survey. We focused on frequency, origin, reasons and situations where ICV was reported. To measure the levels and the potential influence of ICV on psychological safety, social stress and personal wellbeing we correlated our questionnaire to standard psychological scales. Statistical analysis included Students t-test, chi squared distribution and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results:

We invited all seventy-seven ED physicians to participate in our survey. Among those that completed (n=50, 65%) the survey, 9% of ED physicians reported frequent (1/week) and 38% occasional (1/month) incidents of ICV. 28% of physicians reported experiencing ICV once per quarter and 21% reported a frequency of only once per year, no physician reported ICV on a daily basis (Fig. 1). Levels of ICV were significantly higher in interactions with specialists from outside then within the ED (p<0.01) (Fig. 2). ICV from nonsurgical specialties was higher than  from surgical (Fig. 3). Our findings showed a significant correlation between internal (within the ED team) ICV and psychological safety. To ED physicians internal ICV was associated with lower levels of psychological safety (p<0.01). ICV displayed from sources outside the ED team was not associated with psychological safety, but we found a significant influence of external ICV on personal irritability and reduced wellbeing (p<0.01).

Discussion & Conclusion:

The incidence of incivility was high among the ED physicians. Although this was a small sample, the association between workplace ICV and psychological safety, personal irritation as well personal comfort suggests that ICV may be an important variable underlying ED team performance. These findings further underscore the need to foster a culture of respect and good communication between departments, as levels of ICV were highest with physicians from outside the ED. Future research would benefit from examining strategies to prevent and reduce ICV and identify reasons for personal variation in perception of ICV. During critical situations and in general collaboration with specialists, awareness of ICV and countermeasures are important to avoid decreased performance and negative impact on staff and patient.


Karsten KLINGBERG, David SRIVASTAVA (Bern, Switzerland)
14:10 - 15:40 #15668 - FP054 Emergency Department closure – the effect on local populations and emergency health services. Findings from the ‘closED’ study.
FP054 Emergency Department closure – the effect on local populations and emergency health services. Findings from the ‘closED’ study.

Background

In recent years a number of Emergency Departments (EDs) have closed, or been replaced by another facility such as an Urgent Care Centre. With further re-organisation of EDs expected, the ‘closED’ study aimed to provide research evidence to inform the public, NHS, and policymakers when considering local closures. Our study objective was to understand the impact of ED closure/downgrade on populations and emergency care providers, the first study to do so in England.

 

Methods

We undertook a controlled interrupted time series of monthly data assessing changes in the patterns of mortality in local populations, and changes in local emergency care service activity and performance, following the closure of Type 1 EDs in England. Data was sourced from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), Hospital Episode Statistics A&E, Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care, and Ambulance service computer-assisted dispatch (CAD) records.

 

The resident catchment populations of five EDs which closed between 2009 and 2011 (Newark, Hemel Hempstead, Bishop Auckland, Hartlepool, Rochdale) were selected for analysis. Five control areas were also selected.

 

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measures were ambulance service incident volumes and times, emergency and urgent care attendances at ED, emergency hospital admissions, mortality, and case fatality ratios.

 

Results

There was significant heterogeneity in the results for most of the outcome measures between sites, but the overall findings were:  evidence of an increase on average in total incidents attended by ambulance following 999 calls, and those categorised as potentially serious emergency incidents; no statistically reliable evidence of changes  in attendance at Emergency or Urgent Care services, or emergency hospital admissions; no statistically reliable evidence of any change in the number of deaths from a set of emergency conditions following the ED closure in any site, though on average there was a small increase in an indicator of the ‘risk of death’ in the closure sites when compared to the control areas.

 

Implications

In the five areas studied taken together, there was no statistically reliable evidence that the re-organisation of emergency care was associated with an increase in population mortality. This suggests that any negative effects caused by increased journey time to ED can be offset by other factors. For example, if other new services are introduced and care is more effective than it used to be, or if the care received at the now nearest hospital is more effective than that provided at the hospital where the ED closed. However, there may be implications of re-organisation for NHS emergency care providers, with ambulance services appearing to experience a greater burden.



NIHR (Health Services and Delivery Research programme)
Emma KNOWLES, Pr Suzanne MASON (Sheffield, United Kingdom), Neil SHEPHARD, Tony STONE, Lindsey BISHOP-EDWARDS, Jon NICHOLL, Enid HIRST, Linda ABOUZEID

15:40 - 16:10 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
16:10
16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A24
PULMONARY
Assessing and treating respiratory failure

PULMONARY
Assessing and treating respiratory failure

Moderators: Helen ASKITOPOULOU (Chair Ethics Committee) (Heraklion, Greece), Pr Christian BACKER-MOGENSEN (Professor) (Aabenraa, Denmark)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
16:10 - 17:40 Risk stratification in CAP - more than CRB-65 or qSOFA. Pr Jim DUCHARME (Immediate Past President) (Speaker, Mississauga, Canada)
16:10 - 17:40 Detection of patient-ventilator asynchrony by waveform analysis during NIV in the emergency room. Is it feasible? is it useful? Paolo GROFF (Director) (Speaker, Perugia, Italy)
16:10 - 17:40 Invasive ventilation - lung protection necessary in the ED? Helen ASKITOPOULOU (Chair Ethics Committee) (Speaker, Heraklion, Greece)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B24
PRE-HOSPITAL
ED to PHC and back again

PRE-HOSPITAL
ED to PHC and back again

Moderators: Andreas KRUGER (Norway), Dr Jana SEBLOVA (Emergency Physician) (PRAGUE, Czech Republic)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
16:10 - 17:40 Invasive approach to pre-hospital CPR: stay and play, or scoop and run to cathlab? Ondrej FRANEK (Speaker, Czech Republic)
16:10 - 17:40 Advanced Airway Management. Alex KOTTMANN (MD, PhD Candidate) (Speaker, Stavanger, Norway)
16:10 - 17:40 Improving a mature pre-hospital critical care system: implementing a national HEMS network. Leif ROGNAS (HEMS Consultant) (Speaker, Aarhus, Denmark, Denmark)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D24
Don't miss this!
YEMD Session

Don't miss this!
YEMD Session

Moderators: Rok PETROVCIC (Resident) (Maribor, Slovenia), Rachel STEWART (Female) (London, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Ethylen Glycol in Pregnancy. Dr Dinka LULIC (Consultant in emergency medicine) (Speaker, Zagreb, Croatia)
16:10 - 17:40 More than meets the eye. Tom MALYSCH (Speaker, Werder (Havel), Germany)
16:10 - 17:40 Is she telling the truth? Sexual assault. Wilma BERGSTRÖM (medical student, ER nurse) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E24
PAEDIATRICS
Cases you cannot miss - YOU are the PEM physician

PAEDIATRICS
Cases you cannot miss - YOU are the PEM physician
Interactive Session

16:10 - 17:10 Choose Your Own PEM Adventure / interactive case-based. Dani HALL (PEM Consultant) (Speaker, Dublin, Ireland), Rachael MITCHELL (Speaker, United Kingdom), Sarah DAVIES (Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
17:10 - 17:40 Case-based on PEM toxicology. Santiago MINTEGI (Section Head. Pediatric Emergency Department) (Speaker, Bilbao, Spain)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C24
GERIATRIC
Update on current geriatric EM issues

GERIATRIC
Update on current geriatric EM issues

Moderators: Pr Simon CONROY (Prof.) (Leicester, United Kingdom), Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Haarlem, The Netherlands)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
16:10 - 17:40 Delirium 3.0. Jacinta A. LUCKE (Emergency Phycisian) (Speaker, Haarlem, The Netherlands)
16:10 - 17:40 Admission is not the only option. Graham ELLIS (Speaker, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Chest Pain in Older Adults. Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Manchester)
16:10 - 17:40 Approach to falls: Emergency perspective versus geriatric perspective. Roland BINGISSER (Speaker, Basel, Switzerland), Pr Simon CONROY (Prof.) (Speaker, Leicester, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Urosepsis. Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F24
FREE PAPER 7
Education & Training / Misc

FREE PAPER 7
Education & Training / Misc

Moderators: Nikolas SBYRAKIS (Consultant Emergency Physician) (Heraklion, Greece), Anna SPITERI (Consultant) (Malta, Malta)
16:10 - 17:40 #15288 - FP055 Experience of a blended learning paradigm in teaching benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) -a randomized controlled trial.
FP055 Experience of a blended learning paradigm in teaching benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) -a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND 

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common emergency presentation that requires specific knowledge and skills for the emergency physician. The traditional face-to-face (F2F) teaching of BPPV often entails significant time for both the teachers and learners. Blended learning (BL) has become a common teaching approach in graduate medical education with its advantages of reduced time and comparable efficacy, but has not been tested in the context of BPPV teaching to Emergency Medicine Residents (EMR). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether a BL approach would prove more effective than a F2F approach in the EMR education on the management of BPPV. The secondary aim was to gauge the resident opinion of each educational approach.

METHODOLOGY     

38 EMRs residents in the study were randomly allocated to either F2F or BL approach. They were all assessed before and after implementation of BPPV education.  Skills acquisition was measured through the performance of Dix-Hallpike maneuver (DH) and Canalith reposition maneuver (CR), rated 0 (worst) through 5 (perfect) by raters blinded to the study groups. Medical knowledge was assessed through a written examination comprising 20 multiple-choice questions (MCQs). A validated electronic questionnaire was sent to all study participants to assess their perceptions and self-perceived competence of BPPV with each educational approach.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the residents in the two study groups were similar. In both the F2F and the BL groups, there was clear improvement in the post-intervention scores in BPPV skills and medical knowledge. The DH and CR evaluations of BPPV skills showed a median difference of 0 (95% CI, -1 to 1). For MCQ, the mean improvement seen in F2F group was 0.1 higher than that of than seen in BL but the 95% CI (-1.2 to 1.4) crossed the null value. More residents preferred F2F approach over BL approach for teachings of BPPV.

CONCLUSION

The study results showed significant improvements in the medical knowledge and skills acquisition of BPPV with both F2F and BL education approaches.   Although the improvements were virtually identical, more residents favored the F2F approach over BL approach for learning BPPV.



NA
Khalid BASHIR (Aberystwyth, Qatar), Kaleelullah Saleem FAROOK, Aftab Mohammad O. K. AZAD, Anjum SHAHZAD, Prof. Thomas STEPHEN
16:10 - 17:40 #15367 - FP056 Social media platform facilitate networking and collaboration between domestic and international emergency medicine residents.
FP056 Social media platform facilitate networking and collaboration between domestic and international emergency medicine residents.

Background:

Shift work and disperse training location hinder emergency medicine (EM) residents networking, collaboration and resources sharing. In small country with small-scale EM residents training program, the challenge become more serious. In Taiwan, there are 97 first year EM residents in 39 training programs in 2016. Twenty-five programs have 2 or 3 new residents every year. Domestic and international networking is a critical issue to deal with. Emergency Medicine Resident Network (EMRN) was created to enhance resources sharing, networking between domestic and international EM residents by on-line and off-line activities. Its mission is to achieve EM residents excellence through diversity and collaboration.

 

Methods:

EMRN was launched in December 5, 2015 as a Facebook group platform. Daily sharing on EM topics by members are the core activity. Online theme experience sharing is hold annually. Diverse offline activities were host to facilitate networking. Resident lecture competition enhances the ability of precise, efficient communication skills. Video recording interview with EM physicians during medical conferences on EM related topics and broadcast on social media. Outreaching to international EM residents’ associations for idea and experience exchange. EMRN is currently operated by three attending physicians and four resident volunteers from three hospitals.

 

Results:

EMRN Facebook group has 2512 members from 28 countries including Taiwan, Hong Kong, United States, Malaysia, and Macau. There are 1617 posts, 2727 comments, and 41950 likes in the past two years. Two online theme sharing activities on topics of advises to young EM attending physicians and advices to first-year EM residents were hold in 2016 and 2017. More than 50 senior EM physicians shared their thoughts and experience. The content was collected into two e-handbooks after activities and been downloaded for more than 500 times. The first Taiwan EM residents lecture competition was hold in the 2017 Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine (TSEM) Annual Conference and will be hold regularly in future TSEM Annual Conference. The first EMRN interview was host during 2016 ACEP SA with the President of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Association Dr. Alicia Kurtz at Las Vegas. The second EMRN interviews were host during 2017 ACEP SA and 17 emergency physicians from Taiwan and Hong Kong were interviewed at Washington DC.

 In February 2017, the idea and experience of EMRN was shared in the Hong Kong College of Emergency Medicine (HKCEM) Private Chapter meeting. This event bridged the connection between EMRN and HKCEM Young Fellows’ Chapter which lead to the first Hong Kong and Taiwan EM Residents Forum schedule be host in 2018 TSEM Annual Conference.

Discussion & Conclusions:

Networking, collaboration and resources sharing are key elements in residents training. EMRN facilitate the process by hosting on-line and off-line activities through social media platform. EMRN provide a model, especially for small-scale EM residents training programs, to connect domestic and international residents regardless of official or financial support.


Ching-Hsing LEE (Taipei, Taiwan), Chen-Mei HSU, Hao-Yang LIN, Shao-Feng LIAO, Cheng-Heng LIU
16:10 - 17:40 #15683 - FP057 Using high fidelity simulation to compare residents’ crisis resource management skills in a high vs a low-resource scenario during the resuscitation of a critically ill obstetric patient: a pilot experimental study.
FP057 Using high fidelity simulation to compare residents’ crisis resource management skills in a high vs a low-resource scenario during the resuscitation of a critically ill obstetric patient: a pilot experimental study.

INTRODUCTION

After the recent Ebola outbreak response in West Africa, the World Health Organization undertook an internal reform to improve the global health emergency workforce. However, while the presence of young doctors in humanitarian missions is increasing, most of them lack formal training before deployment. As studies reporting on the preparedness of health providers in low-resource settings remain predominantly narrative, the aim of this paper was to compare residents’ performance in a simulated high-resource vs a low-resource environment.

METHODS

This was a prospective study with a crossover design. Ten senior residents in Anaesthesia acted as lead physicians during the management of two identical postpartum haemorrhages in a high-resource scenario (HRS), which mirrored the operating theater (OT) of our tertiary teaching hospital, and in a low-resource scenario (LRS) that reflected an OT in a developing country equipped according to the basic international standards of anesthesia. Participants had no prior simulation experience, had never received training in crisis resource management and had no previous experience in humanitarian missions. The study was conducted over two days in April 2017; residents were randomly allocated into two intervention groups using assignment envelops. On the first day, five residents were exposed to HRS and then to LRS, while on the second day, the remaining five residents began first with LRS and followed with HRS. Before entering the study scenarios, residents attended a seminar on the management of postpartum hemorrhage and a simulation tutorial where the functioning of the simulation setting was presented. Participants were allowed a 15 minutes familiarisation with the final setting (without the patient) in both scenarios. The mannequin NOELLE® (S550 Maternal Simulator) was used in both cases and was operated by a simulator technician. All actors were trained to standardise their performances and give pre-established responses to resident’s actions or inactions.The coordination of actors to standardise responses was performed by another simulation instructor through a handheld radio. The scenario was based on a real-life case and the sequence of events and cues were reviewed for realism and timing by two experts anaesthesists with valuable experience in humanitarian missions with the international organization Médecins Sans Frontières. Both scenarios were played for a maximum of 20 minutes and before each, residents received a situational report with a detailed explanation of the context. The progression of all Residents’ performances was videotaped and their crisis-resource management skills rated by an external and independent evaluator using the validated Italian translation of the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Residents’ overall performance decreased in LRS (P< 0.05). Residents also displayed reduced leadership, problem solving, situational awareness, resource utilisation and communication skills (P< 0.05) in LRS compared to HRS.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that senior residents’ resource management skills decrease when managing a critically-ill patient in a simulated low-resource scenario when compared to their usual workplace. Therefore, attention should be drawn to the potential implications that deploying unexperienced and untrained doctors in the field may have on the health of local populations.

 

 

 



None
Alba RIPOLL GALLARDO (Milan, Italy), Grazia MENEGHETTI, Jeffrey Michael FRANC, Luca RAGAZZONI, Francesco DELLA CORTE
16:10 - 17:40 #15893 - FP058 Investigating the Effect of Emergency Medicine Internship on Vocational Anxiety and Depression in Sixth Grade Students of the Medical Faculty.
FP058 Investigating the Effect of Emergency Medicine Internship on Vocational Anxiety and Depression in Sixth Grade Students of the Medical Faculty.

Background: The medical faculty sixth grade studentship or the commonly used term internship and residency are the real preparation period for the medical profession. In the emergency medicine internship, students personally taking care of a patient for the first time, share the responsibility with EM assistants at the diagnosis and treatment stage of the disease.This situation can lead to anxiety and depression in physician candidates. The present study is the first study to investigate depression, anxiety, and stress levels of sixth-grade medical students before and after the EM internship.

Methods: This study was prospectively conducted on the medical faculty sixth grade students receiving EM internship between October 15, 2015, and June 01, 2016. The students were subjected to Beck depression, Beck anxiety, and DASS-42 tests on the first and last days of EM internship, and anxiety, depression, and stress scores were determined. The participants who accepted to be enrolled in the study were taken to a private room in the emergency department and the survey forms were completed with a face-to-face interview.

Results: 131 sixth-grade medical students who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The mean Beck depression score was 10.15±6.11 on the first day of internship and 6.37±4.79 on the last day of internship. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mean Beck anxiety score was 9.02±7.25 on the first day of internship and 4.69±4.85 on the last day of internship. The difference in Beck Anxiety score was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mean DASS-42 scores were 23.91±14.35 on the first day and 15.31±12.13 on the last day. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05)

Discussion & Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate depression, anxiety, and stress levels of the medical faculty sixth grade students before and after EM internship. Sixth-grade medical students showed high scores on stress, anxiety, and depression scales before the EM internship, which is due to various reasons including changing social environment, physical environment, emotional state and change of mental–biological functions. The last day scores are decreased as a result of elimination of many factors that we think as a reason of this situation and by experiencing the good aspects of working in emergency departments.However, as many causative factors disappear at the end of the internship and also as they experience the benefits of the EM internship, these scores drop on the last day of the internship. 


Abdullah Osman KOCAK, Meryem KOCAK BETOS, Zeynep CAKIR (ISTANBUL, Turkey), Ilker AKBAS, Burak KATIPOĞLU
16:10 - 17:40 #14620 - FP059 Violence in the Emergency Department; A two Centre staff survey.
FP059 Violence in the Emergency Department; A two Centre staff survey.

Violence in the Emergency Department; A two Centre staff survey.

 

Background:

Violence in the Emergency Department is a common and well documented occurrence; however, little is known about the frequency of exposure and impact of violence on medical, nursing and allied health staff.

 

Objectives:

To examine prevalence and impact of violence in the Emergency Department on staff in two high turnover hospitals within Monash emergency medicine network, Casey and Dandenong Hospitals.

 

Method:

During two separate periods, of two-week duration: between 15.8.2016 - 28.8.2016 and 20.2.17 - 5.3.17, surveys were distributed to all staff of each Centre’s Emergency Department and were requested to complete them at the end of every shift.

Participants were asked to identify themselves by their shift time, the area of the department they were working in, and their role in the department.

They were then asked to record if and how many times they were abused, whether there was verbal abuse, physical violence and likely drug or alcohol intoxication.

The last section of the survey left room for staff to report if they had been physically or emotionally harmed and if they had provided any formal or informal reporting of the event.

Space was made for people to leave free text at the bottom of the document.

 

Results:

Responses were received from 214 staff at one site and 127 at the other. Of those, 127/362 (35%) of staff reported at least on incident of physical or verbal abuse during their shift, for a total of 234 incidents. Physical abuse made up 10% of all incidents of abuse, however there were only 2 reported incidents of harm, conversely, 44% of people reported being emotionally affected.

 

11% of events were perpetuated by someone accompanying the patients, and 40% of all events were felt by the reporting staff member to likely involve alcohol or other drugs.

 

Conclusion:

Physical and verbal abuse is a common experience amongst Emergency Department staff. Fortunately, physical harm appears to be quite rare, however care must be taken to look after the physical and mental well-being of all staff members.

 


Dr Pourya POURYAHYA (Melbourne, Australia), Alastair MEYER
16:10 - 17:40 #15019 - FP060 Attitudes and Knowledge of Healthcare Professionals Regarding Organ Donation. A Survey of the Saolta University Health Care Group.
FP060 Attitudes and Knowledge of Healthcare Professionals Regarding Organ Donation. A Survey of the Saolta University Health Care Group.

INTRODUCTION

Organ transplantation has become the most effective treatment for those patients with end-stage organ failure. Despite such advancements there is a chronic imbalance between the supply and demand for organs both nationally and internationally. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play an important role in the organ donation process, including identification and referral of potential donors. They also are involved in management of potential donors, engaging donor families and acquiring consent. The attitudes and knowledge of HPCs towards organ donation is important as some studies have suggested that HCPs can positively influence families of potential donors. Therefore the purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes and level of knowledge of HCPs regarding organ donation in the Saolta University Health Care Group comprising 6 hospitals in the West of Ireland.  

 

METHODS

An online anonymous self-administered questionnaire containing 40 questions on organ donation using Google Forms was created. The survey was distributed to HCPs in acute care, working in the Saolta University Health Care Group. This study was conducted over a 4 week period in October 2017. The survey consisted of 40 questions divided into 3 categories: seven questions on demographic details, ten questions on attitudes of HCPs towards organ donation and twenty three questions on knowledge of HCPs regarding organ donation. The survey was distributed via email and was sent on 2 subsequent occasions to encourage better response rates.

 

RESULTS

A hundred and thirty-nine responses were received giving a response rate of 11.8%. There was a female preponderance of 63%. Over 50% of HCPs were above the age of 30. Eighty six per cent were doctors (120), while only 14% (19) were nurses. HCPs willingness to donate their organs was at 93% compared to 97% willing to receive a transplant. The majority (81%) of HCPs were in support of changing the law, so that everyone is an organ donor unless they opt-out or their families decline. More HCPs understood or had knowledge of the term donation after brain death (64%) than donation after circulatory death (49%). HCPs working in intensive care knew more about the management of brain dead donors than other specialties (p<0.0001). Over 60% of HCPs when asked either disagreed or strongly disagreed with the adequacy of training in organ donation and transplant.

 

CONCLUSION 

Overall, HCPs surveyed had positive attitudes towards organ donation but there was a lack of knowledge particularly among non-intensive care professionals. This study highlights the need to increase awareness along with implementation of educational programmes among HCPs regarding organ donation and transplant.


Etimbuk UMANA (Belfast, Ireland), Pauline MAY, Areej MOHAMED, Orna GRANT, Emer CURRAN, John O'DONNELL
16:10 - 17:40 #15723 - FP061 Teenage Hydrocodone Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers.
FP061 Teenage Hydrocodone Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers.

Background:  According to the Drug Enforcement Administration, over 136 million hydrocodone prescriptions were dispensed in 2013, with approximately 24.4 million people over the age of 12 years using it for non-medical purposes. The non-medical use of hydrocodone among teenagers is common, with the National Institute on Drug Abuse reporting the past year use of Vicodin (hydrocodone/acetaminophen) among this population being 1 - 5%. According to the Monitoring the Future survey, the annual prevalence rates of Vicodin use were  0.7%, 1.5%, and 2.0% for 8th, 10th and 12th graders respectively. This study examines the trends in hydrocodone exposures among teenagers reported to U.S. poison centers (PCs).

Methods: The National Poison Data System (NPDS) was queried for all hydrocodone exposures in patients between 13 and 19 years from 2011 to 2017. We descriptively assessed the demographic and clinical characteristics. Trends in hydrocodone frequencies and rates (per 100,000 teenage exposures) were analyzed using Poisson regression. Percent changes from the first year of the study were reported with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: There were 18,097 teenage exposures to hydrocodone reported to the PCs from 2011 to 2017, with the number of calls decreasing from 3,051 to 2,167 during the study period. Among the overall hydrocodone calls, the proportion of calls from acute care hospitals and EDs increased from 55.2% to 71.6% from 2011 to 2017. Multiple substance hydrocodone exposures accounted for 55.8% of the overall calls and 73% of the calls from acute care hospitals and EDs. Approximately 13.8% of the patients reporting hydrocodone exposures were admitted to the critical care unit, with 20% being admitted to a psychiatric facility. Residence was the most common site of exposure (93.6%) and 67% of cases were enroute to the hospital via EMS when the PC was notified. Females were more frequently exposed to hydrocodone (63.8% of cases). Suspected suicide (36.7%) was the most common reason for exposure, with intentional abuse accounting for 12.1% of the cases. The proportion of suspected suicides (78.1%) was higher among cases reported by acute care hospitals and EDs, while abuse was less frequent (10.7%). Minor effects (34.1%) were the most prevalent among cases. There were 30 teenage deaths due to hydrocodone exposure, with 21 of them occurring in the hospital or ED setting. The most frequent co-occurring substances reported were benzodiazepines (12.3%), and Ibuprofen (10.4%). Tachycardia and vomiting were the most frequently demonstrated clinical effects. Naloxone was a reported therapy for 9.2% cases, with this therapy being performed prior to PC recommendation in most cases. Overall, teenage hydrocodone exposure calls decreased by 29% (95% CI: -32.8%, -24.9%; p<0.001), while the rate of such exposures decreased by 34.1% (95% CI: -38.6%, -29.3%; p<0.001).

Conclusions: PC data demonstrated a decreasing trend of hydrocodone exposures among teenagers, which may be attributed to the current decrease in opioid prescribing due to policy and practice changes. However, the increase in the proportion of calls from the acute-care hospitals and EDs indicates higher severity of such exposures, especially when multiple substances are involved.



N/A
Saumitra REGE (Charlottesville, VA, USA), Heather A. BOREK, Alsufyani ASAAD, Dr Christopher HOLSTEGE
16:10 - 17:40 #15243 - FP062 Efficacy Evaluation of Intravenous B-type Natriuretic Peptide, as an Adjunctive Treatment for Management of Severe Acute Asthma Attack, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Phase I,II.
FP062 Efficacy Evaluation of Intravenous B-type Natriuretic Peptide, as an Adjunctive Treatment for Management of Severe Acute Asthma Attack, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Phase I,II.

Background: Asthma is one of the most chronic disorders of Respiratory System. Asthma Acute Attack Crisis control is a health problem in Emergency departments, worldwide. This trial focus on the fact that if B-type Natriuretic peptide, as a bronchodilator, can improve clinical and para clinical indexes of severe acute asthma attack or not.

Methods: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 40 patients of severe acute asthma attack in the acute crisis were included in the study. The patients have been randomized to two case and control groups. The control group received severe asthma attack treatment consist of 3 doses of 2.5mg nebulized racemic albuterol and 0.5mg nebulized iprathropium bromide 0,20,40 minute after arrival. Also, a single dose of 50mg oral prednisolone prescribed at arrival. The case group received medication of control group as standard treatment plus intravenous B-type Natriuretic peptide 2microgram/kg bolus within 1 minute, followed by BNP infusion of 0.01 µg/kg/min for minutes 0-30, 0.02 µg/kg/min for minutes 31-60 and 0.03 µg/kg/min for minutes 61-90. Borg Dyspnea scal, FEV1 and PEFR were evaluated and recorded as investigated variables in the minutes 0, 30 ,60 ,90 after arrival. The trial sample size was calculated according to Phase I,II clinical trial sample size calculation standards; our study small sample size was a limitation for our trial. The case and control groups have been randomized via block randomization.

Results: Demographic features in terms of age (P=0.085), sex (P=0.752) and asthma duration (P=0.677) in both groups were similar. Clinical Borg dyspnea scale, FEV1, PEFR variables in both case and control groups in the minutes 0, 30, 60 and 90 after arrival did not make any significant differences(P>0.05). Finally, the severity of dyspnea was not different between the two groups at discharge (0.72 vs. 0.75, P=0.893).Hemodynamic parameters were not statistically different between case and control groups. There were no adverse effect, we could consider as known BNP side effects during the trial. 

Discussion and Conclusion: Our data showed no advantages of adjunctive administration of intravenous BNP infusion when it is added to acute severe asthma standard treatment. More study should be established to clarify the drug precise clinical influences. The small sample size of our study was an important limitation.

 



This Project has been directed with financial support of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. The Ethic Committee Approval code is: IR.AJUMS.REC.1394.234 The Project No. U-94070
Hassan MOTAMED (Ahvaz, Islamic Republic of Iran), Arash FOROZAN, Habib HAYBAR, Khorasani MOHAMMADJAVAD
16:10 - 17:40 #15103 - FP063 Rural drivers are more distracted than urban drivers: a roadside study of 25,000 subjects.
FP063 Rural drivers are more distracted than urban drivers: a roadside study of 25,000 subjects.

Background: With the expanded use of smartphones, distracted driving has became a trauma public health issue. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the incidence and geographical disparities in distracted driving in Canada.

Methods: An iOS-based app was developed to allow volunteer users to observe driver behaviours at the roadside without limitation in space and time. Data were reverse-geocoded through Google Maps API, population densities were computed based on the Canada Post Forward Sorting Area (FSA; first 3 digits of postal code), and population by FSA from Statistics Canada and the area of the FSA was computed from a corresponding shapefile.

Results: A total of 24,572 drivers were observed. The overall incidence of distracted driving was 9.68%. Men and women were equally distracted while driving, whereas professional drivers were more distracted than drivers in personal vehicles (12.2 v. 9.4, OR 1.33). The incidence of distracted driving ranged from 4.75% in British Columbia, 7.7% in Ontario, 10.0% in Nova Scotia, 11.3% in Quebec and 11.8% in Manitoba to 15.2% in Alberta. There was a strong relationship between population density and distracted driving, with sparsely populated areas having much more distracted driving than urban areas. The incidence of distracted driving decreased from 22% in sparsely populated areas (25 ha/km2) to 6.6% in densely populated areas (100,000 ha/km2).

Conclusion: Distracted driving is a very frequent behaviour. In Canada, on average 1 out of 10 drivers is actually distracted while driving. There are significant geographical variations in distracted driving across Canada.


David BRACCO, Mete ERDOGAN, Tarek RAZEK, Robert GREEN (Nova Scotia, Canada)

17:40
17:40-18:45
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B25
EUSEM 2018 Diploma and Certificate Ceremony

EUSEM 2018 Diploma and Certificate Ceremony

Moderator: Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Paris, France)
17:40 - 18:45 Introduction. Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Speaker, Paris, France)
17:40 - 18:45 YEMD Fellowship.
17:40 - 18:45 EMERGE EBEEM announcement. Ruth BROWN (Speaker) (Speaker, London)
17:40 - 18:45 European Board Examination of Emergency Medicine diplomates ceremony.
17:40 - 18:45 Best performance EBEEM Part A certificate.
17:40 - 18:45 Best performance EBEEM Part B certificate.
17:40 - 18:45 EMDM (European Master Disaster Medicine) Diploma ceremony. Pr Francesco DELLA CORTE (Head of Emergency Department) (Speaker, Novara, Italy)

Tuesday 11 September
Time Clyde Auditorium Lomond Auditorium Room Alsh #1 Room Alsh #2 Room Boisdale Room Carron Room Etive Room Forth Room Fyne Room Gala Room M4
08:30
08:30-09:00
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A30
KEYNOTE LECTURE 2 / Herman Delooz lecture
WHO Resources for Emergency Care Development

KEYNOTE LECTURE 2 / Herman Delooz lecture
WHO Resources for Emergency Care Development

Speaker: Teri REYNOLDS (Emergency and Trauma Care Lead) (Speaker, Geneva, Switzerland)

09:10
09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A31
DISASTER MEDICINE 1
Disasters in Europe

DISASTER MEDICINE 1
Disasters in Europe

Moderators: Pr Francesco DELLA CORTE (Head of Emergency Department) (Novara, Italy), Dr Abdo KHOURY (PROFESSEUR ASSOCIE) (Besançon, France)
Coordinator: Dr Abdo KHOURY (Coordinator, Besançon, France)
09:10 - 10:40 European Civil Protection Mechanism. Danilo BILOTTA (Speaker, Italy)
09:10 - 10:40 European migrant crisis: the state of the art. Manuel CARBALLO (Speaker, Switzerland)
09:10 - 10:40 Search and Rescue Activities in the Mediterranean Sea: the perspective of a young emergency physician. Alessandro JACHETTI (Emergency Doctor) (Speaker, Novara, Italy)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B31
RCEM award - the Rod Little prize

RCEM award - the Rod Little prize

Moderators: Alasdair GRAY (Edinburgh, United Kingdom), Jason SMITH (PHYSICIAN) (Plymouth, United Kingdom)
09:10 - 10:40 #14565 - RL01 Point-of-care-testing for procalcitonin in diagnosis of bacterial infections in young infants.
RL01 Point-of-care-testing for procalcitonin in diagnosis of bacterial infections in young infants.

Background

Young febrile infants under 3 months of age are typically treated as a high-risk group for invasive bacterial infection with many receiving parenteral antibiotics.  In the UK the current standard of practice for the management of febrile children comes from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the clinical practice guideline “Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management”.  In that guidance young febrile infants less than 3 months of age are identified as high risk of serious bacterial infection; with the advice that all febrile infants under one month of age and any “unwell” appearing febrile young infant be administered parenteral antibiotics.  The challenge is however, what to do with the young infants that do not meet the NICE guidance for immediate parenteral antibiotics?  Not all young infants with an invasive bacterial infection present to the emergency department with a fever. The signs of early invasive bacterial infection in this group are notoriously subtle resulting in many infants being treated “just in case”. Procalcitonin has been shown to be a useful biomarker for diagnosing invasive bacterial infections in this group.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of point of care testing for procalcitonin in identifying invasive bacterial infections in young infants.  The secondary objectives were to (i) assess the diagnostic accuracy of point of care testing for procalcitonin in identifying non-invasive bacterial infections (ii) assess the diagnostic accuracy of CRP and lactate in identifying invasive and non-invasive bacterial infections.

Methods

This was a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study adhering to STARD criteria for diagnostic accuracy studies. Young infants less than 90 days of age presenting to the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children with signs of possible bacterial infection were eligible for inclusion. Point of care testing was performed in the emergency department by clinical staff using 0.5ml of whole blood.  Testing was performed using a BRAHMS assay on the Samsung IB10 platform. Results were available within 20 minutes.  The outcome measures were the accuracy of procalcitonin in diagnosing invasive and non-invasive bacterial infections. The reference standard tests (bacterial culture and quantitative PCR) were performed by staff blinded to the index test result.

Results:

124 children were included in the study over a 5-month period.  The rates of invasive and non-invasive bacterial infections were 3.2% and 10.3% respectively.  Procalcitonin performed well in both groups AUC of 0.97(CI 0.94-1.0) for invasive bacterial infections and AUC of 0.81(CI 0.62-1.0) for non-invasive infections.  A cut-off value of 0.5ng/ml demonstrated sensitivity and specificity for invasive bacterial infections of 1.0 and 0.91 respectively.  The same cut-off demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity for non-invasive bacterial infections of 0.71 and 0.97 respectively.  The introduction of point of care testing for procalcitonin was associated with a 30% reduction in parenteral antibiotic use when compared to a pre-intervention control group of 104 infants p<0.05.

Conclusions:

Procalcitonin demonstrates an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the identification of invasive bacterial infections in young infants. 



Ethical approval was granted by Belfast Trust Research and Development office who designated the project as quality improvement. The study was funded by the RBHSC charitable funds. Dr Waterfield is funded by the HSC NI Public Health Research & Development fellowship.
Thomas WATERFIELD (Belfast, United Kingdom), Julie-Ann MANEY, Martin HANNA, Derek FAIRLEY, Michael SHIELDS
09:10 - 10:40 #14902 - RL02 A qualitative study of practitioner perspectives on medical record keeping in sudden onset disasters.
RL02 A qualitative study of practitioner perspectives on medical record keeping in sudden onset disasters.

Background:

It is well established that medical record-keeping during (and subsequent data available from) disasters is, at best, non-standard and, at worst, poor quality or non-existent.  Steps are being taken to change this, however without a broad articulation of the reasons behind the underlying problem.  This study aims to explore practitioner experience of medical documentation in disasters to illustrate the practical and cultural challenges to be overcome.

Methods:

Participants were identified as those with experience working in disaster settings from different countries, organisations, healthcare professions and levels of disaster experience.  After 13 semi-structured interviews conducted between March and July 2017, using an inductive approach taken from a base-line of grounded theory, it was felt that saturation of themes was reached.  The participants of 9 different nationalities included the disciplines of general surgery, anaesthesia, emergency medicine, paediatrics, physiotherapy and orthopaedic surgery and between them had experienced at least 15 different organisations working in the field of disaster medicine. 

The interviews were recorded and conducted using a topic guide which was revised 4 times to reflect the evolving nature of the interview questioning in response to participant response.  The audio-recordings were transcribed and then subject to coding using thematic analysis.  The positionality of the researcher as an emergency medic with an interest in, and some experience of the topic area, was reflected in the analysis.  The main limitations to the study are: absence of participants from some areas with multiple teams and/or frequent disaster response such as the Americas, China and Japan; and the likelihood of respondent bias from those who have some pre-existing interest in medical records.  

Results:

The themes of the interviews were grouped into higher themes.  These higher themes include: the circumstances of a disaster present a unique environment therefore adapted civilian solutions are not as effective as those tailored directly to the environment; across the board practitioners are acutely aware of the deficiencies of medical documentation and acknowledge that the challenges, whilst explaining them, do not justify these deficiencie; paper and electronic solutions have their benefits and limitations and an approach which encompasses both and mitigates their deficiencies is preferred; incentivising medical documentation at an organisational, national and/or international level is required to change the culture in disasters. 

Discussion & Conclusions: 

The results of this study highlight the depth of focus which is needed to really make progress in the area of medical documentation in disasters.  The low priority of medical records in many emergency medical teams (EMTs) is deeply embedded within the culture of working practice.  Without time and resource investment, improvements will be marginal and the opposing challenges will remain overwhelming.  It requires a ‘champion’ within each EMT to constantly bring this issue to the fore-front, establish standard practice and ensure all EMT members partake in the process, until it becomes a natural part of clinical care in the same way it has done in much of civilian practice.



The study did not receive specific funding however forms part of a PhD study co-funded by the Hong Kong Disaster Preparedness & Response Institute and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine
Dr Anisa Jabeen Nasir JAFAR (Manchester, )
09:10 - 10:40 #15073 - RL03 The lack of correlation between the Injury Severity Score and the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients in the United Kingdom.
RL03 The lack of correlation between the Injury Severity Score and the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients in the United Kingdom.

Background

The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was originally derived as a means of summarizing the severity of multiply injured patients and for standardising injury reporting.  An ISS > 15 is the most commonly used definition of the major trauma patient, and following the regionalisation of trauma services in the United Kingdom, patients sustaining major trauma (ISS > 15) should be treated at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC).  

With it not being possible to calculate the ISS in the prehospital environment, we question its appropriateness to determine which patients should be treated at a MTC. A more appropriate metric might be the resource-needs of the trauma patient, reflecting their current acuity.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the ISS correlates with the resource-based requirement of injured adult patients in the United Kingdom. 

Method

A retrospective database review was conducted using the Trauma Audit Research Network database for all adult patients (aged >18years) between 2006-14.  Patients were categorised as needing a life-saving intervention if they received one or more interventions from a previously defined list of 32 interventions.  Derived using international Delphi consensus, interventions included intubation and ventilation, transfusion (>4units blood products) and emergent surgery (laparotomy and thoracotomy).

ISS was analysed for all patients needing life-saving interventions.  A comparison was provided for the thresholds ISS > 15 and ISS > 8, the latter being included as it correlates with the UK trauma best practice tariff.  An additional comparison was conducted for mortality (ISS and life-saving intervention). 

Results

127,233 patients were included in the analysis: 55.6% male, median age 61.4 years (IQR 43.1-80.0) and median ISS 9 (IQR 9-16).  The predominating mechanism of injury was falls < 2m (53.7%) followed by road traffic collisions (21.9%). 24,791 patients (19.5%) received one or more life-saving interventions, intubation and ventilation was the most frequently performed intervention (6.9%), followed by thoracocentesis (6.2%).

Approximately half the study population requiring a life-saving intervention had an ISS <15 (n=12,221, 49.3%), by contrast when the lower ISS threshold was used (ISS <8), only 8.6% population received a life-saving intervention (n=2,132).  Pearson’s correlation coefficient demonstrated only a weak correlation between ISS and need for life-saving intervention (r = 0.348). Of patients who died, 60.9% had an ISS > 15, by contrast, only 39.5% received a life-saving intervention.

Discussion & Conclusion

This study demonstrates that there is an incomplete correlation between the ISS and the resource needs of trauma patients within the UK.  This therefore questions the validity of using the ISS as a means to validate pre-hospital MTC triage algorithms.  Whilst the ISS demonstrates reasonable association with mortality following trauma, almost 50% of the population requiring life-saving interventions did not meet the traditional definition of major trauma.   We believe that this original definition needs to be reconsidered, and either lowered or an alternative metric be sought. 


James VASSALLO (Bristol, ), Jason SMITH
09:10 - 10:40 #15686 - RL04 What are the CT scan findings and outcomes for patients taking warfarin with mild head injury? A quantitative analysis of AHEAD data.
RL04 What are the CT scan findings and outcomes for patients taking warfarin with mild head injury? A quantitative analysis of AHEAD data.

Background

Head injury is a major reason for emergency department attendance and the number of patients taking anticoagulants is increasing. There is a lack of robust evidence for the investigation and management of these patients and international clinical decision rules recommend computed tomography scanning of all patients regardless of their individual presentation.

The AHEAD study aimed to determine the rate of adverse outcome in head injured patients taking warfarin and to identify whether symptoms and/or Glasgow Coma Score were associated with different patterns of CT abnormality.

Methods

The AHEAD study was a multicentre observational study which took place in 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland. Routine data was collected for adult patients (aged >16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury and were currently taking warfarin.

Computed tomography scan reports were classified according to pre-agreed criteria and were analysed compared to the patients’ age, symptoms and GCS using statistical software packages.

Results

Data was obtained for 3534 patients ranging in ages 18-101 years, median age 79.

1897 patients (53.67%) had a CT scan and reports were obtained for all patients. Out of all 3534 patients eligible for a CT scan (all patients taking warfarin are recommended to receive a CT scan of the head according to NICE guidelines), 153 (4%, 95% CI 3.63-4.97%) patients had a CT scan showing an intracranial abnormality likely to be attributable to their injury. Their ages ranged from 36-99, median 81, IQR 75-86. Of these, 9 patients (5.92%, ages 70-85) went on to have neurosurgery and 1 patient (0.64%, age 81) died.

Subdural haematoma was the most common type of intracranial abnormality (37.25%, n=57) followed by mixed types of haemorrhage (20.9%), subarachnoid haemorrhage (15.69%) and intracerebral haemorrhage (14.38%). 416 patients had a CT showing another (extra-cranial) abnormality likely to be due to injury (e.g. scalp haematoma or skull fracture), 888 patients had a CT abnormality unlikely to be due to the injury (e.g. old infarcts, small vessel ischaemia or mucosal thickening) and 440 patients had a normal CT scan.

In total, 10 patients (0.17%, 95% CI 0.11-0.45%) had neurosurgery (data not available for 34 patients) and 20 patients (0.25%, 95% CI 0.32-0.82%) died.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a low proportion of injury-related abnormal CT findings (4%) in patients taking warfarin who have GCS=14-15. A very small proportion of these go on to have neurosurgery or die, perhaps because of the abnormality type or the patients' suitability for surgery.

The majority of patients with head injuries when taking warfarin who have GCS 14 or 15 do not have any serious sequelae from their head injury and therefore it may be possible to reduce the amount of CT head scans we perform and reduce the cost, time use and radiation exposure for these patients in the emergency department. In particular, it would be suitable to include consideration of the individual patient’s suitability and preference for surgery when making the decision for CT scanning.



Trial registration no: NCT02461498 This study was independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme grant reference number PB-PG-0808-17148.
Rachel EVANS (University of Sheffield, United Kingdom), Maxine KUCZAWSKI, Suzanne MASON
09:10 - 10:40 #15446 - RL05 Assessing the impact of introducing S100B biomarker into the UK head injury guidelines.
RL05 Assessing the impact of introducing S100B biomarker into the UK head injury guidelines.

Introduction

Head injury (HI) occurs in 1 million people per year in the UK, and represents 10% of emergency department admissions. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, defined as GCS 14 or 15) accounts for 90% of HI nationally. An elevated serum level of biomarker S100B has been found to correlate with brain injury following trauma. It has been demonstrated to have a greater than 99% negative predictive value when used to rule out CT abnormalities in mTBI. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee (SCN) guidelines published in 2013 introduced biomarker S100B into their algorithm for mTBI in adults. This guideline was externally validated in a North American population in 2015, revealing 97% sensitivity and a reduction in CT imaging by 32%. The addition of S100B to current guidelines has resulted in average cost benefits of 78 Euros per patient in a Swedish population.

This study aims to predict the resource impact of introducing S100B into UK practice.

 

Methods

All adult patients (age 18-65) presenting with head injuries to the emergency department of a large teaching hospital were included over a 28 day study period. Notes were retrospectively reviewed in order to find patients who would have had S100B levels taken according to current SCN guidelines. Criteria for S100B measurement is mTBI (GCS 14 or 15) with no high risk features other than vomiting or syncope, presenting within 6 hours of injury. National tariff and incidence data was then used to extrapolate findings to a wider population.

 

Results

Two hundred and thirty eight patients presented with HI during the study period with 89.1% (212/238) identified as mTBI. Forty-eight per cent (114/238) of patients underwent CT scans, with 40% (96/238) meeting criteria for S100B measurement according to SCN guidelines. No patients (0/212) in the mTBI group had positive findings on CT head scans. Eleven per cent (27/238) of HI patients were admitted to hospital, 85% (23/27) of whom would meet criteria for S100B measurement at presentation. Given that S100B levels will be low in 30% of this group, thus avoiding further investigation, we calculate that using S100B would reduce CT imaging by 25% (28/114) and reduce hospital admissions by 26% (7/27) in our cohort of head injured patients.

Extrapolating our findings to national incidence data we can see the annual impact would be a reduction of over 71000 CT scans and over 17000 admissions across the UK.

 

Discussion

According to national tariffs, the cost of an emergency admission is £379 and the cost of CT head is £78. Our findings point to a potential multi-million pound annual saving nationally with the introduction of S100B in selected mTBI patients. We recognise that the impact of introducing a biomarker may be limited by strict compliance to new guidelines required for efficient use of S100B. As such we propose a prospective validation and feasibility study of S100B in a UK population. Given that 43% of HI patients presented via ambulance in our study, the potential to introduce a biomarker in the prehospital setting should also be explored.


Nicholas MOORE (London, United Kingdom), Sarah DICKSON, Jasmin BASSI, Lisa RAMAGE, Michael PATTERSON
09:10 - 10:40 #15985 - RL06 Can emergency physician gestalt “rule in” or “rule out” acute coronary syndrome: validation in a large prospective diagnostic cohort study.
RL06 Can emergency physician gestalt “rule in” or “rule out” acute coronary syndrome: validation in a large prospective diagnostic cohort study.

Background

Suspected cardiac chest pain is a common problem in the Emergency Department (ED) representing 3% of all attendances in England. It is the most common reason for emergency admission accounting for 25% of all acute medical admissions. Most of these do not have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with prevalence at 8-10%. Many accelerated diagnostic protocols are available to help differentiate those needing admission and those who can be safely discharged. Some early evidence has suggested that clinician judgement or gestalt alone may be sufficient to “rule in” or “rule out” ACS.

Our aim was to externally validate whether gestalt alone was sufficient to “rule in” or “rule out” ACS in a large heterogeneous population.

Methods

The Bedside Evaluation of Sensitive Troponin (BEST) study is a large multicentre prospective diagnostic cohort study on patients presenting to ED with possible ACS warranting further investigation and admission. Comprehensive clinical, ECG and biochemical data was collected at presentation. Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction transferred for immediate primary percutaneous coronary intervention were excluded. Patients underwent further biochemical testing after 3 hours using high sensitivity troponin assays, were followed up throughout their inpatient course and after 30 days. The primary outcome was a composite of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.

On initial review within the ED, clinicians recorded their ‘gestalt’ using a five-point Likert scale. They were not blinded from the point of care Troponin. This was compared to the studies primary outcome data in order to investigate the aims of this sub study.

Results:

Data was collected across 18 centres with 1613 cases meeting inclusion criteria. 165 were excluded due to missing data (10.2%) on AMI. 1235 (85.3%) did not have AMI with 213 (14.7%) having AMI. The mean age of those with no AMI was 57.2 years (SD 15.1) and 66.0 years (SD 14.8) in those with AMI. Data on both AMI and clinician gestalt was present in 1391 (86.23%). Gestalt group results were: “definitely not” 60: 57 no AMI and 3 with AMI, “probably not” 493: 469 no AMI and 24 with AMI, “could be” 466: 407 no AMI and 59 with AMI, “probably” 313: 229 no AMI and 84 with AMI and “definitely” 59: 22 no AMI and 37 with AMI.

Using gestalt “definitely not” as a cut off for ruling out AMI showed a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 4.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 14.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0%. Accuracy decreased with gestalt “probably not”: sensitivity 87.0%, specificity 44.4%, PPV 21.5% and NPV 95.1%. Using gestalt “definitely” to “rule in” AMI showed a sensitivity of 17.9%, specificity of 98.1%, PPV 62.7% and NPV 87.2%. Accuracy decreased with gestalt “probably” as the cut off for diagnosis with sensitivity 58.5%, specificity 78.8%, PPV 32.5% and NPV 91.6%.

Conclusions

Clinician judgement of “definitely not” is accurate to a sensitivity of 98.6% at ruling out AMI whilst a gestalt of “definitely” has a specificity of 98.1% at “ruling in” AMI.



REC Reference Number: 14/NW/1344 CSP Reference: 148295 UK CRN 18000 Study Funders: 1. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 2. Manchester Metropolitan University (which is receiving some funding from the Saudi Arabian Government) 3. Abbott Point of Care 4. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (Research Grant) 5. Reagents donated by Abbott Point of Care; FABP-ulous; Siemens; Alere; Radiometer 6. Horizon-2020 EU grant (subcontracted by FABPulous)
Govind OLIVER (Manchester, United Kingdom), Niall MORRIS, Rick BODY

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D31
Eye Opener Quiz
Interactive and fun quiz - YEMD Session

Eye Opener Quiz
Interactive and fun quiz - YEMD Session
Interactive Session

Moderators: Blair GRAHAM (Research Fellow) (Plymouth, United Kingdom), Basak YILMAZ (Faculty) (BURDUR, Turkey)
Speakers: Blair GRAHAM (Research Fellow) (Speaker, Plymouth, United Kingdom), Incifer KANBUR (Assistant doctor) (Speaker, Istanbul, Turkey), Basak YILMAZ (Faculty) (Speaker, BURDUR, Turkey)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E31
NURSES/ EUSEN
Trauma and Disaster

NURSES/ EUSEN
Trauma and Disaster

Moderators: Frans DE VOEGHT (The Netherlands), Damir VAZANIC (Deputy Director, master's degree nurse) (ZAGREB, Croatia)
09:10 - 10:40 Performance of a trauma team activation tool. Ole-Petter VINJEVOLL (Speaker, Trondheim, Norway)
09:10 - 10:40 Two mass casualty incidences involving tourists in Iceland: preparedness of the emergency department at Landspitali National University Hospital. Gudrun Lísbet NÍELSDÓTTIR (Project manager, emergency planning) (Speaker, Reykjavík, Iceland)
09:10 - 10:40 Solutions to the biggest inhospital disaster - emergency department crowding. Christien VAN DER LINDEN (Clinical Epidemiologist) (Speaker, The Hague, The Netherlands)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C31
CARDIOVASCULAR
The most controversial issues around cardiovascular emergencies, debated by experts

CARDIOVASCULAR
The most controversial issues around cardiovascular emergencies, debated by experts

Moderators: Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Manchester), Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Berlin, Germany)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
09:10 - 10:40 The hottest topics in acute coronary syndromes. Pr Edd CARLTON (Emergency Medicine Consultant) (Speaker, Bristol, United Kingdom), Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany), Nick MILLS, Barbra BACKUS (Emergency Physician) (Speaker, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Frank PEACOCK (Vice Chair of Research) (Speaker, Houston, USA)
09:10 - 10:40 Venous thromboembolism and syncope: important updates for emergency physicians. Yonathan FREUND (PUPH) (Speaker, Paris, France), Daniel HORNER (Speaker, Manchester, United Kingdom), Matthew REED (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Edinburgh)
09:10 - 10:40 The hottest topics in acute heart failure. Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany), Said LARIBI (PU-PH, chef de pôle) (Speaker, Tours, France), Frank PEACOCK (Vice Chair of Research) (Speaker, Houston, USA)

09:10-10:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F31
ETHICS & PHILOSOPHY
Ethical challenges when recognising abuse in the ED

ETHICS & PHILOSOPHY
Ethical challenges when recognising abuse in the ED

Moderators: Tobias BECKER (Speaker) (Jena, Germany), Yves MAULE (MANAGER DE SOINS / PhD Candidate) (Bruxelles, Belgium)
09:10 - 10:40 Domestic abuse: a substantial health problem. Helen ASKITOPOULOU (Chair Ethics Committee) (Speaker, Heraklion, Greece)
09:10 - 10:40 Screening and detection of child abuse. Dr Thomas BEATTIE (Senior lecturer) (Speaker, Edinburgh, United Kingdom), Dr Rodrick BABAKHANLOU (M.D. M.Sc.) (Speaker, Edinburgh)
09:10 - 10:40 Recognition and management of elder abuse in the ED. Robert LEACH (Head of Dept.) (Speaker, BRUXELLES, Belgium)
09:10 - 10:40 Risk management of domestic abuse. Bernard FOEX (Consultant in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care) (Speaker, Manchester, United Kingdom)

10:40 - 11:10 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
11:10
11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A32
GLOBAL EM
EUSEM Global Health Plenary

GLOBAL EM
EUSEM Global Health Plenary

Moderators: Shweta GIDWANI (London), Riccardo LETO (Emergency physician) (Genk, Belgium), Najeeb RAHMAN (Consultant in EM) (Leeds)
Coordinator: Stevan BRUIJNS (Coordinator, Yetminster)
11:10 - 12:40 What use can global health experience have for European EDs? Amy HUGHES (Speaker, Cambridge, United Kingdom), Andreas CREDE (Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Sheffield, United Kingdom), Teri REYNOLDS (Emergency and Trauma Care Lead) (Speaker, Geneva, Switzerland)
11:10 - 12:40 The voluntourist survival guide. Hooi-Ling HARRISON (Speaker, London, United Kingdom), Jennifer HULSE (Speaker, United Kingdom), Najeeb RAHMAN (Consultant in EM) (Speaker, Leeds)
11:10 - 12:40 Bias and emergency medicine in Eastern Europe. Tatjana RAJKOVIC (Speaker, NIS, Serbia), Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy), Lavinia NGARUKIYE (Speaker, France)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B32
RCEM GRANTS & RCEM PRIZES

RCEM GRANTS & RCEM PRIZES

11:10 - 12:40 The Young Investigator Award – “Which crowding measure or measures are most strongly associated with inpatient mortality. Hridesh CHATHA (Speaker, Sheffield, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 The Principle Investigator award - Reflections of an amateur academic. Jason KENDALL (Consultant) (Speaker, Bristol, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 2018 Royal College of Emergency Medicine Undergraduate Essay Prize. Isabel FITZGERALD (Student) (Speaker, Exeter, United Kingdom)
A repeated measures trial comparing the valsalva assist device to manometer while performing the modified and supine valsalva manoeuvres.
11:10 - 12:40 RCEM Grant Update - Early exclusion of acute coronary syndromes in the Emergency Department: a comparative validation of the MACS and HEART scores. Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Manchester)
11:10 - 12:40 David Williams' Lecture. Will TOWNEND (Speaker, United Kingdom)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D32
Terrorism and war
Experience emergency medicine during terror attacks and war - YEMD Session

Terrorism and war
Experience emergency medicine during terror attacks and war - YEMD Session

Moderators: Bulut DEMIREL (Clinical Development Fellow) (Glasgow), Katarzyna HAMPTON (Attending Physician) (USA, Poland)
11:10 - 12:40 Major Incident, Standby. Rachel STEWART (Female) (Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
11:10 - 12:40 Military medic without ultrasound is like a sniper without a scope! Katarzyna HAMPTON (Attending Physician) (Speaker, USA, Poland)
11:10 - 12:40 Terror and War up close. Begum OKTEM (MD) (Speaker, Ankara, Turkey)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E32
NURSES/ EUSEN
Geriatric Emergency nursing Care

NURSES/ EUSEN
Geriatric Emergency nursing Care

Moderators: Gudrun Lísbet NÍELSDÓTTIR (Project manager, emergency planning) (Reykjavík, Iceland), Ole-Petter VINJEVOLL (Trondheim, Norway)
11:10 - 12:40 Geriatric Emergency Nurse: connecting emergency care with the community. Ingibjörg SIGURSÓRSDÓTTIR (Clinical nurse specialist) (Speaker, Reykjavík, Iceland)
11:10 - 12:40 Negotiation of teamwork: How nurses and physicians as a team consider their ESI-based triage level in older ED patients: an Interpretive description. Thomas DREHER-HUMMEL (Nurse) (Speaker, Basel, Switzerland)
11:10 - 12:40 Elderly care in Croatian rural hospital Emergency Department. Valentina KOVACEK (Speaker, Molve, Croatia)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C32
EDUCATION
From the Curriculum, through the Classroom, to the Clinic-Teach the right stuff, Teach it right, and Take it to the bedside.

EDUCATION
From the Curriculum, through the Classroom, to the Clinic-Teach the right stuff, Teach it right, and Take it to the bedside.

Moderators: Ruth BROWN (Speaker) (London), Andy NEILL (Doctor) (Dublin, Ireland)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
11:10 - 12:40 Curriculum-Curriculum 2.0 and Curriculum +, the new European standard. Eric DRYVER (Consultant) (Speaker, Lund, Sweden), Gregor PROSEN (EM Consultant) (Speaker, MARIBOR, Slovenia), Cornelia HÄRTEL (Medical Director of the ED, Consultant in EM, Director of Medical Education in EM) (Speaker, STOCKHOLM, Sweden), Ruth BROWN (Speaker) (Speaker, London)
11:10 - 12:40 Clinic-Methods for moving the goal line in moving current science into the day to day practice of emergency medicine. Greg HENRY (Speaker, USA)
11:10 - 12:40 Classroom- How to implement education in the busy E.D. environment? Roland BINGISSER (Speaker, Basel, Switzerland)

11:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F32
FREE PAPER 8
Critical Care / Interventions

FREE PAPER 8
Critical Care / Interventions

Moderators: Wilhelm BEHRINGER (Chair) (Vienna, Austria), Christien VAN DER LINDEN (Clinical Epidemiologist) (The Hague, The Netherlands)
11:10 - 12:40 #14980 - FP064 Critical Care in the Paediatric Emergency Department.
FP064 Critical Care in the Paediatric Emergency Department.

 

Background

Critical care delivery has been defined by the American Medical Association and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) as a physician's direct delivery of medical care for a critically ill or critically injured patient. Critical care is decision making of high complexity to assess and support vital organ systems to prevent further life-threatening deterioration of the patient's condition. To our knowledge, there has been no study to describe the prospective incidence of critical care, illness and injury in an Irish/European paediatric emergency department (PED) setting. 

Primary Objective

To establish the incidence of critical care delivery for illness or injury in an ED in Ireland’s largest tertiary academic paediatric hospital over 1 year.

Methodology

A prospective observational study from 1/4/17 to 31/03/2018 with consecutive enrolment of patients who required critical care (e.g. ≥2 20ml/kg bolus) , a critical care intervention (e.g. rapid sequence induction) or procedure (e.g. chest drain) in the ED delivered by emergency, anaesthetic, intensive care or surgical specialties. Data was triangulated from charts, electronic (ED information system –Triage category 1 & 2/ PICU admissions) and registry (Pharmacy and Resuscitation logbooks) sources. Cases were screened for inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were determined by definitions from national and international guidelines (e.g. British Thoracic Society for asthma). Critical care interventions and procedures were agreed by consensus. The study was approved by the research and ethics committee.  

Results

The annual census was 37471 patients, with 285 (0.8%) receiving critical care. A total of 6280 (17% of annual census) were category 1 & 2 (Irish Children’s Triage System) cases.  The mean age of presentation was 4 years with a range from 1 week to 18 years. Of the 285 cases, 92 (32%) were triaged as category 1 (most critical) upon presentation. A total of 153 (54%) patients presented during regular working hours (8:00 to 18:00) with 196 (69%) arriving by personal transportation. Significant pre-existing co-morbidities were present in 105 (37%) cases. The top 5 clinical presentations were sepsis 32 (11%), laryngotracheobronchitis 28 (10%), gastroenteritis 27 (9%), seizures 21 (7%), and bronchiolitis 21 (7%).  

Intraosseous vascular access was secured in 4 (3%), central venous access in 2 (1.5%), and peripheral intravenous in 249 cases (87%). Interventions were performed by emergency, intensive care and surgical doctors. 

A total of 171 (60%) patients required 2 or more critical care interventions including 10 (3%) endotracheal intubations, 27 (9%) high flow O2/CPAP, and 2 (0.7%) chest drain insertions. There were 76 (27%) patient transfers to PICU and 4 (3%) out of hospital cardiac arrests pronounced dead in the ED and 2 (0.7%) children died within 7 days of admission to PICU.

 

 Conclusion

This is the first study to describe prospectively the incidence of critical care delivered in an Irish tertiary paediatric emergency department. Encountering critical care in the PED translated to an intensive care admission in only 27% of cases. This study informs the provision of local education (e.g. simulation), departmental manpower and hospital-wide critical care provision.

 

 

 

 

    


 


Laura MELODY (Dublin, Ireland), Michael BENNETT, Blackburn CAROL, Walsh SEAN, Madeleine NIERMEYER, Barrett MICHAEL
11:10 - 12:40 #15540 - FP065 USCOM-derived Systemic Vascular Resistance in the Emergency Department: A prospective study.
FP065 USCOM-derived Systemic Vascular Resistance in the Emergency Department: A prospective study.

Objective                                               

We have previously validated a practical method for identifying shock in critically ill patients in emergency department (ED) patients. The aims of this study were to investigate the correlation between USCOM-derived cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and the shock assessment tool, and to investigate whether USCOM-derived CO and SVR predicts 30-day mortality.

Method

In a prospective, longitudinal study conducted in an ED in Hong Kong, patients aged ≥18 years presenting to the resuscitation room or high dependency unit were recruited. Patients were classified into one of five shock groups and assessed using USCOM. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

Results

Patients with warm peripheries shock and normal peripheries shock had a significantly elevated mean CO and lower mean SVR compared with patients with possible shock. Mean SVR/SVRI was also significantly lower in patients with cold peripheries shock. There were significant differences in all outcomes across the groups, with the highest 30-day mortality (46.9%) occurring in the cold peripheries shock group, and the highest composite outcome (80%) occurring in the warm peripheries shock group. In patients with a temperature ≥37.2℃, the mean CO and CI were significantly higher, and mean SVR and SVRI significantly lower than in patients with a temperature < 37.2℃ (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis shows that for each 100 d.s.cm-5.m2increase in SVR or SVRI, 30-day mortality decreases by 8.6% (95%CI 0.8%~15.8%, P<0.05) and 5.8% (95%CI 1.2 %~10.3%, P<0.05) respectively.

Conclusions

USCOM-derived CO and SVR correlated with shock in the ED, and SVR and SVRI in particular predicts 30-day mortality.  USCOM may have a role in detecting shock and risk stratification in the ED.



N/A
Jun-Rong MO, Nga-Man CHENG, Yan-Ling LI, Pei-Yi LIN, Stewart CHAN, Xiao-Hui CHEN, Graham COLIN, Timothy RAINER (Cardiff, )
11:10 - 12:40 #15657 - FP066 Can passive leg raise predict fluid responsiveness in Emergency Department? Pilot data of an experimental study.
FP066 Can passive leg raise predict fluid responsiveness in Emergency Department? Pilot data of an experimental study.

Objectives: Passive leg raise (PLR) is a reversible self-fluid challenge used to predict fluid responsiveness (FR). Combining PLR with non-invasive cardiac output monitoring may be a useful tool for stratifying patients into those who may benefit and those who could be harmed by fluid therapy in emergency department (ED). We aim to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of PLR test to predict the haemodynamic response to fluid bolus in ED.

Methods: A prospective experimental study was conducted on ED patients. We included a convenience sample of patients ≥18 year-old planned to receive a fluid bolus and able to consent and excluded patients whose clinical condition prevents performance of PLR. Patients were monitored using thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) monitor (Niccomo, Medis, Germany) using 2 pairs of electrodes to the sides of the neck and lower chest. A 3-minute leg raise test (PLR 1) was performed (semi-recumbent to 45° leg raise) followed by a fluid bolus. A second test (PLR 2) was carried out 10 minutes after fluid infusion. The average stroke volume (SV) during PLR and by the end of fluid bolus was calculated and FR was defined as ≥ 10% increase in SV from baseline. Assuming that the prevalence of fluid responsiveness is 60% and the expected sensitivity and specificity of PLR test is 85% and 90% respectively, a sample of 105 will be required assuming that 20% of patients will have missing data (alpha= 0.05, beta= 0.80).

Results: We enrolled 17 patients with median age of 56 years (Interquartile range, IQR 53-76) and 10 (59%) were males. The median TEB signal quality was 51% (IQR 28-62%) throughout the monitoring sessions. At baseline, median mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 88 (IQR 78-101), heart rate 111 (IQR 84-128) and lactate 1.8 (IQR 1.2-4.4). Seven patients (41%) were fluid responsive with PLR1 compared to 11 patients (65%) with fluid bolus and only 3 patients (18%) in PLR2. The median SV change with PLR1 was -2% (IQR -12-14%) compared to 24% (IQR -3-30%) with fluid bolus. PLR1 had a sensitivity of 55% (95% confidence interval, CI 28-79%) and specificity of 83% (95% CI 44-99%) in predicting FR. PLR1 had a Positive likelihood ratio of 3.27 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.55.

Conclusion: These pilot data show that PLR was feasible with adequate monitoring quality in ED. The test showed lower accuracy in predicting FR than reported in critical care literature, which raises questions about the applicability in non-paralysed spontaneously breathing patients in ED. About one third of patients did not show a SV response to fluid loading, suggesting a place for haemodynamic monitoring in ED to prevent over-treatment.



Ethical approval was obtained from East of England - Essex Research Ethics Committee under reference 16/EE/0145. Mohammed Elwan received funding through Newton Mosharafa PhD Fund - British Council and Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education.
Dr Mohammed ELWAN (Leicester, United Kingdom), Ashraf ROSHDY, Eman ELSHARKAWY, Salah ELTAHAN, Timothy COATS
11:10 - 12:40 #15690 - FP067 Epinephrine in cardiogenic shock: analysis of 2,583 patients.
FP067 Epinephrine in cardiogenic shock: analysis of 2,583 patients.

 

Background:

Cardiogenic shock (CS) often requires catecholamine use in intensive care unit or in the emergency department. The epinephrine place remains debated because of its potentially side effects.

Methods: 

Meta-analysis based on the individual study data was performed on a systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Web of Sciences database using search terms about CS and catecholamine or vasopressors. Thus, 16 studies included 2583 patients with CS all causes and received epinephrine alone or in association with other catecholamine, were assessed using a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO registration number CRD42017082370). Importantly, studies were selected for analysis in at least 15% of patients treated with epinephrine. Patients with post cardiac arrest were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was short-term mortality rate. 

Results:

Short-term mortality rate for the all population was 45% (21% to 55%). 52% of patients were male. In this meta-analysis, CS causes were acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 66%, post cardiac arrest patients in 45%. 947 patients received epinephrine (36.6%) alone or in association with others vasopressors or inotropes and an association between epinephrine and mortality was found at D30 (OR 3.33 [2.81-3.94]). This result is confirmed with the adjusted-analysis for confounding factors (OR [4.68 3.43-6.39]. We performed also a propensity score (338 patients in each group) which highlighted the consistent harmful epinephrine effects (OR 4.22 [2.99-5.96]).

Discussion: 

Our study highlights the adverse effects of epinephrine in cardiogenic shock. The mechanisms of its toxicity remain unclear. It is probable that the increase in oxygen consumption due to tachycardia is partly responsible. On the other hand, the major alteration of the microcirculation (e.g. for the renal function) can precipitate a multi-organ failure. Lastly, all the studies in our meta-analysis, find an association with mortality suggesting that it would be desirable to use other inotropes and/or vasopressors to replace adrenaline.

Conclusion:

In this study including 2583 patients with CS all causes, the epinephrine use were associated with an increase in short-term mortality rate.



PROSPERO registration number CRD42017082370).
Valentine LEOPOLD, Etienne GAYAT, Romain PIRRACCHIO, Jindrich SPINAR, Tuukka TARVASMÄKI, Johan LASSUS, Veli-­pekka HARJOLA, Sébastien CHAMPION, Faiez ZANNAD, Serafina VALENTE, Philip URBAN, Horng‐Ruey CHUA, Rinaldo BELLOMO, Batric POPOVIC, Dagmar OUWENEEL, José Ps HENRIQUES, Gregor SIMONIS, Bruno LÉVY, Antoine KIMMOUN, Philippe GAUDARD, Mir Babar BASIR, Andrej MARKOTA, Christoph ADLER, Hannes REUTER, Alexandre MEBAZAA, Tahar CHOUIHED (Nancy)
11:10 - 12:40 #15826 - FP068 Prognostic role of biomarkers in septic patients.
FP068 Prognostic role of biomarkers in septic patients.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers in identifying LV and RV systolic dysfunction during sepsis.

Methods: We included patients diagnosed with severe sepsis/septic shock and admitted in our ED-High Dependency Unit between August 2012 and February 2018, in whom an echocardiogram was performed within 24 hours from admission. We evaluated LV systolic function using Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS, > -14% diagnostic for LV systolic dysfunction) and RV systolic function with Tricuspidal Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE, <16 mm diagnostic for RV systolic dysfunction). We divided our population in three subgroups: patients with normal LV and RV systolic function (G1), those who had either LV or RV dysfunction (G2) and those who had biventricular dysfunction (G3). Biomarkers levels were measured both at the time of admission (T0) and after 24 hours (T1), considering them both as continue and dichotomized values (TnI: ≤0.1 or > 0.1 µg/L; NTproBNP: > or ≤ 7000 pg/mL). Day-28 mortality was our primary end-point.

Results: we included 238 patients (mean age 73±15 years, male sex 58%, T1 SOFA score 6.0±2.9), 41% with septic shock, 28-day mortality rate 27%. Troponine (T0: 0.59±2.19 vs 1.7±8.2 ug/L; T1: 0.68±2.04 vs 1.52±5.08 ug/L) and NTproBNP levels (T0: 12421±19511 vs 24346±44189 pg/L; T1: 16760±60038 vs 26666±33423 pg/L, all p<0.05) were similar in survivors and non-survivors. Conversely, Troponine level was significantly higher in patients with impaired GLS, both considering continuous values (T0: 1.21±5.67 vs 0.23±0.67, p=0.04; T1: 1.21±3.81 ug/L, p=0.002) and dichotomized values (T0: Troponine ≥0.1 in 31% of survivors and 56% of non-survivors; at T1, 42 vs 61%, all p ≤0.01). T0 NTproBNP was significantly higher in patients with reduced TAPSE (26341±44025 vs 17127±64910 pg/L), while T1 levels were comparable between the subgroups. An NTproBNP>7000 pg/L was more frequent among patients with RV dysfunction (T0: 64 vs 38%; T1 67 vs 41%, all p <0.01) than in patients with LV dysfunction (T1: 55 vs 37%, p=0.018). By an analysis with ROC curves, Troponine (T0: Area under the curve, AUC, 0.64, 95%CI 0.56-0.71; T1: AUC 0.65, 95%CI 0.58-0.73, p≤0.001) and NTproBNP (T0: AUC, 0.68, 95%CI 0.60-0.77; T1: AUC 0.68, 95%CI 0.60-0.76, all p<0.001) showed a fair discriminative value, respectively for impaired GLS and TAPSE. We compared biomarkers level among subgroups with increasing cardiac dysfunction: T0 troponine levels were comparable while T1 levels were higher in G3 compared with other subgroups (G1: 0.30±1.28; G2: 0.68±2.28; G3: 2.32±9.81, p>0.05 between G1 vs G3 and G2 vs G3). A Troponine >0.1 prevalence increased in different subgroups (respectively 29%, 55% and 52% at T0, p=0.005; 41%, 58% and 61% at T1, p=0.06). T0 NTproBNP was higher in G1 than in G3 (9164±15134 vs 27448±29116, p<0.05), while T1 levels were comparable between subgroups; an NTproBNP>7000 prevalence significantly increased in different subgroups (33%, 45% and 72% at T0; 33%, 48% and 75% at T1, p≤0.001).

Conclusions: Biomarkers levels were significantly higher in patients with impaired LV and/or RV systolic function, with a fair to good diagnostic accuracy.


Valerio Teodoro STEFANONE (Florence, Italy), Federico D'ARGENZIO, Marco CIGANA, Vittorio PALMIERI, Francesca INNOCENTI, Riccardo PINI
11:10 - 12:40 #15846 - FP069 Diagnostic performance of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index and Echo-monitored Change in Cardiac Output induced by Passive Leg Raising test in fluid responsiveness assessment.
FP069 Diagnostic performance of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index and Echo-monitored Change in Cardiac Output induced by Passive Leg Raising test in fluid responsiveness assessment.

Background: the aim of this work was to evaluate diagnostic performance of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and echo-monitored change in cardiac output induced by passive leg raising, in fluid responsiveness assessment of critically ill patients in the Emergency Department.

 

Methods: this prospective study enrolled a non-selected population of critically ill patients admitted to the Emergency Department High-Dependency Unit (ED-HDU) of Careggi University-Hospital from January 2015 to January 2018. An ultrasonographic examination was performed assessing the inferior vena cava collapsibility index and variations in aortic velocity time integral (VTI) after a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver.

Patients were classified as fluid responder if having an inferior vena cava collapsibility index ≥ 40% and/or an aortic VTI increase ≥ 10% during PLR. Based on this, a therapeutic strategy was chosen (e.g. fluid replacement, diuretics, inotropes and vasopressors) and it was subsequently reassessed during the next 12 hours. 

 

Results: we evaluated 60 patients, with mean age 63±14 years, 58% male, mean SOFA score 5.6±3.0. The most common diagnoses were sepsis/septic shock (78%) and acute exacerbation of COPD (8%). Mean left ventricular dimensions were within the normal range (EDV 73±30 ml), as well as left and right ventricular systolic function (EF 50±14%; TAPSE 17±6 mm).

In 16 patients the only inferior vena cava collapsibility index could be assessed, with 14 patients resulting non-fluid responder; a change in therapeutic strategy during the following 12 hours was performed in 6 of them.

In 17 patients only the aortic VTI after PLR could be assessed; 10 patients were non-fluid responder and a change in therapeutic strategy after 12 hours performed for 1 case in both responder and non-responder groups.

In 27 patients an integrated evaluation with the two methods could be performed: 12 patients resulted non-fluid responder and 15 patients fluid responder. The two methods were discordant in 9 patients: in 8 of them the IVC collapsibility index was < 40% with a positive PLR (and a change in therapeutic strategy in one case), conversely in one case the IVC collapsibility index was > 40% with a negative PLR and therapeutic strategy changed after 12 hours.

Based on these results, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of the two methods.

For the inferior vena cava collapsibility index, sensitivity was 46%, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%, and the negative predictive value was 59%. It should be noted the absence of false positives and the significant number of false negatives. For the variations in aortic VTI after PLR sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were all 91%.

 

Conclusions:

Diagnostic performance of passive leg raising in fluid responsiveness assessment in critically ill patients is excellent.

On the other hand, the evaluation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index is a reliable method in predicting fluid responsiveness only when >40%, with relevant false negative results for smaller values.

 


Caterina SAVINELLI, Federico MEO (Torino, Italy), Alessandro COPPA, Francesca INNOCENTI, Riccardo PINI
11:10 - 12:40 #15355 - FP070 A qualitative study to identify the opportunity for health promotion intervention in the emergency department.
FP070 A qualitative study to identify the opportunity for health promotion intervention in the emergency department.

Background

Emergency department (ED) staff frequently see patients with potentially modifiable risk factors for acute, chronic or subsequent illness. Health promotion interventions delivered in the ED have been advocated for these patients but delivery remains suboptimal. Studies report brief interventions in the ED increase smoking cessation rates and reduce injury recurrence following alcohol misuse. The support of clinical staff is essential to provide effective screening programmes and brief interventions for ED patients. This study aimed to compare the perspectives of doctors and nurses in the emergency department (ED) in order to recommend improved strategies and opportunities for health promotion interventions.

Methods

A multicentre, qualitative study was conducted in three EDs in Scotland in 2017. All ED staff at one large teaching hospital and two general hospitals were approached during hand over meetings. All staff who provided direct patient care were eligible for the study (n=273) and offered a multicomponent survey. The primary outcome was self-reported rates of current practice and perceived barriers to practice. Secondary outcomes included methods to improve health promotion delivery and beliefs on patient prioritization for brief interventions in the ED. Two pilot phases of the survey to refine questions were conducted before department role out. The second pilot survey was tested on eligible staff and data included in overall results. Tests for significant differences between doctors and nurses were conducted using chi-square statistics and 95% confidence intervals.

Results

197 of 273 staff responded, representing a 72% response rate. Of the 197 respondents, 79 (40%) were doctors and 118 (60%) were nurses. More doctors (86.1%, CI [76.8-92.1]) than nurses (51.7%, CI [42.8-60.5]) report offering health promotion interventions and specifically for alcohol misuse, smoking, drug misuse and sexual health interventions. A higher rate of doctors (94.4%, CI [87.7-98.0]) reported their role involved brief interventions compared to nursing staff (72.0%, CI [63.3-79.3]). Time constraints (n=172, 87.3%) and a lack of health promotion infrastructure (n=100, 50.7%) in the ED were found to challenge widespread delivery (groups not mutually exclusive). Over 91% (n=180) of staff perceived the delivery of health promotion interventions be a shared responsibility amongst all ED staff.  Staff felt patients whose presentation was directly related to smoking and alcohol/drug misuse or patients with new-found hyperglycemia should be prioritised for brief interventions in the ED.

 

Discussion & Conclusions

This is the first staff perspective study in the UK and shows encouraging rates of heath promotion intervention being reported by ED staff, exceeding those previously reported in US and Australian studies. Staff acknowledge the benefit of health promotion, in agreement with other studies, but time constraints and insufficient ED resources are unanimously recognised as barriers to practice. Despite a much improved response rate to previous studies (30-67%), results may overestimate the true proportion of staff supporting ED interventions due to the rate of non-completion. Staff require additional training in brief intervention techniques and treatment options to enhance their management of patients presenting to the ED with potentially modifiable risk factors



Staff were verbally consented to participate in the study which approved by the University of Edinburgh Research Ethics assessment process.
Simon ROBSON (Edinburgh, United Kingdom), Alasdair GRAY
11:10 - 12:40 #15522 - FP071 Emergency in endoscopy - a prospective study on foreign bodies in the upper digestive tract.
FP071 Emergency in endoscopy - a prospective study on foreign bodies in the upper digestive tract.

Background: Most foreign bodies (FB) pass the digestive tract without causing lesions. Their impaction at the esophagus, stomach or duodenum's level requires endoscopic evaluation and treatment. The study's main aim is to evaluate the patients with FB in the upper digestive tract and to assess the possibilities and limits of endoscopic treatment.

Methods: There were prospectively studied 110 patients with voluntary or involuntary ingestion of FB and suspicion of impaction at the upper digestive tract level, that have performed upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) at the Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Iasi between 1st of January 2017 and 1st of January 2018. The following parameters were considered: age, sex, presence and type of FB, symptoms, radiological examination, the impaction place, associated lesions, success of endoscopic treatment.

Results: From the 110 patients, the UDE confirmed the presence of FB in 84 of them (76.36%). 69% of the patients were men and the medium age was 56 years old. 72.61% were alimentary foreign bodies (meat, bones, pips) the rest of them being "real": 15 were voluntarily swallowed (wires, spoons, nails) by prisoners and patients with psychiatric problems and 6 accidentally: needles, dental prostheses. There have also been 2 cases of iatrogenic FB: naso-gastric sonde impacted in a suture of a patient with operated stomach and an esophageal band in a cirrhotic patient with upper digestive bleeding. Simple radiography identified FB in only 19 of the patients (22.6%). The main symptoms were dysphagia, chest pain, odinophagia, sialorrhea. Concerning the place of impaction, 49 (58.3%) were esophageal FB, 28 gastric and 9 duodenal. In case of voluntarily swallowed FB, only 2 patients (13.3%) had associated lesions: resected stomach, reflux esophagitis; in case of impaction of alimentary FB, 41 patients (67.2%) had associated lesions: peptic stenosis, postcaustic stenosis, esophageal rings, hiatal hernia, achalasia cardia, esophageal cancer. Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90.47% of the cases. 8 patients were sent to surgery: 2 refused repeated examinations, 2 had FB longer than 12 cm and 4 patients had sharp FB, impacted in the mucosa. The complications were minor: ulcerations of the mucosa, autolimited upper digestive bleeding, fever. There were no cases of perforation or death.

Conclusion: UDE only reveals FB at 3/4 of the patients with positive anamnesis. Impacting FB is more common in men and the elderly. Most FB are alimentary, they affect the esophagus and are associated with pre-existing lesions. Most of the "real" FB are voluntarily swallowed by prisoners or people with psychiatric problems. Even though American guides assert the necessity of endoscopic treatment in only 10-20% of the cases, in our study over 70 % of the patients had endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic treatment is effective in the majority of patients.


Ruxandra MIHAI, Diana IOSEP, Ruxandra MIHAI (Iasi, Romania)
11:10 - 12:40 #15682 - FP072 The treatment of accidental digital epinephrine injection by auto-injector. A systematic review.
FP072 The treatment of accidental digital epinephrine injection by auto-injector. A systematic review.

Introduction: The use of epinephrine auto-injectors as treatment for anaphylaxis is not always intuitive and accidental self-injection is not a rare event. Studies on accidental digital epinephrine auto injection reported that all patients had complete resolution of symptoms; however, when signs of ischemia are present, pain and sensory problems are described to last up to 10 weeks in untreated cases.

Objectives: To review the time to relief of symptoms after treatments used in cases of accidental digital epinephrine auto injections reported in the literature to date.

Data sources: A systematic review was performed. Embase, Medline Cochrane central and Web of science databases were searched by title and abstract to identify reports of unintentional digital injections from epinephrine auto-injectors.

Study selection: Publications were selected for inclusion based on title, abstract and full text. Articles were excluded when not written in the English or Dutch language or when full text of the publication was unavailable and reviews were excluded.

Results: In 33 reports we found 49 cases of digital auto injection with epinephrine of which 46 had signs of ischemia (pain, pallor, coldness, decreased capillary refill or loss of sensibility). The age of cases ranged from 5 to 68 years with a median of 30 years. 56.1% of cases was female. In 7 cases gender was not reported. All described auto-injections were localized in the volar aspect of thumb or index finger.

The median time from auto-injection till the start of treatment was 60 minutes ranging from 1 minute to 6 hours. In 49 cases 96 treatment options were reported. Patients underwent zero to five consecutive treatments, mostly due to absence of satisfactory results in the treatments chosen first. The order in which these treatments were given varied from case to case. The more frequently reported treatment options included: Application of nitroglycerin paste or patches in 30.2% of cases, warm water immersion in 17.7% of cases, local phentolamine infiltration with or without local anesthetics in 11.5% of cases, infiltration of phentolamine with or without local anesthetics proximal to the site of injury in 9.3% of cases, local infiltration of terbutaline in 6.3% of cases and a combination of local infiltration of phentolamine and Infiltration of phentolamine with or without local anesthetics proximal to the site of injury in 5.2% of cases. No treatment was started in 3.1% of cases.

The median time from initiation of the final treatment to relief of al symptoms was 240 minutes, and ranged from 480 minutes after warm water immersion to 5 minutes after local infiltration of phentolamine with local anesthetics.

Conclusions: In patients with signs of ischemia after accidental digital auto-injection with epinephrine a plethora of (serial) treatment options are used. Local infiltration of phentolamine relieved most patients of all symptoms in a matter of minutes. Addition of local anesthetics may facilitate an even quicker relief of symptoms but may interfere with testing the return of sensibility.


Pelle KLEIN (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Juanita HAAGSMA, Erick OSKAM, Pleunie ROOD

12:55
12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

AGM
EUSEM Annual General Assembly
for Members only

EUSEM Annual General Assembly
for Members only

12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D3I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Boussignac CPAP: What else?

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Boussignac CPAP: What else?

12:55 - 13:15 CPAP, background & physiology. Patrick PLAISANCE (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Paris, France)
13:15 - 13:35 CPAP, clinical feedbacks. Michel BLANCHE (Keynote Speaker, Ecouen, France)
13:35 - 13:55 The take home message. Nicolas PESCHANSKI (Praticien Hospitalier Urgentiste) (Keynote Speaker, Rennes, France)

12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E3I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Transforming Pain Management in Emergency Settings – Penthrox (methoxyflurane), the Missing Link?

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Transforming Pain Management in Emergency Settings – Penthrox (methoxyflurane), the Missing Link?

Moderator: Karim TAZAROURTE (Chef de service) (Lyon, France)
13:03 - 13:20 Time for Fast, Effective Analgesia. Frédéric LAPOSTOLLE (PU-PH) (Keynote Speaker, Bobigny, France)
13:20 - 13:37 Inhaled Methoxyflurane: A New Standard of Care? Sergio Garcia (Spain). Alberto BOROBIA (Keynote Speaker, MADRID, Spain), Sergio GARCIA (Keynote Speaker, MADRID, Spain)
13:37 - 13:44 Value of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Clinical Practice. Hugo DOWD (Emergency Medicine Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Antrim)

12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C3I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Optiflow (TM) Nasal High Flow Across the care continuum

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
Optiflow (TM) Nasal High Flow Across the care continuum

12:55 - 13:25 Evaluate the emerging and clinically significant applications for NHF therapy in the Emergency Department setting. Jonathan MILLAR (Keynote Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
13:25 - 13:55 Review the current evidence for Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy, including its mechanisms of action. John FRASER (Keynote Speaker, Brisbane/Glasgow, Australia)

12:55-13:55
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F3I
SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
The clinical utility of high sensitive troponin in the acute setting

SPONSORED SYMPOSIUM
The clinical utility of high sensitive troponin in the acute setting

Moderator: Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Manchester)
13:03 - 13:20 The benefits of accelerated algorithms of high sensitive troponin. Raphael TWERENBOLD (Physician) (Keynote Speaker, Hamburg, Switzerland)
13:20 - 13:37 The clinical value of high sensitive troponin in the emergency department in the UK. Pr Edd CARLTON (Emergency Medicine Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Bristol, United Kingdom)
13:37 - 13:43 Getting the international perspective – the first high sensitive troponin test in the US. Frank PEACOCK (Vice Chair of Research) (Keynote Speaker, Houston, USA)

14:10
14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A33
CARDIOVASCULAR
From the mouths of experts: what's new in Cardiovascular Emergencies that you really need to know about?

CARDIOVASCULAR
From the mouths of experts: what's new in Cardiovascular Emergencies that you really need to know about?
Hot Topic inside!

Moderators: Barbra BACKUS (Emergency Physician) (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Pr Edd CARLTON (Emergency Medicine Consultant) (Bristol, United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
14:10 - 15:40 The universal definition of MI in 2018. Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)
14:10 - 15:40 ! HOT TOPIC - Time matters in AHF. Frank PEACOCK (Vice Chair of Research) (Speaker, Houston, USA)
14:10 - 15:40 Think Aorta: triangulated perspectives on a challenging diagnosis. Catherine FOWLER (Aortic Dissection Awareness UK & Ireland Vice Chair) (Speaker, United Kingdom), Debbie HARRINGTON (Consultant) (Speaker, Liverpool, United Kingdom)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B33
DISASTER MEDICINE 2
Humanitarian Response

DISASTER MEDICINE 2
Humanitarian Response

Moderators: Dr Jeffrey FRANC (Associate Professor) (Edmonton, Italy), Luca RAGAZZONI (Scientific Coordinator) (Novara, Italy)
Coordinator: Dr Abdo KHOURY (Coordinator, Besançon, France)
14:10 - 15:40 Implementation and Activation of a Trauma Care System during the War in Mosul. Jesse MCLEAY (Presenter) (Speaker, Strathmore, Canada)
14:10 - 15:40 Damage Control Resuscitation in War Settings. Louis RIDDEZ (Associate Porofessor) (Speaker, Stockholm, Sweden)
14:10 - 15:40 Physiotherapy: an emerging key role in global humanitarian response. Alice HARVEY (Physiotherapist) (Speaker, Birmingham, UK, United Kingdom)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D33
Futuristic (emergency) medicine
What will the future in medicine look like? From technology to human factors - YEMD Session

Futuristic (emergency) medicine
What will the future in medicine look like? From technology to human factors - YEMD Session

Moderators: Tiarnan BYRNE (Ireland), Martin FANDLER (Consultant) (Bamberg, Germany, Germany)
14:10 - 15:40 "Back to the future". Marco BONSANO (Speaker) (Speaker, Norwich)
14:10 - 15:40 Technology Disruption. Delia NEBUNU (Resident) (Speaker, Bucharest, Romania)
14:10 - 15:40 The 3D Emergency Department. Tiarnan BYRNE (Speaker, Ireland)
14:10 - 15:40 A step back to humanities. Martynas GEDMINAS (Physician / Quality control) (Speaker, Šiauliai, Lithuania)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E33
NURSES/ EUSEN
Well-being of staff

NURSES/ EUSEN
Well-being of staff

Moderators: Valentina KOVACEK (Molve, Croatia), Ingibjörg SIGURSÓRSDÓTTIR (Clinical nurse specialist) (Reykjavík, Iceland)
14:10 - 15:40 Prevalence study of burn-out in Belgium emergency departments, key recommendations. Yves MAULE (MANAGER DE SOINS / PhD Candidate) (Speaker, Bruxelles, Belgium)
14:10 - 15:40 Implementation of electronic competence assessment program for emergency nurses – improved goal setting and job satisfaction. Dóra BJÖRNSDÓTTIR (Nurse, BSc, MSc) (Speaker, Iceland, Iceland)
14:10 - 15:40 Team Wellbeing in ED Design. Una CRONIN (Clinical Research) (Speaker, Limerick, Ireland)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C33
EDUCATION - Interactive Session
"True stories from emergency room" - Narrative learning in emergency medicine

EDUCATION - Interactive Session
"True stories from emergency room" - Narrative learning in emergency medicine
Interactive Session

Moderators: Simon CARLEY (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Manchester), Senad TABAKOVIC (Medical director emergency department) (Zürich, Switzerland)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
14:10 - 15:40 Emergency medicine mythology - of gods, demons and doctors. Greg HENRY (Speaker, USA)
14:10 - 15:40 Winter is coming, brains are heating up! Geoffroy ROUSSEAU (Praticien Hospitalier) (Speaker, Tours, France)
14:10 - 15:40 How to use narratives in emergency medicine education. Simon CARLEY (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Manchester)

14:10-15:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F33
FREE PAPER 9
Imaging / Ultrasound / Radiology / Toxicology

FREE PAPER 9
Imaging / Ultrasound / Radiology / Toxicology

Moderators: James GAGG (Consultant) (Taunton, United Kingdom), Simon ORLOB (Graz, Austria)
14:10 - 15:40 #14704 - FP073 Methodological characteristics of randomized controlled trials of ultrasonography in emergency medicine: a review.
FP073 Methodological characteristics of randomized controlled trials of ultrasonography in emergency medicine: a review.

BACKGROUND: Interest in ultrasonography (US) in emergency medicine has increased in recent years, as reflected by a marked increase in publications on the topic. Recent years have seen calls for an increase in emergency ultrasound research and manuscript publication to provide additional evidence of clinical efficacy. With the interest in US in emergency medicine, determining whether trials with published results are well-designed, transparent and fully reported, could be useful to clinicians. Poor reporting does necessarily mean poor methods, but adequate reporting allows readers to assess the strength and weakness of published studies and improve the replication of interventions in daily practice. The aim of this study was to 1) describe and evaluate methodological characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating an ultrasound intervention in an emergency department and 2) estimate whether the reports adequately described the intervention to allow replication.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed for all reports of RCTs published in 2015 assessing an ultrasound intervention, regardless of type, that were performed in an emergency department or evaluated in an emergency situation. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts of search results. Data from all included studies were independently extracted. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias of reports, and the intervention reporting was evaluated by using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.
Results: We identified 1406 reports of RCTs; 799 reports described research of an ultrasound intervention. Only 11 reports were in the emergency medicine field. Half of the studies evaluated an educational intervention (i.e., to identify vascular access) and half a clinical intervention. The median number of ultrasound operators was 36 [IQR 16-65]. Four studies did not provide the number of operators included in the study. The most frequently studied operators were medical or resident physicians (n=4 reports), emergency physicians (n=2) or both (n=1). The most frequent topic was vascular access/identification (n=4). Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were performed correctly in 55% and 27% of trials. Seventy three percent of of reports showed improper reporting or absence of participant blinding. Risk of bias due to assessor blinding was rated low for 3 RCTs (27%), risk of attrition bias low for all reports, and risk of selective outcome reporting unclear for most reports (n=10). Only 3 reports (27%) provided an optimal description of the intervention. Only three-quarters of reports (n=8; 73%) reported who provided the intervention. However, authors failed to report the background of participants and/or the number of participants providing the intervention.
Conclusion: Despite high clinical interest in US, few RCTs have evaluated an ultrasound intervention in emergency medicine. Moreover, the quality of these trials raises questions. In our sample, authors did not correctly report blinding of participants and outcome assessors or allocation concealment. Authors must ensure that they report all key items of RCTs to allow reproducibility of the intervention and generalizability of results.

Chauvin ANTHONY (Paris), Erwin HANSCONRAD, Patrick PLAISANCE, Dominique PATERON, Youri YORDANOV, Quentin DAFFOS
14:10 - 15:40 #14999 - FP074 Efficacy of renal stone detection on computed tomography scout view versus plain x-ray: An observational study.
FP074 Efficacy of renal stone detection on computed tomography scout view versus plain x-ray: An observational study.

Background

 

According to British Association of Urological Surgeons the standard for investigation of renal colic is non-contrast computed tomography kidney, ureter, bladder (CT KUB) which is highly sensitive (97%) and specific (95%). X-ray kidney, ureter, bladder is less sensitive and specific (44-77%) detecting approximately 60% of calculi. It is not recommended when CT KUB is available but may be helpful for comparison during follow-up.

 

Our local renal colic policy recommends that all patients with renal colic undergo CT KUB and XR KUB prior to discharge irrespective of whether the stone is visible on CT KUB scout image. This is in anticipation of repeat XR KUB for stone tracking at follow up. We aimed to determine whether CT KUB scout view was sufficient for stone detection thereby negating the need for XR KUB and further radiation.

 

 

Methods

 

Retrospective observational study of 50 consecutive patients between October and November 2017 who underwent CT KUB for investigation of suspected renal colic whilst in the Emergency Department (ED). Patients identified by searching the Patient Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and electronic clinical record.

 

Primary outcome was to determine whether any renal stones were detectable on CT KUB scout view by the reporting radiologist. In addition we identified patients who also underwent XR KUB and whether stone was identified.

 

Further data collected included patient demographics, final diagnosis based on radiology report and electronic patient record and whether any other significant abnormality was detected on CT KUB.

 

 

Results

 

50 patients included in the study, 72% were male. Age range was 17-80 years, mean of 39. All patients underwent CT KUB for investigation of suspected renal colic.

 

27 (54%) of the CT’s conducted were positive for renal calculi, of these 10 (37%) had a visible renal stone on scout view. The total number of patients with confirmed renal calculi on CT who went on to have XR KUB was 13 (48%). 5 of these patients had calculi visible on CT scout imaging, 4 (80%) were still visible on XR KUB and 1 (20%) was not. The remaining 8 patients did not have visible stones on CT scout views, of these 5 (62.5%) were visible on XR KUB and 3 (37.5%) were not.  

 

23 CT KUB’s were negative for renal calculi. 15 patients were diagnosed with minor conditions such as musculoskeletal pain or UTI. 8 patients had other significant findings on CT including gynaecological and urological malignancies.

 

Discussion & Conclusion

 

Our results indicate that use of CT KUB scout image alone is not reliable for stone detection in place of XR KUB, 62.5% of stones not visible on CT scout view that were visible on XR KUB.  There is arguably a role for XR KUB following CT KUB to assist with tracking of calculi at follow-up. The numbers of patients with renal calculi who had both CT KUB and XR KUB in this study were small (13). A larger study of patients who have had both modalities of imaging would be required to validate our results.


Claire MCGROARTY (Glasgow, United Kingdom)
14:10 - 15:40 #15025 - FP075 Ultasonography in the Diagnosis of Clavicle Fracture.
FP075 Ultasonography in the Diagnosis of Clavicle Fracture.

Purpose:

Most fractures of the clavicle have a good prognosis; patients have few or no residual symptoms once the fracture has healed. Plain radiography is the method for diagnosing the fracture of the clavicle. In this study we aimed to discuss the diagnostic success of ultrasonography versus x-ray.

Methods:

This study was a prospective evaluation of a diagnostic accuracy study which was performed between January and September 2016 at the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital. All patients admitted to the ED with a shoulder trauma were investigated for their eligibility to be included in the study. A standardized US performed by the same investigator to vizualise clavicle from sternal junction through acromial junction. After US, plain radiography was performed.

Results:

The mean age was 45.53 (min=18; max=86; SD=18.791) years and 72.7% were male. Among all 99 patients, 42 clavicula fractures were detected via graphy and 26 (62%) were seen in males and 60 patients with no clavicle fractures.  

The sensitivity of US to radiographically detected fracture was 88.1% (95% CI = 74.37% to 96.02%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI = 93.73% to 100%). The positive PPV was 91.94% (95% CI = 83.35% to 96.29%) and the NPV was 100% (95% CI = 87% to 99%).

Conclusion:

Ultrasonography is a good alternative for diagnosing clavicle fracture.  Future studies should examine the use of ultrasonography as a method for diagnosing of clavicle fracture by emergency physicians with only basic ultrasonographic training. 


Sinan KARACABEY (istanbul, Turkey), Erkman SANRI
14:10 - 15:40 #15423 - FP076 The validation study of deep venous thrombosis ultrasound screening in critically ill patients performed by general nurses.
FP076 The validation study of deep venous thrombosis ultrasound screening in critically ill patients performed by general nurses.

Background: Despite of preventive measures, the incidence of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is estimated to range from 5-31%. While clinical diagnostics is unreliable, ultrasound compression test (UCT) has proven to be a highly sensitive and specific investigation for its recognition. Delegating this competence to ICU nurses can increase UCT availability and enable preventive DVT screening. Thus, we decided to perform a clinical study to evaluate the validity of UCT performed by general nurse in ICU patients compared to an investigation by ICU physician certified in ultrasound. We hypothesize that general nurses are able to reach at least 75% sensitivity and specificity of DVT screening by UCT.

Methods: Prior to the study, each nurse participating in the study completed one-hour training in UCT and examined 5 patients under supervision. Then, ICU patients without known DVT underwent UCT in the femoral and popliteal region of both lower extremities performed by trained general nurse. On the same day, the examination was repeated by an ICU physician. The results of the examinations of each patient were blinded to each other for both investigators until both tests were performed. The validity parameters of the test performed by general nurse were calculated in comparison with the examination by a specialist.

Results: A total of 115 patients were examined. The prevalence of DVT of 7.8% has been found. The validity parameters of the overall UCT examination performed by general nurses were as follows: the sensitivity 88.9%, the specificity 99.1%, positive likehood ratio 94.2, negative likehood ratio 0.11, positive predictive value 88.9%, negative predictive value 99.1%, accuracy 98.3%.

Discussion & Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that general nurses are able to perform bedside screening of DVT by ultrasound compression test with a high degree of reliability after a brief training. We conclude that following appropriate education, this competence may be entrusted to them.



Ethical approval and informed consent not needed.
Skulec ROMAN (Kladno, Czech Republic), Kohlova ALENA, Miksova LENKA, Cerny VLADIMIR
14:10 - 15:40 #15435 - FP077 Transthoracic echocardiography performed at the patient’s bedside by the emergency physician versus the cardiologist: A concordance study about 44 cases.
FP077 Transthoracic echocardiography performed at the patient’s bedside by the emergency physician versus the cardiologist: A concordance study about 44 cases.

Introduction: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is practised in emergency departments by emergency physicians at the patient’s bedside as a routine special investigation procedure following a detailed physical examination. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the performance of TTE in emergency departments by emergency physicians by comparing the finding obtained to those given by an echoDoppler proficient cardiologist. 
Material and methods: This randomised prospective study was carried out in the emergency department during three months inclusive. It included all patients aged > 16 years in whom there was an urgent need to practice a TTE. The patients in the study had to undergo a double echocardiographic examination: an initial echocardiographic investigation carried out by an emergency physician who had previously received a three-month training in Doppler echocardiography, followed by a subsequent investigation performed by an echo-Doppler proficient cardiologist. 
The concordance of the findings obtained by both readers was evaluated by Kappa concordance test. The evaluation considered the global visual estimation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the presence or absence of pericardial effusion (independently of the site), and the diameter and compliance of the inferior vena cava (IVC). 
Results: Forty-four patients were involved in the study. Mean age was 52 + 13 years, sex ratio 5 males/7 females. 
The concordance of the findings obtained by the emergency physician and the cardiologist for the visual estimation of the LVEF was Kappa = 0.82 [95% IC 0.63-1] with an agreement = 0.90 [95% IC 0.74-0.99]. 
The concordance for measurement of the diameter of the IVC was Kappa = 0.95 [95% IC 0.63-1] with an agreement = 0.95 [95 % IC 0.64-0.99] and for assessment of its compliance it was Kappa=1 with an agreement = 1. 
The concordance of the findings obtained for the diagnosis of pericardial effusion was Kappa=0.86 [95% IC 0.71-1] with an agreement = 0.92 [95% IC 0.64-0.99] and the concordance for the detection of echocardiographic signs of compressive effusion was Kappa = 1 with an agreement =1. 

Conclusion: The concordance of the findings obtained by both operators was excellent. Emergency physicians should then be encouraged to practise TTE at the patient’s bedside. A prior training of 3 months in Doppler echocardiography is nevertheless necessary. 


Mehdi BEN LASSOUED (Tunis, Tunisia), Yousra GUETARI, Olfa DJEBBI, Mounir HAGUI, Rim HAMMAMI, Maher ARAFA, Ines GUERBOUJ, Ghofrane BEN JRAD, Khaled LAMINE
14:10 - 15:40 #16020 - FP078 Randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous access versus conventional technique in patients with difficult venous access presenting to the emergency department.
FP078 Randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous access versus conventional technique in patients with difficult venous access presenting to the emergency department.

Background: Peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation is a fundamental procedure in Emergency Department (ED).  It is usually a routine procedure; however, establishing a PIV catheter may turn out to be a difficult challenge. Difficult venous access (DVA) risk factors include: intravenous drug use, obesity and chronic illness.

 Several attempts with subsequent distress to patients is usually the case. Alternatives include external jugular vein (EJV) cannulation or central access. Using ultrasound (U/S) in peripheral cannulation is another rising fashion with limited evidence in literature.

There is a gap of knowledge needs to be filled. Will the use of U/S, compared to the traditional method, result in better success rate of cannulation and less procedure time in patients with DVA?

Methods: In this randomised controlled study, 300 patients with DVA presenting to Alexandria Main University Hospital ED, over a period of one year, were included. Inclusion criteria: At least two trials of cannulation using the conventional approach by a senior staff in the ED and/or history of DVA with no palpable or visible veins. Patients in a state of hemodynamic instability were on the exclusion list.

After local ethical committee approval, consenting patients and enrolment, DVA patients were individually randomized to two groups; the U/S guided PIV (study) group and the conventional (control) group. Regarding the study group, U/S guidance was performed in real time using 1-person technique in the intravenous placement. In the control group, veins were identified using palpation and visual inspection.

Primary measured outcome was the success of cannulation; infusing 5cc bolus fluids without infiltration, more than two attempts was interpreted as failure. Procedure time “from tourniquet placement to cannulation” was another outcome. Exceeding 15 minutes was a failure.

Statistical data was analysed using IBM SPSS software. Qualitative data was described using number and percent. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution. Quantitative data were described using range, mean, standard deviation and median. Significance of the obtained results was judged at 5% level. Statistical tests were used when appropriate.

Results: Both groups were homogenous with no statistical difference at baseline regarding patients’ gender, age, body mass index and the reason for DVA. In the control group 71 patients (47.3%) had successful cannulation compared with 118 (78.7%) in the U/S group which was statistically significant (p<0.001). The procedure time was significantly less (P value <0.001) in traditional group (4.19 ± 1.76 minutes), while U/S use led to prolongation of cannulation with mean time 9.01 ± 3.31 minutes. No serious adverse events recorded.

Discussion & conclusions: U/S guidance is established as standard of care for central venous access but research has failed to develop gold standard for PIV access. Cumulative studies in literature tried to use U/S in PIV access, results were inconclusive making further studies warranted. In this study, U/S guided PIV in patients with DVA showed higher success rate over blind technique. However, procedure time was prolonged. U/S guided vascular access is a skill that needs mastering by the Emergency Medicine staff.



Did not receive specific funding.
Marwan GAMALELDIN (Leicestershire, United Kingdom), Salah ELTAHAN, Nagwa ELKOBBIA, Tamer GAWEESH
14:10 - 15:40 #15136 - FP079 TRENDS AND DETERMINANTS OF STUDENT HAZARDOUS DRINKING – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS USING MULTIPLE DATASETS IN A U.S. PUBLIC UNIVERSITY.
FP079 TRENDS AND DETERMINANTS OF STUDENT HAZARDOUS DRINKING – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS USING MULTIPLE DATASETS IN A U.S. PUBLIC UNIVERSITY.

Objective

This study examined the trends in incidence and socio-demographic, organizational, academic, and clinical risk markers of student drinking associated with Emergency Department (ED) visits and incident reports from the University Incident Management Response System (IMRS).

 Methods

 A prospective cohort study of students enrolled in a U.S. public university from 2010/11 to 2015/16 was conducted. Student enrollment data were linked to primary healthcare data and subsequent ED visits with alcohol intoxication identified using ICD codes, and linked to alcohol-related incidents that occur on and off grounds recorded in the IMRS system within one year following the first (index) enrollment of each year. Incidence rate per 10,000 person-years for each of the 2 hazardous drinking outcomes was calculated, and annual trends in the incidence were analyzed using Poisson regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to provide adjusted hazard ratios (HR) (95 % CIs) for the association between student characteristics and each of the hazardous drinking outcomes studied.  

 Results

The cohort consists of 204,423 students, 56% males, after excluding 5,675 students (2.7%) with missing data on covariates. A total of 1041 students had at least one ED visit with alcohol intoxication and 5,359 students had at least one alcohol-related incident within one year after the index enrollment; the overall incidence rate was 59/10,000 person-years and 311/10,000 person-years, respectively. There were a total of 455 students in both groups (7.6% of total students encountered).

 In the first 6 years from 2009-10 to 2014-15, incidence of student alcohol intoxication associated with ED visits increased linearly from 45/10,000 person-years to 71/10,000 person-years (p<0.001). Similarly, incidence of alcohol-related incidents increased linearly from 249/10,000 person-years to 361/10,000 person-years (p<0.001), but to a lesser extent (by 45% vs. by 57%). In the last 2 years of the study period, incidence of both types of hazardous drinking showed a decline from 72 to 65/10,000 person-years (9%) and from 361 to 318/10,000 person-years (12%), respectively.

 These two  hazardous drinking outcome measures share common risk markers, including: males (versus females),  below 20 years of age (versus 25-30 years),  Hispanic (versus Asian) students, parental tax dependency, Greek life member, undergraduate (versus graduate students), first time enrolled students, and having an existing diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. In addition, African American, White, and multiracial students were at higher risk for alcohol-related incidents, while students who transferred from a prior institution were at lower risk. Past year alcohol use was significantly associated with higher risk for ED visits with alcohol intoxication. Being a member of a university athletic team appeared to be protective against alcohol intoxication associated with ED visits, but this protection was lost for alcohol-related incidents. 

 Conclusions

Data on student hazardous drinking captured in ED clinical data and the IMRS showed consistent trends in the period studied. Linking student admission data with ED clinical data and IMRS data can more fully capture and monitor student hazardous drinking behaviors and identify student groups at higher risk who subsequently can be targeted for intervention efforts. 


Duc Anh NGO, Saumitra REGE, Nassima AIT-DAOUD, Dr Christopher HOLSTEGE (Charlottesville, USA)
14:10 - 15:40 #15299 - FP080 Determinants of length of hospital stay and one and three year mortality rates in patients presenting with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) to an Emergency Department.
FP080 Determinants of length of hospital stay and one and three year mortality rates in patients presenting with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) to an Emergency Department.

Background: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is recognized to be a common complication of hospital admission in patients with alcohol use disorder. Despite the frequency with which it occurs there is a paucity of epidemiological data in the literature regarding the effects of inpatient AWS on mortality and patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between clinico-pathological characteristics, GMAWS, length of hospital stay (LOS) and one and three year mortality rates.

Methods: A retrospective case note review of all patients admitted via the Emergency Department at Glasgow Royal Infirmary between the 1st-31st of January 2015 was performed with each attendance where notes were available being recorded as a unique admission (n= 2,105). In NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde patients at risk of AWS are managed using the  Glasgow Modified Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (GMAWS) which quantifies the severity of a patient’s symptoms and guides frequency and dosing of benzodiazepine treatment. Notes were screened for presence of a GMAWS chart indicating the patient was felt to be at risk of AWS by a healthcare professional during that admission.

 

Results: GMAWS assessment was performed during 166 of the 2,105 admissions. In those patients who had GMAWS performed, one year and three year mortality was 15% and 32% respectively. Using LOS >7 days as an endpoint, age >65 years (p<0.0001), sex (p=0.518), deprivation as categorized by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) (p=0.996), highest GMAWS (p=0.093) and requirement for active treatment (p=0.394) were examined as determinants. On binary logistic regression analysis both age >65 (p=<0.001) and highest GMAWS (p=0.051) were independently associated with LOS >7 days. Using one year mortality as an endpoint age >65 (p=0.230), sex (p=0.720), SIMD (p=0.335), highest GMAWS (p=0.091) and LOS>7 days (p=0.03) were examined as determinants. Both highest GMAWS (p=0.026 and p=0.212) and LOS >7 day (p= 0.01 and p=<0.001) were independently associated with one year mortality. Only LOS>7 days was independently associated with three year mortality.

 

Discussion/Conclusions: Both age and highest GMAWS were independently associated with LOS >7 days. Highest GMAWS and LOS >7 days were independently associated with one year mortality. LOS >7 days was also associated with three year mortality, however highest GMAWS was not. GMAWS is a useful measure of the severity of alcohol withdrawal and predicts prolonged hospital stay and one year mortality.


David Patrick ROSS (Glasgow, United Kingdom), Donald MCMILLAN, Donogh MAGUIRE
14:10 - 15:40 #15711 - FP081 Trends and Characteristics of Oxycodone Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers, 2011 – 2017.
FP081 Trends and Characteristics of Oxycodone Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers, 2011 – 2017.

Background: Between 1991 and 2013, there was a three-fold increase in prescribing of opioids in the United States. According to the Substance Abuse and Health Services Administration, there were 182,748 visits to emergency departments (ED) related to oxycodone products in 2010. Between 2009 and 2014, there has been a 49% decrease in the initiation of oxycodone misuse according the National Survey of Drug Use and Health. This study aims to examine the national trends in oxycodone exposures reported to U.S. poison centers (PCs).

Methods: The National Poison Data System (NPDS) was queried for all closed, human exposures to opioids from 2011 to 2017 using the American Association of Poison Control Center (AAPCC) generic code identifiers for oxycodone. We identified and descriptively assessed the relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Oxycodone reports from acute care hospitals and EDs were analyzed as a sub-group. Trends in oxycodone frequencies and rates (per 100,000 human exposures) were analyzed using Poisson regression methods. Percent changes from the first year of the study (2011) were reported with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: There were 119,263 oxycodone exposures reported to the PCs from 2011 to 2017, with the calls decreasing from 19,165 to 14,859 during the study period. Among the overall oxycodone calls, the proportion of calls from acute care hospitals and EDs increased from 46.2% to 55.6% from 2011 to 2017. Multiple substance exposures accounted for 54.1% of the overall oxycodone calls and 70% of the calls from acute care hospitals and EDs. The most frequent co-occurring substances reported were benzodiazepines (21.2%), and hydrocodone (5.1%). Residence was the most common site of exposure (94.2%) and 59.2% cases were enroute to the hospital when the PC was notified. Tachycardia and respiratory depression were the most frequently demonstrated clinical effects. Naloxone was a reported therapy for 19.9% cases, with this therapy being performed prior to PC contact in most cases. Demographically, 54.9% cases were females, and the most frequent age groups were 20-39 years (32.6%) and 40-59 years (28.6%). Suspected suicides (36.7%) and intentional abuse (11.4%) were commonly observed reasons for exposure, with these proportions being higher in cases reported by acute care hospitals and EDs (57.5% and 13.4%, respectively). Approximately 20% of the patients reporting oxycodone exposures were admitted to the critical care unit (CCU), with 10% of patients being admitted to non-CCU. Major effects were seen in 6.1% cases and the case fatality rate for oxycodone was 1.3%, with 1,476 deaths reported. There were 546 deaths reported within acute care hospitals and EDs during the study period. The frequency of oxycodone exposures decreased by 22.5% (95% CI: -24.2%, -20.8%; p<0.001), and the rate of oxycodone exposures decreased by 14.1% (95% CI: -22.6%, -5.3%; p=0.009).

Conclusions: PC data demonstrated a decreasing trend of oxycodone exposures, which may in part be attributed to the reformulation of this medication with abuse‐deterrent properties in 2010. However, the increase in the calls from the acute-care hospitals and EDs indicates higher severity of such exposures along with coingestants.



N/A
Saumitra REGE (Charlottesville, VA, USA), Heather A. BOREK, Marissa KOPATIC, Dr Christopher HOLSTEGE

15:40 - 16:10 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
16:10
16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A34
WELLBEING
Looking after each other

WELLBEING
Looking after each other
Hot Topic inside!

Moderators: Alasdair CORFIELD (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Glasgow), Yves LAMBERT (Chef de Service) (Versailles, France)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
16:10 - 17:40 Compassionate Governance. Chris TURNER (Speaker, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 ! HOT TOPIC: Playing nicely in the sandbox. Neil SPENCELEY (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 The tightrope of ‘life balance’ in EM- creating success & satisfaction. Dr Tajek HASSAN (Board Chair for Europe, IFEM) (Speaker, Leeds)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B34
MENTAL HEALTH

MENTAL HEALTH

Moderator: Adrian BOYLE (United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Mental Health meets Life Support, a paradigm shift in training. Roger ALCOCK (Speaker, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 A cry for help. Niijar SATVEER (d) (Speaker, West Midlands, UK, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 what good MH services should look like? Catherine HAYHURST (Speaker) (Speaker, CAMBRIDGE, United Kingdom)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D34
Young Leadership / Women in EM
Overcoming obstacles and becoming a successful leader - YEMD Session

Young Leadership / Women in EM
Overcoming obstacles and becoming a successful leader - YEMD Session

Moderators: Marco BONSANO (Speaker) (Norwich), Basak YILMAZ (Faculty) (BURDUR, Turkey)
16:10 - 17:40 Learning to lead. Vimal KRISHNAN (SPEAKER & MODERATOR) (Speaker, THRISSUR, INDIA, India)
16:10 - 17:40 Young; female; leader? Rachel STEWART (Female) (Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Becoming the boss - what now? Riccardo LETO (Emergency physician) (Speaker, Genk, Belgium)
16:10 - 17:40 Women in male-dominated EM. Jona SHKURTI (Speaker, Albania)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E34
NURSES/ EUSEN
Emergency Nursing research

NURSES/ EUSEN
Emergency Nursing research

Moderators: Una CRONIN (Clinical Research) (Limerick, Ireland), Yves MAULE (MANAGER DE SOINS / PhD Candidate) (Bruxelles, Belgium)
16:10 - 17:40 Hot topics in emergency nursing research. Jochen BERGS (Speaker, Hasselt, Belgium)
16:10 - 17:40 Transforming psychiatric care delivery in the emergency department: one hospital’s journey. Frans DE VOEGHT (Speaker, The Netherlands)
16:10 - 17:40 Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in Croatian Emergency Medicine Service. Damir VAZANIC (Deputy Director, master's degree nurse) (Speaker, ZAGREB, Croatia)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C34
DISASTER MEDICINE 3
Hot Topics in Disaster

DISASTER MEDICINE 3
Hot Topics in Disaster

Moderators: Pr Ives HUBLOUE (Chair) (Brussels, Belgium), Dr Mick MOLLOY (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (WEXFORD, Ireland)
Coordinator: Dr Abdo KHOURY (Coordinator, Besançon, France)
16:10 - 17:40 Sendai for European science and health actions. Virginia MURRAY (Speaker, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 Ethics and Disasters: from where we are to where we need to go. Donal O’MATHUNA (Associate Professor) (Speaker, Dublin, Ireland)
16:10 - 17:40 Medium and long-term health effects of earthquakes. Alba RIPOLL GALLARDO (Physician) (Speaker, Milan, Italy)

16:10-17:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F34
FREE PAPER 10
Toxicology / Trauma

FREE PAPER 10
Toxicology / Trauma

Moderators: Blair GRAHAM (Research Fellow) (Plymouth, United Kingdom), Pr Suzanne MASON (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Sheffield, United Kingdom)
16:10 - 17:40 #15490 - FP082 Attitudes towards research among acute toxicology admissions.
FP082 Attitudes towards research among acute toxicology admissions.

Background

The burden of acute poisoning in Scotland is sizeable.  Studies around acute poisoning, however, are relatively rare.  The time immediately following an admission with self-poisoning can be distressing, and there are concerns regarding patients consenting to research at this acute stage.  This impacts upon study design, and ethical approval procedures.  There is a need to quantify the numbers of patients willing and able to consent, and compare these with acute general medical controls.  This study aims to address this by identifying: 

  1. The proportion of acute adult toxicology admissions with capacity to consent into research studies
  2. The proportion of eligible patients willing to participate in study designs of increasing complexity compared to the general medical population
  3. The principal barriers and potential facilitators affecting recruitment

Methods

The study followed a matched case-control design.  A random sample of patients were screened and recruited from Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (RIE) Emergency Department (ED) or Acute Medical Unit (AMU) between 24/07/2017 and 06/10/2017.  The treating team were consulted regarding patient suitability and written consent sought from the patient.  Patients were eligible if admitted with any form of acute poisoning, aged over 16, safe to approach, able to provide informed written consent, and not requiring immediate clinical attention.  Age (within 5 years) and gender-matched controls were sourced from the acute general medical cohort.  All patients completed a questionnaire through a one-to-one interview.   No follow-up was required.   All documents were reviewed by a patient representative, registered as an audit with the ED quality improvement team and ethical approval granted by Edinburgh University.   All study data was anonymised and statistically analysed using SPSS.

Results

Of 149 acute toxicology admissions assessed, 109 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria or consenting.  The remaining 40 patients were matched with controls.   The most common reason for exclusion was the patient being too unwell or inappropriate to approach (35.8%).  36.2% of patients were suitable for recruitment and, of these, 74% agreed to participate.  Overall recruitment rate was 26.8%.

Study population was 55% female, median age 40yrs (IQR = 31-75, Range = 18-76), median SIMD quartile 2 (IQR = 2-4.25, Range = 1-5). Paracetamol (58%) was most frequently taken in overdose and 50% of cases involved alcohol.

Statistical analysis demonstrated no statistical significance (using 95% confidence intervals) between the willingness of acute toxicology patients and medical controls to participate in any type of research study.  Waste sample and patient data studies were the most acceptable study designs, and drug trials the least.  Analysis by demographic group demonstrated no statistical difference.  The most common barrier identified was time pressure, the most common facilitator the option to participate from home.  

Discussion and Conclusions:

The sample was demographically representative of acute toxicology admissions in Scotland; mostly young, female, socio-economically deprived and admitted with paracetamol overdose. These results suggest that recruitment among toxicology patients is similar to other medical patients in the acute setting for all study designs and is approximately 26.8%.  Barriers to participation and potential facilitators are also similar. 



The study was registered with the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Emergency Department's Quality Improvement team. Registration number NA. This study did not receive any specific funding. The study was reviewed by Edinburgh University and by Kenneth Boyd, Emeritus Professor of Ethics, and was not deemed to required external ethical approval. Internal ethical approval was granted.
Ailsa Angharad Jane CAMPBELL (Edinburgh, United Kingdom), James DEAR, Rachel O'BRIEN
16:10 - 17:40 #15735 - FP083 Patterns of Heroin Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers.
FP083 Patterns of Heroin Exposures Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers.

Background: Heroin use has been steadily rising according to The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The past year prevalence of heroin use was 0.3 per 100 persons in 2015. There has been a 6.2-fold increase in the total number of deaths due to heroin between 2002 and 2015. We sought to characterize heroin exposures reported to the U.S. National Poison Data System (NPDS).

Methods: The NPDS was queried for all human exposures to heroin reported to the U.S. Poison Centers (PCs) between 2011 and 2017. We descriptively assessed the relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Heroin reports from acute care hospitals and EDs were evaluated. Trends in heroin frequencies and rates (per 100,000 human exposures) were analyzed using Poisson regression methods. Percent changes were reported with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: There were 38,717 heroin exposure calls made to the PCs from 2011 to 2017, with the number of calls increasing from 3,152 to 8,676 during the study period. Single substance exposures accounted for 51.7% of such heroin exposures. Of the total heroin calls, the proportion of calls from acute care hospitals and EDs increased from 69.6% to 76.4% from 2011 to 2017. Multiple substance exposures accounted for 49.4% of the overall heroin calls from acute care hospitals and EDs. Approximately one-fifth of the patients reporting heroin exposures were admitted to the critical care unit (CCU), with 39.8% patients treated and released. Residence was the most common site of exposure (74.8%), and 85.5% of these cases were enroute to the hospital via EMS when the PC was notified. Among the patients, 67.1% were male, with individuals between ages 20 and 39 years (67.7%) predominantly reporting heroin exposures. Intentional abuse (65.3%) and suspected suicides (14.6%) were commonly observed reasons for exposure, with these proportions being 62.5% and 16.9%, respectively, in cases reported by acute care hospitals and EDs. During the study period, the proportion of heroin abuse exposures cases increased (62.2% to 68.5%), while suspected suicides decreased (16.1% to 11.9%). Major effects were seen in 16.7% cases and the case fatality rate for heroin was 3.3%. Notably, there was a 2-fold increase in the number of deaths due to heroin. The most frequently co-occurring substances associated with the cases were benzodiazepines (15.5%) and cocaine (9.6%), while the most common opioid was methadone (2.0%).  Coma (22.1%) and respiratory depression (21.8%) were commonly observed clinical effects. During the study period, the frequency of heroin exposures increased by 175.2% (95% CI: 164.2%, 186.7%; p<0.001), and the rate of heroin exposures increased by 203.9% (95% CI: 150.2%, 269.2%; p<0.001).

Conclusion: There was a significant increase in the reports of heroin exposures reported to the PCs during the study period. The alarming increase may be a result of multiple factors including the cheaper cost of heroin and the growing restrictions on the prescribing of prescription opioids. Greater intervention and awareness initiatives are needed considering the increasing contamination of heroin with fentanyl as well as the severity and rising number of overdose deaths.



n/a
Saumitra REGE (Charlottesville, VA, USA), Anh NGO, Nassima AIT-DAOUD TIOURIRINE, Justin RIZER, Sana SHARMA, Dr Christopher HOLSTEGE
16:10 - 17:40 #15977 - FP084 Can hyperbaric oxygen therapy prevent neuropsychic sequelae after carbon monoxide poisoning.
FP084 Can hyperbaric oxygen therapy prevent neuropsychic sequelae after carbon monoxide poisoning.

Background:

Many studies have shown that carbon monoxide poisoning (COP) is a cause of mid-term neuropsychic sequelae. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as the method of choice to avoid these outcomes. The indications for HBOT remain controversal due to the lack of randomized studies.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of HBOT compared to normobaric oxygen therapy (NBOT) within one month after COP.

Methods:

Prospective study over 13 months from january 2017 to February 2018. Inclusion of patients admitted to emergency department for COP with indication of HBOT. The indications of HBOT were: loss of consciousness, seizures, pregnancy and acute chest pain suggesting of myocardial infarction. Demographic, clinical and biological data were collected. Comparison of two groups: group HBOT = patients who underwent HBOT and group NBOT = patients with indicated but not performed HBOT (main reasons for impossible HBOT were : patients inability to cover HBOT’s cost or technical problems). Patients of both groups had NBOT for 12 hours. Follow-up after one month of index visit. All patients had telephonic interview to detect neuropsychic sequelae: sleep disorders, memory problems, headaches, seizures or depression.

Results:

Inclusion of 113 patients.  Mean age: 37±14 years with female predominance (80%). Poisoning source (%): gas water heater (64.3), brasero (20), gas heater (13).

Group HBOT : n=33. Group NBOT : n=80. The comparative study didn’t show any significant differences between the groups: mean age 39 versus 37 years , median of time of exposure : 64 versus 80 minutes, median of consultation delay  81 minutes versus 80 minutes and mean of Glasgow coma score  14 for both groups.

Significant differences were observed in: mean carboxy-hemoglobin 25±11% versus 19±12% (p=0.055) and lactate concentration: 3.3±2.2 versus 2.4±1.3 (p= 0.06).

No differences were observed between two groups in term of occurrence of insomnia, memory disorders, headaches, seizures or depression.

Conclusion:

Our results didn’t show any differences between HBOT and NBOT in term of occurrence of neuropsychiatric signs after one month. This conclusion suggests continuing the follow-up in order to detect delayed signs. Prolonged NBOT prevents neuropsychiatric complications.

 


Wided DEROUICHE, Sami SOUISSI, Alaa ZAMMITI, Ines CHERMITI (Ben Arous, Tunisia), N NAGLA, Saoussen CHIBOUB, Mohamed MGUIDICHE
16:10 - 17:40 #14559 - FP085 Impact of the relocation of a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
FP085 Impact of the relocation of a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Background: The Sussex trauma network went live in April 2012. Neuroscience services were transferred to the Major Trauma Centre (MTC) on 1st August 2015. This situation offers a unique opportunity to look at the impact of the relocation of a specialist service on major trauma patients.  

This research aims at evaluating the impact of relocating the neuroscience service on major trauma patients by comparing before and after relocation: the demographics of patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) admitted in neurosurgery, the site these patients were first transported to, the type of intervention and the times to first CT head and operation. 

 

Methods: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data submitted to Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) for a major trauma centre in the South East, UK, from 1 August 2013 to 31 July 2017. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 20 or more having a TBI. Cohort 1 includes patients admitted in neurosurgery in the 2 years preceding relocation. Cohort 2 includes patients admitted in neurosurgery in the 2 years following relocation. Patients having a time-critical operation were identified using the neurosurgical theatre and neurosurgical referral registries. Cross-tabulation and percentages were used to determine the demographics and type of neurosurgical input of the samples. Statistical analysis using SPSS was conducted for the site patients were first transported to and the times to first CT head and operation. 

 

Results: Of the 373 patients suffering from a TBI in the 2 years preceding the relocation, 112 (30%) were admitted in neurosurgery. 181 of the 450 patients with a TBI (40%) were admitted in neurosurgery in the 2 years following relocation. The increase in admission occurred for all age groups. Patients

 

Conclusions: The integration of neurosurgery in the MTC has benefited major trauma patients with TBI with a significant increase in admission in neurosurgery for monitoring, a significant increase in the proportion of patients first transported to the MTC and a significant reduction in the time to operation. All trauma patients are likely to have benefited from neurosurgical input indirectly and from the enhanced resources of the MTC. Further research should look at whether the relocation of the neuroscience centre has made a difference in mortality and functional outcomes for patients with TBI.



Funding: This study did not receive any specific funding. Ethical approval and informed consent: Not needed
Cyrille CABARET (Brighton, United Kingdom), Magnus NELSON, Mansoor FOROUGHI
16:10 - 17:40 #14808 - FP086 Ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein blood test predicts absence of intracranial injuries with traumatic brain injury: results of the pivotal alert-tbi multicenter study.
FP086 Ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein blood test predicts absence of intracranial injuries with traumatic brain injury: results of the pivotal alert-tbi multicenter study.

Background: There exists a critical unmet need to improve the assessment and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of injury, death and disability throughout the world.  Despite growing recognition of the importance and potential of biomarkers for TBI, there has been no FDA approved blood tests for TBI or concussion.  Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are two novel biomarker candidates that are highly brain specific and are detectable in the serum shortly after TBI.  In this pivotal clinical study, the utility of measuring serum levels of UCH-L1 and GFAP was evaluated in a population undergoing head CT for the evaluation of mild TBI. 

Methods: A total of 2011 subjects were enrolled in this prospective multi-center study conducted in the United States (67%) and Europe (33%).  Subjects presenting to the ED with suspected TBI underwent blood draw and head CT within 12 hours of injury.  A Neuroimaging Review Committee consisting of three board-certified neuroradiologists conducted an independent, blinded review of each CT scan to determine whether the subject was CT-positive or CT-negative with respect to acute intracranial lesions.  Serum samples were tested for the presence of UCH-L1 and GFAP at 3 independent laboratories blinded to the subject’s diagnosis and clinical status.  Of those enrolled, 1920 had a GCS of 14-15 with a valid head CT and serum sample biomarker result.  A total of 113 of the 1920 (5.9%) had a traumatic intracranial injury on head CT.  The concentration of each target analyte was calculated and reported as below or above the cutoff value for each analyte.  The analyses were performed using a pre-specified multivariate algorithm that combined UCH-L1 and GFAP scores into a single qualitative result.

Results: In those who presented with a GCS of 14 or 15, the assay sensitivity (95% lower CI) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV; 95% lower CI) were determined to be 97.3% (92.4%) and 99.5% (98.7%), respectively, which allowed acceptance of the study alternative hypothesis.  Assay specificity was determined to be 36.7% (34.5%).  Assay performance demonstrated 100.0% sensitivity (N=5) in the neurosurgically manageable lesion (NML) subgroup.   

Conclusion: The results demonstrated the UCH-L1 and GFAP blood test is characterized by both high sensitivity and NPV, which supports clinical utility for ruling out the need for a CT scan in patients with suspected TBI and a negative assay result.



The sponsor of this study is Banyan Biomarkers, Inc. and this work is supported by the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under Contract No. W81XWH-10-C-0251. The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision unless so designated by other documentation.
Peter BIBERTHALER (Munich, Germany), Viktoria BOGNER-FLATZ, Bernd LEIDEL, Robert WELCH, Lawrence LEWIS, Andras BUKI, Pal BARZO, Andreas UNTERBERG, Jeff BAZARIAN
16:10 - 17:40 #14944 - FP087 What is the risk of adverse outcome in patients sustaining minor head injuries while taking direct oral anticoagulants? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
FP087 What is the risk of adverse outcome in patients sustaining minor head injuries while taking direct oral anticoagulants? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Mild head injury is a common presentation to the emergency department and patients taking Direct Oral Anticoagulant medications (DOACs) present a management challenge to clinicians. International guidelines currently recommend computed tomography (CT) head scanning of these patients, regardless of symptoms or signs; but note a lack of evidence to support management decisions.   

This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the current evidence for the risk of adverse outcome in patients taking DOACs following mild head injury.

Methods

A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42017071411) and review methodology followed Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Studies of adult patients with mild head injury (GCS 14-15) taking DOACs, which reported the risk of adverse outcome (death, disability, intracranial lesion) following the head injury were eligible for inclusion.

A comprehensive range of bibliographic databases and grey literature were searched using a sensitive search strategy. Selection of eligible studies was performed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction and risk of bias (using an established critical appraisal tool) was conducted by a single reviewer and checked by a second. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled estimate of the risk of adverse outcome. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

4185 articles were screened for inclusion in the systematic review, of which four cohort studies, including 162 patients, met inclusion criteria. All studies were at moderate or unclear risk of bias secondary to selection bias or inaccurate outcome assessment. Estimates of 30 day adverse outcome ranged from 0% to 7%. A random effects meta-analysis showed a weighted average adverse outcome risk of 3% (95% CI 1-5%, I2=0).

The overall quality of the body of evidence was low due to imprecision, risk of bias and heterogeneity.

Conclusions

There is limited data available to characterise the risk of adverse outcome in patients taking DOACs following mild head injury.

A sufficiently powered prospective cohort study is required to validly define this risk,  identify risk factors for adverse outcome, and inform future head injury guidelines.



Prospero registration No. CRD42017071411
Gordon FULLER, Rachel EVANS (University of Sheffield, United Kingdom), Louise PRESTON, Helen WOODS, Suzanne MASON
16:10 - 17:40 #15531 - FP088 The center-tbi registry: the epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries patients presenting to 55 european hospitals.
FP088 The center-tbi registry: the epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries patients presenting to 55 european hospitals.

BACKGROUND:

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is an important public health challenge but Europe currently lacks robust epidemiological information, with most studies focusing on hospital admissions and ignoring TBI patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). The CENTER-TBI Registry addresses this deficit by including all patients presenting to study centres across Europe.

METHODS:

We prospectively recorded demographic, physiological, injury and outcome data of survival after discharge from the clinical records of TBI patients presenting to 55 participating centres across 18 European countries from 2015 to 2017. This registry is part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER TBI) study. Patients were stratified for the purpose of between-group comparisons within the registry. These being; the “ER stratum” where TBI patients were evaluated solely in the ED and discharged post-computed Tomography (CT) scan without admission, the “admission (ADM) stratum” where patients were admitted to hospital post CT but not to intensive care and the “ICU stratum” where TBI patients were admitted directly from ED or other hospital to the Intensive Care Unit(ICU).

RESULTS:

18 879 TBI patients were enrolled in the registry-9087 (48%) patients in the ER stratum, 6490 (34%) patients in the ADM stratum, and 3302 (17%) TBI patients in ICU stratum.

The median age was 55 years (IQR 32-76 years) on presentation overall, with patients in the ADM strata being older (64 years (IQR 40-81)) than patients in the ER and ICU strata (51 years (IQR 29-73, IQR 32-68)). Patients were predominantly male (60% (95% CI 59.7-61.1)) overall, specifically ICU patients (73%). Low level falls were the most common mechanism of injury (Overall 39%; ER 39%; ADM 46%) and road traffic collisions were commonest in ICU strata patients (36%).

Patients presented with full or slightly impaired consciousness based on the median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on arrival at the ED (15 (IQR14-15)) overall as well as in the ER and ADM strata. ICU stratum patients presented with lower conscious levels (median GCS (IQR) 12(4-15)). Non-reactive pupils were recorded in only 2.4% (95% CI 2.2-2.6) of the cases overall whereas patients in the ICU stratum had the highest rates of non-reactive pupils (11.6% (95% CI 10.5-12.7)). 71.4% (95% CI 70.8-72.1) of CT scans were normal overall while the ICU stratum patients largely had abnormal CT findings (80.7 %(95% CI 79.4-82.1).

Survival to hospital discharge was 95% overall and lower in the ICU stratum (81%).

CONCLUSION:

 Our study has identified that Traumatic Brain Injury currently presents to hospitals in Europe as two diseases: i) Low energy TBI resulting from ground level falls in patients fully conscious at presentation predominates - with older adults often requiring hospital admission; ii) High energy TBI occurs less frequently affecting mainly younger males presenting with impaired consciousness and life- threatening injuries requiring critical care.  This has major implications for clinical training and Trauma Network configuration. 



Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02210221 The European Union FP 7th Framework program (grant 602150)
Fiona LECKY, Olubukola OTESILE (SHEFFIELD, United Kingdom), Ewout STEYERBERG, David K. MENON, Marek MAJDAN, Daan NIEBOER, Marc MAEGELE, Hester F. LINGSMA, Andrew MAAS
16:10 - 17:40 #15576 - FP089 Is advanced trauma life support Classification safe in the borderline severe trauma.
FP089 Is advanced trauma life support Classification safe in the borderline severe trauma.

Introduction :

Post-trauma haemorrhagic shock is the second leading cause of death in severe trauma patients (ST) and evolution can be rapidly cataclysmic.Hereby early assessment is needed to evaluate blood loss and detect patients at risk in time. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) has been offering clinical classification for four stages in this context. However, there is a subclass of clinically stable "Borderline ST" with silent infraclinic tissue hypoperfusion that might be missed by the ATLS classification. The goal of this study was to explore the incidence and the profile of borderline severe trauma patients among clinically stable patients with stages 1 and 2  in the ATLS classification.

Methods  :

We conducted a monocentric prospective study over 33 months. Inclusion of the ST admitted to Emergency resuscitation room depening on high velocity criteria and clinical elements, and classified as ATLS1 and / or ATLS 2. A ST has been classified Borderline (BDL +) if fullfillment of : Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥15 and Base Excess ≤- 4 mmol /l. Comparison of patients (BDL +) and (BDL-). Univariate study was underwent for mortality at day 7 after trauma.

Results :

Inclusion of 379 patients. Median age was 39 ± 18 years. Sex-ratio was 3. Ninety-three trauma patients (24%) were classified Borderline severe trauma. The groups (BDL +) and (BDL-) were comparable for demographic data. However, borderline patients were more severe as demonstrated by the subsequent significantly more frequent need to cirulatory optimization with use of tranexamic acid (Exacyl®), vasoactive drugs and intubation, and a significantly higher Injury severity score in the (BDL +) vs ( BDL-); p <0.001.The univariate analysis of mortality at day 7 after Trauma was  significant (p<0,001) with respective Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals CI[95%] :  of 2,86 [2,86-4,6] for intubation; 6,4[3,7-11] for the use of vasoactive agents and 3,7[1,9-7] for Tranexamic acid use.

Conclusion :

Patients classified ATLS 1 or ATLS2 are shown to be  clinically stable. However in this study one in four of them required subsequent aggressive resuscitation attitude using vasoactive drugs, Exacyl, and intubation. ATLS alone is insufficient and subsequently not safe to estimate severity in Borderline severe trauma. More studies are invited to explore such patients and to reevaluate clinical tools used to assessment.


Hamed RYM (Tunis, Tunisia), Imen MEKKI, Bassem CHTABRI, Houda NASRI, Badra BAHRI, Mohamed KILANI
16:10 - 17:40 #16078 - FP090 Intranasal ketamine for treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED).
FP090 Intranasal ketamine for treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED).

Introduction :

Pain is the most common complaint in the emergency department (ED).The provision of adequate, safe, and timely analgesia is a core component of patient care. At subdissociative doses,ketamine maintains potent analgesic effects with preservation of protective airway reflexes,  spontaneous respiration, and cardiopulmonary stability .

Objective of the study :

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early administration oflow-dose intranasal ketamine analgesic agents in patients with moderate to severe pain in the ED in reducing the need for opioid or class III analgesic agents.

Materials and Methods :

It is a randomized, prospective, double blind, controlled, multicentric trial. The trial was conducted in three community teaching hospitals over two years.The study includes patients aged 18 to 60 years who presented to the ED with acute limb trauma pain and visual analogic scale (VAS) of 5 or more.

In the triage area, each patient received 0.3 mg/kg of intranasal ketamineor intranasal placebo. At ED admission we collected vital signs, demographic,clinical data. VAS was measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes.

Primary end points includedpain resolution defined as a decrease of VAS more than 50% of baseline values 30 minutes following protocol treatment administration. Secondary endpoints included need for rescue analgesia,and adverse events rate.

Results

The study enrolled 1079 patients with median age of 37years and sex ratio (M/F) 1.32. Overall, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for initial VAS. Pain resolution was obtained in261 patients (50%) with intranasal ketamine versus 236 patients (42%)with placebo (p=0.012).Rescue analgesia by morphine was higher in the placebo group compared to ketamine group (6% vs2.9 %; p=0.03). Dizziness was more frequent in ketamine group( 21.5% vs 12.7% ; p<0.01); as disorientation ( 5.7% in ketaminegroup vs 0.4% in placebo group ; p<0.01).

Conclusion: 

This study suggests that intra nasal ketamine, can significantly reduce the need for opioids in the treatment of acute pain.


Khaoula BEL HAJ ALI (Monastir, Tunisia), Mohamed Amine MSOLLI, Nadia BEN BRAHIM, Kaouther BELTAIEF, Mohamed Habib GRISSA, Wahid BOUIDA, Semir NOUIRA

17:40
17:40-18:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

BGM
RCEM Annual General Assembly
for Members only

RCEM Annual General Assembly
for Members only

Wednesday 12 September
Time Clyde Auditorium Lomond Auditorium Room Alsh #1 Room Alsh #2 Room Boisdale Room Carron Room Etive Room Forth Room Fyne Room Gala Room M4
08:00
08:00-08:30
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A40
KEYNOTE LECTURE 3
Philosophy of Emergency Medicine

KEYNOTE LECTURE 3
Philosophy of Emergency Medicine

Speaker: Dr David CARR (Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Toronto Canada, Canada)

08:40
08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A41
EDUCATION
Teaching knowledge that lies between the lines-the hidden curriculum in emergency medicine

EDUCATION
Teaching knowledge that lies between the lines-the hidden curriculum in emergency medicine

Moderators: Eric DRYVER (Consultant) (Lund, Sweden), Cornelia HÄRTEL (Medical Director of the ED, Consultant in EM, Director of Medical Education in EM) (STOCKHOLM, Sweden)
Coordinator: Senad TABAKOVIC (Coordinator, Zürich, Switzerland)
08:40 - 10:10 Of Horses, Zebras and Chameleons: Diagnostic Reasoning in Emergency Medicine1. Eric DRYVER (Consultant) (Speaker, Lund, Sweden)
08:40 - 10:10 The hidden curriculum in emergency medicine, or how norms, values, and beliefs can shape the future of our specialty. Aristomenis EXADAKTYLOS (Chair and Clinical Director) (Speaker, Bern, Switzerland, Switzerland)
08:40 - 10:10 Emergingleadership. Ruth BROWN (Speaker) (Speaker, London)

08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B41
NEUROLOGICAL
Headache, spinning and vague symptoms

NEUROLOGICAL
Headache, spinning and vague symptoms

Moderators: Tobias BECKER (Speaker) (Jena, Germany), Peter JOHNS (Speaker) (Ottawa, Canada)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
08:40 - 10:10 When to worry about a headache: The impact of the Ottawa SAH Rule. Jeff PERRY (Physician) (Speaker, Ottawa, Canada)
08:40 - 10:10 The Big 3 Diagnoses of Vertigo: Practical tips on performing bedside testing of the dizzy patient. Peter JOHNS (Speaker) (Speaker, Ottawa, Canada)
08:40 - 10:10 Possible Meningitis - LP on vague symptoms and immediate treatment? Annmarie LASSEN (Professor in Emergency medicine) (Speaker, Odense, Denmark)

08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D41
Being a better emergency doctor
What makes a good EM doc great? Unique tips and tricks for YOU - YEMD Session

Being a better emergency doctor
What makes a good EM doc great? Unique tips and tricks for YOU - YEMD Session

Moderators: Martynas GEDMINAS (Physician / Quality control) (Šiauliai, Lithuania), Incifer KANBUR (Assistant doctor) (Istanbul, Turkey)
08:40 - 10:10 Building a culture of quality. Lucas CHARTIER (Deputy Medical Director) (Speaker, Toronto, Canada)
08:40 - 10:10 Multitasking in the ED. Dr Pieter Jan VAN ASBROECK (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Genk, Belgium)
08:40 - 10:10 Boosting human performance for optimal results. Martynas GEDMINAS (Physician / Quality control) (Speaker, Šiauliai, Lithuania)
08:40 - 10:10 What makes a great team great. Dr Atriham ADAN (Medical Director, Emergency Department) (Speaker, Houston Texas - USA, USA)

08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E41
RESEARCH
Interactive Session

RESEARCH
Interactive Session

Moderators: Barbra BACKUS (Emergency Physician) (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Berlin, Germany)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
08:40 - 10:10 Flash mob research. Said LARIBI (PU-PH, chef de pôle) (Speaker, Tours, France)
08:40 - 10:10 European Emergency Medicine registries. Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN (Chair of EuSEM Research Committee) (Speaker, ANKARA, Turkey)
08:40 - 10:10 Research dissemination (knowledge translation); academic training. Alasdair GRAY (Speaker, Edinburgh, United Kingdom), Said LARIBI (PU-PH, chef de pôle) (Speaker, Tours, France), Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN (Chair of EuSEM Research Committee) (Speaker, ANKARA, Turkey)

08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C41
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Smart IT and quality registries: lessons from the Nordic countries

NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Smart IT and quality registries: lessons from the Nordic countries

Moderators: Basar CANDER (Turkey), Katrin HRUSKA (Emergency Physician) (Stockholm, Sweden)
Coordinator: Pr Rick BODY (Coordinator, Manchester)
08:40 - 10:10 Emergency medicine today: Feasibility of evidence-based medicine electronic decision support. Ari PALOMÄKI (Professor) (Speaker, Hämeenlinna, Finland)
08:40 - 10:10 Workload in emergency department reduced by participating in development of local electronic health software. David THORISSON (Physician) (Speaker, Kópavogur, Iceland)
08:40 - 10:10 How to use registries to improve quality of care. Pr Lisa KURLAND (speaker) (Speaker, Örebro, Sweden)

08:40-10:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F41
FREE PAPER 11
Infectious Disease / Sepsis

FREE PAPER 11
Infectious Disease / Sepsis

Moderators: Colin GRAHAM (Director and Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Hong Kong, Hong Kong), Jason SMITH (PHYSICIAN) (Plymouth, United Kingdom)
08:40 - 10:10 #14781 - FP091 Prognostic impact of successful immediate intensive care interventions within the emergency department in septic patients.
FP091 Prognostic impact of successful immediate intensive care interventions within the emergency department in septic patients.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of response to immediate short-term intensive care therapy within the Emergency Department (ED) on mortality of septic patients.

Methods

This is a prospective single center study on a cohort of septic patients in an urban academic Emergency Department (ED) with about 36.000 patients per year and an inpatient rate of 55%. In this center all emergency patients are seen and treated in the ED. Direct tranferrals on the ICU do not occur. The ED offers six beds for immediate and short-term intensive care therapy. In the study, patients were assessed by nurses at arrival and triaged according to the EmergencySeverityIndex. In case of suspicion of sepsis according to the SIRS criteria they were immediately admitted to a monitor bed in the ED based intensive care area, received a q-SOFA and MEWS scoring and were treated according to current sepsis guidelines. Patients above 18 years and a final diagnosis of sepsis (according to ICD-10-coding) have been included in the study. Vital signs have been measured with GE Healthcare Solar 8000M and treatment effects on vital signs including q-SOFA parameters were assessed after 4 hours of ED based intensive care and compared with the measurements at the beginning of the treatment period. Data were collected from April to October 2015.

Results

117 patients with sepsis were identified in the study period of 6th month. The overall in hospital mortality of this group was 14,5%(n=17). Patients with a q-SOFA ≤ 1 at the beginning of the treatment period had a mortality of 8,3%.

When only those patients with a q-SOFA > 2 at the beginning of the treatment period were analyzed (38,5%;n=45) the mortality in this group was 24,4%(p<0,05) which was significantly higher than the the overall mortality of all septic patients. Successful initial intensive treatment in ED had a profound effect on mortality in this group. An improvement of the initial q-SOFA-score ≥2 within four hours to a qSOFA-score ≤1 (27 out of 45) correlated with a mortality of 7,4%(n=2) which was not significantly different from those patients with a q-SOFA ≤ 1at ED arrival. However, in those cases without successful improvement of q-SOFA and a score of ≥ 2 after 4 hours intensive ED treatment (40%;n=18) mortality was 50% (n=9) with 50% of the patients dying within the first 3 days of hospital stay.

Conclusions

This study shows that ED based early intensive care intervention in severely septic patients can downgrade q-SOFA scores ≥ 2 to sofa score ≤ 1 within 4 hours in more than 50% of patients. Furthermore, the treatment response in this period is a strong prognostic factor. Good treatment reactivity profoundly reduces the risk of in hospital mortality to levels of septic patients with an initial q-SOFA ≤ 1 at ED arrival. Thus, successful early ED based intense sepsis treatment helps to reduce mortality and allows discriminating those patients who will need further ICU treatment from those who can be treated without using further ICU resources.


Florian PUNDY (Vienna, Austria), Cornelia HÄRTEL, Christoph DODT
08:40 - 10:10 #15741 - FP093 Intravenous versus oral paracetamol for acute pain in adults in pre hospital: a prospective randomised trial.
FP093 Intravenous versus oral paracetamol for acute pain in adults in pre hospital: a prospective randomised trial.

Objective To determine if intravenous paracetamol was superior to oral paracetamol in the management of moderate pain in out of hospital setting.

 

Methods:

This was a prospective, randomized, preliminary study over 3 months.

We Included adult patients (age >14ans), with mild to moderate pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) = <6). They received analgesia with 1 gram of paracetamol and this in the absence of contraindication to the prescription of the product or its oral form (a known allergy to paracetamol, hepatocellular insufficiency, renal insufficiency, deterioration of the Consciousness). The patients were randomly assigned to receive either the intravenous paracetamol (IV group) or oral paracetamol (PO group).

Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, visual analogue scale (VAS), paracetamolemia before taking medication and thirty minutes afterwards were collected.

The primary judgement criterion was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain reduction at 30 min. A clinically significant change in pain was defined as 15 mm.

Our secondary endpoint is the difference of paracetamolemia 30 minutes after administration of the drug in both groups. A value of p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

Twenty patients were identified, 7 in PO group and 13 in IV group. Male predominance was noted (sex ratio = 1.5), mean age was 32.8 old  years +/- 16. No significant difference was demonstrated in this trial with intravenous paracetamol compared with oral paracetamol in terms of the average of pain scale reduction at 30 minute (42.5 +/- 12.81 mm in PO group vs 38.33 +/- 15.85 mm in IV group; p=0.54). However, a significant difference in paracetamolemia at 30 minutes was noted between the two groups (4.33 +/- 3.39 mg/l in PO group vs 18.58 +/- 7.4 mg/l in IV group; p< 0.01).

Conclusions:

Our preliminary study, showed a better bioavailability of the IV form of Paracetamol. However there was no significant difference in analgesia. Multicenter studies including a larger number of patients are needed in order to confirm this result.


Saida ZELFANI, Hela MANAI (Tunis, Tunisia), Yosray RIAHI, Yasmine WALHA, Ons LANDOLSI, Wafa LIMAM, Mounir DAGHFOUS
08:40 - 10:10 #14947 - FP094 Impact of rapid influenza diagnostic tests in the emergency department in patients with influenza-like-illness.
FP094 Impact of rapid influenza diagnostic tests in the emergency department in patients with influenza-like-illness.

Background: During winter season, influenza viruses are responsible for a large proportion of acute respiratory illness in emergency department (ED) patients. To confirm the diagnosis of an influenza virus infection, standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is accurate but takes at least 24 hrs to have the results available. In ED patients, it is important to decide timely whether a patient has to be isolated due to influenza virus infection in case of in-house admission. Rapid PCR tests have equivalent diagnostic accuracy to standard PCRs but produce a result in less than one hour. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of influenza virus infection in ED patients with influenza-like-illness and to identify risk factors for in-house admission.   

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we enrolled consecutively ED patients with influenza-like-illness from two winter seasons (December to April 2015/16 and 2016/2017). During the ED stay, these patients were isolated according to the guidelines for acute respiratory illness. In case of in-house admission, rapid PCR tests were performed in these patients. The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of influenza virus infections and secondary, to identify signs and symptoms as well as further predictors that were associated with in-house admission due to the influenza virus infection. Descriptive, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.  

Results: The rapid PCR test was performed in 842 ED patients with influenza-like-illness who were supposed to be admitted in-house. Hundred-eighty-two patients (21.6%) were influenza positive, mostly influenza A (n=149). There was no difference in age between influenza positive and negative patients (median 60 vs. 63 years), in contrast more female patients were influenza positive (48.4% vs. 38.8%). Mostly a symptomatic treatment was sufficient, whereas influenza positive tested ED patients received more often antiviral therapy comparing to negative tested patients (36.8% vs. 1.8%). Three main symptoms leading to ED presentations were: 68.5% coughing, 52.9% fatigue and 44.9% dyspnea. Female ED patients (p=0.039) presenting with cough (p<0.001), fever (p=0.002) and myalgia (p=0.010) were at increased risk for an influenza virus infection. If dyspnea was additionally present to these symptoms, ED patients were more likely to have an influenza virus caused pneumonia when presenting in the ED (p=0.006). Senior ED patients (p<0.001) with influenza virus infection, known coronary heart diseases (p<0.001) and symptoms such as fatigue (p<0.001) and dyspnea (p<0.001) were identified to be at high risk for in-house admission.

Discussion & Conclusion: The rapid PCR test was positive in every fifth ED patient with influenza-like-illness and the likelihood increased if symptoms like cough, fever and myalgia led to ED presentation. Rapid PCR tests are useful to plan rapid isolation measures in case of in-house admission to avoid contamination of other patients, to identify ED patients at risk for pneumonia and to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use but increase focused use of antiviral therapies if needed.



No trial registration because it is a retrospective analysis and not a trial. Ksenija Slankamenac received a career grant funding by the Promedica Foundation, Chur. Ethical approval was given (2017-01316).
Dr Ksenija SLANKAMENAC (Zurich, Switzerland), Severin SIMMLER, Lanja SALEH, Dagmar I. KELLER
08:40 - 10:10 #15065 - FP095 The prognostic value of qSOFA: a systematic review.
FP095 The prognostic value of qSOFA: a systematic review.

Background

Sepsis was redefined as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” in 2016. As the concept of systemic inflammatory response was superseded, a new clinical criterion for identifying patients with high risk of organ dysfunction – the quick Sepsis-related/ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score - was recommended. qSOFA consists of altered mentation, tachypnoea (respiratory rate ≥22 bpm) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤100mmHg). The aim of this systemic review was to review the existing evidence to determine the validity of qSOFA in the prediction of prognosis to justify its use in the emergency setting.

 

Methods

All studies that recruited adult patients where qSOFA was calculated and reported were included, except case series, case reports and conference abstracts. Studies that only included patients with neutropenic fever were excluded. Literature search strategies were developed using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and text words related to qSOFA. The Cochrane Central of Controlled trials, EMBASE, BIOSIS, OVID MEDLINE, OVID Nursing Database and the Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database were searched using the OVID interface. The WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov were searched independently. Risks of biases were assessed using an adapted version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies instrument. The validity of qSOFA was determined by comparing the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting in-hospital mortality. Prognosis was defined as in-hospital mortality, which was also our primary outcome. Other outcomes include 28/30 day mortality, ICU admissions, ICU length-of-stay, hospital length-of-stay, and diagnosis of sepsis.

 

Results

Our search identified 529 records. After duplicates were removed, 251 records were screened and 43 papers were included in the final analysis.

 

For in-hospital mortality AUC, we reviewed 26 studies that had 381,029 subjects and found the median to be 0.68 and ranged from 0.55-0.82. In-hospital mortality median sensitivity and specificity was 0.53 and 0.83; it was compiled with data from 22 studies with 116,490 patients, ranging from 0.16-0.98 and 0.19-0.97 respectively. Positive and negative predicted values ranged from 0.07-0.4 and 0.89-0.99 respectively. Selection bias and bias in definition were the most common biases. The included studies differed mostly on altered mentation and how this was determined.

Meta-analysis of 376,723 subjects confirmed high heterogeneity among studies (I²=99.0%, 95%CI 98.8-99.1). Caution must be exercised when interpreting the results of the pooled in-hospital mortality AUC of 0.69 (95%CI 0.66–0.71).

 

Discussion

For screening scores or systems to be useful in the emergency setting, sensitivity of the test should be high to ensure that potentially critically ill patients are not missed. qSOFA may have been suggested to be a useful predictor of organ dysfunction, however our systematic review shows that it is not a clinically reliable score clinically for predicting patients for in-hospital mortality. 



This project is registered with PROSPERO 2017 (CRD42017063976) This study did not receive any specific funding
Ronson Sze Long LO (Hong Kong, Hong Kong), Ling Yan LEUNG, Kevin Kei Ching HUNG, Mikkel BRABRAND, Suet Yi CHAN, Chun Yu YEUNG, Colin GRAHAM
08:40 - 10:10 #15116 - FP096 Clinical and cerebrospinal fluid findings of children with suspected central nervous system infection in the emergency department.
FP096 Clinical and cerebrospinal fluid findings of children with suspected central nervous system infection in the emergency department.

Background and Objectives

Lumbar puncture (LP) is an emergency department (ED) procedure for evaluating children with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection. We aimed to determine whether extensive testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained from pediatric ED patients was useful and to demonstrate the distribution of abnormal bacterial or viral pathogens.

 Methods

Charts of all patients who underwent LP in a children’s hospital ED between January 2014 and December 2017 were reviewed. Patients demographics, clinical characteristics, complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and CSF results (bacterial culture, viral serology and biochemistry) were recorded. Based on the CSF findings patients were categorized into three groups; normal CSF, abnormal CSF indicating viral meningitis (VM) / encephalitis, and abnormal CSF indicating bacterial meningitis (BM). 

Results

A total of 260,000 patients were presented to the PED during the study period, LP were ordered to perform for 130 of them (1/2000). However, 23 patients for consent issues, and 6 patents with missing data were excluded. Final analysis performed for 101 patients; the mean age was 48 ± 12 months and 60 (59%) were males. The most common causes for ordering LP were altered mental status (36%) and fever without source (25%). Normal CSF was detected in 45% of the patients, CSF indicating of VM or encephalitis in 41% and BM in 14%. Patients with abnormal CSF indicating BM were more likely to have headache and less likely to have seizure (respectively p = 0.012, p = 0.023). No patient with seizure had CSF findings indicating VM. The mean age, absolute neutrophil count and CRP values were higher in patients with abnormal CSF indicating BM (p = 0.001, p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). Bacterial cultures grew 5 pathogens in 8 patients ( 2 Pneumococcus, 2 Hemophilus influenza non-type b, 2 Neisseria meningitidis, 1 Escherichia coli and 1 Streptococcus Hominis) whereas only three viral agents were detected in  8 patients (6 Enteroviruses, 1 HSV type 1 and 1 HHV 6).

Conclusion

Since the results of LPs contributed directly to patient management in majority of cases, either by identifying an organism, allowing unnecessary antibiotics/antivirals to be stopped after 24 hours, or by permitting an earlier discharge from the ED, it should not be delayed when clinical and laboratory tests indicating CNS infections.


Dr Ali YURTSEVEN (İzmir, Turkey), Caner TURAN, Zümrüt BAL, Aydemir SABIRE SOHRET, Eylem Ulas SAZ
08:40 - 10:10 #15546 - FP097 Prospective validation of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) for mortality among patients with infection admitted to an emergency department.
FP097 Prospective validation of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) for mortality among patients with infection admitted to an emergency department.

Background

An international task force has suggested the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score instead of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to identify patients with high risk of mortality. Only few studies have evaluated the new sepsis criteria prospectively in emergency department (ED) settings.

Purpose

To determine the prognostic value of qSOFA compared to SIRS in predicting 28-day mortality in a prospective study of infected patients admitted to an ED.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study of all infected patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the ED of Slagelse Hospital during October 1 to December 31 2017. The ED is a tertiary care center with 26,500 visits per year. All patients with suspected or documented infection on arrival to the ED, and who treated with antibiotics, were included. Admission variables included in the SIRS- and qSOFA criteria were prospectively obtained from triage forms. Survival status after 28 days from admission was obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System. The diagnostic performance of qSOFA and SIRS score for predicting 28-day mortality was assessed by analyses of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

A total of 1,075 patients (50.4% male) were included. The median age was 73 years (interquartile range 59-83 years). A total of 91 (8.5%) met at least two qSOFA criteria, and 523 (48.7%) met at least two SIRS criteria on admission. The overall 28-day mortality was 9.7% (95% CI 8.1-11.7%). Unadjusted odds ratio of qSOFA and SIRS for 28-day mortality was 4.0 (95% CI 2.4-6.8) vs 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.4).

A qSOFA score of at least two for predicting 28-day mortality had a sensitivity of 23.1% (95% CI 15.4 -32.4%), a specificity of 93.1% (95% CI 91.3-94.6%), a PPV and NPV of 26.4% (95% CI 17.7 -36.7%) and 91.9% (95% CI 90.0-93.5%), respectively. A SIRS score of at least two for predicting 28-day mortality had a sensitivity of 58.7 (95% CI 48.6-68.2%), a specificity of 52.4% (95% CI 49.2-55.6%), a PPV and NPV of 11.7% (95% CI 9.0-14.7%) and 92.2% (95% CI 89.7-94.3%), respectively. The AUC for qSOFA and SIRS was 0.58 (95% CI 0.54-0.62) vs 0.55 (95% CI 0.50-0.61).

Conclusion

Use of qSOFA had improved specificity, but with poor sensitivity, in predicting in 28-day mortality.  qSOFA and SIRS showed similar discrimination potential for mortality.



The study received financial support from Region Zealand Health Research Foundation (RSSF), Denmark and “Naestved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals” Research Fund, Denmark.
Dr S M Osama Bin ABDULLAH (Copenhagen, Denmark), Rune Husås SØRENSEN, Lothar WIESE, Ram Benny Christian DESSAU, Saifullah Muhammed Rafid Us SATTAR, Finn Erland NIELSEN
08:40 - 10:10 #15669 - FP098 sVEGFR2: a new triage biomarker for patient with suspected sepsis upon emergency department admission.
FP098 sVEGFR2: a new triage biomarker for patient with suspected sepsis upon emergency department admission.

Background:

Patients experiencing sepsis can rapidly develop organ dysfunctions whose intensity and duration have been linked with deleterious outcomes. In addition, a substantial proportion of sepsis survivors suffer from long-term sequelae, such as recurrent sepsis with hospital readmissions, functional and cognitive impairments, increased cardiovascular and renal complications and overall a decreased life expectancy. As early management of sepsis has been proven successful, accurate triage of these patient when admitted to hospital is key. While, no biomarker is available, endothelial damage plays a major role in the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction and biomarkers associated with this early sepsis events could be an early sign of worsening in ED.

Objectives:

We investigated whether biomarkers could predict the deterioration of in patients admitted at emergency department with a suspected infection.

 Methods:

TRIAGE was a prospective, multicentre (14 sites in France and Belgium) observational study. Adult patients admitted in the ED with a suspected infection and at least 2 SIRS criteria were included. Blood samples were collected at 0, 6 and 24 hours after patient admission. Main outcome was subsequent deterioration (defined as any of the following: death, ICU admission, increase of SOFA score) within 72 h. This primary endpoint was assessed by an independent adjudication committee of sepsis experts including emergency physicians and intensivists. Biomarkers association with primary endpoint and prognostic performances were assessed with and without adjustment on clinical variables such as age, sex, Charlson score, SOFA score, qSOFA, lactates, using logistic regression models. AUC under the ROC curve and their 95% confidence interval were computed using DeLong’s method. Predictive performances (sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive Value, Predictive Positive Value) were assessed using classification threshold optimized for high sensitivity.

Results:

sVEGFR2 and sUPAR protein levels were measured in 462 ED patients with a suspected infection at 3 time points: H0 (patient’s admission), H6 and H24. Of these 462 patients, 124 (27%) worsened within the 72-hour study period. Compared with other biomarkers, the sVEGFR2/sUPAR protein combination was the most differentially expressed between worsening and non-worsening patients at H0 and H6 (p-value= 2.19e-10, and 2.36e-6, respectively, Mann-Whitney test).Interestingly, based on the new definition of sepsis (sepsis 3), 233 patients of our cohort were no longer considered as sepsis patients at enrolment (SOFA<2 at inclusion). Of these, 36 (15%) however developed organ dysfunction within the 72-hour study period. Again, the combination of sVEGFR2 and sUPAR protein levels was, at inclusion (H0), the best predictor of worsening (AUC=0.73, sensitivity= 0.92, NPV=0.95), compared with other biomarkers, CRP (AUC=0.57), Lactates (AUC=0.48), qSOFA (AUC=0.54) and PCT (AUC=0.61). Moreover, this performance was increased at H6 (AUC=0.79, sensitivity=0.94, NPV=0.98).

Conclusion:

While no vital signs nor clinical score or parameters can predict worsening of non-severe patients (SOFA<2 at inclusion), the expression of the sVEGFR2 alone or combined with sUPAR significantly predicts their progression to more severe status, within 72 hours after their admission to the emergency department. Such biomarker(s) could enhance early identification of severe patients in the ED for an appropriate and rapid management in order to decrease risks of deleterious outcome.



ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02739152
Marie-Angelique CAZALIS (LYON), Christine VALLEJO, Thomas LAFON, Karim TAZAROURTE, Marion DOUPLAT, Pierre-François LATERRE, Franck VERSCHUREN, Said LARIBI, Valérie GISSOT, Thomas DAIX, Arnaud DESACHY, Thomas DESMETTRE, Anais COLONNA, Maxime MAIGNAN, Mustapha SEBBANE, Jacques REMIZE, Caroline ANNOOT, Agathe PANCHER, Khalil TAKUN, Yves LAMBERT, Olivier DUPEUX, Laurence BARBIER, Bruno FRANÇOIS
08:40 - 10:10 #15689 - FP099 Elevated serum PCT in patients with suspected infection can help to predict septic shock evolution at emergency department admission.
FP099 Elevated serum PCT in patients with suspected infection can help to predict septic shock evolution at emergency department admission.

Background

An accurate assessment of septic patients at risk for deterioration  is challenging for clinicians in the emergency department (ED). Even so, early recognition of life-threatening conditions could result in improved outcomes.

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with a suspected infection in the ED for predicting septic shock within 72 hours.

Patients and Methods

TRIAGE was a prospective, multicentre (14 sites in France and Belgium) observational study. Adult patients admitted in the ED with a suspected infection and at least 2 SIRS criteria were included. Blood samples were collected at 0, 6 and 24 hours after patient arrival. Accuracy and prognostic performances of biomarkers were assessed along with clinical variables such as age, sex, Charlson score, SOFA score, qSOFA, lactates, using logistic regression models. AUC under the ROC curve and their 95% confidence interval were computed using DeLong’s method. Predictive performances (sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive Value, Predictive Positive Value) were assessed using classification threshold optimized for high sensitivity.

Results

Serum PCT was measured in 462 ED patients with a suspected infection at 3 time points: H0 (patient’s admission), H6 and H24. Of these 462 patients, 12 (2.6%) developed a septic shock within the 72-hour study period. PCT and Lactates were the most differentially expressed markers at H0 between patients that developed septic shock or not (p-value<0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). Multivariate analysis showed that PCT and Lactates were independent prognostic factors of septic shock occurrence (IQR OR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19, P= 0.0005 and IQR OR: 1.47, 95%CI: 0.94-2.11, P = 0.049, respectively). Moreover, PCT protein level was, at inclusion (H0), the best predictor of septic shock (AUC=0.91 (0.85 - 0.98), sensitivity= 1, specificity=0.63, for a PCT threshold of 2.52ng/mL), compared with other biomarkers, Lactates (AUC=0.86 (0.78 - 0.93)), CRP (AUC=0.63 (0.48 - 0.77), or score SOFA (AUC=0.78 (0.65 – 0.91)).

Conclusion

Early prognostic assessment in sepsis in ED is essential to adjust therapeutic protocols, prevent deterioration and reduce mortality. In this context, PCT showed good performances in identifying patients at-risk of septic shock among patients suspected of infection at ED admission



ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02739152
Marie-Angelique CAZALIS (LYON), Christine VALLEJO, Caroline ANNOOT, Laurence BARBIER, Anais COLONNA, Thomas DAIX, Arnaud DESACHY, Thomas DESMETTRE, Marion DOUPLAT, Olivier DUPEUX, Valérie GISSOT, Thomas LAFON, Yves LAMBERT, Said LARIBI, Pierre-François LATERRE, Maxime MAIGNAN, Agathe PANCHER, Jacques REMIZE, Mustapha SEBBANE, Khalil TAKUN, Karim TAZAROURTE, Franck VERSCHUREN, Bruno FRANÇOIS

10:10 - 10:40 POSTER HIGHLIGHT SESSIONS - VISIT OF THE EXHIBITION - COFFEE
10:40
10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A42
NEUROLOGICAL
Neurology without neurology - how to grab with a numb hand

NEUROLOGICAL
Neurology without neurology - how to grab with a numb hand

Moderators: Tobias BECKER (Speaker) (Jena, Germany), Jeff PERRY (Physician) (Ottawa, Canada)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
10:40 - 12:10 Who is at high risk for a subsequent stroke following a TIA/non-disabling stroke and how to minimize this risk. Jeff PERRY (Physician) (Speaker, Ottawa, Canada)
10:40 - 12:10 You see it, they feel it, few know it: Common vertigo syndromes rarely diagnosed. Peter JOHNS (Speaker) (Speaker, Ottawa, Canada)
10:40 - 12:10 Find the chameleon in the head - the small clot in the cerebral sinuses. Andy NEILL (Doctor) (Speaker, Dublin, Ireland)

10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

B42
MEET THE EDITORS
Journal editors explain how to get published!

MEET THE EDITORS
Journal editors explain how to get published!

Moderator: Martin FANDLER (Consultant) (Bamberg, Germany, Germany)
Coordinator: Christian HOHENSTEIN (Coordinator, BAD BERKA, Germany)
10:40 - 12:10 Biomarkers. Pr Martin MÖCKEL (Head of Department, Professor) (Speaker, Berlin, Germany)
10:40 - 12:10 EJEM. Colin GRAHAM (Director and Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Hong Kong, Hong Kong)
10:40 - 12:10 EMJ. Ellen WEBER (I have no idea what this means) (Speaker, San Francisco, USA)

10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

D42
Research & best young abstracts
All about research and presenting the best young abstracts - YEMD Session

Research & best young abstracts
All about research and presenting the best young abstracts - YEMD Session

Moderators: Felix LORANG (Consultant) (Erfurt, Germany), Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Paris, France)
10:40 - 12:10 Research is wasted! Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Speaker, Paris, France)
10:40 - 12:10 #15013 - Y01 Pathways of care for adult mental health emergency department attendances – Analysis of routine data.
Y01 Pathways of care for adult mental health emergency department attendances – Analysis of routine data.

Background

The management of patients with mental health problems in Emergency Departments (ED) has been of concern for some time. To identify where interventions could be most effectively targeted we must first understand when, why, and how mental health patients use EDs. Previous studies are largely based on data collected from single study sites using relatively small sample sizes, raising questions about the generalisability of these findings.

We conducted a retrospective multi-site analysis of routinely available data to understand the pathways of care of mental health attendances through the ED and their outcomes.

Methods

Routine NHS patient level data for adult ED attendances across 18 EDs in Yorkshire and Humber (Y&H) for a one year period from January 2014 to December 2014 were analysed.

Identification of mental health patients was based on identifying mental health string terms within both the ED diagnosis and presenting complaint fields (as ED diagnosis might not always classify a mental health crisis if there was also a physical health problem): (1) the first diagnosis variable was independently searched by two people for a comprehensive list of all mental health terms. Those patients with a mental health term in this variable then had their presenting complaint variable searched to identify any further terms; (2) identified terms were used to search all nine diagnosis variables and presenting complaint variable; (3) Mental health attendances were split into three categories (psychiatric, overdose/self-harm, and anxiety) reflecting the differing clinical support required.

Age, mode and time of arrival, number of investigations and treatments, length of ED stay and ED outcome were analysed. Comparative analyses of mental health and non-mental health patients were undertaken.

Results

Of the 1,312,539 ED attendances, 3.1% (n=39,594) were mental health related. Of the mental health patients 55.9% (n=22,167) were categorised as self-harm/overdose; 31.8% (n=12,597) psychiatric; and 12.2% (n=4,830) anxiety. Mental health patients were more likely to arrive by ambulance than non-mental health patients (OR 3.25, 95% CI 3.18-3.32), to arrive out-of-hours (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.90-1.99), to leave the ED before treatment or refuse treatment (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.85-304) and once in the ED had a significantly longer length of stay (Median: mental health = 178 minutes vs non-mental health = 139 minutes, p<0.001). 72.7% of the psychiatric sub-group received no investigations compared to 22.6% of the overdose / self-harm and 37.5% of the anxiety sub-groups. 51.2% of the psychiatric sub-group received no treatment or advice only compared to 22.8% of the overdose / self-harm and 34.5% of the anxiety sub-groups.

Discussion/Conclusion

Our analysis showed mental health patients are placing a small but significant burden on emergency care services and are receiving poorer levels of care than other patients. Improving the availability of alternative mental health services in the community, particularly during the out-of-hours period, could improve outcomes for these patients. Also, increased training for ED and ambulance service staff in the identification of patients with mental health problems, with clear referral pathways for these patients, may improve mental health patient’s experiences of the ED.



Funding: The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Yorkshire and Humber (CLAHRC YH): Avoiding Attendances and Admissions in Long Term Conditions Theme (AAA). The views expressed are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Ethics: A UK National Research Ethics committee granted ethical approval for the data analysis (REC ref: 14/YH/1139) and Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) approval was also obtained (CAG ref: 4/CAG/1015).
Suzanne ABLARD (Sheffield, United Kingdom), Richard JACQUES, Colin O'KEEFFE, Susan CROFT, Suzanne MASON
10:40 - 12:10 #15171 - Y02 Risk of short-term neurologic complications in children who present a post-traumatic seizure following minor head trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Y02 Risk of short-term neurologic complications in children who present a post-traumatic seizure following minor head trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Although post-traumatic seizures (PTS) have been associated with an increased risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI), the risk in children with an immediate PTS and a normal Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) following blunt head trauma has not been rigorously evaluated.

Objective: Our aim was to determine the frequency of short-term neurologic complications in children with PTS and a normal GCS following blunt head trauma.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies reporting on children ≤ 18 years with an immediate PTS and a GCS of 15 at the time of assessment. Two investigators independently reviewed identified articles for inclusion, assessed quality and extracted relevant data. Our main outcomes were the presence of any TBI on neuroimaging, the need for emergent neurosurgery or death due to head injury. We performed random effect meta-analyses and assessed heterogeneity across studies.

Results: Of 9,956 studies screened, the 7 that met inclusion criteria included 66,202 head injured children of which 439 children (0.7%) had GCS of 15, an immediate PTS and underwent acute neuroimaging. The risk of any TBI on neuroimaging was 13.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-26.1; I2=81%) although only 2.3% required emergent neurosurgery (n=4 studies; 95% CI 0.0-9.9; I2=86%). No child died.

Conclusion: Children presenting a PTS and a normal GCS following head trauma frequently have TBIs, although many do not require emergent neurosurgery. Clinicians should strongly consider either neuroimaging or prolonged observation for these children.


Dr Lorenzo ZANETTO (Padova, Italy), Liviana DA DALT, Marco DAVERIO, Joel DUNNING, Anna Chiara FRIGO, Lise NIGROVIC, Silvia BRESSAN
10:40 - 12:10 #15915 - Y03 Is prehospital blood transfusion safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Y03 Is prehospital blood transfusion safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background
Life threatening hemorrhage accounts for 40% of mortality in trauma patients worldwide. Trauma is therefore the leading cause of death in patients aged 1-44 and in both civilian and military setting the most common cause of preventable death. After bleeding control is achieved, volume loss has to be restored. The positive effect of early in hospital transfusion of blood or blood components in equal proportions (1:1:1) is already proven but the scientific proof for the efficacy in the prehospital setting is still absent as a result of lack of randomized control trials.

Objective
Prove that prehospital transfusion of blood products is safe and effective on patients with extensive blood loss

Methods
Four databases have been searched: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and Pubmed in the period 1988 till March 2018.  After manually removing duplicates 2573 articles were screened on title and abstract by at least 2 reviewers. Articles were excluded when complied with the following exclusion criteria: no blood or blood products administered, animal study, no prehospital setting and no original data. 240 articles were subsequently screened on full text. Finally, a total of 48 articles have been included. Data was analyzed by meta-analysis for mortality.

Results
There was no significant difference in total mortality OR 1.09, 95% CI  [0.89, 1.33] or 24-hour mortality OR 0.93; 95% CI [0.64, 1.34]  for patients who received prehospital blood products, compared to standard care with crystalloids. A total of 4739 patients were transfused and 3 of them developed a complication which was possible the result of the transfusion (0.07%). Thirteen included studies advice the use of fluid warmers before transfusion.


Conclusion

The administration of blood products in the prehospital environment is safe, seems feasible but proof of efficacy is lacking.  Blood products have to be administered in equal proportions and heated before transfusion to minimize the risk to worsen hypothermia. Larger and randomized studies are required to demonstrate a statistically significant effect of the use of combined use of blood products.


Tim RIJNHOUT (Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

E42
LEADERSHIP
What can we learn from other environments?

LEADERSHIP
What can we learn from other environments?

Moderators: Malcolm GORDON (Consultant) (Glasgow, United Kingdom), Dr Barbara C HOGAN (Past President of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, EuSEM) (HAMBURG, Germany)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
10:40 - 12:10 Teamwork at the sharp end. Steven SHORT (Speaker, United Kingdom)
10:40 - 12:10 Translating lessons from military leadership? Graham PERCIVAL (Speaker, United Kingdom)
10:40 - 12:10 Running the ED. Dr Atriham ADAN (Medical Director, Emergency Department) (Speaker, Houston Texas - USA, USA)

10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

C42
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Building partnership through innovation

NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Building partnership through innovation

Moderator: Roma ARMSTRONG (United Kingdom)
Coordinator: Alasdair CORFIELD (Coordinator, Glasgow)
10:40 - 12:10 Innovation for Collaborative Design. David LOWE (Consultant) (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
10:40 - 12:10 Data Driven COPD management. Chris CARLIN (Consultant Physician) (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
10:40 - 12:10 iPed - using patients own technologies. Matthew REED (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Edinburgh)

10:40-12:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

F42
FREE PAPER 12
Pain Management / Analgesia / Anesthesia

FREE PAPER 12
Pain Management / Analgesia / Anesthesia

Moderators: Dr Pieter Jan VAN ASBROECK (Consultant in Emergency Medicine) (Genk, Belgium), James VASSALLO (EM Trainee) (Bristol)
10:40 - 12:10 #15114 - FP100 Is severe lymphopenia a predictive marker of Sepsis in the Emergency Department?
FP100 Is severe lymphopenia a predictive marker of Sepsis in the Emergency Department?

Background: Early and appropriate recognition of Sepsis is essential both to start the treatment and improve the prognosis in the Emergency department (ED). Traditional biomarkers such as Procalcitonin (PCT) and C Reactive Protein (CRP) are of limited value in Sepsis with a significant overcost in the ED when done systematically. Lymphopenia, known to be Sepsis-associated in the ICU, has not yet been evaluated neither used by clinicians as a Sepsis biomarker in the ED while white blood cell (WBC) count is routinely performed in almost every ED patient as part of admission. In addition, lymphocyte count is a cheap and simple biological criterion, easy to implement into daily practice.

Objective: We investigated whether isolated or clinically associated severe lymphopenia in ED could be a marker of Sepsis.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive single-center study over a 1-year period in a teaching hospital. Adult patients admitted in the ED with severe lymphopenia (defined by a lymphocyte count < 0.5 G/L) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with hematological or oncological diseases, HIV infection, hepato-cellular deficiency, immune depression and over 85 years old were excluded. Demographic data, reason for admission, qSOFA score, SIRS criteria, WBC, CRP and lactates were collected. Prevalence of Sepsis was evaluated by an independent adjudication committee based on clinical, biological and microbiological data available. Correlation between lymphopenia and Sepsis was assessed using a univariate analysis and multi-variable logistic regression.

Results: From January to December 2017, 953 patients were admitted in ED with severe lymphopenia and 245 were eligible (148 men; mean age 63±19 years). Sepsis was confirmed in 159 patients (65%) by the adjudication committee (bacterial: 60.4%, viral: 30.2%, other: 9.4%). Initially, only 61 patients (25%) were referred to ED for suspected infection. Of the infected patients, 18% had no diagnosis of infection after discharge from the ED. In “Sepsis group”, 116 patients (73%) met SIRS criteria and 46 patients (29%) had a qSOFA score ≥ 2 points at admission. There was a difference between both groups regarding CRP (Sepsis group: 109±133 vs No sepsis group: 46±62, p<0.0001) but not regarding the WBC count (Sepsis group: 10.8±5.5 vs No sepsis group: 10.9±5.9, p=0.82) and lactate measurements (Sepsis group: 2.3±1.6 vs No sepsis group: 2.5±1.7, p=0.38). In univariate analysis, WBC count (OR = 0.23; 95% CI [0.95 ; 1.04]; p=0.82) and CRP (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [1 ; 1.01]; p = 0.0003) did not appear as factors associated with sepsis unlike clinical criteria such as fever (OR = 10.95; 95% CI [5.39 ; 22.26]; p < 0.0001). In the multi-variable logistic model, SIRS criteria (OR = 3.45; 95% CI [1.41 ; 3.52]; p=0.0006) and fever (OR = 2.54; 95% CI [1.32 ; 8.66]; p=0.01) were identified as independent variables associated with Sepsis.

Conclusion: Prevalence of Sepsis is high in patients with severe lymphopenia regardless the reason of admission in ED and traditional biomarkers results. This easy measurable marker could be used routinely by emergency physicians to assist them in the early diagnosis of Sepsis.



n/a
Arthur BAISSE, Ana Catalina HERNANDEZ PADILLA, Thomas DAIX, Robin JEANNET, François DALMAY, Christine VALLEJO, Bruno FRANÇOIS, Philippe VIGNON, Thomas LAFON (Limoges)
10:40 - 12:10 #15260 - FP101 The kids are alright: Reporting the differences from a post-hoc analysis of the observational, multi centre, cross-sectional Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine study.
FP101 The kids are alright: Reporting the differences from a post-hoc analysis of the observational, multi centre, cross-sectional Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine study.

Background.

Pain is a frequent reason for Emergency Department (ED) attendance. The aim of the POEM (Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine) study was to provide insight into the management of acute pain in the ED. We present a post-hoc comparison of the pain management provided to children (under 18yr) and adults.

 

Methods

The POEM study was an observational cross-sectional multicentre study in eleven UK EDs during 2015-2016. Patients of any age with a confirmed diagnosis of an isolated long bone fracture or dislocation were included. The patients were identified from each Trust’s clinical information system. Pain scoring and analgesia provision were compared to the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) Best Practice Guidelines (2014).  The recruiting EDs were five major trauma centres (one adult only, two combined adult/paediatric, two paediatric only) and six trauma units (combined adult/paediatric). We present a post-hoc comparison of children vs adults after noting an apparent difference during planned analyses.

 

Statistical methods

All analyses were performed using the R Statistics program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and standard statistical methodology.

 

Results

3196 (38%) of the 8346 patients in the POEM study were under 18 years old. The statistically significant differences between adults and children included: children received analgesia more often than adults (66% vs 53%), were more likely to have a pain score documented on initial assessment (55% vs 47%), and were more likely to have that initial assessment within 20 minutes of arrival (63% vs 50%). The analgesia provided was more likely to be deemed appropriate to the pain score than it was in the adult population (67% vs 53%). Therefore compliance with the RCEM guidance was significantly more likely for children than adults.

Interestingly, children were less likely than adults to have a reassessment of their pain score documented (7% vs 11%) and furthermore, if they arrived by ambulance children were less likely than adults (14% vs 40%) to have received pre-hospital analgesia.

 

Discussion

Overall, children had better pain management before arrival and in the ED than adults. However there is still need for improvement in the management of pain for patients of all ages in the ED, in line with recommendations from previous national RCEM audits of painful conditions. Our data does not yet explain why there is an observed difference in the pain management of children vs adults. We plan to review our data further to understand these differences in more depth.

 

Conclusions

We have found that children with an isolated long bone fracture/dislocation receive better pain management in the ED than adults. Until factors influencing pain management are better understood, we recommend that all clinicians seek to improve pain management for patients of all ages.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was approved by the Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REC 14/SC/0167) and waiver of consent was approved. Approval was gained from the Confidential Advisory Group (CAG 3-02(c)/2014) for collection of postcodes (required to calculate the index of multiple deprivation).



The study was supported by a grant from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the study was adopted onto the NIHR portfolio
Sarah WILSON (Slough, United Kingdom), Liza KEATING, Sally BEER, Jane QUINLAN, James SHEEHAN, Jack DAINTY, Melanie DARWENT, Martyn EZRA
10:40 - 12:10 #15295 - FP102 Pain scores: a fifth vital sign or a missed vital sign? An observational multicentre study of pain management in emergency departments.
FP102 Pain scores: a fifth vital sign or a missed vital sign? An observational multicentre study of pain management in emergency departments.

Background

Pain as the 5th vital sign was a concept introduced by the American Pain Society in 1996 and subsequently adopted in the UK.  It encourages the routine use of pain scoring in the acute setting in addition to standard vital signs, and remains an essential component of any pain management plan, where underassessment of pain risks the undertreatment of pain.  We investigated pain scoring in emergency departments (EDs) across the UK, in light of the 2014 Best Practice Guidelines by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM).  These state that all patients should have their pain assessed within 20 minutes of arrival in ED, with a re-evaluation within 30 minutes of their first dose of analgesia.

Methods

The POEM (Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine) study was an observational cross-sectional  multicentre study in eleven UK EDs during 2015-2016. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of an isolated long bone fracture or dislocation were included. Pain scoring and analgesia provision were compared to the RCEM Best Practice Guidelines.  Here we discuss the adequacy of pain scoring for the patients studied.

Statistical methods

All analyses were performed using the R Statistics program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and standard statistical methodology.

Results

Data were collected from 8346 patients, with 50% (4160 patients) having a pain score recorded on arrival, and only 19% (768) of these then having a follow up pain score.  Thus only 9% of the total study population had both an initial and an early follow up pain score, despite RCEM guidance recommending both.  Interestingly, a higher proportion of patients received analgesia in ED (58%, n= 4845) than had pain scores documented.

Departments ranged from documenting admission pain scores in 7% of their patients to 99% (median 62%).  Repeat pain scores were even more rarely recorded with an inter-hospital range of 1-29% (median 11%).

We found that there is more chance of a pain score being recorded in younger patients; if the patient arrives by ambulance (rather than self-presentation); if the patient is seen by a consultant rather than an Emergency Nurse Practitioner; and if the patient is non-white or is from an area with a higher deprivation index.

Conclusions

Pain scoring is documented poorly in EDs, and the RCEM Best Practice Guidelines have not been fully adopted.   Patients should be asked about pain to guide appropriate analgesic management, and pain scores reassessed to determine its effectiveness.  The fact that more patients received analgesia than had a pain score documented may indicate that pain is being discussed but not recorded.  Routine pain scoring remains an important part of demonstrating suitable and effective pain relief for patients attending ED.

Ethical approval and informed consent

Approved by the Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REC 14/SC/0167), including waiver of consent; and by the Confidential Advisory Group (CAG 3-02(c)/2014) for collection of postcodes to calculate the index of multiple deprivation.



The study was supported by a grant from the RCEM and the study was adopted onto the NIHR portfolio.
Jane QUINLAN, Sarah WILSON, James SHEEHAN, Sally BEER, Jack DAINTY, Melanie DARWENT, Martyn EZRA, Liza KEATING (Reading, United Kingdom)
10:40 - 12:10 #15587 - FP103 ED crowding hurts: results of a multicentre cross sectional observational pain study.
FP103 ED crowding hurts: results of a multicentre cross sectional observational pain study.

Background

It is estimated that 7 out of 10 attendances to the Emergency Department (ED) are related to pain and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) national audits of painful conditions conclude that  wide variation in performance exists between EDs across the United Kingdom (UK).  The RCEM has published standards for adequate acute pain management and acknowledged that the current management of acute pain in UK EDs is inadequate and the evidence base is poor.  Good pain management has been shown to correlate with patient satisfaction and departmental factors, including ED crowding have also been associated with standards of pain management.  The POEM (Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine) study aimed to identify factors associated with management of acute pain in the ED.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out in eleven UK EDs during 2015-2016. All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of an isolated long bone fracture or dislocation were included from a convenience sample.  Pain scoring and analgesia provision was compared to the RCEM Best Practice Guidelines and those who received adequate pain management were examined against those patients who did not receive adequate pain management looking at factors including: 4-hour target; time to assessment; re-attendance rate; total number of admissions from ED; staff:patient ratio; numbers of patients who left before being seen.

Logistic regression of the outcome variable was used to assess whether any of the explanatory variables were associated with individual and combined aspects of adequate pain management as per RCEM guidance.  All analyses were performed using the R Statistics program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and standard statistical methodology.

Results

Data was collected from 8346 patients with a fracture or dislocation.  1346 patients received adequate pain management as per RCEM Best Practice Guidance and 2740 patients did not.  Considering the combination of timely assessment and provision of analgesia, improved 4-hour performance is associated with improved delivery of adequate pain management (OR = 1.027 (95% CI p < 0.001)).

Improved staff to patient ratios was significantly associated with the documentation of a pain score (OR = 1.095 (95% CI, p < 0.001)).  It would appear that departmental crowding (4-hour performance) does not alter the recording of pain scores.

Discussion

EDs are crowded when there is poor performance against the 4hr target.  At these times patients are less likely to be assessed within 20 minutes, and less likely to be given analgesia.  Our results indicate that as an ED becomes more crowded with reduced 4-hour performance and reduced staff to patient ratios, the probability of achieving the recommended pain management standards for patients reduces.  This is in keeping with our clinical experience of crowded departments. 

Conclusions

These findings contribute to the growing evidence base of the detrimental effects of ED crowding on patient care and further work is required in this important area.

 

Ethical approval and informed consent

Approved by the Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REC 14/SC/0167), including waiver of consent; and by the Confidential Advisory Group (CAG 3-02(c)/2014) for collection of postcodes.



Trial Registration and Funding The study was supported by a grant from the RCEM and adopted onto the NIHR portfolio.
James SHEEHAN (Reading, United Kingdom), Liza KEATING, Sarah WILSON, Jane QUINLAN, Sally BEER, Jack DAINTY, Melanie DARWENT, Martyn EZRA
10:40 - 12:10 #15983 - FP104 Adequate analgesia in emergency department patients with fractured neck of femur – why are we not doing better? Reporting a post-hoc analysis of the observational, multicentre, cross-sectional 'prescription of analgesia in emergency medicine' study.
FP104 Adequate analgesia in emergency department patients with fractured neck of femur – why are we not doing better? Reporting a post-hoc analysis of the observational, multicentre, cross-sectional 'prescription of analgesia in emergency medicine' study.

Background

There is evidence to show that effective, early analgesia in patients with a fractured neck of femur (fNOF) improves final outcome. There has been debate as to the best form of analgesia, especially in the elderly, but fewer published studies as to why some fNOF patients are not given any analgesia. This analysis looks at staffing characteristics of the Emergency Department (ED) and demographic factors of patients with an isolated fractured NOF and their impact on measurement of pain scores and provision of analgesia.

Methods

The POEM (Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine) study was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study in eleven UK EDs during 2015-2016 of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of an isolated long bone fracture or dislocation. This is a post-hoc analysis of a subgroup of these patients who had a diagnosis of fNOF.  Logistic regression was used to examine patient and staffing factors which may impact on pain management. Patient factors included age, gender, ethnicity (white or non-white) and socio-economic status based on the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) whereby a higher score suggests greater deprivation. Departmental factors included time of the day and day of the week that the patient arrived in ED, arrival by ambulance, and crowding measures (ED staff:patient ratio and performance against the 4 hour target).

Statistical methods

All analyses were performed using the R Statistics program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and standard statistical methodology, including logistic regression of those variables described above.

Results

A total of 861 of the 8146 patients in the POEM study had a diagnosis of fNOF, of whom the majority were female (72%) and the average age was 85 years (range 19-104). For patients with a fNOF when 4-hour performance was better, initial assessment of pain was more likely to be within 20 minutes (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.057, p<0.001). In addition, there was better documentation of pain scores with increasing staff:patient ratios (OR 1.052 p=0.0152). A higher IMD score (more socially deprived) was associated with better documentation of pain scores (odds ratio 1.041, p<0.001), but a lower likelihood of receiving analgesia (odds ratio 0.982, p=0.006). Non-white patients were more likely than white patients to receive any analgesia (OR 4.127, p=0.027)

As social deprivation (IMD) increases, there is less chance of a satisfactory outcome for overall pain management in ED, based upon RCEM guidance for a timely pain score (within 20 minutes) and provision of appropriate analgesia (OR 0.973, p<0.05)).

 

Conclusions

Both patient and staffing factors influenced provision of timely analgesia to patients with a fNOF. In particular, higher index of multiple deprivation had a negative impact on the provision of adequate analgesia. For patients with a fNOF, crowding was associated with better documentation of pain scores but increased likelihood of delay in initial assessment.  

 

Ethical approval and informed consent

Approved by the Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REC 14/SC/0167), including waiver of consent; and by the Confidential Advisory Group (CAG 3-02(c)/2014) for collection of postcodes to calculate the index of multiple deprivation.



Trial Registration and Funding The study was supported by a grant from the RCEM and was adopted onto the NIHR portfolio.
Melanie DARWENT (Oxford, United Kingdom), Jane QUINLAN, Sarah WILSON, Liza KEATING, James SHEEHAN, Sally BEER, Jack DAINTY, Martyn EZRA
10:40 - 12:10 #14728 - FP105 Major incident triage and the evaluation of the Triage Sort as a secondary triage method.
FP105 Major incident triage and the evaluation of the Triage Sort as a secondary triage method.

Introduction

A key principle in the effective management of major incidents is triage, the process of prioritising patients on the basis of their clinical acuity.  Within both civilian and military practice in the UK, a two-stage approach to triage is employed, with primary triage at scene followed by a secondary triage process, allowing for a more detailed assessment of the patient using the Triage Sort.  Recent studies have demonstrated that existing methods of primary triage do not effectively identify patients in need of life-saving intervention (LSI), with high rates of under-triage, associated with increased mortality.  In order to improve the performance of the primary triage process, the MPTT-24 was developed, and this outperforms previous methods demonstrating lower rates of under-triage. 

To date, no studies have analysed the performance of the Triage Sort in the civilian setting.  The primary aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Triage Sort with the MPTT-24 and the NARU/Military Sieve at identifying patients in need of life-saving intervention.  

Methods

Retrospective database review of the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database for all adult patients (>18 years) between 2006-2014.  Patients were defined as Priority One if they received one or more LSIs from a previously defined list.  Patients were categorised using the Triage Sort, NARU/Military Sieve and the MPTT-24 using first recorded hospital physiology; only those with complete data were included.  Performance characteristics were evaluated using sensitivity and specificity and statistical analysis with a McNemar’s test.

Results

During the study period, 218,985 adult patients were included in the TARN database. 127,233 (58.1%) had complete data and were included: 55.6% male aged 61.4 (IQR 43.1-80.0 years), Injury Severity Score 9 (IQR 9-16), with 24,791 (19.5%) Priority One. The Triage Sort demonstrated the lowest performance of all triage tools at identifying need for LSI (sensitivity 15.7% (95%CIs 15.2-16.2) correlating with the highest rate of under-triage (84.3% (95%CIs 83.8-84.8), but had the greatest specificity (98.7% (95%CIs 98.6-98.8).

By comparison the NARU sieve had higher sensitivity (29.5% (95%CIs 28.9-30.1), but was outperformed by the MPTT-24 which demonstrated a statistically significant increase in performance (p<0.0001) with the greatest sensitivity (53.5% (95%CIs 52.9-54.1) and the lowest rate of under-triage (46.5% (95%CIs 45.9-47.1%). However, this increase in sensitivity comes at the expense of specificity, with the MPTT-24 having the lowest specificity (74.8% (95%CIs 74.6-75.1).

Conclusion

Within a civilian trauma registry population, the Triage Sort demonstrates the poorest performance at identifying patients in need of LSI.  Its use as a secondary triage tool should be reviewed, with an urgent need for further research to determine the optimum method of secondary triage.  

 


James VASSALLO (Bristol, ), Jason SMITH
10:40 - 12:10 #14745 - FP106 Observational study for establishment of a predictive score for acute coronary syndrome during regulation of a call to the pre-hospital Emergency Medical Service center for chest pain: SCARE score.
FP106 Observational study for establishment of a predictive score for acute coronary syndrome during regulation of a call to the pre-hospital Emergency Medical Service center for chest pain: SCARE score.

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death in France, and among these, the acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the most common. To improve morbidity and mortality, the current challenge is to propose an adapted therapeutic (pre-hospital and / or in-hospital) as soon as possible. It is therefore essential to identify any ACS as early as medical regulation is in place. There is currently no ACS predictive score available for use in pre-hospital Emergency Medical Service (EMS) call center. The goal is to establish such a score and check its accuracy.

Material and method: Our prospective, observational and monocentric study was conducted from 1st January to 31th December 2016 at a French pre-hospital EMS call center, including any call for chest pain. Our population was randomized into two subgroups. In the derivation sample (two thirds), the univariate and multivariate analyses identified independent factors associated with ACS in regulation, and allowed the creation of a predictive score, based for each significant variable, on the beta coefficients of multivariate regression. In the validation sample (one-third), the discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and the calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results: Of the 1367 included patients, 183 (13.4%) were diagnosed with ACS. The 7 variables significantly associated with the diagnosis of ACS in regulation are: male sex (OR 2.7, p < 0.001), age (OR 3.8 for the 43 – 57 year old and OR 4.5 for the > 57 year old, p = 0.0024), smoking (OR 2.2, p = 0.0023), typicality of the pain (OR 1.9, p = 0.0183), inaugural character of the pain (OR 1.7, p = 0.0238), presence of sweats (OR 1.9, p= 0.0057) and conviction of the physician (OR 2.9, p < 0.001). The AUC of this multivariate regression model is 0.81 and the Hosmer-Lemeshow "p" is 0.74 in the validation sample.

Conclusion: We were able to establish an ACS predictive score, usable for regulation of chest pain, the SCARE score, which has good discrimination and an excellent calibration in internal validation. This score allows stratifying risk of ACS, using epidemiological elements but also using the belief of the physician, whose Negative Predictive Value is excellent.



Ethical approval number : CE n° 2016-05 Agreement CNIL by CIL of the CHR Orleans
Audrey GUERINEAU (Orléans), Charlotte GUERIN, Clément ROZELLE, Annabelle POLETTE, Elodie SEVESTRE, Nesrine NABLI, Olivier GIOVANNETTI
10:40 - 12:10 #14938 - FP107 Paramedic views of ethical considerations in ambulance based clinical trials: an interview study.
FP107 Paramedic views of ethical considerations in ambulance based clinical trials: an interview study.

Background:

Ambulance services provide an increasing number of Emergency Medical Service health contacts, assessing people, treating at home or conveying them to further care. Prehospital research, needed to inform evidence based ambulance care, has unique ethical considerations due to urgency, time-limitations and the locations (home, ambulance) involved (Armstrong et al, 2017). Despite clinical research based in the ambulance setting increasing, there has been limited work assessing the impact of ethical considerations on this research. We sought to explore the ethical considerations perceived by paramedics involved with research in the prehospital ambulance setting.

Methods:

We employed a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with paramedics who had enrolled at least one participant into a clinical trial in one large (around 750 thousand patient contacts per year) English regional ambulance service. Principlism, focussing on autonomy, beneficence and maleficence was used as a theoretical framework. Participants were asked a series of questions regarding their experiences in ambulance trials, their opinions on the impact of trials on both their own practice and on patients, and their views on ethical considerations of research more generally. The interview transcripts were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded by two researchers (SA and VHP) and analysed thematically using framework analysis.

Results:

15 interviews were completed (11 male, 4 female paramedics) during 2017 and 2018 over a period of 8 months. Participants had a range of experience as paramedic from 1 to 28 years’ service, with similar numbers trained either through a higher education route (n=8) or a more traditional ‘on the job’ training route (n=9). Initial analysis highlighted 4 main themes:

Consent

  • Paramedics were comfortable with gaining consent and felt that it helped calm people during the incident.

Benefits and barriers

  • Paramedics felt that research was important, helping to support improvements in patient care.
  • Most felt that time was the biggest barrier to research with staff attitudes also being important.

Trial specific training

  • All felt that the trial specific training helped although some mentioned that being able to see trial materials, including documentation, before attending the first patient would have been beneficial.

Reasons for participating (or not)

  • The most often cited reason for participating in research was to improve evidence based practice for the good of the patient. Reasons for not participating included fears about lost skills when allocated to a non-intervention group or where there was no clear patient benefit.

Conclusion

Overall, paramedics interviewed were positive about taking part in research and were confident gaining consent. The main barriers to participation were time pressures and staff attitudes towards research. Most felt that clinical trials should continue within this field as they contributed to evidence based practice, vital for the development of ambulance services and for the benefit of patients. Paramedics that chose not to be involved in research were excluded, but for future studies it may be useful to include this group to understand why they choose to not participate.



Funded by the Wellcome Trust Seed Award grant ref: 110488/Z/15/Z.
Stephanie ARMSTRONG (Lincoln, United Kingdom), Viet-Hai PHUNG, Adele LANGLOIS, A Niroshan SIRIWARDENA
10:40 - 12:10 #15871 - FP108 Thinking on scene: Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decision making.
FP108 Thinking on scene: Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decision making.

Introduction

Paramedics make important decisions as to whether a patient requires transport to hospital, or can be discharged at scene.  Taking patients to the Emergency Department (ED) who do not require ED care or services is known as over-conveyance. Research shows that nearly 20% of patients brought to ED by ambulance, could be treated elsewhere.  In contrast, under-conveyance occurs when paramedics discharge a patient on-scene who required ED or hospital care. In 2016/17 in England, 5.2% of discharged patients re-contacted the ambulance service within 24 hours.  This study aims to investigate the accuracy of conveyance decisions made by on-scene paramedics. 

Methods

Six individual patient vignettes were created using linked ambulance, ED and GP data and used in an online survey to paramedics in Yorkshire.  Half the vignettes related to clinically necessary attendances at the ED and the other half were clinically unnecessary.  Vignettes were validated by a small expert panel.  Participants were asked to determine the appropriate conveyance decision and to explain the rationale behind their decisions using a free text box.They were also asked to predict hospital admission.

Results

143 paramedics undertook the survey and 858 vignettes were completed.  There was clear agreement between paramedics for transport decisions (kappa=0.63) and for admission prediction (kappa=0.86).  Overall accuracy was 0.69 (95% CI 0.66-0.73).  Paramedics were better at ‘ruling in’ the ED with sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92).  The specificity of ‘ruling out’ the ED was 0.51 (95% CI 0.46-0.56).  Text comments were focussed on patient safety and risk aversion.

Discussion

 Paramedics make accurate conveyance decisions but are more likely to over-convey than under-convey, meaning that whilst decisions are safe they are not always appropriate.  Some risk-averse decisions were made due to patient and professional safety reasons. It is important that paramedics feel supported by the service to make non-conveyance decisions. Reducing over-conveyance is a potential method of reducing ED demand.


Jamie MILES (Sheffield, ), Joanne COSTER, Richard JACQUES

12:10
12:10-12:40
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A43
HOT TOPIC LECTURE

HOT TOPIC LECTURE
Hot Topic inside!

Moderator: Kurt ANSEEUW (Medical doctor) (Antwerp, Belgium)
12:10 - 12:40 Threat by nerve agents: up-date of diagnostic and therapeutc strategies! Horst THIERMANN (Speaker, München, Germany)

12:40
12:40-13:10
Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites

A44
Closing Ceremony

Closing Ceremony

Moderator: Patrick PLAISANCE (Head of Department) (Paris, France)
12:40 - 13:10 Best Research Abstract award. Youri YORDANOV (Médecin) (Speaker, Paris, France)
12:40 - 13:10 Young researcher award. Martin FANDLER (Consultant) (Speaker, Bamberg, Germany, Germany)
12:40 - 13:10 Audience Award. Pr Rick BODY (Professor of Emergency Medicine) (Speaker, Manchester)
12:40 - 13:10 EuroSimCup Award. Guillem BOUILLEAU (Urgentiste - Formateur en Santé) (Speaker, Blois, France)
12:40 - 13:10 Closing Address: EUSEM ECOC President. Patrick PLAISANCE (Head of Department) (Speaker, Paris, France)
12:40 - 13:10 Best-of video of Glasgow 2018 meeting.
12:40 - 13:10 SCOC and ECOC member.
12:40 - 13:10 Closing Address: EUSEM President. Roberta PETRINO (Head of department) (Speaker, Italie, Italy), Luis GARCIA-CASTRILLO (ED director) (Speaker, ORUNA, Spain)
12:40 - 13:10 From Glasgow to Praga. Dr Jana SEBLOVA (Emergency Physician) (Speaker, PRAGUE, Czech Republic), Jason LONG (Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
12:40 - 13:10 The Final picture with all attendees, and other surprises!