Friday 06 September
00:00

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EXAMS
00:00 - 00:00

EDPM EXAMINER

Examiners: Akm AKHTARUZZAMAN (akm.akhtaruzzaman@bsmmu.edu.bd) (Examiner, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Bangladesh), Isabel BRAZAO (Consultant) (Examiner, Madrid, Spain), Eric BUCHSER (Senior Consultant) (Examiner, Morges, Switzerland), Gaurav CHHABRA (Consultant) (Examiner, Bristol, United Kingdom), Duarte CORREIA (Head of Centro Multidisciplinar de Medicina da Dor - Dr. Rui Silva) (Examiner, DUARTE CORREIA, Portugal), Jose DE ANDRES (Tenured Professor) (Examiner, Valencia (Spain), Spain), Pasquale DE NEGRI (Director of Dept) (Examiner, Caserta, Italy), Gustavo FABREGAT (Anesthesiologist) (Examiner, Valencia, Spain), Ashish GULVE (Consultant in Pain Medicine) (Examiner, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom), Kok-Yuen HO (Consultant) (Examiner, Singapore, Singapore), Senthil JAYASEELAN (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management) (Examiner, UK, United Kingdom), Anu KANSAL (Faculty) (Examiner, Middlesbrough, UK, United Kingdom), Andrzej KROL (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine) (Examiner, LONDON, United Kingdom), Sarah LOVE-JONES (Anaesthesiology) (Examiner, Bristol, United Kingdom), Sandeep MIGLANI (Consultant) (Examiner, Dublin, Ireland), Maurizio MARCHESINI (Pain medicine Consultant) (Examiner, NAPOLI, Italy), Samridhi NANDA (ESRA Congress) (Examiner, Jaipur, India), Christophe PERRUCHOUD (Medical chief officer) (Examiner, Geneva, Switzerland), Martina REKATSINA (Assistant Professor of Anaesthesiology) (Examiner, Athens, Greece), Athmaja THOTTUNGAL (yes) (Examiner, Canterbury, United Kingdom), Reda TOLBA (Department Chair and Professor) (Examiner, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Efrossini (Gina) VOTTA-VELIS (speaker) (Examiner, Chicago, USA), Vaishali WANKHEDE (consultant) (Examiner, Switzerland, Switzerland)
08:00

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B30
08:00 - 09:50

SPECIAL SESSION
RA History: What have we learned in the last 5 decades?

Chairpersons: Eleni MOKA (faculty) (Chairperson, Thessaloniki, Greece, Greece), Brian SITES (Faculty) (Chairperson, Plainfield, USA)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Eleni MOKA (faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Thessaloniki, Greece, Greece), Brian SITES (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Plainfield, USA)
08:05 - 08:23 #43486 - B30 ESRA History: Important Milestones.
ESRA History: Important Milestones.

ESRA History: Important Milestones

Athina Vadalouca,1 Eleni Moka,2

1.     Pain & Palliative Care Centre, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece

2.     Anaesthesiology Department, Creta Interclinic Hospital, Hellenic Healthcare Group (HHG), Heraklion – Crete, Greece  

To effectively unfold a history, one needs to:

  1. know those inspired people, that paved the pathway and «wrote» the history,
  2. comprehend their backgrounds and motivations,
  3. delve into and understand their scientific or/and intellectual journeys,
  4. be one of them to identify and trace the history, or develop a deep connection with the history pioneers, aligning with their objectives and sharing their goals and vision, to authentically convey their perspectives.

 

Since these criteria are met, the up to now history of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA) will be elaborated upon the lecture of Athina Vadalouca, during the 41st ESRA Annual Congress, held in Prague in September 2024, and will further be summarized in the following pages. 

 

ESRA was founded 44 years ago. Honouring its history and cherishing its heritage, nowadays, the society represents a dynamic organization that continues to share the passion for advancing education, scientific research and training in Regional Anaesthesia (RA), Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine. While its origins are rooted in Europe, ESRA has evolved into a global network, currently embracing more than 8.000 active voting members and an audience of more than 30.000 trainees, specialists, and nurses across the globe. As an international community, with a reputation for innovation, diversity and inclusion, its mission transcends geographical boundaries, offering invaluable opportunities to medical professionals worldwide, with the promise to support them during the transform of their professional journey.

 

ESRA was founded by individuals, who shared the same mission, vision and talent to create the society. The idea originated from the first officers of ASRA Pain Medicine and from some brilliant minds who were well acquainted with many people in Europe, both professionally and personally. For instance, Ben Covino worked with Bruce Scott, the first President of ESRA, in Edinburg in 1976, and encouraged him to start establishing a European Society of Regional Anaesthesia.

 

ESRA was officially founded by a Belgian Royal Decree on January 31, 1980, following intensive efforts and a pivotal meeting in Heidelberg, on September 24-25, 1979. The organization's «Founding Fathers» were Albert Van Steenberge (Belgium), Hans Nolte (Germany), Arno Hollmén (Finland), Bruce Scott (UK), and Françoise Van Steenberge (Albert’s wife), who served as the group’s secretary. They established an administrative and scientific structure, accommodating Europe’s diverse countries, languages, and currencies. 

 

Under Bruce Scott’s leadership, two committees were created from the very first beginning: one to establish and set up the society across Europe and another to plan the first scientific meeting. This inaugural meeting was held in Edinburgh on September 16–18, 1982. ASRA Pain Medicine provided funding, and several UK companies (Astra Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Duncan Flockhart & Co Ltd, Dupont UK Ltd, and Roche Products Ltd) offered substantial sponsorship. The Edinburgh meeting marked the emergence of ESRA as a separate and distinct entity. The meeting lasted two days, with its scientific activities taking place in only one plenary hall, hosting one session at a time. 

 

Over the years, the ESRA scientific meetings grew and flourished, now expanding to four days and featuring multiple concurrent sessions, such as networking symposia, plenary experts’ panel discussions, instructional refresher course lectures, PRO–CON debates, «ask the expert» interactive sessions, «second opinion» discussions, «tips & tricks» sessions, problem based learning discussions (PBLD), free papers and video contests, electronic poster presentations with a poster competition, various hands–on clinical workshops on Ultrasound Guided Regional Anaesthesia (UGRA) and Pain Management, cadaver workshops, and exams for the acquisition of the ESRA Diplomas (ESRA–DRA and ESRA–DPM). Many other innovative sessions are introduced on an annual basis, including complex case discussions with audience–submitted content, trainees sessions, LIVE demonstrations on models and the 360 open space simulation courses. The annual congresses are pre–planned well in advance and take place in major European cities, each with unique social programs.

 

ESRA's first President was Bruce Scott, Albert Van Steenberge held the position of General Secretary, and Otto Schulte–Steinberg took charge of the finances as Treasurer. The initial zones created in 1980 were Benelux, France, Germany, Italy, Scandinavia, Spain, and the UK. Greece became a member in 1988, followed by Austria, Switzerland, and Portugal in 1990. The aim of ESRA was to attract all European countries, by offering educational, training and research opportunities, adhering to a philosophy of inclusivity and knowledge advancement beyond barriers.

 

ESRA actively supported the establishment of national or regional groups or organisations of RA throughout Europe, inviting and encouraging them to join the society under its rules and regulations. ESRA Ambassadors such as Albert Van Steenberge (Belgium), Slobodan Gligorijevic (Switzerland), Marc Van De Velde (Belgium) and Patrick Narchi (France) have supported and represented Eastern European countries throughout these efforts.

ESRA continuously updated its administrative structures with the primary goal of enhancing the dissemination of knowledge in RA and, more recently in Pain Management. We can trace the ESRA history step by step, throughout its significant milestones, that are presented below.

 

·       In 1984, during the Vienna meeting, ESRA established the Carl Koller Award, recognizing Dr John Alfred Lee (UK) as its first recipient. This award, originally sponsored by ASTRA, continues until today to honour, recognize and acknowledge scientific achievements and an outstanding lifetime contribution in the field of RA and/or Pain Medicine.

·       In 1989, ESRA launched its official publication, «The International Monitor of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (IMRAPT)», with Mathieu Gielen (The Netherlands) serving as Editor–in–Chief. IMRAPT was initially supported by ASTRA, and later on by ASTRA/ZENECA, with its issues being published on a quarterly basis. Narinder Rawal (Sweden) succeeded Mathieu Gielen, and took over as Editor–in–Chief, holding the position from 1995 to 2005.

·       In 1992, André Van Zundert (Belgium) initiated the publication of the «Highlights» of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, serving as Editor–in–Chief until 1999. From 2000 to 2003, he co–edited this edition with Narinder Rawal (Sweden), who then continued as Co–Editor alongside with the society Presidents, Slobodan Gligorijevic (Switzerland) and Giorgio Ivani (Italy), until 2009. In 2010, José de Andres (Spain) and Marc Van De Velde (Belgium) took over as Editors–in–Chief. The Highlights continue to be released as an online RAPM supplement every September.

·       On October 27, 1993, the ESRA Foundation was established, with its statutes being published on December 16, 1993. The foundation's mission was to organize educational activities in RA and Pain Therapy for anaesthetists. Additionally, it was authorized and empowered to grant awards and prizes, to recognize excellence in the fields. 

·       In 1995, the ESRA lecture was introduced, being delivered by JAW Wildsmith (UK), and becoming a prominent feature of the Annual Congresses. 

·       The following year, in 1996, the ASRA lecture was added to the Annual Congress program, with the inaugural lecture being delivered by John Rowlingson (USA).

·       In order to showcase the diverse applications of RA, enhance the understanding and improve the knowledge in the field, as well as to attract new members to join the society, the ESRA Board of Directors planned an International Symposium on RA (ISRA). The inaugural ISRA congress took place in New Zealand from April 9–11, 1996, was supported by ESRA, ASRA, AOSRA, and LASRA, with JFW Wildsmith (UK) being at the helm of its scientific committee.

·       In 1998, during the Annual Congress in Geneva, from September 16–19, the ESRA Board of Directors approved and sanctioned the formation of several new committees. These were:

·a. Newsletter and Promotions Committee (Chair: A. Vadalouca, Greece)

b. Research Grant Committee (Chair: A. Vadalouca, Greece)

c. Education and Website Committee (Chair: B. Fischer, UK)

d. Best Presentation Committee (Chair: M. Gielen, The Netherlands)

e. Guidelines on Acute and Chronic Pain Committee (Chair: N. Rawal, Sweden)

 

Three prizes for the best free papers and three for the best posters, sponsored by Becton–Dickinson, were awarded for the first time at this meeting. This event also marked the ESRA and EuroPain inaugural joint meeting, followed by another one in Istanbul in 1999

 

Concurrently, the first ESRA Cadaver Workshop in Innsbruck also started that year, with Slobodan Gligorijevic (Switzerland) serving as the chair of this event. This was a significant educational initiative, which was further improved and fine–tuned over the years, remaining one of the most popular ESRA activities until today.

 

ESRA expanded its global presence and footprint by holding a fruitful international meeting in Jaipur, India, from February 9–13, 1998, with Narinder Rawal (Sweden) being the chair of the event. The society further engaged with and reached out to the Balkan countries, by organizing the 1st Mediterranean and Balkan Congress in Athens, Greece, from June 19-21, 1998, chaired by Athina Vadalouca (Greece), and attracting over 550 participants.

 

At the Rome ESRA Annual Congress, in 2000, ESRA awarded its first Research Grant, being split between Spanish and Greek recipients. That year, meetings were also held in Quebec and Athens.

 

In 2002, Barcelona hosted the 1st World Congress of Regional Anaesthesia, providing a global perspective on RA and Pain Therapy. 

 

The first Eastern European anatomy workshop on RA took place in Ljubljana also in 2002, whereas ESRA launched its first Winter Week course on RA in 2003. Both events were leaded by Slobodan Gligorijevic (Switzerland) and were welcome warmly by their audiences. The Eastern European Cadaver workshops keep being organized, with Paul Kessler (Germany) and Peter Merjavy (UK) serving as event chairs and following a venue rotation between Ljubljana, Prague, and Budapest. Additionally, Winter Week has evolved into an extremely successful activity over the years, being continued until today, under the leadership of Geert Jan Van Geffen (The Netherlands).

 

The BBraun Award was established in 2005 and was presented to Alain Delbos (France), for his outstanding contribution in UGRA, via the introduction of a 3–D simulation training tool in the format of a DVD. The award kept being sponsored by BBraun until 2010. Afterwards, it was renamed «Recognition of Education in Regional Anaesthesia» Award, and is offered annually to support outstanding innovative activities or developments in the field of RA, as a reflection of excellence in teaching & clinical education. Similarly, the «Recognition of Education in Pain Medicine» Award was introduced in 2023, with Philip Peng (Canada) being its first recipient. 

 

In 2005, the ESRA Diploma of Regional Anaesthesia (EDRA) was launched, a project driven and spearheaded by André Van Zundert (Belgium), Giorgio Ivani (Italy), Narinder Rawal (Sweden), and Alain Borgeat (Switzerland), with the valuable assistance and substantial contribution from Chandra Kumar (UK). The first EDRA Diploma exams took place, in 2006, during the ESRA Annual Congress in Monte Carlo, Monaco. There were only a few candidates at first (4 in total), but the number has increased considerably since then, with ESRA nowadays counting more than 1000 diplomates. Recently this popular diploma has been renamed to ESRA–DRA (ESRA European Diploma of Regional Anaesthesia).

 

Education and Excellence in the Provision of Care in Europe and beyond represent an integral part of the ESRA mission. The society is proud of the two jewels on its crown: Not only the ESRA–DRA, but also the ESRA–DPM (ESRA European Diploma of Pain Medicine), which was established in 2017, as an idea of Jose De Andres (Spain). Both aim to harmonize and improve quality standards for safe, independent practice in our fields, in Europe and elsewhere. The Diplomas assess the competencies of anaesthesiologists and pain physicians, acting within a multidisciplinary team and practicing as specialists. They also intend to complement national standards and enhance the competent, ethical, and professional care of RA and Pain Medicine. The ESRA Diplomas Exams, which are quite popular, are organized regularly on an annual basis, remotely and in person, within but also outside the European territory. Both of them, in 2023, during the 6th World Congress of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, have been evaluated and received official accreditation by the Council for European Medical Specialists Assessment (CESMA), an advisory body of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Pioneers in this endeavor were Morne Wolmarans (UK) and Sam Eldabe (UK), for the ESRA–DRA and ESRA–DPM respectively.

 

The ESRA Academy was founded in 2010, was presented at the annual congress in Porto, and was further reformed from scratches in the coming years, being re–launched and presented in 2015 by Paolo Grossi (Italy). The Academy continues to be a valuable tool for all ESRA members, by hosting a variety of online educational content, including but not limited to recorded lectures, videos, and live demonstrations of RA/Pain techniques. 

 

The updated ESRA bylaws were also presented in 2010, and were approved by the Annual General Assembly, in addition to the «Albert Van Steenberge» Award, which was also launched that year. ESRA kept growing its membership and impact in RA and Pain Therapy in 2013. That year, the first publication on ESRA history by André Van Zundert (Belgium) and JAW Wildsmith (UK) was released and published in the journal RAPM.

 

In 2014, PROSPECT (Procedure Specific Postoperative Pain Management) and ESRA formalized an agreement to strategize and plan their future partnership and to expand the group membership. PROSPECT, although an ESRA working group, still remains an independent academic body within the society academic umbrella. Currently, under the leadership of Marc Van De Velde (Belgium), continues to benefit from the academic endorsement and support of ESRA and develops some of the best available Consensus Recommendations in a clinically useful format. These are readily transferable in daily practice, serve as a clinical decision support service, and are designed to improve postoperative pain management on a procedure–specific basis. As such, they are translated into multiple languages to be readily available for clinicians across all corners of the world.

In 2014, the 4th World Congress on RA and Pain Therapy (WCRAPT) took place in Cape Town, South Africa, from November 24–28, being jointly organized by ESRA, ASRA, LASRA, and AFSRA.

In 2015, 2016 and onwards, under the leadership of Paul Kessler (Germany), ESRA significantly expanded its accredited workshops, featuring cadaver sessions and practical hands–on training across multiple European cities, mainly Innsbruck and Witten. The cadaver workshops have also expanded in the field of pain and under the guidance of Andrzej Krol (UK), ultrasound and C–Arm facilitated interventional chronic pain techniques are regularly demonstrated and taught. 

 

In the era of rapid E–Learning transformation, ESRA was a pioneer. It keeps staying in tune with the latest trends and technologies and has adapted the provision of its educational content to the new digitally driven world. Since 2017, it offers its audience access and navigation into the USabcd platform, a unique E–Learning concept, which provides the empowerment one needs with the knowledge of RA and Point–of–Care Ultrasound in clinical practice. Clinicians who utilize the USabcd tool may take advantage of its focused, structured and comprehensive format to improve their diagnosis capabilities and optimize patients’ care in the perioperative, ICU and emergency medicine setting.

 

At the end of the previous decade, ESRA introduced innovative online educational initiatives, and is proud of its interactive e–Congress (e–ESRA), which was first launched in 2018, by Alain Delbos (France) and Luc Mercadal (France). This internet–based activity, a unique educational concept, brought a new dimension of online education, for a maximum learning outcome. With an extended 24–hour program, broadcasted live all over the world in parallel streams, and the enthusiastic interaction of participants, via live chats, polls & quizzes with instant results, a virtual experience of a full congress, dedicated to RA, Perioperative Care & Pain Medicine, has been accomplished. Its 6th edition took place in April 2024, under the leadership of Jose Aguirre (Switzerland), with the active involvement of not only ESRA, but also ASRA Pain Medicine, LASRA, AFSRA and AOSRA–PM. It attracted more than 1.200 delegates connected online in one single day, across all continents. Interesting lectures of short duration, podcasts, videos, and Live Demonstration Sessions were presented, and are available for replay, via the ESRA Academy. The e–ESRA represents a hub for elevating education standards and for promoting international collaboration and networking. It opens the doors to knowledge for physicians from Europe and beyond, in a flexible and affordable way, and fosters a diverse and enriching exchange of ideas, transcending any geographical boundaries.

 

In 2018 and 2019, ESRA was phenomenal in expanding its social media presence and outreach, attracting thousands of followers on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter. 

 

Traditionally, ESRA participated in the development of comprehensive Guidelines or Recommendations on RA and PM practices, in close collaboration with other organizations. The latest ones include, but are not limited to (a) the Joint Guidelines with the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) on how to manage patients on antithrombotic drugs who need RA, published in European Journal of Anaesthesiology in 2022, (b) the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) Recommendations on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 2022, (c) the International Consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in UGRA, published in RAPM in 2022, and (d) the Evidence–Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache, as a Consensus Report from a Multisociety International Working Group, published in RAPM and JAMA Open in 2024.

 

ESRA prioritized education for anaesthetists in training and young specialists across Europe and devotes much of its efforts to the residents, the lifeblood of our profession and the promising future of medical care. Their enthusiasm, fresh perspectives, and unwavering commitment to patient well–being pave the way for innovation and excellence in our fields. Alongside experts’ guidance, ESRA fully supports the ESRA Trainees Group that was created in 2016, and their annual course, whereas a part of the ESRA website educational content is fully dedicated to them. 

 

Research and Education grants of up to 10.000 and 4.000 EUR each respectively are awarded regularly to young researchers worldwide, who are strongly encouraged to apply. Approved Training Centres of Excellence on RA or/and Pain Medicine in Europe are available to the new generation of physicians, with specific emphasis given to applications from anaesthesiologists from countries lacking the financial infrastructures needed to achieve education in RA and Pain Medicine. The ESRA Updates, the new format of the ESRA Newsletter, initiated by Clara Lobo (Portugal), serves the society by offering content that is not only informative but also engaging for the members. Its main goal and objectives are to spread information on ESRA events and training opportunities and disseminate the spirit of enthusiasm among our younger colleagues. Since May 2016, ESRA, also started offering a Master Diploma (MSc) to its members in partnership with the University of East Anglia.

 

In 2020 and 2021, ESRA responded to the COVID–19 pandemic by moving many educational events to online formats. Innovative web–based training activities, including free webinars, virtual or hybrid meetings and the well–established e-Congresses (e-ESRA) maintained the society at the knowledge forefront, and finally became tradition. Currently, these tools continue to thrive on an annual basis, showcasing the ESRA dedication to improving RA and Pain Medicine through education, research, and international cooperation.

In 2022, ESRA marked its 40th anniversary since the organization of its first meeting, looking back on its development and achievements in the field. The first annual congress after the pandemic took place in Thessaloniki, Greece, with over 1.750 attendees and more than 500 abstracts, under the leadership of Alain Delbos (France) and Eleni Moka (Greece). The event was both scientifically and socially rewarding.

In 2023, ESRA hosted its biggest scientific event ever, the 6th World Congress of RA and PM, in Paris, as a joint event with its 40th Annual Congress. Joining collaborative efforts with all sister societies (ASRA Pain Medicine, AFSRA, LASRA, AFSRA and AORAPM), the impressive numbers of more than 3.300 Delegates, more than 300 Faculty Members & Key Opinion Leaders from all continents, and more than 750 abstracts were achieved. Alain Delbos (France) and Eleni Moka (Greece) led the scientific committee and supervised the whole organization. An expanded, high–quality scientific content was offered to all participants, in parallel with a great family atmosphere, combined with networking, interactivity, knowledge sharing and exchange of new ideas. This congress was not just another ESRA event; it showcased that, in the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, deepening partnerships is the cornerstone, upon which we can build bridges, learn from each other, support fundamental changes and establish progress.

 

ESRA embraces diversity within its community and offers unparalleled networking opportunities and friendships that span the globe. Collective efforts with partners that share similar values and principles are more than welcome, as they enhance the richness of discussions and perspectives, providing a global outlook on our fields. A great example inside ESRA is its International Committee, established in 2021, to give a sound voice to physicians from all continents involved in RA and Pain Medicine. 

 

The unique experiences and insights of all ESRA followers are not just valued but celebrated! In the past, the highlighting event of such celebration was the European Day of RA, that was first organized in 2018, as an initiative of Alain Delbos (France) and Sebastien Bloc (France) and which continued to take place at the beginning of each year in January, until 2023. Together with the National Societies of RA and Pain Therapy, multiple cities in different European countries every year participated simultaneously, with a common scientific program, aiming at interactivity and exchange of scientific opinions between trainees and experts on hot topics related to RA and Perioperative Care. The primary goal was discussing innovations and combining theory with clinical methodology and Hands–On Practice. With this event, ESRA kept promoting signaling the encouragement of training, education and research in the context of improved quality of continuing medical education among European Anaesthesiologists. 

 

Following the footsteps of such meetings, and in the same spirit of enthusiasm, ESRA aspired to expand this activity worldwide to contribute to its mission fulfilment. Under the presidency of Eleni Moka (Greece), ESRA, together with its Sister Societies AFSRA, ASRA Pain Medicine, AOSRA and LASRA, launched the 1st World Week and the 1st World Day of RA and Pain Medicine in January 2024, drawing more than 14.000 participants from more than 140 cities across all continents. During this week, in the concept of a strengthened alliance, RA and Chronic Pain physicians around the globe were connected together, to shine a spotlight on the critical fields of RA and Pain Medicine, under the inspiring theme “Joining Hands for a Pain Free Future Worldwide”. Recognizing that progress transcends individual achievements, leaders of all RA and PM Sister Societies acknowledged the power of unity, identified shared visions and missions, and recognized the potential for our patients’ benefit.

 

All ESRA milestones that have been described, allow us to reflect on the progress that has been made and the work that lies ahead. Throughout its remarkable journey, ESRA expanded its horizons and pushed the boundaries to become an international community for everyone who aspires to high standards and professionalism in RA, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine. Despite challenges, ESRA is a testament to the power of inclusivity and collaboration in our ever–evolving fields of interest. A vibrant tapestry of ideas and shared values were and continue to be created by joining efforts. As we embark on this journey together, let us remember that in unity, we may find strength, and in inclusion, we can discover the boundless potential for growth and innovation. When combined, our individual strengths have the power to collectively achieve remarkable advancements in the pursuit of knowledge, scientific research and patient care. ESRA continues to extend the hand of partnership to everyone that shares its vision, ensuring a brighter future to reach global excellence.

 

References

1.     André AJ Van Zundert, John AW Wildsmith. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (1982–2012): 30 Years Strong. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2013; 38(5): 436 – 441. (The following individuals contributed to this article on behalf of the Heritage Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy: Alain Borgeat, MD, PhD, EDRA; José De Andres, MD, PhD, EDRA; Slobodan Gligorijevic, MD, EDRA; Giorgio Ivani, MD, PhD, EDRA; Narinder Rawal, MD, PhD, EDRA, FRCA; Harald Rettig, MD, PhD, EDRA; Athina Vadalouca, MD, PhD; Marc Van De Velde, MD, PhD, EDRA)

2.     ESRA Newsletter, No 1, September 1998.

3.     ESRA Newsletter, No 2, Spring 1999.

4.     The International monitor of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, 1992 – 2004.

5.     Highlights in Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, 1992 – 2010.

6.     Kietaibl S, Ferrandis R, Godier A, Llau J, Lobo C, Macfarlane AJ, Schlimp CJ, Vandermeulen E, Volk T, Von Heymann C, Wolmarans M, Afshari A. Regional anaesthesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs: Joint ESAIC/ESRA guidelines. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2022; 39(2): 100 – 132.

7.     ICM – VTE General Delegates*. Recommendations from the ICM – VTE (Recommendations of the International Consensus Group on Venous Thromboembolism after Orthopaedic Procedures). J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2022; 104(Suppl 1): 4 – 162.

8.     Bowness JS, Pawa A, Turbitt L, Bellew B, Bedforth N, Burckett-St Laurent D, Delbos A, Elkassabany N, Ferry J, Fox B, French JLH, Grant C, Gupta A, Harrop-Griffiths W, Haslam N, Higham H, Hogg R, Johnston DF, Kearns RJ, Kopp S, Lobo C, McKinlay S, Memtsoudis S, Merjavy P, Moka E, Narayanan M, Narouze S, Noble JA, Phillips D, Rosenblatt M, Sadler A, Sebastian MP, Taylor A, Thottungal A, Valdés-Vilches LF, Volk T, West S, Wolmarans M, Womack J, Macfarlane AJR. International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2022; 47(2): 106 – 112.

9.     Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam RV, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dirzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo C, Lucas ND, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Evidence–based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: A consensus report from a multisociety international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2023; Epub online ahead of print – Article in press.

10.  Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam R, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dirzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo CA, Lucas ND, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache from a Multisociety, International Working Group: A Summary Report. JAMA Netw Open, 2023; 6(8): e2325387.

11.  ESRA Official Website: www.esraeurope.org [assessed 30th June 2024].


Athina VADALOUCA (Athens, Greece)
08:23 - 08:41 Spinal Opioids: Evolution during 5 Decades and New Postoperative Monitoring Recommendations. Narinder RAWAL (Mentor PhD students, research collaboration) (Keynote Speaker, Stockholm, Sweden)
08:41 - 08:59 #43240 - B30 Adjuvants in Regional Anesthesia: Lessons Learned.
Adjuvants in Regional Anesthesia: Lessons Learned.

Andre Van Zundert (1), Kai Woodfall (2), Ekladious Shady (3), Nikolae Robert (3)

1. Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital & The University of Queensland, Herston-Brisbane, Australia
2. Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital & The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, none, Brisbane, Australia
3. Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital & The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, none, Brisbane, QLD, Australia


Key Reasons why Regional Anesthesia is Preferred by Patients, Surgeons and Anesthesiologists

The choice of anesthesia must be tailored to each patient’s specific circumstances and the type of surgery. However, regional anesthesia (RA) offers numerous benefits over general anesthesia (GA) for many surgical patients and has been advocated as a valuable adjunct to a multimodal analgesic regimen. These benefits span across overall experience and patient safety, i.e., improved pain management, higher patient comfort and satisfaction, faster recovery, reduced systemic side effects, and fewer respiratory and cardiovascular complications. 

In terms of environmental impact, RA has several benefits compared to GA: a) complete avoidance of potent anesthetic greenhouse gases results in a decreased atmospheric pollution, a smaller carbon footprint, and reduced long-term pollution; b) lower energy consumption as the patient is in the operating room for a shorter time, requires less monitoring and less electrically-operated medical equipment, and reduces the need for intense ventilation to clear anesthetic gases, which itself engenders significant energy use; c)  RA generates less disposable consumption, leading to less medical waste; d) localized delivery of anesthetic agents reduces the overall quantity of pharmaceuticals entering the environment through patient excretion and drug wastage; e) some equipment used in RA, i.e., nerve stimulators, ultrasound devices, is reusable and has a longer lifespan compared to the single use items often used for GA. One potential environmental downside for RA compared to GA is an increased burden of sterilization and thus electrical consumption. However, this is unlikely to offset the overall environmental benefit of RA.

Some of the key reasons why RA is often preferred include: a) improved pain management: RA provides targeted pain relief at the surgical site, leaving the areas above and below surgery unaffected. Perioperative pain relief is often superior by effectively controlling pain with local anesthetics (LAs), decreasing the need for systemic opioids, thereby lowering the risk of opioid-related side effects and dependency; b) enhanced recovery and mobility: Patients often recover more quickly from RA, experiencing less grogginess and confusion compared to those recovering from GA. This facilitates earlier postoperative mobilization, which is crucial for reducing risks of complications (e.g., deep vein thrombosis) and promoting faster overall recovery; c) fewer respiratory complications due to the avoidance of airway manipulation and preservation of respiratory function: GA requires airway management with its inherent complications (sore throat, hoarseness, and in severe cases, aspiration or respiratory distress). RA avoids these risks by eliminating the need for intubation, preserving the patient’s respiratory function, allowing spontaneous breathing. RA is particularly beneficial for those with existing respiratory conditions; d) cardiovascular stability due to reduced hemodynamic fluctuation: RA typically results in more stable blood pressure and heart rate compared to the hemodynamic changes that can occur with the induction and emergence phases of GA. For patients with cardiovascular conditions, the reduced stress on the heart makes RA a safer option; e) reduced systematic side effects due to the minimized drug exposure and lowered risk of cognitive dysfunction: RA involves less exposure to systemic medications, reducing the risk of drug-related side effects, i.e., nausea and vomiting, and respiratory depression. GA can lead to postoperative cognitive delirium and dysfunction, particularly in the elderly population. RA reduces this risk by avoiding systemic sedatives and anesthetics that affect the brain; f) higher overall patient satisfaction and comfort: RA allows the patients to remain awake or lightly sedated during surgery, allowing them to avoid the disorienting effects of GA; g) RA may not be suitable for all types of surgeries or all types of patients. However, for many complex surgeries that typically require GA, RA can complement by providing excellent pain relief; and h) RA is cost-effective: RA allows faster recovery times which can lead to shorter hospital stays, which is cost-effective for healthcare and the patient. The decreased use of systemic anesthetics and opioids may lower the overall cost of medications.

Whether LAs provide the best perioperative analgesia depends on various factors, including the type of surgery, patient characteristics, and the desired outcomes. LAs provide targeted pain relief by blocking nerve signals in the area of administration, which can be very effective for many surgical procedures using central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blockade, with long-lasting pain relief if catheters are used, often combined with continuous infusion pumps. LAs can be used in various forms, including topical applications, infiltration blockade, nerve blocks, and spinal, epidural or combined anesthesia techniques, making them versatile for different surgical needs.

 

Limitations of LAs

LAs are highly effective for perioperative pain management, providing targeted analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. However, there are limitations using solely LAs: a) insufficient duration of action: the analgesic effect of LAs is limited to the duration of the block, which may not cover the entire perioperative period. Longer-acting agents, continuous infusion techniques and the use of adjuvants can mitigate these limitations but will add to the complexity of blocks; b) incomplete RA blockade requires supplemental pain management strategies; c) LAs are generally safe but still can cause complications such as LA systemic toxicity (LAST) due to massive resorption or intravascular injections, allergic reactions, or damage to muscles (LA-induced myotoxicity and myo-degeneration), nerves, or spinal cord if improperly administered or when high doses are used.1

However, their limitations in duration and potential for incomplete pain relief make them most effective when used as part of a multimodal pain management strategy. By combining LAs with other analgesics, adjuvants, and techniques, anesthesiologists can achieve optimal pain control tailored to individual patient needs and surgical contexts.

 

Adjuvants to LAs

As the indications for RA have gradually expanded, adjuvants are frequently incorporated to enhance patient safety and comfort, improve efficacy, onset, quality and duration of analgesia, reduce the required dose of LAs and minimize potential side effects.2-6

The benefits of these adjuvants include a faster onset of block, improved hemodynamic stability, reduced postoperative opioid requirements, anti-inflammatory effects, and additional anxiolysis and sedation. These advantages contribute to better pain management, increased patient satisfaction, enhanced clinical outcomes, and improved overall perioperative results. These substances can be added to LAs for various types of regional blocks, including peripheral nerve blocks, fascia blocks, central neuraxial blocks, ophthalmic blocks, and intravenous RA blocks, with the intention of blocking transmission to avoid or relieve pain. Anesthesiologists select these adjuvants based on specific clinical scenarios and surgical interventions, patient-specific factors, type of RA, desired effects, and a balance of their benefits against potential side effects.

Table 1 provides an unrestricted list of potential useful adjuvants to LAs for a variety of RA blocks, including central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. Suggested doses are provided, though clinicians need to verify each dosage according to their local circumstances, the surgical intervention, and the individual patient. LAs and adjuvants are used in a large range of medication types, volumes, doses, and concentrations. It is crucial to consider the appropriate drug in the right volume/concentration/dose for each specific RA technique. Clinicians should evaluate all substances in the correct LA solution for the right indication before any injection. Not all RA adjuvants have been approved by the regulators or licensed for neuraxial administration in all countries, and some preparations may contain additives, such as preservatives that are potentially neurotoxic. In specific clinical circumstances (e.g., existing diabetic neuropathy) some practice modifications may be considered to reduce the risk of overdose, side effects and complications.7 Clinicians need to be diligent about monitoring for the development of adverse side effects and complications from LAs and RA adjuvants and their immediate appropriate management. These common side effects limit their clinical use and may pose an even greater threat in certain procedures, including organ damage. 

Opioids act as agonists at G-protein coupled inhibitory receptors, i.e., mu, kappa, delta, and nociceptin. These opioid receptors are widespread throughout the brain (cerebrum, thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdalae, basal ganglia, brainstem, reticular activating system), spinal cord, and non-neural tissues (gastrointestinal tract). Side effects often seen following neuraxial administration of opioids due to their cephalad spread in the CSF or systemic absorption from the epidural space, include pruritus, PONV, urinary retention, and respiratory depression. Minute doses of fentanyl or sufentanil are useful adjuvants to low-dose LAs.8,9

Adverse effects following the administration of LA mixtures are a concern, including cardiopulmonary, neurological, and renal complications, as well as uncommon reactions such as allergy and rarely malignant hyperthermia. Adjuvants to LAs have their own side effects (see Table 1). Therefore, further research on the development of novel LA adjuvants is necessary.

Liposomal bupivacaine is an example of an extended-release formulation that allows for a slow release of bupivacaine HCl from its liposomes. Another promising avenue is the use of exosomes, a class of new bioactive substances released from specific cells, which show unique effects in repairing damaged tissues and organs.10Exosomes released from cardiomyocytes after exercise have powerful cardioprotective effects, while those released from mesenchymal stem cells can improve neural cell damage. Exosomes originating from the cerebrospinal fluid can promote neuronal repair processes.  Exosomes may help to overcome the hazards of LA adjuvants, such as cardiovascular, neurotoxic and gastrointestinal risks. Animal research has demonstrated that exosomes derived from different tissue cell sources exhibit repair functions after ischemia-reperfusion injuries, causing cellular metabolic acidosis and short-term organ damage. Exosomes released by specific cell types have been found to exert similar effects as many LA adjuvants. Therefore, these exosomal anesthetic adjuvants can be considered as novel LA adjuvant drugs with additional organ repair functions due to their reduction of the inflammatory response and pain relief. Exosomes exhibit reno-, neuro- and cardioprotective effects and immunosuppressive effects similar to those of stem cells. Reduction of postoperative pain is associated with exosomes of macrophage origin. 

There are numerous aspects of RA adjuvants that were not addressed in this manuscript: a) all adjuvants available for use during RA, i.e., neostigmine and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs; b) alternative locally administered analgesic agents that have local anesthetic properties, e.g., tramadol; c) the efficacy of perioperative gabapentin in the treatment of postoperative pain; d) which adjuvants are preferred for specific circumstances e.g., which opioid is superior for a specific RA block; e) adjuvants that are better avoided due to their potential for adverse effects, limited efficacy, or safety concerns, e.g., vasopressin; f) the maximum dosage used in the different blocks; g) the potential of novel local anesthetics with protracted analgesic effect and minimal toxicity, which are neurotoxins isolated from animals, plants, and marine organisms, e.g., α-cobratoxin (α-CTx). The latter is isolated from the Thailand Cobra, which has strong affinity for the α7 subunit of the nAChR (α7nAChR) neuronal receptor of the peripheral nervous system. This neurotoxin leads to the depolarization of postsynaptic membranes and the prevention of neurotransmitter release, hence causing pain relief.

 

Conclusion

Medications used in anesthesia represent one of the greatest discoveries in medical history, revolutionizing pain management and patient care. The indications for LAs and RA blocks have gradually expanded, often in combination with general anesthesia. When used appropriately, adjuvants can significantly enhance the efficacy of RA, though potential adverse reactions must be carefully managed. These additives may improve the RA block’s quality, onset time, duration, or performance (such as motor blockade). Drugs utilized during RA procedures play a crucial role in perioperative pain prevention and relief.

The growing interest in RA techniques has spurred efforts to extend the duration of LAs. The development of LA adjuvants has been instrumental in mitigating the side effects and complications associated with large doses of LAs, including systemic and neurotoxicity risks. These adjuvants have effectively reduced LA toxicity, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased pain experiences. Adjuvants have also enhanced the speed of recovery, facilitated operator convenience, reduced postoperative delirium and increased the efficiency and safety of RA procedures. Continued research and innovation in new LA adjuvants will further advance the field of anesthesia, offering safer and more effective pain management solutions.

 

 

References

 

1.         Hussain N, McCartney CJL, Neal JM, Chippor J, Banfield L, Abdallah FW. Local anaesthetic-induced myotoxicity in regional anaesthesia: a systematic review and empirical analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):822-841. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.076. PMID: 30236244.

2.         Bao N, Shi K, Wu Y, He Y, Chen Z, Gao Y, Xia Y, Papadimos TJ, Wang Q, Zhou R. Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant through both perineural and systemic mechanisms: a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01716-3. PMID: 35672660; PMCID: PMC9172023.

3.         Martin MTF, Alvarez Lopez S, Aldecoa Alvarez-Santullano C. Role of adjuvants in regional anesthesia: A systematic review. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2023 Feb;70(2):97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2021.06.006. PMID: 36813032.

4.         Coppens SJR, Zawodny Z, Dewinter G, Neyrinck A, Balocco AL, Rex S. In search of the Holy Grail: Poisons and extended release local anesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;33(1):3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.002. PMID: 31272651.

5.         Prabhakar A, Lambert T, Kaye RJ, Gaignard SM, Ragusa J, Wheat S, Moll V, Cornett EM, Urman RD, Kaye AD. Adjuvants in clinical regional anesthesia practice: A comprehensive review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;33(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.06.001. Erratum in: Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Dec;35(4):E3-E4. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.09.002. PMID: 31791560.

6.         Tresierra S, Gilron I, Mizubuti GB. Adjuvant Medications for Peripheral Nerve Blocks. ATOTW 489, 2023. https://resources.wfsahq.org/anaesthesia-tutorial-of-the-week/

7.         Lirk P, Brummett CM. Regional anaesthesia, diabetic neuropathy, and dexmedetomidine: a neurotoxic combination? Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):16-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.017. PMID: 30579401.

8.         Dong J, Jin Z, Chen H, Bao N, Xia F. Sufentanil Improves the Analgesia Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Pain Res. 2023 Dec 7;16:4209-4216. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S409668. PMID: 38090025; PMCID: PMC10712246.

9.         Kim SY, Cho JE, Hong JY, Koo BN, Kim JM, Kil HK. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil in low-dose dilute bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):750-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep263. PMID: 19797249. 

10.   Zhang Y, Feng S, Cheng X, Lou K, Liu X, Zhuo M, Chen L, Ye J. The potential value of exosomes as adjuvants for novel biologic local anesthetics. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1112743. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1112743. PMID: 36778004; PMCID: PMC9909291.


Andre VAN ZUNDERT (Brisbane Australia, Australia)
08:59 - 09:17 PNBs: From paraesthesia techniques to advanced US-guided blocks. Balavenkat SUBRAMANIAN (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Coimbatore, India)
09:17 - 09:35 RA in obstetrics: More than a century of advances. Nuala LUCAS (Speaker) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
09:35 - 09:50 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C30
08:00 - 08:50

PRO CON DEBATE
Rebound pain has a biological basis

Chairperson: Hari KALAGARA (Assistant Professor) (Chairperson, Florida, USA)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Hari KALAGARA (Assistant Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Florida, USA)
08:05 - 08:20 For the PROs. Sina GRAPE (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Sion, Switzerland)
08:20 - 08:35 For the CONs. Thomas WIESMANN (Head of the Dept.) (Keynote Speaker, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)
08:35 - 08:50 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D30
08:00 - 08:50

ASK THE EXPERT
AI FOR GOOD

Chairperson: Philippe GAUTIER (MD) (Chairperson, BRUSSELS, Belgium)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Philippe GAUTIER (MD) (Keynote Speaker, BRUSSELS, Belgium)
08:05 - 08:35 HOW I use AI. Rajnish GUPTA (Professor of Anesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Nashville, USA)
08:35 - 08:50 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E30
08:00 - 08:35

TIPS & TRICKS
LAST

Chairperson: Manoj KARMAKAR (Professor, Consultant, Director of Pediatric Anesthesia) (Chairperson, Shatin, Hong Kong)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Manoj KARMAKAR (Professor, Consultant, Director of Pediatric Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Shatin, Hong Kong)
08:05 - 08:25 Updates in our understanding of local anaesthetic systemic. Alan MACFARLANE (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
08:25 - 08:30 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F30
08:00 - 08:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Needle tracking technology

Chairperson: Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Chairperson, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (Keynote Speaker, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
08:05 - 08:35 Practice of needle tracking. Graeme MCLEOD (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Dundee, United Kingdom)
08:35 - 08:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G30
08:00 - 09:50

NETWORKING SESSION
Complications in obstetric anaesthesia

Chairperson: Eva ROOFTHOOFT (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Haacht, Belgium)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Eva ROOFTHOOFT (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Haacht, Belgium)
08:05 - 08:27 High neuraxial block. Kassiani THEODORAKI (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
08:27 - 08:49 The inadvertent intrathecal catheter. Sarah DEVROE (Head of clinic) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
08:49 - 09:11 #43394 - G30 Amniotic fluid embolism.
Amniotic fluid embolism.

Tatjana Stopar Pintaric (1), Andrej Hostnik (1)
1. Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia

1.     Introduction

Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare but often lethal condition typically observed during labor or within 30 minutes postpartum, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 in 8000 to 1 in 80000 deliveries. Specific risk factors for AFE might include advanced maternal age, placenta praevia, IVF pregnancies, fetal demise, preterm delivery and cesarean sections. Its pathophysiology, while not fully understood, is believed to involve vasospastic, inflammatory and immune reactions triggered by the presence of amniotic debris or other antigens in the maternal circulation. Young et al. recently proposed a new theory of pathophysiology with initial intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary circulation due to procoagulant surface antigen CD142 present in amniotic fluid, followed by derangements similar to any pulmonary embolism.

 2.     Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

AFE should be suspected intrapartum or in the immediate postpartum period in women experiencing sudden cardiovascular collapse, sudden respiratory distress and subsequent coagulopathy, particularly when no other explanations (such as postpartum haemmorhage, sepsis, pulmonary thromboembolism) are apparent. Clinical manifestations may include hypotension, arrhythmia, heart failure, shock, pulmonary edema, hypoxaemia, hemorrhagic coagulopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) and neurologic symptoms such as seizures or altered mental status. Identification of amniotic fluid debris in blood or lung tissue samples is not diagnostically useful.

 3.     Management

Early recognition and prompt multidisciplinary care involving anaesthesiologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, critical care specialists and nurses is crucial for stabilizing patients and preventing further deterioration. Resuscitative efforts should be initiated concurrently with diagnostic evaluation to address cardiorespiratory compromise. Standard cardiac and respiratory life support measures, along with fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy, and transfusion of blood products, are essential components of initial management. Point-of-care testing, such as rotational thromboelastometry can be useful in diagnosing coagulopathy and guiding treatment, which might neccessitate use of fibrinogen and/or prothrombin complex. ECMO and cardipulmonary bypass should be considered when appropriate. The decision for immediate delivery should be made based on individual circumstances, with consideration given to fetal viability and maternal condition. For patients who stabilize following initial resuscitation or who present hemodynamically stable, supportive care focusing on airway management, hemodynamic stability, oxygenation, and prevention of bleeding is paramount. Further investigation should be performed to rule out alternative aetiologies.

 4.     Prognosis

Despite improvements in management, AFE continues to carry significant maternal mortality and morbidity, with approximately 20% mortality rate and potential for neurologic sequelae in survivors due to cerebral hypoxia. Neonatal mortality rate is 20-25% and only 50% of the survivors may be neurologically intact.

 

5.     Literature

1.     Young BK, Florine Magdelijns P, Chervenak JL, Chan M. Amniotic fluid embolism: A reappraisal. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2023;52(2):126-135. doi:10.1515/jpm-2023-0365

2.     Gist RS, Stafford IP, Leibowitz AB, Beilin Y. Amniotic fluid embolism. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2009;108(5):1599-1602. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e43a4

3.     Benson MD. Amniotic fluid embolism mortality rate. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2017;43(11):1714-1718. doi:10.1111/jog.13445

4.     Loughran JA, Kitchen TL, Sindhakar S, Ashraf M, Awad M, Kealaher EJ. Rotational thromboelastometry (Rotem®)-guided diagnosis and management of amniotic fluid embolism. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2019;38:127-130. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.09.001

5.     Clark SL. Amniotic fluid embolism. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;123(2):337-348. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000107

6.     Clark SL, Romero R, Dildy GA, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the case definition of amniotic fluid embolism in research studies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215(4):408-412. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.037

 


Tatjana STOPAR PINTARIC (Ljubljana, Slovenia)
09:11 - 09:33 Cardiac arrest in obstetrics. Alexandra SCHYNS-VAN DEN BERG (Consultant anesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
09:33 - 09:50 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
O30
08:00 - 11:00

OFF SITE - Hands - On Cadaver Workshop 7 - RA
UPPER & LOWER LIMB BLOCKS, TRUNK BLOCKS

WS Leader: Peter MERJAVY (Consultant Anaesthetist & Acute Pain Lead) (WS Leader, Craigavon, United Kingdom)
Unique and exclusive for RA & Pain Cadaveric Workshops: Only whole-body cadavers will be available for the workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity to master your needling skills, perform the actual blocks on fresh cadavers and to improve your ergonomics under direct supervision of world experts in regional anaesthesia and chronic pain management. There won’t be an organized transportation for going/back from the Cadaver workshop.
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 1. Upper Limb Blocks. Ana LOPEZ (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Barcelona, Spain)
ISB, SCB, AxB, cervical plexus (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 2. Upper Limb and chest Blocks. Ruediger EICHHOLZ (Owner, CEO) (Demonstrator, Stuttgart, Germany)
ICB, IPPB/PSPB (PECS), SAPB (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 3. Thoracic trunk blocks. Laurent DELAUNAY (Anaesthesiologist, Intensivist and perioperative medicine) (Demonstrator, ANNECY, France)
Th PVB, ESP, ITP (Prone Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 4. Abdominal trunk Blocks. Vishal UPPAL (Professor) (Demonstrator, Halifax, Canada, Canada)
TAP, RSB, IH/II (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 5. Lower limb blocks. David DOLEZAL (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)
SiFiB, PENG, FEMB, FTB, Aductor Canal B, Obturator (Supine Position)
08:00 - 11:00 Workstation 6. Lower limb blocks. Matthew OLDMAN (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Plymouth, United Kingdom)
QLBs, proximal and distal sciatic B, iPACK (Lateral Position)
Anatomy Institute

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H30
08:00 - 10:00

SIMULATION TRAININGS

Demonstrators: Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Demonstrator, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Roman ZUERCHER (Senior Consultant) (Demonstrator, Basel, Switzerland)
NORTH HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
I30
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 8 - CHRONIC PAIN
US Use in Chronic Pain Medicine - Head and Neck

WS Leader: Gustavo FABREGAT (Anesthesiologist) (WS Leader, Valencia, Spain)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Supraorbital & Occipital Nerve (GON, TON, LON) Blocks. Raja REDDY (Consultant Anaesthetist & Pain Physician) (Demonstrator, Kent, United Kingdom)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Maxillary Nerve Block. Magdalena ANITESCU (Professor of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine) (Demonstrator, Chicago, USA)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Cervical Medial Branch Block. Manfred GREHER (Medical Hospital Director and Head of Department) (Demonstrator, Vienna, Austria)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Stellate Ganglion Block. Thomas HAAG (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Oswestry, United Kingdom)
220a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
J30
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 9 - CHRONIC PAIN
US Use in Common Nerves Blockade for Chronic Pain Management

WS Leader: Luis Fernando VALDES VILCHES (Clinical head) (WS Leader, Marbella, Spain)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Cervical Roots & Suprascapular Nerve (various levels approaches). Pavel MICHALEK (Deputy Director for Science, Research and Education) (Demonstrator, Praha, Czech Republic)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric, Genitofemoral and Obturator Nerves, including hip branches (LCT, Saphenous, Genicular Nerves). Michal BUT (Consultant pain clinic) (Demonstrator, Koszalin, Poland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Posterior Pelvis Sonoanatomy (I) / Superior Gluteal Nerve, Piriformis Muscle, Pudendal Nerve. Humberto-Costa REBELO (Physician) (Demonstrator, Villa Nova Gaia, Portugal)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Posterior Pelvis Sonoanatomy (II) / Inferior Cluneal Nerve, Sciatic Nerve, Ischial Tuberosity. Nicole PORZ (Leitende Ärztin) (Demonstrator, Bern, Switzerland)
221a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
K30
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 5 - POCUS
POCUS in Emergency Room and ICU

WS Leader: Svetlana GALITZINE (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Leader, Oxford, United Kingdom)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Airway Ultrasound (Difficult Airway Predictors, Vocal Cords, Cricothyroid Membrane Location). Francois RETIEF (Head Clinical Unit) (Demonstrator, Cape Town, South Africa)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Lung Ultrasound (Normal Lung, Pneumothorax, Pleural Effusion). Barbara RUPNIK (Consultant anesthetist) (Demonstrator, Zurich, Switzerland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST). Wolf ARMBRUSTER (Head of Department, Clinical Director) (Demonstrator, Unna, Germany)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: FOCUS (I) - Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT), Pulmonary Thromboembolism (PE indirect signs), Cardiac Tamponade. Valentina RANCATI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Lausanne, Switzerland)
223a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
L30
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 18 - RA
Peripheral Nerve Blocks Above Clavicle

WS Leader: Aysu SALVIZ (Attending Anesthesiologist) (WS Leader, St. Louis, USA)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Interscalene Block. Can AKSU (Professor) (Demonstrator, Kocaeli, Turkey)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Suprascapular Nerve Block. Attila BONDAR (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Cork, Ireland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Axillary Nerve Block. Mario FAJARDO PEREZ (Anesthesia) (Demonstrator, Madrid, Spain)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Supraclavicular and Retroclavicular Nerve Blocks. Xavier SALA-BLANCH (chief of orthopedics anaesthesia) (Demonstrator, BARCELONA, Spain)
241

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
M30
08:00 - 10:00

HANDS ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 19 - RA
Necessary Blocks to Know for Pain Free TKA

WS Leader: Hosim PRASAI THAPA (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Leader, Melbourne, Australia, Australia)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 1: Femoral Nerve Block. David MOORE (Pain Specialist) (Demonstrator, Dublin, Ireland)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 2: Blocks of Obturator Nerve and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve of the Thigh. Xavier CAPDEVILA (MD, PhD, Professor, Head of department) (Demonstrator, Médecin, Montpellier, France)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 3: Sciatic Nerve Block. Maria TILELI (Anaesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Athens, Greece)
08:00 - 10:00 Workstation 4: Adductor Canal Block & iPACK. Jose Alejandro AGUIRRE (Head of Ambulatory Center Europaallee) (Demonstrator, Zurich, Switzerland)
245

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A30
08:00 - 09:50

NETWORKING SESSION
Paediatric RA
PAEDIATRIC

Chairperson: Kris VERMEYLEN (Md, PhD) (Chairperson, ZAS ANTWERP, Belgium)
08:00 - 08:05 Introduction. Kris VERMEYLEN (Md, PhD) (Keynote Speaker, ZAS ANTWERP, Belgium)
08:05 - 08:27 Chloroprocaine in pediatric regional anesthesia? Karen BORETSKY (Senior Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Boston, USA)
08:27 - 08:49 When to choose Caudal or Ilio-Inguinal block in children undergoing Inguinal Herniotomy. Luc TIELENS (pediatric anesthesiology staff member) (Keynote Speaker, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
08:49 - 09:11 Is there still a place for epidural anesthesia in infants? Markus STEVENS (anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
09:11 - 09:33 Regional anesthesia and ambulatory procedures. An TEUNKENS (Clinical Head, associate professor KU Leuven) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
09:33 - 09:50 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL
08:40

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E31
08:40 - 09:50

PANEL DISCUSSION
PEDIATRIC RA training - Workforce

Chairperson: Nat HASLAM (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Sunderland, United Kingdom)
08:40 - 08:45 Introduction. Nat HASLAM (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Sunderland, United Kingdom)
08:45 - 09:05 Training standards for Pediatric RA in Sweden. Per-Arne LONNQVIST (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Stockholm, Sweden)
09:05 - 09:25 Assuring Training in Pediatric RA in Greece. Eleana GARINI (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Athens, Greece)
09:25 - 09:45 Matching RA to Specific Pediatric Procedures. Peter KENDERESSY (Senior Consultant and Lecturer in Paediatric Anaesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
09:45 - 09:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2A
09:00

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C31
09:00 - 09:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Conflicts in the OR and avoiding nerve injury

Chairperson: Maria Paz SEBASTIAN (Anaestheics and Acute Pain) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Maria Paz SEBASTIAN (Anaestheics and Acute Pain) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
09:05 - 09:25 How to deal with conflict in operating theatre. Geert-Jan VAN GEFFEN (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, NIjmegen, The Netherlands)
09:25 - 09:30 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D31
09:00 - 09:50

PRO CON DEBATE
Liposomal Bupivacaine

Chairperson: Margaretha (Barbara) BREEBAART (anaesthestist) (Chairperson, Antwerp, Belgium)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Margaretha (Barbara) BREEBAART (anaesthestist) (Keynote Speaker, Antwerp, Belgium)
09:05 - 09:20 For the PROs. Admir HADZIC (Director) (Keynote Speaker, New York, USA)
09:20 - 09:35 For the CONs. eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Lausanne, Switzerland)
09:35 - 09:50 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F31
09:00 - 09:50

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Chronic pain in specific cases

Chairperson: Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chief of pain medicine department) (Chairperson, Vinnitsa, Ukraine)
09:00 - 09:05 Introduction. Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chief of pain medicine department) (Keynote Speaker, Vinnitsa, Ukraine)
09:05 - 09:20 Chronic pain after eye surgery. Friedrich LERSCH (senior consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Berne, Switzerland)
09:20 - 09:35 CRPS in a toddler. Amany EZZAT AYAD (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Cairo, Egypt)
09:35 - 09:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2B
10:00 COFFEE BREAK

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S2
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 2

Chairperson: Wojciech GOLA (Consultant) (Chairperson, Kielce, Poland)
10:00 - 10:05 #40090 - EP175 Ultrasound guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric nerve block in children: right technique, right dose and right place!!
EP175 Ultrasound guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric nerve block in children: right technique, right dose and right place!!

The ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block (IINB) is a well practiced regional anesthesia (RA) technique for inguinal surgeries in children. IINB is considered as effective as caudal block for peri-operative analgesia. Ultrasound guidance (USG) of IINB offers advantage of direct visualization of nerves, helps decreasing the volume of local anaesthetics (LA) used and thus, increases safety. This study aimed at proving efficacy of USG IINB, using low volume of LA, defining the surrounding anatomical structures in children.

We studied various scientific papers, meta-analysis and review articles published between 2005-2023 related to IINB in paediatric unilateral inguinal surgeries like orchidopexy and inguinal hernia repair. The conventional fascial pop techniques using large volume of LA are replaced with precise visualization of nerve and needle during USG IINB, enabling use of ultra low volume of drugs to achieve high quality block.

"RA always works provided you put the right dose of the right drug in the right place." This adage reflects the true reality of RA. Accurate placement of LA around IIN in children is seldom possible using landmark technique. USG ensures the right place between internal oblique and transversus abdominus, avoiding injury to adjacent structures. The distance between skin-IIN is 5-10mm, and between IIN-peritoneum is around 3-5mm in children. Using USG IINB , an effective block can be achieved using volume of 0.25% Levobupivacaine as low as 0.075ml/kg.

The use of USG IINB enables the administration of ultra low volume of LA at correct fascial plane with maximum efficacy in children undergoing inguinal surgeries.
Sameer KAPOOR (DUBAI, United Arab Emirates), Ghassan KLOUB
10:05 - 10:10 #42739 - EP180 Investigating the mechanism of action of the posterior quadratus lumborum injection: A cadaveric Study.
EP180 Investigating the mechanism of action of the posterior quadratus lumborum injection: A cadaveric Study.

Posterior quadratus lumborum block (QL2), has been implemented as a part of multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain relief after abdominal surgery. However, cadaveric studies did not demonstrate an effective dye spread to the thoracic paravertebral space, the target are for mechanism of action. We aimed to determine, the spread of injectate in QL 2 blocks

In 2 cadavers donated through body donation programme for science studies, QL2 injections were performed, with 30ml of 0.1% methylene blue dye. On the 2nd day, cross-sections were executed in one cadaver and open dissections was performed in the other. The cross-sections and the open dissections were examined in detail for the diffusion of the dye by anatomist and co-anaesthesiologist not involved in injection

The cross-sections revealed spread of the dye in following planes : Posterior surface of QL, Lateral to QL, Lateral in transverses abdominis plane (TAP plane). Open dissections depicted dye spread in soaking the ilio-inguinal, ilio-hypogastric and the sub-costal nerves. Exploring the lumbar plexus did not reveal staining of nerves. However, the visceral and parietal peritoneum was stained

The mechanism of action of QL2 is probably through the lateral diffusion in the TAP plane and a caudal spread in the visceral plane.
Sandeep DIWAN, Manjuladevi MUNINARASIMHIAH (INDIA, India), Prakash MANE
10:10 - 10:15 #41256 - EP176 Comparison between Catheter-over-needle and Self-coiling Catheter for Continuous Femoral Triangle Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
EP176 Comparison between Catheter-over-needle and Self-coiling Catheter for Continuous Femoral Triangle Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Continuous femoral triangle block (c-FTB) is used to extend postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, catheter tip migration can occur during infusion and may fail to provide good postoperative pain relief. In this study, we retrospectively compared pain scores and the incidence of catheter tip migration during c-FTB in patients undergoing TKA between catheter-over-needle and self-coiling catheter.

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional IRB (study number: 20231109-2). We analyzed the data of patients who underwent TKA with c-FTB between March and December 2023. A CON (E-Cath, PAJUNK, Geisingen, Germany) or self-coiling catheter (Pain Clinic Set, Hakko, Chikuma, Japan) was inserted using an in-plane approach with a short-axis view for c-FTB. Patients also received IPACK block and local infiltration analgesia. Appropriate catheter tip position was confirmed by injecting a small amount of saline under ultrasound immediately and 24h after surgery. The incidence of catheter tip migration and postoperative pain scores were compared between the two types of catheters.

Data of 47 patients (19 and 28 patients for CON and self-soiling catheter, respectively) were analyzed. At 24h after surgery, catheter tip migration occurred in 68.4% and 7.1% of the patients using CON and self-soiling catheter, respectively (p<0.001). Postoperative pain scores did not differ between the two catheters.

The incidence of catheter tip migration was lower for self-coiling catheter compared with CON when used for c-FTB. Postoperative pain level was similar for two types of catheters.
Yuki AOYAMA (Izumo, Japan), Shinichi SAKURA, Kotaro GUNJI, Tetsuro NIKAI
10:15 - 10:20 #42684 - EP178 Patient experience of a regional anaesthesia enhanced ambulatory pathway for soft tissue upper limb surgery.
EP178 Patient experience of a regional anaesthesia enhanced ambulatory pathway for soft tissue upper limb surgery.

The ambulatory pathway for upper limb trauma surgery at cork University Hospital has incorporated ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia as the principal anaesthesia modality. The anaesthesia model of care incorporates: single shot axillary brachial plexus block (AxBPB); perioperative dexamethasone; and postoperative multimodal oral analgesia. The aim of this service evaluation was to ascertain an objective assessment of patient experience.

A prospective audit was performed during March and April 2024. Thirty non-consecutive patients opportunistically sampled, undergoing ambulatory upper limb surgery under AxBPB were included. Patients were contacted by telephone 2 days postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was measured using a 6 point likert scale (0-5) to evaluate satisfaction with anaesthesia, analgesia and their overall experience with the ambulatory care pathway. A priori threshold score of greater than or equal to 4 was defined as the audit standard. Patient data was compared with historical non-paired controls (2022) to evaluate pathway performance over time under two tail Mann Whitney U test.

Median [range] satisfaction scores were 5 [4-5], 5 [3-5], 5 [3-5] for anaesthesia, analgesia and overall ambulatory experiences. When compared to historical controls (2022), no significant difference was found. P-value were 0.4913, 0.2151, 0.4913 in anaesthesia, analgesia and overall ambulatory experiences. No perioperative and post-operative complication noticed.

Patient satisfaction is high for this ambulatory upper limb soft tissue trauma pathway enhanced by regional anaesthesia. Patient satisfaction was similar to historical controls, suggesting sustainability of the pathway over time, notwithstanding changes in personnel frequently encountered in a university teaching hospital setting.
Chirs Yen-Chen LO (Cork, Ireland), Nisha CHAUNDARY, Naseer KHAN, Santosh KUMAR, Brian O'DONNELL
10:20 - 10:25 #42723 - EP179 Peripheral nerve block follow up in a district general hospital.
EP179 Peripheral nerve block follow up in a district general hospital.

The role of peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy continues to grow. Nerve damage is a feared complication of PNB for both patients and anaesthetists. Our project aimed to quantify the rate and severity of nerve injury following PNB in our district general hospital, alongside patient centred outcomes. Finally, we assessed the feasibility of a PNB telephone follow up service in our trust.

Single-shot nerve blocks over a 7-month period were logged. Patients were contacted 48 hours to 14 days post-procedure, where a questionnaire was administered. We collected data on neurological complications, patient satisfaction, and the patient experience of PNB and the follow up process.

221 blocks were logged, of which 187 met the criteria for follow up, with successful follow up in 69% of patients. Fourteen patients required ongoing follow up due to persisting sensory neurological symptoms with 13 patients reporting complete resolution at 6 weeks (Figure 1). High patient satisfaction rates were reported post PNB, 91.5% reporting as satisfied or very satisfied, and 94% of patients reporting adequate information provided about their PNB (Figure 2).

We have demonstrated that PNB was associated with high patient satisfaction and a low complication rate. A comprehensive follow up system is labour intensive, and requires further input to implement permanently. The upcoming 8th National Audit Project from the Royal College of Anaesthetists (UK) will provide a greater pool of results and form recommendations from which to inform our future practice.
John Paul MCNALLY-REILLY, John Paul MCNALLY-REILLY (London, United Kingdom), Andreas SOTIRIOU, Samantha MCEWAN, Julia HARRINGTON, Benjamin EDEN-GREEN, Meera KUMARAKULASINGHAM
10:25 - 10:30 #42207 - EP177 Purines and the quality of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
EP177 Purines and the quality of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

In addition, commonly known as neurotransmitters properties of some purines. Concentration of purines as neurotransmitters, may be correlated with characteristics of neuraxial block in spinal anesthesia.

We examined 30 pregnant women, who before starting spinal anesthesia for cesarean section was performed over the fence of venous blood, in the performance of spinal anesthesia (before the introduction of anesthesia) - fence CSF. Contents of purine bases was determined direct spectrophotometry in blood serum or cerebrospinal fluid in each of the purine metabolite wavelengths. Take into account the following characteristics of spinal anesthesia administered dose of mg spinal ropivacaine, speed of onset, depth and height of the spread of spinal block, the need for additional administration of intravenous analgesics and anesthetics.

Dose spinal ropivacaine correlated with blood guanine (r=0,73; p=0,040), hypoxanthine (r=0,82; p=0,013), adenine (r=0,77; p=0,023) and xanthine (R=0,71; p=0,046). Time of onset of adequate spinal block correlated with the blood guanine (r=0,89; p=0,003), hypoxanthine (r=0,85;p=0,008), xanthine (r=0,73; p=0,040), uric acid (r=0,78; p=0,022). Spinal block height correlated with blood guanine (R=0,74;p=0,035), and xanthine (R=0,71;p=0,048). Mothers with high-quality, adequate spinal block, which do not require the additional use of intravenous anesthetics differed from women with a low, not enough adequate spinal block, a lower concentration of guanine in blood serum (Mann-Whitney U Test, p=0,043)

The level of guanine in blood serum can be used to predict the quality of spinal anesthesia in obstetrics, possibly to define indications for preemptive use of combined spinal-epidural or general anesthesia instead of the single-stage single-dose spinal anesthesia.
Evgeny ORESHNIKOV (Cheboksary, Russia), Svetlana ORESHNIKOVA, Elvira VASILJEVA, Denisova TAMARA, Alexander ORESHNIKOV

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S6
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 6

Chairperson: Andrea TOGNU (Senior Consultant) (Chairperson, Bologna, Italy)
10:05 - 10:10 #42441 - EP200 Is cooling worthwhile? Long-term efficacy of Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) for chronic knee pain - an 8 years follow-up case report.
EP200 Is cooling worthwhile? Long-term efficacy of Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) for chronic knee pain - an 8 years follow-up case report.

The use of radiofrequency techniques targeting genicular nerves has become a viable option for managing refractory knee pain. Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) and pulsed radiofrequency(PRF) applied to peripheral nerves have demonstrated efficacy in pain reduction. Technical challenges such as charred tissue formation and optimal electrode placement present hurdles to achieving optimal outcomes. A novel approach, CRFA offers the potential for more comprehensive denervation. The utilization of larger, spherical lesion shapes minimizes missing target nerves and allows for greater flexibility in approach angles. There is a potential correlation between lesion size and the magnitude and duration of pain relief. We present a patient with chronic refractory knee pain in whom CRFA provided long-term pain relief.

A 65-year-old woman suffering from chronic refractory knee pain unresponsive to multiple treatments, including analgesics, physical therapy and bilateral knee replacement. Five left knee PRF(42oC;600”) yielded temporary relief, while minor improvement followed right knee PRF and three RFA(80oC;180”) sessions (2016-2021). Two CRFA(60oC;150“) sessions were performed on the left knee and one on the right (2022-2024).

CRFA led to a dramatic decrease in pain (VAS 9-10/10 to 0/10 at rest and 2/10 at walking). Significant and sustained pain relief for more than a year after each treatment, with no reported complications.

Our findings support CRFA as a safe and effective treatment modality for knee pain management, with superior long-term outcomes compared to traditional RF techniques. However, recent literature highlights limited and conflicting evidence, necessitating further clinical trials with extended follow-ups to validate the efficacy and safety profile of CRFA.
Rimma GELLER (Haifa, Israel)
10:10 - 10:15 #42468 - EP201 Comparing two techniques of continuous spinal anesthesia for patients with benign prostate hypertrophy for thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.
EP201 Comparing two techniques of continuous spinal anesthesia for patients with benign prostate hypertrophy for thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is common in men over 50. Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP) is a minimally invasive technique for treating BPH. A disadvantage of ThuLEP is the length of the procedure, which requires appropriate anesthesia. Continuous Spinal Anesthesia (CSA) offers hemodynamic stability and unlimited time under anesthesia by use of intermittent boluses or by pump infusion. The aim of the study is to compare the two techniques.

A retrospective study was conducted in patients undergoing ThuLEP between January 2023 and March 2024. Patients were divided into two groups CSA-B, (N =12) and CSA-I, (N=8) who received intermittent boluses or pump infusion. The average age of the patients was 70 years, ASA class (II - IV). Intralong CSA catheter (Pajunk, GmbH) 25, 27 G was placed at L3-L4, L2-L3. In both groups an initial dose of 1 to 1.7 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was administered, followed by boluses of 0.3 - 0.5 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine in CSA-B or anesthetic infusion with 0.7 to 1.0 ml/hour in CSA-I. Some patients were also sedated.

A significant difference was found in the duration of anesthesia (p=0.0365) and a non-significant difference in the total amount of local anesthetic (p=0.06) and hemodynamic complications (p=0.47) in both groups. Correlations between complications - duration and complications - total amount of anesthetic are inverse. The dose-duration correlation is directly proportional.

CSA provides hemodynamic stability through both techniques of anesthetic administration in patients undergoing ThuLEP. Тhe infusion technique is preferred for a longer procedure.
Vladimir RADEV (Pleven, Bulgaria), Daniela ARABADZHIEVA
10:15 - 10:20 #42694 - EP202 Improving rib fracture care at a district general hospital.
EP202 Improving rib fracture care at a district general hospital.

Blunt thoracic trauma accounts for 10-15% of trauma admissions in the UK, with rib fractures complicating two-thirds of cases. Non-operative management is common in district general hospitals, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to ensure healing and prevent complications. We aimed to evaluate rib fracture management practices at Lister Hospital and identify areas for improvement.

We retrospectively reviewed electronic records of patients admitted with "rib fractures" over a 5-month period (15/09/2022 – 17/02/2023, Cohort 1). Findings were used to develop a rib fracture pathway, which was implemented and reassessed over a 6-month period (01/09/2023 – 29/02/2024, Cohort 2).

Rib fracture admissions occurred every 2-3 days (118 patients), average hospital stay of 12 days. Easter scores increased from 7.8 (1-17) to 11.1 (4-27), indicating increased tendency to non-operative management. Timely referrals to pain teams were made (>80% of cases), but analgesia optimisation was needed in 22-35% of patients. Time to anesthetist review averaged 11.6 hours (range <30 minutes to 48 hours). Use of regional analgesia techniques increased from 30% to 62%, with decrease in epidural rates (45% to 15%), increase in paravertebral (36% to 65%) and erector spinae plane infusions (9% to 19%). Rates of PCA (morphine/fentanyl/oxycodone) were 22%. Critical care admissions decreased from 7% to 4%.

Key improvement areas include multidisciplinary teamwork and analgesia management. All patients were reviewed by physiotherapists but a significant proportion were not prescribed appropriate analgesia. The use of regional anaesthetic techniques increased. However, these skills still lie with a relatively restricted group, resulting in long waiting times.
Aalisha Mariam KARIMI, Sue YAN (Stevenage, United Kingdom), Mariam IMAM, Sachin NAVARANGE
10:20 - 10:25 #42862 - EP203 Acupuncture as an adjuvant to epidural infiltration for low back pain.
EP203 Acupuncture as an adjuvant to epidural infiltration for low back pain.

Low back pain,is one of the more spread disease in the world,specially in elderly people with comorbidity.The aim of this article is to show the effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjuvant to the classic epidural infiltration.Because elderly patients have coronary disease,hypertension,diabetis and dislypidemia,it was better to associate acupuncture and not NSAID or analgesic or antidepressant 0r neuropathic drugs that all have some abuse to the elderly ill patient

We took a 20 elder patients aged more 65 years old half of them female with at least two diseases of:coronary artery disease,hypertension,diabetis second type,dyslipidemia.After having the result of the IRM,the patients received an epidural infiltration with depomedrol(methylprednisolone) 1mg/kg between the levels L2-L3,or L3-L4, or L4-L5, or L5-S1.Also they received twice in the week an acupuncture session with moxibustion with or without neurostimulation for one month for low back pain in the acupoints:EX-B2,BL-23,2425,26,54,57,13,GB-30,32,34,39,GI-4.Those whose hacing aspirine,they stopped 5 days before the process

16 of the patients after one month had a relief of 80% of their low back pain and they were pleased with the outcome,the other 4 patients had a second epidural infiltration with methylprednisolone and their pain was relieved also about 80%

Acupuncture as an adjuvant in the therapy of low back pain by epidural infiltration in elderly ill patients with comorbidity could help in relieving pain instead traditional drugs that might abuse these patients
Walid KAMAL (Beyrouth, Lebanon)
10:25 - 10:30 #40885 - EP014 A Prospective, Randomized Dose-Finding Study of Intrathecal Morphine and Hydromorphone for Analgesia after Colorectal Surgery.
A Prospective, Randomized Dose-Finding Study of Intrathecal Morphine and Hydromorphone for Analgesia after Colorectal Surgery.

Intrathecal opioids confer superior postoperative analgesia to systemic opioids as they deliver analgesia directly to their site of action while curtailing the undesired side effects. The present study aimed to determine the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

The study was a double-blinded prospective trial and was approved by the ethics committee (IRB 20-009205). Patient were randomized into intrathecal morphine or hydromorphone group and dosing was determined by a sequential up-down method using a biased coin design. The primary outcome was ED90 of both agents to achieve numeric rating pain scores (NRS) ≤4 with postoperative opioid requirements ≤15 oral morphine equivalent at 12 hours.

Eighty patients completed the study. The ED90 for intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone could not be determined for the examined dose ranges (25-400 mcg and 10-200 mcg, respectively). The ED50 for morphine was 100 mcg (95% CI was below the lowest dose) and for hydromorphone was 75 mcg (95% CI 50–200 mcg). Morphine median (interquartile range, IQR) NRS scores was 3.0 (1.5-4.5) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-4.0) at 24 hours, whereas hydromorphone median (IQR) NRS were 3.0 (1.5-5.0) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-5.0) at 24 hours.

The study could not establish an ED90 for IT dosing for minimally invasive colorectal surgical patients. However, we did determine the ED50 for both agents. Patients reported to be very satisfied in their postoperative analgesic regimen in all dosing categories and no serious adverse events were observed throughout the study duration.
Josef PLETICHA (Austin, USA), Patrice VINSARD, Emily SHARPE, Jason PANCHAMIA, David OLSEN, Hans SVIGGUM, Sherief SHAWKI, Kevin BEHM

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S5
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 5

Chairperson: Andrea SAPORITO (Medical Director) (Chairperson, Bellinzona, Switzerland)
10:00 - 10:05 #42811 - EP196 Virtual reality game for managing burn pain in children: a randomized feasibility clinical study.
EP196 Virtual reality game for managing burn pain in children: a randomized feasibility clinical study.

Gaming in virtual reality (VR) is regarded as a secure and efficient substitute for traditional pain management techniques. The usefulness and practicability of a VR game for frequent burn dressing changes were examined in our study.

A randomized clinical trial was conducted among burned children hospitalized in the pediatric surgery department. We included burned children aged 4 to 12 years requiring daily dressing changes for at least 10 days a week. . One group played an interactive VR game during the dressing change, while children in the other group had a dressing change every other day while sedated with Ketamine and Propofol for 10 days. Perceived pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 for both groups and the satisfaction of parents and care givers was also assessed.

18 children were recruited for this study. The majority were male (2/1 ratio) with second-degree burns (91.4%). Children and caregivers in the VR group reported less pain from the 4th dressing change onwards. Children in the VR group reported a clinically significant (≥23%) reduction in overall pain, and the caregiver described no incidents or difficulties with dressing changes compared to subjects in the control group. Parent satisfaction with VR remained at high level during dressing changes over the 1-week period, with reported realism and engagement increasing over time. More than half of the children (54.5%) enjoyed playing the game and no difficulties.

VR should be considered as a nonpharmacologic companion for pain management during burn dressing changes
Sawsen CHAKROUN, Maha BEN MANSOUR (Monastir, Tunisia), Ben Fredj MYRIAM, Sabrine BEN YOUSSEF, Mtir MOHAMED KAMEL, Ben Saad NESRINE, Mandhouj OUMAYMA, Mosbahi SANA
10:05 - 10:10 #42664 - EP194 Journey of Liposomal Bupivacaine at a District General Hospital in NHS UK.
EP194 Journey of Liposomal Bupivacaine at a District General Hospital in NHS UK.

Multimodal analgesia is effective way to treat postsurgical pain. Routine Opiate use for acute pain management leads to delayed discharge and for enhanced recovery we need to reserve opiates for rescue analgesia. Liposomal Bupivacaine prolongs efficacy and duration of action and helps achieve Drink Rest Eat Analgesia Mobilise (DREAM) recovery post knee replacement . FDA license for Single-dose infiltration was given in 2011 and subsequently for Brachial plexus block , fascial plane, post surgical wound infiltration. In 2023 FDA approved Liposomal Bupivacaine for adductor canal block and sciatic nerve block.

Data collected from 20 patients who underwent Total knee replacement ( TKR ) with 20 mls 266 (mg ) Liposomal Bupivacaine injcted under USG guidance for nerve infiltration in Adductor canal and IPACK ( Posterior capsule) compared with 20 patients who underwent TKR with standard technique of plain Bupivacaine local infiltration .Both sets of Patients were also given central neuraxial blockade with 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 2.5 mls. A reduction in cumulative pain scores and opiate consumption postoperatively were end points.

Treatment with Liposomal Bupivacaine met the primary endpoint demonstrating significant 0 to 96 hours compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride (P <.01). Moreover,it was associated with a statistically significant reduction in postsurgical opioid consumption through 96 hours (P <.01). Statistical significance was achieved for the percentage of opioid-free patients who received Liposomal bupivacaine as a Adductor canal block through 96 hours (P <.01).

Peripheral nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine provides superior analgesia to local infiltration. Enhanced recovery DREAM fulfiled by Liposomal Bupivacaine.
Vikas GULIA (Nuneaton, United Kingdom), Kausik DASGUPTA
10:10 - 10:15 #42703 - EP195 Comparison of the Anesthetic and Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Dexamethasone Use in Femoral and Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks in Ankle Surgery.
EP195 Comparison of the Anesthetic and Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Dexamethasone Use in Femoral and Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks in Ankle Surgery.

Peripheral nerve block applications are frequently preferred in ankle surgery. It has been shown that the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant provides longer analgesia and less postoperative analgesic use (1,2). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding lower extremity surgery (1). The aim of our study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of adding dexamethasone as an adjuvant in lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks.

Patients were divided into two groups. Using USG-guided nerve demonstration and a 22 G 100 mm needle, the first group (Group D) received a femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block using 19 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine+1 ml of 4 mg dexamethasone solution. The other group (Group B) received a femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block using 19 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine+1 ml of 0.9% saline solution. The time to the first analgesic requirement, total analgesic usage in the first 24 hours, and VAS (visual analog scale) values in the first 24 hours were compared.

The amount of analgesic used in the first 24 hours was significantly lower in the group that used dexamethasone (Table 1). When the dynamic and resting VAS values at 6., 12., and 24. hours were examined, the VAS values were lower in the group that used dexamethasone (Table 2).

In peripheral nerve blocks applied using dexamethasone, less analgesic use and lower VAS values were observed. Consequently, we believe that the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant in femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block applications provides a more effective analgesic effect.
Dondu GENC MORALAR (Istanbul, Turkey), Talha AKDENIZ, Serpil SEHIRLIOĞLU
10:15 - 10:20 #42821 - EP197 ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF SACRAL ERECTOR SPİNAE BLOCK IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING PSARP (POSTERİOR SAGİTTAL ANORECTOPLASTY) SURGERİES: A CASE SERIES.
EP197 ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF SACRAL ERECTOR SPİNAE BLOCK IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING PSARP (POSTERİOR SAGİTTAL ANORECTOPLASTY) SURGERİES: A CASE SERIES.

PSARP (Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty) surgery is a surgical procedure performed in children to correct anorectal malformations. After this surgical intervention, pain management is very important for children. Reports have emerged of rare cases of sacral erector spinae block (SESB). In the hypospadias operation, Aksu and Gürkan successfully performed SESB for postoperative analgesia.

This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent PSARP surgery at a tertiary university hospital between 2019 and 2023, and underwent SESB for postoperative analgesia. We administered propofol (2mg/kg) , remifentanil (1 mcg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) in anesthesia to the approved patients and operated on them in the pron position after entubation. After surgery, we administered 15 ml/kg of paracetamol intravenously to all patients. We recorded post-operative Flacc scores, analgesic consumption, and complications.

The scanning of anesthesia and pain follow-up forms revealed that 17 patients had undergone PSARP surgery. We observed ultrasound-guided SESB in 14 patients, 9 girls and 5 males, using 0.2% bupivacaine at 1 ml/kg. The average age of the patients was 20.64 ± 8.67 months, and their average weight was 12.14 ± 2.21 kilograms. Four patients received paracetamol intravenously at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours after surgery. No patient should use opioids within 24 hours. Flacc scores remained low for 24 hours. (Table1)(Figure 1) There were no complications.

In anorectal surgeries, SESB may provide effective postoperative analgesia.
Gözen ÖKSÜZ (Kahramanmaraş, Turkey), Gökçe GİŞİ, Mahmut ARSLAN, Feyza ÇALIŞIR
10:20 - 10:25 #42865 - EP198 Modelling fascial plane blocks in Hele-Shaw cells: testable fluid mechanic hypothesis to improve these blocks.
EP198 Modelling fascial plane blocks in Hele-Shaw cells: testable fluid mechanic hypothesis to improve these blocks.

Apart from sub-Tenon's blocks fascial plane blocks do not achieve sufficiently reliable analgesia to be used as stand alone surgical regional anaesthesia. In theory, this is due to insufficient filling of fascial compartments. A misconception of the fluid mechanics relying on fast-injection bulk flow and diffusion instead of accounting for porosity, viscosity and slow creeping flow (viscous fingering) in compartments with extensive 2D but small height extension

Plane (n=5) and spherical (n=5) Hele-shaw cells with glycerol as highly viscous fascial sheath simulation betweeen solid phase and cling film. Single and triple outlet cannula used to breach cling film and inject 5 ml NaCL-solution over 30 seconds.

Slow injection induced viscous fingering with central zones of high flow and peripheral zones of fingering progression front slow flow instead of concentric extension of sodium solution. This "fractal" propagation front filled the 20cm x 13 cm compartment to a great extent and gave way to diffusion after cessation of injection. The same applied to spherical models. Fast injection favored bulk flow.

Viscous fingering may arise in slow-injection fascial block that maintain small height of the compartment. Given fluid mechanic determinants like porosity, viscosity ratio between LA and fascial sheath content and control of turbulence during injection, slow creeping flow inducing viscous fingering may fill fascial sheath compartments to a greater extent. These flow patterns need to be assessed in cadaver and volunteer studies, using MRI or 3 D ultrasound reconstructions and may favor slow injection/catheter techniques in fascial plane blocks.
Friedrich LERSCH (Berne, Switzerland), Dominik OBRIST, Yannick ROESCH
10:25 - 10:30 #41274 - EP193 Safety and effectiveness of ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block on pediatric patients in a tertiary orthopedic hospital.
EP193 Safety and effectiveness of ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block on pediatric patients in a tertiary orthopedic hospital.

For over forty years, anesthesiologists of the institution have safely practiced the trans-arterial axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) with intermediate-acting local anesthetic for forearm and elbow surgeries of pediatric patients. Recently, cases of neglected and complicated fractures with long operative times were encountered more frequently. This has rendered the duration of previous technique inadequate and has led to cases of unplanned conversion to general anesthesia. Technological advances in the latter years have enabled practitioners to administer long-acting local anesthestic for ABPB under ultrasound guidance. This study presents the outcomes of ultrasound-guided ABPB on pediatric patients in a tertiary orthopedic hospital.

With the approval of Institutional Ethics Review Board, investigators reviewed the chart of patients aged 8-17 years old who underwent forearm and elbow surgery under ultrasound-guided ABPB using isobaric bupivacaine +/- lidocaine and adjuncts for the period of June-October 2022. Outcomes were described.

Forty five patients were included with an average age of 13.76 years, predominantly male (73.33%), majority classified as ASA I (88.89%). Average onset time was 26.44 minutes, with a mean duration of 15.87 and 19.91 hours for motor and sensory block, respectively. Eight patients (17.78%) required rescue medication for post-operative pain, while the majority (82.22%) did not. Long-acting local anesthetic was safely administered without adverse events. Vital signs remained stable.

Ultrasound-guided ABPB provided safe motor and sensory block with adequate duration for pediatric patients aged 8-17 years old who underwent upper extremity surgery, supporting its effectiveness in achieving anesthesia and post-operative pain control.
Kelvin OPIÑA, Erwin RODENAS (Manila, Philippines), Marco Perikar DIMAANO, Maria Rhodelia VINLUAN

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S4
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 4

Chairperson: Livija SAKIC (anaesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Zagreb, Croatia)
10:00 - 10:05 #42463 - EP187 Peripheral Superior Cluneal Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Low Back Pain: A Case Series.
EP187 Peripheral Superior Cluneal Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Low Back Pain: A Case Series.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can be challenging to treat, with superior cluneal neuralgia (SCN) often overlooked as a potential cause. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has emerged as a promising therapy for CLBP, including SCN. This case series presents the outcomes of six patients with SCN treated with temporary PNS.

Retrospective analysis of six patients implanted with the Micro Lead -SPRINT PNS System. Data included pain scores, opioid use, complications, and outcomes.

Patients experienced chronic SCN pain for a mean duration of 18 months before PNS. Various treatments were unsuccessful. PNS resulted in significant pain relief and functional improvement at 6 months follow-up. However, at the 2-year follow-up, it was challenging to contact the patients, given inconclusive results.

SCN entrapment is often overlooked as a cause of low back pain. Diagnosis requires a detailed history and physical exam. PNS has shown effectiveness in managing chronic pain conditions and provides an alternative when conservative treatments fail. PNS can be effective in managing SCN, leading to significant reductions in pain intensity and improvements in functional status. However, further research is needed to better understand the optimal patient selection criteria, long-term efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PNS compared to other treatment modalities.
Nicolas MAS D ALESSANDRO, Faria NISAR, Hesham ELSHARKAWY (Cleveland, USA)
10:05 - 10:10 #42700 - EP188 Infection control measures for peripheral nerve blocks: a survey of practice.
EP188 Infection control measures for peripheral nerve blocks: a survey of practice.

There is limited national guidance available on infection control measures for peripheral nerve blocks. We were aware of some variation in practice and conducted a survey to establish if local guidance should be developed.

A survey was generated using Microsoft Forms and circulated around our department via email. Respondents indicated their standard practice for single shot peripheral nerve blocks. There were 4 questions covering use of gloves, probe coverings, skin disinfectant and gel. Each question had a range of preset answers. All responses were anonymised.

A total of 38 responses were received (54% response rate). Results are detailed in Table 1 (preset answers without any responses were omitted). The majority of respondents use sterile gloves and probe covers (87%). The most commonly used skin disinfectant is 2% Chlorhexidine (76%). All respondents use individual sachets of gel rather than multidose dispensers.

Higher concentration (2%) Chlorhexidine is non superior to lower concentration (0.5%) preparations at reducing risk of infection and has a higher theoretical risk of neurotoxicity. The 2% Chlorhexidine also has a greater financial and environmental cost due to its integrated single use applicator. Whilst there are limitations with self-reported data, the survey demonstrates a relatively consistent approach to other infection control measures amongst our department. The results of this survey have been shared with the department. Local guidance is being developed to promote use of 0.5% Chlorhexidine for peripheral nerve blocks. We plan to audit practice in due course. National guidance would be welcomed to help further standardise practice.
Dr Iain MACTIER, Dr Katherine MAGUIRE (Larbert, United Kingdom)
10:10 - 10:15 #42754 - EP189 Neurostimulator implantation as an approach in the management of chronic pain in a patient with an arteriovenous malformation.
EP189 Neurostimulator implantation as an approach in the management of chronic pain in a patient with an arteriovenous malformation.

Chronic pain caused by lack of blood flow is known as ischemic pain. Neurostimulation by causing a decrease of sympathetic output reduces vasoconstriction and improves blood flow. Parasympathetic stimulation has also been implicated in improving circulation in the extremities by causing arteriolar dilatation. We described a case of chronic pain and calcaneus skin ulcer due to an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the left calcaneus, resistant to surgical treatment and pulsed radiofrequency. The 53-year-old female presented with pain associated to heat sensation, pruritus, and allodynia in the left heel. The patient underwent endovascular embolization without relief. Pulsed radiofrequency and analgesic block of the left posterior tibial nerve provided temporary relief.

The implantation of a neurostimulator electrode parallel to the left posterior tibial nerve, next to the internal malleolus, under ultrasound guidance occurred without complications.

The interventions resulted in significant pain relief, with the maximum visual analog scale (VAS) decreasing from 8/9 to 1 with four hours of neurostimulation daily. The calcaneus skin ulcer underwent excellent evolution as shown in figure 1.

This case underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing pain and cutaneous manifestations related to AVMs. Neurostimulation’s emerge as effective therapeutic options for AVMs neuropathic chronic pain, offering promising outcomes for patients resistant to conventional treatments.
Diogo FERREIRA, Mariana PASCOAL (Coimbra, Portugal), Germano CARREIRA
10:15 - 10:20 #42768 - EP190 Continuous peripheral nerve block: a retrospective analysis on efficacy and complications.
EP190 Continuous peripheral nerve block: a retrospective analysis on efficacy and complications.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide prolonged postoperative analgesia. However, there are concerns about the high reported rates of block failure and catheter dislodgement. We analyzed the efficacy and incidence of block failure and catheter dislodgement in our clinical practice.

This retrospective study analyzed perioperative data up to the third postoperative day using electronic records of patients who received CPNB over a 7 months period in 2023. Data were collected and the following variables were analyzed: type of surgery, location of CPNB, details of insertion, sensory and motor block, opioid consumption, maximum Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, timing of catheter removal, incidence of catheter dislodgement and side effects.

A total of 137 CPNB were inserted: 72% interscalene, 12% popliteal, 9% costoclavicular, 4% femoral and 3% supraclavicular. Insertion-related issues were reported in 12% of the cases: technical difficulties (7%), catheter replacement for accidental removal (4%) or inadequate local anesthetic spread (1%). Efficacy of CPNB is shown in Table 1. The mean maximum NRS on days 0, 1, 2 and 3 were 1, 3, 2 and 3. Reported complications were: block failure and replacement (1%) and accidental dislodgement during the first 24 hours (4%). Side effects of interscalene catheters were: Horner syndrome (2%) and respiratory insufficiency (2%).

CPNB was effective to prolong the analgesia up to 3 days, although the opioid sparing effect tended to decrease over time. The reported complications, side effects and accidental dislodgement were lower than previously reported.
Walter STAELENS (Genk, Belgium), Leander MANCEL, William AERTS, Simon NJUGUNA, Fréderic POLUS, Sarah SHIBA, Ana LOPEZ GUTIÉRREZ, Imré VAN HERREWEGHE
10:20 - 10:25 #42809 - EP191 Evaluation of patient experience after peripheral regional anaesthesia in elective orthopaedic day case procedures.
EP191 Evaluation of patient experience after peripheral regional anaesthesia in elective orthopaedic day case procedures.

Pain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience”. Nowadays regional neuraxial blockade is commonly used, especially in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate patient experience post regional anaesthetic blockade in elective orthopaedic day case surgery.

Data was collected over a five-day period. Data collected included, grade of block performer, the block performed, technique used (landmark/ultrasound guided), injectate used, if the block was the sole anaesthetic technique or with a general anaesthetic, immediate post operative verbal pain score (0-10) and post operative analgesics required. Subsequently, patients were followed up 24 hours post-op to assess pain scores, time till recovery of motor function and overall patient satisfaction score (1-10). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

Over the five-day period data from 15 upper-limb blocks were recorded. 10 out the 15 blocks were axillary, four interscalene and one supraclavicular. Levobupivacaine 0.5% was the most common injectate used. Nine patients had a pain score of 0 (average 1.3). At the 24-hour follow-up pain scores varied quite significantly (average 3.25). Importantly, most patients felt they received poor information on what to expect post block. This led to delays in taking prescribed analgesia, anxiety regarding motor weakness and uncertainty when and where to seek help. However, overall satisfaction scores ranged between 7-10.

Poor patient education post peripheral block negatively impacted patients pain experience and may have led to worse pain scores. To tackle this specific post regional anaesthesia leaflets were introduced and given to all patients post-operatively.
Mustafa VAPRA, Gurmukh Das PUNSHI (Tullamore, Ireland, Ireland)
10:25 - 10:30 #42845 - EP192 THE IMPACT OF PRE-ANESTHESIC INFORMATION ON THE PERIOPERATIVE EXPERIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ANESTHESIA DEPARTMENT.
EP192 THE IMPACT OF PRE-ANESTHESIC INFORMATION ON THE PERIOPERATIVE EXPERIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ANESTHESIA DEPARTMENT.

The anesthesia consultation is a preparatory stage for the surgical act, during which pre-anesthetic information is necessarily delivered to the patients. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the impact of pre-anesthetic information on perioperative anxiety, and to compare the effect of each information mode on this anxiety and on the desire for information.

This is a monocentric, prospective, randomized study, conducted over a period of ten months from February 2023 to November 2023 in the anesthesia outpatient department at first, then in the various operating rooms and hospitalization.

This study showed a higher level of anxiety in the STANDARD group compared to the other two groups (72.8%). A level of anxiety adapted to the situation more frequently found for the BROCHURE group (19%). The VIDEO group had the lowest level of preoperative anxiety. The desire for information was high for the STANDARD group (70.6%) then in the BROCHURE group (54.9%), the VIDEO group (50%) had the lowest level of desire for information. The majority of patients in the VIDEO group (66.9%) were very satisfied with the anesthetic procedure (p= 10-3). Patients in the VIDEO group were the most satisfied with the anesthetic information provided (64.6%) unlike the STANDARD (36.8%) and BROCHURE (45.1%) groups (p= 10-3 ).

The management of perioperative anxiety is an important pillar in anesthetic management. Anesthetic information in the form of video may reduce the rate of this anxiety, with levels of satisfaction with anesthesia and pre-anesthetic information higher than the standard anesthetic information
Maha BEN MANSOUR, Ben Saad NESRINE (monastir, Tunisia), Mtir MOHAMED KAMEL, Bouksir KHALIL, Sakly HAYFA, Ben Fredj MYRIAM, Sabrine BEN YOUSSEF, Sawsen CHAKROUN

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S3
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 3

Chairperson: Ismet TOPCU (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, İzmir, Turkey)
10:00 - 10:05 #41234 - EP181 Quality of Post-Operative Analgesia of Paravertebral Blocks vs Thoracic Epidurals in Patients Undergoing VATS Lobectomies.
EP181 Quality of Post-Operative Analgesia of Paravertebral Blocks vs Thoracic Epidurals in Patients Undergoing VATS Lobectomies.

Inadequate pain management after VATS lobectomies has been associated with significant morbidity. Thoracic epidurals (TEAs) have classically been the primary modality for post-operative analgesia. However, they are not without significant complications. We investigated if paravertebral blocks (PVBs) provide non-inferior postoperative analgesia while diminishing patients' risk of analgesia-related complications.

We performed an anonymized prospective chart review of 165 patients undergoing VATS lobectomies with a PVB or a TEA at Vancouver General Hospital with local health authority approval. Postoperative pain scores at rest and with activity, and total opioid consumption, were recorded in the PACU, and on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. The frequency of hemodynamic and respiratory complications, Foley catheterization, nausea, pruritus, and drowsiness were recorded at the same time intervals. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

65 patients received a PVB and 100 patients received a TEA, and the groups did not differ significantly for any studied demographic variable. We did not identify any points in patients’ post-operative courses where pain, at rest and with activity, and total opioid consumption differed significantly between the two patient cohorts. Patients who received TEAs had more complications than those with PVBs, with the greatest differences found in the incidence of hemodynamic complications, pruritis, and Foley catheterization.

PVBs offer non-inferior analgesia while providing a reduced incidence of analgesia-related complications relative to TEAs in patients undergoing VATS lobectomies. PVBs should thus be considered as an effective analgesic alternative to TEAs in these patients.
Alexa CALDWELL (VANCOUVER, Canada), Christopher DURKIN, Travis SCHISLER, Anna MCGUIRE
10:05 - 10:10 #41507 - EP182 Caffeine for the treatment of post-puncture headache can provoke a convulsive attack.
EP182 Caffeine for the treatment of post-puncture headache can provoke a convulsive attack.

Along with the classic triad of preeclampsia (PE) - edema, proteinuria, hypertension, many clinicians have used hyperuricemia (HU) as indicator of PE.

We examined 33 patients with preeclampsia, from whom, in addition to the standard clinical and laboratory examination, venous blood was collected and cerebrospinal fluid was collected during spinal anesthesia. Their parameters were compared with those of 55 practically healthy pregnant women - without background pathology and/or pathology of pregnancy; laboratory parameters and neurological status of which were assessed quantitatively at least three times - upon admission, on the 3-4th and 7-10th days of treatment. In all patients, along with generally accepted clinical, instrumental and laboratory tests, spectrophotometric determination of the concentrations of adenine, guanine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, uric acid (UA), and malondialdehyde was carried out in samples of cerebrospinal fluid and venous blood.

It has been established that there is a clinical and pathobiochemical relationship between HU and eclamptic convulsive seizures: “strong” HU - above 420 μmol/l - is the most pronounced unfavorable metabolic marker, predictor and, possibly, a direct factor in the transformation of preeclampsia into convulsive eclampsia. High levels of oxypurines in the cerebrospinal fluid are also an unfavorable prognostic sign for patients with preeclampsia.

1. “Strong” hyperuricemia and critically elevated levels of other oxypurines in patients with preeclampsia both in the blood serum and in the cerebrospinal fluid - is a prognostically reliable predictor of the transformation of even mild preeclampsia into convulsive eclampsia. 2.Caffeine and other methylxanthines may be proconvulsants in women with preeclampsia.
Evgeny ORESHNIKOV (Cheboksary, Russia), Elvira VASILJEVA, Denisova TAMARA, Svetlana ORESHNIKOVA, Alexander ORESHNIKOV
10:10 - 10:15 #42564 - EP183 Combined superficial and intermediate cervical plexus block for focused parathyroidectomy.
EP183 Combined superficial and intermediate cervical plexus block for focused parathyroidectomy.

Focused Parathyroidectomy is usually performed under general anaesthesia. Cervical plexus block as a sole anaesthesia for parathyroidectomy has been rarely used. In this case series, we describe application of combined superficial and intermediate cervical plexus (ICPB)block in two high risk patients scheduled for focused parathyroidectomy.

First case fifty year old male with hyperparathyroidism ,motor neuron disease and inflammatory polyarthritis, on examination he had dysarthria, tongue fasciculations, absent gag reflex and poor effort tolerance. Second case was a forty year old female with hyperparathyroidism, hypertension, recurrent renal stones and recent history of recovery from typhoid fever. Due to high risk of prolong post operative mechanical ventilation in first case and in view of recent history of typhoid fever in second case regional anaesthesia was planned in these two cases. At the midpoint of sternocleidomastoid(SCM)),ultrasound guided ICPB was given with 8 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine(Fig-1).Through same entry point needle 8 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was deposited to give a single point subcutaneous superficial cervical plexus block(Fig-2). Block was repeated on the other side as well.

In both the two cases, cervical plexus block provided excellent surgical condition with good postoperative pain relief.

Superficial and intermediate cervical plexus block can be considered as a sole anaesthesia technique for focused parathyroidectomy as it provide prolonged postoperative analgesia, reduce the requirements for opioid analgesics and early discharge after surgery.
Parin LALWANI (Delhi, India), Abhishek NAGARAJAPPA, Swati MEHTA, Puneet KHANNA
10:15 - 10:20 #42599 - EP184 PROTOCOL FOR INTRATHECAL MORPHINE TRIAL USING PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA.
EP184 PROTOCOL FOR INTRATHECAL MORPHINE TRIAL USING PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA.

Intrathecal opioid therapy is indicated for various types of pain. Prior to the implantation of a programmable pump, a trial test is required. There is no consensus on the best method for conducting trial. We present a patient combining basal infusion of morphine with boluses using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

45-year-old severe traumatic injury in right lower limb 15 years ago, 30 surgeries including supracondylar amputation. Neuropathic pain in the stump and severe nonspecific lumbosacral pain. Multiple previous treatments: nerve blocks, rehabilitation, prolotherapy, high-dose methadone and adjuvants, infusions of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine. Multiple hospital admissions. Placement of an epidural catheter with fentanyl and bupivacaine infusion provided relief. It was decided to perform an intrathecal morphine trial.

Day1: Intrathecal catheter placed at T8. Initial bolus of 0.2mg of morphine sulfate (1mg/mL), and the PCA pump was programmed with a 10-hour lockout period. Then 0.1mg morphine boluses was programmed with a lockout period of 4 hours. The patient used 3 boluses. Day2: Continuous infusion was programmed with the total dose used on the previous day (0.5mg),boluses of 0.1mg with a 4-hour lockout period. The patient used 5 boluses, achieving VAS 2 only mild difficult to start urination was detected. Day3: Continuous infusion of 1mg over 24 hours was administered, imitating the definitive pump. Excellent response was maintained. The catheter was removed and implantation of an intrathecal pump was programmed.

PCA imitates the functioning of the definitive implantable pump and is a satisfactory method for conducting the intrathecal morphine trial.
Federico SALLE, Renzo GARCIA, Natalia BERNARDI, Ana BENTANCOR, Ana SCHWARTZMANN BRUNO (Montevideo, Uruguay), Martha SURBANO
10:20 - 10:25 #42618 - EP185 Regional Anaesthesia for Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: What is Our Current Practice.
EP185 Regional Anaesthesia for Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: What is Our Current Practice.

Pain management after head and neck cancer free flap reconstruction is complicated by the different sites of surgery; the primary cancer site and the donor flap site. Perioperative analgesia has moved towards multi-modal analgesia (MMA) and this technique has been endorsed by the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia (1). Although the primary cancer site is not conducive to conventional regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques, the donor flap site is often harvested from peripheral limbs and RA can play a key component of MMA. The aim of this report is to describe our current intraoperative analgesic regimes for patients undergoing free flap (FF) reconstruction for head and neck cancer surgery.

This is a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing elective head and neck FF reconstructive surgery over an 8 month period (September 2023-April 2024) at a tertiary hospital (50-60 cases/year). Patients who underwent rescue FF or regional flaps were excluded.

28 patients received FF reconstruction surgery with 29 flaps (table 1). All patients received MMA adjuncts in combination with opioids, with a significant proportion of patients receiving RA after flap harvesting (table 2). The commonest RA technique performed targeted the femoral nerve, reflecting the most frequent flap harvested (ALT), with popliteal blocks used for fibula flaps (chart 1).

At our centre we demonstrated a high level of MMA, including RA, for patients undergoing head and neck cancer FF reconstruction. We advocate that “Plan A” blocks can be used as part of MMA to reduce perioperative opioids and their associated side-effects.
Franklin WOU (East Grinstead, United Kingdom), Alison CHALMERS
10:25 - 10:30 #42850 - EP186 Communication in obstetrical care team.
EP186 Communication in obstetrical care team.

The provision of care by the medical team must have an immediate and positive impact on the health and safety of patients. It is increasingly important to rely on cooperative teams in the healthcare field due to the rising complexity and specialization of care and the general labor shortage. Aim:To study the pillars of communication and collaboration between anesthesiologists and paramedical staff using the example of the maternity ward and to identify the causes of poor communication among the obstetric care team.

This is a survey using two questionnaires: the first addressed to midwives and the second to anesthesia technicians working in level III maternity wards. It is a descriptive study conducted within the obstetrical units (delivery room and operating room) of four Tunisian university hospitals

Seventy-three midwives and sixty-eight anesthesia technicians responded to our questionnaires. The relationship with the anesthesiologist was satisfactory in 67.9% and 72.9% of cases, respectively. The two main causes of poor communication were workload and lack of organization in over 60% of cases. The implementation of a service protocol guiding the call of the anesthesiologist in critical situations improved communication among the different stakeholders and significantly reduced the response time to calls (p=0.034). The proposed suggestion was basic training for all healthcare personnel on communication through high-fidelity simulation sessions.

Our study suggests that midwives and technicians do not have sufficient knowledge of their scope of practice, and that workload and lack of organization are the major causes of poor communication.
Sakly HAYFA, Maha BEN MANSOUR (Monastir, Tunisia), Ben Fredj MYRIAM, Ben Saad NESRINE, Mandhouj OUMAYMA, Haj Salem RATHIA, Bouksir KHALIL, Mtir MOHAMED KAMEL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
EP05S1
10:00 - 10:30

ePOSTER Session 5 - Station 1

Chairperson: Marcus NEUMUELLER (Senior Consultant) (Chairperson, Steyr, Austria)
10:00 - 10:05 #40319 - EP169 Determining the adequacy of anesthesia by using a laryngeal mask airway during thyroidectomy.
EP169 Determining the adequacy of anesthesia by using a laryngeal mask airway during thyroidectomy.

The results of using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to ensure airway patency during thyroidectomy are satisfactory.

Prospective randomized clinical trials were conducted in 96 patients operated on for nodal euthyroid goiter (patient’s informed consent have been obtained). Induction was carried out by bolus intravenous administration of fentanyl ), midazem and propofol . LMA was established after induction in spontaneous breathing. Administration of propofol continued as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 5 -7 mg/kg/hour until the end of the surgery. The adequacy of anesthesia was assessed by clinical observation, by studying the variables of the standard monitoring (ECG, heart rate, BP,SpO2), BIS monitoring, acid base balance (ABB) and arterial blood gas (ABG) composition and the level of cortisol in the venous blood.

Clinical observation showed the adequacy of anesthesia. After induction, fluctuations in peripheral circulation were not pronounced, since LMA administration is not traumatic. The surgical stage of anesthesia was achieved quickly, with a smooth course and hemodynamic stability without respiratory depression. The depth of anesthesia was easily controlled by a change in the dose of propofol drip. All quantitative indicators of standard monitoring (BP, heart rate, SpO2), ABG composition and cortisol level in venous blood were change in statistically acceptable range. LMA was removed after the completion of the surgical intervention with adequate spontaneous breathing. Complications associated with the use of LMA were not observed.

Anesthesia with the use of LMA with preserved spontaneous breathing is an adequate method of anesthesia in thyroid surgery.
Aynur ISAYEVA, Nizami MURADOV, Mahrux ABBASOVA, Gunay MIRZEYEVA, (Baku, Azerbaijan), Shahla ALEKBEROVA
10:05 - 10:10 #41130 - EP170 The Effectiveness of Subanesthetic Intravenous Ketamine for Relief of Tourniquet Pain in Adult Patients for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery at a Tertiary Care Center from June 2021 to May 2023: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
EP170 The Effectiveness of Subanesthetic Intravenous Ketamine for Relief of Tourniquet Pain in Adult Patients for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery at a Tertiary Care Center from June 2021 to May 2023: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tourniquet use in orthopedic surgeries aids in creating a bloodless surgical field but can lead to complications, notably pain. This study primarily aimed to assess the effectiveness of subanesthetic ketamine in preventing tourniquet-induced hemodynamic responses during arthroscopic knee surgery of adult patients.

This was a retrospective, analytical, observational, cohort type of an epidemiological study conducted at a tertiary care center from March 2023 to November 2023. Forty five adult patients who had arthroscopic surgery of the knee were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of subanesthetic intravenous ketamine for tourniquet pain relief, 21 had received ketamine and 24 did not. The endpoints of this study were changes in the vital signs (systolic blood pressure and heart rate) and use of intraoperative fentanyl.

There was a significant decrease in the heart rate of ketamine group at the 45 and 60-minute intervals. In contrast, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements did not show noticeable disparities among the groups at most time points, indicating that ketamine's impact on blood pressure was minimal. The overall usage of intraoperative fentanyl was low in both groups, with a minor increase observed in the non-ketamine group in the later stages of surgery. However, this observed pattern did not achieve statistical significance.

A subanesthetic intravenous ketamine dose contributes to a significant reduction in the heart rate during arthroscopic knee surgery, without substantially impacting blood pressure or the need for additional opioid such as the fentanyl.
Emanuela FLORES (Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, Philippines), Aileen ROSALES, Noel AYPA
10:10 - 10:15 #41237 - EP171 Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain in Wounded Military Personnel through Prolonged Peripheral Nerve Blockade: A Comprehensive Approach.
EP171 Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain in Wounded Military Personnel through Prolonged Peripheral Nerve Blockade: A Comprehensive Approach.

Phantom limb pain (PLP) remains a challenging condition that is common after limb amputation and has a high prevalence among wounded military personnel. This study evaluates a comprehensive approach that combines long-term peripheral nerve blocks with systemic pharmacologic interventions to address this complex phenomenon.

A randomized trial design was adopted to evaluate the efficacy of two primary treatment modalities: Method 1, consisting of regional anesthesia applied twice at 72-hour intervals, supplemented by fentanyl patch applications; and Method 2, involving prolonged perineural blockade via intraneural catheters over six days. Participants included wounded military personnel experiencing PLP, with interventions tailored based on individual patient characteristics and the anatomical level of amputation.

The study included 26 participants, with 73.1% (n=19) undergoing Method 1 and 26.9% (n=7) receiving Method 2. Initial pain scores averaged at 7.1 ± 2.1 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with notable reductions observed post-treatment (3.2 ± 1.6 for Method 1 and 4.1 ± 2.6 for Method 2). Method 1 demonstrated superior efficacy in pain reduction and improvement in sleep quality compared to Method 2.

The integrated treatment approach, combining systemic pharmacotherapy with targeted regional anesthesia, significantly alleviates PLP in wounded military personnel, enhancing their quality of life. Method 1 showcased greater effectiveness, underscoring the importance of personalized and adaptable pain management strategies in military medical care. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment protocols and explore the long-term benefits of such integrative approaches.
Oleksii BABII, Vadym BABII (Ukraine, Ukraine)
10:15 - 10:20 #41254 - EP172 Virtual reality: Patient and Anaesthetist experience.
EP172 Virtual reality: Patient and Anaesthetist experience.

The prospect of “hearing and seeing everything” in the operating theatre can be a source of great anxiety and discomfort for the patient leading to dissatisfaction and possibly failure of the regional anaesthesia technique.(1) iPads have been shown to be an effective audio-visual distraction aid to minimise anxiety and improve patient satisfaction. (2) Our project reviews whether the use of a VR headset would as effective as using iPads during invasive procedures performed under regional anaesthesia.

Following informed consent, we prospectively collected feedback from 5 patients undergoing Orthopaedic surgery under regional anaesthesia with the virtual reality headset Oculus Quest 2. Feedback from the Anaesthetist was also recorded.

None of the respondents reported to being uncomfortable or anxious at any time. 1 respondent felt the headset to be heavy. All the respondents said they would recommend this to other patients. Challenges faced were unreliable hospital wifi, inability to manage case and setup when solo Anaesthetist on the list and difficulty to adjust the display settings particularly when the patient was lying flat.

Although bespoke medical VR solutions exist, they are expensive and limited in what distraction they provide. Here we used a consumer device and played youtube videos of the patient’s choice. Hence, more economical. We observed high satisfaction with audio-visual distraction using a VR headset, but technical challenges of the specific headset limited utility. A new headset, Quest 3 has now been released which we believe will overcome some of the technical challenges .
Rashmi REBELLO (Oxford, U.K, United Kingdom), Eoin KELLEHER, Vassilis ATHANASSOGLOU, Svetlana GALITZINE, Kyle PATTINSON
10:20 - 10:25 #42437 - EP173 Epidural blood-patch for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension due to meningeal diverticula: A case-report.
EP173 Epidural blood-patch for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension due to meningeal diverticula: A case-report.

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is an increasingly recognized condition. While SIH was rarely diagnosed in the past, it is now acknowledged as an important cause of headaches. Spinal dural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks cause SIH, and in 20% of cases, they are associated with a meningeal diverticulum in the region of the nerve root.

A 51-year-old, male patient, referred to neurology presenting with an 8-month long history of postural headache, tinnitus and vertigo, was admitted for diagnostic work-up and subsequently diagnosed with SIH. Magnetic resonance imaging showed signs of intracranial hypotension and several meningeal diverticula in the region of the nerve roots spanning from the lower cervical to the lower thoracic level (C7-T10) –see Figure 1. After ruling out overt leakage of CSF from other locations, a causal association between the meningeal diverticula and SIH was assumed.

Being non-responsive to previous conservative measures (bed rest, abundant oral hydration and caffeine 600mg/day), an epidural blood-patch (EBP) was requested to the anaesthesiology team. An EBP was performed at T9-T10 level with 20 ml of autologous blood, without complications.

The result was complete resolution of symptoms in a few hours, with asymptomatic ambulation and hospital discharge within 24 hours.
Luís MEIRA, Maria VIEIRA, Inês QUEIROZ (Porto, Portugal), Tiago FREITAS, Rui RABIÇO, Óscar CAMACHO
10:25 - 10:30 #42495 - EP174 Oncologic neuropathic pain in pediatric population, a narrative review of the literature.
EP174 Oncologic neuropathic pain in pediatric population, a narrative review of the literature.

Neuropathic pain (NP) arises from lesions or diseases affecting the somatosensory system, with increased neuronal activation and ectopic discharges. In pediatric oncology, may be due to chemotherapeutic agents, as structural, post-surgical lesions, phantom limb syndrome, autoimmune and degenerative neuropathic diseases. Diagnosis in children can be difficult due to the variety of symptoms and requires multiple therapeutic strategies for management. Treatment of NP in children follows similar principles to those in adults, but doses are usually moderate and rarely increased to the maximum for maximum effectiveness.

An independent review was carried out by the authors in the databases with a subsequent meeting, where the articles that were found were presented and a consensus was reached on the articles to be included. The objective of this article is to conduct a narrative review of the existing literature on the treatment of cancer-related neuropathic pain in pediatric population.

Thorough evaluation and effective pain control play pivotal roles in enhancing the well-being and health outcomes of this poblation. If initial treatments prove ineffective, interventional therapies should be accessible as alternative options. Different scientific societies advocate for employing a multimodal approach encompassing pharmacological, physical, and psychotherapeutic interventions, tailored to individual needs. The overarching objective should be to enhance the quality of life for the patient.

Neuropathic pain is frequently seen in pediatric cancer patients, but is often overlooked and inadequately treated with ineffective treatments. Treatment of neuropathic pain in this population involves a comprehensive evaluation along with the use of pharmacologic, interventional, and nonpharmacologic approaches.
Anamaria CAMARGO (Bucaramanga, Colombia), German William RANGEL, Karina ORTEGA, Karol CABEZA, Ximena CEDIEL
10:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A31
10:30 - 11:20

WORLD SISTER SOCIETIES MEETING

Keynote Speakers: Thang CONG QUYET (Senior lecturer) (Keynote Speaker, Hanoi, Vietnam), Juan Carlos DE LA CUADRA FONTAINE (Associate Clinical Professor/ Anesthesiologist/ LASRA President) (Keynote Speaker, Santiago, Chile), Ezzat SAMY AZIZ (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Cairo, Egypt)
Chairperson: Eleni MOKA (faculty) (Chairperson, Thessaloniki, Greece, Greece)
CONGRESS HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B41
10:30 - 11:20

ASK THE EXPERT
SCS for sicle cell disease and other rare indications

Chairperson: Steven COHEN (Professor) (Chairperson, Chicago, USA)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Steven COHEN (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Chicago, USA)
10:35 - 11:05 SCS for sickle cell disease. Magdalena ANITESCU (Professor of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Chicago, USA)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C33
10:30 - 11:20

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Role of predictive testing in pain interventions

Chairperson: Jan BLAHA (Head of the Department) (Chairperson, Praha 2, Czech Republic)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Jan BLAHA (Head of the Department) (Keynote Speaker, Praha 2, Czech Republic)
10:35 - 10:48 Diagnostic Medial Branch Block. David PROVENZANO (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Bridgeville, USA)
10:48 - 11:01 Trials of SCS. Maria Luz PADILLA DEL REY (Anesthesiologist and Pain Physician) (Keynote Speaker, MURCIA, Switzerland)
11:01 - 11:14 Intrathecal Drug Delivery. Denis DUPOIRON (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Angers, France)
11:14 - 11:20 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D33
10:30 - 11:20

ASK THE EXPERT
Human factors

Chairperson: Geert-Jan VAN GEFFEN (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, NIjmegen, The Netherlands)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Geert-Jan VAN GEFFEN (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, NIjmegen, The Netherlands)
10:35 - 11:05 Human factors in PNB (stop before you block, wrong drugs, wrong route). Morne WOLMARANS (Consultant Anaesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Norwich, United Kingdom)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E33
10:30 - 11:20

ASK THE EXPERT
Best options for minimal invasive thoracic surgery

Chairperson: Manoj KARMAKAR (Professor, Consultant, Director of Pediatric Anesthesia) (Chairperson, Shatin, Hong Kong)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Manoj KARMAKAR (Professor, Consultant, Director of Pediatric Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Shatin, Hong Kong)
10:35 - 11:05 Best options for minimal invasive thoracic surgery. Michael HERRICK (Faculty Member) (Keynote Speaker, Hanover, NH, USA)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F33
10:30 - 11:20

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
PNB for Cardiac Surgery

Chairperson: Marcus THUDIUM (Consultant anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Bonn, Germany)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Marcus THUDIUM (Consultant anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Bonn, Germany)
10:35 - 10:50 For cardiac surgery. Sina GRAPE (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Sion, Switzerland)
10:50 - 11:05 #43421 - F33 For thoracic surgery.
For thoracic surgery.

Introduction

Pain after thoracic surgery is of moderate-to-severe intensity and can cause increased postoperative distress and impair functional recovery. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have gained considerable attention in perioperative pain management as a method to reduce systemic opioid consumption and improve pain control. This narrative review aims to describe the different peripheral regional blocks in the context of thoracic surgery. PubMed and Embase were searched for all RCTs and reviews involving adult participants undergoing thoracic surgery with PNB as analgesia. A total of 157 articles were retrieved according to the search strategy in Pubmed and 234 in Embase. After screening of the title and abstract,92 articles (68 RCT,24 reviews) were selected finally. Regional anaesthesia is a useful choice in thoracic surgery and peripheral nerve block can improve patient outcomes. Due to the lack of RCTs, it is still not possible to determine the most appropriate block in individual surgical situations, although we have the PROSPECT recommendations.

Discussion

Intercostal nerve blocks are a relatively easy procedure to perform and can provide potent analgesia in a fast and reliable manner48. One advantage of intercostal blocks is that they can be performed under direct visualisation in the pleural cavity by the surgeon in the field or percutaneously by the anaesthetist. Due to the circumscribed nature of the intercostal nerves innervating the chest wall, multiple levels of injection are required to ensure adequate analgesia.

A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the administration of a single-injection ICNB among adults undergoing thoracic surgery was associated with a modest reduction in pain scores during the initial 24-hour postoperative period. Intercostal nerve block analgesia was superior to systemic opioid-based analgesia, noninferior to TEA, and marginally inferior to PVB. Because ICNB analgesia was also associated with better pulmonary function and a reduction in the risk of pulmonary complications, these findings were clinically relevant.

The data suggested that the benefit of ICNB analgesia decreases progressively and disappears at 24 to 48 hours after surgery. Reliance on ICNB after this period may result in an abrupt lack of analgesia or rebound pain, represented by higher pain scores at 24 hours after surgery for dynamic pain and 48 hours after surgery for static pain.

These factors have motivated further research with the objective of developing a more efficient technique.

The anterior serratus plane block was the first describen. It is a type of regional anaesthetic that is simple to perform and highly effective in providing analgesia. It has no adverse effects, such as respiratory or circulatory depression. In comparison to traditional local infiltration anaesthesia, SAPB necessitates a reduced quantity of local anaesthetics, is devoid of the potential for local anaesthetic poisoning, and extends the duration of analgesia through catheterisation. In comparison to a thoracic epidural block, SAPB does not result in spinal cord injury, epidural haematoma, respiratory depression, or fluctuations50. In comparison to an intercostal nerve block, a SAPB is a relatively simple procedure, necessitating fewer injections and presenting a lower incidence of complications such as pneumothorax. In comparison to a thoracic paravertebral nerve block, a SAPB is a less challenging procedure with no risk of orthostatic hypotension or urinary retention51. In comparison with total intravenous analgesia, SAPB has the advantage of not causing adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, excessive sedation, or respiratory depression caused by opioids. Furthermore, opioids are a more expensive option. Consequently, future research on SAPB may be conducted in an ambulatory setting, such as during breast nodule resection, breast prosthesis implantation, invasive procedures, such as breast tissue pathological biopsy and treatment of intercostal neuralgia.

A relatively recent regional anaesthetic technique that offers significant advantages and has been gaining popularity in the context of thoracic surgery is the erector spinae block. As with numerous other regional techniques, this block can be performed as a single-shot procedure with an appropriate volume of local anaesthetic, or alternatively, by placing a catheter for continuous infusion. Furthermore, this technique is demonstrating encouraging results in the treatment of trauma patients with rib fractures.

The existing literature on the use of ESPB in thoracic surgery is limited to case reports, editorials, and a few clinical trials. The ESPB has been demonstrated to be an efficacious peripheral technique for postoperative pain management in this cohort of patients. These findings are in accordance with the results of the present study, which demonstrated that ESPB provided adequate analgesia following minithoracotomy. The average static and dynamic NRS scores remained below 3 throughout the follow-up period, and the number of requests for additional analgesic drugs was low.

In comparison to TEA and TPVB, ESPB appears to be a safer option, with a minimal risk of pleural puncture and epidural spread. Furthermore, the risk of coagulopathy should be minimal, given that the procedure is performed at a distance from the spinal cord or the epidural venous plexus, thereby avoiding the risk of epidural haematoma. In the initial 48 hours following surgery, patients undergoing continuous ESPB exhibited reduced opioid requirements and reported diminished pain compared to those undergoing ICNB55. There were no differences in respiratory muscle strength, postoperative complications, or time to hospital discharge. However, TPVB appeared to be the preferable method compared with ESPB and ICNB, with a more successful analgesia and less morphine consumption. In comparison with other regional anaesthetic techniques, a variety of outcomes have been documented. Although statistical analysis indicated that ESPB was less effective than thoracic paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block and more effective than serratus anterior plane block in postoperative analgesia, the clinical differences remain unclear. The incidence of haematoma was found to be lower in the ESPB group than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.73)20.

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block promise effective thoracic analgesia compared with systemically administered opioids. Compared with SAP, ESP provides superior quality of recovery at 24 h, lower morbidity, and better analgesia after minimally invasive thoracic surgery. However, the SAP block can play an important role in the management of pain after thoracic surgery by reducing both pain scores and 24-h postoperative opioids consumption. In addition, there is fewer incidence of PONV in the SAP block group.

Regarding the pain control in emergency department Dr Armin recommends ESPB in blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma27.

Analgesia in breast surgery has different connotations, as it involves both intercostal and pectoral nerves. The results of some meta-analysis demonstrate that the Pecs II block is a valuable adjunct for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Compared with patients who received only systemic analgesia, patients who received a Pecs II block not only had significantly less pain at all measured postoperative time-points up to 24 h but also a time to first analgesia request that was prolonged by 5 h on average. Although some might question the clinical significance of a 1–2-point reduction in pain scores on a 0–10 scale, it is worth noting that this represents a reduction of 39–55% from the average pain scores of 2.4–3.5 reported in the control groups. Furthermore, this was achieved with a simultaneous 59% reduction in 24-h opioid consumption. Although the role of peri-operative opioids in tumour metastasis remains uncertain, the importance of fully attenuating the peri-operative stress response possible is unquestioned56 One reason for the popularity of the Pecs II block is that it is a simpler and safer alternative to a thoracic paravertebral block, which many find a challenging technique to perform.

 

Conclusions

With the development of ERAS protocols, the classical approach to post-operative pain control has changed; narcotics are no longer enough. In this area, peripheral nerve blocks have shown good results.

Nowadays, peripheral nerve blocks and their different approaches have shown to be an alternative to central blocks (paravertebral and epidural). ICNB, SAPB, ESPB and PECS are associated with a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery and reduce the amount of opioids during the postoperative period. Furthermore, the current literature supports that some of them offer non-inferior or comparable analgesic efficacy to a TPVB, suggesting that they may also be beneficial in cases where TEA and PVB are not indicated, and even the Pecs II block warrants consideration as a first-line option for regional analgesia in breast surgery.

 

 

 


María Teresa FERNÁNDEZ (Valladolid, Spain)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G33
10:30 - 11:20

ASK THE EXPERT
Psychedelic substances

Chairperson: Brian KINIRONS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, Galway, Ireland, Ireland)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Brian KINIRONS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Galway, Ireland, Ireland)
10:35 - 11:05 #43451 - G33 Psychedelic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Is Ketamine Included?
Psychedelic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Is Ketamine Included?

Psychedelic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Is Ketamine Included?

By;

Amany E. Ayad, MD, FIPP

Professor of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain, Cairo University

One of the main causes of misery and incapacity is chronic pain, which is frequently linked to psychological issues. 

Psychedelic substances are drugs that can exert a psychological effect on patients.

Psychedelic drugs like lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin, exert their action mainly via activation of the serotonin-2A (5-HT2A). (1)

In a trial to understand the actual mode of action of psychedelics in chronic pain setting; Joel Castellanos et al (2) elaborated that, given the complexity of chronic pain, which is still not fully understood, a multitude of somatic and visceral afferent pain signals may strengthen specific  neural circuits through peripheral and central sensitization, leading to the perception of  both physical and emotional  chronic pain experience. Consequently, psychedelics exert their influence on human nociceptive system modulation and serotonin pathway activation.  Additionally, the alterations in functional connections (FC ) seen with psychedelic drugs use suggested a way that these agents could help reverse the changes in neural connections seen in chronic pain states. (2)

Psychedelics may have potential to alleviate pain secondary to a multitude of chronic painful conditions as concluded in an article that was published by Christopher L Robinson et al in March 2024. (3) Mauro Cavarra et al. reported in a different survey conducted that same year, that individuals with fibromyalgia, sciatica, migraine, arthritis, and tension-type headaches can experience analgesic effects from psychedelics. (4)

Psychedelic substances have a generally favorable safety profile, particularly when contrasted with opioid analgesics. However, clinical evidence to date for their use in chronic pain  management is limited and of low quality. (2) Several studies and reports over the past 50 years have shown potential analgesic benefit in cancer pain, phantom limb pain and cluster headache as well (2). Given the current state of the opioid epidemics and limited efficacy of non-opioid analgesics, research on psychedelics as analgesics  is gaining popularity in order to improve the lives of  chronic pain patients. 

Based on the previously provided information, can we add ketamine to the list of psychedelic drugs utilized for chronic pain management!!!!

The answer is YES!

Yes, ketamine is indeed considered a psychedelic drug. It was initially developed as a dissociative anesthetic drug, but has gained attention for its unique effects on perception, consciousness, and mood. When used in controlled settings, ketamine can induce hallucinations, dissociation, and altered states of consciousness. In clinical contexts, it’s also being explored for its potential in treating chronic pain, depression and and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (5)  In the context of resistant depression cases in the west, ketamine clinics all of a sudden began to exhibit a "Trending" attitude.

Since it first entered the pharmaceutical industry more than 50 years ago, ketamine has been used by pain specialists for more than 20 years to treat patients with chronic pain who are refractory, all without the benefit of strict guidelines. We are grateful to the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), which brought up this matter and began drawing attention to the need for recommendations, as originally mentioned by Brian J. Marascalchi and Steve Cohen in their November 2018 newsletter. (6) Shortly after, in collaboration with the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the ASRA, Cohen and his colleagues released the first organized guidelines regarding the use of intravenous ketamine for chronic pain. (7)

Among a limited number of adequately structured systematic reviews we would mention a meta-analysis by Orhurhu V and his colleagues (8), another review by JE Israel et al.(9), and a good review by Riccardi A (10). However we find all these are still not adequate.

 NMDA receptor/ion channel complexes are sited peripherally and centrally within the nervous system. Ketamine is a phenylcyclidine derivative that acts primarily as a non-competitive antagonist of the NMDA receptor, although it also binds to many other sites in the peripheral and central nervous systems (11). Primarily, ketamine exhibits its analgesic, antidepressant, and cognitive effects via the NMDA receptors situated in the central nervous system. Ketamine has also been found to act on the; opioid receptors, γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) receptors, dopamine D2 receptors, nicotinic receptors, muscarinic cholinergic receptors, and a ligand of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. (11) We highlight that ketamine acquires almost the same mode of action (serotonin receptors activation) like other psychedelic drugs.

In the chronic pain setting, ketamine was found to exert a good therapeutic effect in cases of Complex regional pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic neuropathic pain, cancer pain and phantom limb pain.(9)

Given that ketamine is widely accessible and reasonably priced, physicians in countries with limited resources find it especially appealing for treating refractory patients because they are unable to pay for more expensive and advanced treatments like neuromodulation. 

More structured guidelines are still required. But as Carl Sagan eloquently said, “Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence."

References;

1-Kooijman NI, Willegers T, Reuser A, Mulleners WM, Kramers C, Vissers KCP, van der Wal SEI. Are psychedelics the answer to chronic pain: A review of current literature. Pain Pract. 2023 Apr;23(4):447-458. doi: 10.1111/papr.13203. Epub 2023 Jan 11. PMID: 36597700.

2- Castellanos JP, Woolley C, Bruno KA, et al Chronic pain and psychedelics: a review and proposed mechanism of action Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2020;45:486-494. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101273.

3-Robinson CL, Fonseca ACG, Diejomaoh EM, D'Souza RS, Schatman ME, Orhurhu V, Emerick T. Scoping Review: The Role of Psychedelics in the Management of Chronic Pain. J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 11;17:965-973. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S439348. PMID: 38496341; PMCID: PMC10941794.

4-Cavarra M, Mason NL, Kuypers KPC, Bonnelle V, Smith WJ, Feilding A, Kryskow P, Ramaekers JG. Potential analgesic effects of psychedelics on select chronic pain conditions: A survey study. Eur J Pain. 2024 Jan;28(1):153-165. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2171. Epub 2023 Aug 20. PMID: 37599279.

5-Jonkman K, Dahan A, van de Donk T, Aarts L, Niesters M, van Velzen M. Ketamine for pain. F1000Res. 2017 Sep 20;6:F1000 Faculty Rev-1711. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11372.1. PMID: 28979762; PMCID: PMC5609085.

6-Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, et al Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2018;43:521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.

7-Intravenous Ketamine Guidelines for Pain Management; ASRA newsletter,November2018

8-Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):241-254. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185. PMID: 31082965.

9-Israel JE, St Pierre S, Ellis E, Hanukaai JS, Noor N, Varrassi G, Wells M, Kaye AD. Ketamine for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Comprehensive Review. Health Psychol Res. 2021 Jul 10;9(1):25535. doi: 10.52965/001c.25535. PMID: 34746491; PMCID: PMC8567802.

10-Riccardi A, Guarino M, Serra S, Spampinato MD, Vanni S, Shiffer D, Voza A, Fabbri A, De Iaco F; Study and Research Center of the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine. Narrative Review: Low-Dose Ketamine for Pain Management. J Clin Med. 2023 May 2;12(9):3256. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093256. PMID: 37176696; PMCID: PMC10179418.

11-Niesters M, Aarts L, Sarton E, Dahan A. Influence of ketamine and morphine on descending pain modulation in chronic pain patients: a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over proof-of-concept study. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1010-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes578. Epub 2013 Feb 5. PMID: 23384733.


Amany E. AYAD (Cairo, Egypt)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H33
10:30 - 11:20

PRO CON DEBATE
Peripheral nerve catheters are still a valid option

Chairperson: Michal VENGLARCIK (Head of anesthesia) (Chairperson, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
10:30 - 10:35 Introduction. Michal VENGLARCIK (Head of anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
10:35 - 10:50 For the PROs. Roman ZUERCHER (Senior Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Basel, Switzerland)
10:50 - 11:05 For the CONs. eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Lausanne, Switzerland)
11:05 - 11:20 Q&A.
NORTH HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ib33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 38
Fascial Plane Blocks for Thoracic Surgery

220b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ic33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 39
Most Useful Fascial Plane Blocks for Pain Free Abdominal Surgery

WS Expert: Ivan KOSTADINOV (ESRA Council Representative) (WS Expert, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
221a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Id33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 40
Tips and Tricks for US Guided RA Techniques applied in Breast Surgery

WS Expert: Amit PAWA (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, London, United Kingdom)
221b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ja33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 41
Rib Fractures: Which US Guided RA technique should I apply?

WS Expert: Mark CROWLEY (EDRA Faculty) (WS Expert, Oxford, United Kingdom)
221c

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jb33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 42
Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Analgesia in Hip Fracture Surgery

WS Expert: Alexandros MAKRIS (Anaesthesiologist) (WS Expert, Athens, Greece)
221d

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jc33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 43
Most Useful US Guided Blocks for Paediatric RA

WS Expert: Eleana GARINI (Consultant) (WS Expert, Athens, Greece)
223a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jd33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 44
Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Surgery

WS Expert: Clara LOBO (Medical director) (WS Expert, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
223b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ka33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 45
Most Useful Fascial Plane Blocks for Pain Free Thoracic Surgery

WS Expert: Ammar SALTI (Anesthesiologist and Pain Physician) (WS Expert, abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
223c

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kb33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 46
POCUS - eFAST for every Anaesthesiologist

WS Expert: David JOHNSTON (ESRA diploma examiner) (WS Expert, Belfast, United Kingdom)
223d

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kc33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 47
Tricks and Pitfalls in US Guided RA for Lumbar and Thoracic Spine

WS Expert: Peñafrancia CANO (Associate Professor; Chief, Division of Regional Anesthesia, University of the Philippines) (WS Expert, Manila, Philippines)
241

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kd33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 48
US Guided Vascular Access in ICU and ER

WS Expert: Barbara RUPNIK (Consultant anesthetist) (WS Expert, Zurich, Switzerland)
242

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ia33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 67
ESP Block: Tips and Tricks

WS Expert: Aleksejs MISCUKS (Professor) (WS Expert, Riga, Latvia, Latvia)
220a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
La33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 49
UGRA: Tips and Tricks for Image Optimization

WS Expert: Kausik DASGUPTA (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, NUNEATON,UK, United Kingdom)
243

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lb33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 50
US Guided Spinal Pain Treatment

WS Expert: Amy PEARSON (Interventional Pain Physician) (WS Expert, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
244

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lc33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 51
GPS Gluteal Pain Syndrome: Caudal Epidural Injections, Sacroiliac Joint Injection, Piriformis Muscle, Hamstring Tendonitis

WS Expert: Esperanza ORTIGOSA (Chief of the Acute and Chronic Pain Unit) (WS Expert, Madrid, Spain)
245

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ma33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 52
US Guided Fascia Iliaca Blocks: Tips and Tricks

10:30 - 11:30 '})"> #42874 - Ma33 Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Block – Tips and Tricks.
Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Block – Tips and Tricks.

The fascia iliaca block is a regional anesthesia technique where local anesthetic is placed underneath the fascia of the iliacus muscle, effectively blocking the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves (1).  This block is most known for analgesia following hip fractures (1), although it can also be applied to a variety of lower extremity vascular procedures and proximal lower extremity amputations.  Regional anesthesia for hip fractures is associated with decreased mortality, opioid requirements, altered mental status, adverse cardiovascular events, and pulmonary complications (2). The American Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommends regional anesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly with strong evidence (3).  Similarly, the International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture recommends that nerve blocks are offered to patients with hip fractures in addition to either general or regional anaesthesia (4). 

 

A suprainguinal approach to this block is recommended since a more proximal approach is likely to block the articular branches of the nerves (5).  The infrainguinal approach only consistently blocks the femoral nerve, occasionally blocks the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and rarely blocks the obturator nerve (5).  The suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block results in a more complete sensory blockade, more consistent spread in a cranial direction under the fascia iliaca, reduced pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, and better patient satisfaction compared to the infrainguinal approach (6).

 

Although the suprainguinal approach is more effective than infrainguinal at blocking all three nerves, it may be more challenging to perform.   In this session, we’ll review tips and tricks for success with your SIFI blocks.

 

Start with a linear probe in the sagittal orientation over the anterior superior iliac spine (Figure 1).  Next move the probe slightly medial and tilt back lateral to identify the SIFI sonoanatomy (Figure 2).  Above the iliacus muscle we see the internal oblique muscle cephalad and sartorius muscle caudad.  This view is described as looking like a “bow tie” (Figure 3).   For those unfamiliar with ultrasound imaging at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) but are familiar with groin sonoanatomy for vascular access, an alternative approach is to start with the probe in the transverse orientation at the inguinal crease, similar to an ultrasound view for femoral vascular access or a femoral nerve block (Figure 4).  Next, move the probe lateral until the sartorius muscle is identified above the iliopsoas muscle (Figure 5).  Once the sartorius and iliopsoas muscles are identified and centered, turn the probe 90 degrees to the sagittal orientation (Figure 6).  Scan cephalad in this orientation to the level of the ASIS (Figure 7).  Here you will identify the internal oblique and sartorius muscles forming a “bow tie” above the iliacus muscle.

 

I have found increased first pass success rate with SIFI block and minimal needle redirecting with a caudal to cranial approach aiming first for the fascial plane between the sartorius and iliacus muscles or the peak of the iliacus muscle.  Once we reach the correct fascial plane as evidenced by the sartorius and iliacus muscles “unzippering” (Figure 8), we can then hydro-dissect cephalad to the internal oblique and iliacus fascial plane to ensure that our local anesthetic is placed as proximal as possible (Figure 9).  As with all procedures, improved ergonomics allows for greater proceduralist comfort and effectiveness.  It is usually easiest to needle with your dominant hand, and so I recommend that you position yourself so that your dominant hand is needling in a caudal to cranial direction.  For example, if the physician is right-handed and performing a left-sided fascia iliaca block, he or she would stand on the right side of the patient and reach over to the left so that the block needle is in the right dominant hand and advanced in a caudal to cranial direction (Figure 10). 

 

At times it can be challenging to identify the correct fascial plane, especially in frail patients with extensive muscle atrophy.  The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) is seen in the fascial plane between the internal oblique and iliacus muscles.  Identifying this artery can help with orientation to the relevant sonoanatomy (Figure 11).  Occasionally the common iliac artery is seen in long axis above the iliacus muscle (Figure 12).  In this case, sliding the probe slightly medially usually removes the artery from the needle trajectory. If a window cannot be identified without the artery in the needle path, an infrainguinal approach or alternative block should be considered.

 

The fascia of the iliacus muscle is very tough, and it is not unusual to advance through the fascial plane target on first pass into the iliacus muscle.  Intramuscular injection will have a mottled, shreddy appearance rather than the unzippering appearance of two muscles peeling apart in a true fascial plane (Figure 13).  If you overshoot or undershoot, make small adjustments to your needle position until you are directly underneath the fascia of the iliacus muscle and above the muscle.  When local anesthetic is deposited in this location, the fascial plane expands and contracts with injection.  In adults we’ll inject 30 to 40 mL of dilute local anesthetic while keeping in mind the maximum safe dose of local that may be administered (Figure 14).

 

After block completion, we can visualize the spread of local anesthetic distally by scanning the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves.  To scan the femoral nerve, start the probe in the transverse orientation in the inguinal crease.  Local anesthetic should be apparent under the femoral nerve and above the iliopsoas muscle (Figure 15).  Next slide the probe laterally until the sartorius muscle and a small fat pad just lateral to the muscle are identified.  Move the probe 1-2 centimeters distal from here and a branch of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve should be seen in this fat pad surrounded with local anesthetic (Figure 16).  To scan the obturator nerves, move the probe back to the groin and visualize the femoral nerve and vessels in the transverse orientation.  Slide the probe medial and identify the pectineus muscle.  Continue to slide medial until the adductor muscles are seen just medial to the pectineus muscle.  The anterior branch of the obturator nerve is seen between adductor longus and brevis muscles.  The posterior branch of the obturator nerve is seen between adductor brevis and magnus muscles.  After successful completion of the SIFI block, local anesthetic will be seen surrounding both branches of the obturator nerve (Figure 17).


 

References

1.     O'Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24. PMID: 33456890; PMCID: PMC7808109.

2.     Pedersen S, Borgbjerg F, Schousboe B, et al. A comprehensive hip fracture program reduces complication rates and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(10):1831-1838. 

3.     American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. https://www.aaos.org/hipfxcpg.pdf  Published December 3, 2021.

4.     White SM, Altermatt F, Barry J, Ben-David B, Coburn M, Coluzzi F, Degoli M, Dillane D, Foss NB, Gelmanas A, Griffiths R, Karpetas G, Kim JH, Kluger M, Lau PW, Matot I, McBrien M, McManus S, Montoya-Pelaez LF, Moppett IK, Parker M, Porrill O, Sanders RD, Shelton C, Sieber F, Trikha A, Xuebing X. International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):863-874. doi: 10.1111/anae.14225. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29508382.

5.     Vermeylen K, Desmet M, Leunen I, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, Carens D, Caerts B, Seynaeve P, Hadzic A, Van de Velde M. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca compartment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 22:rapm-2018-100092. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100092. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 30798268.

6.     Bansal K, Sharma N, Singh MR, Sharma A, Roy R, Sethi S. Comparison of suprainguinal approach with infrainguinal approach of fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;66(Suppl 6):S294-S299. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_823_21. Epub 2022 Oct 12. PMID: 36425915; PMCID: PMC9680722.


Melody HERMAN (Charlotte, USA)
246

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mb33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 53
Thoracic Intertransverse Process Block as Paravertebral - By - Proxy Blocks

WS Expert: Balavenkat SUBRAMANIAN (Faculty) (WS Expert, Coimbatore, India)
247

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mc33
10:30 - 11:30

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 54
Update on "real time US guidance" for epidural

WS Expert: Urs EICHENBERGER (Head of Department) (WS Expert, Zürich, Switzerland)
248
11:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A31b
11:30 - 12:35

AWARDS CEREMONY

11:30 - 11:50 Carl Koller Award Lecture. Admir HADZIC (Director) (Keynote Speaker, New York, USA)
11:50 - 12:00 Summary of the Albert Van Steenbergue Award Article. Kariem EL BOGHDADLY (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
12:00 - 12:10 Summary of the Chronic pain Award Article. K Harbinder SANDHU (Keynote Speaker, United Kingdom)
12:10 - 12:20 Announcement of the Best free Paper and E-Poster Winners 2024. Luis Fernando VALDES VILCHES (Clinical head) (Keynote Speaker, Marbella, Spain)
12:20 - 12:25 Educational Grants. Axel SAUTER (consultant anaesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Oslo, Norway)
12:25 - 12:30 Research Grants. Axel SAUTER (consultant anaesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Oslo, Norway)
CONGRESS HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
O34
11:30 - 14:30

OFF SITE - Hands - On Cadaver Workshop 8 - PAIN
HEAD & NECK BLOCKS

WS Leader: Robert TIRPAK (lead physician) (WS Leader, Prague, Czech Republic)
Unique and exclusive for RA & Pain Cadaveric Workshops: Only whole-body cadavers will be available for the workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity to master your needling skills, perform the actual blocks on fresh cadavers and to improve your ergonomics under direct supervision of world experts in regional anaesthesia and chronic pain management. There won’t be an organized transportation for going/back from the Cadaver workshop.
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 1. Cranial nerves & distal branches. Manfred GREHER (Medical Hospital Director and Head of Department) (Demonstrator, Vienna, Austria)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 2. Stellate Ganglion Block (Cervical Sympathetic Block) & Cervical Plexus Block - Supine/Lateral position. Kiran KONETI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, SUNDERLAND, United Kingdom)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 3. Cervical Medial Branch Blocks (Lateral). Mario FAJARDO PEREZ (Anesthesia) (Demonstrator, Madrid, Spain)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 4. Occipital Nerves (GON, TON, LON). Vedran FRKOVIC (Senior Consultant in Anaesthesiology and pain medicine) (Demonstrator, Linkoping/ Sweden, Sweden)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 5. Cervical Nerve Roots Blocks, Lateral/ Supine. Raja REDDY (Consultant Anaesthetist & Pain Physician) (Demonstrator, Kent, United Kingdom)
11:30 - 14:30 Workstation 6. Shoulder Suprascapular nerve, lateral pectoralis, Axillary, Subscapularis, Lateral/ Prone. Dusan MACH (Clinical Lead) (Demonstrator, Nové Město na Moravě, Czech Republic)
Anatomy Institute
12:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G35
12:30 - 13:30

AGA SESSION

Small Hall
LUNCH BREAK
13:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B34
13:30 - 14:50

ESRA Educational Video Competition

Chairperson: Paolo GROSSI (Consultant) (Chairperson, milano, Italy)
Jurys: Oya Yalcin COK (EDRA Part I Vice Chair, EDRA Examiner, lecturer, instructor) (Jury, Türkiye, USA), Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Jury, Leuven, Belgium), Brian KINIRONS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Jury, Galway, Ireland, Ireland), Ana Patrícia MARTINS PEREIRA (Resident Doctor) (Jury, Braga, Portugal), Athmaja THOTTUNGAL (yes) (Jury, Canterbury, United Kingdom)
13:30 - 14:50 Is That A Pneumothorax? International Evidence-Based Recommendations for Lung POCUS. Melody ANDERSON (Director of Regional Anesthesiology) (Poster Presenter, Charlotte, USA)
13:30 - 14:50 Parasternal Blocks. Burhan DOST (Anesthesiologist) (Poster Presenter, Samsun, Turkey)
13:30 - 14:50 Video on Sonoanatomy of the Lumbar Spine. Hemangini BAROT (-) (Poster Presenter, Coventry, United Kingdom)
13:30 - 14:50 Scalp Block as the key to comfortably managing awake craniotomy patient. QR virtual tour at the end. Ana SUAREZ (Anesthesiologist) (Poster Presenter, Bogotá, Colombia)
13:30 - 14:50 Neuronavigation -Guided Scalp Block. Ergun MENDES (Poster Presenter, İstanbul, Turkey)
13:30 - 14:50 ULTRA SOUND ASSISTED SPINE SCANNING. Azaresh RAMINEEDI (Specialty Doctor) (Poster Presenter, Prescot, United Kingdom)
13:30 - 14:50 3 best Educational Video Presentations. Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Jury, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
PANORAMA HALL
14:00

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A33
14:00 - 14:50

ASK THE EXPERT
Chronic pain in pediatrics

Chairperson: Barbara RUPNIK (Consultant anesthetist) (Chairperson, Zurich, Switzerland)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Barbara RUPNIK (Consultant anesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Zurich, Switzerland)
14:05 - 14:35 #43306 - A33 Chronic pain in children.
Chronic pain in children.

Chronic pain in children and adolescents, more than just a pill. 

Introduction and epidemiology

It was in 2022 that well-known researchers involved in pediatric pain made a statement for more attention for pediatric pain in general, and where more research concerning pediatric pain was needed, using the motto: make pain matter, make pain understood, make pain visible and make pain better (Eccleston et al., 2021). Currently there are gaps in knowledge of validated criteria for certain pediatric pain conditions, adequate treatment protocols, adequate dosing of medication for all age groups and an absolute lack of evidence for invasive interventions (Boulkedid et al., 2018; Shah et al., 2016). And despite things are improving the amount of publications related to pain in children was in 2023 around one tenth of the amount related to pain adults (Krane 2023).

Chronic pain in children and adolescents is a common problem with a prevalence cited between 11% and 38% of the general population (King et al., 2011). Between 2004 and 2010 an increase was observed of 831% in the amount of pediatric pain patients presenting with chronic pain in 43 tertiary centers in the United States (Coffelt et al., 2013). This may be caused by an enhanced detection and awareness but an increase in prevalence of chronic pain cannot be excluded.

 

Risk factors

As risk factors for chronic pain are considered: female sex, age around 12-14 years, children with anxiety or depression, other chronic health conditions, low socio-economic status but also additional neurodevelopment disorders like autism or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (King et al., 2011; Lipsker et al., 2018). Furthermore adverse child experiences like child abuse or bullying at school are considered as risk factors as well as an immigration background, the last especially in younger children (Abrahamyan et al., 2024; Roman-Juan et al., 2024; Solé et al., 2024).

 

Consequences of chronic pain in childhood

Consequences of pain in childhood or adolescence can be more anxiety and depression with sometimes suicidal ideation, sleep disturbances, social isolation, school absence and therefore a lower school achievement, an impaired athletic performance and generally a lower quality of life. In addition, there is the burden through involvement of parents and siblings. So adequate treatment of these chronic pain disorders in childhood or adolescence is eminent. Not just because of the actual burden but also because around two third of children with chronic pain in childhood or adolescence might present themselves in an adult pain center in adulthood (Kashikar-Zuck et al., 2014; Walker et al., 2010).

 

Presentations of pediatric pain

Now what kind or pain conditions are generally seen in a pediatric pain center ? This may vary from one pediatric pain center to another, by country and how care is arranged. Generally it concerns musculoskeletal and limb pain (e.g. complex regional pain syndrome), headache, abdominal pain, back pain, chronic postsurgical pain, pain that comes with chronic diseases like sickle cell anemia or neurofibromatosis and more general; pain like functional pain. Furthermore there is pain in palliative care situations.

 

Overlooking the different types of pain, next to nociceptive pain which is most of the time acute pain, chronic pain contains often neuropathic pain, a pain type that is often overlooked and for which specific diagnostic questionnaires are not validated for children. Also the causes of neuropathic pain in children are often different from those in adults (Howard et al., 2014; Kachko et al., 2014). Since a few years there is a new descriptor, that involves pain not caused through tissue damage or disease or damage of the somatosensory system but through altered pain processing: nociplastic pain. This new descriptor can help us to elucidate the often used explanation for their pain complaints to patients an parents: Functional pain, or better dysfunctional pain (Schechter 2014).

 

Assessment and treatment

Chronic pediatric pain assessment and treatment according a bio-psycho-social model by a multi- or interdisciplinary team is generally considered state of the art nowadays. Again, depending on how care is organized by center, regionally or nationally (Liossi et al., 2019; Miró et al., 2017).

Generally such interdisciplinary team consists of a pediatric pain specialist, psychologist and physiotherapist (3 P’s) with eventually complementary therapists like occupational or music therapists. This way each team member has treatment modalities from their own professional background (Rolfe 2016).

First step, and crucial in assessment and treatment should be connection with and feedback to the patient and parents in the so called “Golden Half Hour” (Schechter et al., 2021). One should validate symptoms, emphasize a multi- or interdisciplinary treatment plan and give education. Diagnostic uncertainty in patients or parents might otherwise lead to more catastrophizing and higher pain scores (Neville et al., 2020).

Furthermore the target in treatment is in the first place; recovery of function with the restoration of daily activities and sleep rhythm, next to reduction of pain. In such a treatment program physiotherapy has proven it’s benefit, for example through a graded exposure or graded activity plan, not only in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain but also in abdominal pain or tension headache.

Psychologic therapies, like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT),  have proven to be efficient, also to elucidate pain-maintaining factors (Fisher et al., 2018). Additionally, for the treatment of chronic pain after a traumatic injury, trauma therapy like eye movement desensitization an reprocessing (EMDR) and hypnosis techniques can be incorporated in the armament of the psychologist. Pending assessment in the clinic, some types of therapy may already be offered via the internet but the evidence up till now is low (Fisher et al., 2019; Murray et al., 2020).

Furthermore, pain medication can be offered by the physician of the interdisciplinary team as treatment by itself but also to make physiotherapy more feasible. Most used medications for the treatment of chronic pain are non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s), Cox-2-inhibitors, gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants (TCA’s), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI’s). For the use of opioids there is only place in special pain conditions and palliative care (Cooper et al., 2017). Most evidence for the use of medication as well as doses advices are abstracted from literature in adults. In daily practice hardly treatment protocols are used and one must keep in mind that generally the evidence for the use of medication in chronic pediatric pain is very low (de Leeuw et al., 2020; Eccleston et al., 2019).

As an extra tool transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) could be used. It hardly has any side effects and has the advantage that it gives patients a way of self-control in their pain treatment. On the contrary there is no robust evidence for invasive interventions in the treatment of chronic pediatric pain (Shah et al., 2016; Zernikow et al., 2012). A drawback is further that these interventions in children have to be performed under sedation or general anesthesia.

 

The format of interdisciplinary treatment programs varies from clinic to clinic, as does the way of reimbursement for such treatments, which is regulated differently from country to country. Often it is provided by means of an outward patient program but clinics can also offer an internal intensive rehabilitation program. Such an intensive rehabilitation program may offer better results than a program in an outward patient setting (Claus et al., 2022; Dekker et al., 2020; Hechler et al., 2015; Simons et al., 2013; Wager et al., 2021) A list of clinics with a pediatric pain program worldwide can be found under: http://childpain.org/index.php/resources/

 

Conclusion

Chronic pain in children and adolescents is an increasing problem in Western Europe and North America, but an increased prevalence cannot be excluded in the Non-Western world (Coffelt et al., 2013; McCarthy and de Leeuw 2019).

Assessment of chronic pain and treatment of chronic pain in children and adolescents is time consuming and needs great commitment from the treatment team. Trust and bonding of the patient and parents with the treatment team are essential and since often these patients are frequently referred from one professional to another without satisfying result, this might be difficult to achieve and should be priority during the first assessment (Schechter et al., 2021).

 

The recently published study of Pico showed that chronic pain in children is still underdiagnosed and undertreated mainly due to a lack of knowledge of health care professionals (mainly pediatricians in this study) of mechanisms contributing to persistence of chronic and adequate management of chronic pain (Pico et al., 2023). Education, treatment protocols and up to date guidelines and programs are mandatory, just as adequate guidelines where and by whom (preferably pediatric pain specialists) these children should be treated (McCarthy and de Leeuw 2019; Miró et al., 2017).

 

 

Abrahamyan A, Lucas R, Severo M, Talih M, Fraga S. Association between adverse childhood experiences and bodily pain in early adolescence. Stress Health 2024: e3383.

Boulkedid R, Abdou AY, Desselas E, Monégat M, de Leeuw TG, Avez-Couturier J, Dugue S, Mareau C, Charron B, Alberti C, Kaguelidou F. The research gap in chronic paediatric pain: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Pain 2018;22: 261-271.

Claus BB, Stahlschmidt L, Dunford E, Major J, Harbeck-Weber C, Bhandari RP, Baerveldt A, Neß V, Grochowska K, Hübner-Möhler B, Zernikow B, Wager J. Intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for children and adolescents with chronic noncancer pain: a preregistered systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Pain 2022;163: 2281-2301.

Coffelt TA, Bauer BD, Carroll AE. Inpatient characteristics of the child admitted with chronic pain. Pediatrics 2013;132: e422-429.

Cooper TE, Fisher E, Gray AL, Krane E, Sethna N, van Tilburg MA, Zernikow B, Wiffen PJ. Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7: Cd012538.

de Leeuw TG, der Zanden TV, Ravera S, Felisi M, Bonifazi D, Tibboel D, Ceci A, Kaguelidou F, de Wildt SN, On Behalf Of The Gapp C. Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic and Mixed Pain in Children and Adolescents: Results of a Survey Study amongst Practitioners. Children (Basel) 2020;7.

Dekker C, Goossens M, Winkens B, Remerie S, Bastiaenen C, Verbunt J. Functional Disability in Adolescents with Chronic Pain: Comparing an Interdisciplinary Exposure Program to Usual Care. Children (Basel) 2020;7.

Eccleston C, Fisher E, Cooper TE, Grégoire MC, Heathcote LC, Krane E, Lord SM, Sethna NF, Anderson AK, Anderson B, Clinch J, Gray AL, Gold JI, Howard RF, Ljungman G, Moore RA, Schechter N, Wiffen PJ, Wilkinson NMR, Williams DG, Wood C, van Tilburg MAL, Zernikow B. Pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in children: an overview of systematic reviews. Pain 2019;160: 1698-1707.

Eccleston C, Fisher E, Howard RF, Slater R, Forgeron P, Palermo TM, Birnie KA, Anderson BJ, Chambers CT, Crombez G, Ljungman G, Jordan I, Jordan Z, Roberts C, Schechter N, Sieberg CB, Tibboel D, Walker SM, Wilkinson D, Wood C. Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2021;5: 47-87.

Fisher E, Law E, Dudeney J, Eccleston C, Palermo TM. Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4: Cd011118.

Fisher E, Law E, Dudeney J, Palermo TM, Stewart G, Eccleston C. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;9: Cd003968.

Hechler T, Kanstrup M, Holley AL, Simons LE, Wicksell R, Hirschfeld G, Zernikow B. Systematic Review on Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment of Children With Chronic Pain. Pediatrics 2015;136: 115-127.

Howard RF, Wiener S, Walker SM. Neuropathic pain in children. Arch Dis Child 2014;99: 84-89.

Kachko L, Ben Ami S, Lieberman A, Shor R, Tzeitlin E, Efrat R. Neuropathic pain other than CRPS in children and adolescents: incidence, referral, clinical characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes. Paediatr Anaesth 2014;24: 608-613.

Kashikar-Zuck S, Cunningham N, Sil S, Bromberg MH, Lynch-Jordan AM, Strotman D, Peugh J, Noll J, Ting TV, Powers SW, Lovell DJ, Arnold LM. Long-term outcomes of adolescents with juvenile-onset fibromyalgia in early adulthood. Pediatrics 2014;133: e592-600.

King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, MacNevin RC, McGrath PJ, Parker L, MacDonald AJ. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain 2011;152: 2729-2738.

Krane EJ. Some innovations in pediatric pain management.  2023.

Liossi C, Johnstone L, Lilley S, Caes L, Williams G, Schoth DE. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary interventions in paediatric chronic pain management: a systematic review and subset meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2019;123: e359-e371.

Lipsker CW, Bölte S, Hirvikoski T, Lekander M, Holmström L, Wicksell RK. Prevalence of autism traits and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in a clinical sample of children and adolescents with chronic pain. J Pain Res 2018;11: 2827-2836.

McCarthy KF and de Leeuw TG. Trickle-down healthcare in paediatric chronic pain. Br J Anaesth 2019;123: e188-e190.

Miró J, McGrath PJ, Finley GA, Walco GA. Pediatric chronic pain programs: current and ideal practice. Pain Rep 2017;2: e613.

Murray CB, de la Vega R, Loren DM, Palermo TM. Moderators of Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Chronic Pain: Who Benefits From Treatment at Long-Term Follow-Up? J Pain 2020;21: 603-615.

Neville A, Jordan A, Pincus T, Nania C, Schulte F, Yeates KO, Noel M. Diagnostic uncertainty in pediatric chronic pain: nature, prevalence, and consequences. Pain Rep 2020;5: e871.

Pico M, Matey-Rodríguez C, Domínguez-García A, Menéndez H, Lista S, Santos-Lozano A. Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge about Pediatric Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel) 2023;10.

Rolfe P. Paediatric chronic pain. Anaesth Int Care Med 2016;17: 531-535.

Roman-Juan J, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Solé E, Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, Miró J. Immigration background as a risk factor of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain in children and adolescents living in Spain: differences as a function of age. Pain 2024;165: 1372-1379.

Schechter NL. Functional pain: time for a new name. JAMA Pediatr 2014;168: 693-694.

Schechter NL, Coakley R, Nurko S. The Golden Half Hour in Chronic Pediatric Pain-Feedback as the First Intervention. JAMA Pediatr 2021;175: 7-8.

Shah RD, Cappiello D, Suresh S. Interventional Procedures for Chronic Pain in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Current Evidence. Pain Pract 2016;16: 359-369.

Simons LE, Sieberg CB, Pielech M, Conroy C, Logan DE. What does it take? Comparing intensive rehabilitation to outpatient treatment for children with significant pain-related disability. J Pediatr Psychol 2013;38: 213-223.

Solé E, Roman-Juan J, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, Miró J. School bullying and peer relationships in children with chronic pain. Pain 2024;165: 1169-1176.

Wager J, Ruhe AK, Stahlschmidt L, Leitsch K, Claus BB, Häuser W, Brähler E, Dinkel A, Kocalevent R, Zernikow B. Long-term outcomes of children with severe chronic pain: Comparison of former patients with a community sample. Eur J Pain 2021;25: 1329-1341.

Walker LS, Dengler-Crish CM, Rippel S, Bruehl S. Functional abdominal pain in childhood and adolescence increases risk for chronic pain in adulthood. Pain 2010;150: 568-572.

Zernikow B, Dobe M, Hirschfeld G, Blankenburg M, Reuther M, Maier C. [Please don't hurt me!: a plea against invasive procedures in children and adolescents with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)]. Schmerz 2012;26: 389-395.


Tom G. DE LEEUW (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C36
14:00 - 15:00

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Peripheral Neuromodulation

Chairperson: Jan BOUBLIK (Assistant Professor) (Chairperson, Stanford, USA)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Jan BOUBLIK (Assistant Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Stanford, USA)
14:05 - 14:20 Targets for peripheral neuromodulation in chronic pain. Kenneth CANDIDO (Speaker/presenter) (Keynote Speaker, OAK BROOK, USA)
14:20 - 14:35 #43460 - C36 Peripheral Neurostimulation in Postoperative Pain and its role in preventing persistent post surgery chronic pain.
Peripheral Neurostimulation in Postoperative Pain and its role in preventing persistent post surgery chronic pain.

Electroanalgesia is based on “gate control Theory” (activation of large motor fibbers inhibits transmition of pain signals from small fibbers).

New dispositives ultrasound guided, allow a lead to be inserted approximately 0.5 to 3.0 cm close to peripheral nerves.(1)

In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first PNS device designed  for percutaneous placement portability and short term use.

The main question that evidence should answer is if perisferic stimulation could replace or potentiate the use of perisferic catheter and integrate this dispositive to multimodal perioperative analgesia.(2)

The accessibility to ultrasound machines,the high prevalence of anaesthesiologists with skills in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, the development of a  small stimulator that can be stick into the skin, the development of an insulated electrical lead specifically designed for percutaneous, extended use (up to 60 days) in the periphery now allow the wide application of PNS to treat postoperative pain.(1)

PNS use in the perioperative setting is still on its beginnings, and require high quality prospective clinical trials to definitively demonstrate efficacy and feasibility of this technology in the surgical environment. (2)

The only device with FDA clearance and published cases for the treatment of acute pain is the SPRINT PNS system (SPR Therapeutics, LLC, OH, USA). For both acute and chronic pain in the back and/or extremities for up to 60 days. This device include two components: a percutaneous electrical lead to deliver the stimulation to the target nerve and a battery-powered external pulse generator. (3)

One of the main reasons for the increased interest in PNS  it is the  potential to modulate pain signalling and decrease neuronal sensitization, with opioid sparing effect, reducing the incidence of hyperalgesia , allodynia and the neuropathic pain in the postoperative period reducing its persistence. It can be use alone or together with pharmacological approach performing also a nerve block. The option to switch between chemical or electric nerve stimulation in the postoperative period may have good results. (2)

Stratifying the risk of develop of persistent postoperative pain is essential to allow to PNS to be a cost effective preventative measure. Early PNS may avoid priming/sensitizing nervous system providing enhanced analgesia for patients developing or with previous neuropathic pain. PNS has the potential more than control the pain, it can improve recovery recruiting and strengthening affected muscles groups and nerve regeneration. (2)

 Specific surgeries: In knee arthroplasty , neurostimulate sciatic and femoral nerve has allowed opioid sparring .No falls, motor blocks or infections.

PNS seem to be a promising useful techniques in foot surgery, placing an electrode near the sciatic nerve in hallux valgus surgery. (5)

In rotator cuff repair the use of neurostimulation in interscalene approach do not showed appreciable differences if the leads where placed in the suprascapular nerve.(6) In cruciate ligaments repair. A electrode could be placed at femoral nerve(5)

A randomized placebo controlled trail of 60 days in postoperative  patients after knee replacement showed relief or persistent postoperative pain and improved function. These results provide evidence from a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showing that percutaneous PNS is safe and can provide sustained benefits for patients with postoperative pain after TKA.(4)

 As benefits PNS avoid the challenges of management local anaesthetics infusion pumps, eliminate the risk of medication toxicity and obtain a longer length of analgesia compared with peripheral catheter. Combined, these characteristics permit a far longer duration of use for PNS compared with continuous peripheral nerve blocks, possibly providing both preoperative and subsequently postoperative analgesia that outlasts the pain resulting from nearly all surgical procedures

Limitations of PNS:  Sadly the costs and accessibility of these dispositives are still unaffordable in ordinary conditions. (2) The leads are fragile and can be damaged or be broken during its exit and some part or it may persist inside the patient .(1)

There is no consensus on when and how much time  PNS must be use in postoperative.(2)

PNS use in managing acute pain and in the transitional period  is promising. It must overcome many obstacles  before it can be introduced into routine practice. We must determine which patients, which types of surgeries, and which nerves are the best candidates for this treatment. We need to determine if a PNS lead should be placed before surgery, immediately after surgery, during the subacute transitional pain period, or only after chronic pain develops. (2)

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS may serve as an alternative approach free of some of the limitations associated with peripheral nerve blocks for this patient population. However the evidence is currently limited to small-scale feasibility studies. Further large-scale prospective, studies are necessary. (5)

 


Ana SCHWARTZMANN BRUNO (Montevideo, Uruguay)
14:35 - 14:50 No more implants! External neuromodulation high and low frequency. Teodor GOROSZENIUK (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
14:50 - 15:00 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D36
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
TEA is better than TAP for abdominal surgery

Chairperson: Mark CROWLEY (EDRA Faculty) (Chairperson, Oxford, United Kingdom)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Mark CROWLEY (EDRA Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Oxford, United Kingdom)
14:05 - 14:20 For the PROs. Marcus THUDIUM (Consultant anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Bonn, Germany)
14:20 - 14:35 For the CONs. Neel DESAI (Consultant in Anaesthetics) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
South Hall 1B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E36
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
Peripheral nerve blocks: Awake or asleep?

Chairperson: Nabil ELKASSABANY (Professor) (Chairperson, Charlottesville, USA)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Nabil ELKASSABANY (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Charlottesville, USA)
14:05 - 14:20 #43264 - E36 AWAKE Should be preferred.
AWAKE Should be preferred.

During recent years, the once widely spread assumption that peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) shell only be performed in awake adult patients has been progressively questioned. The increasing evidences showing the rarity of catastrophic nerve lesions (1) and the example of paediatric anaesthesia, where PNB are regularly done under general anaesthesia, with extremely rare complications, have contributed to revive the debate on the opportunity to reconsider this dogma.

However, some rational objections could be reasonably presented for consideration by Colleagues sustaining the idea that performing PNB in adult patients is a safe practice, which should become the new standard of care.

1.    Catastrophic, permanent nerve injuries after PNB are rare, but they represent only the tip of a very big iceberg, made of a whole range of minor to moderate symptoms related to a nerve suffering. Those symptoms, even if transient, are far more frequent and their incidence after PNB might be as high as 10% (2).

2.    Even if characterised by a favourable prognosis, those complications nevertheless often determine a loss of productivity and/or a tangible impairment of patients’ quality of life, consequently representing the main reason for litigations in non-obstetric anaesthesia cases (3). Those litigations outcome does not depend on the entity or duration of the actual damage (4).

3.    In case of litigation, the Anaesthetist involved is asked to demonstrate that she has acted lege artis, i.e. doing whatever it takes in order to minimise the portion of controllable risk, beside the intrinsic procedural risk (alea terapeutica). In case she did not, according to the vast majority of European Countries legislations, she can be accused of imprudence in her clinical practice. According to the current level of knowledge, the only way we have to minimize this controllable risk during a PNB is by avoiding nerve puncturing and intraneural injection. Even if it has been shown that paraesthesia might not be elicited in more than a half of awake patients, even in case of needle to nerve contact (5), the concept of compound risk teaches us how even this per se unreliable method can contribute to significantly increase the probability of detecting a nerve puncture, when combined with one or –better- more other methods (ultrasound guidance, nerve stimulation, injection pressure monitoring).

4.    Nerve lesions are not the most frequent and potentially catastrophic complications of PNB, nor are the only reason why an awake patients might help to increase the level of safety during these procedures. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) occurs in more than 8% of cases and its incidence is probably increasing, given the increasing popularity of high volume infiltrative blocks (6). In case of accidental intravascular injection, early neurologic symptoms are the only signs, which my guide to the correct diagnosis and induce the Anaesthetist to immediately stop the local anaesthetic injection and initiate appropriate treatment, thus avoiding a potentially fatal progression. This is precisely why current recommendations on acute LAST risk minimisation almost invariably recommend avoiding deep sedation and continuously interacting with patients throughout the procedure.

 

References

1.    Preliminary results of the Australasian regional anaesthesia collaboration. Barrington MJ et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 534-541.

2.    Complications of peripheral nerve blocks. Jeng CL et al. Brit J Anaesth 2010; 105: 97-107.

3.    Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Szypula K et al. Anaesthesia 2010: 65: 443-452.

4.    Litigation in Canada against anesthesiolists practicing regional anesthesia. A review of closed claims. Peng PWH et al. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 105-112.

5.    The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound. Perlas et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 445-450.

6.    Local anaestetic systemic toxicity. Linsey EC et al. Brit J Anaesth Education 2015: 15: 136-142.


Andrea SAPORITO (Bellinzona, Switzerland)
14:20 - 14:35 ASLEEP is preferred. Peter MERJAVY (Consultant Anaesthetist & Acute Pain Lead) (Keynote Speaker, Craigavon, United Kingdom)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F36
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
Are abdominal wall blocks required for minor abdominal surgery?

Chairperson: Ismet TOPCU (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, İzmir, Turkey)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Ismet TOPCU (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, İzmir, Turkey)
14:05 - 14:20 For the PROs. Aysu SALVIZ (Attending Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, St. Louis, USA)
14:20 - 14:35 For the CONs. Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G36
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
Radiofrequency ablation as preventive treatment for development of postoperative and persistent pain after surgery

Chairperson: Steven COHEN (Professor) (Chairperson, Chicago, USA)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. Steven COHEN (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Chicago, USA)
14:05 - 14:20 For the PROs. Thomas HAAG (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Oswestry, United Kingdom)
14:20 - 14:35 For the CONs. Dan Sebastian DIRZU (consultant, head of department) (Keynote Speaker, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
Small Hall

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H36
14:00 - 14:50

PRO CON DEBATE
AI will soon be routine part of regional anesthesia

Chairperson: James BOWNESS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Chairperson, London, United Kingdom)
14:00 - 14:05 Introduction. James BOWNESS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
14:05 - 14:20 For the PROs. Kariem EL BOGHDADLY (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
14:20 - 14:35 For the CONs. Sandy KOPP (Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Rochester, USA)
14:35 - 14:50 Q&A.
NORTH HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ia35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 55
Update on "US assistance" for difficult spine anatomy

WS Expert: Vivian IP (Hospital) (WS Expert, Calgary, Canada)
220a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ib35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 56
US Guided Lumbar Plexus Block: Parasaggital and Samrock Approaches for Hip and Knee Surgery

WS Expert: Xavier SALA-BLANCH (chief of orthopedics anaesthesia) (WS Expert, BARCELONA, Spain)
220b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ic35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 57
Fascial Plane Blocks for Abdominal Surgery

WS Expert: Kamen VLASSAKOV (Chief,Division of Regional&Orthopedic Anesthesiology;Director,Regional Anesthesiology Fellowship) (WS Expert, Boston, USA)
221a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Id35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 58
Rib Fractures: What RA technique is the best?

WS Expert: Ana LOPEZ (Consultant) (WS Expert, Barcelona, Spain)
221b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
La35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 37
Brachial Plexus Blockade: Most Common PNBs for Upper Extremity Surgery

WS Expert: Moira ROBERTSON (Head of department) (WS Expert, Nyon, Switzerland)
243

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ja35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 59
US guided PNBs for Trauma Patients: How to master the most important blocks

WS Expert: Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chief of pain medicine department) (WS Expert, Vinnitsa, Ukraine)
221c

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jb35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 60
Basic Ophthalmic Blocks for an anaesthesiologist

WS Expert: Friedrich LERSCH (senior consultant) (WS Expert, Berne, Switzerland)
221d

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jc35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 61
Blocks for awake carotid surgery

WS Expert: Sina GRAPE (Head of Department) (WS Expert, Sion, Switzerland)
223a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Jd35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 62
Blocks for awake shoulder surgery

WS Expert: Balavenkat SUBRAMANIAN (Faculty) (WS Expert, Coimbatore, India)
223b

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ka35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 63
Most important blocks for hip surgery

WS Expert: Philip PENG (Office) (WS Expert, Toronto, Canada)
223c

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kb35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 64
PNBs for postoperative analgesia following CS

WS Expert: Lubos BENO (Doctor) (WS Expert, USTI NAD LABEM, Czech Republic)
223d

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kc35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 65
Brachial Plexus Blockade above the clavicle

WS Expert: Balaji PACKIANATHASWAMY (regional anaesthesia) (WS Expert, Hull, UK, United Kingdom)
241

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Kd35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON AI WORKSHOP 3
AI to improve your presentations

WS Expert: Andrzej DASZKIEWICZ (anesthesiologist) (WS Expert, Cieszyn, Poland)
242

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lb35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 68
Mastering Interscalene nerve block

WS Expert: Louise MORAN (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, Letterkenny, Ireland)
244

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Lc35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 69
Upper Limb Surgery: Distal Blocks

WS Expert: Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (WS Expert, Leuven, Belgium)
245

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Ma35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 70
PVB: Tips and Tricks

WS Expert: Livija SAKIC (anaesthesiologist) (WS Expert, Zagreb, Croatia)
246

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mb35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 71
US Guided Sciatic Nerve Block

WS Expert: Jose Alejandro AGUIRRE (Head of Ambulatory Center Europaallee) (WS Expert, Zurich, Switzerland)
247

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
Mc35
14:00 - 15:00

"Mini" HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 72
PNBs for Pain Free THA

WS Expert: Matthew OLDMAN (Consultant Anaesthetist) (WS Expert, Plymouth, United Kingdom)
248
15:00

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B34b
15:00 - 15:30

ESRA Infographics Competition

Chairperson: Paolo GROSSI (Consultant) (Chairperson, milano, Italy)
Jurys: Oya Yalcin COK (EDRA Part I Vice Chair, EDRA Examiner, lecturer, instructor) (Jury, Türkiye, USA), Steve COPPENS (Head of Clinic) (Jury, Leuven, Belgium), Brian KINIRONS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Jury, Galway, Ireland, Ireland), Clara LOBO (Medical director) (Jury, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Ana Patrícia MARTINS PEREIRA (Resident Doctor) (Jury, Braga, Portugal), Athmaja THOTTUNGAL (yes) (Jury, Canterbury, United Kingdom)
15:00 - 15:04 #43500 - Regional Anesthesia in Patients with Antithrombotic Drugs.
Regional Anesthesia in Patients with Antithrombotic Drugs.

Regional anesthesia in patients undergoing treatment with antithrombotic drugs presents significant challenges due to the increased risk of bleeding. We describe a clinical scenario involving patients on antithrombotic treatment who require deep nerve and/or neuraxial blocks via single puncture without catheter insertion. This infographic is based on recommendations according to the Joint ESAIC/ESRA Guidelines on "Regional Anesthesia in Patients on Antithrombotic Drugs”.
Hipolito LABANDEYRA (Barcelona, Spain), Xavier SALA-BLANCH
15:04 - 15:08 #43045 - Gastronomy Of Prandial Status With Gastric Ultrasound.
Gastronomy Of Prandial Status With Gastric Ultrasound.

Gastric ultrasound is an essential skill for anesthesiologists, enabling real-time assessment of gastric contents at the bedside and playing a crucial role in risk stratification for patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration. This infographic provides a comprehensive overview of clinical indications, acquisition of standard images, sonographic interpretation, and the application of informed decision-making through gastric ultrasound in the perioperative period.


Jie Cong YEOH, Gee Ho SIEW (Klang, Malaysia), Shahridan MOHD FATHIL
15:08 - 15:12 #43540 - Point of care ultrasound for patients on GLP-1 receptor agonist.
Point of care ultrasound for patients on GLP-1 receptor agonist.

GLP-1 RAs delay gastric emptying and increase residual gastric content and aspiration risk during anesthesia. Gastric POCUS assesses the gastric content of preoperative patients with GLP-1 RAs. A curved probe was used in the epigastrium to evaluate the antral content in the supine and RLD positions. Calculate gastric volume (GV) using the antral CSA. Risk stratification: GV < 1.5 mL/kg (low) and GV > 1.5 mL/kg (high). Adjustment of surgical and anesthetic plans
Ana Maria SUAREZ (Bogotá, Colombia), Maria Jose PELAEZ, William AMAYA, Andrés Felipe ZULUAGA, Andrea Carolina PEREZ-PRADILLA
15:12 - 15:16 #43482 - Points for Pain.
Points for Pain.

Approximately 3000 Years ago was the first recorded use of acupuncture in medicine. Its useful healing properties spread westward along trade routes originating in China Acupuncture in the Operating Room: Acupuncture can be implemented during surgery to help patients with: Pain Relief, Nausea, Vomiting, Anxiety, Post-procedure recovery. Timeline: Patient is induced for surgery, Acupuncture needles are placed, Needles are connected to 30Hz, Needles remain in the ear for 60 min.
Marko POPOVIC (New York, USA), Stephanie CHENG
15:16 - 15:20 #43656 - Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks for Craniotomy Analgesia.
Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks for Craniotomy Analgesia.

See attached infographic : scalp blocks.pdf
Hiram ABRAHAMS, Hiram ABRAHAMS (Cape Town, South Africa)
15:20 - 15:24 #43552 - What is blocking the block? Causes of fascial plane block failure.
What is blocking the block? Causes of fascial plane block failure.

With the plethora of Fascial Plane Blocks being described, questions regarding their effectiveness, cause and rate of failure still remain unanswered. With this infographic we are describing the various factors associated with failure of fascial plane blocks.
Dr. Shruti SHREY (PATNA, India), Dr.chandni SINHA, Dr.amarjeet KUMAR, Dr.ajeet KUMAR
15:24 - 15:28 3 best Infographics winners.
PANORAMA HALL
COFFEE BREAK
15:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B36
15:30 - 16:20

PRO CON DEBATE
Children at Risk for Compartment Syndrome should receive a block

Chairperson: Sandy KOPP (Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine) (Chairperson, Rochester, USA)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Sandy KOPP (Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine) (Keynote Speaker, Rochester, USA)
15:35 - 15:50 For the PROs. Barbara VERSYCK (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Turnhout, Belgium)
15:50 - 16:05 For the CONs. Valeria MOSSETTI (Anesthesiologist) (Keynote Speaker, Torino, Italy)
16:05 - 16:20 Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
C38
15:30 - 17:20

NETWORKING SESSION
RAPM: Best current publications

Chairperson: Brian SITES (Faculty) (Chairperson, Plainfield, USA)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Brian SITES (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Plainfield, USA)
15:35 - 15:57 Top papers on acute pain. Michael HERRICK (Faculty Member) (Keynote Speaker, Hanover, NH, USA)
15:57 - 16:19 Top papers on chronic pain. Kenneth CANDIDO (Speaker/presenter) (Keynote Speaker, OAK BROOK, USA)
16:19 - 16:41 Future research. Alan MACFARLANE (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Keynote Speaker, Glasgow, United Kingdom)
16:41 - 17:03 Editor in chief perspective: Science vs. Advocacy. Brian SITES (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Plainfield, USA)
17:03 - 17:20 Q&A.
South Hall 1A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E38
15:30 - 16:20

PRO CON DEBATE
We need PNB for THR under spinal anaesthesia

Chairperson: eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Chairperson, Lausanne, Switzerland)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. eric ALBRECHT (Program director of regional anaesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Lausanne, Switzerland)
15:35 - 15:50 For the PROs. Kris VERMEYLEN (Md, PhD) (Keynote Speaker, ZAS ANTWERP, Belgium)
15:50 - 16:05 For the CONs. Sina GRAPE (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Sion, Switzerland)
16:05 - 16:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F38
15:30 - 16:20

SECOND OPINION BASED DISCUSSION
Confused about CRPS?

Chairperson: Andrea SAPORITO (Medical Director) (Chairperson, Bellinzona, Switzerland)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Andrea SAPORITO (Medical Director) (Keynote Speaker, Bellinzona, Switzerland)
15:35 - 15:50 CRPS is a primary Chronic Pain Syndrome. Maria Luz PADILLA DEL REY (Anesthesiologist and Pain Physician) (Keynote Speaker, MURCIA, Switzerland)
15:50 - 16:05 Early interventions are effective in CRPS t 1 and 2. Urs EICHENBERGER (Head of Department) (Keynote Speaker, Zürich, Switzerland)
16:05 - 16:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
G38
15:30 - 17:30

RA Taboo & Pictionary Competition
Competition reserved to Trainees only - Visitors are welcome! - Please go on the Trainees Corner to register your Trainee Team!

Chairpersons: Can AKSU (Professor) (Chairperson, Kocaeli, Turkey), Sari CASAER (Anesthesiologist) (Chairperson, Antwerp, Belgium), Ufuk YOROKOGLU (MD) (Chairperson, Kocaeli, Turkey)
Small Hall

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
H38
15:30 - 18:00

UARA WORKSHOP
RA and eFAST in the emergency setting

Demonstrators: Wolf ARMBRUSTER (Head of Department, Clinical Director) (Demonstrator, Unna, Germany), Maksym BARSA (Medical director of surgery, Anaesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Rivne, Ukraine), Dmytro DMYTRIIEV (chief of pain medicine department) (Demonstrator, Vinnitsa, Ukraine), Ruediger EICHHOLZ (Owner, CEO) (Demonstrator, Stuttgart, Germany), Andrii KHOMENKO (Anesthesiologist, ICU physician, Pain Medicine physician) (Demonstrator, Київ, Ukraine), Andrii STROKAN (chief clinical medical officer) (Demonstrator, Kyiv, Ukraine)
Free Workshop Limited to 36 first registrations
Learning goals:
• Apply all your ultrasound skills and knowledge under time pressure
• Rapid bedside diagnostics
• Rapid performance of blocks for instant pain relief and surgical procedures
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction.
15:35 - 15:50 How do we quickly identify the correct site of injection? Standardized scanning procedures are useful! Case presentations.
15:50 - 16:00 eFAST.
16:00 - 16:20 Hands-on - US STATION: RA upper limb.
16:20 - 16:40 Hands-on - US STATION: RA lower limb.
16:40 - 17:00 Hands on - US STATION: RA trunk.
17:00 - 17:20 Hands-on - US STATION: Pleura.
17:20 - 17:40 Hands-on - US STATION: eFAST.
17:40 - 18:00 Hands-on - US STATION: BLUE.
NORTH HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
I37
15:30 - 17:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 3 - PAEDIATRIC
Most Useful Blocks in Paediatric Patients

WS Leader: Fatma SARICAOGLU (Chair and Prof) (WS Leader, Ankara, Turkey)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 1: Upper Limb Surgery. Eleana GARINI (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Athens, Greece)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 2: Lower Limb Surgery. Per-Arne LONNQVIST (Professor) (Demonstrator, Stockholm, Sweden)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 3: Truncal Blocks. Fatma SARICAOGLU (Chair and Prof) (Demonstrator, Ankara, Turkey)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 4: Block Failure - Rescue Blocks. Ashwani GUPTA (Faculty and ESRA-DRA board member and examiner) (Demonstrator, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom)
220a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
J37
15:30 - 17:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 10 - CHRONIC PAIN
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Use for Pain Medicine - Joint Injections

WS Leader: Andrzej DASZKIEWICZ (anesthesiologist) (WS Leader, Cieszyn, Poland)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 1: Major Joints of Upper Extremity - Shoulder. Ismael ATCHIA (Consultant Rheumatologist) (Demonstrator, Newcastle, United Kingdom)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 2: Major Joints of Upper Extremity - Elbow & Wrist. Michal BUT (Consultant pain clinic) (Demonstrator, Koszalin, Poland)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 3: Major Joints of Lower Extremity - Hip. Gustavo FABREGAT (Anesthesiologist) (Demonstrator, Valencia, Spain)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 4: Major Joints of Lower Extremity - Knee. David LORENZANA (Head Pain Therapy) (Demonstrator, Zürich, Switzerland)
221a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
K37
15:30 - 17:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 4 - PAEDIATRIC
POCUS in the Paediatric Population

WS Leader: Ismet TOPCU (Anesthesiologist) (WS Leader, İzmir, Turkey)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 1: Airway Ultrasound in Children. Peter KENDERESSY (Senior Consultant and Lecturer in Paediatric Anaesthesia) (Demonstrator, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 2: Lung Ultrasound in Children. Karen BORETSKY (Senior Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine) (Demonstrator, Boston, USA)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 3: Gastric Ultrasound in Children. Luc TIELENS (pediatric anesthesiology staff member) (Demonstrator, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 4: Paediatric Vascular Access. Christian BERGEK (Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Gothenburg, Sweden)
223a

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
L37
15:30 - 17:30

HANDS - ON CLINICAL WORKSHOP 20 - RA
Necessary Blocks to Know: Thoracic and Abdominal Wall

WS Leader: Alexandros MAKRIS (Anaesthesiologist) (WS Leader, Athens, Greece)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 1: Breast Surgery. Teresa PARRAS (Consultant Anaesthetist) (Demonstrator, Spain, Spain)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 2: Thoracic Surgery. Emmanuel GUNTZ (Anaesthesiologist-Course leader for Anesthesiology ULB) (Demonstrator, Marseille, France)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 3: Abdominal Surgery. Laurent DELAUNAY (Anaesthesiologist, Intensivist and perioperative medicine) (Demonstrator, ANNECY, France)
15:30 - 17:30 Workstation 4: QLB. Paul KESSLER (Consultant) (Demonstrator, Frankfurt, Germany)
241

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
A35
15:30 - 17:20

PROSPECT SESSION

Chairperson: Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Chairperson, Leuven, Belgium)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
15:35 - 15:57 PROSPECT methodology update. Girish JOSHI (Professor) (Keynote Speaker, Dallas, Texas, USA, USA)
15:57 - 16:19 Laparoscopic and open colectomy. Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
16:19 - 16:41 Appendectomy. Dileep N. LOBO (Professor of Gastrointestinal Surgery) (Keynote Speaker, Nottingham, United Kingdom)
16:41 - 17:03 Sternotomy. Marc VAN DE VELDE (Professor of Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, Leuven, Belgium)
17:03 - 17:20 Q&A.
CONGRESS HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D38
15:30 - 16:20

EXPERT OPINION DISCUSSION
Refractory Angina Pain

Chairperson: Amy PEARSON (Interventional Pain Physician) (Chairperson, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
15:30 - 15:35 Introduction. Amy PEARSON (Interventional Pain Physician) (Keynote Speaker, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
15:35 - 15:50 #43470 - D38 Differential diagnosis.
Differential diagnosis.

Introduction:

Not only acute but also chronic chest pain belongs to one complaint relatively commonly presented by patients to primary care physicians. Chronic chest pain is defined as pain within the thoracic region lasting more than 3 months [1]. Refractory chest pain is defined as chronic chest pain not reacting satisfactorily to routine pain medication and/or adjuvant chronic pain therapy. The main goal of any clinician is to distinguish between pain of cardiac and non-cardiac origin and also differentiate between potentially life-threatening conditions and relatively benign ones.    

While the incidence of chest pain compared with other complaints in primary medical care is estimated between 7-24%, and in other sources even between 20-40% [2], the incidence of chronic or refractory chest pain in the community is not well investigated. The approximate prevalence of chronic cardiac chest pain in a population older than 60 years is estimated between 10-15%.

 

Refractory angina

Patients with diagnosed cardiac chest pain who are not suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or open surgical revascularization (CABG), and those not responding to standard conservative medical treatment get allocated a diagnosis of refractory angina. Chronic refractory angina is defined as any pain of cardiac origin associated with coronary vessel disease lasting for more than three months [3]. Pathophysiologically, refractory angina can be described as reversible attacks of the cardiac muscle ischemia with concurrent anatomical changes of the coronary vasculature and with poor response to any conservative or interventional therapy. Refractory angina pain is present in approximately 5-10% of all subjects diagnosed with ischemic heart disease [4]. Refractory angina is statistically associated with reduced quality of life, increased rate of hospital admissions, and also with increased financial burden for the healthcare system. Refractory angina may be divided into four phenotypes [5]: A – microvascular angina with minimum changes on coronary arteries (syndrome X), B – patients with localized narrowing or obstruction of coronary vessels, C – patients with diffuse atherosclerotic changes to the coronary arteries often affecting side branches or distal parts of the coronary vasculature, D – end-stage coronary artery disease with refractory angina pain even post PCI or CABG. The incidence of refractory angina on the European continent is reported to be as high as 30-50.000 patients yearly [2,3] with 50.000 new patients diagnosed in the United States every year [3].       

 

Differential diagnosis

It is clinically extremely important to differentiate cardiac chronic chest pain from pain of non-cardiac origin and subsequently, if cardiac chronic pain is confirmed, make its differential diagnosis and set up an appropriate pathway of medical and non-medical treatment. 

During the differential diagnosis of chronic chest pain, the clinicians should start systematically with the detailed history obtained from the patient or his/her relatives, review of the previous medical charts, hospital admissions, and outpatient visits [2]. Subsequently, all methods of physical examination (inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation) are used in the first instance. They should be followed by appropriate functional tests, laboratory methods, and evaluation using radiological examinations.  

The presence or probability of chronic cardiac pain can be confirmed or excluded from underlying symptoms, the patient´s age, sex, family history factors, and from the presence or absence of risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis.  Family history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, sudden cardiac death, the presence of diabetes, poorly controlled hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and abuse of smoking increase the probability of cardiac origin of chronic chest pain [6]. Essential information is also the identification of factors invoking, worsening, and alleviating chest pain. If provoking and worsening factors are associated with increased physical activity while reduction of intensity comes at rest, it is quite probable that the origin of pain is cardiac. Character and descriptors of pain can also help in the differential diagnosis of chronic chest pain. Sharp, exactly located pain is usually somatic in origin and may arise from subcutaneous tissue, muscles, ribs, or pleura. On the contrary, blunt, poorly located, or diffuse pain deep inside the chest is probably associated with myocardial ischemia or arises from the esophagus or stomach.

Vital signs such as heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure values, the character of the peripheral pulse wave, capillary refill time, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter, and body temperature should be evaluated and recorded in every patient suffering from chest pain [2].   Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) should be carried out in all patients where the cardiac cause of chest pain could not be safely excluded. It must be mentioned that ECG without ischemic changes cannot always exclude the cardiac origin of pain. Other cardiac examinations such as treadmill test, bicycle ergometry, dobutamine stress echocardiography, or even mini-invasive coronarography are indicated if the cardiac origin of the pain is probable. 

 

Other causes of chronic cardiac pain:

Vasospastic angina (Prinzmetal´s angina) – this type of angina pain is induced mainly by the coronary artery vasospasm at the level of epicardium [4]. Concurrent obstructive coronary artery affliction may be either absent or present. Precipitating factors may be multifactorial and involve stress, cold, hyperinsulinemia, use of vasospasm-inducing drugs such as cocaine. This type of angina can present during exercise or as well at rest. Myocardial infarction may develop if the spasm is not terminated. Vasospastic angina is in most cases relieved by the sublingual use of glyceryl trinitrate and/or calcium channel blockers. 

Pericarditis – pain in pericarditis is usually quite sharp, some patients describe it even as stabbing or stinging but a minority of affected persons may describe its character as pressure-like, dull, or astringent [2]. Pain is located mostly behind the sternum or inside of the left side of the chest but it can irradiate into the left shoulder, left arm, or neck. Its intensity decreases in the sitting position and worsens when supine, during deep breathing or coughing. Chronic constrictive pericarditis develops gradually and persists for more than 3 months. Diagnosis is confirmed with echocardiography.

Aortic stenosis – chest pain in aortic stenosis is similar to angina pain and is usually associated with physical activity. The presence of additional symptoms and findings such as shortness of breath, fatigue, palpitations, and long systolic murmur may help in differential diagnosis. Echocardiography confirms or excludes aortic stenosis.    

Mitral valve prolapse – the character of pain in this condition mostly differs from angina pain. It is more sharp often similar to myofascial pain but may be very intense and cause major anxiety. Other symptoms associated with mitral valve prolapse include palpitation, arrhythmias, dizziness, or dyspnea. Mitral valve prolapse is confirmed with echocardiography.

Congenital heart defects and other anomalies – almost one-third of adult patients with congenital heart disease report chronic pain. The prevalence of pain increases with age and in individuals older than 65 years, the incidence of moderate or severe pain is reported at 47% [7]. The highest incidence of pain has been reported in cyanotic congenital heart anomalies, Eisenmeger´s syndrome, and in those patients with a history of previous open heart surgery.

Pericardial effusion – chest pain is located directly behind the sternum or slightly on the left side from the sternal bone. Patients can also report the feeling of the full chest, tenderness, or pressure-like pain. Breathing difficulties and other symptoms usually improve when the affected persons sit up or stand up and worsen when lying flat. Transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography is indicated if this diagnosis is suspected.  

 

Causes of non-cardiac chronic chest pain:

Causes of non-cardiac (atypical) chronic chest pain include a relatively wide spectrum of diseases and conditions arising from pathologies or functional problems within the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, or from other organs of the thoracic cavity a chest wall [1]. The most important issue for the clinician is to distinguish between potentially life-threatening causes and relatively benign conditions. Any type of cancer should be always excluded. Other serious causes of chronic non-cardiac chest pain include almost all pulmonary diseases, GIT ulcers, and aneurysm/dissection of the intrathoracic aorta.     

Pulmonary origin: pneumonia, pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary infarction, intrapulmonary abscess, pleuritis, pneumothorax, hemothorax, asthma, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease.

Pulmonary origin of chronic chest pain should be always confirmed or excluded using imaging methods (CT, MRI, ultrasound, bronchoscopy, EBUS) [6].  Pain in COPD is often related to mediastinal fascias [8].

Origin from the gastrointestinal tract: esophagus inflammation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal spasm, esophageal cancer, gastritis, gastric or duodenal ulcer, Boerhave´s syndrome, less often cholecystitis (location predominantly right upper quadrant)  or pancreatitis (location predominantly epigastrium, middle back or the entire abdomen) [9].

Most similar pain to chronic angina is that associated with the involvement of the esophagus [1]. While esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and esophageal cancer may be quite easily diagnosed using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, CT, MRI, or ultrasound, the diagnosis of esophageal spasms is often very difficult [10].  

Origin in mediastinum: dissection of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, aneurysms of the ascending aorta, aortic arch or thoraco-abdominal aorta, mediastinitis.

These diseases are excluded or confirmed usually with an MRI or CT scan if an MRI is not feasible or available.

Musculoskeletal origin: Costochondritis, trauma to the ribs, sternum, chest wall muscles, muscle spasms, fibromyalgia, post-procedural chronic pain (sternotomy, thoracotomy, breast surgery), referred pain from the thoracic spine (facet joint, nerve root compression, inflammation, discogenic pain), chest wall tumors (infiltration of the ribs, sternum, mesothelioma, sarcomas, lymphomas, thymoma).

Pathologies of the musculosceletal system and chest wall are confirmed by imaging methods, functional conditions are often difficult to diagnose.   

Other origin: post-herpetic neuralgia, necrotizing fasciitis, panic attack disorders, psychiatric illness.

 

Conclusions

Differential diagnosis of chronic or refractory chest pain includes as a first step exclusion of the cardiac origin of pain. Comprehensive differential diagnosis is based on the patient´s history, physical examination, and the judicious use of laboratory tests, functional evaluations, and imaging methods.

Appendix    

Suggested treatment algorithm for refractory angina pain

Based on our more than 15-year experience with patients suffering from refractory angina pain in our center, we would like to suggest the following treatment algorithm:

1.      1. In the first step, we test the responsivity of the sympathetic nervous system in refractory angina pain. All patients undergo ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block on the left side with 10 ml of 0.2% bupivacaine (levo-bupivacaine) twice in a two-week interval. The intensity of pain using  a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, the frequency of angina attacks, and the consumption of glyceryl trinitrate is evaluated and recorded daily for one month. All patients having at least a 50% reduction in two out of these three evaluated parameters are considered responders to sympathetic block and indicated for left-sided radiofrequency ablation of  ympathetic chain at the level of T2 and T3.

2.      2. Patients not responding to sympathetic block are offered a trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and if they have a positive response, they receive implantation of a spinal cord stimulator.

3.      3. Patients in the terminal phase of their life may receive a tunneled high thoracic epidural catheter or systemic treatment with morphine.

        

References:

1.      1. Görge G, Grandt D, Häuser W. Chronischer brustschmerz. Schmerz 2014;28:282-8.

2.      2. Fritz AK, Faber P. Chronic cardiac chest pain. Cont Ed Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2012;12:302-6.

3.      3. Dobias M, Michalek P, Neuzil P, Stritesky M, Johnston P. Interventional treatment of pain in refractory angina. A review. Biomed Pap 2014;158:518-27.

4.      4. Makowski M, Makowska JS, Zielinska M. Refractory angina – unsolved problem. Cardiol Clin 2020;38:629-37.

5.      5. Lantz R, Quesada O, Mattingly G, Henry TD. Contemporary management of refractory angina. Interv Cardiol Clin 2022;11:279-92.

6.      6. Saitta D, Hebbard G. Beyond the heart: noncardiac chest pain. Aus J Gen Pract 2022;51:849-54.  

7.      7. Leibold A, Eichler E, Chung S, et al. Pain in adults with congenital heart disease – an international perspective. Int J Cardiol 2021;5:100200.

8.      8. Bordoni B, Marelli F, Morabito B, Castagna R. Chest pain in patients with COPD: the fascia´s subtle science. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulm Dis 2018;13:1157-65.

9.      9. Yamasaki T, Fass R. Noncardiac chest pain: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017;33:293-300.

10.  10. Zaher EA, Patel P, Atia G, Sigdel S. Distal esophageal spasm: an updated review. Cureus 2023;15:e41504.


Pavel MICHALEK (Praha, Czech Republic)
15:50 - 16:05 Management and outcome measurement. Teodor GOROSZENIUK (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, London, United Kingdom)
16:05 - 16:20 Q&A.
South Hall 1B
16:30

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
B37
16:30 - 17:20

SECOND OPINION BASED DISCUSSION
Radiofrequency ablation Different techniques similar outcome?

Chairperson: Dan Sebastian DIRZU (consultant, head of department) (Chairperson, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
16:30 - 16:32 Introduction. Dan Sebastian DIRZU (consultant, head of department) (Keynote Speaker, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
16:32 - 16:42 Cervical Medial Branch. David PROVENZANO (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, Bridgeville, USA)
16:42 - 16:52 Lumbar Medial Branch. Philip PENG (Office) (Keynote Speaker, Toronto, Canada)
16:52 - 17:02 Sacroilliac joint. Michele CURATOLO (Endowed Professor for Medical Education and Research) (Keynote Speaker, Seattle, USA)
17:02 - 17:12 Hip, Knee and Shoulder. Thomas HAAG (Consultant) (Keynote Speaker, Oswestry, United Kingdom)
17:12 - 17:20 Conclusion and Q&A.
PANORAMA HALL

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
D39
16:30 - 17:30

ESRA SESSION
Safety standards vs. practicality/reality of RA in different settings

Chairperson: Andre VAN ZUNDERT (Professor and Chair Anaesthesiology) (Chairperson, Brisbane Australia, Australia)
16:30 - 16:35 Introduction. Patrick NARCHI (Anesthesia) (Keynote Speaker, SOYAUX, France)
16:35 - 16:45 #43171 - D39 Australian Perspective: Acute pain service with pain nurse practitioner performing blocks.
Australian Perspective: Acute pain service with pain nurse practitioner performing blocks.

With increasing elderly population globally, rib and hip fractures have become commonplace. 

Unfortunately, fractured neck of femur (NOF) has 1 year mortality rate as high as 18-25%1-4. Surgery within 36 hours, involvement of an orthogeriatric team and regional anaesthesia techniques for pain management are interventions that can improve outcomes5-7.

In most Australian hospitals and globally, patients with fractured NOF receive a single shot femoral or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on arrival in the Emergency Department (ED)8-10. Systemic opioids then become the mainstay of analgesia which is often poorly tolerated by this frail, elderly cohort. 

Consultant anaesthetists’ unavailability to perform ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia (USGRA) outside theatre, hinders access to these much-needed blocks. Hence, most blocks are performed as a rescue analgesic technique when all else fails! Recognising this gap in the pain management, our pain nurse practitioner underwent rigorous training and assessment to upskill herself in specific USGRA techniques.

Currently, at our institution, the acute pain service (APS) offers daily ward based US guided FICB to all our fractured NOF patients awaiting surgery. Similarly, high risk rib fracture patients receive erector spinae catheter as the main analgesic technique in combination with multimodal analgesia. Timely access to blocks led by nurse practitioner has not only resulted in exceptional pain management but also a steep increase in number of regional anaesthesia techniques at our institution which has created opportunities for anaesthesia trainees to get more hands-on experience.

Results from a retrospective study conducted at our institution focusing on outcomes in these patients, safety of these blocks and a nursing staff survey on effect of these blocks on pressure care, pain management and their overall workload will be discussed. 

 

References:

 

1.     Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2023) Hip Fracture care pathways in Australia, Catalogue number PHE 336, AIHW, Australian Government.

2.     Dimet-Wiley A, Golovko G, Watowich S. One-Year Postfracture Mortality Rate in Older Adults With Hip Fractures Relative to Other Lower Extremity Fractures: Retrospective Cohort Study JMIR Aging 2022;5(1): e32683 URL:https://aging.jmir.org/2022/1/e32683

DOI: 10.2196/32683

3.     Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N, Bhandari M. Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years: a systematic review of RCTsActa Orthopaedica. 2014;85(1):54-9. doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.878831

4.     Leung MTY, Marquina C, Turner JP, Ilomaki J, Tran T, Bell JS. Hip fracture incidence and post-fracture mortality in Victoria, Australia: a state-wide cohort study. Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Apr 29;18(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01254-6. Erratum in: Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 22;18(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01286-y. PMID: 37119328; PMCID: PMC10148778

5.     https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124

6.     Griffiths R, Babu S, Dixon P, Freeman N, Hurford D, Kelleher E, Moppett I, Ray D, Sahota O, Shields M and White S. (2021), Guideline for the management of hip fractures 2020. Anaesthesia, 76: 225-237. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15291

7.     Pissens S, Cavens L, Joshi G.P, Bonnet M.P, Sauter A, Raeder J, Van de Velde M, on behalf of the PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (esrA), Pain management after hip fracture repair surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations. Acta Anaesth.Bel. 2024;75(1):15-31 https://doi.org/10.56126/75.1.04

8.     Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Annual Report 2023. https://anzhfr.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/1164/2023/09/ANZHFR-2023-Annual-Report-%E2%80%93-eReport-%E2%80%93-FINAL.pdf

9.     Steenberg J, Moller A. M. Systematic review of the effects of fascia iliaca compartment block on hip fracture patients before operation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2018;120(6):1368-1380

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.042

10.  O’Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Education 2019;19(6):191-197


Hosim PRASAI THAPA (Melbourne, Australia, Australia)
16:45 - 16:55 South African perspective: Regional Anesthesia in the absence of ideal equipment/training/safety standards. Francois RETIEF (Head Clinical Unit) (Keynote Speaker, Cape Town, South Africa)
16:55 - 17:05 Asian perspective: “Targeted spinal anaesthesia and the need for laying down safety norms”. Anju GUPTA (Faculty) (Keynote Speaker, New Delhi, India)
17:05 - 17:15 American perspective: “From USRA to POCUS - an easy transition for the regional anaesthetist”. Melody ANDERSON (Director of Regional Anesthesiology) (Keynote Speaker, Charlotte, USA)
17:15 - 17:30 Panel discussion.
South Hall 1B

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
E39
16:30 - 17:20

ASK THE EXPERT
Tourniquet

Chairperson: Matthieu CACHEMAILLE (Médecin chef) (Chairperson, Geneva, Switzerland)
16:30 - 16:35 Introduction. Matthieu CACHEMAILLE (Médecin chef) (Keynote Speaker, Geneva, Switzerland)
16:35 - 17:05 Tourniquet: Myths and facts; What we should teach the surgeons. Gernot GORSEWSKI (Bereichsleitender Oberarzt für Regionalanästhesie & Akutschmerztherapie) (Keynote Speaker, Feldkirch, Austria)
17:05 - 17:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2A

"Friday 06 September"

Added to your list of favorites
Deleted from your list of favorites
F39
16:30 - 17:20

ASK THE EXPERT
CRPS in children

Chairperson: Ovidiu PALEA (head of ICU and Pain Department) (Chairperson, Bucharest, Romania)
16:30 - 16:35 Introduction. Ovidiu PALEA (head of ICU and Pain Department) (Keynote Speaker, Bucharest, Romania)
16:35 - 17:05 #43310 - F39 Complex regional pain syndrome in children.
Complex regional pain syndrome in children.

CRPS in children, is it different from adults ??

Introduction

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a clinical disorder characterized by chronic pain, sometimes spontaneous, sometimes provoked by (minor) trauma or operation. The pain is disproportionate to the triggering event. It can be accompanied by sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor and trophic changes.

The diagnosis CRPS is a clinical diagnosis based on the new IASP-criteria, also known as the Budapest Criteria. Generally two different types are distinguished CRPS type I where there is no demonstrable nerve lesion and CRPS type II which results of a nerve lesion. Distinction between type I and II is unclear since nerve deficits are not well described. Additionally CRPS I and II do not differ in clinical presentation and choice of treatment. In literature other subtypes are mentioned, as an adaptation of the Budapest criteria: CRPS “with remission of some features” and CRPS NOS i.e. “not otherwise specified and no other diagnosis better explains clinical features”, meaning that the patient has never been documented to fulfill the new IASP-criteria (Goebel et al., 2021). Important is that none of these criteria have ever been validated for diagnosing CRPS in children. Also other cut off points for children are suggested (Friedrich Y 2019). So overlooking these adjustments, one may wonder if CRPS in children should always be labelled as CRPS NOS.

 

Figure 1

 

 

Now, is CRPS in children different from CRPS in adults ?

Epidemiology studies show that the incidence in children is more rare, around 1.14-1.2/100.000/year whereas in adults there is a range from 5.5 to 26.2/100.000/year (Abu-Arafeh and Abu-Arafeh 2016; Baerg et al., 2022; de Mos et al., 2007). Just like in adults the incidence is three-to eightfold higher in women. In contrary to adults lower extremities are more involved than upper extremities.

Children may present more often with “cold” CRPS, although swelling and sweating may be present. Skin discoloration and change in temperature are often present, but trophic changes to hair and nails are less often present than in adults. What is seen in almost every patient is severe pain (not dermatome determined, but more shaped like a sock or glove) with hyperalgesia and allodynia in such a way that gentle touch as from clothing or blankets cannot be tolerated. In more advanced cases decreased range of motion, muscular atrophy and dystonia can be seen. Prognostic, the syndrome may develop better than in adults but recurrence rates of 25-50% have been described.

 

 

Pathophysiology

In the past it has been discussed by pediatric pain specialists if the pathophysiology in children is different from adults but nowadays, although still not completely elucidated, the general consensus now that it is the same. The basis is probably a genetic determined susceptibility followed by an exaggerated inflammatory response after (sometimes minor) trauma or surgery. Peripheral and central sensitization, immune related factors and altered sympathetic nervous system functioning play a role next to psychologic factors. The incidence of psychologic factors is generally not higher than in other chronic pediatric chronic pain states (Lascombes and Mamie 2017; Logan et al., 2013; Stanton-Hicks 2010; Williams and Howard 2016). Furthermore the representation of the limbs on the somatosensory cortex changes which may reverse when the syndrome is cured.

 

Diagnosis

The diagnosis CRPS in children is, just as in adults, a clinical diagnosis based on the IASP “Budapest” diagnostic criteria although the criteria are not validated for children. Due to heterogeneity of the syndrome also experience of the clinician may be important in recognizing the symptoms.

Until now, no screening tools, laboratory tests or imaging diagnostics are specific to come to the diagnosis (Greenough et al., 2022). Probably due to unfamiliarity with CRPS in children and a lower prevalence there is still a delay before the patient is referred to a pediatric pain center (Kachko et al., 2008; Lascombes and Mamie 2017; Williams and Howard 2016)

 

Treatment

Due to the lack of evidence-based data there is no standardized treatment for CRPS in children.

Like most chronic pain conditions in children it needs an interdisciplinary approach according a biopsychosocial model. Physiotherapy by means of a graded exposure or graded activity plan next to desensitization is essential although there are no standard protocols on intensity or duration. Also transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) can be used as supportive treatment. Furthermore psychologic interventions through cognitive behavioral therapy to improve pain coping are important to enhance the physiotherapy program and to avoid refusal of the patient to move, because hand or foot is too painful.

Evidence for effective pharmacotherapeutic treatment options are limited. In literature concerning CRPS in adults a plea was made for a more mechanism based treatment where pharmacotherapy for CRPS in children is generally aiming on symptomatic relief (Mangnus et al., 2022; Williams and Howard 2016). In the Netherlands, free radical scavengers (dimethyl sulphoxide, vitamin C and acetylcysteine) are advised, but internationally they generally are not used. More commonly used drugs are paracetamol or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s) but their efficacy is low. In case of neuropathic/nociplastic pain gabapentinoids or tricyclic antidepressants (TCA’s) can be used, the latter specially if there are also sleeping problems. Further agents that are used are lidocaine patch, in case the painful area is limited, or capsaicin crème, used for desensitization and baclofen for dystonia. There is limited evidence for the use of corticosteroids in the acute phase of CRPS. In refractory cases esketamine i.v. can be considered as well as bisphosphonates in case of bone demineralization (Sheehy et al., 2015). In the past different interventional techniques have been used but evidence is weak and therefore interventional techniques are generally discouraged (Zernikow et al., 2012) (Zernikow et al., 2015). Also the use of neuromodulation remains controversial although one review described good results in a limited amount of patients (Karri et al., 2021). On the contrary good results are achieved with intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation thereapy (Simons et al., 2013).

 

Conclusion

Complex regional pain syndrome in children requires experienced assessment in a Pediatric Pain Center with an interdisciplinary approach. Education of patients, parents but also professionals about this rare condition is important. The outcome might be better if treatment is started without delay, although evidence for the different treatment modalities is limited and prognosis might be poorer than previously assumed (Tan et al., 2009; Wong et al., 2020).

 

 

 

 

 

Abu-Arafeh H and Abu-Arafeh I. Complex regional pain syndrome in children: incidence and clinical characteristics. Arch Dis Child 2016;101: 719-723.

Baerg K, Tupper SM, Chu LM, Cooke N, Dick BD, Doré-Bergeron MJ, Findlay S, Ingelmo PM, Lamontagne C, Mesaroli G, Oberlander TF, Poolacherla R, Spencer AO, Stinson J, Finley GA. Canadian surveillance study of complex regional pain syndrome in children. Pain 2022;163: 1060-1069.

de Mos M, de Bruijn AG, Huygen FJ, Dieleman JP, Stricker BH, Sturkenboom MC. The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome: a population-based study. Pain 2007;129: 12-20.

Friedrich Y ZD, Sieberg CB, et al.Evaluation of the Budapest Criteria.  International Symposium on Pediatric PainBasel, Switzerland; 2019.

Goebel A, Birklein F, Brunner F, Clark JD, Gierthmühlen J, Harden N, Huygen F, Knudsen L, McCabe C, Lewis J, Maihöfner C, Magerl W, Moseley GL, Terkelsen A, Thomassen I, Bruehl S. The Valencia consensus-based adaptation of the IASP complex regional pain syndrome diagnostic criteria. Pain 2021;162: 2346-2348.

Greenough M, Bucknall T, Jibb L, Lewis K, Lamontagne C, Squires JE. Attaining expert consensus on diagnostic expectations of primary chronic pain diagnoses for patients referred to interdisciplinary pediatric chronic pain programs: A delphi study with pediatric chronic pain physicians and advanced practice nurses. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2022;3: 1001028.

Kachko L, Efrat R, Ben Ami S, Mukamel M, Katz J. Complex regional pain syndromes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Int 2008;50: 523-527.

Karri J, Palmer JS, Charnay A, Garcia C, Orhurhu V, Shah S, Abd-Elsayed A. Utility of Electrical Neuromodulation for Treating Chronic Pain Syndromes in the Pediatric Setting: A Systematic Review. Neuromodulation 2021.

Lascombes P and Mamie C. Complex regional pain syndrome type I in children: What is new? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103: S135-s142.

Logan DE, Williams SE, Carullo VP, Claar RL, Bruehl S, Berde CB. Children and adolescents with complex regional pain syndrome: more psychologically distressed than other children in pain? Pain Res Manag 2013;18: 87-93.

Mangnus TJP, Bharwani KD, Dirckx M, Huygen F. From a Symptom-Based to a Mechanism-Based Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Drugs 2022;82: 511-531.

Sheehy KA, Muller EA, Lippold C, Nouraie M, Finkel JC, Quezado ZM. Subanesthetic ketamine infusions for the treatment of children and adolescents with chronic pain: a longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr 2015;15: 198.

Simons LE, Sieberg CB, Pielech M, Conroy C, Logan DE. What does it take? Comparing intensive rehabilitation to outpatient treatment for children with significant pain-related disability. J Pediatr Psychol 2013;38: 213-223.

Stanton-Hicks M. Plasticity of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) in children. Pain Med 2010;11: 1216-1223.

Tan EC, van de Sandt-Renkema N, Krabbe PF, Aronson DC, Severijnen RS. Quality of life in adults with childhood-onset of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I. Injury 2009;40: 901-904.

Williams G and Howard R. The Pharmacological Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Pediatric Patients. Paediatr Drugs 2016;18: 243-250.

Wong BJ, Yoon IA, Krane EJ. Outcome in young adults who were diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome in childhood and adolescence. Pain Rep 2020;5: e860.

Zernikow B, Dobe M, Hirschfeld G, Blankenburg M, Reuther M, Maier C. [Please don't hurt me!: a plea against invasive procedures in children and adolescents with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)]. Schmerz 2012;26: 389-395.

Zernikow B, Wager J, Brehmer H, Hirschfeld G, Maier C. Invasive treatments for complex regional pain syndrome in children and adolescents: a scoping review. Anesthesiology 2015;122: 699-707.


Tom G. DE LEEUW (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
17:05 - 17:20 Q&A.
South Hall 2B
20:00 CONGRESS NETWORKING DINNER